Once upon a time before the year 1066 the people of England held
Allodial title to their land. Not even the king could take the land for
not paying a tithe. William the Conquer came in 1066 and stole the Kings
Title and took the land of the people. From William I, 1066, to King
John, 1199, England was in dire straits. It was bankrupt.
The King invoked the Law of Mortmain, the dead man's hand, so people
couldn't pass their land on to the church or anyone else without the
King's permission, (modern day probate?). Without Mortmain the King
would lose the land he controlled. The Vatican didn't like that because
the King owed a lot of pounds to the Vatican.(WHY?)(1). King John
refused to accept The Vatican's representative, Stephen Langton, whom
Pope Innocent III installed to rule England(religious or in fact?)(2) In
1208 England was placed under Papal interdict(?). Interdict means a
prohibition.)
King John was excommunicated and in trying to regain his stature he
groveled before the Pope and returned the title to his kingdoms of
England and Ireland to the Pope as vassals, and swore submission and
loyalty to him. King John accepted Langton as Archbishop of Canterbury,
and offered the Pope a vassal's bond of fealty and homage. Two months
later, in July of 1213, King John was absolved of excommunication, at
Winchester, by the returned Archbishop of Canterbury, Langton. On
October 3, 1213, by treaty, King John ratified his surrender of his
kingdoms to the Pope, as Vicar of Christ who claimed ownership of
everything and everyone on earth as tradition.
Question 1. Where in the Bible did Jesus give any man this kind of
power over all men and land? He didn't. He did not create a religion nor
did he create the office of Pope.
Question 2. Can you have a third party break a contract between you
and another person under duress..? Don't those of you who are forced
into a contract reserve all your rights under modern UCC 1-207 and claim
UCC 1-103?
The contract (treaty of 1213) was between two parties. Now the
Barons of England would not put up with being slaves anymore so they
took to the sword and made King John sign the Magna Charta. So doesn't
this act of the Barons violate the principle of natural law, when they
created the Magna Charta, as having no force and effect upon a contract
between two parties? Well Pope Innocent III, the other contracting party
thought so, for he declared the Magna Charta to be: ". . .unlawful and
unjust as it is base and shameful. . . whereby the Apostolic See is
brought into contempt, the Royal Prerogative diminished, the English
outraged, and the whole enterprise of the Crusade greatly imperiled."
Quoted from G.R.C. Davis: Magna Charta. Trustee of the British Museum.
London. 1965.
The Pope, in order to introduce strife in England and Ireland that
would help him, used Jesus teachings to his advantage that is verified
in the Gospels by two of His Apostles. So St. Levy (Mark 2:14; Luke
5:27), alias Matthew, cites Jesus at Matthew 10::34-36 and Luke 12:49,
51-3. Nothing reveals the antithesis of government and religion more
clearly than these facts.
Question 3. What did the contract of 1213 A.D. create? A TRUST or
CONTRACT. Only the two parties, the King's heirs and the Pope, can break
the contract. For the Trust /Contract cannot be broken as long as there
are heirs to both sides of the contract.
At this time in history we now know who controlled the Kings of
England and the land of the world. For Now we have the Pope claiming the
whole Western Hemisphere besides Europe. The Holy See of Antioch ruled
all the easterly side and the Holy See of Alexandria ruled the western
side, so there was a conflict. (3)
So, on with the story. The King's explorers had come to America to
claim dominion over land by deceiving and murdering the natives, the
American Indians. The King operated under the treaty of 1213 and
everything was going along okay until the 1770's when the bunch of
rogues called the "Founding Fathers" decided they wanted the benefits
but not pay the taxes to the King. They, being lawyers, and professional
educated men, didn't know they were still under the Pope's control?
Their lies and fraud now would affect the American colonies and the
people who lived on the land.
Those common people who fought in the American Revolution were
unaware that the 1213 treaty still ruled despite the fact they THOUGHT
the Magna Charta was a viable piece of work.(4) The Declaration of
Rights in 1689 declared the Rights of the British subjects in England.
At the end of the English Declaration it stated at Section III " ...that
should any of the Rights just mentioned be in violation of the HOLY
ALLIANCE (1213 Treaty), ...it is as if this Declaration was never
written".
So we know that the English Declaration didn't fly, so what makes you
think the 1774 Declaration of Rights in this British Colony would work.
Weren't these people doing the same thing as the Barons did in 1215
A.D. to King John? A contract is a contract. Look at Article 1, Section
10, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution. Can anyone obligate a contract?
Were the "founding fathers" trying to obligate a contract between two
parties that still have heirs living today?
Question 4. How important is the "ultimate benefactor", the Pope,
The HOLY SEE, in the scheme of things? Move through history till modern
times and pull Public Law 88-244, which follows Public Law 88-243 - the
institution of the law- merchants Uniform Commercial Code. Are you
shocked that the Pope is listed in this Public Law?
Doesn't the United States have an ambassador in the Vatican? Why?
Is it a government like all other nations such as France, Japan, Spain
or Brazil? The Vatican runs the world, it controls the British Crown. Is
it any wonder they separate man's Church and government? They don't
talk about the Lord Almighty's Church (government) do they.(5)
"Organized churches" are given special tax privileges because the
Vatican dictates to the sixty United States trustees through the trust
document, the U.S. Constitution created by the 1783 treaty between the
King, frontman for the Vatican, and Adams, Hartly, Laurens, &
Franklin who were operating for the King and not the people of America.
Look at Article VI of the Constitution for the United States for your
answer as stated in the "New History of America".(6)
You see we are still under the Pope who rules over all nations as he
declared he did back in 1213. The 1783 Treaty did say in the opening
statement quoted exactly as it appears in olde English; "It having
pleafed the Divine Providence to difpofe the hearts of the Moft Serene
and Moft Porent Prince, George the Third, by the grace of God, King of
the Great Britain, France and Ireland, Defender, of the Faith , Duke of
Brunfwick and Laurenberg, Arch-Treafurer and PRINCE ELECTOR OF THE HOLY
ROMAN EMPIRE, & C. AND OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, . . .."
(Emphasis added in caps).
Did you catch the last few words? This is from a King (man) who can
supposedly make no claim over the United States of America because he
was defeated? The King claims God gave him the almighty power to say
that no man can ever own property because it, "goes against the tenets
of his church, the Vatican/Holy Roman Empire, because the King is the
"Elector of the Holy Roman Empire’"
What about the secret Treaty of Verona, made the 22nd of November,
1822, which shows the power of the Pope and the Vatican's interest in
the US Republic.
Here is part of The Secret Treaty of Verona. "The undersigned
specially authorized to make some additions to the treaty of the Holy
Alliance, after having exchanged their respective credentials, have
agreed as follows:
ARTICLE I. The high contracting powers being convinced that the system
of representative government is equally as incompatible with the
monarchial principles as the maxim of the sovereignty of the people with
the divine right, engage mutually, in the most solemn manner to use all
their efforts to put an end to the system of representative
governments, in what ever country it may exist in Europe, and to prevent
its being introduced in those countries where it is not yet known.
ARTICLE 2. As it cannot be doubted that the liberty of the press is the
most powerful means used by the pretended supporters of the rights of
nations to the detriment of those of princes, the high contracting
parties promise reciprocally to adopt all proper measures to suppress
it, not only in their own state but also in the rest of Europe.
ARTICLE 3. Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most
powerfully to keep nations in the state of passive obedience which they
owe to their princes, the high contracting parties declare it to be
their intention to sustain in their respective states, those measures
which the clergy may adopt with the aim of ameliorating their own
interests, so intimately connected with the preservation of the
authority of the princes; and the contracting powers join in offering
their thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for them, and
solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the
nations."
Do we have a false God before us and worship him and his church
instead of the real Lord, Jesus and his government. The divine right of
kings exists in Clinton and every Governor of the states in corporate
Union. Well let me go on record and say that the Lord gave me the same
right as the Pope claims was given to him. Am I not a Steward upon the
land of the Lord as a mere sojourner, the same as the Pope? Are not you
also a Steward?
Did the Lord make a covenant with Adam and Eve to subdue the earth
and reign over the animals and to populate the earth? Doesn't that
contract still exist? And doesn't it exist with you also? And we, the
true believers in that contract, can we take all the nations (mans) laws
in the world and dump them in the ocean to regain our rightful place on
this earth under the Lord's Natural Law to thwart the contract between
King John and the Pope that appears to defeat the original contract the
Lord made with man?
Yes, let us go back to the original contract and destroy the
Vatican's control over everybody. Before 1066 the Pope did not claim all
the land as the people claimed the land and didn't pay taxes on it to
anybody. Didn't the Lord say to the people after coming out of Egypt,
"why do you want a king when you have me and my contract?" Which Lord do
you want to live under, a Pope, a King, President, Governors, Senators,
Representatives, or a real Lord called Jesus Christ. "Christians," are
ridiculed and put down because they read the Word of the Lord correctly
and could defeat even the best the Pope has to throw at them.
The King James version of the Bible is just that. A version concocted
by the King under the guidance of the Pope so as to hide the real
truth. I was taught by the church I went to, which is government
controlled as it has to be by the treaty of 1213 and reiterated in the
1783 Treaty between The Pope's Elector, King John and the First
President of the United States, Sam Huntington and Charles Thompson,
Secretary. I read the passage, when Jesus was on the cross, from a very
old manuscript that said, "Forgive them NOT, for they know what they
do." This is different than what most people believe he said, "Forgive
them for they know not what they do." Bottom line is that when men
write, transcribe, translate, update, and copy over thousands of years
they always alter the interpretation, words and insert their own
meanings. You can see this in just the 200 years that our country became
separated from England, but still remains a colony under different
compact and use of clever wording. But that is another whole subject
that you do not know about.
Eminent domain and Allodial title:
Why and where did "eminent domain" rear its ugly head? Right after the
King's government was formed here in America. Eminent domain replaced
the Law of Mortmain of England and when government wanted your land they
claimed eminent domain thereby destroying that to what people think
they have allodial title. Allodial title only existed in America when
the King granted the use of the land to the likes of William Penn,
.........
But it could be taken at any time. Are you or were your great, great,
great grandfathers ever free to hold land that could never be taken
away? Ask some of today's farmers and see how many lost their farms to
the government that belonged to their past family and I'll bet none of
the land goes back to the 1789 era. Well it's a wonderful world to live
in the end times, isn't it. Read Revelations to see where the false
preachers come from. Who is the "Harlot" in Revelations?
Does the Vatican come close with a mortal calling himself the "vicar" of Christ?
Here is the definition of vicar in Webster's 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language.
Vicar: "In a general sense, a person deputed or authorized to perform the functions of another; a substitute in office."
The Pope PRETENDS to be vicar of Jesus Christ on earth.
Pretend; To hold out as a false appearance; to offer something
feigned instead of that which is real; To exhibit as a cover for
something hidden."
You bet your life the Pope has something to hide. He is no more
powerful than You. The King is no more powerful than You. The American
President and Governor's are no more powerful than You. You allow THEM
run your lives ...WHY.?
Thinkers, you cannot fight the Pope or the King on their contract
even though you are affected by the contract. You must go elsewhere for
relief. Remember the first contract in history, God with Adam and Eve?
You had better because you were a part of it as an heir and it is your
saving grace. Why do you think the "courts of common law" are despised
and Government and States are taking action to stop them? See where the
power lies when this happens? Clinton, the Governors, and Congress of
the United States and the Legislatures of the several states are only
following orders and delegate to the 60 U.S. Trustees, who always show
up in bankruptcy generated mostly by IRS actions. Isn't that a starting
point?
What do Trustees administer? A trust? The Constitution is a trust,
correct? It was created by the 1783 Treaty, correct? It is not the
private man's trust contract, correct? Only those entering into the
contract are UNDER the constitution and are bound by it, correct? Look
up the definition of "under" in words and phrases and a good dictionary
such as Webster's 1828 at Vol. II, 101. I, my dear readers, am not
"under" some damn corporate trust (constitution) drafted in secrecy by
the King and corporate lawyer esquires (you call them the "Founding
Fathers") whom were controlled by the Treaty of 1213, wherein the
Vatican still ruled over all. It was never "my constitution" and never
will be. The Constitution does not apply to me nor will it ever.
However, some of the states' representatives in 1776 realized that
the Constitution was a commercial contract among the Founding Fathers to
protect their financial interests in the Americas and in Europe. The
Articles of the Bill of Rights is designed to keep those United States
citizens whom are bound by the Constitution (contract) from encroaching
upon my natural Law Rights, (With this hint in mind you may discover
where the IRS gets its purported power that makes you liable, because
you claim to be UNDER the constitution, but they will never admit it
because only a few know the real reason and they are not about to tell
their agents. The same goes for any license issued to you by the
corporate States). I hope you have read the Supreme Court cases of State
and United States cited in my previous books that prove beyond any
shadow of a doubt I am correct in my previous two sentences. Yet you
always fall back into the trap by claiming citizenship of the United
States AND THE STATES.
No! You are not a citizen of the corporate or organic State if you
want to be free. You cannot claim it is your constitution and remain
free. You cannot claim representatives in the legislatures and remain
free. How about your estate? State and Estate come from the same
contract.
Webster's 1828 Dictionary defines it;
"ESTA'TE, n. 1. In a general sense, fixedness; a condition; now
generally written and pronounced state. (6) The general interest of
business or government; hence a political body; a commonwealth; a
republic.
But in this sense, we now use State." Get the picture? We are the
ryots tenure holding the "estate" of the King called your estate. Belong
to a body politic and you are a slave. In my previous books I told the
people a "republic" is a fraud, for then you belong to the estate of the
King which makes you a law-merchant holding as a trustee the King's
land that he is holding in trust for the Vatican. The States are the
"estate " of the Vatican/King cabal with the money changers along for
the ride are a full blown consortium which includes the
Congress/President/ Governors et al. I don't want to drive you crazy,
since you might not comprehend all that is here. Once you know the truth
and let go of all you were taught by the government and the preachers
you don't become the drowning man grasping at the lies to stay afloat.
Have you ever wondered why you were sinking while pleading case law and
their constitution to protect you?
Bye till next time,
The Informer
(1)(WHY?). Because the Pope claimed all lands as the vicar of Christ
and the king owed money from the Vatican that was to be collected by the
Church of England. The church reduced their parishioners to mere
serfdom. When they died the church got the property and the King, in
order to preserve what property he had instituted the law of Mortmain.
This prevented the people from willing the land to the Pope. When the
pope got wind of this he excommunicated the King. That's the explanation
for the Why?
(2) This is a fact that is documented in the English documents of History at the Leeds Library.
(3)The conflict between each of the Holy Sees, one controlling the
western front (America) and the other controlling the China side with
the dividing line somewhere in Spain and France through Germany. The
Pope is the figurehead, remember and the best way to explain it is
Congress is Alexandria and the Senate is Antioch.
(4) (Why doesn't the Magna Charta hold more force and effect than a
later contract between the king and the Pope? Because the Pope decreed
it null and void as it would break the contract he had initiated with
the King. The Magna Charta was a contract breaker by third parties and
that was a no-no in any law.
Besides the Pope owned England and how
could the Barons take the land that the King pledged let alone all the
surfs that the Pope still controlled through the church of England? He
can't and so the Magna Charta was declared Void. Now the Pope, through
the front man, The King, could create the other contracts called
treaties and no one is the wiser. Remember, the Pope was being
controlled by the creditor, The Rothschilds to whom the Pope was
indebted.
(5) Why? It is clear as a bell. The "church" of GOD is 'Government of
GOD and man created all these religions and made churches for them.
They, man, cannot allow the Government of the Lord "Church upon this
rock" to get in the way of the government of men, now can they?
(6) "New History of America", by The Informer
People you can read this for yourself in American Council of
Christian Laymen: "How Red Is The Federal Council of Churches", Madison,
Wisconsin, 1949. Now you may better understand James Montgomery's
latest as to why all the declarations, Magna Charta, etc. have no
effect. Read on to see why.
See: James Montgomery's - "British Colony III" on the Internet. To
further prove what I say that the declared rights were also at the mercy
of any previous charters or grants from the king of England you must
read section 25 of the 1776 North Carolina Constitution, Declaration of
Rights which states;09"And provided further, that nothing herein
contained shall affect the titles or possessions of individuals holding
or claiming under the laws heretofore in force, or grants heretofore
made by the late King George II, or his predecessors, or the late lords
proprietors, or any of them."
http://michiganassembly.info/index.php/forum/welcome-mat/119-treaty-of-1213-the-beginning-of-the-lie
Showing posts sorted by date for query Sovereignty and the Crown. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query Sovereignty and the Crown. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Monday, January 15, 2018
Wednesday, January 3, 2018
THE UNITED STATES IS STILL A BRITISH COLONY EXTORTING TAXES FOR THE CROWN!
THE UNITED STATES
IS STILL A BRITISH COLONY
EXTORTING TAXES FOR THE CROWN!
A DOCUMENTARY REVIEW
OF CHARTERS AND TREATIES
August 17, 1996
PART ONE of SEVEN PARTS
The United States is still a British Colony
On March 10, 1819, the Virginia legislature passed Act No. 280
(Virginia Archives of Richmond, “misc.” file, p. 299 for micro- film):
Indiana published the new Amendment in the Indiana Revised Laws, of 1831 on P. 20. The Northwest Territories published the new Amendment in 1833; Ohio published the new Amendment again in 1831 and in 1833. Connecticut, one of the states that voted against the new Amendment published the new Amendment in 1835. Wisconsin Territory published the new Amendment in 1839; Iowa Territory published the new Amendment in 1843;
Ohio published the new Amendment again, in 1848; Kansas published the new Amendment in 1855; and Nebraska Territory published the new Amendment six years in a row from 1855 to 1860. Colorado Territory published the new Amendment in 1865 and again 1867, in the 1867 printing, the present Thirteenth Amendment (slavery Amendment) was listed as the Fourteenth Amendment. The repeated reprinting of the Amended united States Constitution is conclusive evidence of its passage.
Also, as evidence of the new Thirteenth Amendments impending passage; on December 2, 1817 John Quincy Adams, then Secretary of State, wrote to Buck (an attorney) regarding the position Buck had been assigned. The letter reads:
After the War of 1812 was concluded the Treaty of Ghent was signed and ratified (footnote 6). In Article 4 of the Treaty, the United States gained what was already given in the Treaty of Paris 1783, namely islands off the U.S. Coast. Also, two men were to be given the power to decide the borders and disagreements, if they could not, the power was to be given to an outside sovereign power and their decision was final and considered conclusive.
