Canadian $2 Coin

CURRENCY NEWS FROM CANADA…..

The Royal Canadian Mint has just announced they are going to remove the polar bear from the $2 coin in view of its demise due to global warming!

At the height of political correctness, they will replace it with two gay deer.

The coin will now be called “ two fu#@in’ bucks

Pussification: Toy Gun from 1960’s Would be Banned Today

Regressive left has attempted to instill Americans with sense of fear regarding guns

A toy commercial from the 1960s illustrates exactly how far American society has shifted in recent years on the issue of firearms.

In the television ad from toy-maker Mattel, a young boy fires and reloads one of the most realistic replica revolver pistols ever created, complete with smoke and loud “Bang!” sound effect.

“You are watching a demonstration of the most authentic cap pistol in the world,” an announcer says. “It has exclusive panning action, and shoots safe shooting shells with greenie stickem caps.

“The gun and hip slung Mattel holster are specially made for a fast draw.”

“Every boy will walk tall when he wears a holster and pistol with a Mattel brand,” the ad says.

In modern society, the regressive left has attempted to instill Americans with a sense of fear regarding guns.

The issue has gotten so out-of-hand that some schools have implemented ridiculous zero tolerance policies targeting anything even remotely resembling guns.

Recent cases over the years in which children were punished in school over “gun” incidents (that didn’t even involve a gun) include the infamous Hello Kitty bubble gun ‘terroristic’ incident, the miniature lego gun school bus massacre, the plastic toy soldier holding a gun on a cup cake catastrophe, and the perilous pencil pointing ‘pow powers’ of Virginia.

The extent to which modern liberals are terrified by the inanimate objects reached new heights of absurdity when students at the University of Texas in Austin protested concealed campus carry with sex toys.

The left’s attempt to indoctrinate Americans into fearing firearms is just another indication of the “pussification” of the US, as highlighted recently by Hollywood actor Clint Eastwood.

Homeland Security To Save Us From 'Rigged Elections'?

Why We Should Eliminate the 'Department of Homeland Security'

Let's dismantle the Frankenstein monster and divide its responsibilities more effectively

Matt A Mayer | June 23, 2015

Homeland Security To Save Us From 'Rigged Elections'?  
Or to make sure the cabal's choice 'wins' the election?

The U.S.A. criminal Nazi crime syndicate's creation, Department of Homeland Security, the equivalent of the Nazi SS, makes no secret of its plans to STEAL THE UPCOMING ELECTION.  

The DHS is NOT a valid 'government' department, but a 'sister corporation' spun from the criminal U.S.A. corporation of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, A  CRIME SYNDICATE OPERATING OUT OF Washington, DC.  

America, what are you going to do to insure that the upcoming election is HONEST and that the candidate truly elected by the people is the one to occupy the office? 

DHS and Soros with the help of others are right now putting plans in place to STEAL the upcoming election.   You can safely bet that Hitlery Clinton will be announced - way before the votes have even been cast and counted -  as the 'winner' when all honest polls are showing that Trump is waaaaaaay out in front of Clinton, and that Clinton cannot possibly 'win'. She cannot even draw enough people to her appearances to even rent a room much less acquire enough votes to win.

DHS/UN Announce They Are 

Openly Stealing The Election 

Alex Jones

Alert! DHS To Take Control Of 2016 Election 

After "Foreign Hackers" Breach US Voting System

Homeland Security To Save Us 

From 'Rigged Elections'?

Ron Paul

Why  We  Should  Eliminate  the  Department  of  Homeland  Security

Let's  dismantle  the  Frankenstein  monster  and  divide  its  responsibilities  more effectively.

Matt A Mayer | June 23, 2015

After the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack, President George W. Bush rightly resisted Congress' urge to create a new federal department charged with the homeland security mission. Bush believed the federal government could protect America with a strong homeland security council managed by the White House, similar to the National Security Council. Following relentless pressure, he acquiesced and the federal government gave birth to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on March 1, 2003.

The new department largely consists of agencies and offices pulled from other existing cabinet departments. After twelve years of mediocre-to-poor operations and countless scandals, it is clear President Bush's initial instinct was right. The core functions overseen by DHS can be managed more effectively elsewhere, especially where territorial battles undermine operational efficacy.

