Friday, February 27, 2015

"To the Shores of Tripoli"

"To the Shores of Tripoli"
  
Great piece on history that is related to our times,
And why the Marine Hymn Contains the Verse,
"To the Shores of Tripoli"
  
Muslim Pirates of the Past  
Most Americans are unaware of the fact that over two hundred years ago, the
United States had declared war on Islam, and Thomas Jefferson led the charge! 
 
At the height of the eighteenth century, Muslim pirates were the
terror of the Mediterranean and a large area of the North Atlantic.
 
They attacked every ship in sight, and held the crews for exorbitant
ransoms.  Those taken hostage were subjected to barbaric
treatment and wrote heart breaking letters home, begging their
government and family members to pay whatever their Mohammedan captors
demanded.
 
These extortionists of the high seas represented the Islamic nations
of Tripoli, Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers collectively referred to as
the Barbary Coast and presented a dangerous and unprovoked threat to
the new American Republic.
 
Before the Revolutionary War, U.S. merchant ships had been under the
protection of Great Britain.  When the U.S. declared its
independence and entered into war, the ships of the United States were
protected by France. However, once the war was won, America had to
protect its own fleets.
 
Thus, the birth of the U.S. Navy.  Beginning in 1784, seventeen years
before he would become president, Thomas Jefferson became Americas
Minister to France.  That same year, the U.S. Congress sought to
appease its Muslim adversaries by following in the footsteps of
European nations who paid bribes to the Barbary States, rather than
engaging them in war.
 
In July of 1785, Algerian pirates captured American ships, and the Dye
of Algiers demanded an unheard-of ransom of $60,000.  It was a
plain and simple case of extortion, and Thomas Jefferson was
vehemently opposed to any further payments.  Instead, he proposed
to Congress the formation of a coalition of allied nations who
together could force the Islamic states into peace.  A
disinterested Congress decided to pay the ransom.
 
In 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with Tripolis ambassador
to Great Britain to ask by what right his nation attacked American
ships and enslaved American citizens, and why Muslims held so much
hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous
contacts.

The two future presidents reported that Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman
Adja had answered that Islam "was founded on the Laws of their
Prophet, that it was written in their Quran, that all nations who
should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was
their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be
found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and
that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in Battle was sure
to go to Paradise."
 
Despite of this stunning admission of premeditated violence on
non-Muslim nations, as well as the objections of many notable American
leaders, including George Washington,
who warned that caving in was
both wrong and would only further embolden the enemy
. For the
following fifteen years, the American government paid the Muslims
millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the
return of American hostages. The payments in ransom and tribute
amounted to over twenty percent of the United States government annual
revenues in 1800.

Jefferson was disgusted.  Shortly after his being sworn in as the third
President of the United States in 1801, the Pasha of Tripoli sent him
a note demanding the immediate payment of $225,000 plus $25,000 a year
for every year forthcoming.  That changed everything.

Jefferson let the Pasha know, in no uncertain terms, what he could do with his
demand.  The Pasha responded by cutting down the flagpole at the
American consulate and declared war on the United States.  Tunis,
Morocco, and Algiers immediately followed suit.  Jefferson, until
now, had been against America raising a naval force for anything
beyond coastal defense, but having watched his nation be cowed by
Islamic thugery for long enough, decided that is was finally time to
meet force with force.
 
He dispatched a squadron of frigates to the Mediterranean and taught
the Muslim nations of the Barbary Coast a lesson he hoped they would
never forget.  Congress authorized Jefferson to empower U.S.
ships to seize all vessels and goods of the Pasha of Tripoli and to
cause to be done all other acts of precaution or hostility as the
state of war would justify.
 
