On Oct 16, 2018, at 6:23 AM, Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq. <dr.richard.cordero_esq@verizon.net> wrote:The Federal Judiciary’s institutionalized abuse of power
by its judges dismissing complaints about them,
which ensures their unaccountability,
can be exposed through
J. Kavanaugh and his peers’ dismissal of the 478 complaints about them,
and your protest against
the sham hearing on changes to
the judges’ complaint rules and code of conductByDr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net, DrRCordero@Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org, Corderoric@yahoo.comYou may share and post this article non-commercially
in its entirety, without any addition, deletion, or modification,
with credit to its author, Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.,
and the link to his website: http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org.This article is also at:http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>OL2:773Dear Deans, Professors, Students and Members of the Media, and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries1. I read with interest the articles in The Crimson and those written by others at Yale concerning then-Judge Kavanaugh and the power of law students to cause their deans to take a position on his confirmation, as well as the letters relating to him that more than 2,400 law professors and more than 2,000 Mothers in the Law Profession published in The New York Times(NYT).2. This is a proposal for you, your professors and students, the media, and me to join forces, not to revisit the sexual abuse allegations leveled against him, but rather to use his case to insert into the national debate on the evaluation of judicial candidates’ fitness to serve what is more important: their service.A. Why and how politicians have allowed judges to become unaccountable3. The very politicians who put judges in office cannot thereafter turn around and investigate their appointees for lack of integrity and competence, lest they incriminate their own vetting procedures and skills for evaluating character and competence.4. To evade their responsibility for exercising constitutional checks and balances on ‘our men and women on the bench’, politicians have delegated to judges authority to self-discipline. In the federal government, they have adopted the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980 (28 U.S.C. §§351-364; *> jur:2418a).5. Thereunder, the only way for anybody to complain about a federal judge is by lodging a complaint in the circuit where the judge serves. There it is processed by precisely his or her peers, colleagues, and friends. They are required to submit the statistics of their processing of those complaints to Congress and the public in the Annual Report of the Director [who is appointed by the Supreme Court chief justice] of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (AO; 28 U.S.C. §604(h)(2);jur:2623a).6. Those statistics(†>OL2:772§G) show that Judge Kavanaugh and his peers dismissed 100% of the 478 complaints about them lodged with their District of Columbia Circuit and reported in the annual official statistics for the 1oct06-30sep17 11-year period(OL2:748).7. They have abused their self-disciplining authority to grant themselves 100% exoneration from complaints regardless of the complained-about conduct’s nature, extent, and gravity.8. Acting only in self-interest, he and his peers have left complainants and the rest of the public at the mercy of complained-about judges and their covering-up peers.9. Held by politicians and themselves unaccountable, life-appointed judges, in practice unimpeachable and irremovable(jur:21§a), risklessly abuse(*>OL:154¶3) for their gain and convenience their enormous power over people’s property, liberty, and all the rights and duties that frame their lives.10. Their service is incriminated, not by an individual’s allegations and partisan opinions, but by their own non-partisan, verifiable, and official statistics. The latter’s analysis through "the math of abuse" exposes them as Judges Above theLaw.11. This novel statistics-based approach to judicial service evaluation is the product and distinguishing feature of my study of judges and their judiciaries, titled and downloadable thus:Exposing Judges' Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Wrongdoing:
Pioneering the news and publishing field
of judicial unaccountability reporting* †* Volume 1:http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf >all prefixes:page # up to OL:393† Volume 2:B. Supreme Court justices’ self-interested cover-up of abusive dismissal of complaints about them and their peers12. Justice Kavanaugh now has the strongest personal motive to prevent any investigation into his and his peers’ abuse of power to secure his and his peers’ 100% exoneration from complaints about them. Such investigation can force the disclosure of the complaints, conveniently kept secret; make the detection of patterns and trends of abuse possible; and lead to the exposure of the organization and execution of, and benefits from, their cover-up.13. Nor can Justice Gorsuch, who comes from the 10th Circuit, allow such investigation. There he, who so values camaraderie(†>OL2: 546¶¶4-6), and his peers dismissed 99.83% of complaints about themselves(OL2:548).14. This explains why the 15 complaints about Judge Kavanaugh lodged in the last month that his peer, Judge Karen Henderson, referred to Chief Justice John Roberts, were in turn referred by him for processing to precisely the 10th Circuit.15. The presumption of a whitewash would not be less justified if C.J. Roberts had referred them to the Second Circuit, the former circuit of Justice Sotomayor. While there, she and her peers denied 100%(jur:11) of petitions for review of dismissal ofcomplaints about themselves (jur:65§§1-3). The percentage of complaints dismissed in all the circuits is 99.82%(jur:10, 12-14).C. The short notice of one single hearing on changes to the rules for processing complaints and the judges’ code of conduct: a sham!16. The exposés of Harvey Weinstein’s sexual abuse and its cover-up by VIPs published by NYT and The New Yorker pressured C.J. Roberts into referring for sexual misconduct investigation Former 9th Cir. Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, who then resigned.17. The almost 700 letters of complaint about abuse in the Federal Judiciary submitted to the C.J. caused him to admit to abuse therein and to set up a study committee(†>OL2:645). Its report has led to proposed changes to the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges and the Judicial Conduct and Disability Rules for processing complaints.18. Only as recently as October 2 did the Administrative Office announce only on its website that the changes will be the subject of only one single hearing at the Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building in Washington, D.C., rather than at each of the more than 200 federal courts.19. How many people can afford to travel to D.C. at all, never mind do so the day before to be ready to testify at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, October 30, for only a few minutes?20. Any request to be heard must be emailed by October 18 toCodeandConductRules@ao.uscourts.gov; for the first week, a ‘glitch’ prevented AO’s receipt of those emails; http://www.uscourts.gov/news/2018/10/02/judiciary-hold-public-hearing-proposed-changes-judges-code-and-judicial-conduct.21. This has been an announcement pro forma about compliance in bad faith with the hearing requirement. It is a sham!22. No change to the Code or the Rules will stop judges from dismissing complaints about themselves, just as the changes adopted in 2008 and 2015 did not.23. Such dismissal is their institutionalized mechanism for enforcing the complicit agreement through which judges reciprocally ensure their unaccountability for their past abuse and the risklessness of their future abuse. Abuse of power is the modus operandi(OL2:457§D, 760) of Powerful Judges Who Can Do No Wrong.D. The MeToo! movement’s emergence as precedent for We the Peopleto hold our abusive judicial public servants accountable24. The media and students have shown to have the power to draw public attention to abuse. You, law professors and students, and we lawyers have the duty to expose abuse by judges, the ones who run(OL2: 717) our profession andcorrupt it by ensuring their impunity.25. Your publication of this letter and one or more of my articles(OL2:755, 719§C) and your protest against the sham hearing can launch a generalized media investigation into judges' abuse of power akin to the one into sexual abuse sparked by NYT’s and The New Yorker’s publication of their exposés. Just days later, the MeToo! movement emerged. It has led to a historic societal transformation from silent sexual abusees to a national public that shouts:Enough is enough!
We won’t take any abuse by anybody anymore.26. That is precedent for the reasonable expectation that if we join forces to expose judges’ abuse of power using J. Kavanaugh’s dismissal of complaints as a test case, we may bring about a historic transformation:27. We can insert this issue into the mid-term elections, the national debate, and the presidential campaign; and enable We the People for the first time ever to hold our judicial public servants accountable.28. We may expose what will be a national scandal: judges’ interception of their critics’ communications to each other and to others –did you receive my previous ones to you?-, shown by a statistical study and verifiable by Information Technology experts examining computers and servers(†>OL2:775).29. Thus, I respectfully request that you publish this email and call me(*>jur:1) to invite me to make a presentation to you and your school members and media colleagues. Time is of the essence.Dare trigger history!(*>jur:7§5)...and you may enter it.
* http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdfVisit the website at, andsubscribe for free to its series of articles thus:http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org >+ New or Users >Add NewPut your money
where your outrage at abuse
and quest for justice are.Donate
to Judicial Discipline Reform’s
professional research and writing effort
to advance our common interest in exposing
unaccountable judges’ riskless abuse of power
I look forward to hearing from you. Kindly send any reply to this block of my email addresses: Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net, DrRCordero@Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org, CorderoRic@yahoo.com.Sincerely,Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
Saturday, October 20, 2018
The Federal Judiciary’s institutionalized abuse of power
Q Powerful Reminder of What End Goal of Storm Looks Like
Truth and Art TV Patriot News headlines and the latest updates on the Trump Storm/Great Awakening. Recorded Monday night 10-15-18
IMPACT OF A STRANGE OBJECT ON THE MOON WHILE YOUTUBE CUT THE TRANSMISSION
shared by http://oom2.com
Published on Oct 18, 2018
IMPACT OF A STRANGE OBJECT ON THE MOON WHILE YOUTUBE CUT THE
TRANSMISSION MYSTERIOUS IMPACT ON THE MOON, ALIENS UFO OR HUMAN "All i
know is that YT was down for 2 hours cos there was a video uploaded of the
impact and it went viral." The live broadcast reached more than 100K viewers
before YouTube stopped shortly after the alleged impact. ASTEROID OR MISSILE
https://youtu.be/lM7aEI-_l0g
A mysterious, paralyzing disease hits the US By Strange Sounds
shared by http://oom2.com
The CDC warns against a new illness that can cause paralysis
in children, BUT A DISEASE WITH NO KNOWN CAUSE?
