Showing posts sorted by date for query Sovereignty and the Crown. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query Sovereignty and the Crown. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Friday, June 15, 2018

Fifty Shades of Black and White - Crime Report and Notices to JBER and JAG

 
By Anna Von Reitz
 
 
Last night we encouraged readers to get moving and start informing those responsible for the existence of The Mess and for cleaning up The Mess.  Never ones to tell others to do something while standing idly by, we got busy and sent the follow 50 Point Crime Report and related Notices to the officials at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson and their JAG Units. 

Now, not everyone has done all that we've done, but others have done more in other areas and others have followed different paths to the same destinations and it behooves all of us to take action.  If all you feel competent to do is send on a copy of our Crime Report to your base and naval commanders and politicians and police captains--- be our guest. 

Dateline: June 14, 2018:

The following Crime Report and Notices were:
Sent to: 673abw.cso.ice@us.af.mil and 673abw.actionline@us.af.mil

Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents:

President Donald Trump
c/o The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

    Joint Staff Public Affairs
    9999 Joint Staff Pentagon, Room 2D932
    Washington DC, 20318-9999


We have uncovered evidence of gross negligence, criminal Breach of Trust, and dereliction of duty with respect to the people of Alaska and The United States of America.  We have been mischaracterized and kidnapped and human trafficked into foreign jurisdictions by undeclared Foreign Agents, right under the noses of the military and police authorities responsible for protecting us against such attacks.

It is now necessary for us to serve Notice of Liability to Principals and the Agents of the Territorial and Municipal United States, their Trustees in Bankruptcy, and their UN Appointees:

1. It is a fact established by the Public Records and the testimonies of hundreds of credible people that the Federal United States Government meant to exercise the Delegated Powers was usurped upon by the Territorial United States in 1860 and that that honorable government has been "held in abeyance" and in a state of incompetence ever since;

2. It is a fact established by the public statements of President Barack Obama that the Municipal United States was entered into bankruptcy in 2015;

3. It is a fact established by the public statements of President Donald Trump that the Territorial United States was entered into bankruptcy in 2017;

4. Therefore it is a fact that all three levels of the Federal Government exercising Delegated Powers of The United States of America have been rendered incompetent at the same time;

5. Therefore it is a fact that all Delegated Powers have by Operation of Law returned to the Source of the Original Delegation: The United States of America, [Unincorporated];

6. We have acknowledged, accepted, and retained the Delegated Powers and all properties, trusts, assets, and material interests owed to the American States and People without exception;

7. We have long prior to this served Due Process and Due Notice and have reclaimed our birthright political status upon the land and soil of our native states of the United States formed in 1776 and resumed operation of The United States of America [Unincorporated];

8. This Notice shall serve as additional Notice to all Alaskan and US and UN Port Authorities of our return to the land and soil jurisdiction of the actual, factual United States and our in full life competency and standing;

9. This Notice shall serve as additional Notice to all Alaskan and US and UN Police Authorities and Agency Personnel of our return to the land and soil jurisdiction of the actual, factual United States and our in full life competency and standing;

10. The Notice shall serve as additional Notice to all Alaskan and US and UN Civil Officials and Contractors and Agency Personnel of our return to the land and soil jurisdiction of the actual, factual United States and our in full life competency and standing;

11. We are now fulfilling our Public Duty to Report Crime on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways and also Crime committed against us on the Land belonging to The United States of America [Unincorporated};

12. We testify that we have been with malice aforethought press-ganged into involuntary foreign servitude without our knowledge or consent via undisclosed and unconscionable commercial contracts imposed upon us by undeclared privateers acting as inland pirates;