It is time to eliminate DHS and put the various components where they are a better fit. Eliminating DHS would result in annual fiscal savings of more than $2.5 billion, with 4,000 fewer employees. Those reductions, however, only represent part of the rationale for eliminating DHS. The other reasons to do so are that DHS is riddled with performance inefficiencies and that its existence creates inefficiencies in other federal entities due to the need to coordinate across organizational boundaries. America can't afford more of the same as terrorist threats reemerge.

With a new President getting elected in a year-and-a-half, starting this discussion now hopefully will spur proponents and opponents to enter the fray, and help presidential candidates to think about how they might more efficiently and effectively protect America during their time in office.

I spent nearly two and a half years at DHS where I first oversaw the terrorism grant, training, and exercise programs for state and local governments under Secretary Tom Ridge. When Michael Chertoff took over, I became the Counselor to the Deputy Secretary on policy and operational issues. My time included the response to Hurricane Katrina. In the nine years since I left DHS, I likely have written more on DHS than just about anyone, including a book, Homeland Security and Federalism: Protecting America from Outside the Beltway.

It goes without saying that I observed up-close the dysfunction, turf battles, and inherent limitations in an entity that does so much. These problems are exacerbated due to the fact that, in many cases, the activities DHS engages in require enormous coordination with entities embedded in other federal departments.

For example, the Transportation Security Administration must continually coordinate with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) given the overlap among their responsibilities. By moving the non-air components to DOT and the air components to the FAA, decisions would be made more quickly and without the turf battles between department heads.

Similarly, with the creation of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Americas' Security Affairs, having the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) outside of the U.S. Department of Defense is nonsensical. Syncing the four military branches that focus on our external threats with the military branch that secures our domestic waterways will enable unified command and control capabilities and streamlined support systems.

Two entities within DHS that would align better elsewhere are U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) and its Ombudsman. USCIS's functions are closely associated with the U.S. Department of State's Bureau of Consular Affairs (BCA). A quick look at their respective mission statements shows how similar the two entities are. The mission of USCIS is:

USCIS will secure America's promise as a nation of immigrants by providing accurate and useful information to our customers, granting immigration and citizenship benefits, promoting an awareness and understanding of citizenship, and ensuring the integrity of our immigration system.

The mission of BCA is:

The mission of the Bureau of Consular Affairs (CA) is to protect the lives and interests of American citizens abroad and to strengthen the security of United States borders through the vigilant adjudication of visas and passports. CA contributes significantly to the USG goal of promoting international exchange and understanding. Our vision is to help American citizens engage the world. The Bureau issues the travel documents that allow Americans to travel the globe and lawful immigrants and visitors to travel to America and provides essential cycle of life services to American citizens overseas.

With such similar missions, what efficiencies and effectiveness measures are gained by having these entities in separate departments? BCA's more extensive mission easily could absorb USCIS's complementary functions.

A final example is the domestic federal law enforcement functions within U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Those two entities consistently must coordinate with numerous elements at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), including: the Federal Bureau of Investigation; the Drug Enforcement Administration; the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives; and the U.S. Attorneys. By having those entities under a separate cabinet official, the opportunity for turf battles and arbitrage are heightened.

Equally problematic is the multi-headed hydra faced by state and local law enforcement. With a large portion of state and local terrorism funding residing at DHS and ICE's existence in the department, state and local law enforcement must contend with multiple intelligence entities (DHS' weak fusion centers, DOJ's Joint Terrorism Task Forces, and the FBI's Field Intelligence Groups), coordinating bodies, and funding offices. This fragmentation only ensures that key items will fall through the cracks between these departments, whose personnel spend far too much time fighting each other for primacy than they should. Our enemies couldn't ask for a more fertile environment within which to attack us.

During my time at DHS, I unfortunately spent too much time fending off fiefdom building efforts by Michael Brown and his staff at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) over the $3.5 billion terrorism grant programs that I ran and Brown wanted. During the transition from Secretary Ridge to Secretary Chertoff, Brown and I engaged in a running debate over whether preparedness functions should reside outside or inside of FEMA. I won the debate when Secretary Chertoff keep the terrorism preparedness functions outside of FEMA.

At the time, I focused on the importance of protecting terrorism preparedness operations from the constant operational natural disaster response and recovery tempo of FEMA. I made the case that terrorism preparedness operations tended to wither on the vine because FEMA needed to divert resources to ensure successful responses to natural disasters. With the ever-increasing natural disaster declarations coming out of FEMA since 1993, I had real concerns in our post-9/11 environment that terrorism would play second fiddle to the nationalization of natural disasters.