When Algiers and Tunis, who were both accustomed to American cowardice
and acquiescence, saw the newly independent United States had both the
will and the might to strike back, they quickly abandoned their
allegiance
to Tripoli.  The war with Tripoli lasted for four more
years, and raged up again in 1815.  The bravery of the U.S.
Marine Corps in these wars led to the line to the shores of Tripoli
in the Marine Hymn, 
and they would forever be known as leathernecks
for the leather collars of their uniforms, designed to prevent their
heads from being cut off by the Muslim scimitars when boarding enemy
ships.
    
  
Islam, and what its Barbary followers justified doing in the name of
their prophet and their god, disturbed Jefferson quite deeply.
 
America had a tradition of religious tolerance, the fact that Jefferson,
himself, had co-authored the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom,
but fundamentalist Islam was like no other religion the world had ever
seen.  A religion based on supremacism, whose holy book not only
condoned but mandated violence against unbelievers was unacceptable to
him.  His greatest fear was that someday this brand of Islam
would return and pose an even greater threat to the United States.
 
This should bother every American.  That Muslims have brought
about women-only classes and swimming times at taxpayer-funded
universities and public pools; that Christians, Jews, and Hindus have
been banned from serving on juries where Muslim defendants are being judged,
Piggy banks and Porky Pig tissue dispensers have been banned from workplaces
because they offend Islamist sensibilities.

Ice cream has been discontinued at certain Burger King locations because
the picture on the wrapper looks similar to the Arabic script for Allah,
public schools are pulling pork from their menus, on and on in
the newspapers….
 
Its death by a thousand cuts, or inch-by-inch as some refer to it,
and most Americans have no idea that this battle is being waged every
day across America.  By not fighting back, by allowing groups to
obfuscate what is really happening, and not insisting that the
Islamists adapt to our own culture, the United States is cutting its
own throat with a politically correct knife, and helping to further
the Islamists agenda. Sadly, it appears that todays America would
rather be politically correct than victorious.

Any doubts, just
Google Thomas Jefferson vs the Muslim 

Regulators OK 'net neutrality' rules for Internet providers

Regulators OK 'net neutrality' rules for Internet providers


Feb 26, 1:24 PM (ET)
By ANNE FLAHERTY

(AP) Rob Thorp, a member of Backbone Campaign, demonstrates outside the Federal...
Full Image

Google sponsored links
Pres. Obama Ratings - Rate President Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now.
www.newsmax.com/surveys
 
Concealed Carry Guide - Do You Know Your Rights? Get Your Free Concealed Carry Guide Today!
usconcealedcarry.net
 