13. We testify that this crime occurred while we were still babies in our cradles;

14. We testify that the nature of this crime is fully documented by the history summarized here:

In terms of the history of Birth Certificates, Settlement Certificates and diminishing, tricking, deceiving, lying, seizing, condemning and cursing free people as slaves, wards, infants, cattle, poor and commodities: (i) In 1535 (27Hen.8 c.28) King Henry VIII of England and his Venetian/Magyar banking advisers seized the property of the poor and common farmers under the pretext they were “small religious estates”. By 1539 (31Hen.8 c.13) he did the same for large religious estates. By 1540, (32Hen.8 c.1), all property was to be owned through “Estates” effectively being Welfare Funds granted by the Crown to the Benefit of use of Subjects with the most common being Estates for the non wealthy now considered “Wards of the Estate”.
Then in 1545 (37Hen.8 c.1) King Henry VIII reintroduced a title directly and solely connected to the slave trade of Rome, abolished by emperors and forbidden under Christian law called the “Custos Rotulorum” meaning literally “Keeper of the Slave Rolls” into every county, to maintain records of the Poor now as slaves. The same sacrilegious, immoral, ecclesiastically unlawful positions continued into the 21st Century as connected with Birth Certificates; and (ii) In 1547 (1Ed.6 c.3) ,
Edward VI issued a new statute that did forbid people considered poor from travelling, except for work, or from claiming their own time and activities and whether or not to work. All people (except those members of the ruling elite, particularly those non-Christian sects from Pisa, Venice and parts of Spain responsible for wholly false religious and legal texts) now declared slaves were either to be gainfully employed in the service of some lord or master, to work to death, or if they were found to be idle, or enjoying life then they were to be seized and permanently branded with a “V” and either sold as a slave or exterminated.
The only exception to the rule, were those men who chose to dedicate themselves to support the status quo and become educated and knowledgeable in the false texts and false scriptures of the slave masters. This act was supposed to have been repealed in 1549 (3&4Ed.6 c.16). However, the act was then restored to full effect in 1572 (14El. c.5) and through subsequent repeals of repeals, remains in force; and (iii) Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, a set of measures were introduced which had the effect of accelerating the disenfranchisement of land peasants into landless paupers.
In 1589 (31El c. 7) peasants then required local parish permission to erect dwellings whereas before the erection of a dwelling by a land peasant on their lord's land was considered a "right". As a result, the ranks of the landless poor, or "paupers" swelled as available to be press-ganged into work; and (iv) To placate the overwhelming hostility against England as a hellhole of slavery, exploitation and superstition, a new act was introduced in 1601 (43El. c.2 and “secret version” as 43 El. c.3) to begin to industrialize, hide and franchise slavery with the introduction of “overseers” of the poor as the foremen over the slaves, under a “cleric” of the parish and the renaming of children sold as sex slaves and workers to be called “Apprentices”.
Thus the Apprenticeship system was invented not to improve conditions, but to “rebrand” slavery under the NonChristian English-Venetian-Pisan model of commerce. The act also introduced a new levy, collected by Parishes was called the "Poor Rates" (now called "council taxes") against wealthy property owners for their “rent” of use of the poor as slaves. This is the financial origin of Annuities 100 years later; and (v) Under Charles II of England, the concept of “Settlements” as plantations of working poor controlled by the Church of England was further refined in 1662 (14Car.2 c.12) including for the first time the issuance of “Settlement Certificates” equivalent to a “birth certificate, passport and social security” rolled into one document. A child's birthplace was its place of settlement, unless its mother had a settlement certificate from some other parish stating that the unborn child was included on the certificate.
However from the age of 7 upward the child could have been apprenticed and therefore “sold into servitude” for some rent paid back to the church as “poor taxes”. The act also made it easier for the “clearing of common houses of the poor” and for the first time made the definition of poor the value of tenancy being a taxable value of less than £10 per year. The act also modified the age of “emancipation” from child slavery to adult slavery as the age of 16; and (vi) Under the draconian and morally repugnant dictates of 1662 (14Car.2 c.12), no one was allowed to move from town to town without the appropriate “Settlement Certificate”.
If a person entered a parish in which he or she did not have official settlement, and seemed likely to become chargeable to the new parish, then an examination would be made by the justices (or parish overseers). From this examination on oath, the justices would determine if that person had the means to sustain himself. The results of the examination were documented in an Examination Paper. As a result of the examination the intruder would then either be allowed to stay, or would be removed by means of what was known as a Removal Order, the origin of the modern equivalent of an “Eviction and Removal Notice” when a sheriff removes people from their home; and (vii) In 1667 (19Car.2 c.4) the concept of “workhouses” were formalized and licensed as being effectively the very worst and hellish places where people considered “prisoners” could be “legally” and effectively worked to death for the profit of the elite pirates and thieves, under the full endorsement by the Church of England.
This is the act that invented the concept of “Employment” and an expansion of the highly profitable white slavery business models of English aristocracy. Thus, people who were taken into custody by virtue of being poor, were expected to work as well as live in conditions as traumatic and evil as any in civilized history; and (viii) The abuse of poor prisoners through the “workhouses” employment model was extremely profitable and a new act was required in 1670 (22Car.2 c.18) to regulate the corporations “renting” of prisoners as “employees” for profit, particularly in the paying of their accounts to the Crown; and (ix) Previous acts were continued and some made perpetual such as the controls over paperwork and “Settlement Certificates” as the origin and ancestor of Birth Certificates by James II in 1685 (1J.2. c. 17) as one of the few acts that the ruling elite permitted to remain as an active Statute of Westminster under his reign; and (x) Under William and Mary of Orange in 1691 (3W&M c.11), the acts of workhouses and abuse of the poor were continued and further refined, with greater oversight on paperwork and accounting for poor entering and leaving parishes, to prevent fraud by overseers and corporations; and (xi) In 1697 (3W&M. c.11), one of the more horrific of the wicked and morally repugnant acts of Westminster was the introduction (in §2) of the “badge” of the poor with the letter “P” to be worn at all times on the shoulder of the right sleeve.
Furthermore, all evidence as to “Jewish Badges” being introduced in Europe as early as the 13th Century is wholly and completely false, as the term “jew” was not revived until the 16th Century. Instead, the first examples of badges as a stigma to status is most likely this act and subsequent acts against the poor by banking and ruling elite who chose to identify themselves as members of the same non-Christian religion invented in the 16th Century that claimed to be victims of the same barbarity.
The use of the “P” as a form of curse and stigma is the same model of modern passports for citizens listed as "P" (Paupers, Poor, Peasant, Prisoners, Property, Peon) used today; and (xii) In 1698 (9&10W3 c.11) an act reinforced the measurement of the poor being one who does not have an annual lease taxable at ten pounds or more, making at the time more than 95% of the population of England, Wales, Ireland and Scotland “poor”; and (xiii) In 1713 (12Ann. S.2 c.18), the extension of Settlement Certificates as a form of negotiable Security was introduced for the first time (and continues with Birth Certificates today) whereby (§2) those born in a place but without a Settlement Certificate (including women and children), could be moved to a different location, such as a commercial workhouse when the “cost” of such certificates were purchased by a corporation; and (xiv) Due to the increase in the number of “poor”, in 1722 a new law was passed (9Geo.1 c.7) in which those who had been thrown out of their homes or had their land seized by pirates and thieves operating with endorsement of Westminster and who sought relief from the Church to stay alive now had to “compete” to enter into a workhouse to survive.
Furthermore, the act expanded the ability for a wide variety of business owners to contract with churchwardens for the rent and use of the poor as “indentured servants” and “apprentices”. (xv) In 1733 (6Geo.2 c.32), one of the most inhumane and barbaric edicts in history was issued by Westminster (and remains an underlying pillar of the slave system today), whereby poor people who could not purchase a “license” to be considered married, would have their children deemed “bastards” and such children could then be seized by Churchwardens and “sold”.
Thus the baby slave trade was born and fully endorsed by the Church of England and British Society; and (xvi) In 1761 (2Geo.3 c.22), Westminster declared that all poor as mental “infants” and too stupid to realize the underlying system of slavery and complicity of the Christian Churches, were now to be cursed and doomed as “dead in law” by their registration in the Bills of Mortality and the creation of the “civil birth” rituals being rituals of death that continue today within modern hospitals and registration of new born babies. This was further reinforced with the act in 1767 (7Geo.3 c.39) that poor children were to be registered and considered “dead in law”; and (xvii) Beginning in 1773 with the Inclosure Act 1773 (13Geo.3 c.81), followed by the Inclosure Consolidation Act 1801 (41Geo.3 c.109),
English Parliament effectively "privatized" massive amounts of common land for the benefit of a few, causing huge numbers of land peasants to become "landless paupers" and therefore in need of parish assistance. In America, this caused massive rebellion as well as in Ireland and Scotland and contributed to forming a Patriot militia leading to the "War of Independence". Almost the entire Patriot milita were deceived, captured and executed in New York (in 1777) under a deal between George Washington of the United Company of Merchants Blue Army and General Cornwalis of the East India Company Red Army.
The Inclosure Acts are the foundation of Land Title as it is known today; and (xviii) Because of the deliberate "legal" theft of land under parliamentary Inclosure laws of the late 18th and early 19th Century, the number of paupers dramatically increased. This led to the most awful and cruel laws being introduced to deliver to an elite few, the slave labor force needed for the industrial revolution through the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) (5&6Will.4 c.76) which effectively stated that the poor could not receive any benefit unless they were constantly "employed" in a workhouse prison. Most importantly, much of the inhuman, barbaric and wholly immoral and sacriligeous framework of dictates and edicts of Westminster remained in force and were not repealed by this act).
Thus, despite international treaties against slavery, the very worst slavery being "wage slavery" or "lawful slavery" was born whereby men, women and children lived in terrible conditions and were continued to be worked "to death"; and (xix) In 1836, the Births and Deaths Registration Act (1836) (6&7Will.4 c.86) was introduced which for the first time created the General Register Office and the requirement for uniform records of births, deaths and marriages across the Empire by Municipal Councils and Unions of Parishes.
Thus on 1, July 1837, the Birth Certificate was formed as the successor of the Settlement Certificate for all "paupers" disenfranchised of their land birthright to be considered lawful ("voluntary") slaves with benefits provided by the local parish / region underwritten by the Society of Lloyds as it is still today; and (xx) Beginning from 1871, further historic changes in the administration of “vital statistics” such as birth certificates and death certificates with the introduction of health districts or “sanitary districts”.
The Local Government Act of 1871 (34&35Vict. c.70), Public Health Act 1872 (35&36Vict. c.79) and in 1874 (37&38Vict. c.89) and the Public Health Act 1875 (38&39Vict. c.55) created a system of “districts” called Sanitary Districts governed by a Sanitary Authority responsible for various public health matters including mental health legally known as “sanity”.
Two types of Sanitary Districts were created being Urban and Rural. While the sanitary districts were “abolished” in 1894 with the Local Government Act of 1894 (57&58Vict. c.73), the administration of the “poor” is still maintained in part under the concept of district health boards of Guardians including magistrates and other “Justices of the Peace”; and (xxi) In 1948, the National Assistance Act (11&12Geo.6 c.29) was introduced and supposed to abolish the Poor Laws. However, many of the most draconian poor law acts were not repealed or abolished as evidenced by the tables of repealed acts that miss key acts, otherwise remaining with full force and effect.
Canon 3352
Since 1990 under the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (WHO) by the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the system of issuing birth certificates as proof of a man or woman being a permanent member of the underclass has become an international system.
Canon 3353
In respect of the adoption of the multiple functions of the use of the information and generic form of a Birth Certificate within present Western Roman Systems: (i) Whilst the same general form and extracted information almost exactly the same as a Birth Certificate may be used (eg a Bond, or other form of Security), unless it is officially “titled” a “Birth Certificate” it is not therefore a “Birth Certificate”; and (ii) There is no evidence that Bonds using the same information derived from the birth register information uses the title “Birth Certificate” (when it is most likely the term Bond is used). Therefore, any presumptions that precisely the same certificate is used for creating bonds is a gross error, when in fact the real question is the use of the information; and (iii) Ignorance in presuming the precise same form of a Birth Certificate is used in all cases of applying the information is a major contributor to permitting “plausible deniability” as to the use or misuse of such information by governments.
Canon 3354
In respect of the adoption of the Admiralty term “Birth” in relation to newborns: (i) The historic record of Statutes of Westminster are a highly unreliable indicator as to the origin of use of the word “Birth” in substitute for historic more ancient and more common terms in the English language such as nascence (from Latin nasci being “born”), or filial, or kin or born. In fact, the majority of European languages with poignant exception to English continue the tradition of using words descended from nasci to indicate the arrival of a new born; and (ii) Westminster statutes indicate the term Birth being used to describe newborns by the early 1700’s.
However, this should be discounted as almost certainly examples of deliberate fraud and corruption. Instead, the most likely introduction of the term Birth, to distinguish from Berth is by early 1800’s such as (6&7Will.4 c.86) following the transfer of control of the registration of all “vessels” to Admiralty in 1795 (35Geo.3 c.58) and reinforced in 1813 (54Geo.3 c.151) and 1823 with (4Geo.4 c.41);
15. We testify that we are not by nature, choice, obligation, or desire citizens of the Federal, Territorial or Municipal United States and that we have never considered such citizenship any benefit and that we officially and upon the records of this country "retired" from any presumption or assumption of such citizenship effective with our respective birth days and Notice of this action was given effective the first of July 1997;
16. We testify that we have pursued all Due Diligence and made all reasonable effort to provide Notice to all responsible parties and Principals, have tried the issues in our Court of Record, and have additionally rendered a Final Judgment and Civil Orders on the eleventh of April 2014 and published it internationally the same day;
17. We testify that we have also published and provided our Affidavit of Probable Cause on the twentieth of June 2015 and published it internationally the same day;
18. We testify that we and our country have been the victims of malicious, organized and purposeful commercial fraud perpetuated by our employees;
19. We testify that we and our country have been the victims of Gross Breach of Trust and breach of international treaties owed to us by the Trustees of Record;
20. We testify that we and our country have additionally suffered genocide, human trafficking, unlawful conversion, usurpation, press-ganging, impersonation, inland piracy, and conspiracy against our lawful government;
21. We testify that according to the Lieber Code, the Hague Conventions, and the AR 27-10 Manuals of the United States Army, the United States Army is responsible for the oversight of all franchised district and court system court operations and that these courts have been allowed to run amok on our shores;
22. We testify that we and our countrymen are owed The Law of Peace as described by Department of the Army Pamphlet 27-161-1 and that we have been systematically misidentified, pillaged, and plundered under false presumptions in these foreign courts and that we have exhausted all administrative remedies;
23. We testify that these and other atrocities have slowly accrued and become institutionalized evils in our midst over the course of 150 years and that these arrangements made "for" us and in our names are hereby overturned, reversed, and remanded for prosecution;
24. We testify that we have timely objected to and corrected the falsified political status records and false claims of obligation offered against our good names and estates and that we have timely recorded claims and indemnification bonds in favor of each of the member States of The United States of America [Unincorporated] and the states and people they serve;
25. We testify that we have recorded international agricultural liens against our trust assets held by the UNITED STATES and all its subsidiaries and franchises including CANADA to recoup our land assets and the land assets of our States of the Union against false claims of abandonment;
26. We testify that we have recorded and given Due Notice and have established Non-UCC liens against all private and public property owed to the people of The United States of America [Unincorporated];
27. We testify that we have re-issued our Sovereign Letters Patent as of November 4, 2015 and have also issued a Declaration of Joint Sovereignty as of November 6, 2015 in concert with the American Native Nations and have also published these throughout the world and provided Due Notice of our action(s);
28. We testify that by virtue of the Norman Conquest and The Settlement of the Norman Conquest we are sovereigns in our own right since 1087 A.D. in England, not subjects of any Queen of England nor of the United Kingdom;
29. We testify that by virtue of our ancestors who came ashore at Boston, Massachusetts in 1609, as free men and sovereigns in their own right, and by right of conquest by our ancestor Colonel William Belcher of the Continental Army and veteran of the Battle of White Plains, New York, among other actions, we are right-wise victorious inheritors and progeny owed all guarantees, oaths, bonds, treaties, covenants, and trusts of our States and Nations;
30. We testify that by virtue of our ancestors who objected to the 1860 election of Abraham Lincoln, a Bar Attorney prohibited from holding public office in our government, and also by virtue of our ancestors who upheld the Federation of States, we are "grandfathered in" to the guarantees, treaties, and trusts that are owed to us and we have provided our genealogy in evidence;
31. We testify that we have overcome all false claims that we and our country are dead, bankrupt, peons, poor, animals, paupers, or otherwise afflicted, wards of the state, voluntary decedents, mental incompetents or in any other manner rendered incompetent by any excuse made to presume against us;
32. We testify that by guile and fraud a vicious and long outlawed foreign system of enfranchisement and enslavement was secretively installed upon our shores and that as a result fraudulent insurances, bottomry bonds, and annuities in the form of $950 Trillion worth of "Life Force Value Annuities" naturally belonging to us, and to other innocent people, were claimed by then-Prince Philip, Consort of Queen Elizabeth II, and received by him under false pretenses on or about April 15, 2017 in blatant fraud against us and against our lawful government, which the Queen is under obligation to protect on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways;
33. We testify that these grotesque impositions upon our good nature and trust are exacerbated by the use and pollution caused by Dog Latin displayed upon the records of all these foreign statutory courts and Court Systems improperly addressing our people and demeaning them so as to deliberately and secretively reduce the living men and women of this continent and every other to the level of corporate franchises subject to statutory regulation, impoundment, enslavement and liquidation;
34. We testify that in Gross Breach of Trust owed to us, our United States Patent and Trademark Office and our United States Copyright Office have been operated in a criminal and highly negligent fashion so as to promote similar gross errors and fraud and legal chicanery against virtually every other country in the world, and that this has allowed and promoted a practice of fraudulent imposition of taxes, mortgages, land titles, and other claims against our assets and the assets of other people and countries which were in fact never owed;
35. We testify that in similar Gross Breach of Trust owed to us, and in Gross Abuse of our Delegated Powers,  our United States Army, Air Force, Navy, Marines, and Coast Guard have been misdirected and misused and abused and have been deployed in endless commercial mercenary actions mis-identified as "wars" via the use of deliberate deceitful euphemisms, for example, "The War on Drugs"---and have in fact been made party to many illegal and profoundly evil actions without their knowledge, and have in all cases been denied pay and benefits commensurate with the vile duties in which they have been unknowingly employed;
36. We testify that stock portfolios owed to veterans of World War II were never fully disclosed and never made freely available to them or to their families and that undisclosed commercial agents made false claims of abandonment on these assets;
37. We testify that our good names and estates have been deliberately misidentified and commandeered, that our good names and estates have been purloined and abused without any just compensation by persons under contract to provide our States with essential government services, that our assets have been placed into generation skipping trusts without our knowledge or consent, then subsumed into foreign bankruptcies and seized upon as chattel for the debts of secondary and merely presumed beneficiaries;
38. We testify that this criminal system has been promoted and allowed to infest the entire world via abusive, negligent, and profound Breach of Trust against us, against our States, against our People, and against many other countries which have been under the false impression that these British-controlled operatives of the Territorial United States and Municipal United States were acting upon our behest and under our control;
39. We testify that these foreign entities have been a scourge on our shores, usurping against our lawful government, our States, and our People for 150 years, that we have received back our Delegated Powers by Operation of Law, and we have acknowledged and accepted their return and provided for the assembling of the actual state jural assemblies to conduct business which is long overdue;
40. We testify that this action of ours to reconstruct and restore our lawful government is not any act of aggression nor any threat to the American States or People;
41. We testify that this is not an insurrection, a rebellion, a tin-hat conspiracy, nor any sort of questionable or unlawful action or trespass against anyone: this is a Crime Report issued to military authorities and Notice that we are finishing the reconstruction of the Federal United States coupled with Notice of Liability to all and anyone who continues to obstruct, misidentify, mischaracterize, entrap, dis-serve, misinform, or otherwise seeks to impair the functioning of the remaining lawful government of this country;
42. We testify that the bulk of the damage done to us and to our country and to our countrymen has been accomplished by members of the Bar Associations, who by definition are in receipt of foreign titles of nobility owing allegiance to the same British Monarchs who have acted in Gross Breach of Trust against us;
43. We testify that these same Bar Association members have been instrumental in corrupting and disengaging and undermining the operations of our courts, substituting foreign and oppressive statutory law as an instrument of theft via falsification of public records and attendant false legal presumptions, and promoting the various usurpations against our lawful government that have resulted in the present circumstance;
44. We testify that we have established lawful liens against the American Bar Association and International Bar Association in the amount of $279 Trillion dollars as recompense for the damage done here and to assure that these professional crime syndicates are disbanded and removed from our shores;
45. We testify that a great many people in all walks of life including the military and the legal and medical professions have been unaware of the fact that they have been acting in insurrection against the lawful government and committing crimes against their employers and have in fact committed treason against their own country;
46. We testify that our object in undertaking this Crime Report and issuing these Notices is to promote a wider understanding of the circumstance we all find ourselves in and promotion of cooperation and understanding to correct this whole situation;
47. We testify that members of the Bar Associations are generally in denial and seeking to discredit us and our testimony for obvious reasons, but that other professionals, including Supreme Court Justice Harlan and Melvin Stamper, have sounded the alarm bells;
48. We testify that the public records of fifteen decades of usurpation, together with the records of the bankruptcies and payments engendered from falsification of our political status, are more than sufficient to prove motive, opportunity, and means to commit the enslavement of babies and surreptitious seizure of their life-estates as recounted in the historical outline above;
49. We testify that these crimes are repugnant and abhorrent to common decency, crimes of cowardice and identity theft committed against the youngest and most helpless members of our communities--- babies and young mothers recovering from childbirth;
50. We testify upon the sacred soil of our states of the Union that these words are true and this testimony is correct and complete to the best of our knowledge and belief, issued from without the United States, in full life, in good faith, under the penalties of perjury owed to The United States of America [Unincorporated].
So said, so done and so sealed by our hands this 14th day of June 2017:
by: James Clinton Belcher, Head of State
by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

