Once upon a time before the year 1066 the people of England held
Allodial title to their land. Not even the king could take the land for
not paying a tithe. William the Conquer came in 1066 and stole the Kings
Title and took the land of the people. From William I, 1066, to King
John, 1199, England was in dire straits. It was bankrupt.
The King invoked the Law of Mortmain, the dead man's hand, so people
couldn't pass their land on to the church or anyone else without the
King's permission, (modern day probate?). Without Mortmain the King
would lose the land he controlled. The Vatican didn't like that because
the King owed a lot of pounds to the Vatican.(WHY?)(1). King John
refused to accept The Vatican's representative, Stephen Langton, whom
Pope Innocent III installed to rule England(religious or in fact?)(2) In
1208 England was placed under Papal interdict(?). Interdict means a
prohibition.)
King John was excommunicated and in trying to regain his stature he
groveled before the Pope and returned the title to his kingdoms of
England and Ireland to the Pope as vassals, and swore submission and
loyalty to him. King John accepted Langton as Archbishop of Canterbury,
and offered the Pope a vassal's bond of fealty and homage. Two months
later, in July of 1213, King John was absolved of excommunication, at
Winchester, by the returned Archbishop of Canterbury, Langton. On
October 3, 1213, by treaty, King John ratified his surrender of his
kingdoms to the Pope, as Vicar of Christ who claimed ownership of
everything and everyone on earth as tradition.
Question 1. Where in the Bible did Jesus give any man this kind of power
over all men and land? He didn't. He did not create a religion nor did
he create the office of Pope.
Question 2. Can you have a third party break a contract between you and
another person under duress..? Don't those of you who are forced into a
contract reserve all your rights under modern UCC 1-207 and claim UCC
1-103?
The contract (treaty of 1213) was between two parties. Now the Barons of
England would not put up with being slaves anymore so they took to the
sword and made King John sign the Magna Charta. So doesn't this act of
the Barons violate the principle of natural law, when they created the
Magna Charta, as having no force and effect upon a contract between two
parties? Well Pope Innocent III, the other contracting party thought so,
for he declared the Magna Charta to be: ". . .unlawful and unjust as it
is base and shameful. . . whereby the Apostolic See is brought into
contempt, the Royal Prerogative diminished, the English outraged, and
the whole enterprise of the Crusade greatly imperiled." Quoted from
G.R.C. Davis: Magna Charta. Trustee of the British Museum. London. 1965.
The Pope, in order to introduce strife in England and Ireland that would
help him, used Jesus teachings to his advantage that is verified in the
Gospels by two of His Apostles. So St. Levy (Mark 2:14; Luke 5:27),
alias Matthew, cites Jesus at Matthew 10::34-36 and Luke 12:49, 51-3.
Nothing reveals the antithesis of government and religion more clearly
than these facts.
Question 3. What did the contract of 1213 A.D. create? A TRUST or
CONTRACT. Only the two parties, the King's heirs and the Pope, can break
the contract. For the Trust /Contract cannot be broken as long as there
are heirs to both sides of the contract.
At this time in history we now know who controlled the Kings of England
and the land of the world. For Now we have the Pope claiming the whole
Western Hemisphere besides Europe. The Holy See of Antioch ruled all the
easterly side and the Holy See of Alexandria ruled the western side, so
there was a conflict. (3)
So, on with the story. The King's explorers had come to America to claim
dominion over land by deceiving and murdering the natives, the American
Indians. The King operated under the treaty of 1213 and everything was
going along okay until the 1770's when the bunch of rogues called the
"Founding Fathers" decided they wanted the benefits but not pay the
taxes to the King. They, being lawyers, and professional educated men,
didn't know they were still under the Pope's control? Their lies and
fraud now would affect the American colonies and the people who lived on
the land.
Those common people who fought in the American Revolution were unaware
that the 1213 treaty still ruled despite the fact they THOUGHT the Magna
Charta was a viable piece of work.(4) The Declaration of Rights in 1689
declared the Rights of the British subjects in England. At the end of
the English Declaration it stated at Section III " ...that should any of
the Rights just mentioned be in violation of the HOLY ALLIANCE (1213
Treaty), ...it is as if this Declaration was never written".
So we know that the English Declaration didn't fly, so what makes you
think the 1774 Declaration of Rights in this British Colony would work.
Weren't these people doing the same thing as the Barons did in 1215 A.D.
to King John? A contract is a contract. Look at Article 1, Section 10,
Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution. Can anyone obligate a contract? Were
the "founding fathers" trying to obligate a contract between two parties
that still have heirs living today?