In the congressional actions after Hurricane Katrina, FEMA finally got the terrorism preparedness functions it had long sought. Though it's hard to admit, I have to concede that combining the preparedness, response, and recovery elements in FEMA hasn't resulted in terrorism preparedness getting weakened. That doesn't mean it has improved, either. Much of FEMA's recent success is due to the excellent leadership of FEMA Administrator Craig Fugate combined with the limited number of major natural disasters during the Obama Administration. The experience of the FEMA Administrator is clearly critical to its operational success.

In fact, given how often the FEMA Administrator interacts with the President, creating a layer of secretarial management between the two makes little sense. Having the FEMA Administrator report, instead, directly to the president is especially important because it simply reflects the reality of what happens anyway when a major natural disaster strike America. FEMA should once again become a stand-alone agency. That said, the terrorism-related grants, training, and exercise programs should revert back to DOJ, thereby strengthening the connection among domestic terrorism entities in federal, state, and local governments.

As for the U.S. Secret Service, its main mission is:

to ensure the security of our President, our Vice President, their families, the White House, the Vice President's Residence, national and visiting world leaders, former Presidents, and events of national significance. The Secret Service also protects the integrity of our currency and investigates crimes against our national financial system committed by criminals around the world and in cyberspace.

Given that very specific mission, the Director should report directly to the person his agency is charged with protecting. Perhaps the scandals and failures of the last few years are due to the agency's lost standing incumbent with being placed in the bowels of a department. It is hard to think that reporting directly to the president will not up the accountability level.

Beyond the fiscal savings of eliminating inefficient and, at times, ineffective layers of management, operations should improve. Things certainly couldn't get worse. As DHS Inspector General and U.S. Government Accountability Office reports over the last twelve years unequivocally demonstrate, DHS has not been a model of success. To boot, surveys of personnel consistently show that DHS employees have the lowest morale in the 'federal government'.

As the saying goes, when you find yourself in a hole, it is wise to stop digging. Good intentions led to creating a new cabinet department with 180,000 employees and a nearly $38 billion budget that has ballooned to 240,000 employees and a $61 billion budget. Those increases represent a 33 percent jump in employees and a 61 percent budgetary explosion in just 12 years. More people and money did not result in better outcomes.

My proposed reorganization may not be correct on all counts, but it would be better than the status quo. Spending another decade allowing a department to grow even larger while it continues to get weak results will only ensure it becomes yet another permanent, and ineffective, federal bureaucracy. We can and should do better. 

President Bush instinctively had it right. It's now time we fix what politics got wrong.

http://reason.com/archives/2015/06/23/president-bush-was-right-before-he-was-w

It is past time to rid ourselves of the Nazi facist regime and return our nation and government to its original Republic and common law.

 

 

David Oates, provides reverse speech of 3 Hillary Clinton campaign appearances

Reverse speech analyst, David Oates, provides reverse speech of 3 Hillary Clinton campaign appearances

Reverse Speech Analysis of Hillary Clinton

at the DNC July 2016

 

Reverse Speech Analysis of Hillary Clinton

in San Diego June 2 2016  

 

Reverse Speech of Sanders

Endorsing Clinton

July 12 2016

Agenda 21, The Plan To Kill You - David Icke

 

The United Nations Depopulation Plan

Agenda 21, The Plan To Kill You 

David Icke

David Icke : ISIS - Made in America

ISIS,  MADE  IN  AMERICA   The  David  Icke  Videocast

Friday, September 2, 2016 10:20

 

  

 

 

ISIS - Made in America

 

 

 

Mainstream Media Admits It May “Never Recover” from 2016 Election

Link: http://theantimedia.org/mainstream-media-admits-never-recover-2016-election/

Carey Wedler

(ANTIMEDIA) In a revealing statement that flew largely under the radar earlier this month, the mainstream media admitted it would never recover from its irresponsible and negligent coverage of the 2016 presidential election. A recent column published in the New York Post referred to the media’s reporting as “the complete collapse of American journalism as we know it.”

In his article for the Post, Fox News contributor Michael Goodwin discussed the media’s pro-Clinton bias – one recognized by supporters of virtually every other presidential candidate, from Bernie Sanders to Jill Stein to Gary Johnson and, of course, Donald Trump. Even Americans who don’t necessarily have a horse in the 2016 race notice the slant.