Thursday, June 14, 2018

Treaty of 1213 - The Beginning of the Lie

Once upon a time before the year 1066 the people of England held Allodial title to their land. Not even the king could take the land for not paying a tithe. William the Conquer came in 1066 and stole the Kings Title and took the land of the people. From William I, 1066, to King John, 1199, England was in dire straits. It was bankrupt.

The King invoked the Law of Mortmain, the dead man's hand, so people couldn't pass their land on to the church or anyone else without the King's permission, (modern day probate?). Without Mortmain the King would lose the land he controlled. The Vatican didn't like that because the King owed a lot of pounds to the Vatican.(WHY?)(1). King John refused to accept The Vatican's representative, Stephen Langton, whom Pope Innocent III installed to rule England(religious or in fact?)(2) In 1208 England was placed under Papal interdict(?). Interdict means a prohibition.)

King John was excommunicated and in trying to regain his stature he groveled before the Pope and returned the title to his kingdoms of England and Ireland to the Pope as vassals, and swore submission and loyalty to him. King John accepted Langton as Archbishop of Canterbury, and offered the Pope a vassal's bond of fealty and homage. Two months later, in July of 1213, King John was absolved of excommunication, at Winchester, by the returned Archbishop of Canterbury, Langton. On October 3, 1213, by treaty, King John ratified his surrender of his kingdoms to the Pope, as Vicar of Christ who claimed ownership of everything and everyone on earth as tradition.
Question 1. Where in the Bible did Jesus give any man this kind of power over all men and land? He didn't. He did not create a religion nor did he create the office of Pope.
Question 2. Can you have a third party break a contract between you and another person under duress..? Don't those of you who are forced into a contract reserve all your rights under modern UCC 1-207 and claim UCC 1-103?
The contract (treaty of 1213) was between two parties. Now the Barons of England would not put up with being slaves anymore so they took to the sword and made King John sign the Magna Charta. So doesn't this act of the Barons violate the principle of natural law, when they created the Magna Charta, as having no force and effect upon a contract between two parties? Well Pope Innocent III, the other contracting party thought so, for he declared the Magna Charta to be: ". . .unlawful and unjust as it is base and shameful. . . whereby the Apostolic See is brought into contempt, the Royal Prerogative diminished, the English outraged, and the whole enterprise of the Crusade greatly imperiled." Quoted from G.R.C. Davis: Magna Charta. Trustee of the British Museum. London. 1965.
The Pope, in order to introduce strife in England and Ireland that would help him, used Jesus teachings to his advantage that is verified in the Gospels by two of His Apostles. So St. Levy (Mark 2:14; Luke 5:27), alias Matthew, cites Jesus at Matthew 10::34-36 and Luke 12:49, 51-3. Nothing reveals the antithesis of government and religion more clearly than these facts.
Question 3. What did the contract of 1213 A.D. create? A TRUST or CONTRACT. Only the two parties, the King's heirs and the Pope, can break the contract. For the Trust /Contract cannot be broken as long as there are heirs to both sides of the contract.
At this time in history we now know who controlled the Kings of England and the land of the world. For Now we have the Pope claiming the whole Western Hemisphere besides Europe. The Holy See of Antioch ruled all the easterly side and the Holy See of Alexandria ruled the western side, so there was a conflict. (3)

So, on with the story. The King's explorers had come to America to claim dominion over land by deceiving and murdering the natives, the American Indians. The King operated under the treaty of 1213 and everything was going along okay until the 1770's when the bunch of rogues called the "Founding Fathers" decided they wanted the benefits but not pay the taxes to the King. They, being lawyers, and professional educated men, didn't know they were still under the Pope's control? Their lies and fraud now would affect the American colonies and the people who lived on the land.

Those common people who fought in the American Revolution were unaware that the 1213 treaty still ruled despite the fact they THOUGHT the Magna Charta was a viable piece of work.(4) The Declaration of Rights in 1689 declared the Rights of the British subjects in England. At the end of the English Declaration it stated at Section III " ...that should any of the Rights just mentioned be in violation of the HOLY ALLIANCE (1213 Treaty), ...it is as if this Declaration was never written".

So we know that the English Declaration didn't fly, so what makes you think the 1774 Declaration of Rights in this British Colony would work. Weren't these people doing the same thing as the Barons did in 1215 A.D. to King John? A contract is a contract. Look at Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution. Can anyone obligate a contract? Were the "founding fathers" trying to obligate a contract between two parties that still have heirs living today?
Question 4. How important is the "ultimate benefactor", the Pope, The HOLY SEE, in the scheme of things? Move through history till modern times and pull Public Law 88-244, which follows Public Law 88-243 - the institution of the law- merchants Uniform Commercial Code. Are you shocked that the Pope is listed in this Public Law?

Doesn't the United States have an ambassador in the Vatican? Why? Is it a government like all other nations such as France, Japan, Spain or Brazil? The Vatican runs the world, it controls the British Crown. Is it any wonder they separate man's Church and government? They don't talk about the Lord Almighty's Church (government) do they.(5) "Organized churches" are given special tax privileges because the Vatican dictates to the sixty United States trustees through the trust document, the U.S. Constitution created by the 1783 treaty between the King, frontman for the Vatican, and Adams, Hartly, Laurens, & Franklin who were operating for the King and not the people of America. Look at Article VI of the Constitution for the United States for your answer as stated in the "New History of America".(6)

You see we are still under the Pope who rules over all nations as he declared he did back in 1213. The 1783 Treaty did say in the opening statement quoted exactly as it appears in olde English; "It having pleafed the Divine Providence to difpofe the hearts of the Moft Serene and Moft Porent Prince, George the Third, by the grace of God, King of the Great Britain, France and Ireland, Defender, of the Faith , Duke of Brunfwick and Laurenberg, Arch-Treafurer and PRINCE ELECTOR OF THE HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE, & C. AND OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, . . .."
(Emphasis added in caps).

Did you catch the last few words? This is from a King (man) who can supposedly make no claim over the United States of America because he was defeated? The King claims God gave him the almighty power to say that no man can ever own property because it, "goes against the tenets of his church, the Vatican/Holy Roman Empire, because the King is the "Elector of the Holy Roman Empire’"

What about the secret Treaty of Verona, made the 22nd of November, 1822, which shows the power of the Pope and the Vatican's interest in the US Republic.

Here is part of The Secret Treaty of Verona. "The undersigned specially authorized to make some additions to the treaty of the Holy Alliance, after having exchanged their respective credentials, have agreed as follows:
ARTICLE I. The high contracting powers being convinced that the system of representative government is equally as incompatible with the monarchial principles as the maxim of the sovereignty of the people with the divine right, engage mutually, in the most solemn manner to use all their efforts to put an end to the system of representative governments, in what ever country it may exist in Europe, and to prevent its being introduced in those countries where it is not yet known.
ARTICLE 2. As it cannot be doubted that the liberty of the press is the most powerful means used by the pretended supporters of the rights of nations to the detriment of those of princes, the high contracting parties promise reciprocally to adopt all proper measures to suppress it, not only in their own state but also in the rest of Europe.
ARTICLE 3. Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to keep nations in the state of passive obedience which they owe to their princes, the high contracting parties declare it to be their intention to sustain in their respective states, those measures which the clergy may adopt with the aim of ameliorating their own interests, so intimately connected with the preservation of the authority of the princes; and the contracting powers join in offering their thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for them, and solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the nations."

Do we have a false God before us and worship him and his church instead of the real Lord, Jesus and his government. The divine right of kings exists in Clinton and every Governor of the states in corporate Union. Well let me go on record and say that the Lord gave me the same right as the Pope claims was given to him. Am I not a Steward upon the land of the Lord as a mere sojourner, the same as the Pope? Are not you also a Steward?

Did the Lord make a covenant with Adam and Eve to subdue the earth and reign over the animals and to populate the earth? Doesn't that contract still exist? And doesn't it exist with you also? And we, the true believers in that contract, can we take all the nations (mans) laws in the world and dump them in the ocean to regain our rightful place on this earth under the Lord's Natural Law to thwart the contract between King John and the Pope that appears to defeat the original contract the Lord made with man?

Yes, let us go back to the original contract and destroy the Vatican's control over everybody. Before 1066 the Pope did not claim all the land as the people claimed the land and didn't pay taxes on it to anybody. Didn't the Lord say to the people after coming out of Egypt, "why do you want a king when you have me and my contract?" Which Lord do you want to live under, a Pope, a King, President, Governors, Senators, Representatives, or a real Lord called Jesus Christ. "Christians," are ridiculed and put down because they read the Word of the Lord correctly and could defeat even the best the Pope has to throw at them.