In Article 9, it is admitted there are citizens and subjects in America. As you have seen, the two terms are interchangeable, synonymous. In Article 10 you will see where the idea for the overthrow of this country came from and on what issue. The issue raised by England was slavery and it was nurtured by the king’s emissaries behind the scenes. This would finally lead to the Civil War, even though the Supreme Court had declared the states and their citizens property rights could not be infringed on by the United States government or Congress.
This was further declared by the following Presidential quotes, where they declared to violate the states rights would violate the U.S. Constitution. Also, history shows that slavery would not have existed much longer in the Southern states, public sentiment was changing and slavery was quickly disappearing. The Civil War was about destroying property rights and the U.S. Constitution which supported these rights. Read the following quotes of Presidents just before the Civil War:
The southern States were not fighting so much for the slave issue, but for the right to own property, any property. These property rights were granted by the king in the Treaty of 1783, knowing they would soon be forfeited by the American people through ignorance. Do you think you own your house? If you were to stop paying taxes, federal or state, you would soon find out that you were just being allowed to live and pay rent for this house. The rent being the taxes to the king, who supplied the benefit of commerce.
A free man not under a monarch, democracy, dictatorship or socialist government, but is under a republican form of government would not and could not have his property taken. Why! The king’s tax would not and could not be levied. If the Americans had been paying attention the first 70 years to the subterfuge and corruption of the Constitution and government representatives, instead of chasing the money supplied by the king, the Conquest of this country during the Civil War could have been avoided. George Washington had vision during the Revolutionary War, concerning the Civil War. You need to read it. (Footnote 7)
END PART ONE
Top of page
Proceed To PART TWO
THREE
FOUR
FIVE
SIX
Copyright acknowledgment: Presented as free information in public domain.
Format editing by: ELDON WARMAN
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
COMMON LAW Homepage
https://scannedretina.com/2014/11/17/suspicion-confirmed/
IS STILL A BRITISH COLONY
EXTORTING TAXES FOR THE CROWN!
A DOCUMENTARY REVIEW
OF CHARTERS AND TREATIES
August 17, 1996
PART ONE of SEVEN PARTS
An introduction by the “Informer”
This is the latest from a man who visits me quite
often. He and another man researched my theory that we have never been
free from the British Crown. This disc shows the results. I have stated
that we will never win in their courts. This shows conclusively why. We
have the hard copy of the treaties that are the footnotes. This predates
Schroder’s material, my research of the 1861 stats by Lincoln that put
us under the War Powers confiscation acts, and John Nelson’s material.
All our material supports that the real Principal, the King of England, still rules this country through the bankers and why we own no property in allodium. This is why it is so important to start OUR courts of God’s natural (common) Law and break away from all the crap they have handed us. This is one reason Virginia had a law to hang all lawyers but was somehow, by someone, (the King) set aside to let them operate again. Some good people put in the original 13th amendment so that without the lawyers the King could not continue his strangle hold on us.
James shows how that was quashed by the King. I am happy that James’ research of six months bears out my theory, that most people would not listen to me, that we are still citizen/subjects under the kings of England. My article called “Reality” published in the American Bulletin and the article of mine on the “Atocha case,” wherein Florida in 1981 used it’s sovereignty under the British crown to try to take away the gold from the wreck found in Florida waters supports this premise.
James makes mention of the Law dictionaries being England’s Law Dictionary. You will note it lists the reign of all the Kings of England. It never mentions the reign of the Presidents of this country. Ever wonder Why?
Get this out to as many people as you can.
The Informer.
All our material supports that the real Principal, the King of England, still rules this country through the bankers and why we own no property in allodium. This is why it is so important to start OUR courts of God’s natural (common) Law and break away from all the crap they have handed us. This is one reason Virginia had a law to hang all lawyers but was somehow, by someone, (the King) set aside to let them operate again. Some good people put in the original 13th amendment so that without the lawyers the King could not continue his strangle hold on us.
James shows how that was quashed by the King. I am happy that James’ research of six months bears out my theory, that most people would not listen to me, that we are still citizen/subjects under the kings of England. My article called “Reality” published in the American Bulletin and the article of mine on the “Atocha case,” wherein Florida in 1981 used it’s sovereignty under the British crown to try to take away the gold from the wreck found in Florida waters supports this premise.
James makes mention of the Law dictionaries being England’s Law Dictionary. You will note it lists the reign of all the Kings of England. It never mentions the reign of the Presidents of this country. Ever wonder Why?
Get this out to as many people as you can.
The Informer.
The United States is still a British Colony
The
trouble with history is, we weren’t there when it took place.
Therefore, it can be changed to fit someone’s belief and/or traditions;
or, it can be taught in the public schools to favor a political agenda,
and withhold many facts. I know you have been taught that we won the
Revolutionary War and defeated the British, but I can prove to the
contrary. I want you to read this paper with an open mind, and allow
yourself to be instructed with the following verifiable facts. You be
the judge. Don’t let prior conclusions on your part, or, incorrect
teaching, keep you from the truth.
I
too was always taught in school, and in studying our history books,
that our freedom came from the Declaration of Independence and was
secured by our winning the Revolutionary War. I’m going to discuss a few
documents that are included in the footnotes at the end of this paper.
The first document is the first Charter of Virginia in 1606 (Footnote 1).
In the first paragraph, the king of England granted our fore fathers
license to settle and colonize America. The definition for license is as
follows.
“In Government Regulation. Authority to do some act or carry on some trade or business, in its nature lawful but prohibited by statute, except with the permission of the civil authority or which would otherwise be unlawful.” Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1914.
Keep in mind those that came to America from England were British subjects. So you can better understand what I’m going to tell you, here are the definitions for subject and citizen.
“In monarchical governments, by subject is meant one who owes permanent allegiance to the monarch.” Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1914.
“Constitutional Law. One that owes allegiance to a sovereign and is governed by his laws. The natives of Great Britain are subjects of the British government. Men in free governments are subjects as well as citizens; as citizens they enjoy rights and franchises; as subjects they are bound to obey the laws. The term is little used, in this sense, in countries enjoying a republican form of government.” Swiss Nat. Ins. Co. v. Miller, 267 U.S. 42, 45 S. Ct. 213, 214, 69 L.Ed. 504. Blacks fifth Ed.
I chose to give the definition for subject first, so you could better understand what definition of citizen is really being used in American law. Below is the definition of citizen from Roman law.
“The term citizen was used in Rome to indicate the possession of private civil rights, including those accruing under the Roman family and inheritance law and the Roman contract and property law. All other subjects were peregrines. But in the beginning of the 3d century the distinction was abolished and all subjects were citizens; 1 sel. Essays in Anglo-Amer. L. H. 578.” Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1914.
The king was making a commercial venture when he sent his subjects to America, and used his money and resources to do so. I think you would admit the king had a lawful right to receive gain and prosper from his venture. In the Virginia Charter he declares his sovereignty over the land and his subjects and in paragraph 9 he declares the amount of gold, silver and copper he is to receive if any is found by his subjects. There could have just as easily been none, or his subjects could have been killed by the Indians. This is why this was a valid right of the king (Jure Coronae, “In right of the crown,” Black’s forth Ed.), the king expended his resources with the risk of total loss.
If you’ll notice in paragraph 9, the king declares that all his heirs and successors were to also receive the same amount of gold, silver and copper that he claimed with this Charter. The gold that remained in the colonies was also the kings. He provided the remainder as a benefit for his subjects, which amounted to further use of his capital. You will see in this paper that not only is this valid, but it is still in effect today.
If you will read the rest of the Virginia Charter you will see that the king declared the right and exercised the power to regulate every aspect of commerce in his new colony. A license had to be granted for travel connected with transfer of goods (commerce) right down to the furniture they sat on. A great deal of the king’s declared property was ceded to America in the Treaty of 1783. I want you to stay focused on the money and the commerce which was not ceded to America.
This brings us to the Declaration of Independence.
Our freedom was declared because the king did not fulfill his end of the covenant between king and subject. The main complaint was taxation without representation, which was reaffirmed in the early 1606 Charter granted by the king. It was not a revolt over being subject to the king of England, most wanted the protection and benefits provided by the king. Because of the kings refusal to hear their demands and grant relief, separation from England became the lesser of two evils. The cry of freedom and self determination became the rallying cry for the colonist. The slogan “Don’t Tread On Me” was the standard borne by the militias.
The Revolutionary War was fought and concluded when Cornwallis surrendered to Washington at Yorktown. As Americans we have been taught that we defeated the king and won our freedom. The next document I will use is the Treaty of 1783, which will totally contradict our having won the Revolutionary War. Footnote 2.
Esquire ??
I want you to notice in the first paragraph that the king refers to himself as ‘Prince of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United States’. You know from this that the United States did not negotiate this Treaty of peace in a position of strength and victory, but it is obvious that Benjamin Franklin, John Jay and John Adams negotiated a Treaty of further granted privileges from the king of England. Keep this in mind as you study these documents. You also need to understand the players of those that negotiated this Treaty. For the Americans it was Benjamin Franklin Esgr., a great patriot and standard bearer of freedom. Or was he? His title includes Esquire.
An Esquire in the above usage was a granted rank and Title of nobility by the king, which is below Knight and above a yeoman, common man. An Esquire is someone that does not do manual labor as signified by this status, see the below definitions:
Benjamin Franklin was the main negotiator for the terms of the Treaty, he spent most of the War traveling between England and France. The use of Esquire declared his and the others British subjection and loyalty to the crown.
In the first article of the Treaty most of the kings claims to America are relinquished, except for his claim to continue receiving gold, silver and copper as gain for his business venture. Article 3 gives Americans the right to fish the waters around the United States and its rivers. In article 4, the United States agreed to pay all bona fide debts. If you will read my other papers on money you will understand that the financiers were working with the king. Why else would he protect their interest with this Treaty?
I wonder if you have seen the main and obvious point? This Treaty was signed in 1783, the war was over in 1781. If the United States defeated England, how is the king granting rights to America, when we were now his equal in status? We supposedly defeated him in the Revolutionary War! So why would these supposed patriot Americans sign such a Treaty, when they knew that this would void any sovereignty gained by the Declaration of Independence and the Revolutionary War? If we had won the Revolutionary War, the king granting us our land would not be necessary, it would have been ours by his loss of the Revolutionary War.
To not dictate the terms of a peace treaty in a position of strength after winning a war; means the war was never won. Think of other wars we have won, such as when we defeated Japan. Did McArther allow Japan to dictate to him the terms for surrender? No way! All these men did is gain status and privilege granted by the king and insure the subjection of future unaware generations. Worst of all, they sold out those that gave their lives and property for the chance to be free.
When Cornwallis surrendered to Washington he surrendered the battle, not the war. Read the Article of Capitulation signed by Cornwallis at Yorktown. (Footnote 3)
Jonathan Williams recorded in his book, Legions of Satan, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington during his surrender that “a holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown.”….”in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire.”
All the Treaty did was remove the United States as a liability and obligation of the king. He no longer had to ship material and money to support his subjects and colonies. At the same time he retained financial subjection through debt owed after the Treaty, which is still being created today; millions of dollars a day. And his heirs and successors are still reaping the benefit of the kings original venture. If you will read the following quote from Title 26, you will see just one situation where the king is still collecting a tax from those that receive a benefit from him, on property which is purchased with the money the king supplies, at almost the same percentage:
AMENDMENTS
A new war was declared when the Treaty was signed. The king wanted his land back and he knew he would be able to regain his property for his heirs with the help of his world financiers. Here is a quote from the king speaking to Parliament after the Revolutionary War had concluded.
(Six weeks after) the capitulation of Yorktown, the king of Great Britain, in his speech to Parliament (Nov. 27, 1781), declared “That he should not answer the trust committed to the sovereign of a free people, if he consented to sacrifice either to his own desire of peace, or to their temporary ease and relief, those essential rights and permanent interests, upon the maintenance and preservation of which the future strength and security of the country must forever depend.” The determined language of this speech, pointing to the continuance of the American war, was echoed back by a majority of both Lords and Commons.
In a few days after (Dec. 12), it was moved in the House of Commons that a resolution should be adopted declaring it to be their opinion “That all farther attempts to reduce the Americans to obedience by force would be ineffectual, and injurious to the true interests of Great Britain.” The rest of the debate can be found in (Footnote 4). What were the true interests of the king? The gold, silver and copper.
The new war was to be fought without Americans being aware that a war was even being waged, it was to be fought by subterfuge and key personnel being placed in key positions. The first two parts of ‘A Country Defeated In Victory‘ go into detail about how this was done and exposes some of the main players.
Every time you pay a tax you are transferring your labor to the king, and his heirs and successors are still receiving interest from the original American Charters.
The following is the definition of tribute (tax).
The form that is supposed to be used for this is form 8288, FIRPTA – Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Account, you won’t find many people using this form, just the 1040 form. The 8288 form can be found in the Law Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. If you will check the OMB’s paper – Office of Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active Information Collections, Approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act, you will find this form under OMB number 1545-0902, which says U.S. withholding tax-return for dispositions by foreign persons of U.S. real property interests-statement of withholding on dispositions, by foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288 #8288a.
These codes have since been changed to read as follows; IMF 300-309, Barred Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reserved, the BMF 300-309 reads the same as IMF 300-309. BMF 390-399 reads U.S./U.K. Tax Treaty Claims. The long and short of it is nothing changed, the government just made it plainer, the 1040 is the payment of a foreign tax to the king/queen of England. We have been in financial servitude since the Treaty of 1783.
Another Treaty between England and the United States was Jay’s Treaty of 1794 (footnote 5). If you will remember from the Paris Treaty of 1783, John Jay Esqr. was one of the negotiators of the Treaty. In 1794 he negotiated another Treaty with Britain. There was great controversy among the American people about this Treaty.
In Article 2 you will see the king is still on land that was supposed to be ceded to the United States at the Paris Treaty. This is 13 years after America supposedly won the Revolutionary War. I guess someone forgot to tell the king of England. In Article 6, the king is still dictating terms to the United States concerning the collection of debt and damages, the British government and World Bankers claimed we owe. In Article 12 we find the king dictating terms again, this time concerning where and with who the United States could trade. In Article 18 the United States agrees to a wide variety of material that would be subject to confiscation if Britain found said material going to its enemies ports. Who won the Revolutionary War?
That’s right, we were conned by some of our early fore fathers into believing that we are free and sovereign people, when in fact we had the same status as before the Revolutionary War. I say had, because our status is far worse now than then. I’ll explain.
Early on in our history the king was satisfied with the interest made by the Bank of the United States. But when the Bank Charter was canceled in 1811 it was time to gain control of the government, in order to shape government policy and public policy. Have you never asked yourself why the British, after burning the White House and all our early records during the War of 1812, left and did not take over the government.
The reason they did, was to remove the greatest barrier to their plans for this country. That barrier was the newly adopted 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The purpose for this Amendment was to stop anyone from serving in the government who was receiving a Title of nobility or honor. It was and is obvious that these government employees would be loyal to the granter of the Title of nobility or honor.
The War of 1812 served several purposes. It delayed the passage of the 13th Amendment by Virginia, allowed the British to destroy the evidence of the first 12 states ratification of this Amendment, and it increased the national debt, which would coerce the Congress to reestablish the Bank Charter in 1816 after the Treaty of Ghent was ratified by the Senate in 1815.
Forgotten Amendment
The Articles of Confederation, Article VI states: “nor shall the united States in Congress assembled, or any of them, grant any Title of nobility.” The Constitution for the united States, in Article, I Section 9, clause 8 states: “No Title of nobility shall be granted by the united States; and no Person holding any Office or Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”
Also, Section 10, clause 1 states, “No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque or Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but Gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto of Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of nobility.”
There was however, no measurable penalty for violation of the above Sections. Congress saw this as a great threat to the freedom of Americans, and our Republican form of government. In January 1810 Senator Reed proposed the Thirteenth Amendment, and on April 26, 1810 was passed by the Senate 26 to 1 (1st-2nd session, p. 670) and by the House 87 to 3 on May 1, 1810 (2nd session, p. 2050) and submitted to the seventeen states for ratification. The Amendment reads as follows:
“In Government Regulation. Authority to do some act or carry on some trade or business, in its nature lawful but prohibited by statute, except with the permission of the civil authority or which would otherwise be unlawful.” Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1914.
Keep in mind those that came to America from England were British subjects. So you can better understand what I’m going to tell you, here are the definitions for subject and citizen.
“In monarchical governments, by subject is meant one who owes permanent allegiance to the monarch.” Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1914.
“Constitutional Law. One that owes allegiance to a sovereign and is governed by his laws. The natives of Great Britain are subjects of the British government. Men in free governments are subjects as well as citizens; as citizens they enjoy rights and franchises; as subjects they are bound to obey the laws. The term is little used, in this sense, in countries enjoying a republican form of government.” Swiss Nat. Ins. Co. v. Miller, 267 U.S. 42, 45 S. Ct. 213, 214, 69 L.Ed. 504. Blacks fifth Ed.
I chose to give the definition for subject first, so you could better understand what definition of citizen is really being used in American law. Below is the definition of citizen from Roman law.
“The term citizen was used in Rome to indicate the possession of private civil rights, including those accruing under the Roman family and inheritance law and the Roman contract and property law. All other subjects were peregrines. But in the beginning of the 3d century the distinction was abolished and all subjects were citizens; 1 sel. Essays in Anglo-Amer. L. H. 578.” Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1914.
The king was making a commercial venture when he sent his subjects to America, and used his money and resources to do so. I think you would admit the king had a lawful right to receive gain and prosper from his venture. In the Virginia Charter he declares his sovereignty over the land and his subjects and in paragraph 9 he declares the amount of gold, silver and copper he is to receive if any is found by his subjects. There could have just as easily been none, or his subjects could have been killed by the Indians. This is why this was a valid right of the king (Jure Coronae, “In right of the crown,” Black’s forth Ed.), the king expended his resources with the risk of total loss.
If you’ll notice in paragraph 9, the king declares that all his heirs and successors were to also receive the same amount of gold, silver and copper that he claimed with this Charter. The gold that remained in the colonies was also the kings. He provided the remainder as a benefit for his subjects, which amounted to further use of his capital. You will see in this paper that not only is this valid, but it is still in effect today.
