Sent to us from a regular reader of NESARA for your information ...............
Worse than Treason
WikiLeaks released documents explaining why U.S. AIRCRAFT were never sent to rescue the USA embassy and Ambassador Stevens under attack in Benghazi.
President Obama and Hillary Clinton had a secret reason to order a stand down of the rescue troops.
July 25th, 2012 a Chinook helicopter was taken down by one of the US own Stinger Missiles, but the idiot Taliban didn’t arm the missile and the Chinook didn’t explode, but was forced to land anyway from impact damage. An ordnance team recovered the serial number off the missile which led back to a cache of Stingers being kept in Qatar by the CIA.
At 9:40 PM, September 11, 2012, members of Ansar al-Sharia attacked the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi resulting in the deaths of U.S Ambassador to Libya John Christopher Stevens and U.S. Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith.
At around 4:00 AM on September 12, the group launched a mortar attack against a CIA annex approximately one mile away, killing CIA contractors Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty and wounding ten others.
Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode and sent Ambassador John Christopher “Chris” Stevens to Benghazi post haste in order to retrieve US made Stinger missiles supplied to Ansar al Sharia without Congressional oversight or permission. Hillary Clinton brokered the deal through Stevens and a private arms dealer named Marc Turi. Some of the shoulder fired missiles ended up in Afghanistan being used against American’s own military. This was a “do-or-die” mission, which explains the stand down orders given to multiple commando teams.
It was the State Dept, not the CIA that supplied them to the USA sworn enemies, because David Howell Petraeus, director of the Central Intelligence Agency wouldn’t supply these deadly weapons due to their potential use on commercial aircraft. Then, Obama threw David Petraeus under the bus after he refused to testify that he confirmed their Bullshit smokescreen quoting points about a spontaneous uprising due to some YouTube video.
Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton committed treason. THIS is what the investigation is all about, why she had a private computer server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and why Obama, two weeks after the Benghazi attack, told the United Nations, sticking to the smokescreen YouTube video, knowing full well it was all lies.
Further - the Taliban knew that this administration aided and abetted the enemy without Congressional approval when Congressman John Andrew Boehner created the Select Committee, and the Taliban began pushing the Obama Administration for release of five Taliban Generals.
Just days after U.S. Army Private First Class Bowe Bergdahl went missing from his base in Afghanistan in 2009, the men in his platoon were ordered to sign papers vowing to never discuss what he did or their efforts to track him down. Bergdahl was just a pawn and a traitor.
President Obama is not only corrupt but compromised, Hillary Clinton exposed as a serial liar, perjuring herself multiple times at the hearings.
This would explain why no US military aircraft were NOT called in – the administration knew their enemies had US made Stinger Missiles.
America now may have not only it’s first woman president but the package contains an habitual liar running their country with her finger on the button.
Your vote can stop this before you won’t have a USA.
Visit Wikileaks Hillary Clinton database of emails – [Click Here]
More Hillary Lies and Corruption
From the desk of Julian Assange
Part 1 of the Podesta Emails comprises 2,060 emails and 170 attachments and focuses on Mr Podesta’s communications relating to nuclear energy, and media handling over donations to the Clinton Foundation from mining and nuclear interests; 1,244 of the emails reference nuclear energy. The full collection includes emails to and from Hillary Clinton.
In April 2015 the New York Times published a story about a company called “Uranium One” which was sold to Russian government-controlled interests, giving Russia effective control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for the production of nuclear weapons, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of US government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off the deal was the State Department, then headed by Secretary Clinton. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) comprises, among others, the secretaries of the Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy.
As Russian interests gradually took control of Uranium One, millions of dollars were donated to the Clinton Foundation between 2009 and 2013 from individuals directly connected to the deal including the Chairman of Uranium One, Ian Telfer. Although Mrs Clinton had an agreement with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors to the Clinton Foundation, the contributions from the Chairman of Uranium One were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons.
When the New York Times article was published the Clinton campaign spokesman, Brian Fallon, strongly rejected the possibility that then-Secretary Clinton exerted any influence in the US goverment’s review of the sale of Uranium One, describing this possibility as “baseless”.
Mr. Fallon promptly sent a memo to the New York Times with a rebuttal of the story (Podesta Email ID 1489). In this memo, Mr. Fallon argued: “Apart from the fact that the State Department was one of just nine agencies involved in CFIUS, it is also true that within the State Department, the CFIUS approval process historically does not trigger the personal involvement of the Secretary of State. The State Department’s principal representative to CFIUS was the Assistant Secretary of State for Economic, Energy and Business Affairs. During the time period in question, that position was held by Jose Fernandez. As you are aware, Mr Fernandez has personally attested that “Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter.”
What the Clinton campaign spokesman failed to disclose, however, was the fact that a few days before sending his rebuttal to the New York Times, Jose Fernandez wrote on the evening of the 17 April 2015 to John Podesta following a phone call from Mr Podesta (Email ID 2053): “John, It was good to talk to you this afternoon, and I appreciate your taking the time to call. As I mentioned, I would like to do all I can to support Secretary Clinton, and would welcome your advice and help in steering me to the right persons in the campaign”.
Five days after this email (22 April 2015), Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon wrote a memo to the New York Times, declaring that “Jose Fernandez has personally attested that ‘Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter’,” but Fallon failed to mention that Fernandez was hardly a neutral witness in this case, considering that he had agreed with John Podesta to play a role in the Clinton campaign.
The emails show that the contacts between John Podesta and Jose Fernandez go back to the time of internal Clinton campaign concern about the then-forthcoming book and movie “Clinton Cash” by Peter Schweizer on the financial dealings of the Clinton Foundation.
In an email dated 29 March 2015 (Email ID 2059), Jose Fernandez writes to Podesta: “Hi John, I trust you are getting a brief rest after a job well done. Thanks no doubt to your recommendation I have joined the CAP [Center for American Progress] board of trustees, which I’m finding extremely rewarding.” (Should be included in all investigations.)
Julian Assange
https://cairnsnews.org/2016/10/23/wikileaks-hillary-clintons-emails-the-world-needs-to-read/