The King James version of the Bible is just that. A version concocted by the King under the guidance of the Pope so as to hide the real truth. I was taught by the church I went to, which is government controlled as it has to be by the treaty of 1213 and reiterated in the 1783 Treaty between The Pope's Elector, King John and the First President of the United States, Sam Huntington and Charles Thompson, Secretary. I read the passage, when Jesus was on the cross, from a very old manuscript that said, "Forgive them NOT, for they know what they do." This is different than what most people believe he said, "Forgive them for they know not what they do." Bottom line is that when men write, transcribe, translate, update, and copy over thousands of years they always alter the interpretation, words and insert their own meanings. You can see this in just the 200 years that our country became separated from England, but still remains a colony under different compact and use of clever wording. But that is another whole subject that you do not know about.

Eminent domain and Allodial title:
Why and where did "eminent domain" rear its ugly head? Right after the King's government was formed here in America. Eminent domain replaced the Law of Mortmain of England and when government wanted your land they claimed eminent domain thereby destroying that to what people think they have allodial title. Allodial title only existed in America when the King granted the use of the land to the likes of William Penn, .........

But it could be taken at any time. Are you or were your great, great, great grandfathers ever free to hold land that could never be taken away? Ask some of today's farmers and see how many lost their farms to the government that belonged to their past family and I'll bet none of the land goes back to the 1789 era. Well it's a wonderful world to live in the end times, isn't it. Read Revelations to see where the false preachers come from. Who is the "Harlot" in Revelations?

Does the Vatican come close with a mortal calling himself the "vicar" of Christ?

Here is the definition of vicar in Webster's 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language.
Vicar: "In a general sense, a person deputed or authorized to perform the functions of another; a substitute in office."

The Pope PRETENDS to be vicar of Jesus Christ on earth.

Pretend; To hold out as a false appearance; to offer something feigned instead of that which is real; To exhibit as a cover for something hidden."

You bet your life the Pope has something to hide. He is no more powerful than You. The King is no more powerful than You. The American President and Governor's are no more powerful than You. You allow THEM run your lives ...WHY.?

Thinkers, you cannot fight the Pope or the King on their contract even though you are affected by the contract. You must go elsewhere for relief. Remember the first contract in history, God with Adam and Eve? You had better because you were a part of it as an heir and it is your saving grace. Why do you think the "courts of common law" are despised and Government and States are taking action to stop them? See where the power lies when this happens? Clinton, the Governors, and Congress of the United States and the Legislatures of the several states are only following orders and delegate to the 60 U.S. Trustees, who always show up in bankruptcy generated mostly by IRS actions. Isn't that a starting point?

What do Trustees administer? A trust? The Constitution is a trust, correct? It was created by the 1783 Treaty, correct? It is not the private man's trust contract, correct? Only those entering into the contract are UNDER the constitution and are bound by it, correct? Look up the definition of "under" in words and phrases and a good dictionary such as Webster's 1828 at Vol. II, 101. I, my dear readers, am not "under" some damn corporate trust (constitution) drafted in secrecy by the King and corporate lawyer esquires (you call them the "Founding Fathers") whom were controlled by the Treaty of 1213, wherein the Vatican still ruled over all. It was never "my constitution" and never will be. The Constitution does not apply to me nor will it ever.

However, some of the states' representatives in 1776 realized that the Constitution was a commercial contract among the Founding Fathers to protect their financial interests in the Americas and in Europe. The Articles of the Bill of Rights is designed to keep those United States citizens whom are bound by the Constitution (contract) from encroaching upon my natural Law Rights, (With this hint in mind you may discover where the IRS gets its purported power that makes you liable, because you claim to be UNDER the constitution, but they will never admit it because only a few know the real reason and they are not about to tell their agents. The same goes for any license issued to you by the corporate States). I hope you have read the Supreme Court cases of State and United States cited in my previous books that prove beyond any shadow of a doubt I am correct in my previous two sentences. Yet you always fall back into the trap by claiming citizenship of the United States AND THE STATES.

No! You are not a citizen of the corporate or organic State if you want to be free. You cannot claim it is your constitution and remain free. You cannot claim representatives in the legislatures and remain free. How about your estate? State and Estate come from the same contract.

Webster's 1828 Dictionary defines it;

"ESTA'TE, n. 1. In a general sense, fixedness; a condition; now generally written and pronounced state. (6) The general interest of business or government; hence a political body; a commonwealth; a republic.

But in this sense, we now use State." Get the picture? We are the ryots tenure holding the "estate" of the King called your estate. Belong to a body politic and you are a slave. In my previous books I told the people a "republic" is a fraud, for then you belong to the estate of the King which makes you a law-merchant holding as a trustee the King's land that he is holding in trust for the Vatican. The States are the "estate " of the Vatican/King cabal with the money changers along for the ride are a full blown consortium which includes the Congress/President/ Governors et al. I don't want to drive you crazy, since you might not comprehend all that is here. Once you know the truth and let go of all you were taught by the government and the preachers you don't become the drowning man grasping at the lies to stay afloat. Have you ever wondered why you were sinking while pleading case law and their constitution to protect you?

Bye till next time,
The Informer

(1)(WHY?). Because the Pope claimed all lands as the vicar of Christ and the king owed money from the Vatican that was to be collected by the Church of England. The church reduced their parishioners to mere serfdom. When they died the church got the property and the King, in order to preserve what property he had instituted the law of Mortmain. This prevented the people from willing the land to the Pope. When the pope got wind of this he excommunicated the King. That's the explanation for the Why?

(2) This is a fact that is documented in the English documents of History at the Leeds Library.

(3)The conflict between each of the Holy Sees, one controlling the western front (America) and the other controlling the China side with the dividing line somewhere in Spain and France through Germany. The Pope is the figurehead, remember and the best way to explain it is Congress is Alexandria and the Senate is Antioch.

(4) (Why doesn't the Magna Charta hold more force and effect than a later contract between the king and the Pope? Because the Pope decreed it null and void as it would break the contract he had initiated with the King. The Magna Charta was a contract breaker by third parties and that was a no-no in any law. Besides the Pope owned England and how could the Barons take the land that the King pledged let alone all the surfs that the Pope still controlled through the church of England? He can't and so the Magna Charta was declared Void. Now the Pope, through the front man, The King, could create the other contracts called treaties and no one is the wiser. Remember, the Pope was being controlled by the creditor, The Rothschilds to whom the Pope was indebted.

(5) Why? It is clear as a bell. The "church" of GOD is 'Government of GOD and man created all these religions and made churches for them. They, man, cannot allow the Government of the Lord "Church upon this rock" to get in the way of the government of men, now can they?

(6) "New History of America", by The Informer

People you can read this for yourself in American Council of Christian Laymen: "How Red Is The Federal Council of Churches", Madison, Wisconsin, 1949. Now you may better understand James Montgomery's latest as to why all the declarations, Magna Charta, etc. have no effect. Read on to see why.

See: James Montgomery's - "British Colony III" on the Internet. To further prove what I say that the declared rights were also at the mercy of any previous charters or grants from the king of England you must read section 25 of the 1776 North Carolina Constitution, Declaration of Rights which states;09"And provided further, that nothing herein contained shall affect the titles or possessions of individuals holding or claiming under the laws heretofore in force, or grants heretofore made by the late King George II, or his predecessors, or the late lords proprietors, or any of them."


https://forums.national-assembly.net/viewtopic.php?f=264&t=11

Monday, April 2, 2018

To President Trump and UN Inspector General on Easter Sunday 2018


By Anna Von Reitz

 April 1, 2018

President Donald J. Trump
c/o Office of the Chief of Protocol
2201 C Street NW, Room 1238
Washington, DC 20520

Office of the United Nations Inspector General
Attention: UNIG
CP 2500 1211 Geneva

Dear Sirs, 

My wife and I both come from the ancient race of the Coriosolites of Amorica, our homeland is in Northwestern France and our presence there was recorded by Julius Caesar prior to the Roman Conquest of England. Many artifacts and coins and records of our people still survive.  Our ancestors, the Kings--both Bors and Ban of Gaul and Benoic (Benwick)-- held large portions of both France and England for many generations--- it it because of these facts that William the Conqueror had a valid claim which Edward the Confessor recognized. 

That is the hidden history of the claim of William the Conqueror---hidden only because the British Government has hidden it in hopes of profiting themselves by chicanery and unjust enrichment then as now.  

We have been free sovereigns in our own right in England since 1087 A.D.   Our kinsmen wrote and enforced the Magna Carta a little more than a hundred years later.  

In 1609 we came to America and by 1630 our direct progenitors were here, building Boston.  It takes no great understanding of the world to grasp the fact that "America" is not a namesake of Amerigo Vespucci.  It is the namesake of our ancient homeland, Amorica.  

Nor does it take any sophistication to see the blazon of the Belle Chers  (anglicized to Belcher) firmly established as The Great Seal of The United States of America and The Great Seal of The United States.  

Take a look at those seals and comprehend what they mean.  The Great Seal of The United States of America is open.  No border.  No limit.  Not a dependent sovereignty.  The Great Seal of the United States is closed.  Always encircled. Dependent on delegated power.  

Nor does it require any great grasp of history to recognize that the British Empire has been the source of all the lies and misery that has infested the world for many generations.  The present despots of the world think we have forgotten and that they are free to make whatever ridiculous lies and claims they please, but we are here and we know who we are and we do remember. 

I am Hereditary Head of State of The United States of America (Unincorporated) standing on the land and soil of this country in full sovereign capacity.  I am not now and have not acted in any foreign Territorial or Municipal capacity since I left the USAF in 1964 and gave full Notice of the same in 1998.  Again.  I have deliberately seized upon my own lawful Trade Name which was unconscionably presumed to be a derelict and abandoned "vessel" and have returned it to the land and soil of my native country.  From there, I have seized back all derivative ACCOUNTS and re-flagged the VESSELS.  

There can be no doubt who I am and in what capacity I am acting. 

Let the record show that The United States of America (Unincorporated) was formed on September 9, 1776 and has never ceased functioning, never been at war since the signing of the Treaty of Peace in Paris, 1783, and has never been bankrupt, in abeyance, or otherwise entangled in the commercial feudalism of the United Kingdom by any official act of ours or our States.  

The Territorial United States Government which has been organized as a commercial corporation in the business of providing governmental services since 1868 has grossly and unconscionably abused our delegated powers and worked a thoroughly reprehensible fraud scheme on our shores in contravention of both the Geneva and Hague Conventions. This foreign corporation has outrageously usurped upon us and our lawful government and other lawful governments around the world. 

Unfortunately, as they have been (mis)representing us to the United Nations and have unjust enrichment as a motive for doing so, they have basically fed upon their loyal employers and attempted to displace them in Gross Breach of Trust via means of fraud and deceit and secretive substitution of their Territorial offices for our National offices. 

The British Government and the British Crown is most accountable for this, along with the former Pontifical Office of the Holy See.  These great wrongs have been fully admitted and then tossed into the air without responsibility being taken for the return of the property and assets and private belongings of the people worldwide. 

Instead of an orderly and just settlement, too many parties have been trying to maintain The Lie and continue the abuse, most notably certain members of the British Parliament, the US Territorial Congress, the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, INC., and various mercenary agencies including the US District and Territorial Court Systems. 

Mr. Trump is not responsible for nor guilty of any of this deplorable criminality; rather, he has inherited it from a long line of  predecessors.  We have the utmost sympathy for the position this places him in and support his efforts to clean up this Mess; however, we also realize that he has come into this office as a complete neophyte and that he is being lied to by experts who are anxious to cover their own tracks. So we are observing these matters for those with eyes to see. 