If you will read the rest of the Virginia Charter you will see that the king declared the right and exercised the power to regulate every aspect of commerce in his new colony. A license had to be granted for travel connected with transfer of goods (commerce) right down to the furniture they sat on. A great deal of the king’s declared property was ceded to America in the Treaty of 1783. I want you to stay focused on the money and the commerce which was not ceded to America.
This brings us to the Declaration of Independence.
Our freedom was declared because the king did not fulfill his end of the covenant between king and subject. The main complaint was taxation without representation, which was reaffirmed in the early 1606 Charter granted by the king. It was not a revolt over being subject to the king of England, most wanted the protection and benefits provided by the king. Because of the kings refusal to hear their demands and grant relief, separation from England became the lesser of two evils. The cry of freedom and self determination became the rallying cry for the colonist. The slogan “Don’t Tread On Me” was the standard borne by the militias.
The Revolutionary War was fought and concluded when Cornwallis surrendered to Washington at Yorktown. As Americans we have been taught that we defeated the king and won our freedom. The next document I will use is the Treaty of 1783, which will totally contradict our having won the Revolutionary War. Footnote 2.
Esquire ??
I want you to notice in the first paragraph that the king refers to himself as ‘Prince of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United States’. You know from this that the United States did not negotiate this Treaty of peace in a position of strength and victory, but it is obvious that Benjamin Franklin, John Jay and John Adams negotiated a Treaty of further granted privileges from the king of England. Keep this in mind as you study these documents. You also need to understand the players of those that negotiated this Treaty. For the Americans it was Benjamin Franklin Esgr., a great patriot and standard bearer of freedom. Or was he? His title includes Esquire.
An Esquire in the above usage was a granted rank and Title of nobility by the king, which is below Knight and above a yeoman, common man. An Esquire is someone that does not do manual labor as signified by this status, see the below definitions:
“Esquires
by virtue of their offices; as justices of the peace, and others who
bear any office of trust under the crown….for whosever studieth the laws
of the realm, who studieth in the universities, who professeth the
liberal sciences, and who can live idly, and without manual labor, and
will bear the port, charge, and countenance of a gentleman, he shall be
called master, and shall be taken for a gentleman.” Blackstone
Commentaries p. 561-562
“Esquire
– In English Law. A title of dignity next above gentleman, and below
knight. Also a title of office given to sheriffs, serjeants, and
barristers at law, justices of the peace, and others.” Blacks Law
Dictionary fourth ed. p. 641
Benjamin
Franklin, John Adams and John Jay, as you can read in the Treaty, were
all Esquires and were the signers of this Treaty and the only
negotiators of the Treaty. The representative of the king was David
Hartley Esqr..Benjamin Franklin was the main negotiator for the terms of the Treaty, he spent most of the War traveling between England and France. The use of Esquire declared his and the others British subjection and loyalty to the crown.
In the first article of the Treaty most of the kings claims to America are relinquished, except for his claim to continue receiving gold, silver and copper as gain for his business venture. Article 3 gives Americans the right to fish the waters around the United States and its rivers. In article 4, the United States agreed to pay all bona fide debts. If you will read my other papers on money you will understand that the financiers were working with the king. Why else would he protect their interest with this Treaty?
I wonder if you have seen the main and obvious point? This Treaty was signed in 1783, the war was over in 1781. If the United States defeated England, how is the king granting rights to America, when we were now his equal in status? We supposedly defeated him in the Revolutionary War! So why would these supposed patriot Americans sign such a Treaty, when they knew that this would void any sovereignty gained by the Declaration of Independence and the Revolutionary War? If we had won the Revolutionary War, the king granting us our land would not be necessary, it would have been ours by his loss of the Revolutionary War.
To not dictate the terms of a peace treaty in a position of strength after winning a war; means the war was never won. Think of other wars we have won, such as when we defeated Japan. Did McArther allow Japan to dictate to him the terms for surrender? No way! All these men did is gain status and privilege granted by the king and insure the subjection of future unaware generations. Worst of all, they sold out those that gave their lives and property for the chance to be free.
When Cornwallis surrendered to Washington he surrendered the battle, not the war. Read the Article of Capitulation signed by Cornwallis at Yorktown. (Footnote 3)
Jonathan Williams recorded in his book, Legions of Satan, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington during his surrender that “a holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown.”….”in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire.”
All the Treaty did was remove the United States as a liability and obligation of the king. He no longer had to ship material and money to support his subjects and colonies. At the same time he retained financial subjection through debt owed after the Treaty, which is still being created today; millions of dollars a day. And his heirs and successors are still reaping the benefit of the kings original venture. If you will read the following quote from Title 26, you will see just one situation where the king is still collecting a tax from those that receive a benefit from him, on property which is purchased with the money the king supplies, at almost the same percentage:
-CITE-
26 USC Sec. 1491
HEAD-
Sec. 1491. Imposition of tax
-STATUTE-
(1)the fair market value of the property so transferred, over
(2)the sum of –
(2)the sum of –
(A)the adjusted basis (for determining gain) of such property in the hands of the transferor, plus
(B)the amount of the gain recognized to the transferor at the time of the transfer.
(B)the amount of the gain recognized to the transferor at the time of the transfer.
-SOURCE-
Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 365; Oct. 4, 1976,
Pub. L. 94-455, title X, Sec. 1015(a), 90 Stat. 1617; Nov. 6, 1978,
Pub. L. 95-600, title VII, Sec. 701(u)(14)(A), 92 Stat. 2919.)
Pub. L. 94-455, title X, Sec. 1015(a), 90 Stat. 1617; Nov. 6, 1978,
Pub. L. 95-600, title VII, Sec. 701(u)(14)(A), 92 Stat. 2919.)
-MISC1-
AMENDMENTS
1978 – Pub. L. 95-600 substituted ‘estate or trust’ for ‘trust’ wherever appearing.
1976 – Pub. L. 94-455 substituted in provisions preceding par.
(1) ‘property’ for ‘stocks and securities’ and ’35 percent’ for ’27 1/2 percent’ and in par.
(1) ‘fair market value’ for ‘value’ and ‘property’ for ‘stocks and securities’ and in par.
(2) designated existing provisions as subpar. (A) and added subpar. (B).
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1978 AMENDMENT
Section
701(u)(14)(C) of Pub. L. 95-600 provided that: ‘The amendments made by
this paragraph (amending this section and section 1492 of this title)
shall apply to transfers after October 2, 1975.’
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1976 AMENDMENT
Section
1015(d) of Pub. L. 94-455 provided that: ‘The amendments made by this
section (enacting section 1057 of this title, amending this section and
section 1492 of this title, and renumbering former section 1057 as 1058
of this title) shall apply to transfers of property after October 2,
1975.’
A New War Declared Upon AmericaA new war was declared when the Treaty was signed. The king wanted his land back and he knew he would be able to regain his property for his heirs with the help of his world financiers. Here is a quote from the king speaking to Parliament after the Revolutionary War had concluded.
(Six weeks after) the capitulation of Yorktown, the king of Great Britain, in his speech to Parliament (Nov. 27, 1781), declared “That he should not answer the trust committed to the sovereign of a free people, if he consented to sacrifice either to his own desire of peace, or to their temporary ease and relief, those essential rights and permanent interests, upon the maintenance and preservation of which the future strength and security of the country must forever depend.” The determined language of this speech, pointing to the continuance of the American war, was echoed back by a majority of both Lords and Commons.
In a few days after (Dec. 12), it was moved in the House of Commons that a resolution should be adopted declaring it to be their opinion “That all farther attempts to reduce the Americans to obedience by force would be ineffectual, and injurious to the true interests of Great Britain.” The rest of the debate can be found in (Footnote 4). What were the true interests of the king? The gold, silver and copper.
The new war was to be fought without Americans being aware that a war was even being waged, it was to be fought by subterfuge and key personnel being placed in key positions. The first two parts of ‘A Country Defeated In Victory‘ go into detail about how this was done and exposes some of the main players.
Every time you pay a tax you are transferring your labor to the king, and his heirs and successors are still receiving interest from the original American Charters.
The following is the definition of tribute (tax).
“A contribution which is raised by a prince or sovereign from his subjects to sustain the expenses of the state.
A
sum of money paid by an inferior sovereign or state to a superior
potentate, to secure the friendship or protection of the latter.” Blacks
Law Dictionary forth ed. p. 1677.
As
further evidence, not that any is needed, a percentage of taxes that
are paid are to enrich the king/queen of England. For those that study
Title 26 you will recognize IMF, which means Individual Master File, all
tax payers have one. To read one you have to be able to break their
codes using file 6209, which is about 467 pages. On your IMF you will
find a blocking series, which tells you what type of tax you are paying.
You will probably find a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 says is
reserved. You then look up the BMF 300-399, which is the Business Master
File in 6209. You would have seen prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax
Claims, non-refile DLN. Meaning everyone is considered a business and
involved in commerce and you are being held liable for a tax via a
treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K..The form that is supposed to be used for this is form 8288, FIRPTA – Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Account, you won’t find many people using this form, just the 1040 form. The 8288 form can be found in the Law Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. If you will check the OMB’s paper – Office of Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active Information Collections, Approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act, you will find this form under OMB number 1545-0902, which says U.S. withholding tax-return for dispositions by foreign persons of U.S. real property interests-statement of withholding on dispositions, by foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288 #8288a.
These codes have since been changed to read as follows; IMF 300-309, Barred Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reserved, the BMF 300-309 reads the same as IMF 300-309. BMF 390-399 reads U.S./U.K. Tax Treaty Claims. The long and short of it is nothing changed, the government just made it plainer, the 1040 is the payment of a foreign tax to the king/queen of England. We have been in financial servitude since the Treaty of 1783.
Another Treaty between England and the United States was Jay’s Treaty of 1794 (footnote 5). If you will remember from the Paris Treaty of 1783, John Jay Esqr. was one of the negotiators of the Treaty. In 1794 he negotiated another Treaty with Britain. There was great controversy among the American people about this Treaty.
In Article 2 you will see the king is still on land that was supposed to be ceded to the United States at the Paris Treaty. This is 13 years after America supposedly won the Revolutionary War. I guess someone forgot to tell the king of England. In Article 6, the king is still dictating terms to the United States concerning the collection of debt and damages, the British government and World Bankers claimed we owe. In Article 12 we find the king dictating terms again, this time concerning where and with who the United States could trade. In Article 18 the United States agrees to a wide variety of material that would be subject to confiscation if Britain found said material going to its enemies ports. Who won the Revolutionary War?
That’s right, we were conned by some of our early fore fathers into believing that we are free and sovereign people, when in fact we had the same status as before the Revolutionary War. I say had, because our status is far worse now than then. I’ll explain.
Early on in our history the king was satisfied with the interest made by the Bank of the United States. But when the Bank Charter was canceled in 1811 it was time to gain control of the government, in order to shape government policy and public policy. Have you never asked yourself why the British, after burning the White House and all our early records during the War of 1812, left and did not take over the government.
The reason they did, was to remove the greatest barrier to their plans for this country. That barrier was the newly adopted 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The purpose for this Amendment was to stop anyone from serving in the government who was receiving a Title of nobility or honor. It was and is obvious that these government employees would be loyal to the granter of the Title of nobility or honor.
The War of 1812 served several purposes. It delayed the passage of the 13th Amendment by Virginia, allowed the British to destroy the evidence of the first 12 states ratification of this Amendment, and it increased the national debt, which would coerce the Congress to reestablish the Bank Charter in 1816 after the Treaty of Ghent was ratified by the Senate in 1815.
Forgotten Amendment
The Articles of Confederation, Article VI states: “nor shall the united States in Congress assembled, or any of them, grant any Title of nobility.” The Constitution for the united States, in Article, I Section 9, clause 8 states: “No Title of nobility shall be granted by the united States; and no Person holding any Office or Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”
Also, Section 10, clause 1 states, “No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque or Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but Gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto of Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of nobility.”
There was however, no measurable penalty for violation of the above Sections. Congress saw this as a great threat to the freedom of Americans, and our Republican form of government. In January 1810 Senator Reed proposed the Thirteenth Amendment, and on April 26, 1810 was passed by the Senate 26 to 1 (1st-2nd session, p. 670) and by the House 87 to 3 on May 1, 1810 (2nd session, p. 2050) and submitted to the seventeen states for ratification. The Amendment reads as follows:
“If
any citizen of the United States shall Accept, claim, receive or retain
any title of nobility or honor, or shall, without the consent of
Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of
any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power,
such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall
be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or
either of them.”
From An “American Dictionary of the English Language, 1st Edition,” Noah Webster(1828), defines nobility as:
“3.
The qualities which constitute distinction of rank in civil society,
according to the customs or laws of the country; that eminence or
dignity which a man derives from birth or title conferred, and which
places him in an order above common men.”; and,
“4. The persons collectively who enjoy rank above commoners; the peerage.”
The
fore-mentioned Sections in the Constitution for the united States, and
the above proposed Thirteenth Amendment sought to prohibit the above
definition, which would give any advantage or privilege to some citizens
an unequal opportunity to achieve or exercise political power. Thirteen
of the seventeen states listed below understood the importance of this
Amendment.
Date Admitted to the Union
|
State
|
Date voted the Amendment
|
Date Voted Against the Amendment
|
1788
|
Maryland
|
Dec. 25, 1810
|
|
1792
|
Kentucky
|
Jan. 31, 1811
|
|
1803
|
Ohio
|
Jan. 31, 1811
|
|
1787
|
Delaware
|
Feb. 2, 1811
|
|
1787
|
Pennsylvania
|
Feb. 6, 1811
|
|
1787
|
New Jersey
|
Feb., 13, 1811
|
|
1791
|
Vermont
|
Oct. 24, 1811
|
|
1796
|
Tennessee
|
Nov. 21, 1811
|
|
1788
|
Georgia
|
Dec. 13, 1811
|
|
1789
|
North Carolina
|
Dec. 23, 1811
|
|
1788
|
Massachusetts
|
Feb. 27, 1812
|
|
1788
|
New Hampshire
|
Dec. 10, 1812
|
|
1788
|
Virginia
|
Mar. 12, 1819
|
|
1788
|
New York
|
Mar. 12, 1811
|
|
1788
|
Connecticut
|
May 1813
|
|
1788
|
South Carolina
|
Dec. 7, 1813
|
|
1790
|
Rhode Island
|
Setp. 15, 1814
|
“Be it enacted by the General Assembly, that there shall
be published an edition of the laws of this Commonwealth in which shall
be contained the following matters, that is to say: the Constitution of
the united States and the amendments thereto…”
The official day of ratification was March 12, 1819, this was the
date of re-publication of the Virginia Civil Code. Virginia ordered
4,000 copies, almost triple their usual order. Word of Virginia’s 1819
ratification spread throughout the states and both Rhode Island and
Kentucky published the new Amendment in 1822. Ohio published the new
Amendment in 1824. Maine ordered 10,000 copies of the Constitution with
the new Amendment to be printed for use in the public schools, and again
in 1831 for their Census Edition.Indiana published the new Amendment in the Indiana Revised Laws, of 1831 on P. 20. The Northwest Territories published the new Amendment in 1833; Ohio published the new Amendment again in 1831 and in 1833. Connecticut, one of the states that voted against the new Amendment published the new Amendment in 1835. Wisconsin Territory published the new Amendment in 1839; Iowa Territory published the new Amendment in 1843;
Ohio published the new Amendment again, in 1848; Kansas published the new Amendment in 1855; and Nebraska Territory published the new Amendment six years in a row from 1855 to 1860. Colorado Territory published the new Amendment in 1865 and again 1867, in the 1867 printing, the present Thirteenth Amendment (slavery Amendment) was listed as the Fourteenth Amendment. The repeated reprinting of the Amended united States Constitution is conclusive evidence of its passage.
Also, as evidence of the new Thirteenth Amendments impending passage; on December 2, 1817 John Quincy Adams, then Secretary of State, wrote to Buck (an attorney) regarding the position Buck had been assigned. The letter reads:
“…if it should be the opinion of this Government that the
acceptance on your part of the Commission under which it was granted
did not interfere with your citizenship.
It is the opinion of the Executive that under the 13th amendment
to the constitution by the acceptance of such an appointment from any
foreign Government, a citizen of the United States ceases to enjoy that
character, and becomes incapable of holding any office of trust or
profit under the United States or either of them… J.Q.A.
By virtue of these titles and honors, and special privileges,
lawyers have assumed political and economic advantages over the majority
of citizens. A majority may vote, but only a minority (lawyers) may run
for political office.After the War of 1812 was concluded the Treaty of Ghent was signed and ratified (footnote 6). In Article 4 of the Treaty, the United States gained what was already given in the Treaty of Paris 1783, namely islands off the U.S. Coast. Also, two men were to be given the power to decide the borders and disagreements, if they could not, the power was to be given to an outside sovereign power and their decision was final and considered conclusive.
In Article 9, it is admitted there are citizens and subjects in America. As you have seen, the two terms are interchangeable, synonymous. In Article 10 you will see where the idea for the overthrow of this country came from and on what issue. The issue raised by England was slavery and it was nurtured by the king’s emissaries behind the scenes. This would finally lead to the Civil War, even though the Supreme Court had declared the states and their citizens property rights could not be infringed on by the United States government or Congress.
This was further declared by the following Presidential quotes, where they declared to violate the states rights would violate the U.S. Constitution. Also, history shows that slavery would not have existed much longer in the Southern states, public sentiment was changing and slavery was quickly disappearing. The Civil War was about destroying property rights and the U.S. Constitution which supported these rights. Read the following quotes of Presidents just before the Civil War:
“I believe that involuntary servitude, as it exists in
different States of this Confederacy, is recognized by the Constitution.
I believe that it stands like any other admitted right, and that the
States were it exists are entitled to efficient remedies to enforce the
constitutional provisions.” Franklin Pierce Inaugural Address, March 4,
1853 – Messages and Papers of the Presidents, vol. 5.
“The whole Territorial question being thus settled upon the
principle of popular sovereignty-a principle as ancient as free
government itself – everything of a practical nature has been decided.
No other question remains for adjustment, because all agree that under
the Constitution slavery in the States is beyond the reach of any human
power except that of the respective States themselves wherein it
exists.” James Buchanan Inaugural Address, March 4th, 1857 – Messages
and Papers of the Presidents, vol. 5.