A mysterious polio-like illness is on the rise in the U.S.,
mainly impacting young children. By Joe Raedle/Getty Images
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is warning
against a mysterious new illness that’s appeared in children in 22 states this
year and is quickly spreading across the US. [Vox]
So far, the CDC has received 127 reports of suspected cases
of the disease, which is called acute flaccid myelitis. AFM is a polio-like
condition that affects the nervous system and may cause paralysis. [Twitter]
Ninety percent of the afflicted patients are under the age
of 18. The cause of AFM is still unknown, as patients have not tested positive
for polio, but doctors suspect it’s a virus. Though there’s no vaccine to treat
it so far, most children recover quickly. [ABC News]
AFM first grabbed attention in 2014 with 120 reported cases.
Yet the condition indicates an every-other-year pattern, with the number of
afflicted patients dropping every year and spiking the following one. [NBCNews]
The 2014 increase coincided with a national outbreak of a
severe respiratory illness caused by another non-polio virus, the enterovirus
D68. People are more likely to get infected by D68 during the fall. [CNN]
Minnesota, which previously saw only one case of AFM a year,
now has seven confirmed cases of the virus, according to state officials.
[KNSI]
We are creating some weird superbugs that are going to kill
all of us (or let’s stay positive… almost all of us)!
Thanks to: http://strangesounds.org
[Note: If you are unfamiliar with natural alternatives i.e. Colloidal Silver and natural anti-biotic herbs go to my website: http:soaringspirit.webstarts.com click on my articles here I show you how to make your own anti-biotic's which you will have on hand whenever you need them. Many Blessings. Nikki G.]
Revelation The Movie free replay Oct 20, 2018 till Oct 21, 2018 don't miss this!
Episode 7: Heal Cancer with Clean Electricity, Unique Water, Natural Sunlight & Combining Superfoods
Q&A with Ty and Charlene: Part 1, Saturday at 12PM Eastern
Q&A with Ty and Charlene: Part 2, Sunday at 12PM Eastern
Confirmed: The Original Thirteenth Amendment Was Ratified And Then Improperly Removed From The Constitution: The Event Chronicle
shared by Arnie Rosner at: http://scannedretina.com
From a patriot who knows… And so does Heritage - they too act with unclean hands!!! Who but the IMPOSTORS would dare commit acts of fraud and treason against the American people??
_______________
hi arnie i'm not able to share the free digital guide to the constitution because their work does not include the original 13th amendment CONFIRMED: The Original Thirteenth Amendment Was Ratified, And Then Improperly Removed From The Constitution » The Event Chronicle
The Original 13th Amendment
If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any person, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them or either of them.
Did the unlawful removal occur because it outlawed BAR-registered attorneys in the United States?
__
On Tuesday, October 16, 2018 1:08 PM, Arnie Rosner <arnie@arnierosner.com> wrote:
Excuse me… Conservative intelligence Briefing and Heritage Foundation —
<Capto_Capture 2018-10-16_12-58-54_PM.jpg>
What we have going on is a case of the attempts by criminal impersonators — IMPOSTORS — to over-throw the Trump administration by other than lawful means!
THAT IS A MATTER OF SEDITION AND TREASON!
CRIMES — NOT POLITICS!!!!
THAT IS A DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND!
AS THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — WHAT PART OF THE BASIC PREMISE DO YOU PRETEND NOT TO UNDERSTAND?
This IS A MATTER OF SEDITION AND TREASON! NOT THE BS YOU ARE ATTEMPTING TO SELL THE PEOPLE!!!
ARE YOU NOT ENGAGING IN SEDITION AS YOU PUBLISH THESE UNTRUTHS?
ARE YOU NOT OPERATING WITH UNCLEAN HANDS?
Please tell me - and the American people I am wrong!
__
__
arnie
714-964-4056 24/7
______________________
Friday, October 19, 2018
How to grow Luffa sponges! (No they’re not from the ocean!)