Question 4. How important is the "ultimate benefactor", the Pope, The
HOLY SEE, in the scheme of things? Move through history till modern
times and pull Public Law 88-244, which follows Public Law 88-243 - the
institution of the law- merchants Uniform Commercial Code. Are you
shocked that the Pope is listed in this Public Law?
Doesn't the United States have an ambassador in the Vatican? Why? Is it a
government like all other nations such as France, Japan, Spain or
Brazil? The Vatican runs the world, it controls the British Crown. Is it
any wonder they separate man's Church and government? They don't talk
about the Lord Almighty's Church (government) do they.(5) "Organized
churches" are given special tax privileges because the Vatican dictates
to the sixty United States trustees through the trust document, the U.S.
Constitution created by the 1783 treaty between the King, frontman for
the Vatican, and Adams, Hartly, Laurens, & Franklin who were
operating for the King and not the people of America. Look at Article VI
of the Constitution for the United States for your answer as stated in
the "New History of America".(6)
You see we are still under the Pope who rules over all nations as he
declared he did back in 1213. The 1783 Treaty did say in the opening
statement quoted exactly as it appears in olde English; "It having
pleafed the Divine Providence to difpofe the hearts of the Moft Serene
and Moft Porent Prince, George the Third, by the grace of God, King of
the Great Britain, France and Ireland, Defender, of the Faith , Duke of
Brunfwick and Laurenberg, Arch-Treafurer and PRINCE ELECTOR OF THE HOLY
ROMAN EMPIRE, & C. AND OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, . . .."
(Emphasis added in caps).
Did you catch the last few words? This is from a King (man) who can
supposedly make no claim over the United States of America because he
was defeated? The King claims God gave him the almighty power to say
that no man can ever own property because it, "goes against the tenets
of his church, the Vatican/Holy Roman Empire, because the King is the
"Elector of the Holy Roman Empire’"
What about the secret Treaty of Verona, made the 22nd of November, 1822,
which shows the power of the Pope and the Vatican's interest in the US
Republic.
Here is part of The Secret Treaty of Verona. "The undersigned specially
authorized to make some additions to the treaty of the Holy Alliance,
after having exchanged their respective credentials, have agreed as
follows:
ARTICLE I. The high contracting powers being convinced that the system
of representative government is equally as incompatible with the
monarchial principles as the maxim of the sovereignty of the people with
the divine right, engage mutually, in the most solemn manner to use all
their efforts to put an end to the system of representative
governments, in what ever country it may exist in Europe, and to prevent
its being introduced in those countries where it is not yet known.
ARTICLE 2. As it cannot be doubted that the liberty of the press is the
most powerful means used by the pretended supporters of the rights of
nations to the detriment of those of princes, the high contracting
parties promise reciprocally to adopt all proper measures to suppress
it, not only in their own state but also in the rest of Europe.
ARTICLE 3. Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most
powerfully to keep nations in the state of passive obedience which they
owe to their princes, the high contracting parties declare it to be
their intention to sustain in their respective states, those measures
which the clergy may adopt with the aim of ameliorating their own
interests, so intimately connected with the preservation of the
authority of the princes; and the contracting powers join in offering
their thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for them, and
solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the
nations."
Do we have a false God before us and worship him and his church instead
of the real Lord, Jesus and his government. The divine right of kings
exists in Clinton and every Governor of the states in corporate Union.
Well let me go on record and say that the Lord gave me the same right as
the Pope claims was given to him. Am I not a Steward upon the land of
the Lord as a mere sojourner, the same as the Pope? Are not you also a
Steward?
Did the Lord make a covenant with Adam and Eve to subdue the earth and
reign over the animals and to populate the earth? Doesn't that contract
still exist? And doesn't it exist with you also? And we, the true
believers in that contract, can we take all the nations (mans) laws in
the world and dump them in the ocean to regain our rightful place on
this earth under the Lord's Natural Law to thwart the contract between
King John and the Pope that appears to defeat the original contract the
Lord made with man?
Yes, let us go back to the original contract and destroy the Vatican's
control over everybody. Before 1066 the Pope did not claim all the land
as the people claimed the land and didn't pay taxes on it to anybody.
Didn't the Lord say to the people after coming out of Egypt, "why do you
want a king when you have me and my contract?" Which Lord do you want
to live under, a Pope, a King, President, Governors, Senators,
Representatives, or a real Lord called Jesus Christ. "Christians," are
ridiculed and put down because they read the Word of the Lord correctly
and could defeat even the best the Pope has to throw at them.