“I cordially congratulate you upon the final settlement by the Supreme Court of the United States of the question of slavery in the Territories, which had presented an aspect so truly formidable at the commencement of my Administration. The right has been established of every citizen to take his property of any kind, including slaves, into the common Territories belonging equally to all the States of the Confederacy, and to have it protected there under the Federal Constitution.
Neither Congress nor a Territorial legislature nor any human power has any authority to annul or impair this vested right. The supreme judicial tribunal of the country, which is a coordinate branch of the Government, has sanctioned and affirmed these principles of constitutional law, so manifestly just in themselves and so well calculated to promote peace and harmony among the States.” James Buchanan, Third Annual Message, December 19, 1859 – Messages and Papers of the Presidents, vol. 5.
So there is no misunderstanding, I am not rearguing slavery.
Slavery is morally wrong and contrary to God Almighty’s Law. In this
divisive issue, the true attack was on our natural rights and on the
Constitution. The core of the attack was on our right to possess
allodial property. Our God given right to own property in allodial was
taken away by conquest of the Civil War. If you are free, this right
cannot be taken away. The opposite of free is slave or subject,
we were allowed to believe we were free for about 70 years. Then the
king said enough, and had the slavery issue pushed to the front by the
northern press, which so formed northern public opinion, that they were
willing to send their sons to die in the Civil War.“I cordially congratulate you upon the final settlement by the Supreme Court of the United States of the question of slavery in the Territories, which had presented an aspect so truly formidable at the commencement of my Administration. The right has been established of every citizen to take his property of any kind, including slaves, into the common Territories belonging equally to all the States of the Confederacy, and to have it protected there under the Federal Constitution.
Neither Congress nor a Territorial legislature nor any human power has any authority to annul or impair this vested right. The supreme judicial tribunal of the country, which is a coordinate branch of the Government, has sanctioned and affirmed these principles of constitutional law, so manifestly just in themselves and so well calculated to promote peace and harmony among the States.” James Buchanan, Third Annual Message, December 19, 1859 – Messages and Papers of the Presidents, vol. 5.
The southern States were not fighting so much for the slave issue, but for the right to own property, any property. These property rights were granted by the king in the Treaty of 1783, knowing they would soon be forfeited by the American people through ignorance. Do you think you own your house? If you were to stop paying taxes, federal or state, you would soon find out that you were just being allowed to live and pay rent for this house. The rent being the taxes to the king, who supplied the benefit of commerce.
A free man not under a monarch, democracy, dictatorship or socialist government, but is under a republican form of government would not and could not have his property taken. Why! The king’s tax would not and could not be levied. If the Americans had been paying attention the first 70 years to the subterfuge and corruption of the Constitution and government representatives, instead of chasing the money supplied by the king, the Conquest of this country during the Civil War could have been avoided. George Washington had vision during the Revolutionary War, concerning the Civil War. You need to read it. (Footnote 7)
END PART ONE
Top of page
Proceed To PART TWO
THREE
FOUR
FIVE
SIX
Copyright acknowledgment: Presented as free information in public domain.
Format editing by: ELDON WARMAN
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
COMMON LAW Homepage
https://scannedretina.com/2014/11/17/suspicion-confirmed/
The Constitution Con (A Sad Tale of Parchment Idolatry) by Michael Tsarion
The
first function of the founders of nations, after the
founding itself, is to devise a set of true falsehoods about
origins - a mythology - that will make it desirable for
nationals to continue to live under common authority, and,
indeed, make it impossible for them to entertain
contrary thoughts - Forrest McDonald (E Pluribus Unum)
The US
Constitution was created on September 17, 1787, and ratified behind
closed doors on June 21, 1788. Thirty nine of the fifty five delegates
attending the Philadelphia Convention signed the document. Their con job
is evident from the very first line penned. Legally, the "People"
mentioned are not sovereign beings, but willing slaves who have been granted the illusion of freedom.
From an occult point of view the Constitution was ratified on an Atonist festival day. It is, therefore, a patently Solar Cult document. This is because the date of ratification - June 21st - is the day the sun ascends to its highest point in the zodiac.
From an occult point of view the Constitution was ratified on an Atonist festival day. It is, therefore, a patently Solar Cult document. This is because the date of ratification - June 21st - is the day the sun ascends to its highest point in the zodiac.
Washington presided
on a low rostrum in the Assembly Hall (where the Declaration of
Independence had been approved) from his “rising sun chair.” The top of
the chair showed half a sun with two eyes and a nose and thirteen rays
like hair. Above it on a stem hung a pyramid-shaped plant. The whole is a
Templar image. As the delegates sign the new Constitution, Benjamin
Franklin told them that the sun on Washington’s chair was rising, not
setting on the new union - Nicholas Hagger (The Secret History of the West)
|
Benjamin Franklin,
James Madison and Alexander Hamilton were three of the men who framed
the infernal Constitution and pushed for its ratification. Their
document served the American aristocracy, not the people. In fact the
document was never put before the people for ratification, and was
openly opposed by the majority of men and women in the original thirteen
states, who resisted coming together to form any kind of unified
nation. Facts of this sort have been deliberately concealed through the
decades, but are now openly accepted by some mainstream American
historians, such as Joseph Ellis, Thomas DiLorenzo, and others.
The Constitutionalists were guileful traitors whose attendance at the Philadelphia Convention was kept secret for an entire generation. Their document served to leave the "door" of America unlocked and ajar, so the country's foreign enemies could surreptitiously re-enter in the days and years following the supposed War of Independence.
The Constitutionalists were guileful traitors whose attendance at the Philadelphia Convention was kept secret for an entire generation. Their document served to leave the "door" of America unlocked and ajar, so the country's foreign enemies could surreptitiously re-enter in the days and years following the supposed War of Independence.
Benjamin Franklin, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton - architects of monarchy in disguise
The
hypocrisy and duplicity of the Federalists is
responsible for modern neo-imperialism and advent of the
so-called New World Order. In our opinion these men were
little more than British agents, because King George himself -
who declared eternal war on America - could not have done as much damage to America as their actions wrought.
Such
a tyrannical future where property rights would be ignored,
where a massive standing army would lurk
unchallengeable, where Congressmen would hold office for
life, where ruinous treaties would be commonplace, where
Presidential powers would make Nero jealous, where
gold and silver would vanish from circulation to be replaced
by the worthless "notes" of a private banking
conglomeration, where the States would be reduced to mere
administrative departments of the feds, and where the
grasp of taxation would actually reach into the common
laborer's paycheck - all this was too fantastic to be even
theoretically contemplated during the ratification
debates - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)
|
When
the duplicitous Hamilton was asked why he helped
draft the Constitution, he guardedly replied:
My motives must remain in the depository of my own breast.
He was but
one member of the Philadelphia Convention who secretly
resented the independence of America. One perceptive
dissenter realized this and wrote:
The
Continental convention...was composed of some men of
excellent characters; of others who were more
remarkable for their ambition and cunning, than their
patriotism; and of some who have been opponents to the
independence of the United States - (Dissenting Address of the Pennsylvanian Convention, 18 December 1787)
|
Hamilton was a member
of the traitorous Society of the Cincinnati, named after the Roman
dictator. This elitist order included George Washington as head and
Major General Henry Knox as secretary. Both men were card-carrying
Freemasons and Federalists. They and their cohorts planned to subvert
and destroy the American Republic, replacing it with an oligarchy.
...this Constitution was a strange
occurrence. Before that time, there was no such thing as a nation being
ruled by a constitution. Countries were ruled by kings who granted some
rights to the people. Yet governance by constitution had existed in
Masonic lodges for hundreds of years - Sanford Holst (Sworn in Secret: Freemasonry and the Knights Templar)
|
James
Madison is considered the "father" of the US Constitution. He
was heavily influenced, as were many American
politicians, by the philosophy of French aristocrat Baron de
Montesquieu who believed in monarchy. Madison was also
influenced by the writings of British empiricist
philosopher John Locke, himself "a major investor
in the English slave trade through the Royal Africa Company."
Madison was vehemently opposed to state independence and
pushed the Constitution to keep power out of the hands of ordinary
Americans. He openly advocated an anti-Republican
ideology and commented on how illiterate masses should be divided and
controlled:
Where a
majority are united by a common sentiment, and have an
opportunity, the rights of the minor party become
insecure. In a republican government the majority, if united,
have always an opportunity. The only remedy is to
enlarge the sphere and thereby divide the community into so
great a number of interests and parties that, in the first
place, a majority will not be likely, at the same
moment, to have a common interest separate from that of the
whole, or of the minority; and, in the second
place, that, in case they should have such an interest, they
may not be so apt to unite in the pursuit of it - (Elliot's Debates, Vol. 5)
|
Madison
was the only delegate to keep records of proceedings at the
Convention. However, his notes were not made public
until four years after his death. Prior to their public release the notes had been thoroughly edited.
The con is evident from the Constitution's Preamble, as we said. In fact the "People" referred to are not citizens of America, No! They are the elites who rule from within a legally separate precinct known as the District of Columbia. This district is under federal control and the government operating from within it is, legally speaking, a foreign institution. The term "We the People" denotes this separate ruling elite. It refers to the imperious overlords who have granted the Constitution to the masses within the "United States of America" - the non-sovereign nation under their control. Therefore, the entity mentioned in the first line of the Preamble is not the same entity mentioned in the last line. Let's read it again and uncover the cunning artifice of its authors:
The con is evident from the Constitution's Preamble, as we said. In fact the "People" referred to are not citizens of America, No! They are the elites who rule from within a legally separate precinct known as the District of Columbia. This district is under federal control and the government operating from within it is, legally speaking, a foreign institution. The term "We the People" denotes this separate ruling elite. It refers to the imperious overlords who have granted the Constitution to the masses within the "United States of America" - the non-sovereign nation under their control. Therefore, the entity mentioned in the first line of the Preamble is not the same entity mentioned in the last line. Let's read it again and uncover the cunning artifice of its authors:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more
perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic
Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the
general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to
ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish
this Constitution for the United States of America.
|
This is what the Preamble subtextually infers:
WE
THE RULING ARISTOCRACY, in Order to form a more perfect
Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility,
provide for the common defense, promote the general
Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and
our Posterity, do ordain and establish this
Constitution FOR THE SLAVES WITHOUT RIGHTS, UNDER OUR FEDERAL
CONTROL.
Because "People" is capitalized it is a proper noun referring to a specific body of people - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty) |
These
facts explain why the word "for" is found in the last
line, not the word "of." Legally, there is a big difference
between:
...do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
and:
...do ordain and establish this Constitution of the United States of America.
The first rendering implies the Constitution has been granted
to one body by another. Ergo the Constitution
is nothing more than a totalitarian document, ratifying
aristocratic control over the "United States of
America" and its inhabitants. The elites are
literally saying: "This document and its articles are for you." The point being that it is not of
you, meaning, it is not yours by natural
right. The word "for" indicates that the matter of the
document is bestowed or imposed
by others. And of course when a person gives someone
something, they presumably want something in
return. This was certainly the case for the cunning
Federalists who conceived the Constitution.
Suggestively, the word "of" does appear in a meaningful legal declaration. It appears in the text of the Presidential Oath:
Suggestively, the word "of" does appear in a meaningful legal declaration. It appears in the text of the Presidential Oath:
I solemnly
swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office
of President of the United States, and will to the
best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the
Constitution of the United States.
|
In
this instance, the word "of" designates the President as a
member of the aristocratic elite - denoted by the words
"United States." He is, therefore, a ruler separate from
the citizens in the various states. The "for" does not
apply to the President because, unlike the
masses, he is not an outsider. He is part of the
inner sovereign cadre referenced by the word "of." The
Constitution is "of" the ruling elite, but is "for" the
masses. In effect the Constitution is a
schizophrenic document. There are two
Constitutions; one for the serving masses, and one for the
served oligarchs ruling from within the legally sacrosanct
District of Columbia. This is why the Preamble contains two
different terms: the "United
States" (denoting the oligarchy and their authority), and
"United States of America" (denoting the
non-sovereign masses on the receiving end).
If the Presidential Oath read as follows, there would be less cause for concern:
If the Presidential Oath read as follows, there would be less cause for concern:
I
do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute
the Office of President of the United States of
America, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and
defend the Constitution of the United States of
America.
|
Then
again, pigs might fly. Alarmingly, before it was
dropped, the President's original title was "His
Excellency."
Many critics and authors have pointed out these disturbing facts and rightly insist that the so-called "United States" is not the same thing as the so-called "United States of America." Nevertheless, due to deliberate misinformation and conditioning, most people do believe the terms refer to one and the same entity. They are certainly not inclined to think of the "United States" (or U.S.) as a foreign corporation. Furthermore, the drafters of the Constitution intentionally saw to it that the term "United States" had more than one meaning. Specifically, they knew the term did not refer to citizens of a state. Once-upon-a-time an American could have been a citizen of a state without being a citizen of the nation. This political idiosyncrasy did not suit the Federalists who ingeniously manipulated the words and terms we are familiar with. It is a old trick that serves the cause of totalitarians everywhere.
Many critics and authors have pointed out these disturbing facts and rightly insist that the so-called "United States" is not the same thing as the so-called "United States of America." Nevertheless, due to deliberate misinformation and conditioning, most people do believe the terms refer to one and the same entity. They are certainly not inclined to think of the "United States" (or U.S.) as a foreign corporation. Furthermore, the drafters of the Constitution intentionally saw to it that the term "United States" had more than one meaning. Specifically, they knew the term did not refer to citizens of a state. Once-upon-a-time an American could have been a citizen of a state without being a citizen of the nation. This political idiosyncrasy did not suit the Federalists who ingeniously manipulated the words and terms we are familiar with. It is a old trick that serves the cause of totalitarians everywhere.
...not only
were the poly meanings of "United States" intentionally and
expressly used within the Constitution, but often
in ways as to actually invite confusion. For such brilliant
men to explain three jurisdictional concepts
would, on its face, pose a great mystery - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)
|
When
members of the police or military swear to serve, uphold and
protect the Constitution and "United States,"
they probably imagine their oath is sworn to the American
people. Nothing could be further from the truth. They
are in fact swearing to give their labor, and possibly
their lives, for the diabolical corporate executives
of Washington D.C.
Oaths of allegiance are fine, as long as you know
who or what your swearing them to.
who or what your swearing them to.
In short, the U.S.
and the U.S.A., are not the same entity. The
alleged "People" are not, therefore, free and sovereign
members of a country, as they would have been
under the Articles of Confederation drawn up
after the War of Independence. No, they were and
still are merely employees of a privately run
corporation. They do not have rights, they have
provisionally granted privileges. They have liberty, but
do not have permanent and inviolable sovereignty or
freedom.
The Constitution, as
currently interpreted, now resembles what the Founding Lawyers truly
desired in their aristocratic heart of hearts. Two centuries of history
have lifted the veil from that picture of Dorian Gray, leaving us with
the Hag of Hegemony - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)
The State...both in its genesis and by its primary intention, is purely anti-social. It is not based on the idea of natural rights, but on the idea that the individual has no rights except those that the State may provisionally grant him - Albert Jay Nock (Our Enemy: the State) |
Hologram of Liberty, by
K. W. Royce. Probably the best book dealing with the con of the Constitution. |
The
duplicity served to strengthen Federal power. Because of the
Constitution, the populace have been intentionally
stripped of their sovereign rights. It is also because of this
particular chicanery that Americans presently find
themselves politically and economically undermined. The Federalist plan
was nothing less than an act of war. It was the plan
of agent provocateurs and fifth columnists. Only a very few
authors have stated this in so many words. However,
we are convinced that the early Federalists were ministers of
the Crown. They accomplished with their pens what armed
legions failed to do by open war.
We believe that after the Constitution was ratified, Americans became, in effect, subjects of an American-based aristocracy. Their boss, King George, did not resend his physical army to attack with force of arms. He and his advisers knew that America could be conquered and brought under their control by more subtle means: |
The phrase "direct
and immediate allegiance" is something right out of feudal
law...Americans who became "U.S. citizens" have transposed themselves
from one system into another fundamentally different from the
first...Americans have unknowingly joined a modern feudal system in
which they must render a percentage of their toil to their federal
master - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)
The non-federal state Citizenship became virtually unknown as millions of state Americans were tricked out of their sovereignty and into federal citizenship - and thus into federal jurisdiction. Today, the states have been all but replaced by corporate, federal overlays...There's probably not enough left of the original states for Americans to resume state Citizenship - ibid |
These
facts show that the Constitution was not a
progressive document. On the contrary, its cunning drafters
concocted it knowing that it would help to usher in the
kind of Merchant State system that flourished earlier in
America, before the War of Independence, and shortly after the
first settlers arrived, with their British systems of law. As Albert Jay Nock explains:
The
fundamental fact to be observed in any survey of the American
State's initial development is the one whose
importance was first remarked, I believe, by Mr. Beard; that
the trading-company - the commercial corporation
for colonization - was actually an autonomous State. "Like
the State," says Mr. Beard, "it had a
constitution, a charter issued by the Crown...it had a
territorial basis, a grant of land often greater in area than
a score of European principalities...every
essential element long afterward found in the government
of the American State appeared in the chartered
corporation that started English civilization in America" - (Our Enemy: the State)
|
Nock
goes on to emphasize the connections between the
"Old World" system of control and so-called "New World"
system:
...the system of civil order established in America was the State-system of the "mother countries"...the
only thing that distinguished it was that the exploited and dependent class was situated at an unusual distance from the owning and exploiting class. The headquarters of the autonomous State were on one side of the Atlantic, and its subjects on the other. |
The elites
of Britain and Europe knew that remote control was only
feasible for a short time. They knew they had to have their
agents on site in order for the engines of
exploitation to work efficiently. Consequently, in 1628,
during the reign of Charles I, the oligarchs established the
Massachusetts Bay Company in America. Many of the
Constitution's most illustrious signers became wealthy from
their memberships of corporations such as the
Massachusetts Bay Company which overflowed with
agents of the British Crown. Business the American way is, it
seems, business the British way.
