Tuesday, April 17, 2018

THE WORLD MUST KNOW

THE WORLD MUST KNOW

PureEvil - HellOnEarth

Published on Apr 16, 2018

Since 2011, more than 18,000 Syrian human beings have had their organs harvested. Men, women and children and the mainstream media has been silent.

No one is doing anything to stop it. Because it's business: Human trafficking, Satanic ritual abuse, organ harvesting. #PureEvil.

"So do not be afraid of them, for there is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed, or hidden that will not be made known." Matthew 10:26

https://qanonposts.com/

Please consider supporting SGT Report on Patron with a monthly contribution: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=5104183

700 Children Dead bodies found near

Malaysia Thailand border - TWB

700 Dead bodies of children

The images show 700 dead bodies of children. These children have been allegedly massacred by people who are involved in organ farming.

The bodies were found at the Thailand – Malaysia border. As soon as the pictures were posted on the internet there was an outcry about the incident. The images were shared by different users until they became viral

Warning

The disturbing images have compelled many parents to become extremely cautious. There have also been warnings over the internet to the parents not to let their children stray out of their sights.

The criminal elements involved in this crime are still at large, and must be planning to apprehend more children for the same purpose.

Cut Marks

The pictures show cut marks over the bodies of the unfortunate children. Another grueling aspect of the pictures is that they show children lined up like animals.

Some of them are tied. Some are even packed into card board boxes. The pictures suggest that the crime has been carried out by a large gang.

The children must have been kidnapped first. Then, their organs were harvested. These stolen organs must have been sold in the black market.

Organ Trade

The illegal organ trade is an illicit business in human organs or tissues so that they could be transplanted. The trade is fueled by an increasing global need for healthy body parts for transplantation.

However, the demand for these organs far exceeds the supply which is why the trade brings in huge profits. In some parts of the country, compensation to an organ donor is legal.

In many jurisdictions, however, the trade in human organs is illegal giving way to wide spread trafficking. A report has suggested that the poor people of the developing countries are the main targets of human organs transplant trade.

http://www.theworldbeast.com/700-children-dead-bodies-found-malaysia-thailand.html

theworldbeast.com

Parents' horror as Chinese boy, 6, has his eyes GOUGED OUT after being 'kidnapped by organ trafficker who stole both his corneas'

Youngster snatched while playing outside home in Linfen, Shanxi Province
Parents found him three hours later screaming in a field covered in blood
Kidnapper reportedly told boy: 'Don’t cry and I won’t gouge out your eyes'
Illicit trade fuelled because China has 300,000 on transplant waiting list

By Mail Foreign Service

Published: 08:01 EDT, 27 August 2013 | Updated: 20:52 EDT, 27 August 2013

Organ traffickers gouged out the eyes of a six-year-old boy to sell on China’s transplant black market, it was claimed yesterday.

Police said the child, Binbin, was drugged after being kidnapped while playing outside his home.

His family found him covered in blood and crying in pain three to four hours later. His eyes were found nearby with the corneas missing, police say, implying that an organ trafficker was behind the attack.

Horrific: The Chinese boy lies in hospital after he had his eyes gouged out

Recovering: The youngster was playing alone outside his home in Linfen, Shanxi Province, when he was snatched on Monday evening

An entire eye cannot be transplanted, but a cornea could be vital for a patient with faltering vision.

Police are seeking a woman suspect and have offered £10,500 for information leading to an arrest.

Binbin’s devastated father said: ‘We didn’t notice his eyes were gone when we discovered him – he had blood all over his face. We thought he had fallen down and smashed his face.’

The boy was rushed to hospital where doctors were shocked to find his eyes had been removed. His father said: ‘His eyelids were turned inside out, and his eyeballs were not there.’

Illegal organ harvesting is booming in China, where there is a shortage of donors, and last night, amid domestic and international outrage, Beijing was urged to crack down on the country’s multi-million-pound transplant industry.

Binbin was shown on state TV being taken in bandages from an operating theatre to a hospital bed, writhing in agony as his shocked family wept. China Central Television said he had been drugged and ‘lost consciousness’ before the attacker removed his eyes.

His parents discovered he was missing when they called for him to come in around 8pm on Monday but received no response.

After a frantic search with relatives, they found him screaming in a field near their home in Fenxi, north China. The kidnapper had reportedly told Binbin: ‘Don’t cry and I won’t gouge out your eyes.’

WHY DID THEY TAKE THE CORNEAS?

The organ trafficker may have been motivated by money. But they could also have been driven to such a horrific crime by the hope of saving someone's sight - or even their own.

Problems with the cornea - the clear front part of the eye - can cause the eye to mist up and, if left untreated, lead to blindness. But the most serious conditions such as Fuchs' dystrophy, a degenerative condition that affects older people, can be cured with a transplant, above (file picture).

Until recent years, the only operation was a full cornea transplant, an operation that involved 24 stitches in each eye and an 18-month recovery period. But advances in technology have meant surgeons can now carry out a partial replacement under local anesthetic with a recovery time of just four weeks.

China does not have a donor culture, but about 300,000 patients need transplants each year. Only about 10,000 receive organs, mainly taken from death-row prisoners.
Though the sale and transplant of organs for money is prohibited, lax laws and wide spread corruption have fuelled a booming industry. China is also a leading destination for ‘transplant tourists’ who travel there to obtain organs.

Last night international doctors appalled by Binbin’s suffering called on leading medical journals to ban publication of Chinese research papers on organ transplants, to shame the country into tackling the problem.

Professor Arthur Caplan, head of medical ethics at New York University and spokesman for Doctors Against Forced Organ Harvesting, said: ‘As unimaginable and untrue as this boy’s torment sounds, it shocks but does not surprise.