The King James version of the Bible is just that. A version concocted by
the King under the guidance of the Pope so as to hide the real truth. I
was taught by the church I went to, which is government controlled as
it has to be by the treaty of 1213 and reiterated in the 1783 Treaty
between The Pope's Elector, King John and the First President of the
United States, Sam Huntington and Charles Thompson, Secretary. I read
the passage, when Jesus was on the cross, from a very old manuscript
that said, "Forgive them NOT, for they know what they do." This is
different than what most people believe he said, "Forgive them for they
know not what they do." Bottom line is that when men write, transcribe,
translate, update, and copy over thousands of years they always alter
the interpretation, words and insert their own meanings. You can see
this in just the 200 years that our country became separated from
England, but still remains a colony under different compact and use of
clever wording. But that is another whole subject that you do not know
about.
Eminent domain and Allodial title:
Why and where did "eminent domain" rear its ugly head? Right after the
King's government was formed here in America. Eminent domain replaced
the Law of Mortmain of England and when government wanted your land they
claimed eminent domain thereby destroying that to what people think
they have allodial title. Allodial title only existed in America when
the King granted the use of the land to the likes of William Penn,
.........
But it could be taken at any time. Are you or were your great, great,
great grandfathers ever free to hold land that could never be taken
away? Ask some of today's farmers and see how many lost their farms to
the government that belonged to their past family and I'll bet none of
the land goes back to the 1789 era. Well it's a wonderful world to live
in the end times, isn't it. Read Revelations to see where the false
preachers come from. Who is the "Harlot" in Revelations?
Does the Vatican come close with a mortal calling himself the "vicar" of Christ?
Here is the definition of vicar in Webster's 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language.
Vicar: "In a general sense, a person deputed or authorized to perform the functions of another; a substitute in office."
The Pope PRETENDS to be vicar of Jesus Christ on earth.
Pretend; To hold out as a false appearance; to offer something feigned
instead of that which is real; To exhibit as a cover for something
hidden."
You bet your life the Pope has something to hide. He is no more powerful
than You. The King is no more powerful than You. The American President
and Governor's are no more powerful than You. You allow THEM run your
lives ...WHY.?
Thinkers, you cannot fight the Pope or the King on their contract even
though you are affected by the contract. You must go elsewhere for
relief. Remember the first contract in history, God with Adam and Eve?
You had better because you were a part of it as an heir and it is your
saving grace. Why do you think the "courts of common law" are despised
and Government and States are taking action to stop them? See where the
power lies when this happens? Clinton, the Governors, and Congress of
the United States and the Legislatures of the several states are only
following orders and delegate to the 60 U.S. Trustees, who always show
up in bankruptcy generated mostly by IRS actions. Isn't that a starting
point?
What do Trustees administer? A trust? The Constitution is a trust,
correct? It was created by the 1783 Treaty, correct? It is not the
private man's trust contract, correct? Only those entering into the
contract are UNDER the constitution and are bound by it, correct? Look
up the definition of "under" in words and phrases and a good dictionary
such as Webster's 1828 at Vol. II, 101. I, my dear readers, am not
"under" some damn corporate trust (constitution) drafted in secrecy by
the King and corporate lawyer esquires (you call them the "Founding
Fathers") whom were controlled by the Treaty of 1213, wherein the
Vatican still ruled over all. It was never "my constitution" and never
will be. The Constitution does not apply to me nor will it ever.
However, some of the states' representatives in 1776 realized that the
Constitution was a commercial contract among the Founding Fathers to
protect their financial interests in the Americas and in Europe. The
Articles of the Bill of Rights is designed to keep those United States
citizens whom are bound by the Constitution (contract) from encroaching
upon my natural Law Rights, (With this hint in mind you may discover
where the IRS gets its purported power that makes you liable, because
you claim to be UNDER the constitution, but they will never admit it
because only a few know the real reason and they are not about to tell
their agents. The same goes for any license issued to you by the
corporate States). I hope you have read the Supreme Court cases of State
and United States cited in my previous books that prove beyond any
shadow of a doubt I am correct in my previous two sentences. Yet you
always fall back into the trap by claiming citizenship of the United
States AND THE STATES.
No! You are not a citizen of the corporate or organic State if you want
to be free. You cannot claim it is your constitution and remain free.
You cannot claim representatives in the legislatures and remain free.
How about your estate? State and Estate come from the same contract.