WASHINGTON (AP) — Internet service providers like Comcast, Verizon, AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile now must act in the "public interest" when providing a mobile connection to your home or phone, under rules approved Thursday by a divided Federal Communications Commission.
The plan, which puts the Internet in the same regulatory camp as the telephone and bans business practices that are "unjust or unreasonable," represents the biggest regulatory shakeup to the industry in almost two decades. The goal is to prevent providers from slowing or blocking web traffic, or creating paid fast lanes on the Internet, said FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler.
The 3-2 vote was expected to trigger industry lawsuits that could take several years to resolve. Still, consumer advocates cheered the regulations as a victory for smaller Internet-based companies which feared they would have to pay "tolls" to move their content.
Net neutrality is the idea that websites or videos load at about the same speed. That means you won't be more inclined to watch a particular show on Amazon Prime instead of on Netflix because Amazon has struck a deal with your service provider to load its data faster.
(AP) Federal Communication Commission (FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler takes his seat before...
Full Image
Opponents, including many congressional Republicans, said the FCC plan constitutes dangerous government overreach that would eventually drive up consumer costs and discourage industry investment.
Republican FCC Commissioners Mike O'Rielly and Ajit Pai, who voted against the plan, alleged that President Barack Obama unfairly used his influence to push through the regulations, calling the plan a "half-baked, illogical, internally inconsistent and indefensible document."
Michael Powell, a former Republican FCC chairman who now runs the National Cable and Telecommunications Association, warned that consumers would almost immediately "bear the burden of new taxes and increased costs, and they will likely wait longer for faster and more innovative networks since investment will slow in the face of bureaucratic oversight."
Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, said he would pursue industry-friendly legislation, although it was unlikely that Obama would sign such a bill. The FCC's five commissioners are expected to testify before a Senate panel March 18.
"One way or another, I am committed to moving a legislative solution, preferably bipartisan, to stop monopoly-era phone regulations that harm Internet consumers and innovation," Thune said in a statement this week.
(AP) Federal Communication Commission (FCC) ChairmanTom Wheeler, center, joins hands with...
Full Image
It's not true that consumers would see new taxes right away. The Internet Tax Freedom Act bans taxes on Internet access, although that bill expires in October. While Congress is expected to renew that legislation, it's conceivable that states could eventually push Congress for the ability to tax Internet service now that it has been deemed a vital public utility.
"Read my lips. More Internet taxes are coming. It's just a matter of when," Commissioner Pai said.
For years, providers mostly agreed not to pick winners and losers among Web traffic because they didn't want to encourage regulators to step in and because they said consumers demanded it. But that started to change around 2005, when YouTube came online and Netflix became increasingly popular. On-demand video became known as data hogs, and evidence began to surface that some providers were manipulating traffic without telling consumers.
By 2010, the FCC enacted open Internet rules, but the agency's legal approach was eventually struck down. FCC officials are hoping to erase the legal ambiguity by no longer classifying the Internet as an "information service" but a "telecommunications service" subject to Title II of the 1934 Communications Act.
That would dramatically expand regulators' power over the industry by requiring providers to act in the public's interest and enabling the FCC to fine companies found to be employing "unreasonable" business practices.
The FCC says it won't apply some sections of Title II, including price controls. That means rates charged to customers for Internet access won't be subject to preapproval. But the law allows the government to investigate if consumers complain that costs are unfair.
Also at stake Thursday was Obama's goal of helping local governments build their own fast, cheap broadband. Chattanooga, Tennessee, and Wilson, North Carolina, have filed petitions with the agency to help override state laws that restrict them from expanding their broadband service to neighboring towns.
The FCC approved these petitions, setting a precedent for other communities that might want to do the same.
Nineteen states place restrictions on municipal broadband networks, many with laws encouraged by cable and telephone companies. Advocates of those laws say they are designed to protect taxpayers from municipal projects that are expensive, can fail or may be unnecessary.
---

GEORGIA: AMATEUR DIVERS FIND LONG-LOST NUCLEAR WARHEAD

GEORGIA: AMATEUR DIVERS FIND LONG-LOST NUCLEAR WARHEAD


Feb262015
 
Georgia: Amateur Divers Find Long-Lost Nuclear Warhead
February 12th, 2015

Savannah| A couple of tourists from London Canada made a surprising discovery while scuba diving  in Wassaw Sound, a small bay  located on the shores of Georgia. Jason Sutter and Christina Murray were admiring the marine life of the area when they stumbled upon a Mark 15 thermonuclear bomb that had been lost by the United States Air Force more than 50 years ago.

The couple from London in Ontario, was on a two week vacation in Georgia and Florida to practise their favorite hobby, scuba diving, when they decided to dive near  the shores of Tybee Island. While admiring the plants and fishes near the sea floor, they noticed a large cylindrical item partially covered by sand. They investigated the object and found out that it was actually a sort of bomb or missile, so they decided to contact the authorities.
“I noticed an object that looked like a metal cylinder, which I thought was an oil barrel” says Jason Sutter. “When I dug it up a bit, I noticed that it was actually a lot bigger and that there was some writing on the side. When I saw the inscription saying that it was a Mk-15 nuclear bomb, I totally freaked out. I caught Chritina by the arm and made signs to tell her we had to leave. We made an emergency ascent, went back to shore and then we called 911.”
The couple is still shocked after their frightening discovery and say they will avoid diving for the rest of their trip.
Rapidly understanding the gravity of the situation, the 911 operator contacted every possible emergency service, including the coast guard and the military, leading to the deployment of more than 20 ships and 1500 men in the area. Using the GPS coordinates given by the couple, they rapidly located the powerful 3.8 megaton bomb.
An unmanned submarine was sent to determine the condition of the bomb, before explosive experts were sent to disarm it. Fortunately, the thermonuclear weapon produced in 1955 seemed in sufficiently good shape for a team of Navy seals  to try to defuse it. They successfully deactivated the warhead after hours of strenuous work, allowing the rest of the bomb to be moved.