‘Whereas hearts, livers and kidneys must be sourced from donors who match the same blood and body type of recipient patients, in-demand corneas for corrective eyesight operations can be taken from any age and body type. ‘Anyone who knows where the corneas are located in the eye can extract them, and I fear for the unsterile conditions and the barbaric methods used, and that infection may add to the boy’s suffering. ‘He will suffer unthinkable physical and psychological pain.’

Professor Caplan urged international governments to ‘stand up to China’ and take action to make it clean up its transplant industry. ‘Transplant tourists who travel to China with the right amount of money can order the organ needed,’ he said. ‘A prisoner is found to match the recipient and is taken out and shot.’

Last weekend, Chinese police detained members of a kidney- trafficking ring, including a team of four doctors and nurses.

North and South Korea reportedly set to announce official end to war

North and South Korea reportedly set to announce an official end to war 1 Hour Ago | 00:46

North and South Korea are in talks to announce a permanent end to the officially declared military conflict between the two countries, daily newspaper Munhwa Ilbo reported Tuesday, citing an unnamed South Korean official.
Ahead of a summit next week between North Korean premier Kim Jong Un and South Korean President Moon Jae-in, lawmakers from the neighboring states were thought to be negotiating the details of a joint statement that could outline an end to the confrontation.

Kim and Moon could also discuss returning the heavily fortified demilitarized zone separating them to its original state, the newspaper said.
Pyongyang and Seoul have technically been at war since the 1950-1953 Korean conflict ended with a truce — and not a peace treaty. Geopolitical tensions have occasionally flared up since the armistice, although to date both countries have managed to avoid another devastating conflict.

A successful summit between the Koreas later this month could help pave the way for a meeting between Kim and President Donald Trump. The U.S. president and North Korean leader are poised to hold talks in late May or June, according to the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA).

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/17/north-and-south-korea-reportedly-set-to-announce-official-end-to-war.html

CORSI EXPOSES TRUTH | TRUMP RECRUITED BY MILITARY!!!

Monday, April 16, 2018

OFFENSIVE Songs That Wouldn't Be Allowed Now

COURT RULES ILLEGAL ALIENS CAN SUE

MORE EVIDENCE OF OBAMA'S TRAITOROUS ACTS TO BURY THIS COUNTRY ...................

(FLORIDA FEDERAL) COURT RULES ILLEGAL ALIENS CAN SUE OVER "DISCRIMINATORY EMPLOYMENT POLICY" REQUIRING GREEN CARDS

This shows how out of touch the Obama 'judges' are with the real world. An employer can be charged and fined for hiring individuals without green cards but the illegal aliens can sue the employers for not hiring them for not having a green card. Is there any doubt that this entire system is broken and needs to be replaced from the top down? You can thank the Bushes, Clintons and Obamas for that.

APRIL 11, 2018
JUDICIAL WATCH

For the second time in a few years, a federal court has ruled that illegal immigrants can sue American employers that refuse to hire them because they require workers to be U.S. citizens or legal residents (green card holders).

The latest blow to the rule of law was delivered by an Obama-appointed federal judge in south Florida who handed a powerful open-borders group a huge victory in a case accusing a major U.S. company of discriminating against an illegal immigrant.

Though years apart, both lawsuits were filed by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), a leftist group that specializes in discrimination lawsuits on behalf of illegal immigrants and has Chicago ties to Obama.

MALDEF pushes for free college tuition for illegal immigrants and lowering educational standards to accommodate new migrants. Its leadership refers to the U.S. government’s immigration enforcement effort as racist and xenophobic, and says it’s racist to make English the country’s official national language and inhumane to protect the southern border with a fence.

(TRY crossing the northern border in to Canada or the southern border in to Mexico and see what prison you wind up in and if you can successfully sue either country or even get a ticket back home in the states. The borders of the united States, however, are supposed to be open and 'free' to any one and any thing without question or legal actions to the unlawful invaders - quite the opposite to Mexico and Canada.)

Both MALDEF victories involve plaintiffs who benefit from a special Obama amnesty known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) that shields nearly 800,000 illegal aliens under the age of 31 from deportation.

In the recent Florida case a Venezuelan immigrant, David Rodriguez, living in Miami is suing consumer goods corporation Procter & Gamble for refusing to give him a paid internship because he is not a legal resident or citizen of the United States. MALDEF filed the lawsuit last year in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Procter & Gamble requires citizenship and immigration status information on its applications and warns that candidates “must be a U.S. citizen or national, refugee, asylee or lawful permanent resident.” Rodriquez is neither and he quickly played the discrimination card after getting nixed as a candidate.

In a statement MALDEFF’s president reminds that “work-authorized DACA holders are valuable contributors to our economy” and “should not have to face arbitrary and biased exclusions from employment, especially by large and sophisticated corporations like Procter & Gamble.”

Judge Kathleen M. Williams, a former public defender appointed to the federal bench by Obama in 2011, agrees, citing MALDEF’s other lawsuit in her ruling. In denying Procter & Gamble’s motion to dismiss Rodriguez’s lawsuit, Judge Williams claims the Venezuelan immigrant’s claims are “strikingly similar” to those in MALDEF’s 2014 suit against insurance company Northwestern Mutual in New York. In that complaint, a Mexican illegal alien protected by DACA alleged that Northwestern Mutual’s policy requiring him to have a green card because he’s not a U.S. citizen discriminated against him. Requiring the Mexican national, Ruben Juarez, to provide proof of legal residency imposed an additional burden that constitutes alienage discrimination, according to the complaint filed on his behalf by MALDEF.

The federal judge hearing that case in New York agreed and, in a federal courtroom more than 1,000 miles south, Williams used the decision to justify hers. “In Juarez, the plaintiff was a DACA recipient who was denied employment based on Northwestern Mutual’s policy to only hire U.S. citizens and green card holders,” Judge Williams writes in her ruling. “There, on strikingly similar facts, the court found that Northwestern Mutual’s policy impermissibly discriminated against a subclass of Iawfully present aliens.” The ruling continues to say that Procter & Gamble’s policy could be construed to discriminate against a subset of legal aliens, which are protected. It seems to agree with the illegal alien’s assertions that Procter & Gamble has a “facially discriminatory employment policy” for requiring candidates to furnish proof that they’re in the U.S. legally.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2018/04/court-rules-illegal-aliens-can-sue-discriminatory-employment-policy-requiring-green-cards/

Traitor Obama's policies continue to live on presenting serious legal problems for this nation long after his term as 'president' of the criminal cabal rogue 'government' has ended.