Webster's 1828 Dictionary defines it;
"ESTA'TE, n. 1. In a general sense, fixedness; a condition; now
generally written and pronounced state. (6) The general interest of
business or government; hence a political body; a commonwealth; a
republic.
But in this sense, we now use State." Get the picture? We are the ryots
tenure holding the "estate" of the King called your estate. Belong to a
body politic and you are a slave. In my previous books I told the people
a "republic" is a fraud, for then you belong to the estate of the King
which makes you a law-merchant holding as a trustee the King's land that
he is holding in trust for the Vatican. The States are the "estate " of
the Vatican/King cabal with the money changers along for the ride are a
full blown consortium which includes the Congress/President/ Governors
et al. I don't want to drive you crazy, since you might not comprehend
all that is here. Once you know the truth and let go of all you were
taught by the government and the preachers you don't become the drowning
man grasping at the lies to stay afloat. Have you ever wondered why you
were sinking while pleading case law and their constitution to protect
you?
Bye till next time,
The Informer
(1)(WHY?). Because the Pope claimed all lands as the vicar of Christ and
the king owed money from the Vatican that was to be collected by the
Church of England. The church reduced their parishioners to mere
serfdom. When they died the church got the property and the King, in
order to preserve what property he had instituted the law of Mortmain.
This prevented the people from willing the land to the Pope. When the
pope got wind of this he excommunicated the King. That's the explanation
for the Why?
(2) This is a fact that is documented in the English documents of History at the Leeds Library.
(3)The conflict between each of the Holy Sees, one controlling the
western front (America) and the other controlling the China side with
the dividing line somewhere in Spain and France through Germany. The
Pope is the figurehead, remember and the best way to explain it is
Congress is Alexandria and the Senate is Antioch.
(4) (Why doesn't the Magna Charta hold more force and effect than a
later contract between the king and the Pope? Because the Pope decreed
it null and void as it would break the contract he had initiated with
the King. The Magna Charta was a contract breaker by third parties and
that was a no-no in any law. Besides the Pope owned England and how
could the Barons take the land that the King pledged let alone all the
surfs that the Pope still controlled through the church of England? He
can't and so the Magna Charta was declared Void. Now the Pope, through
the front man, The King, could create the other contracts called
treaties and no one is the wiser. Remember, the Pope was being
controlled by the creditor, The Rothschilds to whom the Pope was
indebted.
(5) Why? It is clear as a bell. The "church" of GOD is 'Government of
GOD and man created all these religions and made churches for them.
They, man, cannot allow the Government of the Lord "Church upon this
rock" to get in the way of the government of men, now can they?
(6) "New History of America", by The Informer
People you can read this for yourself in American Council of Christian
Laymen: "How Red Is The Federal Council of Churches", Madison,
Wisconsin, 1949. Now you may better understand James Montgomery's latest
as to why all the declarations, Magna Charta, etc. have no effect. Read
on to see why.
See: James Montgomery's - "British Colony III" on the Internet. To
further prove what I say that the declared rights were also at the mercy
of any previous charters or grants from the king of England you must
read section 25 of the 1776 North Carolina Constitution, Declaration of
Rights which states;09"And provided further, that nothing herein
contained shall affect the titles or possessions of individuals holding
or claiming under the laws heretofore in force, or grants heretofore
made by the late King George II, or his predecessors, or the late lords
proprietors, or any of them."
https://forums.national-assembly.net/viewtopic.php?f=264&t=11
EMERGENCY!
You can also watch the exclusive interview below with Caolan Robertson along with the rest of Wednesday’s broadcast of The Alex Jones Show:
EMERGENCY: Tommy Robinson Transferred To Muslim Prison, Facing Certain Death
CONTACT NOW:
PRESIDENT' TRUMPS OFFICE VIA https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/
PENTAGON - MARINES AND ARMY
YOUR CONGRESSMEN
SENATORS
AMBASSADOR TO ENGLAND
NEWS MEDIA
MAKE THIS KNOWN
DEMAND HELP FOR TOMMY TO BE RELEASED
URGENT, PATRIOTS: ACT NOW TO SAVE TOMMY R_BINSON!! #WWG1WGA!!!
Tommy Robinson This guy should be knighted
(Andrew Norfolk (Times)
https://www.infowars.com/tommy-robinson-shipped-to-high-security-muslim-prison-to-be-released-to-general-population/?utm_source=Nightly+Newsletter&utm_campaign=08b90b3bdf-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_06_13_09_09&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_e12661a83c-08b90b3bdf-36410237