The continued fraud and attempted identify theft of entire countries by these commercial "service" corporations has even extended down to the level of individual people who have had their persons deliberately mis-characterized as "citizens" of the Territorial and Municipal United States and even as corporate franchises of their commercial "fleet".   

With the entry of the parent corporations of both the Territorial and Municipal United States into different levels of bankruptcy, it has been necessary for us to re-assert our dominion, recall our delegated powers, establish contracts with other federal service providers, serve Notice on all the Principals and Principle Parties (which we have done), report these crimes to the appropriate international authorities and bring forward our claims to assert our trust interests and recoup our assets, which the so-called service providers were holding-- and profiting from -- without our knowledge or consent. 

The essence of the fraud lies in semantic deceits and mistaken identities and resulting falsification of public records. We have many, many millions of innocent Americans who have been defrauded and purposefully entrapped and misidentified as Territorial United States and Municipal United States citizens. 

We do not propose that the current situation of confusion and dereliction of duty persist at the hands of internationally appointed bankruptcy trustees chosen by Secondary Creditors of our Hired Help.  

Their bankruptcy does not imply our bankruptcy, nor the bankruptcy of our States nor our people.  It does not provide any excuse for seizing upon our assets or mis-addressing us in any presumed foreign capacity whatsoever.

This is your Due Notice of these facts.  

All Americans coming forward to reclaim their Good Names and Estates must be recognized as innocent Third Parties and as internationally Protected Persons. 

This is your Due Notice that there is no such thing as a "sovereign citizen" nor is there any such thing as a "private citizen".  It is impossible to be a sovereign and a citizen at the same time.  It also impossible to be acting in a private capacity and a public capacity at the same time.  We do not understand why the members of the Territorial Bar Associations and the Press Corps and the so-called "US Bankruptcy" Courts are still being ALLOWED to apply these oxymorons and label people "sovereign citizens" or dare to address their employers in this manner.  

We object strongly to any presumption of the existence of any such frivolous and imaginary political status and we require the assistance of all international courts to stop this fraud upon the courts worldwide.

We call upon the United Nations Inspector General to clamp down on all UN Employees to be sure that none of them are mindlessly perpetuating these abuses and that you are enforcing proper recognition of American Vessels active in both International Trade and Commerce as operating in their private capacity, and upon President Trump to similarly put an end to these abuses.  

I have been informed of several cases this week where law enforcement officers and petty officers in federated state and county courts have seized upon Americans and leveled these ridiculous "charges" of them being "sovereign citizens" and also attempting to pretend that these people who were going about their business and not bothering anyone were "obstructing" their operations. 

Let us be perfectly blunt.  These Territorial minions have no permission to be here addressing American people on their own shores and any commercial liability they create, they are accountable for.  Any violence they perpetuate, they are accountable for.  They have no right of presumption against their employers-- we, sirs, are their ultimate employers.  

We are thoroughly sick of this "bully boy" attitude and abuse of the law, both international and commercial.  This country functions under the American Common Law, not British Equity Law, not Territorial Statutory Law, and not under Municipal Code.  Until the American Bar Association gets that drilled through their heads and forced to recognize the American people as lawful persons who are naturally outside the jurisdiction of their courts,  there will continue to be despicable ignorance and abuse.

I believe that Mr. Trump is still holding the Office of Commander in Chief and it is his responsibility to inform these courts and the responsibility of the US Army to enforce discipline upon them and to properly administer the Law of Peace, FM 27-161-1, and that all Americans must be presumed to be the victims of this vast institutionalized fraud. 

If there is any doubt in your mind that we have indeed corrected our standing which was impaired by deliberate fraud and falsification of the public records, I suggest that you look in the public records to see exactly where, when, and how we have removed ourselves and our "Vessels" from both Municipal and Territorial jurisdiction and have established our permanent domicile on our land and soil and have furthermore brought these issues before the various international bodies and courts.  

Our standing in this matter is iron-clad and all your members and all their courts have been given Notice and have date-stamped and filed and returned closure on these exemptions and these claims.  Any idea that we are ignorant little bumpkins to be rolled by the press gangs and abused by commercial mercenaries need to end right here and right now.  The Sleeping Giant has awakened and is exercising its  reversionary trust interest.  The "presumed" donors have returned from "over the sea" and there are now thousands of us awake and taking action, including eligible fiduciaries for all fifty states ---- people who have demonstrated their genealogy in this country prior to the so-called Civil War, which was not a war, but a cat-fight among our governmental service providers and wannabe providers. 

Our National Trust Interest includes the estates of all Americans who are not "voluntarily" and "knowingly" subjecting themselves under full disclosure to the Queen and the Crown, despite whatever False Witness their deliberately concocted and whatever misinformation deceitful public records may bear, and none of the people coming forward to reclaim their Good Names and Estates may be hampered, arrested, accused of any disloyalty or wrong-doing, misaddressed, mischaracterized, or abused in any way, shape, or form by any incorporated entity dry-docked on our shores.  It also includes all State land trusts and assets. 

Our States are being summoned into session to address long-overdue business and to put an end to any speculation that our country or its National Government is now or has ever been "in abeyance".  The state land trusts, both public and private, belong to The United States of America (Unincorporated) and their administration must now be returned to us without further chicanery or obfuscation. 

Our sovereignty and our exercise of our sovereignty is not dependent on public opinion or on any time clock set in Rome, London, or anywhere else.  It's our sovereignty and we are now choosing to exercise it. 

We wish the return of all our land patents, titles, and interests, all our property real and imaginary, our Good Names and ESTATES, businesses, currency, notes, gold that was confiscated under conditions of deceit, all intellectual and natural property owed to America and to Americans must be exempted from any claims of "citizenship" or bankruptcy and returned to us and our sovereign safe-keeping, free and clear, without encumbrance of any kind. 

All mercenary agencies and "courts" operating on our shores need to be converted to lawful service or deported.  

We have secured the exact records of how this gigantic fraud was accomplished via diligent search of the US Patent and Trademark Office and US Copyright Office.  We have the proof on the public record, written in their own words, signed by their own hands.  There is no point in arguing it or trying to destroy the evidence, which will simply make it all look even worse. 

It is now the responsibility of the United Nations Inspector General to object to these abuses by the bankruptcy trustees and insist upon their removal and the reinstatement of bankruptcy trustees chosen by the actual Priority Creditors and Holders in Due Course: The United States of America (Unincorporated), their member-states known as Florida, Georgia, Maine, Vermont, et alia., and their people.  

It is the responsibility of the UN Inspector General and Mr. Trump, both, to diligently object to the practice of seizing upon American children and their dishonest and deliberate misidentification and mis-characterization as Territorial Wards or Municipal Franchises. 

We object to the process of "registering" people as if they were things and placing war flags on their PERSONS as an excuse to prosecute them in foreign jurisdictions and under false presumptions----crimes known as personage and barratry resulting in genocide on paper, and still being practiced and allowed by the UN Bankruptcy Trustees, the Territorial United States Courts and their federated State of State Franchise "Court Systems" and their subsidiary federated County Courts. 

This is not the service we are owed and which we have paid for and we most strenuously object to any continuance of these false presumptions being held against our lawful government, our states, and our people.  

                                                                        Sincerely, 

                                                                         James Clinton Belcher
----------------------------
See this article and over 800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

Thursday, February 22, 2018

Continuity of Evidence and The Time Line You All Need to Know:


By Anna Von Reitz

In 1998, James and I gave Notice to the Pope that our states and people were never bankrupt and that this entire scam and Breach of Trust against our country was objected to in the strongest terms possible.
In 2008, we and about 900 other Americans served final Due Process concerning the Great Fraud to Pope Benedict XVI. We provided clear and convincing material evidence of the fraud, of the Due Process given to the Church and the British Monarch, and the harm done to our states and people and to the whole world.
On June 12th, 2011, the Romanus Pontifex was officially collapsed and terminated, via Ritus Mandamus and Ritus Probatum (Public Register Number 983210-331235-01004).
As a result, all claims to own the land and land assets were released by the Crown and the door opened for remedy and reclamation and restoration of the usurped national governments and the people's private property rights.
We can no longer be considered paupers or wards of the state or bankrupts and may freely correct all falsified public records and reclaim our assets out of the gigantic slush pile-- both as states and as people.
Accordingly, we placed UCC Notices and Private Notices both before and after the collapse of the Romanus Pontifex reclaiming the land assets being held "in trust" by the Municipal and Territorial Government corporations for the actual states and people.
Remember that you and everything associated with you including your names and trademarks and accounts are all land assets. We aren't just talking about physical soil descriptions or ownership-- we are talking about the literal ownership of your body and name and everything you think you own being reclaimed and returned to you and your lawful states.
This was the beginning of a long, long process of claims and verification and recordings and registrations, and central to the validity of the claims and the standing to bring the claims is what lawyers call "the continuity of the evidence".
The Belle Chers have been sovereigns in their own right in France since 480 A.D. and in England since 1087 A.D. and in America since 1777 A.D. That is what is meant by "continuity of the evidence"-- a claim by right established by inheritance or conquest or election maintained over time in continuity. In this case- continuity in office as sovereigns in their own right.
The claim of a sovereign person made in behalf of a sovereign people having continuity of office pre-dating all of the nonsense of the American Civil War and a sovereignty pre-dating the establishment of the Unum Sanctum Trust by 800 years, trumps all claims that can be made by any politician, lawyer, cleric, or other individual at all, including the Queen of England, who is in fact only a co-sovereign on English soil.
To put it bluntly, when push came to shove and every other system meant to protect you all was either failing to respond or was actively seeking to enslave and harm you, the Hereditary Head of State took action to bust the fraud and reclaim all the assets of the sovereign nation-states for the nation-states and also established Equal Protection Claims for each and every one of you.
For that, you can be very glad, but it does not mean that you can just sit on your rumps and wiggle your legs like babies waiting to be fed. You all need to correct the falsified public records and reclaim your names and trademarks and other assets--- and be aware that until you do, there will still be sharks in the water trying to rip you off.
The most typical form of this fraud will be offers to give you a bribe in exchange for unwittingly donating your Good Name and Estate to the perpetrators--- and restart the same old Babylonian slave system again. It won't be presented as a bribe, but that is what it is, and it is a bribe using stolen property, your stolen property along with property belonging to many others, alive and dead.
Keep your Shinola Sensors set on "High Alert" until this Mess gets straightened out.

 ----------------------------
See this article and over 800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

Sunday, February 18, 2018

Blow by Blow from The Informer


From Anna Von Reitz

I first read this extensive expose in about..... I am going to say, 1995?  --- and I believe that it came from our friend, The Informer, one of the great researchers and Grand Old Men of the entire patriot movement.   