Scientists accidentally create mutant enzyme that eats plastic bottles

The breakthrough, spurred by the discovery of plastic-eating bugs at a Japanese dump, could help solve the global plastic pollution crisis

Damian Carrington Environment editor

@dpcarrington

Mon 16 Apr 2018 15.00 EDT Last modified on Mon 16 Apr 2018 18.52 EDT

The enzymes could enable plastic bottles to be fully recycled for the first time. Photograph: Fred Dufour/AFP/Getty Images

Scientists have created a mutant enzyme that breaks down plastic drinks bottles – by accident. The breakthrough could help solve the global plastic pollution crisis by enabling for the first time the full recycling of bottles.

The new research was spurred by the discovery in 2016 of the first bacterium that had naturally evolved to eat plastic, at a waste dump in Japan. Scientists have now revealed the detailed structure of the crucial enzyme produced by the bug.

The international team then tweaked the enzyme to see how it had evolved, but tests showed they had inadvertently made the molecule even better at breaking down the PET (polyethylene terephthalate) plastic used for soft drink bottles. “What actually turned out was we improved the enzyme, which was a bit of a shock,” said Prof John McGeehan, at the University of Portsmouth, UK, who led the research. “It’s great and a real finding.”

The mutant enzyme takes a few days to start breaking down the plastic – far faster than the centuries it takes in the oceans. But the researchers are optimistic this can be speeded up even further and become a viable large-scale process.

“What we are hoping to do is use this enzyme to turn this plastic back into its original components, so we can literally recycle it back to plastic,” said McGeehan. “It means we won’t need to dig up any more oil and, fundamentally, it should reduce the amount of plastic in the environment.”

About 1m plastic bottles are sold each minute around the globe and, with just 14% recycled, many end up in the oceans where they have polluted even the remotest parts, harming marine life and potentially people who eat seafood. “It is incredibly resistant to degradation. Some of those images are horrific,” said McGeehan. “It is one of these wonder materials that has been made a little bit too well.”

However, currently even those bottles that are recycled can only be turned into opaque fibres for clothing or carpets. The new enzyme indicates a way to recycle clear plastic bottles back into clear plastic bottles, which could slash the need to produce new plastic.

“You are always up against the fact that oil is cheap, so virgin PET is cheap,” said McGeehan. “It is so easy for manufacturers to generate more of that stuff, rather than even try to recycle. But I believe there is a public driver here: perception is changing so much that companies are starting to look at how they can properly recycle these.”

The new research, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, began by determining the precise structure of the enzyme produced by the Japanese bug. The team used the Diamond Light Source, near Oxford, UK, an intense beam of X-rays that is 10bn times brighter than the sun and can reveal individual atoms.

The structure of the enzyme looked very similar to one evolved by many bacteria to break down cutin, a natural polymer used as a protective coating by plants. But when the team manipulated the enzyme to explore this connection, they accidentally improved its ability to eat PET.

“It is a modest improvement – 20% better – but that is not the point,” said McGeehan. “It’s incredible because it tells us that the enzyme is not yet optimised. It gives us scope to use all the technology used in other enzyme development for years and years and make a super-fast enzyme.”

Industrial enzymes are widely used in, for example, washing powders and biofuel production, They have been made to work up to 1,000 times faster in a few years, the same timescale McGeehan envisages for the plastic-eating enzyme. A patent has been filed on the specific mutant enzyme by the Portsmouth researchers and those from the US National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Colorado.

One possible improvement being explored is to transplant the mutant enzyme into an “extremophile bacteria” that can survive temperatures above the 70C melting point of PET – the plastic is likely to degrade 10-100 times faster when molten.

Earlier work had shown that some fungi can break down PET plastic, which makes up about 20% of global plastic production. But bacteria are far easier to harness for industrial uses.

Other types of plastic could be broken down by bacteria currently evolving in the environment, McGeehan said: “People are now searching vigorously for those.” PET sinks in seawater but some scientists have conjectured that plastic-eating bugs might one day be sprayed on the huge plastic garbage patches in the oceans to clean them up.

“I think [the new research] is very exciting work, showing there is strong potential to use enzyme technology to help with society’s growing waste problem,” said Oliver Jones, a chemist at RMIT University in Melbourne, Australia, and not part of the research team.

“Enzymes are non-toxic, biodegradable and can be produced in large amounts by microorganisms,” he said. “There is still a way to go before you could recycle large amounts of plastic with enzymes, and reducing the amount of plastic produced in the first place might, perhaps, be preferable. [But] this is certainly a step in a positive direction.”

Prof Adisa Azapagic, at the University of Manchester in the UK, agreed the enzyme could be useful but added: “A full life-cycle assessment would be needed to ensure the technology does not solve one environmental problem – waste – at the expense of others, including additional greenhouse gas emissions.”

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/apr/16/scientists-accidentally-create-mutant-enzyme-that-eats-plastic-bottles

Donald Trump Is About To Arrest Obama and Clinton

HAT'S OFF TO OUR GOOD MILITARY
TO JEROME CORSI
TO ALEX JONES
AND MOST OF ALL
TO OUR

PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP

WHO IS WORKING FOR "US"
FOR OUR COUNTRY
FOR OUR FREEDOM
(TOTALLY WITHOUT PAY)

~~ IN ORDER TO ~~
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

Corsi: Donald Trump Is About To Arrest Obama and Clinton

and

JoshTolley

Published on Apr 4, 2018

Trump is about to make arrests according to Jerome Corsi.
Treason charges and military tribunals may happen THIS YEAR!
Will Hillary end up in Gitmo?
Will Obama be sent to Leavenworth?