“By torching its remaining credibility in service of Clinton,” Goodwin wrote, “the mainstream media’s reputations will likely never recover, nor will the standards. No future producer, editor, reporter or anchor can be expected to meet a test of fairness when that standard has been trashed in such willful and blatant fashion.”

Indeed, he is correct in this regard. The Clinton machine has effectively infiltrated corporate media. Last year, the Intercept reported MSNBC failed to disclose that multiple pundits who spoke favorably about Clinton were actually employees of a consulting firm hired by her campaign.

More recently, embarrassing DNC leaks released in July revealed DNC officials attempted to craft narratives painting Sanders in a negative light to undermine his campaign. They also organized a secret fundraiser with the Washington Post and were careful to keep it under the radar. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, the now-disgraced former chairman of the DNC, along with one of her colleagues, personally contacted MSNBC to complain when one of its anchors criticized Clinton and suggested she drop out. Per a “deal” with the DNC, one POLITICO writer sent an article critical of Clinton to the DNC for suggestions before he sent it to his editor.

Though Goodwin has previously implied he does not support the Republican nominee, he still argues “Any reporter who agrees with Clinton about Trump has no business covering either candidate.”

There is no question the mainstream media has sided with the political establishment in its decision to craft narratives that paint Clinton as a competent leader who is the only option in the face of a catastrophic Trump presidency. Indeed, in spite of Clinton’s lack of popularity among the general population, the media continues to suggest she is the only thing standing between America and its descent into fascism.

 

While the degree of negative press Trump has received is undeniably staggering, Goodwin failed to recognize — at least in this article — that like Clinton, Trump is wildly unpopular and dangerous. Though mainstream media is undoubtedly fervent in their coverage of Trump’s absurdity, it is arguably irresponsible not to point out the gaping problems with his xenophobic, violent, non-factual rhetoric.
But therein lies the problem: rarely does the mainstream media devote as much time to questioning Hillary Clinton, her rhetoric, and her policies. As the Hill noted earlier this month:

“Some would argue that Trump deserves it because of controversial rhetoric or falsehoods around X, Y, Z… [But] when looking at honesty/trustworthy numbers, it’s Clinton who — in the eyes of the public — has more issues in that department.”

As Politifact documented, Clinton has lied on multiple occasions, and the media’s lack of outrage and refusal to focus on her dishonesty lends credence to Goodwin’s assertions.

Goodwin’s rhetoric is openly right-wing, though he voted for Obama in 2008 and in 2012 claimed to be a Democrat. He appears regularly on Fox News and has previously asserted President Obama is not doing enough to combat Islamic extremism. And though he is correct in pointing out the pro-Clinton bias, his employment at the New York Post and ongoing appearances on Fox — two icons of mainstream media — obliterate any chance of his media criticisms being taken seriously.

The New York Post has been owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. since 1976. In that time, the Post has developed a reputation forsensationalism and inaccurate reporting. While they deserve mild credit for covering controversial issues like police brutality and the secrecy and corruption surrounding the infamous 28-pages of the 9/11 commission report, a long line of ethical controversies mars their credibility — so much so that even a Fox News anchor has questioned the paper’s legitimacy.

Little needs to be said about Fox News’ out of touch, delusional take on the world, though it is worth noting that according to an analysis by Politifact, 58 percent of Fox News’ content is mostly false, false, or “pants on fire.”
The reputations of the New York Post and Fox News precede Goodwin’s argument, no matter how true it may be that the media is in Hillary Clinton’s pocket. What his assertion should have contended is that American journalism was a lost cause long before the 2016 election — something Americans have increasingly and rightfully begun to recognize.

From the corporate media’s flagrantly irresponsible coverage of the Iraq War during the Bush years to the media’s ongoing blackouts of relevant news in favor of more superficial, inconsequential stories, Goodwin’s assertion that 2016 is the year American journalism died is as factual as the content churned out by Fox News.

2016 has merely been its funeral procession.

"I thought you should know"

FBI Just Made a Massive Move Against Hillary Clinton

SURPRISE!  BREAKING  NEWS!  FBI  JUST  MADE  A  MASSIVE  MOVE  AGAINST  HILLARY  CLINTON!

 

 

Kosar
Featured Contributor

The Political Insider
 
In recent weeks, the State Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) have been pushing against each other over FOIA requests for details of Hillary Clinton’s criminal investigation.