While it is not surprising that America's Founding Fathers were mostly slave owners, a legal activity,
it may be surprising to discover that they were often smugglers as well. Profits from drug running, smuggling, slave trading, and even piracy are directly responsible for the founding of several of the country's most important banks, which are still in operation today. New England's staunch insurance business was born and prospered through profits earned from insuring opium and slave ships. The large railroad system that was built throughout the continental United States in the nineteenth century was funded with profits from illegal drug smuggling. And one of the greatest opium fortunes would provide seed money for the telephone and communications industry - Steven Sora (Secret Societies of America's Elite) |
Left: The flag of the British East India Company. Right: The Flag of the "United States"
Corporation. Red, White and Blue are known as the Colors of the King. Does this
mean that the "States" are in fact "Estates" of the Crown?
Corporation. Red, White and Blue are known as the Colors of the King. Does this
mean that the "States" are in fact "Estates" of the Crown?
Of course
there were clever men who knew what was going on. Even before
the Constitution - the document of servitude - was signed and
ratified, the warnings went out:
That investigation into the nature and construction of the new constitution, which the conspirators
have so long and zealously struggled against, has, notwithstanding their partial success, so far taken place as to ascertain the enormity of their criminality. That system which was pompously displayed as the perfection of government, proves upon examination to be the most odious system of tyranny that was ever projected, a many headed hydra of despotism, whose complicated and various evils would be infinitely more oppressive and afflictive than the scourge of any tyrant - "Centinel" (Essay 12, 23 January 1788) |
The
Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union was America's true
constitution before it was unnecessarily derided and overruled by
cunning self-serving traitors desperate to create an American monarchy in disguise. Today these men would be referred to as Globalists or Internationalists.
|
The
anonymous author of this diatribe would not be in
the least surprised to see the present state of decay, and
neither would Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry, Thomas
Jefferson or Andrew Jackson. They would simply realize that
their worst fears were justified.
As we said, the rise of imperialism in America is the result of the "door" being deliberately left ajar, so to speak. The enemies of America were able to creep in whenever they chose. And creep in they did, confident the country would eventually fall into their unworthy hands. They knew their agents were ensconced within the country to misuse their positions of authority within government and big business to gradually undermine the Articles of Confederation that guaranteed each and every American the rights they deserved. They knew they simply had to continue employing the "divide and rule" tactic to further globalist interests. During his reign King George III adamantly proclaimed his utter hatred for the American rebels and American experiment. He openly declared "eternal" war on America, and his word was law to his many loyal and industrious lieutenants. True to form, agents of the British Crown have been waging eternal war on the country ever since the day of their lunatic master. |
The men who
undermined the Articles of the Confederation
and hustled the Constitution have had statues
and portraits raised in their honor. Volumes have been
written about their deeds, but rarely has the
truth been told, except in alternative circles. Throughout America and
the world the traitors are lauded as
great revolutionaries, reformers and humanitarians. Their
ideological descendants openly and unashamedly work hand
in hand with British and European oligarchs, using fear and
panic to further their agendas. They continue to erode
whatever is left of the privileges once bestowed upon their
slaves.
We have
"federal sheriffs" beyond imagination. There
are forty six civilian agencies of the
Federal Government whose agents carry guns and have
the power to make arrests. These "great insults on
the people" have been allowed because there
is little we can do about them, short of
armed rebellion. And by the way, no laws authorizing
"civil forfeiture" or other related measures of
tyranny have been struck down by the federal
courts - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)
We have plenty of rights in this country, provided you don't get caught exercising them - Terry Mitchell (Editor of The Revolutionary Toker) |
Patrick Henry was one
patriot who understood what was going on. He did not attend
the Convention in Philadelphia, and said: "I smell a
rat." He was dead right. But there was more than one stinking
human rat loose at the Convention. The
traitors referred to themselves as "Federalists" because they
knew the people would think of them as servants of
America. And they were right. Their smokescreen worked
wonderfully. Today the misuse of words and terms continues.
George Bush's "Patriot Acts" dupe the uninformed masses and give
them the impression it is patriotic to give up hard
won rights in turn for government protection.
For centuries,
pillage by invading armies was a normal part of warfare…Nowadays, at
least in more civilized countries, we do not let armies rampage for
booty. We leave the pillaging to men in suits,
and we don’t call it pillaging anymore. We call it economic development - Brian Whitaker (The Guardian) |
The Bushes
did as their predecessors had done two hundred years
ago. The Federalist traitors hurried the ratification process
along and gave the Convention delegates and American people
little time to scrutinize the Constitution's articles.
George W. Bush did likewise when it came to his scurrilous
Patriot Acts. Moreover, he personally saw to it that
the investigations into the causes of the September Eleventh
tragedy were hampered and limited:
President
Bush personally asked Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle…to
limit the Congressional investigation into the
events of September 11, Congressional and White House sources
told CNN…The request was made at a private
meeting with Congressional leaders - Gore Vidal (Dreaming War)
|
George
W. Bush's lack of regard for the Constitution is not unique. As a
Globalist he does not serve America or the interests of American people.
He is one of many men who have used the Constitution as a stepping
stone toward what might be described as an world super state. Nowadays
the conspirators who labor toward this utopian wet-dream appear to be
less inclined to conceal the reasons for their intrigue. As George W.
Bush himself put it:
It
is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter to
which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance - (Address to the UN General Assembly, February 1 1992)
The world can therefore seize the opportunity (the Persian Gulf crisis) to fulfill the long held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind - (State of the Union Address, January 29 1991) |
Author Forrest
MacDonald clarified the issue concerning the undermining of
the Articles of Confederation. In his book entitled Alexander Hamilton: A Biography, he wrote:
What did determine
the outcome were the rules of the contest, which Hamilton played an
important part in formulating. The convention decided to disregard the
amendment procedures prescribed in the Articles of Confederation and
instead provided that each state should hold a special election for
delegates to a ratifying convention...Had the rules of the Articles of
Confederation been adhered to, the Constitution would never have been
adopted.
|
The
dissenters knew what lay in store and were worried. Their warnings went
largely unheard and the ratification of the
Constitution hurriedly commenced regardless of the warnings of
perceptive critics:
It is insisted,
indeed, that this constitution must be received, be it ever so
imperfect. But remember, when the people once part with power, they can
seldom or never resume it again by by force. Many instances can be
produced in which the people have voluntarily increased the powers of
their rulers; but few, if any, in which rulers have willingly abridged
their authority - "Brutus" (Essay 1, 18 October 1787)
Consider what you are about to do before your part with this Government. Take longer time in reckoning things: Revolutions like this have happened in almost every country in Europe: Similar examples are...ancient Greece and ancient Rome: Instances of the people losing their liberty by their own carelessness and the ambition of a few - Patrick Henry (Speech of 5 June 1778) Does it not insult your judgment to tell you, Adopt first, and then amend?...Is your rage for novelty so great, that you are first to sign and seal, and then retract?...agree to bind yourself hand and foot - for the sake of what? of being unbound?...to go into a dungeon - for what? To get out? Is there no danger, when you go in, that the bolts of federal authority shall shut you in? - Patrick Henry (Speech to the Virginia ratifying assembly 1788) I look upon the Constitution as the most fatal plan that could possibly be conceived to enslave a free people - ibid |
No
sooner was the Constitution ratified than the
oligarchs began acting tyrannically toward the American
people. British agent President George Washington - who
presided over the signing of the Constitution and who was a
member of the Ohio Company of Virginia, the Mississippi
Company, and the Potomac Company - sent thirteen thousand
armed troops to violently stamp out the so-called Whiskey
Rebellion of 1794. This rebellion was against heavy
taxation.
The victims of government oppression soon discovered they could not use the Constitution to receive justice. It contained little provision for the underclasses. It gave complete suzerainty to the courts and judges, not to the people or states. To all intents and purposes it was as if the War of Independence had never been fought.
The Constitution merely made it possible for agents of the British Crown to operate as if they served the citizens of America. In this regard, nothing has changed.
The victims of government oppression soon discovered they could not use the Constitution to receive justice. It contained little provision for the underclasses. It gave complete suzerainty to the courts and judges, not to the people or states. To all intents and purposes it was as if the War of Independence had never been fought.
The Constitution merely made it possible for agents of the British Crown to operate as if they served the citizens of America. In this regard, nothing has changed.
The facts
about the American Revolution show that in the early days, in
the mid 1770's, the colonialists suffered a
series of defeats. Strategic secrets were being passed to the
British. The facts also show that an American army
general, Benedict Arnold, was a traitor who plotted to
surrender the fort at West Point to the British and turn the
tide of war against his own side. The facts link
Washington with Arnold when it comes to Freemasonry and the
facts show that the day the plot was discovered,
Washington was due to meet Arnold at West Point...Washington
has been working with Arnold and passing secrets
to the British - Robert Cooper (Interview on Dan Brown's The Lost Symbol)
|
The
tyranny continued in 1798 with the Alien and Sedition Acts. These Acts
made criticism of federal officials a punishable offense. The
Constitution served to strengthen the powers of the wealthy aristocratic
class in America. It possessed few benefits for the average citizen and
ultimately legalized widespread acts of confiscation and extortion. As
Thomas Jefferson once remarked: "The natural progress of things is for
liberty to yield and government to gain ground." The point is emphasized
by Constitutional scholar and author Kenneth W. Royce:
If analyzed in contrast to history since 1787, it appears that the Constitution was purposely laden
with several components designed to nearly guarantee the gradual expansion of the Federal Government - at the expense of the States and the people - (Hologram of Liberty) |
The Founding Fathers
may have referred to themselves as
Federalists. But this was, as we said, yet one
more cunning play on words. Master propagandists such as
Vladimir Lenin probably learned tactics from America's
faux Federalists.
Patrick
Henry is known for his "Give me Liberty or give me
Death!" speech. Along with Samuel Adams and Thomas
Paine, he is remembered as one of the most
influential and radical advocates of the American
Revolution and of Republicanism, especially in his
denunciations of corruption of government
officials - (Wikipedia Online Encyclopedia)
|
The original
Federalists demanded a government of limited
powers and were for State power. Their needs
were ably met by the Articles of Confederation
ratified in 1781. After the War of Independence
(1775 to 1783), Americans had the Constitution
forced upon them. Ever since then Americans have been
duped about the prestige of the document. The
people and representatives of the original thirteen
states were not allowed enough time to decide whether
the document was sound or not. Patrick Henry
questioned the haste and warned of the
consequences of accepting the Constitution
without due consideration and debate. He knew that State
representatives needed at least a year to mull
over the articles of the Constitution. He spoke
out and said:
As we said, the
Constitution's articles scandalously allowed the Supreme Court
to possess almost unlimited legal powers:
|
Despite widespread
resistance and a spirit of animosity toward the Constitution's
articles, its cheerleaders Madison, Hamilton,
Franklin and Washington relentlessly pressed on.
They ensured that resistance to their will was summarily
suppressed.
Most troublesome to
the framers of the Constitution was the increasing insurgent spirit
evidenced among the people. Fearing the popular takeover of state
governments, the wealthy class looked to a national government as a
means of protecting their interests. Even in states where they were
inclined to avoid strong federation, the rich, once faced with the
threat of popular rule and realizing that a political alliance with
conservatives from other states would be a safeguard if the radicals
could capture the state government...gave up 'state rights' for
'nationalism' without hesitation - Michael Parenti (Democracy for the Few)
Within a month after the 17 September signing, a torrent of anti-constitution essays appeared in the newspapers, pleasing for prudent wisdom. This horrified three particular federalists, who quickly went on the editorial offensive in what was to be a staggering 85 essays totaling some 175,000 words. The Federalist Papers were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay to defend the proposed Constitution...Hamilton, Madison, and Jay hid for years behind the pseudonym "Publius"...to conceal from the public their true identities, and Convention attendance - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty) |
George
Washington addressing the delegates during the signing of
the US Constitution. Benjamin Franklin (a
member of the English Hell Fire Club) is shown in the
center of the canvas. His design for the Seal
of the United States depicted Moses leading the
Children of Israel across the Red Sea. Franklin's
nickname among his elite secret society chums
was "Moses." Like his many Masonic associates in America,
England and France, he was an Atonist or in
conventional parlance a Luciferian. His backers
were powerful royal figures such as Charles de
Lorraine and the Duke d'Orleans. The last thing on his
mind was freedom for the American people. He was a
wealthy speculator in land, and a member of the Vandalia Company,
whose land grant happened (coincidentally of
course) to have been awarded by the British Crown.
|
The
secretiveness of the proceedings at the Convention reinforced
the suspicions of many critics of the Constitution. Kenneth W.
Royce tell us:
Little
wonder why the Constitution operated under such extraordinary
secrecy. Held on the second floor, windows shut, with
sentries posted below, the delegates were sworn to strict
silence. Not until 32 years later (a generation, you see) were
the proceeding's Journals published. Madison's
notes (thoroughly edited) weren't published until 53 years
later, in 1840.
|
Royce also
comments on the measures taken by the Federalists to conceal
the infighting that took place among delegates at the
Convention:
Great propaganda measures were employed to conceal the Convention's true atmosphere of acrimonious dissent.
|
The state of affairs was noted by a journalist, who wrote:
So
great is the unanimity, we hear, that prevails in the
Convention, upon all great federal subjects, that it has been
proposed to call the room in which they assemble -
Unanimity Hall - (Pennsylvania Packet and Daily Advertiser, 19 July 1787)
|
Fifty five delegates
attended the Philadelphia Convention - forty one
politicians and thirty four lawyers. Not a single person from
the working class was present. Those men who attempted to
delay proceedings by boycotting the Convention were sought out
by troops and forcibly dragged to the Convention hall.
Electing the
respected General George Washington as Convention president, with the
added presence of Benjamin Franklin, was responsible for much of the
public's "false confidences." Of the 55 delegates, 41 were politicians
and 34 were lawyers...According to delegate James McHenry, at least 21
of the 55 delegates favored some form of monarchy - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)
…in 1782 (Washington) received a letter from Colonel Lewis Nicola urging him to use the army to make himself King. He rejected the proposal with great indignation. Washington, it seems felt that America would eventually become a monarchy; indeed, he admitted the necessity of the principle of monarchy. But it seems he could not reconcile this view with his Templar philosophy, which demanded a republic - Nicholas Hagger (The Secret History of the West) |
Prime mover in the conspiracy to undermine the Articles of Confederation was the traitor Alexander Hamilton. In The Federalist Papers, Douglas Adair comments on Hamilton's dilemma:
Hamilton's
disillusion with the workings of the Confederation and his fear
of democracy, especially after Shay's Rebellion, had convinced
him that it would be almost impossible to set up a
stable republic in a country as large as the United States. As
he informed the Convention, any society in which political
power was vested in the hands of all the people would be
continually torn by the class struggles of the rich and
poor. Hamilton's remedy for this class war the Hobbesian
expedient of setting up a leviathan state to impose order upon
the American People from above, Hamilton was sure that
the only alternative to social anarchy was the establishment
of a consolidated government capable of maintaining itself
independently of the people's will.
|
Hamilton's
tactics worked. He knew the mindset of the men he represented.
He knew all he had to do was instill enough fear into the
delegates to achieve the desired result. Federalists and
Globalists continue to employ this ruse to further
agendas. It is little more than conflict control.
That was the genius
of the Constitution: To 1. utterly transform political reality without
the people understanding it; 2. destroy the States without sound or
smoke and 3. foist a government destined to become, over the distant
horizon, fully national in scope and authority. By the time the States
and the people would realize they'd been trumped, it would be too late - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)
|
Hamilton, Madison and
their Federalist gang of conspirators were ecstatic over the success of
their "divide and rule" tactics. After the damage was done Madison
bragged about the debacle he had deliberately helped foment:
One anti-federalist
opinion tell us that the proposed constitution ought to be rejected
because it is not a confederation of the States, but a government over
individuals. Another admits that it ought to be a government over
individuals to a certain extent but by no means to extent proposed. A
third does not object to a government over individuals but to the want
of a bill of rights. A fourth concurs in the absolute necessity of a
bill of rights but contends that it ought to be declaratory, not for the
personal rights of individuals, but of the rights reserved to the
States in their political capacity. A fifth is of the opinion that a
bill of rights of any sort would be superfluous and misplaced and that
the plan would be unexceptional except for the fatal power of regulating
the times and place of elections.
|
Thomas
Jefferson (principle author of the Declaration of Independence)
was appalled at the liberties taken by Hamilton and those he
continued taking in the years following the Constitution's
ratification. He noticed Hamilton was contemptuous of the
Constitution he himself cheerled, and as ambitiously attempting to
obtain broader powers for central government. Hamilton soon
proposed changes well outside the scope of the
Constitution's precepts. Obviously, the Constitution was merely
one means to many ends for Hamilton and his self-serving
aristocratic cronies. Incensed by Hamilton's scheming Jefferson
wrote:
I
will not suffer...the slanders of Hamilton whose history, from
the moment at which history can stoop to notice him, is a
tissue of machinations against the liberty of the country which
has not only received and given him bread, but heaped
honors on his head - (Jefferson to Washington, 1792)
|
Eventually
even Hamilton's colleague James Madison began to chafe at his
obvious disdain for the people and Constitutional provisos:
As
Madison watched Hamilton's program develop, he became
disillusioned and bitter. In the Convention he had fought to
create a Constitution under which 'the interests and
rights of every class of citizen should be duly represented and
understood.' Now he saw the machinery of his new government
being used to exploit the mass of the people in the interest
of a small minority - Douglas Adair (The Federalist Papers)
|
Among
Hamilton's most insidious programs was the creation of the first
private bank. He pushed for the establishment of this
scurrilously extortionist organization. His co-conspirator,
arch-traitor Robert Morris, was undoubtedly an agent of European
aristocracy.
Financial
genius Robert Morris organized the first bank. He and his
associates believed that the bank should be modeled
after the Bank of England…Secret investors put up $400,000 to
start this bank. This attempt failed after two short
years…Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton, submitted
a proposal to Congress in 1790 for a central bank.
Interestingly enough, Hamilton had been an aide of Robert
Morris in the initial experience of central banking in
North America - Bill Hughes (The Secret Terrorists)
|
Arch-traitor
Aaron Burr. Relatively unknown to most Americans, Burr was a
prime mover within the cabal that worked to undermine American
sovereignty. This truly insidious character's plotting is
revealed in Anton Chaitkin's masterly work Treason in America.
|
Norman
Dodd, Research Director of the 1950s Reese
Commission - which investigated America's tax-exempt foundations
- finally uncovered the dirt on Morris:
Robert Morris
(signer of the Declaration of Independence) was the personality in this
country who used his fortune to finance the Continental army and at the
end of the revolution, Mr. Morris found himself diluted of his fortune.