“Late Bloomer” follows Kaye’s journey to grow food in her Los Angeles front yard and exists to inspire anyone to grow their own food.
shared by: http://www.selfreliancecentral.com
see a thriving loofa farm here: http://www.selfreliancecentral.com/2018/10/15/how-to-grow-luffa-sponges/?utm_source=181018SRCPMGLASSES3&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=181018SRCPMGLASSES3
NANCY PELOSI TOLD TO GET OUT BY CUBAN AMERICANS IN MIAMI
Looks like the Dem's are getting a taste of their own actions, bout time.
Democrats, how does it feel to be Attacked!
The Patriot Hour - Streamed Live 9 hours ago
______________________________________________
From: Lea; via Pastor Lee S Gliddon Jr
Re: THIS YOUTUBE WILL MAKE YOUR DAY...
--
Pastor Lee S Gliddon Jr
God's Word Christian Ministry
Conservative Patriot > http://conpats.blogspot.com
God's Word Christian Ministry
Conservative Patriot > http://conpats.blogspot.com
About Federal Code....
By Anna Von Reitz
The first thing every
American has to know about Federal Code is that only about 10% of all
the Federal Code--- only those General Session Laws posted in the
Federal Register -- ever applied to us.
The rest is and always was just internal rules and rule-making for federal employees and dependents.
The
second thing that every American needs to know is that the "Revised
United States Statutes" that would have applied to us were never in fact
adopted or "revised" because neither the Territorial Congress nor the
Municipal Congress had authority to "revise" anything done by our actual
Federal Congress prior to 1860. So the old "unrevised" Federal US
Statutes-at-Large still stand.
The
third thing every American needs to know is the organization that
promoted and developed all the rest of the Federal Code structure from
1860 to 1999, went totally out of business when its bankruptcy settled
November 7, 1999, and all those rules --- all fifty (50) "Titles" worth
--- became "discretionary" -- that is, something that federal employees
are taught as standards, but not obligatory.
The
fourth thing that every American needs to know is that you look like
complete idiots when you go around quoting these defunct federal rules
and codes. Why? Because you are like Dutchmen lecturing Australian
Aborigines about their own history, and they could care less.
Just stop.
These people are your employees and that is what you need to drum into their thick, thick, thick heads.
For the General Staff About Nathan Rothschild:
By Anna Von Reitz
For the General Staff About Nathan Rothschild:
There
are some of you who were very relieved when Nathan Rothschild stepped
forward and agreed to front the expenses for the Scottish Interlopers
doing business as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LLC.
You
were duped into believing that this country was bankrupt and that you
had to go lick his boots for funding to "defend" America.
Not
so. Mr. Rothschild and the European banking community as a whole are
in fact our greatest debtors and owe the most money to this country, and
to our lawful government, The United States of America
[Unincorporated].
What they are offering is to give you some of our money at interest and let you work for them, instead of us.
Uh-duh.
Did all your mothers drop you on your heads? Simultaneously? Or are you simply traitors in American uniforms?
What
should be happening is that you should be pressing Rothschild out of
his ill-gotten "middleman" position and forcing him to not only make our
American assets available to the actual American Government --- The
United States of America [Unincorporated]--- but also make arrangements
to start paying back what he owes us and has owed us since 1840.
Furthermore,
even if it means "picking shit with the chickens" for a while, no
officer in our military should ever agree to place yourselves or our
Armed Forces under the thumb and forefinger of any foreign power, much
less a foreign banker loyal to a Queen who is in flagrant Breach of
Trust and busily defrauding Americans both at home and abroad.
We
do not agree to contract with any of the Rothschild interests, British
or French, which means that any money they use to support either "The
Republic" which I more correctly call "Le Republique" or THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA, LLC from Scotland, had better be their own money and
not one penny of ours or any penny derived from our assets.
You
should all be most anxious to bust loose our assets which are being
unjustifiably and illegally held captive by the same bankers who are
trying to seduce you into working for them instead of the American
States and People.
Anything
less on your parts would be disloyalty to the American States and
People, which in our book, counts as mutiny and treason against the
sovereign States of the Union.
We
will also point out that as our Delegated Powers have returned to us
via Operation of Law, you need to get a new contract from us to provide
us with military services and absent that, you have no jobs.
We
will have to hire other military service providers if you don't get
your tails in a knot and go get our assets back from the Queen and these
endlessly crafty bankers.
You
have thirty (30) days to: (a) negotiate a new service contract with us;
(b) at our direction and with our help reopen our asset accounts in
this country; and (c) get your heads out of your asses.
The Paperwork Debate:
By Anna Von Reitz
The Paperwork Debate
Incredibly,
despite the actual experience of literally millions of Americans, there
are still millions more who need to get the message.