While the FBI, for political reasons, ultimately decided not to prosecute, they did have an extensive investigation into the corruption at the Clinton Foundation and Secretary of State’s office, where Hillary Clinton sold access to foreign donors.

The State Department wants records to be delayed until after the election. But now, the FBI will officially release their full report to the Justice Department, including investigative materials and additional notes no one has seen before.

This is bad news for Hillary!

The release is in response to numerous FOIA requests including from CNN.

Also to be released is Hillary Clinton’s 302, the FBI agent notes from Clinton’s voluntary interview at FBI headquarters. The report is about 30 pages, and the 302 is about a dozen pages according to the officials.[…]

Last month, FBI Director James Comey recommended against charges for Clinton for her use of a private email server while she was secretary of state, but he did describe her behavior as “extremely careless” with classified material.

Via CNN
While the liberal media is on Hillary Clinton’s side, she won’t be able to hide from these new details surrounding her pay-to-play corruption at the State Department. Many sources inside the intelligence community are furious that no charges were filed, because Hillary Clinton’s crimes are actually worse than has been reported. Now, we will find out the truth.

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/hillary-fbi-just-made-massive-move-against-clinton/?utm_source=SailThru%26utm_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=TPI%20Newsletter%2009-02-16%20Friday%20Best%20of%20Week&utm_term=New%20Friday%20Active%20Users

2nd amendment

Hermine looms as first hurricane to make landfall in Florida in 11 years

Hermine is bearing down on Florida and will deliver heavy rain, gusty winds, flooding and the risk of tornadoes into Friday.
The storm became a Category 1 hurricane shortly before 3 p.m. EDT Thursday.
The last hurricane to make landfall in Florida was Wilma in 2005.
This is a closeup live loop of Hermine. (NOAA/Satellite)
The center of Hermine has made the anticipated northeastward turn and is located about 20 miles southeast of Apalachicola, Florida, and 95 miles west of Cedar Key, Florida.
"We expect Hermine make landfall north of Tampa, in the Big Bend of Florida during late Thursday night into early Friday morning," according to AccuWeather Hurricane Expert Dan Kottlowski.

In advance of the storm, Florida Gov. Rick Scott declared a State of Emergency to help 51 counties prepare. A mandatory evacuation notice has been issued for Franklin County, located along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico on the Florida Panhandle.
Several Florida schools have announced closings on Thursday or Friday due to the storm. Florida State University's main campus in Tallahassee, Florida, will be closed from noon Thursday into Friday, officials announced Thursday morning. University of South Florida in Tampa will also be closed on Friday.
Some airlines are waving flight change fees in the path of the storm.
The storm will unload a general 4-8 inches of rain with locally 12-18 inches possible. This rainfall is enough to cause urban and low-lying area flooding.
Near and just south of the center of Hermine, onshore winds will push Gulf of Mexico water landward and are likely to cause coastal flooding. Major cities that can be affected by coastal flooding include Tampa and St. Petersburg, Florida, even if the storm makes landfall 100 miles or more to the north.
In addition to the risk of flooding, locally severe thunderstorms will have the potential to bring damaging wind gusts. Near and shortly after the storm makes landfall, there will be a significant risk of waterspouts and tornadoes being spawned in central and northern Florida.

Florida cities that will be at risk for tornadoes include Tampa, Orlando, Ocala, The Villages, Melbourne, Gainesville, Jacksonville, Daytona Beach and Tallahassee.
The risk of isolated tornadoes will extend northeastward into parts of Georgia and the Carolinas into Friday.
People in the central and northern part of the Florida Peninsula and the eastern part of the Florida Panhandle should be prepared for tropical storm to minimal hurricane conditions with power outages, flooded roads and airline disruptions.
Sea and surf conditions will be dangerous along the Florida west coast into Friday and along the upper east coast Thursday night into Saturday.
RELATED:
Hermine may ruin East Coast Labor Day weekend plans
2016 US Open: Will Hermine disrupt play this weekend?
REPORTS: Hurricane Hermine bears down on Florida
After traversing the Florida Peninsula on Thursday night, the storm will continue northeastward across part of Georgia on Friday. In this position, rough surf, gusty winds and heavy rains will lash coastal areas.