Sunday, April 15, 2018

Q is dropping like mad tonight! Oh boy....

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG/pdf/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG-2-4-3-12.pdf

'Full Metal Jacket' actor R. Lee Ermey dies at age 74

R. Lee Ermey, pictured in 2014, appeared in films as varied as 'Mississippi Burning' and 'Toy Story.' (Charles Sykes/ AP Images for IAVA and Victory Motorcycles)

R. Lee Ermey, a former Marine Corps drill instructor known to millions of moviegoers as the sadistic Gunnery Sergeant Hartman in Stanley Kubrick's "Full Metal Jacket," died Sunday morning, according to his longtime manager. He was 74.

In a statement posted on Twitter, Bill Rogin said Ermey had died due to complications from pneumonia.

"He will be greatly missed by all of us," Rogin wrote. "Semper Fi, Gunny. Godspeed."

A Kansas native, Ermey enlisted in the Marine Corps in 1961 at age 17. He served for 11 years, including 14 months in Vietnam, before he was discharged in 1972. He served as a technical adviser in Francis Ford Coppola's 1979 Vietnam War epic, "Apocalypse Now," in which he also had a small role as a helicopter pilot.

But Ermey didn't get his big break until eight years later, in Kubrick's own take on Vietnam. He was originally supposed to be a technical adviser, but Kubrick offered him the role of Gunnery Sergeant Hartman after seeing a demo tape of Ermey railing at extras while tennis balls flew at him.

In his role as a drill instructor breaking in new Marines at boot camp on Parris Island, S.C., Ermey roared his way into film history by berating his unfortunate charges.

WARNING: VIDEO CONTAINS PROFANITY

"Here you are all equally worthless," Ermey/Hartman says by way of introduction. "And my orders are to weed out all non-hackers who do not pack the gear to serve in my beloved Corps. Do you maggots understand that?"
The main target of Ermey's wrath is the unfortunate, overweight Private Pyle, played by Vincent D'Onofrio.

"Were you born a fat, slimy, scumbag puke piece of s---," Private Pyle, or did you have to work on it?" the gunnery sergeant asks in one scene.

But having turned Private Pyle into a killing machine, Hartman is helpless when his own creation turns on him, gunning him down the night after boot camp graduation after Hartman asks: "What is your major malfunction, numbnuts?"
Kubrick told Rolling Stone that 50 percent of Ermey's dialogue in the film was his own.

"In the course of hiring the marine recruits, we interviewed hundreds of guys. We lined them all up and did an improvisation of the first meeting with the drill instructor. They didn't know what he was going to say, and we could see how they reacted. Lee came up with, I don't know, 150 pages of insults," Kubrick said.

D'Onofrio and "Full Metal Jacket" co-star Matthew Modine tweeted their condolences late Sunday, with Modine quoting the poet Dylan Thomas.

"Full Metal Jacket" earned Ermey a Golden Globe nomination, as well as a career playing authority figures -- from Mayor Tilman in 1988's "Mississippi Burning" to little green army man Sarge in the more family-friendly "Toy Story."
In all, Ermey racked up more than 60 credits in television and film, including apperances in "Se7en," "Prefontaine," and "Toy Soldiers." He also hosted the History Channel series "Mail Call" and "Lock N' Load with R. Lee Ermey."
An outspoken conservative, Ermey spoke to Fox News in 2016 about being "blackballed" from Hollywood over his political views.

"I've had a very fruitful career. I've done over 70 feature films," he said. "I've done over 200 episodes of [Outdoor Channel series 'GunnyTime']... and then [Hollywood] found out that I'm a conservative."

Actually, he corrected, "I'm an Independent, but I said something bad about the president. I had something unsavory to say about the president's administration, and even though I did vote for him the first time around, I was blackballed."
Ermey, who was an NRA board member, said at the time that his association with the organization and his disapproval of President Obama cost him acting jobs.

"Do you realize I have not done a movie in five to six years? Why? Because I was totally blackballed by the ... liberals in Hollywood," he alleged. "They can destroy you. They're hateful people [who] don't just not like you, they want to take away your livelihood ... that's why I live up in the desert on a dirt road ... I don't have to put up with their crap."

"He will be greatly missed by all of us," Rogin told The Associated Press Sunday. "It is a terrible loss that nobody was prepared for."

Rogin says that while his characters were often hard and principled, the real Ermey was a family man and a kind and gentle soul who supported the men and women who serve.

Fox News' Sasha Savitsky and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/04/15/full-metal-jacket-actor-r-lee-ermey-dies-at-age-74.html

Amber had time

[MUST-SEE] David Hogg Meets His Match

David Hogg acts as if he is the voice of his entire generation… but is it true?

The student-turned-activist has become famous for his spiteful rants against NRA members and law-abiding Americans, even going so far as to declare that gun owners are “pathetic f***ers that want to keep killing our children.”

At the same time, he has lectured adults — you know, the people who actually vote and pay taxes — for not knowing how to “use a f***ing democracy,” and implied that teenagers were going to change gun laws.

...

Meet Elizabeth Najjar. Like David Hogg, she’s a high school student who is passionate and fired up about the gun control debate… but she’s taking a different approach.

So sad, so true.

WTH.... Punched in "When did Bush die?"and this came up. Need to put out in public. (Nesara ?) Joe

This was emailed to me.. Freewill

April 1, 2015 by GM Admin

Former President George W. Bush Dead at 72 (10/05/18)

Policy Review, October 5, 2018—George W. Bush, the 43rd president of the United States, died today at Methodist Hospital in Houston, Texas. He was 72. The cause of death was announced as heart failure.