These
quasi-governments operating on our shores to provide "government
services" are not Common Law entities so trying to do anything in Common
Law has no effect. None. Writs bounce off. Rights are ignored.
You
have all been kidnapped and shanghaied into a foreign jurisdiction with
the result that none of these idealistic ideas about "Common Law" and
individual rights or Constitutional guarantees apply.
Imagine being kidnapped and finding yourself aboard a Chinese fishing trawler where everyone speaks nothing but Chinese?
That's
where we all start out-- in a completely foreign place operating under
foreign commercial law and being forced to deal with foreign language.
The
situation is only made worse because the foreign language is
superficially similar to English and until we learn "Legalese" we are
constantly at a disadvantage, because certain words no longer mean what
we think they mean.
Who
knew, for example, that the word "person" means "corporation"? So your
"personal bank account" means "corporate bank account"?
Or
that a "not guilty" plea means "guilty" by default? You need to enter a
plea of "Innocent" if that's what you mean, but nobody on the opposing
team of privateers is going to tell you that.
People
who cannot or will not deal with the reality of this situation just get
slaughtered by it. They are defenseless and unable to respond and have
no evidence on the public record to back up their claims to be treated
any differently or under any other law but commercial law.
This is all dictated by the registration of your name and the issuance of a Birth Certificate.
Unless
you take steps as outlined to reclaim your own name and establish your
permanent domicile on the land and soil of your birth state, you are at
the mercy of these fiends and have no recourse.
And no right to participate in the land jurisdiction government, either.
After all, what right does a Chinese fisherman have to serve on an American Jury?
People
have got to wake up, face facts, and deal with them. All this
airy-fairy 'what I was taught in grade school' and the 'Bible is my
defense' stuff does not work against these animals in suits.
They
will be quick to prosecute anyone mis-identified as "one of theirs"---
look at what happened to Schaefer Cox and the Colorado Nine?
Even
after you do the paperwork, you have to learn how to use it and bring
it into evidence and shove it down their throats. These people make
their livings off of preying upon defenseless Americans and they don't
go down easily. The only thing they are really afraid of is exposure.
They
are afraid of having a lot of people know what they are doing and how
they are doing it and that is about the only thing they are afraid of.
Which
means that all Americans need to wise up. All Americans need to record
their actual political status and domicile. All Americans need to push
back and getting their own paperwork in order is Job One to be able to
do that.
So
enough of the "debate" over whether or not you "have to" correct the
public record and declare your political status as an American. If you
have been issued a British Territorial Birth Certificate there is
absolutely no doubt that yes, you do need to record your actual
political status on the public record.
Besides,
unless you are a Brit trying to infiltrate and otherwise mess up the
American Jural Assembly process, why would you have any objection to
declaring your political status and nationality as an American?
Why,
in God's name, would any American prefer to have the same political
status as a Puerto Rican? Especially now that Puerto Rico is bankrupt
and at the mercy of Secondary Creditors of the Queen?
Wake up
and listen to what I am telling you all--- and get moving. Get your
paperwork on the public record so that you have evidence of your claim
and stop milling like cattle in a feed lot.
You already know for sure what happens to cattle in a feed lot and I should not have to say one more word.
The
paperwork is necessary and the paperwork is only "First Base". Once
that is done you have a lot more work to do to educate yourselves and
get in position to blow these British Privateers out of the water.
It may
well be a daunting task, but it is still a task that has to be done. So
buck up and do it. Those of you who have talent for pushing paper, help
the others. There is safety in numbers, so the more people you can get
on the public record as Americans, the more on your side of the fence.
And the fewer "British inhabitants" there are. Kill them off the same way they have offered to kill you ---- on paper.
WATCH LIVE: President Donald Trump Holds MAGA Rally in Missoula, MT 10-18-18
10/19/18 Trump comes out at: 2:43
Here's how much red tape has been cut by the Trump administration
| Dear Self-Reliant Thinker,
Regulation is the perfect symbol of Washington's decades-long power grab. Now, 21 months into the Trump Presidency, regulatory reform hassaved American families and business owners $33 billion.
Compare that with the Obama record: In his first 21 months in office, President Obama imposed $245 billion in regulatory costs on the American people.
President Trump backed up his campaign talk with a specific promise, pledging that his government would cut two regulations each year for every new one added. The results? The Trump Administration issued 176 deregulatory actions last year-eliminating 12 regulations for every new one.
Look at some of money we've saved. (Now how can we make Congress reduce spending?)
Click here to learn more |
|
|
Gold Alert: Central Bank Increases Reserves By 1000%
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