The storm is likely to bring a period of torrential rainfall and raise the risk of flash and urban flooding over portions of Georgia and the Carolinas, despite prior dryness issues. The risk of power outages will continue on a sporadic level. Coastal flooding is also likely.
Significant impact from Hermine will not be limited to the southeastern U.S.
Beyond the Carolinas on Saturday, Hermine may ruin coastal Northeast Labor Day weekend plans.

Revolution Rising: Colossal Protests Rock Socialist Venezuela

Millions rise up against socialism

Anti-socialist protesters flooded Venezuela’s capital in one of the largest mass protests against President Nicolas Maduro’s rule in over a decade – and one of the largest protests in world history.

Revolution Rising: Colossal Protests Rock Socialist Venezuela https://t.co/wUPWIZZBtW @DRUDGE #tcot #altright @mises pic.twitter.com/ALyNySnKEa

— Kit Daniels (@KitDaniels1776) September 2, 2016

Chanting “this government will fall,” millions rallied across Caracas to demand a recall referendum against Maduro amid the crippling economy in the OPEC country.
“We are going to bring down Maduro!” said Naty Gutierrez, 53, who persevered 75 miles of military roadblocks to reach the protest. “We are going to defeat hunger, crime, inflation and corruption.”
“They’ve done nothing in 17 years.”
She was surrounded by thousands of people waving banners and national flags.
Protesters poured into Caracas from all across the country, according to the Democratic Unity coalition, which opposes the ruling party.
Hyperinflation, multiple years of recession, shortages of basic goods and long lines at stores have destroyed the lives of Venezuela’s 30 million people.
“As F.A. Hayek could have predicted decades ago, continued state control of economic activities in Venezuela had led to increasing control of the private life of everyone, and so it happened in Venezuela,” economist Iván Carrino of the Mises Institute wrote. “Authoritarianism, already running at high levels, grew even bigger, and today not only are there political prisoners such as Leopoldo López, but also businessmen who are imprisoned and persecuted for being suspected of causing an ‘economic war’ that seeks to undermine the government.”
“The truth is that a boundless government has spent well beyond its means, issuing currency without control to cover budget deficits. After that, when inflation came, the Venezuelan state decided not only to control currency prices but every price in the economy, creating shortages in basic services and giving rise to what is now a humanitarian crisis.”
However, the people finally won a decisive opposition win in a December legislative vote.
Maduro’s opposition hopes the protests will heap pressure on the Venezuelan government to allow a direct vote on his rule, granted by the constitution half-way through a presidential term.
If Maduro loses, new elections would be held and polls indicate the opposition would win. But if a vote is delayed until after Jan. 10, and Maduro loses, his vice president would finish his term ending in 2019.
Maduro was quick to respond to the unrest.
“If they’re coming with coups, ambushes and political violence, the revolutionary will provide an uncommon and overwhelming response,” he told supporters, adding that his opponents are plotting a coup like the one that briefly toppled his mentor Hugo Chavez in 2002.
He claimed authorities had arrested people wearing military fatigues and C4 explosives who planned to fire upon the crowds dressed as National Guard members, but his claim is likely false and intended to demonize the protesters.
But instead of discouraging Venezuelans’ enthusiasm, the saber-rattling rhetoric appears to be energizing the opposition, said Dimitris Pantoulas, a political analyst from Caracas.
“The government made a big mistake by throwing fuel onto the flames,” he said, adding that
had the government minimized the protest’s importance it would have likely failed to garner much support.
Firmly in power since Hugo Chavez took office in 1999, the socialists are losing power
due to collapsing oil prices and the failing state-run economy that has left the country in chaos.


Source:  http://www.infowars.com/revolution-rising-colossal-protests-rock-socialist-venezuela/

The Clintons and The Clinton Foundation: ONE MAN'S OPINIONS

THE  CLINTONS  AND  THE  CLINTON  FOUNDATION:  ONE  MAN'S  OPINIONS


ONE MAN'S OPINIONS as shared with us via private email:

September 1, 2016 8:41 PM

 

It never ends for the Clintons, but what it does do is expose the sheer scale of criminality of what passes for a 'Government' in Cabal rotten USA.

 

Clinton emails are not the real problem. It’s the Clinton Foundation funneling money illegally to not just the Clintons, but much of our 'government'. See how it works...a preview of leaks to come...

 

From an FBI insider - a sad state of affairs.  FBI insider confirms everyone’s worst suspicions.  The Hillary Clinton e-mail server was merely a distraction from the Clinton Foundation, and most of Washington, D.C. is in up to their necks in what could be the biggest scandal of all times.  This inside info comes from someone claiming to be a high level FBI analyst whose job was to look at the records, with his notes added.