Mr. Bush’s always controversial presidency left behind a changed nation and a changed world. Taking office in 2001 after a disputed election settled only by a 5-4 decision by a bitterly divided Supreme Court, and decisively reelected in 2004, President Bush led the United States into four wars, oversaw the dismantling of Social Security and Medicare, and enforced a drastic shrinking of elementary, secondary, and collegiate education. He spearheaded the transformation of President Bill Clinton’s budget surpluses of 1999 and 2000 into permanent deficits of more than a trillion dollars a year, thus profoundly reducing the amount of capital available to address the needs of the vast majority of citizens and inhibiting the creation of new jobs with any promise of advancement or financial security, while at the same time pursuing tax reductions that increased the differences between the income and assets of, in his own terminology, “owners” and “pre-owners” of “the American ownership society” to extremes almost beyond measure. When he left office, taxation of personal and corporate incomes, while still legally extant, had been effectively replaced by a new payroll tax, so that almost all investment, inheritance, and interest income was left tax-free. “Those with the greatest stake in America,” President Bush often said throughout his second term, “have the greatest stake in defending it. Thus we as a nation must do all that we can to ensure that the commitment of those with the greatest stake to the rest of us, a commitment on which our freedom and security rests, only grows greater.”

Adding to Mr. Bush’s statutory and administrative economic policies were a series of decisions by the “Bush Court,” as the Supreme Court was known after 2005, when in that year Mr. Bush replaced three retiring members with very conservative justices (a fourth was replaced in 2006), depriving government regulation of corporations and the environment of any legal basis—decisions which many analysts considered more significant than the repudiation by the Bush Court of previous decisions upholding a woman’s right to privacy in the matter of abortion and certain applications of affirmative action. Even with the Bush Court seated, however, the Republican-controlled Congress that Mr. Bush enjoyed throughout his presidency repeatedly passed legislation removing issue after issue from the purview of the state and federal courts, including questions of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the right to assemble, and the right to trial by jury. Despite these prohibitions of judicial review, the government, under Mr. Bush, did not press for any legislation curtailing what had previously been referred to as “First Amendment freedoms,” but simply refrained from challenging such legislation passed by many states, rather filing supportive briefs before the Supreme Court when such measures were contested. Ultimately the reversal of the series of 20th-century Supreme Court decisions subjecting the states to the Bill of Rights, long-sought by certain conservatives, was achieved not de jure but de facto. “The press is legally free,” the former New York Times columnist Frank Rich put it in 2007, writing in his online journal Thatsrichbrother.com. “It merely refrains from practicing freedom.” Some said the same of the nation as a whole; others said the country was freer than it had ever been.

Mr. Bush was born in New Haven, Connecticut, on July 6, 1946, and raised in Houston and Midland, Texas, where his father, the former President George H. W. Bush, began his careers in oil and politics. Mr. Bush attended Andover Academy and graduated from Yale University in 1968. During the Vietnam War he was a member of the Texas Air National Guard, known at the time as a safe haven from combat duty; whether Mr. Bush did in fact fulfill his military obligations became a subject of dispute during his second election campaign. In 1975 Mr. Bush graduated from Harvard Business School and began careers in oil and politics in Texas; neither flourished. Though he married the former Laura Welch in 1977 and fathered twin daughters Jenna (named for Mrs. Bush’s mother) and Barbara (named for Mr. Bush’s mother) in 1981, Mr. Bush’s life through his early 40s was characterized by business failures, accusations of insider trading, reports of silent bailouts, and self-confessed “drinking.” (Mr. Bush claimed to have renounced drinking—the word alcoholism was never used—the day after his 40th birthday, as the result of divine intervention and an act of will.) He became a public figure in 1989 when, through a questioned investment, he became part of the consortium that bought the Texas Rangers baseball franchise; his title as managing partner produced an impression of competence and good humor. In 1994 Mr. Bush ran for governor of Texas and proved himself a first-rate campaigner. When he was elected, Texas was a bipartisan state; as Mr. Bush’s advisor Karl Rove once said, “He charmed Democrats into riding on his strong back as he forded the river of discord.” When Mr. Bush left office as president, the Texas government was all Republican.

Mr. Bush was a politician opponents underestimated at their peril, and throughout his career his opponents did just that. He cultivated an aura of know-nothingness, of “a fine disregard” of inconvenient facts or opinions, but he was devastating on the attack, able to present himself as an ordinary man outraged by the self-superiority of whoever might be opposing him at any time and on any issue. Even as president, before the al Qaeda terrorist attacks on Washington, D.C., and New York City, in 2001, he was not always taken seriously by political commentators or the public at large; after that event he became a heroic figure, standing in defense of the United States as if that historic responsibility were his alone.

He launched an assault against Afghanistan, where al Qaeda had its headquarters and training grounds, weeks after the 2001 attacks, leading to the immediate fall of the totalitarian Islamic regime of the Taliban, which had given al Qaeda sanctuary. Though Osama bin Laden, the leader of the worldwide Islamist movement, escaped capture, his forces were severely weakened and scattered; during Mr. Bush’s first term there was, against all expectations and predictions, no further terrorist attack on American soil. Arguing that Saddam Hussein’s government in Iraq was a center of terrorist plotting and a repository of terrorist weaponry, from what turned out to be nonexistent chemical and biological arms to equally chimerical nuclear technology, Mr. Bush in 2003 led a limited international coalition into Iraq and replaced Mr. Hussein with an occupying force, which over the next year was pushed back into consistently shrinking enclaves in the face of a fierce insurgency. Following his reelection in 2004, Mr. Bush ordered the destruction of the cities where the insurgents were thought to be concentrated; though the cities were destroyed, the insurgency continued. Mr. Bush then pressed on to Iran and North Korea, which he had identified as “rogue states.”