The delicate recovery operation took more than 48 hours, but the bomb was finally recovered and transported Mayport Naval Station in Florida. A full set of tests and analysis will now be performed on the warhead to evaluate its actual state and the possible ecological and health hazard that its presence in the bay for 50 years could represent.

bomb3
The federal and state authorities were well-aware that a nuclear warhead had been lost in the area in the 1950′s and had never been recovered, but no efforts had been done for years to recover it. It was lost on the night of February 5, 1958, when a B-47 Stratojet bomber carrying the 7,600-pound hydrogen bomb on a  simulated combat mission off the coast of Georgia collided with an F-86 Saberjet fighter at 36,000 feet of altitude. The collision destroyed the fighter and severely damaged a wing of the bomber, leaving one of its engines partially dislodged.

The bomber’s pilot, Maj. Howard Richardson, was instructed by the Homestead Air Force Base in Florida. to jettison the H-bomb before attempting a landing. Richardson dropped the bomb into the shallow waters of Wassaw Sound, near the mouth of the Savannah River, where he believed the bomb would be swiftly recovered.  The crew did not see an explosion when the bomb struck the sea and they managed to land the B-47 safely at the nearest base.

For the following six weeks, the Air Force looked for the bomb without success. Underwater divers scoured the depths, troops tromped through nearby salt marshes, and a blimp hovered over the area attempting to spot a hole or crater in the beach or swamp. Researches were finally abandoned and the bomb remained hidden for more than 50 years until the unlucky couple stumbled upon it.
Source:  http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/georgia-amateur-divers-find-long-lost-nuclear-warhead/

New HAARP experiment findings released by the American Geophysical Union

New post on Dutchsinse

2/26/2015New HAARP experiment findings released by the American Geophysical Union

by Michael Janitch
As we found out last month, all the bogus stories about HAARP closing down were more fake than a politician kissing a baby during election season.
farmer_haarp082907-1a
When I found the 25 million dollar budget from the US Navy for the Fiscal Year of 2015 -- that sealed the deal on whether or not the facility is still in operation.
Today (February 26 2015), I decided to do a search on plasma experiments authorized for FY2015 and FY2016 by the United States Government.
While searching for budgets, I stumbled upon this NEW February 2015 release from the American Geophysical Union regarding new experiments done at HAARP.
Yes, new experiment results from HAARP.  Submitted January 2015.  This means that all the stories about H.A.A.R.P. being closed down in 2014 were false.

Now move forward to 2015, we have the budget for this year from the US Navy, and we have experiment results coming in from 2014 into 2015 - proving the facility did NOT shut down in 2013, and did not shut down in 2014.
 

Abstract

"Experiments involving the generation and detection of artificial periodic inhomogeneities (API) have been performed at the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) facility.
Irregularities were created using powerful X-mode HF emissions and then probed using short (10μs) X- and O-mode pulses. Reception was performed using a portable software-defined receiver together with the crossed-rhombic antenna from the local ionosonde.
Echoes were observed reliably between about 85-140 km altitude with signal-to-noise ratios as high as about 30 dB. The Doppler shift of the echoes can be associated with the vertical neutral wind in this altitude range.
Small but persistent Doppler shifts were observed. The decay time constant of the echoes is meanwhile indicative of the ambipolar diffusion coefficient which depends on the plasma temperature, composition, and neutral gas density.
The measured time constants appear to be consistent with theoretical expectations and imply a methodology for measuring neutral density profiles.
The significance of thermospheric vertical neutral wind and density measurements which are difficult to obtain using ground-based instruments by other means is discussed."
 