 

'The smoking gun is about to arrive and there are "a lot of people involved".

 

To save everyone time, what follows here are the choice bits:

·        Looks like Trump and Putin hold some of the cards.

·        This could be the most interesting election ever.

 

There is intense pressure within the FBI for us not to indict Hillary. I am posting from a position of near anonymity and enough plausible deniability to evade prosecution, as we have all been given gag orders.  There is enough for Hillary and the entire government to be brought down.  People do not realize how enormous this whole situation actually is.

 

Whether she will be indicted or not depends on how much info about others involved gets out, and there are a lot of people involved. The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the e-mail server. We received the server from Benghazi, then from the server we found data on the Clinton Foundation. Then we realized the situation is much worse than previously thought.

 

Super Classified Materials on the Clinton Email Server: Hillary had Special Access Programs on her server which, if made public, would literally cause an uprising and possibly foreign declarations of war.

 

A Special Access Program is an intelligence program classified above 'top-secret'. These programs are supposed to be held on closed servers at secret locations. The only way to get one is if you are specifically read on to a program, have a 'need to know', then you must physically go to a location and pass through several layers of security to even look at the program. A good example in non-classified terms would be the locations and operations of our intelligence operatives around the globe, or our missile silo locations.

 

A Bigger Problem than Hillary: Killing Hillary would not cause this problem to go away.  The problem is with the Clinton Foundation as I mentioned, which you should just imagine as a massive spider web of connections and money laundering, implicating hundreds of high-level people. Though I do not have a high opinion of Hillary, she is just a piece - albeit a big piece – of this massive shit-storm. Legal is asking preliminary questions about whether or not she has been coached (she has) and setting up the general line of questioning. I am a high level analyst though, so my job is only to look at her records.

   

The Department of Justice is most likely looking to save itself...find everyone involved in the Clinton Foundation, from its donors to its Board of Directors, and imagine they are all implicated.

  

The ENTIRE 'government' is involved. My opinion is the entire 'government' is guilty of treason, which is why Hillary's death would not cease the investigation or prevent further scandals. Many, many people are involved.

 

There already is enough to indict. FBI Director Comey has been trying to stall because he does not want to face the Clinton Machine, as well as the rest of Washington D.C.  But this case would explode into a million other cases if fully brought to light, and then we would be one agency competing against the entire 'government' and a hoard of other interests. 

 

It is a very tense and uncomfortable position.  What Attorney General Loretta Lynch is saying is she will accept whatever they do and make her determination as she will. Nothing about her responsibilities has changed; she is simply trying to keep her hide intact.

 

Foreign powers have some of the documents.  Trump has some of the documents.  Russia Will Probably Leak All Info they Have.  Foreign powers  are in possession of some of the documents we have analyzed because they were hacked from the Clinton server. Trump has some files as well and likely plans to leak them and use them to his advantage soon. The leaks will have to be made in a non-transparent fashion. If we recommend, we literally hand over documentation implying the entire 'government' is involved in treason at the highest levels and everyone is about to duck and cover, as well as some sensitive details of Special Access Programs which would obliterate national security. 

 

I am not sure, but some of my war strategy buddies are estimating a high probability that Russia will leak all of the info they have to the world, since Clinton wants to go to war with them and they have no desire to be in conflict with the U.S.   If we do not recommend, it will look like a cover-up and Trump will use the perception to bolster his message. I did work in PsyOps once, and Trump’s use of confirmation bias is legendary.

 

Bill Clinton Will Likely Die This Year.  If Trump Wins, Hillary Goes to Jail.  Everything is Corrupt.  Even Trump is Dirty. The entire 'government' is corrupt. No one is clean, not even Trump. Trump has donated to the Clinton Foundation in the past, though for fairly innocuous things like building permits and such. He is smart, so his tracks are covered well but if any prosecutor wants to go very in-depth, Trump would be brought on bribery charges. He could easily get out of them, but he would be charged nonetheless. 

 

We have our hands tied. My message to you and everyone on this board is do not get distracted by Clinton’s e-mails. Focus on the Foundation. All of the nightmarish truth is there. The e-mails will pale in comparison. I do not know of Trump’s record, but from the case he definitely knew to limit his exposure and make it only look like a donation.