With U.S. Armed Forces tied down in Iraq, Mr. Bush turned to what critics called a “private army subject to no law and operating at the whim of a single individual”—that is, to large numbers of private contractors employed by U. S., Serbian, Nigerian, and Saudi corporations—to launch land, sea, and air attacks meant to destroy nuclear facilities in both Iran and North Korea. While the Afghan and Iraqi armies and governments had collapsed almost at the first sign of American assault, the Iranian and North Korean invasions were beaten back by sustained resistance and, in North Korea, the use of explosives that Mr. Bush denounced as “tactical nuclear weapons,” though this was later proved not to be the case.

Nonetheless Mr. Bush then ordered what he described as “pinpoint” nuclear attacks on the nuclear sites in Iran and North Korea, which, while achieving their goals, also led to the One-Day War, a nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan that left Bombay and Karachi in ruins and led to the fall of the governments of both countries, and to the withdrawal of the American-led coalition forces from Iraq. The result was the series of still-continuing civil wars throughout the Middle East and the Indian subcontinent that, while involving no unconventional weapons since 2006 have, according to the United Nations, caused the deaths of 12 million people and the displacement of millions more. Mr. Bush’s claim in action if not in words that the United States retained an international monopoly on the legitimate use of force left allies such as Great Britain and alliances such as NATO crippled; it also left the United States at least formally unchallenged.

It was often said, during Mr. Bush’s first term, that he saw himself as a messianic figure, ordained by God to carry the flag of freedom (“God’s gift,” in Mr. Bush’s words, “to every individual”) to the corners of the earth, and that the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, at least, were part of a crusade of transcendent significance. After Mr. Bush’s reelection, it was increasingly argued that his wars were a diversionary and obfuscatory tactic meant to raise Mr. Bush’s standing, and the power of the Republican Party both in Congress and in the states, solely for the benefit of Mr. Bush’s domestic agenda, and that, as the poet Donald Hall wrote, “it was the United States itself that was the true object of conquest.” While that is a matter for history to settle (when, as Mr. Bush himself once put it, “we’ll all be dead”), few would dispute that Mr. Bush left the United States if not conquered then irrevocably changed—and, according to the American novelist Philip Roth, who in 2008, cited by the Swedish Academy as “the voice of a lost republic,” was awarded the Nobel Prize for literature, “less a nation governed by its citizenry, where each of us has one vote, than a stock exchange owned by its shareholders, according to the number of their shares.”

Mr. Bush’s Republican Party had, during his time in office, so effectively marginalized the opposition Democratic Party that it all but ceased to function in many states. After the suspension of the filibuster rule in the U.S. Senate, the remaining 45 Democratic senators were unable to block any of Mr. Bush’s appointments to the federal courts or the executive branch of government. The Republicans had so successfully supported Mr. Bush as an infallible and irreplaceable leader that he came to seem, in fact, irreplaceable. There was no figure in the party who did not appear diminished as soon as his or her name was mentioned alongside of his, and the notion of any ordinary Republican actually succeeding Mr. Bush became, in the words of William Kristol, editor of the conservative journal the Daily Standard, “unthinkable.” Thus was the strategy devised to introduce a constitutional amendment to remove the requirement in Article 1 that no one could be elected president were he or she not native born, supposedly to permit the presidential candidacy of the native-born Austrian Arnold Schwarzenegger, the enormously popular and skillful governor of California and the one Republican other than Mr. Bush who did sometimes appear larger than life. It later transpired that the amendment was a ruse: When Democrats attempted to “poison” the amendment by proposing that all restrictions on who might become president be removed (the requirement that a president be at least 35 years old, the two-term limit), the Republicans immediately acquiesced, and as a result of the passage of the 28th Amendment in 2006 and its ratification by the states the next year, in 2008 Mr. Bush announced his candidacy for a third term. He was overwhelmingly defeated that November by former President Bill Clinton.

Mr. Bush’s life after his presidency was marked by misfortune. He soon lost interest in his status as the standard-bearer of his party and its chief fundraiser; many believed he had again begun drinking, and in any case he seemed to spend most of his time at private clubs in Houston, where he established residence in 2010 after selling his property in Crawford, Texas. (“At least I won’t have to cut that f— brush again,” Mr. Bush was heard to say after his last election.) Then on May 1, 2011, Jenna and Barbara Bush were killed in a drunken driving accident in New York City, an incident that also took the lives of seven other people, four of them friends of the Bush daughters. Rumors that a Bush family friend attempted to bribe the police to report that a person other than Jenna or Barbara Bush was driving (the body of Barbara Bush was in the driver’s seat) were never confirmed. Four years later, in 2015, Laura Bush, like her father, died of Parkinson’s disease; she was 68. After a period of mourning, Mr. Bush announced that, to find his way back into “productive service” and “do God’s will,” he would welcome the opportunity to act as commissioner of baseball. But while Commissioner Bud Selig said that he would be honored to yield the position to Mr. Bush, he cautioned that the exigencies of the job would probably require him to remain in office “for another year, or maybe two,” and the question was not raised again.

Mr. Bush was preceded in death by his sister Robin Bush, his brothers John “Jeb” Bush, the former governor of Florida, Neil Bush, and Marvin Bush, and his sister Dorothy Bush Koch. He is survived by his parents.

Structure of the Original Government Being Restored Using the Example of The Republic of Texas

By Anna Von Reitz

Structure of the Original Government Being Restored

Using the Example of The Republic of Texas

First, our Constitution guarantees us a “republican form of government” --- “republican” = Latin, feminine, adjective. This is the form of government provided by the county level local government occupying the soil jurisdiction and is create when (and only when) people claim their birthright political status and join together to create a County Jural Assembly. Please note that our right to peaceably “assemble” is one of the guarantees of all three Constitutions.

So, that means people need to be claiming back their Good Names and Estates and returning --- or, the fancy legal term for the same thing---“re-conveying” your Trade Name to its natural permanent domicile on “land and soil of Texas” or another American state so that you can lawfully act as an Elector and Juror in an American Common Law Court and are lawfully enabled to exercise your right to peaceably assemble and create a County Jural Assembly.