Time goes on and we can now add more pieces to the puzzle. For example, we now know the THING in Washington, DC is: (1) foreign with respect to us; (2) functions in territorial and municipal international jurisdictions foreign to us; (3) functions as commercial corporations in the business of providing government services; and (4) it has been this way since the beginning. 
This information and its implications is not evident in the following blow-by-blow expose of how we got into this Mess, but you will not find a better or more documented single source of specific information about the history from 1933 forward through the federation of the States of States and all that that entails.  
Happy chewing, campers!  And thank you, Informer, forever!   It's because of you and people like Bill Benson that we still have a country to call home!  
______________________________________________________________
Enclosed is Senate Report No. 93-549, 93rd Congress, 1st Session (1973), “Summary Of Emergency Power Statutes”, consisting of 607 pages, which you will find most interesting. The United States went “Bankrupt” in 1933 and was declared so by President Roosevelt by Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111 and by Executive Order 6260 on March 9, 1933 (See: Senate Report 93-549, pgs. 187 & 594), under the “Trading with The Enemy Act” (Sixty-Fifth Congress, Sess. I, Chs. 105, 106, October 5, 1917), and as codified at 12 U.S.C.A. 95a. On May 23, 1933, Congressman, Louis T. McFadden, brought formal charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank System, the Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of the United States Treasury for criminal acts. The petition for Articles of Impeachment was thereafter referred to the Judiciary Committee, and has yet to be acted upon (See: Congressional Record, pp. 4055-4058). Congress confirmed the Bankruptcy on June 5, 1933, and impaired the obligations and considerations of contracts through the “Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard And Abrogate The Gold Clause, June 5, 1933″, (See: House Joint Resolution 192, 73rd Congress, 1st Session). The several States of the Union pledged the faith and credit thereof to the aid of the National Government, and formed numerous socialist committees, such as the “Council Of State Governments”, “Social Security Administration” etc., to purportedly deal with the economic “Emergency.” These Organizations operated under the “Declaration of INTERdependence” of January 22, 1937, and published some of their activities in “The Book of the States.” The 1937 edition of the Book of the States openly declared that the people engaged in such activities as the Farming/Husbandry Industry had been reduced to mere feudal “Tenants” on their Land. Book Of The States, 1937, pg. 155. This of course was compounded by such activities as price fixing wheat and grains 7 U.S.C.A. 1332, quota regulations 7 U.S.C.A. 1371, and livestock products 7 U.S.C.A. 1903, which have been consistently below the costs of production, interest on loans and inflation of the paper “Bills of Credit”, leaving the food producers and others in a state of peonage and involuntary servitude, constituting the taking of private property, for the benefit and use of others, without just compensation.
NOTE: The Council Of State governments has now been absorbed into such things as the “National Conference Of Commissioners On Uniform State Laws”, whose Headquarters Office is located at 676 North St. Clair Street, Suite 1700, Chicago, Illinois 60611, and “all” being “members of the Bar”, and operating under a different “Constitution and By Laws”, far distant from the depositories of the public Records, has promulgated, lobbied for, passed, adjudicated and ordered the implementation and execution of their purported “Uniform” and “Model” Acts and pretended statutory provisions, to “help implement international treaties of the United States or where world uniformity would be desirable.” (See: 1990/91 Reference Book, National Council Of Commissioners On Uniform State Laws, pg. 2). This is apparently what Robert Bork meant when he wrote “we are governed not by law or elected representatives but by an unelected, unrepresentative, unaccountable committee of lawyers applying no will but their own.” (See: The Tempting Of America, Robert H. Bork, pg. 130). This association has been engaged in activities such as turning “Marriage” (licensed) into “International Private Law”, through its International Liaisons, which meet at such places as the Hague Conferences (See: Handbook Of Commissioners On Uniform State Laws, 1966 Ed., pg. 156-157).
On April 25, 1938, the Supreme Court overturned the standing precedents of the prior 150 years concerning “common law,” in the Federal Government.
“THERE IS NO FEDERAL COMMON LAW, AND CONGRESS HAS NO POWER TO DECLARE SUBSTANTIVE RULES OF COMMON LAW APPLICABLE IN A STATE, WHETHER THEY BE LOCAL OR GENERAL IN THEIR NATURE, BE THEY COMMERCIAL LAW OR A PART OF THE LAW OF TORTS” (See: Erie Railroad Co. Vs. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 82 L.Ed. 1188).
The Common Law is the fountain source of Substantive and Remedial Rights, if not our very Liberties (See: Stephen, A Treaties On The Principles Of Pleading, Introduction, Pg. 23; Hemmingway, History Of Common Law Pleading As Evidence Of The Growth Of Individual Liberty And Power Of The Courts, 5 Alabama Law Journal 1; Swift vs. Tyson, 16 Peters 1, 10 L.Ed. 865; Constitution, Article III, Section 2, Amendments VII, IX and X.)
The members and association of the Bar thereafter formed committees, granted themselves special privileges, immunities and franchises, and held meetings concerning the Judicial procedures, and further, to amend laws “to conform to a trend of judicial decisions or to accomplish similar objectives”, including hodgepodging the jurisdictions of Law and Equity together, which is known today as “One Form Of Action.” (See: Constitution And By Laws, Article 3, Section 3.3(c), 1990-91 Reference Book, supra, see also, Colorado Methods of Practice, West Pub., Vol. 4, pgs. 2-3, Authors Comments.)
NOTE: The enumerated, specified and distinct Jurisdictions established by the ordained Constitution (1789), Article III, Section 2, and under the Bill of Rights (1791), Amendment VII, were further hodgpodged and fundamentally changed in 1982 to include Admiralty Jurisdiction, which was once again brought inland.
“This is the FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE necessary to effect unification of CIVIL and ADMIRALTY PROCEDURE. Just as the 1938 Rules ABOLISHED THE DISTINCTION between ACTIONS AT LAW and SUITS IN EQUITY, this change would ABOLISH THE DISTINCTION between CIVIL ACTIONS and SUITS IN ADMIRALTY.” (Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, 1982 Ed., pg. 17, also see, Federalist Papers No. 83; Declaration Of Resolves Of The First Continental Congress; Oct. 14, 1774, Declaration Of Cause And Necessity Of Taking Up Arms; July 6, 1775, Declaration of Independence; July 4, 1776, Bennet vs. Butterworth, 52 U.S. 669.)
The United States thereafter entered the Second World War during which time the “League of Nations” was reinstituted under pretense of the “United Nations” (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 287 et. seq.), and the “Bank For International Settlements” reinstituted under pretense of the “Bretton Woods Agreement” (See: 60 Stat. 1401, 22 U.S.C.A. 286 et. seq.) as the “International Monetary Fund” (The Fund) and the International Bank For Reconstruction And Development” (The Bank).
The United States as a corporate body politic (artificial) came out of World War II in worse economic shape than when it entered, and in 1950 declared Bankruptcy and “Reorganization.” The Reorganization is located in Title 5 of United States Codes Annotated. The “Explanation” at the beginning of 5 U.S.C.A. is most informative reading. The “Secretary of Treasury” was appointed as the “Receiver” in Bankruptcy. (See: Reorganization Plan No. 26, 5 U.S.C.A. 903, Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5967). The United States went down the road and periodically filed for further Reorganization. Things and situations worsened, having done what they were Commanded NOT to do, (See: Madison’s Notes , Constitutional Convention, August 16, 1787, Federalist Papers No. 44) and in 1965 passed the “Coinage Act of 1965″ completely debasing the Constitutional Coin (gold & silver i.e. Dollar). (See: 18 U.S.C.A. 331 & 332, U.S. vs. Marigold, 50 U.S. 560, 13 L.Ed. 257). At the signing of the Coinage Act on July 23, 1965, then President Lyndon B. Johnson stated in his Press Release that:
“When I have signed this bill before me, we will have made the first fundamental change in our coinage in 173 years. The Coinage Act of 1965 supersedes the Act of 1792. And that Act had the title: An Act Establishing a Mint and Regulating the Coinage of the United States….”
“Now I will sign this bill to make the first change in our coinage system since the 18th Century. To those members of Congress, who are here on this historic occasion, I want to assure you that in making this change from the 18th Century we have no idea of returning to it.”
It is important to take cognizance of the fact that NO Constitutional Amendment was ever obtained to FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE, amend, abridge or abolish the Constitutional mandates, provisions or prohibitions, but due to internal and external diversions surrounding the Viet Nam War etc., the usurpation and breach went basically unchallenged and unnoticed by the general public at large, who became “a wealthy man’s cannon fodder or cheap source of SLAVE LABOR.” (See: Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars, TM-SW7905.1, pgs. 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13 & 56). Congress was clearly delegated the Power and Authority to regulate and maintain the true and inherent “value” of the Coin within the scope and purview of Article I, Section 8, Clauses 5 & 6 and Article I, Section 10, Clause 1, of the ordained Constitution (1787), and further, under a corresponding duty and obligation to maintain said gold and silver Coin and Foreign Coin at and within the necessary and proper “equal weights and measures” clause (See also: Bible, Dueteronomy, Chapter 25, verses 13 thru 16, Proverbs, Chapter 16, verse 11, Public Law 97-289, 96 Stat. 1211).
Those exercising the Offices of the several States, in equal measure, knew such “De Facto Transitions” were unlawful and unauthorized, but sanctioned, implemented and enforced the complete debauchment and the resulting “governmental, social, industrial economic change” in the “De Jure” States and in United State of America (See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5936, 5945, 31 U.S.C.A. 314, 31 U.S.C.A 321, 31 U.S.C.A. 5112, C.R.S. 11-61-101 C.R.S. 39-22-103.5 and C.R.S. 18-11-203 ), and were and are now under the delusion that they can do both directly and indirectly what they were absolutely prohibited from doing (See: also, Federalist Papers No. 44, Craig vs. Missouri , 4 Peters 903).
In 1966, Congress being severely compromised, passed the “Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966″, by which the entire taxing and monetary system i.e. “Essential Engine” (See: Federalist Papers No. 31) was placed under the Uniform Commercial Code. (See: Public Law 89-719 , Legislative History, pg. 3722, also see; C.R.S. 5-1-106 ). The Uniform Commercial Code was of course promulgated by the National Conference of Commissioners On Uniform State Laws in collusion with American Law Institute for the “banking and business interests.” (See: Handbook Of The National Conference Of Commissioners On Uniform State Laws. (1966) Ed. pgs. 152 &153). The United States being engaged in numerous United Nation conflicts, including the Korean and the Viet Nam Conflicts, which were under direction of the United Nations (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 287d), and agreeing to foot the bill (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 287j), and not being able to honor their obligations and rehypothecated debt credit, openly and publicly dishonored and disavowed their “Notes” and “Obligations” (12 U.S.C.A. 411 ) i.e. “Federal Reserve Notes” Through Public Law 90-269, Section 2, 82 Stat. 50 (1968) to wit:
“Sec. 2. The first sentence of section 15 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 391) is amended by striking ‘and the funds provided in this Act for the redemption of Federal Reserve Notes’.”
Things steadily grew worse and on March 28, 1970, then President Nixon issued Proclamation No. 3972, declaring an “emergency” because the Postal Employees struck against the de facto government(?) for higher pay, due to inflation of the paper “Bills of Credit.” (See: Senate Report No. 93-549, pg. 596). Nixon placed the U.S. Postal Department under the control of the “Department of Defense.” (See: Department Of the Army Field Manual, FM 41-10 (1969 ed.)).
“The System had been faltering for a decade, but the bench mark date of the collapse is put at August 15, 1971. On this day, then President Nixon reversed U.S. International Monetary Policy by officially declaring the non-convertibility of the “U.S. dollar” (the Federal Reserve Note (FRN)) into gold.” (See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5937 & Senate Report No. 93-549, Foreword, pg. III, Proclamation No. 4074, pg. 597, 31 U.S.C.A. 314 & 31 U.S.C.A. 5112). On September 21, 1973, Congress passed Public Law 93-110, amending the Bretton Woods Par Value Modification Act, 82 Stat. 116, 31 U.S.C.A. 449, and reiterated the “Emergency”, 12 U.S.C.A 95a, and Section 8 of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act of 1945 (22 U.S.C.A 286f ), and which included “reports on foreign currency transactions.” (Also See: Executive Order No. 10033). This act further declared in Section 2 (b) that:
“No provision of any law in effect on the date of enactment of this Act, and no rule, regulation, or order under authority of any such law, may be construed to prohibit any person from purchasing, holding, selling, or otherwise dealing with gold.”
On January 19, 1976, Marjorie S. Holt noted for the record, a second “Declaration Of INTERdependence” and clearly identified the U.N. as a “Communist” organization, and that they were seeking both production and monetary control over the Union and People through International Organization promoting the “One World Order.” (See: Congressional Record, January 19, 1976, Extension of remarks; also see, 8 U.S.C.A. 1101 (40) , 50 U.S.C.A. 781 & 783).
The socio/economic situation worsened as noted in the Complaint/Petition, filed in the U.S. Court of Claims, Docket No. 41-76, on February 11, 1976, by 44 Federal Judges, Atkins et al. vs. U.S.. Atkins et al. complained that “As a result of inflation, the compensation of federal judges has been substantially diminished each year since 1969, causing direct and continuing monetary harm to plaintiffs…the real value of the “dollar” (FRN’s) decreased by approximately 34.5 percent from March 15, 1969 to October 1, 1975….As a result, plaintiffs have suffered an unconstitutional deprivation of earnings”, and in the prayer for relief claimed “damages for the constitutional violations enumerated above, measured as the diminution of his earnings for the entire period since March 9, 1969.” It is quite apparent that the persons holding and enjoying Offices of Public Trust, Honor and/or Profit knew of the emergency emergent problem and sought protection for themselves, to the damage and injury of the People and Children, who were classified as “a club that has many other members” who “have no remedy.” And knowing that “heinous” acts had been committed, stated that they [judges/lawyers] would not apply the Law, nor would any substantive remedy be applied (“checked more or less, but never stopped”) “until all of us [judges] are dead.” Such persons Fraudulently swore an Oath to uphold, defend and preserve the sovereignty of the Nation and several Republican States of the Union, and breached the Duty to protect the People/Citizens and their Posterity from fraud, imposition, avarice and stealthy encroachment. (See: Atkins et al. vs. U.S., 556 F.2d 1028, pg. 1072, 1074, The Tempting of America, supra, pgs. 155-159 also see, 5 U.S.C.A. 5305 & 5335, Senate Report No. 93-549, pgs. 69-71, C.R.S. 24-75-101). This is verified in Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5944, which states:
“Moving to a floating exchange rate for international commerce means private enterprise and not central governments bear the risk of currency fluctuations.”
Numerous serious debates were held in Congress, including but not limited to, Tuesday, July 27, 1976 (See: Congressional Record – House, July 27, 1976), concerning the International Financial Institutions and its operations. Representative, Ron Paul, Chairman of the House Banking Committee, made numerous references to the true practices of the “International” financial institutions, including but not limited to, the conversion of 27,000,000 (27 million) in gold, contributed by the United States as part of its “quota obligations”, which the International Monetary Fund (Governor-Secretary of Treasury) sold (See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5945 & 5946), under some very questionable terms and concessions. (Also see: The Ron Paul Money Book, (1991), by Ron Paul, Plantation Publishing, 837 W. Plantation, Clute, Texas 77531).
On October 28, 1977 the passage of Public Law 95-147, 91 Stat. 1227 declared most banking institutions, including State banks, to be under direction and control of the corporate “Governor” of the International Monetary Fund (See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5942, United States Government Manual 1990/91, pgs. 480-481). The Act further declared that:
“(2) Section 10(a) of the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 (31 U.S.C. 822a(b)) is amended by striking out the phrase ‘stabilizing the exchange value of the dollar’…”
(c) The joint resolution entitled ‘Joint resolution to assure uniform value to the coins and currencies of the United States’, approved June 5, 1933 (31 U.S.C. 463) shall not apply to obligations issued on or after the date of enactment of this section.”
The International Organizations, Corporations and Associations, had refused to pay their debts and could not pay their debts, and determined that they could pass the loss of their non-redeemable, non-current notes, bonds and evidences of debt off on others, and thereby crown their fraud with success. (See: Letter, October 26, 1989 from Department of Treasury, Russell L. Munk, Assistant General Counsel (International Affairs), as recorded in the Office of Clerk and Recorder, Baca County, Colorado, at Book, 540 Page 364). The de facto United States as Corporator, (22 U.S.C.A. 286e, et seq.) and “state” (C.R.S. 24-36-104, C.R.S. 24-60-1301, Article IV(h) ) had declared “Insolvency.” (See: 26 I.R.C. 165 (g)(1), U.C.C 1-201 (23), C.R.S. 39-22-103.5, Westfall vs. Braley. 10 Ohio 188, 75 Am. Dec. 509, Adams vs. Richardson, 337 S.W.2d 911 Ward vs. Smith, 7 Wall 447).
In 1980 Congress passed, among other things, Public Law 96-221, providing for the furtherance and expansion of the profligate rehypothecated debt pyramid scheme, and reduced the reserve requirements on “transaction accounts” to a minimum of 3% per centum to a maximum of 14 per centum (See: Depository Institutions Deregulation And Monetary Control Act of 1980, Section 103(b) (E)(2)).
“In the United States neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities. Intrinsically, a dollar bill is just a piece of paper. Deposits are merely book entries. Coins do have some intrinsic value as metal, but generally far less than their face amount….”
Compare this with the United States Constitution, which says: “No State shall make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debt…” and which also says: “Congress shall have the power to coin money and regulate the value thereof…” (Italics added for emphasis; this paragraph added to the original John B. Nelson document of February 21, 1992 on July 18, 1999 to reiterate what was stated previously in this document and to demonstrate, first hand, yet another way the Constitution is being usurped, in fact and in intent).
“In the absence of legal reserve requirements, banks can build up deposits by increasing loans and investments so long as they keep enough currency on hand to redeem whatever amounts the holders of deposits want to convert into currency. This unique attribute of the banking business was discovered several centuries ago. At one time, bankers were merely middlemen. They made profit by accepting gold and coins brought to them for safekeeping and lending them to borrowers. But they soon found that the receipts they issued to depositors were being used as money since whoever held them could go to the banker and exchange them for metallic money.
Then bankers discovered that they could make loans merely by giving borrowers their promises to pay (bank notes). In this way, banks began to create money. More notes could be issued than the gold and coin on hand because only a portion of the notes outstanding would be presented for payment at any one time. Enough metallic money had to be kept on hand, of course, to redeem whatever volume of notes was presented for payment.
Transaction deposits are the modern counter-part of bank notes. It was a small step from printing notes to making book entries to the credit of borrowers which the borrowers, in turn, could “spend” by writing checks, thereby “printing their own money.” (See: Modern Money Mechanics , a workbook on deposits currency and bank reserves., 1982 Rev. Ed., Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, P.O. Box 834, Chicago, Illinois 60690, pgs. 3 & 4).
Fifty nine (59) years is NOT “temporary.” It’s a permanent state of “Emergency”, and was clearly instituted, formed and erected within the Union through gross usurpations, abridgments, malfeasance and breach of legal duties, and the continual contrivance, misrepresentation, conversion, fluctuations, fraud and avarice of the International Financial Institutions, Organizations, Corporations and Associations, including the Federal Reserve, their “fiscal and depository agent” 22 U.S.C.A. 286d. This profligate practice has led to such “Emergency” legislation as the “Public Debt Limit-Balance Budget And Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985″, Public Law 99-177, etc.
The government by becoming a corporator, (See: 22 U.S.C.A 286e ) lays down its sovereignty and takes on that of a private citizen. It can exercise no power which is not derived from the corporate charter (See: The Bank of the United States vs. Planters Bank of Georgia, 6 L. Ed. (9 Wheat) 244, U.S. vs. Burr, 309 U.S. 242). The real party in interest is not the de jure “United States of America” or “State”, but “The Bank” and “The Fund.” (22 U.S.C.A 286, et seq., C.R.S. 11-60-103). The acts committed under fraud , force and seizures are many times done under “Letters of Marque and Reprisal” i.e. “recapture.” (See: 31 U.S.C.A. 5323 ). Such principles as “Fraud and Justice NEVER dwell together” Wingate’s Maxims 680, and “A right of action cannot arise out of fraud.” Broom’s Maxims 297, 729; Cowper’s Reports 343; 5 Scott’s New Reports 558; 10 Mass. 276; 38 Fed. 800, are too high of a thought concept, as is “Due Process”, “Just Compensation” and Justice itself. Honor is earned by honesty and integrity, not under false and fraudulent pretenses, nor will the color of the cloth one wears cover-up the usurpations, lies, trickery and deceits. When Black is fraudulently declared to be White, not all will live in darkness. As astutely observed by Will Rogers, “there are men running governments who shouldn’t be allowed to play with matches”, and is as applicable today as Jesus’ statements about Lawyers.
The contrived “emergency” has created numerous abuses and usurpations, and abridgments of delegated Powers and Authority. As stated in Senate Report 93-549:
“Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency. In fact, there are now in effect four presidentially proclaimed states of national emergency: In addition to the national emergency declared by President Roosevelt in 1933, there are also the national emergency proclaimed by President Truman on December 16, 1950, during the Korean conflict, and the states of national emergency declared by President Nixon on March 23, 1970, and August 15, 1971.
These proclamations give force to 470 provisions of Federal Law. These hundreds of statutes delegate to the President extraordinary powers, ordinarily exercised by the Congress, which affect the lives of American citizens in a host of all-encompassing manners. This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal constitutional process.
Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens.” (See: Foreword, pg. III).
The “Introduction”, on page 1, begins with a phenomenal declaration, to wit:
“A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in varying degrees been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency…”
According to the research done in 16 American Jurisprudence, 2nd Edition, Sections 71 and 82, no “emergency” justifies a violation of any Constitutional provision. Arguendo, “Supremacy Clause” and “Separation of Powers”, it is clearly admitted in Senate Report No. 93-549 that abridgment has occurred. The statements heard in the federal and state Tribunals, on numerous occasions, that Constitutional arguments are “immaterial”, “frivolous” etc., is based upon the concealment, furtherance and compounding of the Frauds and “Emergency” created and sustained by the “Expatriated”, ALIENS of the United Nations and its Organizations, Corporations and Associations. (See: Letter , Insight Magazine, February 18, 1991, pg. 7, Lowell L. Flanders, President, U.N. Staff Union, New York) 8 U.S.C.A. 1481 is one of the controlling statutes on expatriation, as is 22 U.S.C.A. 611, 612 & 613 and 50 U.S.C.A. 781.
The Internal Revenue Service entered into a “service agreement” with the U.S. Treasury Department (See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26) and the Agency for International Development, pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 91. The Agency For International Development is an International paramilitary operation (See: Department Of The Army Field Manual, (1969) FM 41-10, pgs. 1-4, Sec. 1-7(b) & 1-6, Section 1-10(7) (c)(1), 22 U.S.C.A. 284), and includes such activities as “Assumption of full or partial executive, legislative, and judicial authority over a country or area.” (See: FM 41-10, pg. 1-7, Section 110(7)(c)(4)) also see, Agreement Between The United Nations And The United States Of America Regarding The Headquarters Of the United Nations, Section 7(d) & (8), 22 U.S.C.A 287 (1979 Ed.) at pg. 241). It is to be further observed that the “Agreement” regarding the Headquarters District of the United Nations was NOT agreed to (See: Congressional Record – Senate, December 13, 1967, Mr. Thurmond), and is illegally in the Country in the first instant.