____
  1. This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1002/2015GL063064

Publication History

  1. Accepted manuscript online: 16 FEB 2015 10:24AM EST
  2. Manuscript Revised: 10 FEB 2015
  3. Manuscript Accepted: 10 FEB 2015
  4. Manuscript Received: 7 JAN 2015
_____
_____
 

MEDIA CORRECTION MUST BE MADE!  HAARP is not closed.

 
Big media outlets made false reports last year saying HAARP was closed -- big names such as livescience, RT, and even NBC news jumping on the false information bandwagon.
After reading these nonsense stories about shutdown , I must point out how the disinformation started.
(Literally this was a made up story in 2013 -- at first saying that HAARP was being closed due to "dirty diesel generators"!  This disinformation was debunked in 2013 by myself.    This happened again in 2014 saying HAARP was being dismantled for parts - both false reports from  a HAARP denier website called the ARRL).
Obviously the ARRL is full of the old stuff, and the people who repeated the false shutdown story now must correct themselves.
 
Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from Dutchsinse.
Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

OBAMA: "GO AHEAD! HAVE A VOTE! I WILL VETO!"


 

Obama Dares GOP: Go Ahead!
 ‘Have a Vote on Whether What I’m Doing Is Legal…I Will Veto’
AFTER ALL I AM KING OBOZO....
 
 
By Craig Bannister | 11 hours ago
 
DING A LING Obama is daring Republicans to vote on whether or not his executive actions are legal.
Discussing opposition to his executive amnesty orders at an immigration town hall meeting Wednesday, Obama said he would veto their vote because his actions are “the right thing to do”:
“So in the short term, if Mr. McConnell, the leader of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House, John Boehner, want to have a vote on whether what I’m doing is legal or not, they can have that vote.  I will veto that vote, because I’m absolutely confident that what we’re doing is the right thing to do.”
This man’s arrogance…and dictatorial behavior….is a new phenomenon in American politics.....Many politicians seem to be having a hard time dealing with such overt unconstitutionality…..
 
GO HERE TO SEE 2 VIDEOS ON THIS BLITHERING IDIOT AND ALL THE DUMB ASS PEOPLE THAT ARE IN THE AUDIENCE CLAPPING FOR THIS MORON.....TOTALLY AMAZING!!   THE WHOLE AUDIENCE IS ON FLOURIDE....MAYBE PROZAC...
Obama openly declares he is above the law. Listen to him:

FLOURIDE RESPONSIBLE FOR A MULTITUDE OF HEALTH ISSUES AND IT IS POISON!!!!!

                    
             

(Truthstream Media) A new study out of the UK shows once again just how dangerous water fluoridation is. This time, a look at 98 percent of GP practices found that high rates of underactive thyroid were 30 percent more likely to show up in areas with, surprise surprise, the greatest degree of water fluoridation.


Via Fluoride Action Network:


[The study] found a relatively strong and statistically significant effect, with General Practice (GP) areas being 62% more likely to have high rates of diagnosed hypothyroidism if their drinking water fluoride levels were above 0.7ppm compared to areas with fluoride levels below 0.3ppm.  This was after researchers had accounted for key confounders, which are other factors that influence hypothyroid rates.

Via The Telegraph:


…new research from the University of Kent suggests that there is a spike in the number of cases of underactive thyroid in high fluoride areas such as the West Midlands and the North East of England…
It could mean that up to 15,000 people are suffering needlessly from thyroid problems which can cause depression, weight gain, fatigue and aching muscles.

And that, of course, is just the number of people in those areas studied.