So after the revolution was over he then turned his attention to, as an
individual, of rebuilding a fortune and his area of activity was in land
speculation. At that time he was contacted by an agent of wealth lodged
abroad and this wealth was represented by an entity which is
historically referred to as the “House of Orange.” However, we did know
the agent of the House of Orange who contacted Robert Morris after he
began to rebuild his fortune, and that personality was a man by the name
of Haym Saloman, and he was an agent of the House of Orange in this
country, and it was through him that Mr. Morris was offered considerable
financial accommodation, which would enable him to, working capital,
you might say, to rebuild his fortune.
|
Haym Soloman was, of
course, a servant of the Jewish Kahal and Jesuit Order.
Like the Rothschilds who rose to power shortly after his time,
Solomon was a lackey of European royalty - the
Hanoverians, Hapsburgs, Stuarts, and related houses. King
George III (America's arch-enemy) was a senior member of the
Dutch House of Orange or Hanover.
The
royals maintain control over their disposable lieutenants by way of
Masonic societies such as the Skull and Bones and Bohemian Club. The
double-headed eagle (emblem of Scottish Rite Masonry) is identical to the royal arms of European dynasties such as the Hapsburgs.
|
These royal dynasties
own corporations and businesses all over the world and
have the power and skill to purchase and use men as easily as they do
companies. Of course they do not openly display their
colors. They are discreet and prefer to exercise control by way
of devious but disposable agents, faceless companies and
shadowy banking houses. One of the most important
aristocratically controlled engines is the Société
Générale de Belgique (Society General of Belgium). From
1840 to 1870 (before the Rothschilds were handed the
wheel), this financial consortium was directly controlled by
Belgium's King Leopold II, grandson of Queen Victoria and member
of the powerful Saxe-Coburg-Gotha dynasty. The Society
was founded in 1822, by none other than King William I
of the House of Orange. America's number one enemy, King George
III, was of the same royal line as William I. Their ancestor,
Duchess Sophia of Hanover was heir to the English throne.
Her son became George I of Great Britain. His grandson was
infamous King George III. These monarchs were members of the
so-called "Black Nobility" of Venice and Holland. By way of
their financial consortiums they and their relatives maintained
control remotely over colonies that included America.
|
The corporate name
that is assigned to that entity, as the 18th turned into the 19th
century, is called Societie Genearale de Belgique, which is the largest
accumulation of privately controlled tangible
wealth in the world - Andrew Power (Ireland: Land of the Pharaohs) William of Orange it was...who established the original SGDB which was to finance the growth of a great part of Belgian industry and which today remains by far the most important single force in the country’s economic life. La Generale list the Belgian royal family as well as the Vatican among its shareholders in addition to that all-powerful family alliance behind Belgian finances – the Solvays, the Boels and the Janssens…In 1838 the rival Banque de Belgique succumbed to the general crisis in Europe and closed its doors but the SGDB, supported by the Rothschilds, remained open, paying out coin against the notes issued by its competitor - ibid Prince Bernhard is known to be an influential member of the SGDB, a mysterious organization that seems to be an association of large corporate interests from many countries. American firms associated with this society are said to be among the large corporations whose officers are members of the Council on Foreign Relations and related organizations - Dan Smoot (The Invisible Government) |
Because of the
intervention of men such as Thomas Jefferson and Andrew
Jackson, the Federalist program to socially and economically
undermine America temporarily failed. But time was on the
side of the conspiring Nationalists. The second Federal Bank was
established six years later, in 1816. President Monroe
appointed Jesuit agent Nicholas Biddle as its first president.
Nicholas Biddle,
another one of their agents, carried out phase two of the Jesuit attack.
Biddle was a brilliant financier, having graduated from the University
of Pennsylvania at the age of thirteen. He was
a master of the science of money. By the time that Jackson had come to the Presidency in 1828, Biddle was in full control of the Federal government’s central bank. This was not the first time that a central bank had been established. Twice before, first under Robert Morris, and then under Alexander Hamilton, had a central bank been tried, but in both cases it had failed because of fraudulent actions on the part of the bankers who were in control. After the war of 1812, a central bank was tried again, and it was in this third attempt that we find Mr. Biddle - Bill Hughes (The Secret Terrorists) |
The
scandalous intrigue of affluent, influential Jewish financier
families, such as Rothschild, Oppenheimer, Lazard, Warburg,
Schiff, Kuhn, Loeb, Goldman, Sachs, and so on, has been
tracked and delineated by several authors.
Under the surface,
the Rothschilds long had a powerful influence in dictating American
financial laws. The law records show that they were powers in the old
Bank of the United States - Gustavus Meyers (History of the Great American Fortunes)
|
The evidence clearly
shows these families were no friends of America. The Rothschilds
in particular received prestigious awards from America's
deadliest enemies. For services rendered leading members of the
Rothschild family have been endowed with elite status by royals
and popes. Amschel Mayer Rothschild, for example, was a
Knight of Malta.
The Holy Roman
Emperors from the House of Habsburg kept a considerable number of court
Jews. Among those of Emperor Ferdinand II are mentioned the following:
Solomon and Ber Mayer...Joseph Pincherle of Görz; Moses and Joseph
Marburger (Morpurgo) of Gradisca; Ventura Pariente of Trieste;
the physician Elijah Chalfon of Vienna; Samuel zum Drachen, Samuel zum Straussen, and Samuel zum Weissen Drachen of Frankfort-on-the-Main; and Mordecai Meisel, of Prague. A specially favored court Jew was Jacob Bassevi, the first Jew to be ennobled, with the title "von Treuenberg" - (Wikipedia Online Encyclopedia. Entry on Court Jews) |
James Madison confessed that "I have for some time...been a pensioner on the favor of Haym Salomon, a Jew broker" - ibid
Solomon supposedly wrote the first draft of the United States Constitution according to some historians. Some claim that he designed the Great Seal of the United States, which is why it has what some believe resembles a Jewish Star above the eagle's head design, and it is also on the back of every American one dollar bill. He believed the United States would become a world power - (Hyam Solomon Bio, indopedia.org website) The blunt reality is that the Rothschild banking dynasty in Europe was the dominant force, both financially and politically, in the formation of the Bank of the United States - G. Edward Griffin (The Creature from Jekyll Island) The Rothschilds were Jesuits who used their Jewish background as a façade to cover their sinister activities. The Jesuits, working through Rothschild and Biddle, sought to gain control of the banking system of the United States - Bill Hughes (The Secret Terrorists) Over the years since N. M. Rothschild...had been, for a time, the official European banker for the U.S., government and was a pledged supporter of the Bank of the United States - Derek Wilson (Rothschild: The Wealth and Power of a Dynasty) He was lord and master of the money-market of the world, and of course virtually lord and master of everything else…He literally held the revenues of Southern Italy in pawn, and monarchs and ministers of all countries courted his advice and were guided by his suggestions - Benjamin Disraeli (Prime Minister of England writing on Lord Rothschild) Aware that the Rothschilds are an important Jewish family, I looked them up in Encyclopedia Judaica and discovered that they bear the title “Guardians of the Vatican Treasury”…The appointment of Rothschild gave the black papacy absolute financial power and secrecy. Who would ever search a family of orthodox Jews for the key to the wealth of the Roman Catholic Church? - F. Tupper Saussy (Rulers of Evil) |
The Hofjuden (Court Jews)
Amschel Mayer Rothschild fathered five sons who jointly formed one of the most powerful banking families in history. Amschel died in 1812, which means he may have actively conspired with the Federalists who attempted to found the first US federal bank in 1791. By 1789, Amschel was assisting the House of Hesse and British Crown with their attempts to undermine Napoleon. |
Mayer Amschel Rothschild took over the reigns from his father. He was a Knight of Malta. Elite Masonic Jews have long worked as money men and advisers to Turks, Huns, and Church of Rome. Mayer died in 1855, which means he was in a position to involve himself in the conspiracy to open the second US Federal bank.
Nathan Mayer Rothschild was in charge of the London branch of his family's banking cartel. He was already working in the Stock Exchange from 1804. He established his London bank in 1811. He died in 1836. Of course, long before Nathan's time, Jewish financiers had been active in England. For example, during the Civil War (1642–1651), Manasseh Ben Israel, funded the tyrant Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell personally overturned the legislation banning Jews from England. (Here for more.)
James
Mayer Rothschild was adviser to two French kings. Highly decorated, he
and his four brothers were bestowed the hereditary title of Baron by
Austria's Francis II (the Holy Roman Emperor). James was also appointed
consul-general of the Austrian Empire and, in 1823, he was awarded the
French Legion of Honor. The predecessors of the Rothschilds were the
Hahn family. The Rothschilds are related to the Bauers, Oppenheimers,
Warburgs and Schiffs. These Khazarian crime-families were able
lieutenants of royalty, not the architects of control, as many
misinformed authors believe. They exercise enormous influence over the
American government by way of Masonic lodges and Federal orgs such as
the Federal Reserve Banks.
The facts show that traitorous Nationalists (or should we say Internationalists),
such as Hamilton, Morris, Solomon, Burr and Biddle did
not have the best interests of ordinary Americans at heart. On
the contrary, by way of their Constitution, and later by way of
their banks and credit houses, they sought to subjugate and
impoverish the citizens of America. In his excellent books The Secret Terrorists and Enemy Unmasked,
Bill Hughes details the strong-arm methods used by Biddle to
force wary President Andrew Jackson into commissioning the
founding of the Federal Bank:
Biddle responded to
Jackson refusing to allow him to re-establish the central bank by
shrinking the nation’s money supply. He did this by refusing to make
loans. By so doing, he upended the economy and money disappeared.
Unemployment ran high. Companies went bankrupt because they could not
pay their loans…So confident was he that he publicly boasted that he had
caused the economic wars in America.
Is there no danger to our liberty and independence in a bank that in its nature has so little to bind it to our country? Is there not cause to tremble for the purity of our elections in peace and for the independence of our country in war? Controlling our currency, receiving our public monies, and holding themselves in dependence, it would be more formidable and dangerous than a naval and military power of the enemy - President Andrew Jackson |
Because
Andrew Jackson persistently resisted the threats and devices of
the bankers, he was the victim of an attempted assassination.
The gunman was a certain Richard Lawrence. G. Edward Griffin
wrote:
…Lawrence...boasted
to friends that he had been in touch with powerful people in Europe who
had promised to protect him from punishment should he be caught - (The Creature from Jekyll Island)
|
The Federal bankers
caused the Depression of 1929, and saw to it that thousands of American
businesses were ruined. They funded Adolf Hitler, and financed Lenin's
murderous Bolsheviks. Avaricious financial organizations that plague the
planet, such as the World Bank and IMF (International Monetary Fund),
are merely tentacles of the Federal System.
Immense sums belonging to our national depositors have
been given to Germany on no collateral security
whatsoever…Billions upon billions of our money has been pumped
into Germany by the Federal Reserve Board and the
Federal Reserve Banks - H. S. Kenan (The Federal Reserve Bank)
|
Sir Joseph
Stamp was director of the Bank of England from 1928 to 1941. He
openly addressed the colossal power of the Bankers:
The modern banking system manufactures money out of
nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece
of sleight of hand that was ever invented.
Banking was conceived in iniquity and born in sin.
Bankers own the Earth. Take it away from them,
but leave them the power to create money, and with the
flick of a pen they will create enough money to buy it back
again...Take this great power away from them and all great
fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to
disappear, for then this would be a better and happier world to
live in. But if you want to continue
to be slaves of the banks and pay the cost of your own
slavery, then let the bankers continue to create money and
control credit.
|
President
Thomas Jefferson was not a Freemason, and not the least bit
interested in amassing personal wealth. He had no love for the
Federal bank and made his position clear:
A private central
bank issuing the public currency is a greater menace to the liberties of
the people than a standing army...We must not let our rulers load us
with perpetual debt.
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. |
Nevertheless
Jefferson's reputation is marred on several accounts,
not least by his appointment of British agent Albert Gallatin as
Secretary of the Treasury in 1801. In the same year Gallatin
was also appointed Vice President. Regrettably, a statue of the
duplicitous Geneva-born Gallatin stands to this day outside the
United States Treasury building in Washington DC.
It is interesting and suggestive to note that Alexander Hamilton's banking system precisely paralleled that used by British bankers. He favored what is known as the tontine capitalist system:
It is interesting and suggestive to note that Alexander Hamilton's banking system precisely paralleled that used by British bankers. He favored what is known as the tontine capitalist system:
His tontine scheme,
fashioned after the British tontine of 1789, involved a system of rights
of annual payments to survivors, the annuities therefrom becoming the
means of creating a permanent investment class - Frank Bourgin (The Great Challenge: The Myth of Laissez-Faire in the Early Republic)
|
Political
figures of intelligence and cunning knew the real reason for the
War of Independence. They knew it had to do with money and
usury, and with nationwide colonization, confiscation, and
extortion. They knew the conflict was fomented by British and
European banks, eager to establish control over America, as
they had throughout the world. This fact is admitted by
British agent Benjamin Franklin whose comment takes us to the
heart of the matter:
The inability of the Colonists to get power to issue their own money permanently out of the hands of
King George III and the international bankers, was the prime reason for the revolutionary war |
The Colonists
were not able to free themselves from the clutches of the
international bankers and royal overlords. The War of
Independence was not a victory for the citizens of America. On
the contrary, it was yet one more victory for the aristocracy
that has controlled America from the beginning.
As with the real
first bank, the government had been the only depositor to put up any
real money, with the remainder being raised from loans the investors
made to each other, using the magic of fractional reserve banking. When
time came for renewal of the charter, the bankers were warning of bad
times ahead if they didn't get what they wanted. The charter was not
renewed. Five month later Britain had attacked America and started the
war of 1812 - (Money as History)
Few people are aware today that the history of the United States, since the Revolution in 1776, has been, in large part, the story of an epic struggle to get free, and stay free, of control by the European international banks. This struggle was finally lost in 1913, when President Woodrow Wilson signed the into effect the Federal Reserve Act, putting the International Banking Cartel in charge of creating America's money - Paul Grignon (Money as Debt) |
Thomas Jefferson mentioned the nefarious power of the bankers directly, saying desperately:
I wish it
were possible to obtain a single amendment to our Constitution -
taking from the federal government their power of borrowing.
|
After
Alexander Hamilton's gang had established the Federal Bank, and
the Judiciary with its unlimited power, Jefferson's illusions
concerning America's fate were gone. In 1821, five years
before he died, he recorded his misgivings and foreboding:
It has long...been
my opinion...that the germ of dissolution of our federal judiciary is in
the constitution of the federal judiciary; an irresponsible body
working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a
little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the
field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped from the states, and
the government of all be consolidated into one. To this I am opposed,
because when all government...shall be drawn to Washington as the center
of all power, it will render powerless the checks provided of one
government on another, and will become as venal and oppressive as the
government from which we separated.
Our government is now taking so steady a course as to show by what road it will pass to destruction, to wit, by consolidation first, and then corruption, its necessary consequences. |
The following year Jefferson's insight sharpened all the more. His words reveal the accuracy of his foresight:
If ever this vast country is brought under a single government, it will be one of the most extensive corruption...
|
In
fact Jefferson had misgivings about the state of affairs
in America many years before he wrote these words. Between
1784 and 1789 he had been living in France as minister to that
country. Upon his return to America he was horrified to see how
little effect the grand precepts and provisos of the
Declaration of Independence, which he had chiefly formulated,
had made. Alfred Jay Knock explains:
On arriving in New
York and resuming his place in the social life of the country, he was
greatly depressed by the discovery that the principles of the
Declaration had gone wholly by the board. No one spoke of natural rights
and popular sovereignty, it would seem actually that no one had ever
heard of them. On the contrary, everyone was talking about the pressing
need of a strong central coercive authority, able to check the
incursions which the "democratic spirit" was likely to incite upon "the
men of principle and property"...Clearly, though the Declaration might
have been the charter of American independence, it was in no sense the
charter of the new American State - (Our Enemy: the State)
|
Thomas
Jefferson. Along with William Paterson, Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry and
Samuel Adams, he put state rights before the demands of insatiable
tyrannous Federalists. He understood that the Constitution works on a
state level, but does not work when it is interpreted and implemented on
the Federal level, by men who can not only force states to submit to
the Federal will, but who print money to thereby cover up their failures
and perpetuate their unsustainable policies that would be shot down on
the state level.
|
Patrick
Henry, long time critic of the Constitution's drafters,
also clearly foresaw the totalitarianism of the Federalists:
My
great objection to this Government is, that it does not leave us the
means of defending our rights; or of waging war against tyrants...Have
we the means of resisting disciplined armies, when our only defense, the
militia, is put into the hands of Congress? - (Speech of 5 June, 1788)
Did you ever read of any revolution in any nation, brought about by the punishment of those in power, inflicted by those who had no power at all?...Will your Mace-bearer be a match for a disciplined regiment?...Will the oppressor ever let go of the oppressed? Was there ever an instance? Can the annals of mankind exhibit one single example, where rulers, overcharged with power, willingly let go of the oppressed? - ibid A standing army we shall have also, to execute the execrable commands of tyranny - ibid |
Alfred Jay Nock summarizes the travesty and the tragedy in these words:
Nowhere in the
history of the constitutional period do we find the faintest suggestion
of the Declaration's doctrine of natural rights, and we find its
doctrine of popular sovereignty not only continuing in abeyance, but
constitutionally estopped from ever reappearing. Nowhere do we find
a trace of the Declaration's theory of government, on the contrary, we find it expressly repudiated. The new political mechanism was a faithful replica of the old disestablished British model, but so far improved and strengthened as to be incomparably more close-working and efficient...presenting more attractive possibilities of capture and control - (Our Enemy: the State) |
Nothing that
governments do is new. Despots within government operate
according to plans that are repeated in various ways over
generations. Their control is aided and abetted by their
co-conspirators in the media. The politicians and media spin
doctors are instructed by overlords who control the private
banks and "philanthropic" foundations.
Public
sentiment is everything. With public sentiment nothing can
fail. Without it nothing can succeed. He who molds opinion is
greater than he who enacts laws - Abraham Lincoln
|
In many cases
the politicians, media men and bankers are themselves under the
tutelage and direction of British and European aristocracy who
have made the "board," so to speak, on which the great
geopolitical games are played.