Once you have your County Jural Assembly formed, and a minimum of 26 qualified jurors in your jury pool you can engage in a lawful election process – 30 day Public Notice of Nominations Meeting, closing of nominations, 30 day Public Notice of Election time and place, secure secret paper balloting, election of County Sheriff, Justice(s) of the Peace, Bailiff, Court Clerk, and Coroner.

As the head peacekeeping officer of the actual factual unincorporated County, the Sheriff so elected takes over as the senior and highest ranking Officer of the Law. He must be bonded for his performance of his duties (to protect him from damage claims) and must take the proper non-religious Oath of Office required (our actual government separates Church and State functions so there is no “so help me God” in the lawful Oath of Office). The Sheriff elected by the local County Jural Assembly is then enabled to deputize as many Deputies as needed to keep the peace. He also takes control of the operations of any and all Territorial and Municipal law enforcement agencies operating within his county.

Unlike the “Sheriffs” elected by incorporated Territorial “Counties”, the actual unincorporated County Sheriff is not obligated to kow-tow to any federal agencies that usurp upon his jurisdiction, which includes all local affairs, all non-delegated powers. Generally speaking this means that he rides herd on federal agents and agencies to make sure they are not over-stepping their boundaries and provides the “check” to ensure that things are kept in balance and that Territorial Sheriffs are addressing only Territorial Citizens and territorial issues, such as interstate sale of tobacco, guns, and alcohol.

People often ask why we have to elect County Coroners. We need County Coroners to keep the public records of deaths and probate actions initiated in the County Court, but we also need County Coroners because they are the ones who can impeach and remove a State Governor.

The counties all then come together and select three Deputies each to act as their Fiduciary Officers at the State Assembly level. This is where the State Republic (Latin, masculine, noun) comes into play, as in The Republic of Texas. Just as the Counties occupy the soil jurisdiction, the State Republics occupy the land jurisdiction.

Because our States are Nations, and our Nations are States in America, the words “interstate” and “international” are synonymous. Knowing that, it makes a lot more sense when I tell you that the land jurisdiction is international in nature. The Republic of Texas is responsible for doing the business of the soil jurisdiction people and counties with the rest of the world, including the other States. When the Republic of Texas elects three Delegates to attend a Congress of the States, we are talking about a Continental Congress of the kind that issued The Unanimous Declaration of Independence.

Thus, when we say “land and soil of Texas” we are referring to two related jurisdictions, local and international, occupied by the living people of Texas. The people occupying the land and soil of Texas are self-governing--- meaning that they have organized themselves and have established their own local and state national government to conduct their own business affairs.

Prior to 1851, the “state” created by a statewide assembly of County Deputies of the soil jurisdiction counties was indicated by the use of all small letters: texas, ohio, minnesota, and so on. These bodies are intended to hold the purse strings for the counties on statewide issues and sort out things like apportionments – for example, it would be unreasonable for a sparsely populated county out in West Texas to pay the same apportionment for roads as Dallas-Fort Worth, yet both counties have state roads that need to be maintained.

The international level land jurisdiction State was (and still is) distinguished by the use of a single capital letter in the name: Texas.

The Union formed by these States (Texas, Ohio, Minnesota….et alia) is known as The United States of America (Unincorporated) and please note that these States have never given up one iota of their land or soil jurisdiction.

So, the people delegate some of their power to the local County, the Counties delegate some of their power to the State and the State is a member of a Union of States doing business as The United States of America (Unincorporated) since September 9, 1776.

These States and their people have been at peace since 1814, when the Treaty of Ghent ended the War of 1812.

In view of all the war-mongering and death and destruction that has gone on since 1814, this must come as jaw-dropping news, or else as an absurdity worthy of a good laugh, but it is nonetheless true. So who or what has been doing all the fighting?

The States of States.

Notice there is a state called “texas” also known as The Republic of Texas that results when the soil jurisdiction counties come together in a statewide assembly. There is also a State called “Texas” that results when the counties send elected Fiduciary Deputies to a State Assembly.

So far we haven’t even touched on anything called “State of Texas” have we? That’s because so far, we have only been talking about soil and land jurisdiction states.

The States like Texas and Ohio have a Union called The United States of America which is, like the land jurisdiction States, unincorporated. These are the Sovereign States and the Union of Sovereign States, respectively. This is known as the Federation of States, formed by The Unanimous Declaration of Independence, and it has been this way since 1776.

However, there is another Union called the Confederation of States, that has been doing business almost as long (1781) under the auspices of The Articles of Confederation. This was--- and may be again ---a confederation of National-level States of States operated by the Sovereign States to do business in the international jurisdiction of the sea.

Without leaving its own habitation on the land, the sovereign State called Texas created The State of Texas to represent its interests and conduct its business in the international jurisdiction of the sea.

The State of Texas then joined with The State of Ohio and The State of Wisconsin, et alia, to form the States of America organization. These were all unincorporated businesses chartered by the sovereign States to conduct business, such as international trade, in their behalf.

As they were chartered directly by a sovereign land jurisdiction State to represent its interests, these States of States functioned at the National-level in the international jurisdiction of the sea --- as a counterpart to the States functioning at the National-level in the international jurisdiction of the land.

Texas is part of The United States of America union, The State of Texas is part of the States of America union.

As you can now see, The Republic of Texas derives from the statewide assembly of counties, Texas derives from a State Assembly of county delegates, and The State of Texas results from the Texas State Assembly doing business as The State of Texas. At least, that’s how it worked initially, and how it is supposed to work…..but something happened on the way to the Cotton Market in 1858.

The British Government and many British Peers had invested heavily in the Egyptian cotton industry, in more or less direct competition with American cotton producers --- and they were losing the contest, despite the fact that the Egyptian cotton was far closer to the European markets the British hoped to dominate. As a result, the American cotton producers had to be quashed and regulated so as to open up the European market for British-backed Egyptian cotton to take over---and the British Government and the Peerage to avoid a bath in red ink.