Obviously, artificial water fluoridation is a dangerous and underestimated practice.


If weight gain and depression fit the bill, it might help to explain why the United States – the most fluoridated nation on the planet – is also the world’s most obese as well as the world’s most medicated country, with anti-depressants prescribed more than any other drug. Of course, there are many other factors at play as well.

Underactive thyroid, or hypothyroidism, is a condition where your thyroid doesn’t produce enough hormone. Your thyroid regulates all sorts of processes in your body, including your metabolism, your body temperature, and even your heartbeat. If your thyroid isn’t working properly, your whole body slows down, resulting in a bevy of other health problems the least of which is actually weight gain and fatigue.


Studies have shown that fluoride inhibits iodine, which is necessary to keep your thyroid functioning  On top of that, people don’t realize how many pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides we ingest which also contain fluoride in addition to what’s in our water. In studies, these have shown to negatively impact the pituitary gland as well, a pea-sized gland known as the “master” of our endocrine system that secretes thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH).


“Underactive thyroid is a particularly nasty thing to have and it can lead to other long term health problems. I do think councils need to think again about putting fluoride in the water,” Lead author Professor Stephen Peckham, Centre for Health Service Studies, said.


And again, these researchers like so many before them concluded there are safer ways of improving dental health these days that don’t involve dumping the artificial chemical byproducts of the fertilizer industry into our water supply, but our governments time and again just keep repeating the motto “safe and effective” over and over like the fluoridated zombie robots they are.


Did you know that not only was the flagship World War II Grand Rapids fluoride study “tinkered with” to throw out data showing children who did not drink fluoridated water had healthier teeth, but artificial fluoride’s “healthiness” was actually pushed via a massive government propaganda campaign run by none other than Edward Bernays?


“Almost overnight…the popular image of fluoride – which at the time was being widely sold as rat and bug poison – became that of a beneficial provider of gleaming smiles, absolutely safe, and good for children, bestowed by a benevolent paternal government. Its opponents were permanently engraved on the public mind as crackpots and right-wing loonies.” 

Yes - Bernays, the propaganda king who, among so many other ideas that exploited humanity, convinced women smoking was just a fabulous idea.


Why World War II?


Gee, I don’t know.  Could it have anything to do with the fact that huge quantities of fluoride were necessary to generate the bomb-grade uranium and plutonium essential in atomic bomb production during the Manhattan project? All that excess fluoride waste had to go somewhere… Why not in your water?


Government documents have since been made public which show atomic scientists were secretly ordered to help provide “evidence useful in litigation” against defendants suing over fluoride damage in court. These are the same government scientists who organized studies showing fluoride is “safe and effective.” Can you say “conflict of interest?”


The bottom line isn’t even how obviously false the science was that water fluoridation was based on in the first place. We’ve been lied to and for obvious reasons, that much is on record.
Even before we get to the lies, even looking at water fluoridation superficially, how did we ever accept a program that mass medicates the population via a route that delivers the same amount of chemicals to everyone everywhere without taking into account age, weight, previous medical history, and the amount much a person ingests per day? This isn’t just  ]negligent.  It’s downright stupid.


Think about any medicine ever, right down to vitamins or over-the-counter cough syrup. There are at the very least dosages based on age, right?


How come water fluoridation is some magical process with a chemical that transcends all logic and reason into a one size fits all policy where nothing else ever does?


And that’s before we even get to the rant about how when you drink a glass of water, it only makes contact with the surfaces of your teeth for a brief moment before it is ingested and makes contact with every other system in your body, including your organs and soft tissues. Does everything in your body need to be fluoridated? Does your kidneys, liver, intestines and brain get cavities? It’s not like fluoride, which can cause dental fluorosis, is somehow such a smart molecule it knows it should quarantine itself to only affecting your teeth and nothing else but your teeth.