The conspirators who organize the geopolitical game are cautious and do not want their true allegiances or diabolical schemes to be publicly exposed. Each group and individual conspirator knows how vulnerable they are. They know the facts about their true allegiances and agendas must never leak out to the masses at large. Their success depends upon human apathy and ignorance.
The conspirators who organize the geopolitical game are cautious and do not want their true allegiances or diabolical schemes to be publicly exposed. Each group and individual conspirator knows how vulnerable they are. They know the facts about their true allegiances and agendas must never leak out to the masses at large. Their success depends upon human apathy and ignorance.
In "Red
Dusk and the Morrow"...by Sir Paul Dukes, formerly Chief of
the British Secret Service in Russia, we read that a
Lithuanian asked a prominent Bolshevik how the regime
was maintained. The answer was: "Our power is based on three
things: first, on Jewish brains; secondly, on Lettish and
Chinese bayonets; and thirdly, on the crass
stupidity of the Russian people - Denis Fahey (The Rulers of Russia)
|
The
elitist conspirators also know that should civil unrest
occur, the masses can be forced back into line by threats to
their material and emotional security. The strategy is tried and
true, and usually works wonders. As Ernest Hemingway explained:
The first panacea for a mismanaged nation is inflation of the currency; the second is war. Both bring
a temporary prosperity and both bring a permanent ruin. But both are the refuge of political and economic opportunists. |
The
Trinity of Slavery. This basic diagram delineates how
Atonist royals maintain world control. By way of theology and
politics are human hearts and minds enslaved. Through secret
societies the hierarchy of control is perpetuated and
monitored. As French poet Charles Peguy wrote: "Tyranny
is always better organized that freedom."
Because of the confessions and evidence provided by intelligent, informed whistle-blowers from within religion, politics, royalty and masonry, we know a great deal about how the engines of world and mind control operate. However there are pitfalls when insiders with myopic insight and inflexible allegiances and prejudices attempt to instruct the masses as to the intricacies of oligarchic control. When it comes to exposing the dirty little secrets, and dirty big secrets of those occupying the highest levels of the Atonist power-pyramid, objectivity is essential. Photographs of their hideous visages, taken from a rickety platform constructed by their agents, will be “blurred” and inadequate, to say the least. |
An
alternative schemata of the pyramid of enslavement shows
that sociopolitical power descends from the highest unseen
level to operatives making up the elusive College of
Cardinals situated in Rome and elsewhere. This level of
Solar Cult agents includes the infamous Jesuit
Order and so-called Illuminati. Next, a measure of power
flows down to the level of the many secret societies that
plague the world. Although these denominations may
have a Protestant or Catholic, liberal or conservative
coloring, they are all controlled by the same nefarious
Luciferian cadre. From here, when necessary,
sociopolitical power is loaned to the world's ardent
psychotic Kabalists, better known to the world as "Zionists."
The highest echelon within this branch know that their
ideology has little to do with official Judaism, as
it has been put before us. They know they are the
privileged descendents of ancestors who long served ancient
imperial concerns, such as the Merovingians and
Hapsburgs, etc. When necessary, this group lends a modicum of
sociopolitical power to the lowest level of
ill-informed but violent extremists of all persuasions to run
amok with their fanatical ideologies, deliberately
wreaking havoc and unrest, so higher agendas are not
uncovered and thwarted.
|
Philosopher Ayn Rand frequently warned readers about the evils of big government:
Instead of being a
protector of man’s rights, the government is becoming their most
dangerous violator; instead of guarding freedom the government is
establishing slavery; instead of protecting men from the initiators of
physical force, the government is initiating physical force and coercion
in any manner and issue it pleases; instead of serving as the
instrument of objectivity in human relationships, the government is
creating a deadly subterranean reign of uncertainty and fear…instead of
protecting men from injury by whim, the government is arrogating to
itself the power of unlimited whim, so that we are fast approaching the
stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free
to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by
permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history,
the stage of rule by brute force.
|
Rand laid it on the line when addressing the crimes of government:
Criminals are a
small minority in any age or community. And the harm they have dome to
mankind is infinitesimal when compared to the horrors - the bloodshed,
the wars, the persecution, the famines, the enslavements, the wholesale
destruction - perpetrated by mankind’s governments. Potentially,
a government is the most dangerous threat to man’s rights - When
unlimited and unrestricted by individual rights, a government is men’s
deadliest enemy.
|
Before
her perceptive words were written, French philosopher
Pierre Joseph Proudhon addressed the "people
versus government" problem:
To be
Governed is to be watched, inspected, spied upon, directed,
law-driven, numbered, regulated, enrolled, indoctrinated,
preached at, controlled, checked, estimated, valued,
censured, commanded, by creatures who have neither the right
nor the wisdom nor the virtue to do so. To be Governed is to be
at every operation, at every transaction noted,
registered, counted, taxed, stamped, measured, numbered,
assessed, licensed, authorized, admonished, prevented,
forbidden, reformed, corrected, punished. It is, under pretext
of public utility, and in the name of the general
interest, to be placed under contribution, drilled, fleeced,
exploited, monopolized, extorted from, squeezed, hoaxed,
robbed; then, at the slightest resistance, the first word of
complaint, to be repressed, fined, vilified, harassed,
hunted down, abused, clubbed, disarmed, bound, choked,
imprisoned, judged, condemned, shot, deported, sacrificed,
sold, betrayed; and to crown all, mocked, ridiculed,
derided, outraged, dishonored. That is government; that is its
justice; that is its morality - (General Idea of the Revolution in the Nineteenth Century)
|
Victorian philosopher Herbert Spencer pondered whether man requires governments at all:
What, then, do they
(Humans) want a government for? Not to regulate commerce; not to educate
the people; not to teach religion; not to administer charity; not to
make roads and railways; but simply to defend the natural rights of man -
to protect person and property - to prevent the aggressions of the
powerful upon the weak - in a word, to administer justice. This is the
natural, the original, office of a government. It was not intended to do
less: it ought not to be allowed to do more - (The Man Versus the State)
|
He also wrote:
The great political
superstition of the past was the divine right of kings. The great
political superstition of the present is the divine right of
parliaments.
|
Father of the
Anarchist movement, Mikhail Bakunin - who spent many
years imprisoned in dungeons - knew all about government
oppression. For him governments were unnecessary institutions
that darkened the world:
The liberty of man
consists solely in this, that he obeys the laws of nature, because he
has himself recognized them as such, and not because they have been
imposed upon him externally by any foreign will whatsoever, human or
divine, collective or individual - (God and the State, 1882)
|
German philosopher
Friedrich Nietzsche understood why governments exist, and how
they maintain their malignant dominion:
...a fullness of
state power such as only despotism had enjoyed...surpassed all
the past because it strove for the formal annihilation
of the individual...Once the earth is brought under
all-embracing economic control, then mankind will find it has
been reduced to machinery in its service, as a monstrous
clockwork system of ever smaller, more finely adjusted
wheels.
|
Spanish philosopher Jose Ortega Y Gasset explained State corruption in these words:
This is the gravest danger that today threatens
civilization: State intervention, the absorption of all
spontaneous social effort by the State, that is to say, of
spontaneous historical action, which in the long-run sustains,
nourishes and impels human destinies.
|
His sentiments were shared by the American critic Henry L. Menken, who said the Federal State:
...has spread out its powers until they penetrate to
every act of the citizen, however secret, it has begun to throw
around its operations the high dignity and impeccability of a
State religion, its agents become a separate and superior
caste, with authority to bind and loose...But it still
remains, as it was in the beginning, the common enemy of all
well-disposed industrious and decent men.
|
In his important book on State totalitarianism, Our Enemy: the State, Albert Jay Nock explained the motives of State officials:
It
is unfortunately none too well understood that, just
as the State has no money of its own, so it has no power of its
own. All power it has is what society gives it, plus what it
confiscates from time to time on one pretext or another;
there is no other source from which State power can be
drawn. Therefore every assumption of State power, whether by
gift or seizure, leaves society with so much less power; there
is never, nor can be, any strengthening of State power
without a corresponding and roughly equivalent depletion of
social power.
|
Nock
understands that there is not a jot of difference between
American Federalists and the diabolical Socialists who have
plagued the world. He put the matter plainly:
The superficial distinctions of Fascism, Bolshevism,
Hitlerism, are the concern of journalists and publicists, the
serious student sees in them only one root-idea of a complete
conversion of social power to State power...The positive
testimony of history is that the State invariably had its
origin in conquest and confiscation. No known State known to
history originated in any other manner.
|
Freedom can go to hell, but apparently silly belief systems and fanatical prejudices are welcome to stay.
|
The men who
profited from the Constitution's acceptance, expertly used fear
to further their interests and to goad delegates into compliance
with their will. They manipulated the fact that Americans were
traumatized and exhausted by war. They stage-managed the
Conventions and controlled media reportage of events in
Virginia and Philadelphia.
If the people had the time to relax and educate themselves, if they had paid attention to the warnings of Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry, and the other critics who suspected what the conspirators were planning, the Constitution would never have been ratified. |
The best the people belatedly received was the Bill of Rights drafted in 1791. It was expressly created to protect people
against potential abuses of the ill-received Constitution. It was
conceded to the American people by Madison, who by then had secured all
that he and his Federalist colleagues demanded.
A
number of states had accepted the Constitution with urgent
recommendations for changes. At first, it seemed that Congress
would pay no attention to these suggestions. Patrick Henry
and other then set up a clamor which had to be heeded, and
Congress referred the proposals to a committee - Nevins and Commanger (Pocket History of the U.S.)
The federalists delayed ratification of the Bill of Rights for over two years while they organized the new federal courts and armed the judges with powers to counter individual rights - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty) |
The
Federalists instigated virtual panic, and made sure the people
were not able to take time to repair and think. Their
representatives and delegates were harried into accepting and
signing the Constitution. The same methods of "conflict control"
have been used throughout the generations. They are still
being put to good use by politicians and parties. In the 1960s,
Ex-Communist Jerry Kirk discovered how the great game is played.
He eloquently explained the process in these words:
The
idea is to create a situation where the people are so
frightened of the chaos all around them, that they will throw
their arms up in the air and shout “Federal Government, do
something!” And the only choice open will be Martial Law…The
Communists, black militants and revolutionaries will
never succeed in overthrowing the government of the United
States, but unless they are stopped, they will scare the
American people into accepting Socialism from Washington, and
status rule from the Establishment. This is what it is
really all about.
|
Expert on the
British takeover of America, G. Edward Griffin, explains the
mechanics of conflict-control in these words:
…deliberately create
problems, and then offer only those solutions which result in the
expansion of government. Create conditions so frightful at home and
abroad that the abandonment of personal liberties and national
sovereignty will appear as a reasonable price for a return to domestic
tranquility and world peace - (The Capitalist Conspiracy)
|
Student
Socialist agitator James S. Kunen also discovered how
the upper echelon conspires to foment social unrest, so the true
enemies of freedom remain undetected:
In the evening we
went up to the University to check out a strategy meeting. A kid was
giving a report on the SDS Convention. He said that...at the Convention
men from Business International Round Tables...tried to buy up a few
radicals...These men are the world's leading industrialists and they
convene to decide how our lives are going to go. These are the guys who
wrote the Alliance for Progress. They are the left wing of the ruling
class...They offered to finance our demonstrations in Chicago (l968). We
were offered Esso (Rockefeller) money. They want us to make a lot of
radical commotion so they can look more in the center as they move to
the left - (The Strawberry Statement: Notes of a College Revolutionary)
|
The scrapping
of the US Constitution is essential. Americans must revise and
update the Articles of Confederation and abolish the
corrupt totalitarian Federal apparatus of control. Americans must wake
up from their delirium and find out what kind of
conspiracy has been occurring in their land. They must
contemplate the words of Bertrand de Jouvenal, who said
"A society of sheep must in time beget a government of
wolves," and remember that it was mutineers and not conformists
who founded America.
The traitors are still with us. Indeed their treachery is greater than ever. Hiding behind the Constitution and political process they see to it America's ports are sold and that schools are swamped and under-funded. Because of their scandalous policies America's heavy industry operates at a minimum. American businesses are throttled by legality and taxation, while foreign-made products fill the shelves. Companies and jobs are perpetually outsourced, prisons supersize and innocent men and women languish behind bars to be raped and tortured. Poisons fall from the sky in the form of chemtrails, and illegal aliens occupy like invading armies, enjoying the "fruits" they did nothing to cultivate or harvest. It all occurs in a country that came out of World War II richer than it went in.
Why is this the case? What has happened? Why have so few taken so much from so many for so long?
The traitors are still with us. Indeed their treachery is greater than ever. Hiding behind the Constitution and political process they see to it America's ports are sold and that schools are swamped and under-funded. Because of their scandalous policies America's heavy industry operates at a minimum. American businesses are throttled by legality and taxation, while foreign-made products fill the shelves. Companies and jobs are perpetually outsourced, prisons supersize and innocent men and women languish behind bars to be raped and tortured. Poisons fall from the sky in the form of chemtrails, and illegal aliens occupy like invading armies, enjoying the "fruits" they did nothing to cultivate or harvest. It all occurs in a country that came out of World War II richer than it went in.
Why is this the case? What has happened? Why have so few taken so much from so many for so long?
As of 2000, USA
Today reports on its front page that 6.6 million adults (three percent
of the adult population) are in prison or “correction.” No other society
as ever done so deadly a thing to its people and on such a scale - Gore Vidal (Imperial America)
We have two million people in jail. Our country doesn't build hospitals, doesn't build schools and doesn't build day-care centers. It builds prisons. This is not the hallmark of a free society, but of a police state - Steven Hager (High Times Editor-in-Chief) |
Oriental countries
prosper and rise economically. The Third World is fast becoming
the First World, while the First World nose-dives into
ruin. This was the plan from the outset. It is the result of tyranny
not democracy. It is also the result of apathy. No truer words
on the subject were stated than those by President Abraham
Lincoln:
These United States
of America can never be destroyed from forces outside its borders. If
America falls, it will fall from within. Brought down by apathy. When
good people do nothing, Anarchy reigns - (Letter to Congress, 1854)
|
Lincoln also
emphasized the despotism of wealthy oligarchs who prosper from
the ignorance and apathy of the masses.
The
money power preys upon the nation in times of peace and
conspires against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic
than a monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish
than bureaucracy.
|
Robert Maynard Hutchins also commented on the apathetic state brought on by over-stimulation and trauma:
The death
of democracy is not likely to be an assassination from
ambush. It will be a slow extinction from apathy, indifference,
and undernourishment.
|
Senator from Nevada, George W. Malone, made the following statement before Congress in 1957:
I believe that if the people of this nation fully
understood what Congress has done to them over the last 49
years, they would move on Washington; they would not wait for
an election...It adds up to a preconceived plan to
destroy the economic and social independence of the United
States!
|
Ironically, during
and after the War of Independence the eyes of the world were on
America. The Czar of Russia, Nicholas Romanov II,
admired what he saw taking place and, before his brutal
assassination, was ready to emulate the scintillating American
experiment. During the War of Independence he sent ships, money
and troops to assist American rebels. Russia and many
other countries would have changed for the better had Americans
not been cajoled into adopting the Constitution.
The good news is that
even the most oppressive tyranny cannot last forever. Once the tyrant
and his heinous industry is exposed, the game is up. At that point they
can be overthrown, and things can be put aright. It has happened in
Ireland and the Congo, in Cuba and Nicaragua, and many other lands. But
the enemy knows this only too well. He understands that he is
vulnerable, and is aware of how he could be undermined. As a result, he
is constantly on guard. He knows that his activities and methods must
not be properly scrutinized. Consequently, he makes a point of keeping
his subjects in fear for their lives. He prefers them to be limbic
creatures unable to reason and discern good from bad and right from
wrong. He makes sure their attention is focused elsewhere, and that
strange, demented, and frightening "enemies" are always rattling the
gates. Through his obedient agents, he funds and controls the supposed
enemies, and instructs them how to operate.
In this manner is the great game of geopolitics and mass control played. It is simply chess on a global level. Should a pawn fall off the board or be sacrificed, the kings, queens and bishops do not turn a hair. The comfortably placed misleaders bang the drums of war and send dedicated men and women to fight and die for the "United States" corporation. The U.S. is a business, and those who have given their lives for it died uselessly. Tragically they have been sacrificed at the behest of their country's true enemies. As Count Leo Tolstoy wisely said "Government is an association of men who do violence to the rest of us." |
George William Frederick (George III), King of Great Britain and Hanover. He was a member of the Hanover dynasty - the so-called House of Orange. Like numerous royals, he was a demented maniac who suffered from mental disease. According to author George Trevelyan, he vowed "never to acknowledge the independence of the Americans, and to punish their contumacy by the indefinite prolongation of a war which promised to be eternal." He wanted to "keep the rebels harassed, anxious and poor, until the day when, by a natural and inevitable process, discontent and disappointment were converted into penitence and remorse." |
Military men are dumb, stupid animals, to be used as pawns for foreign policy - Henry Kissinger (January-February 2003 edition of Eagle Newsletter)
It's not a number I’m terribly interested in - Colin Powell (reply when asked about the Iraqi casualties) The men who committed this atrocity in New York, on September Eleventh 2001, mass murdered more people than the combined killings of every serial killer in the 228 year history of the United States - Anthony J. Hilder (The Greatest Lie Ever Sold) |
President Andrew Jackson suffered terribly at under the British Crown. During the war he and his brother were captured, held prisoner and nearly starved to death. When Andrew refused to clean the boots of a Red Coat, he was slashed with a sword which left him with scars on his head and left hand. His brother Robert died from smallpox contracted while a captive. Jackson's immediate family died from wartime hardships. As a result of these horrific experiences Jackson never forgave the British oppressors. |
Our
point is simple. We insist that the predators and parasites
who have vampirized America and the world must be closely
studied. Understanding how and why they function as they do
provides us with the keys of worldly salvation.