Not unreasonably, the American cotton producing States objected. The so-called “American Civil War” was the result. It had nothing to do with slavery. It was not a war. It was a commercial mercenary conflict staged on our shores by the British-backed Territorial Government against the dissenting members of the States of America, which sought to leave the original Confederation of States and form one of their own.

How do we know that this was never a “war”, but instead a private commercial mercenary conflict? There is no Declaration of War made by any Continental Congress, nor is there any such declaration by any properly seated and empowered National-level Congress of The States of States in Congress Assembled. There is also no Peace Treaty ending any such “war”. And we note that the so-called “Reconstruction Acts” treasonously imposed by the British-backed Territorial Government are still not repealed, providing evidence of ongoing unconstitutional British meddling in our affairs.

The Southern States operating their National-level States of States that were members of the States of America union formed under The Articles of Confederation sought to withdraw and create their own new union called, logically enough, The Confederate States of America.

The British Government was so bent on controlling both our commerce (business between incorporated entities) and dominating our international trade policies (business between unincorporated businesses) that after the hostilities ceased, they usurped against all our National-level States of States (North and South) and moth-balled them, pending their “Reconstruction”, and rolled over all their assets into State Land Trusts operated under names like the “Texas State”.

This gave the appearance that since our National-level States of States were no longer operating in the international jurisdiction of the sea, that our government as a whole was “in abeyance” and being “held in trust” pending “reconstruction”----- and that is how the perpetrators of this massive criminal fraud scheme have presented the situation to the rest of the world for the last 150 years.

They next imposed upon the sovereign States and engineered the writing of new “State Constitutions” which, undisclosed to the people, were not rewrites of the existing National-level State of State Constitutions, but were instead completely new constitutions allowing British-backed Territorial-level State of State organizations to take over and control everything.

The National-level States of States doing business as, for example, The State of Texas, were secretively replaced by Territorial-level States of States doing business as the State of Texas, etc. The names were deliberately and deceptively similar so that to Joe Average nothing appeared to have changed. There was a State of Texas doing business before the “war” and a State of Texas doing business afterward and they appeared to be the same, albeit one was authorized to act in behalf of the actual land jurisdiction State of the Union and one was a foreign, British-backed, unauthorized usurper.

This is in complete Breach of Trust, Fraud, and Violation of Commercial Contract, and it is what must now be addressed by the American People and the sovereign land jurisdiction States of the original unincorporated union of the States doing business as The United States of America.

The aim here is to restore and empower our “missing” National-level States of States to their rightful power and position, enabling them to act in behalf of the actual land jurisdiction States, re-vesting all assets held in the State Land Trusts back to the actual States and people.

That is, the assets held by the Texas State trust must be re-vested to Texas, and the original National-level State of State doing business as The State of Texas must re-vest to take over the bankrupt Territorial State of Texas and liquidated Municipal STATE OF TEXAS assets as the Priority Creditors and Holders in Due Course.

Both The United States of America (Unincorporated) --- the union of the sovereign States, and the sovereign land jurisdiction States individually--- are still operating and still standing peaceably on the land they are heir to. All assets of the Texas State belong to Texas and are not chattel backing the bankruptcy of any Territorial State of Texas or any Municipal STATE OF TEXAS presumed to exist. All assets of The State of Texas likewise belong to Texas despite immoral and despicable British meddling in our national affairs under conditions of Breach of Trust, deceit, fraud, and fraudulent claims of “war”.

And now that we have that clear, The United States of America (Unincorporated), the union of the sovereign States, is directing the international bankruptcy trustees to return the assets held in trust by the Territorial State of Texas and the Municipal STATE OF TEXAS back to Texas, while the people are busily restoring their county jural assemblies and The Republic of Texas, rightfully doing business as Texas and The State of Texas.

Our Government As It Is Supposed to Be:

People

Counties -- republican soil jurisdiction counties

Republics – national soil jurisdiction states – The Republic of Texas/Continental Congress

States – international land jurisdiction States – Texas/United States in Congress Assembled

The United States of America (Unincorporated) A Federation of Sovereign States

-------------------Land jurisdiction above this line, Sea jurisdiction below this line-----------------

The States of America (Unincorporated) A Confederation of Dependent States

States of States (National) owed: The Constitution for the united States of America***

The State of Texas/States of America in Congress Assembled***

States of States (Territorial) owed: The Constitution of the United States of America

(Territorial) State of Texas /United States of America Congress

States of States (Municipal) owed: The Constitution of the United States

STATE OF TEXAS/UNITED STATES CONGRESS

*** Indicates the “missing” National-level States of States, e.g. The State of Texas

Please also note that the soil jurisdiction Republics, like The Republic of Texas, form Continental Congresses when they meet.

The land jurisdiction States like Texas form the United States in Congress Assembled.

The National-level States of States, like The State of Texas, are supposed to form the States of America in Congress Assembled.

The Territorial “State of Texas” was never authorized to exist and neither was the Municipal “STATE OF TEXAS”.

They simply infringed upon our copyrights and usurped our lawful government while taking their paychecks from our pockets using semantic deceits and fraud under Breach of Trust and in violation of Commercial Contract.

---------------------------

See this article and over 900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

This is what Really Is Happening

Corey Goode 2018
This is what Really Is Happening
Below Antarctica

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

ABOUT PRESIDENT TRUMP

Recording of Anna speaking at Texas RT meeting

No audio for first 6 minutes.

The Texas RT guys cut Anna off short when she was just getting into the good stuff with the assemblies. They didn't understand jurisdictions and thought they were facing a challenge by another group instead of understanding the national level assembly has no jurisdiction within any state.

Direct download lnk: https://national-assembly.net/media/annavonreitzintexas.mp4

Right click on the link and "save link as" to save it to your computer. 938meg in size!