The International Organizational intents, purposes and activities include complete control of “Public Finance” i.e. “control, supervision, and audit of indigenous fiscal resources; budget practices, taxation, expenditures of public funds, currency issues, and banking agencies and affiliates.” (See: FM 41-10, pgs.2-30 thru 2-31, Section 251. Public Finance). This of course complies with “Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars” Research Technical Manual TM-SW7905.1, which discloses a declaration of war upon the American people (See: pg. 3 & 7), monetary control by the Internationalist, through information etc. solicited and collected by the Internal Revenue Service ( See: TM-SW7905.1 , pg. 48, also see, 22 U.S.C.A 286f & Executive order No. 10033, 26 U.S.C.A 6103 (k)(4)) and who is operating and enforcing the seditious International program. (See: TM-SW7905.1, pg. 52). The 1985 Edition of the Department Of Army Field Manual, FM 41-10 further describes the International “Civil Affairs” operations. At page 3-6 it is admitted that the A.I.D. is autonomous and under direction of the International Development Cooperation Agency, and at page 3-8 that the operation is “paramilitary.” The International Organization(s) intents and purposes was to promote, implement, and enforce a “DICTATORSHIP OVER FINANCE IN THE UNITED STATES.” (See: Senate Report No. 93-549, pg. 186).
It appears from the documentary evidence that the Internal Revenue Service Agents. etc., are “Agents of a Foreign Principal” within the meaning and intent of the “Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938.” They are directed and controlled by the corporate “Governor” of “The Fund” a/k/a “Secretary of Treasury” (See: Public Law 94-564, supra, pg. 5942, U.S. Government Manual 1990/91, pgs. 480 & 481, 26 U.S.C.A 7701 (a)(11), Treasury Delegation Order No. 150-10), and the corporate “Governor” of “The Bank” 22 U.S.C.A 286 & 286a, acting as “information-service employees” 22 U.S.C.A. 611 (c)(ii), and have been and do now “solicit, collect, disburse or dispense” contribution [Tax-pecuniary contribution, Blacks Law Dic. 5th ed.], loans, money or other things of value for or in interest of such foreign principal 22 U.S.C.A 611(c)(iii), and they entered into agreements with a Foreign Principal pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 91 i.e. the “Agency For International Development.” (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 611 (c)(2) ). The Internal Revenue Service is also an agency of the International Criminal Police Organization, and solicits and collects information for 150 Foreign Powers. (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 263a, The United States Government Manual, 1990/91, pg. 385, see also, The Ron Paul Money Book, pg. 250 – 251). It should be further noted that Congress has appropriated, transferred, and converted vast sums to Foreign Powers (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 262c(b)), and has entered into numerous foreign Taxing Treaties (conventions) (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 285g, 22 U.S.C.A. 287j) and other Agreements, which are solicited and collected pursuant to 26 I.R.C. 6103(k)(4). Along with the other documentary evidence submitted herewith, this should absolve any further doubt as to the true character of the party. Such restrictions as “For the general welfare and common defense of the United States” (See: Constitution (1787), Article I, Section 8, Clause 1) apparently aren’t applicable, and the fraudulent rehypothecated debt credit will be merely added to the insolvent nature of the continual “emergency”, and the reciprocal socio/economic repercussions laid upon present and future generations.
Among other reasons for lack of authority to act, such as a Foreign Agents Registration Statement, 22 U.S.C.A. 612 and 18 U.S.C.A. 219 & 951, military authority cannot be imposed into civil affairs. (See: Department Of The Army Pamphlet 27100-70, Military Law Review, Vol. 70). The United Nations Charter, Article 2, Section 7, further prohibits the U.N. from “intervening in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state…” Korea, Viet Nam, Ethiopia, Angola, Kuwait, etc., etc., are evidence enough of the “BAD FAITH” of the United Nations and its Organizations, Corporations and Associations, not to mention the seizing of two day care centers in the State of Minnesota by their agents, and holding the children as collateral/hostages for payment/ransom of their fraudulent, dishonored, rehypothecated debt credit, worthless securities. Such is the “Rule Of Law” “as envisioned by the Founders” of the United Nations. Such is Communist terrorism, despotism and tyranny. ALL WERE AND ARE OUTLAWED HERE.
I hope this communication finds you well and mentally strong for the occasion. It is quite apparent that the “Treasonous” and “Seditious” are brewing up a storm of untold magnitude. Bush’s public address of September 11, 1991 (See: Weekly Compilation Of Presidential Documents), should further qualify what is being said here. He admitted “Interdependence” (See also: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5950), “One World Order” (See: also: Extension Of Remarks, January 19, 1976, Marjorie S. Holt, 8 U.S.C.A. 1101(40)), affiliation and collusion with the Soviet Union Oligarchy (50 U.S.C.A. 781), direction by the U.N., 22 U.S.C.A. 611, etc. You might also find it interesting that Treasury Delegation Order No. 92 (enclosed) states that the I.R.S. is trained under direction of the Division of “Human Resources” (U.N.) and the Commissioner (INTERNATIONAL), by the “Office Of Personnel Management.” In the 1979 Edition of 22 U.S.C.A. 287, The United Nations, at pg. 248, you will find Executive Order No. 10422. The Office of Personnel Management is under direction of the Secretary General of the United Nations. And as stated previously, the I.R.S. is also a member in a one hundred fifty (150) nation pact called the “International Criminal Police Organization”, found at 22 U.S.C.A. 263a. The “Memorandum & Agreement” between the Secretary of Treasury/Corporate Governor of “The Fund” and “The Bank” and the Office of the U.S. Attorney General would indicate that the Attorney General and his associates are soliciting and collecting information for Foreign Principals. (See: also, The United States Government Manual 1990/91, pg. 385, also see, The Ron Paul Money Book, supra, pg. 250, 251, 26 I.R.C. 7401).
It is worthy of note that an Attorney/Representative is required to file a “Foreign Agents Registration Statement” pursuant to 22 U.S.C.A. 611(c)(1)(iv) & 612, if representing the interests of a Foreign Principal or Power. (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 613, Rabinowitz vs. Kennedy, 376 U.S. 605, 11 L. Ed. 2d 940, 18 U.S.C.A. 219 & 951).
On January 17, 1980, the President and Senate confirmed another “Constitution”, namely, the “Constitution of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization”, found at Senate, Treaty Document No. 97-19, 97th Congress, 1st Session. A perusal of this Foreign Constitution should more than qualify the internationalist intents. The “Preamble”, Article 1, “Objectives” and Article 2, “Functions”, clearly evidences their intent to direct, control, finance and subsidize all “natural and human resources” and “agro-related as well as basic industries”, through “dynamic social and economic changes” “with a view to assisting in the establishment of a new international economic order.” The high flown rhetoric is obviously of “Communist” origin and intents. An unelected, unrepresentative, unaccountable oligarchy of expatriates and aliens, who fraudulently claim in the Preamble that they intend to establish “rational and equitable international economic relations”, yet openly declared that they no longer “stabilize the value of the dollar” nor “assure the value of the coin and currency of the United States” is purely misrepresentation, deceit and fraud. (See: Public Law 95-147, 91 Stat. 1227, at pg. 1229). This was augmented by Public Law 101-167, 103 Stat. 1195, which discloses massive appropriations of rehypothecated debt credit for the general welfare and common defense of other Foreign Powers, including “Communist ” countries of satellites, International control of natural and human resources, etc., etc. A “Resource” is a claim of “property” and when related to people constitutes “slavery.”
It is now necessary to ask which Constitution they are operating under. The “Constitution For The Newstates Of The United States”, which was located at Liberty Lobby, 300 Independence Ave., SE, Washington, D.C. 20003, was the subject matter of the book entitled “The Emerging Constitution” by Rexford G. Tugwell, which was accomplished under the auspices of the Rockefeller tax-exempt foundation called the “Center For The Study of Democratic Institutions.” The People and Citizens of this Nation were forewarned against formation of “Democracies.” “Democracies have ever been the spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.” (See: Federalist Papers No. 10, also see, The Law, Fredrick Bastiat, Code Of Professional Responsibility, Preamble). This Alien Constitution, however, has nothing to do with democracy in reality. It is the basis of and for a despotic, tyrannical oligarchy.
Article I, “Rights and Responsibilities”, Sections 1 and 15 evidence their knowledge of the “emergency.” The Rights of expression, communication, movement, assembly, petition and Habeas Corpus are all excepted from being exercised under and in a “declared emergency.” The Constitution for the Newstates of America, openly declares, among other seditious things and delusions that “Until each indicated change in the government shall have been completed the provisions of the existing Constitution and the organs of government shall be in effect” (See: Article XII, Section 3), “All operations of the national government shall cease as they are replaced by those authorized under this Constitution.” (See: Article XII, Section 4). This is apparently what Burger was promoting in 1976, after he resigned as Supreme Court Justice and took up the promotion of a “Constitutional Convention.” No trial by jury is mentioned, “JUST” compensation has been removed, along with being informed of the “Nature & Cause of the Accusation”. etc., etc., and every one will of course participate in the “democracy.” This Constitution is but a reiteration of the Communist Doctrines, intents and purposes, and clearly establishes a “Police Power” State, under direction and control of a self appointed oligarchy.
Apparently the present operation of the “de facto” government is under Foreign/Alien Constitutions, Laws, Rules and Regulations. The overthrow of the “essential engine” declared in and by the ordained and established Constitution for the United States of America (1787), and by and under the “Bill of Rights” (1791) is obvious. The covert procedure used to implement and enforce these Foreign Constitutions, Laws, Procedures, Rules, Regulations, etc., has not, to my knowledge, been collected and assimilated nor presented as evidence to establish seditious collusion and conspiracy.
Fortunately and Unfortunately in my Land it is necessary to seek, obtain and present EVIDENCE to sustain a conviction and/or judgment. Our patience and tolerance for those who pervert the very necessary and basic foundations of society has been pushed to insufferable levels. They have “fundamentally” changed the form and substance of the de jure Republican form of Government, exhibited a willful and wanton disregard for the Rights, Safety and Property of others, evinced a despotic design to reduce my people to slavery, peonage and involuntary servitude, under a fraudulent, tyrannical, seditious foreign oligarchy, with intent and purpose to institute, erect and form a “Dictatorship” over the Citizens and our Posterity. They have completely debauched the de jure monetary system, destroyed the Livelihood and Lives of thousands, aided and abetted our enemies, declared War upon us and our Posterity, destroyed untold families and made homeless over 750,000 children in the middle of winter, afflicted widows and orphans, turned Sodomites loose amongst our young, implemented foreign laws, rules, regulations and procedures within the body of the country, incited insurrection, rebellion, sedition and anarchy within the de jure society, illegally entered our Land, taken false Oaths, entered into Seditious Foreign Constitutions, Agreements, Pactions, Confederations, and Alliances, and under pretense of “emergency”, which they themselves created, promoted and furthered, formed a multitude of offices and retained those of alien allegiance to perpetuate their frauds and to eat out the substance of the good and productive people of our Land, and have arbitrarily dismissed and held mock trials for those who trespassed upon our Lives, Liberties, Properties and Families and endangered our Peace, Safety, Welfare and Dignity. The damage, injury and costs have been higher than mere money can repay. They have done what they were COMMANDED NOT TO DO. The time for just correction is NOW!
Sincere consideration of “Presentment” to a Grand Jury under the ordained and established Constitution for the United States of America (1787), Amendment V is in order. Numerous High Crimes and Misdemeanors have been committed under the Constitution for the United States of America, and Laws made in pursuance thereof, and under the Constitution for the State of Colorado, and the Laws made in Pursuance thereof, and against the Peace and Dignity of the People, including but not limited to, C.R.S. 18-11-203 which defines and prescribes punishment for “Seditious Associations” which is applicable to the other constitutions, and the intents and professed purposes of their Organizations, Corporations and Associations. If the Presentment should be obstructed by the members of the Bar, ARREST THEM.