Moreover, we must understand that the elite despots of the world are creatures of habit. The enjoy repetition and their nefarious strategies are tried and true. Additionally, we must understand that these demagogues bank on one human weakness, forgetfulness. Historical amnesia hands them the power they covet. As Milan Kundera so appropriately said: "The struggle of man against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting." The answer to humankind's future lies in remembering what has transpired in history. It lies in not repeating past mistakes, and not falling for the same tired political fallacies. Furthermore, we must end our psychological dependence on the fiends who have established despotic forms of government and who benefit from our allegiance. As long as we consciously or unconsciously identify with the predator, we will never see the demise of tyranny, regardless of the political action taken. It will raise its ugly head time after time. Ultimately we must judge our misleaders by their deeds rather than their words. We must be on guard against their rhetoric and sophistry, and not hesitate to use existing laws to prevent them doing their worst. We must not be afraid to seek justice when degenerate, self-serving politicians - supposedly acting in our name - seek to lead us astray. |
Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil
obedience. Our problem is that numbers of people all over the
world have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their
government and have gone to war, and millions have been killed
because of this obedience...Our problem is that people are
obedient all over the world in the face of poverty and
starvation and stupidity, and war, and cruelty. Our problem is
that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty
thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running
the country. That's our problem - Howard Zinn
|
Americans don't care about politics, only about politicians - Anthony Wedgwood Benn
|
The
Articles of Confederation worked to bring security to all
Americans. They restored order after the chaos of the War of
Independence. Unlike the US Constitution, the Articles of
Confederation honored the rights of individual States.
The Articles did not distinguish between rich and poor. They were meant for Citizens, not "People," and did not permit an oligarchy to assume totalitarian control. The men who drafted and ratified the US Constitution were hungry for power over human beings. They adamantly wanted to protect their own prestige and wealth. Despite their megalomania they knew what they wanted and how to go about getting it. They acted like proverbial wolves in sheep's clothing. Their Constitution is deceptive in form and substance. It allowed an aristocracy to preside in America. The American-based aristocrats may not wear crowns or sit upon thrones, but they are in many cases directly related or connected to royal dynasties of Britain and Europe. |
George
W. Bush is for example a distant cousin of John Kerry, the presidential
nominee who ran against him in 2004. Kerry's parents are not Irish but
Jewish. On the matter of his aristocratic ancestry we read:
Senator John Kerry
has blue blood from all the royal houses of Europe, with even more
titled relations than President Bush…Burke’s Peerage, which researches
the genealogy, said the Democratic presidential candidate traces descent
through his mother, Rosemary Forbes, to the royal houses of Albania,
England, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Russia, Byzantium, Persia (Iran) and
France. Forbes was descended from William Forbes, the Laird of Newe, and
extended family that included many baronets…It is via this family that
the Democratic candidate is descended from Henry II, the king of England
and father of Richard the Lionheart, who was the leader of the third
Crusade in 1189…By contrast, Bush is related to Queen Elizabeth II,
twenty British dukes and many European princes…President Bush, Princess
Diana and Winston Churchill are distantly related - (Union Jack Newspaper; September 2000 Edition)
|
George H. W. Bush and wife Barbara are related to the same British oligarchs. Additionally, George is:
...closely
related to every European monarch on and off the throne – and
has kinship with every member of Britain’s royal family, the
House of Windsor. He is the 13th cousin of Britain’s
Queen Mother, and of her daughter Queen Elizabeth, and is the
13th cousin once removed of the heir to the throne, Prince
Charles. Bush’s family tree can be documented as far back
as the early 15th century. He has a direct descent from
Henry III and from Henry VIII’s sister Mary Tudor who was also
the wife of Louis XI of France. He is also descended from
Charles II of England - David Icke (Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster)
Father George and wife Barbara are both descendants of Godfroi de Bouillon who, in 1099, led European noblemen in the successful Crusade to recapture Jerusalem from the Islamic faith and moved into the King’s palace at Temple Mount…Godfroi de Bouillon was the first king of Jerusalem and the Duke of Lower Lorraine, a major region for the Illuminati bloodline - ibid |
The time has
come for the veils of mystique to be torn away from the
so-called "Fathers" of the Constitution. They were not champions
of a free, sovereign nation, and their legacy is neither
auspicious nor grand. They chose to subvert the Articles that
guaranteed freedom to every American. They coveted power
and made themselves fabulously rich by exploiting the
gullibility and ignorance of the moral but illiterate, masses.
In our time their villainous counterparts in government have
shifted into overdrive. Their heinous acts of conquest,
extortion and confiscation know no bounds. As long as ignorance
of the enemy's nature persists, nothing will change, and the
pirates of Capitol Hill will continue to ply their
insidious trade. As King George once demanded, the war against
America was to be waged eternally. His desire
is being fulfilled as every day passes. Unless the
Machiavellian intrigues of his biological and ideological
descendants are exposed and overcome, America's ruin is certain.
The task is, however, impossible without knowledge
of the adversary. Knowledge is the weapon we must use to
eradicate the imperious predators that lurk behind the long
grass. of history.
“Conspiracy!”
One of the darkest words in the language of man. Yet there is
hardly a single page of History that does not partially reveal
the deadly eye of Conspiracy at work. It was a
conspiracy that lead Brutus against Caesar in the Roman senate
on the Ides of March...that plotted the betrayal of
West Point by Benedict Arnold, during the American
Revolution…that led John Wilkes Booth to the assassination of
President Lincoln on Good Friday 1865. The past record of man
is burdened with accounts of assassinations, secret
combines, palace plots and betrayals in war. But
in spite of this clear record, an amazing number of people
have begun to scoff at the possibility of conspiracy at
work today. They dismiss such an idea merely as a
conspiratorial view - G. Edward Griffin (The Capitalist Conspiracy)
|
Knowledge of
the enemy is the golden key that opens the gate to a future free
of tyranny and slavery. We not only owe our children a freer
future - we owe it to our forebears. Those who fought and
labored to create the elements of civilization we enjoy, but who
were treacherously undermined and robbed, must be
remembered and reverently toasted. It is their memory we honor, not that of their destroyers.
Where other men have skimmed the surface, Beard has gone through to the core.
He stayed months in Washington to get to the core. In
his search for ancient papers and documents in the Treasury
Department, he went into vaults that were so filled with dust
that it was necessary to excavate the papers with a
vacuum cleaner. But when he came back to the surface he had
damning evidence against a good many of the "patriot fathers."
He then knew why they were so anxious, not only for a new
constitution, but for the particular kind of a constitution
that was afterward adopted - Allan L. Benson (The Dishonest Constitution)
|
Primary References
The Declatory Act
Society of the Cincinnati
The Constitution That Never Was
Anti-Federalism
The Articles of Confederation
The Articles of Confederation
The Articles of Confederation
George Washington Exposed
Masonic Presidents
American War of Independence
Declaration of Independence
The United States Constitution
The Philadelphia Convention
United States Bill of Rights
Aaron Burr
Federalist Party
Alien and Sedition Acts
Benjamin Franklin: Mason and Jew
Benjamin Franklin
Patrick Henry
Thomas Paine
Thomas Jefferson
William Paterson
Abraham Yates
Samuel Adams
Andrew Jackson
James Madison
Alexander Hamilton
Robert Morris
Nicholas Biddle
Benedict Arnold
Albert Gallatin
Second Bank of the United States
First Bank of the United States
The Federal Reserve Banks
Bank of Manhattan
History of Money
Gouverneur Morris
Jewish Merchant Bankers
Haym Soloman
The Rothschilds
Rothschilds & their Awards
Jews in the Bush Administration
History of the Jews in England
Menasseh Ben Israel
Israel Jacobson
The Hofjuden (Palace Jews)
The Hofjuden (Palace Jews)
James Wilson
Richard Lawrence
The Whiskey Rebellion
Shay's Rebellion
Tontine Capitalism
Baron de Montesquieu
John Locke
The Hellfire Club
Philolexian Society
King George III
King William I (of the Netherlands)
House of Wettin
Saxe-Coburg-Gotha dynasty 1
Saxe-Coburg-Gotha dynasy 2
The Hesse-Kassel dynasty 1
The Hesse-Kassel dynasty 2
House of Hanover
House of Windsor
Duchy of Brunswick-Lüneburg
The State of Hesse
The State of Thuringia
Society General of Belgium
Direct Representation
Society of the Cincinnati
The Constitution That Never Was
Anti-Federalism
The Articles of Confederation
The Articles of Confederation
The Articles of Confederation
George Washington Exposed
Masonic Presidents
American War of Independence
Declaration of Independence
The United States Constitution
The Philadelphia Convention
United States Bill of Rights
Aaron Burr
Federalist Party
Alien and Sedition Acts
Benjamin Franklin: Mason and Jew
Benjamin Franklin
Patrick Henry
Thomas Paine
Thomas Jefferson
William Paterson
Abraham Yates
Samuel Adams
Andrew Jackson
James Madison
Alexander Hamilton
Robert Morris
Nicholas Biddle
Benedict Arnold
Albert Gallatin
Second Bank of the United States
First Bank of the United States
The Federal Reserve Banks
Bank of Manhattan
History of Money
Gouverneur Morris
Jewish Merchant Bankers
Haym Soloman
The Rothschilds
Rothschilds & their Awards
Jews in the Bush Administration
History of the Jews in England
Menasseh Ben Israel
Israel Jacobson
The Hofjuden (Palace Jews)
The Hofjuden (Palace Jews)
James Wilson
Richard Lawrence
The Whiskey Rebellion
Shay's Rebellion
Tontine Capitalism
Baron de Montesquieu
John Locke
The Hellfire Club
Philolexian Society
King George III
King William I (of the Netherlands)
House of Wettin
Saxe-Coburg-Gotha dynasty 1
Saxe-Coburg-Gotha dynasy 2
The Hesse-Kassel dynasty 1
The Hesse-Kassel dynasty 2
House of Hanover
House of Windsor
Duchy of Brunswick-Lüneburg
The State of Hesse
The State of Thuringia
Society General of Belgium
Direct Representation
Additional References
Trading With The Enemy Act (Origin of the US Slave Nation)
Court and Lawyer Corruption 1
Court and Lawyer Corruption 2
The Crown Corporation
The Corporation of London
Who Owns the World?
British Control of USA-1
British Control of USA-2
British Control of USA-3
The United States is still a British Colony 1
The United States is still a British Colony 2
British Infiltration of America: Proof from the Congressional Record
How Britain Caused the American Depression
British Banks Own US Federal Reserve
Secret Proceedings & Debates of the Convention
The Largest Empire in the World
Lord Palmerston's Multicultural Zoo
The British East India Company
Dutch East India Company
Virginia Company
Hudson Bay Company
Massachusetts Bay Company
Ohio Company of Virginia
Mississippi Company
Potomac Company
Vandalia Company
Philolexian Society
The Russell Trust
The Pilgrims Society
Who Rules America?
Georgetown University
World Trade Organization
Council on Foreign Relations
Trilateral Commission
The Royal Institute of International Affairs
Edward Mandell House
The Congress of Vienna
The League of Nations
Dope Inc
Dr. John Coleman vids
The Black Venetians I
The Black Venetians II
Secrets of the Federal Reserve
Secret Societies & Subversive Movements
The Burr Conspiracy
Stolen Government
The Kellogg-Briand Pact
Court and Lawyer Corruption 1
Court and Lawyer Corruption 2
The Crown Corporation
The Corporation of London
Who Owns the World?
British Control of USA-1
British Control of USA-2
British Control of USA-3
The United States is still a British Colony 1
The United States is still a British Colony 2
British Infiltration of America: Proof from the Congressional Record
How Britain Caused the American Depression
British Banks Own US Federal Reserve
Secret Proceedings & Debates of the Convention
The Largest Empire in the World
Lord Palmerston's Multicultural Zoo
The British East India Company
Dutch East India Company
Virginia Company
Hudson Bay Company
Massachusetts Bay Company
Ohio Company of Virginia
Mississippi Company
Potomac Company
Vandalia Company
Philolexian Society
The Russell Trust
The Pilgrims Society
Who Rules America?
Georgetown University
World Trade Organization
Council on Foreign Relations
Trilateral Commission
The Royal Institute of International Affairs
Edward Mandell House
The Congress of Vienna
The League of Nations
Dope Inc
Dr. John Coleman vids
The Black Venetians I
The Black Venetians II
Secrets of the Federal Reserve
Secret Societies & Subversive Movements
The Burr Conspiracy
Stolen Government
The Kellogg-Briand Pact
Recommended Reading (Selected List):
Dope Inc - L. Larouche, W. Tarpley (& Co)
Treason in America - Anton Chaitkin
The Quartet - Joseph J. Ellis
Hamilton's Curse - Thomas DiLorenzo
The Syndicate - Nicholas Hagger
The Secret History of the West - Nicolas Hagger
The Secret Founding of America - NIcholas Hagger
The Empire of the City - E. C. Knuth
Hologram of Liberty - Kenneth. W. Royce
Our Enemy: the State - Albert Jay Nock
An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution - Charles A. Beard
The Constitution That Never Was - Ralph Boryszewski
The Federalist Papers - Douglas Adair
Secret Societies of America's Elite - Steven Stora
The Secret Terrorists - Bill Hughes
The Enemy Unmasked - Bill Hughes
The Real Lincoln - Thomas DiLorenzo
Blacklisted by History - M. Stanton Evans
The Ruling Elite - Deanna Springola
America's Secret Establishment - Anthony Sutton
Trilaterals Over America - Anthony Sutton
The Creature from Jekyll Island - G. Edward Griffin
The Capitalist Conspiracy - G. Edward Griffin
The World Order - Eustace Mullins
Secrets of the Federal Reserve - Eustace Mullins
Tragedy and Hope - Dr. Carroll Quigley
The Anglo-American Establishment - Dr. Carroll Quigley
Bloodlines of the Illuminati - Fritz Springmeier
Our Invisible Government - Myron Fagan
CFR Unmasked - Myron Fagan
The Illuminati - Myron Fagan
The Invisible Government - Dan Smoot
The Unseen Hand - Ralph Epperson
Conspirator's Hierarchy: The Committee of 300 - J. Coleman
The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations - John Coleman
Diplomacy By Deception - John Coleman
None Dare Call It Treason - John Stormer
The Rockefeller File - Sen. Gary Allen
None Dare Call It Conspiracy - Sen. Gary Allen
Kissinger: The Secret Side of the Secretary of State - Sen. Gary Allen
In the Beginning: Story of the International Trade Cartel - R. K. Hoskins
The True History of the Bilderberg Group - Daniel Estulin
Secret Societies & Subversive Movements - Nesta Webster
The French Revolution - Nesta Webster
World Revolution - Nesta Webster
Illuminsim - Nesta Webster
Occult Theocracy - Edith Star Mille (Lady Queensborough)
Architects of Deception - Juri Lina
Under the Sign of the Scorpion - Juri Lina
My Awakening - David Duke
Controversy of Zion - Douglas Reed
The Power of Israel in the United States - James Petras
War is a Racket - Gen. Smedley D. Butler
Death by Government - R. J. Rummell
Fifty Years in the Church of Rome - Father Chiniquy
The Secret History of the Jesuits - Edmund Paris
Vatican Billions - Avro Manhattan
The Vatican Moscow Washington Alliance - Avro Manhattan
Catholic Imperialism & World Freedom - Avro Manhattan
The Vatican Holocaust - Avro Manhattan
Vatican Assassins - Eric Jon Phelps
Click here for more legal empowerment vids and sources
Click here for additional threads on Empire of Death, War on You, Important Teachers, etc
http://www.michaeltsarion.com/constitution-con.html
Treason in America - Anton Chaitkin
The Quartet - Joseph J. Ellis
Hamilton's Curse - Thomas DiLorenzo
The Syndicate - Nicholas Hagger
The Secret History of the West - Nicolas Hagger
The Secret Founding of America - NIcholas Hagger
The Empire of the City - E. C. Knuth
Hologram of Liberty - Kenneth. W. Royce
Our Enemy: the State - Albert Jay Nock
An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution - Charles A. Beard
The Constitution That Never Was - Ralph Boryszewski
The Federalist Papers - Douglas Adair
Secret Societies of America's Elite - Steven Stora
The Secret Terrorists - Bill Hughes
The Enemy Unmasked - Bill Hughes
The Real Lincoln - Thomas DiLorenzo
Blacklisted by History - M. Stanton Evans
The Ruling Elite - Deanna Springola
America's Secret Establishment - Anthony Sutton
Trilaterals Over America - Anthony Sutton
The Creature from Jekyll Island - G. Edward Griffin
The Capitalist Conspiracy - G. Edward Griffin
The World Order - Eustace Mullins
Secrets of the Federal Reserve - Eustace Mullins
Tragedy and Hope - Dr. Carroll Quigley
The Anglo-American Establishment - Dr. Carroll Quigley
Bloodlines of the Illuminati - Fritz Springmeier
Our Invisible Government - Myron Fagan
CFR Unmasked - Myron Fagan
The Illuminati - Myron Fagan
The Invisible Government - Dan Smoot
The Unseen Hand - Ralph Epperson
Conspirator's Hierarchy: The Committee of 300 - J. Coleman
The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations - John Coleman
Diplomacy By Deception - John Coleman
None Dare Call It Treason - John Stormer
The Rockefeller File - Sen. Gary Allen
None Dare Call It Conspiracy - Sen. Gary Allen
Kissinger: The Secret Side of the Secretary of State - Sen. Gary Allen
In the Beginning: Story of the International Trade Cartel - R. K. Hoskins
The True History of the Bilderberg Group - Daniel Estulin
Secret Societies & Subversive Movements - Nesta Webster
The French Revolution - Nesta Webster
World Revolution - Nesta Webster
Illuminsim - Nesta Webster
Occult Theocracy - Edith Star Mille (Lady Queensborough)
Architects of Deception - Juri Lina
Under the Sign of the Scorpion - Juri Lina
My Awakening - David Duke
Controversy of Zion - Douglas Reed
The Power of Israel in the United States - James Petras
War is a Racket - Gen. Smedley D. Butler
Death by Government - R. J. Rummell
Fifty Years in the Church of Rome - Father Chiniquy
The Secret History of the Jesuits - Edmund Paris
Vatican Billions - Avro Manhattan
The Vatican Moscow Washington Alliance - Avro Manhattan
Catholic Imperialism & World Freedom - Avro Manhattan
The Vatican Holocaust - Avro Manhattan
Vatican Assassins - Eric Jon Phelps
Click here for more legal empowerment vids and sources
Click here for additional threads on Empire of Death, War on You, Important Teachers, etc
http://www.michaeltsarion.com/constitution-con.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)