How we are still dumping artificial fluoride into our water when studies come out again and again showing the deleterious effects of the stuff is beyond me. Fluoride makes people sick and stupid, but beyond that, it’s a poison. It’s poisonous.


How much more proof do you need that a poison is poisonous?
Purify your water. Stop drinking poison.

RECORD US FARMERS SWITCHING (back) TO NON-GMO CROPS



RECORD US FARMERS SWITCHING TO NON-GMO CROPS IN 2015
CONTINUE TO VOTE WITH YOUR DOLLAR!





“Non-GMO is More Profitable”

This is the rising sentiment among farmers of the US as a confluence of factors urges them to become pro-organic. From falling GMO grain prices to a rising tide of public distrust of genetically modified ingredients, failing GMO traits, higher GMO seed prices, and the premium prices that people willingly pay for quality food over toxic junk, the conventional farmer is changing his tune when it comes to Big Ag practices.


Even if profit is the cornerstone on which this change is based, it is still telling. After all, experts project over $35 billion in sales for organic, non-GMO foods in 2015, and as GMO corn, soy and other GM grain prices rise, along with the costs to grow them (associated with more pesticide and herbicide use to control super weeds, for example) farmers are looking past the GMO propaganda which promised higher yields and more cash for farmers who grew their poison crops.


This phenomenon is explained clearly in “The Genetic Engineering of Food and the Failure of Science” (full text available for download here) published in The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food. Gilbert Hostetler, president of Illinois-based Prairie Hybrids commented:
“Our non-GMO seed sales are significantly higher than last year.”
Mac Ehrhardt, president of Minnesota-based Albert Lea Seed, reports that he is selling more conventional (he describes conventional corn as non-GMO) corn seed by the end of November than he did all of last year. He says that farmers are turning to non-GMO to cut costs and to earn more money for their non-GMO yields. Ehrhardt says:
There is a continued increased demand for non-GMO."
His observations are corroborated by Wayne Hoener, vice president of sales for eMerge, an Iowa-based seed company, as well as Tim Daley, an agronomist at Stonebridge, Ltd., an Iowa-based buyer of non-GMO soybeans who are also seeing a marked demand for non-GMO seed by farmers.


Daley says:
Some companies have seen a 50 percent increase in sales of non GMO seed, and some have said they’ve sold more non-GMO seed this year than in the last five.”
Oddly, Morrie Bryant, senior marketing manager at Pioneer Hi-Bred, which sells non-GMO corn and soybean seeds but sells more GMO seeds says he doesn’t see a big difference.
“On (non-GMO) corn, we’ve got a slight increase on sales over last year,” he says. “Non-GMO has emerged as the new niche. It’s about 4-5 percent of total corn production.”
If consumer demand for organic is any indication, farmers would be smart to step up their organic seed purchasing, and ditch Monsanto, Dow and Syngenta seeds completely.


Non-GMO Economics


Farmers find non-GMO seed appealing this year for several reasons, but mostly economics. Grain prices are low with corn selling at about $4 per bushel and soybeans aren’t going for much higher at around $10. Conversely, a premium is being shelled out for non-GMO corn and soybeans.
“(Non-GMO) seed costs less, and there are premiums for non-GMO corn and soybeans in some areas,” Daley says. "Some farmers don’t want to pay technology fees (for GMO seeds) and non-GMO gives them a marketing opportunity,” Bryant says.
Failing GMO Crops


Other farmers are considering the switch because they are tired of super-weeds. One corn breeder who preferred to remain anonymous for a recent interview stated:
“The insect and herbicide traits are losing effectiveness with increased resistant rootworm and weed species. Growers are tired of paying for input costs that are reduced in efficacy and funding additional forms of crop protection.”
Iowa State University weed specialist Bob Hartzler seconds that sentiment in an interview with Iowa Farmer Today.
You have people questioning the value of the Roundup gene. How many are doing it (making the switch) because of that concern, I don’t know.”
Non-GMO Outperform GMO Seeds