 

A Multitude of Scandals.  Saudi Arabia visits and donates to the Clinton Foundation. Russian Uranium fiasco. Hillary and the Israel lobby, the Council on Foreign Relations. AIPAC. The list is endless.

 

Three Choices – Could Crash Everything. I will put it to you this way: You have three choices.....

A) Turn over all of the information to the Department of Justice, make public a recommendation, the truth comes out, the entire world realizes how much the U.S. is meddling in foreign affairs and we go to war, the civilian population realizes how much foreign money influences our 'government', and a civil war begins.  

B) You cherry-pick the data to implicate the people already in the eye of public opinion, so the chips fall on the heads of a select few and the whole system does not crash.   

C) You do nothing and watch the unstable political climate to gauge how you will respond.  I am confident if Trump wins, Hillary will be going to jail.

 

The Problem is the Entire 'Government'.  FBI Director Comey will likely resign in any case. FBI is being very quiet for a reason; most of us want to keep our jobs. Snowden has nothing to do with any of this.  Obama and Hillary do hate each other. Hillary hates black people and Obama dislikes recklessness. The problem is with the entire 'government'. Hillary is just one component of that government.

 

Hillary sold Safe Access Programs to Overseas "Donors". All I can tell you about the Safe Access Programs is Hillary had them, and she did not have proper authority to have any of them. They were leaked to her by someone, and she did sell them to overseas donors.  Possessing them alone makes her guilty of treason. Obama is loosely tied to the Clinton Foundation, but much more tied in with the same people who donate to the Clinton Foundation.

 

Russian borders, Ukraine, everywhere NATO is, the South China Sea, the Philippines, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Africa. George Soros is at the heart of all of this. If it comes down to it, I would fight. But most of us are of the opinion that Hillary will not be president, and having Trump in office makes our job that much easier. But right now we have to carefully wade through the mud.  As I stated before, Bill Clinton likely wanted Loretta Lynch to focus on the e-mail server and shy away from prosecuting the foundation. We will go to war with Russia and possibly China if Hillary wins the election. Needless to say if anyone has any doubts about the validity of the above info, it stands to reason that the originator of this info has to conceal his identity as anyone present at the FBI hearings was sworn to secrecy and leaking any info would at least cost him his job and most likely some jail time to boot and, at the worst scenario, someone probably would put a contract out on him.

 

Most of us know, at least the ones who have paid any attention to politics, know that in the past anyone who in some way or another has crossed the Clinton's has met an unexplainable early demise and I believe Vince Foster was no exception.

   

Some other content in this report appears to re-enforce its validity as, whoever penned it, did not make out Trump as just an innocent bystander as even he used bribes whenever he thought it to be necessary to get approval for one of his many projects. Even so bribes should never be the road one has to embarked on, but in retrospect considering everything else whatever he has done pales in comparison with what The Clinton Foundation is guilty of along with many other entities within our 'government'.

    

Many of the younger generation leaning towards socialism, liberalism or maybe prefer to be called 'progressives' as it doesn't sound as harsh as being called a 'socialist' may refute or maybe skeptical of the validity of the above, but should keep the following in mind. The kind of socialism as it is being practiced and being preached now is a far cry from what it was during the days of Kennedy, as over time socialism has become quite radical and rather rabid as well with no holds barred and just about anything will go as long as it achieves the desired goal. If Kennedy, who was a liberal, would show up today, democrats undoubtedly would make every attempt to run him out of town accusing him to be a conservative.

 

After considering and digesting the article you just have read, you may want to give some serious thought who you are going to vote for, as I believe a 'government' which is less than honest is not in the best interest of the public and in the long run is doomed to fail, like many others before have.

 

Once again the addition to the above report is just my personal take on this situation which may not be easy to resolve in a peaceful and quiet manner. I just hope that there are still enough wise and honest people left within the current regime who are willing to step up to the plate and somehow settle this issue without doing permanent damage to this once Great Nation.

 

--- End ---

 

Political posters that 'CONNECT ALL THE DOTS' !

CLINTON FOUNDATION CAN BRING DOWN ENTIRE 'GOVERNMENT'!

FBI  SOURCE:   CLINTON  FOUNDATION  CAN  BRING  DOWN  ENTIRE  'GOVERNMENT'!

The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the email servers, source reveals

Kit Daniels - July 7, 2016

 

 

The Clinton Foundation is a “massive spider web of connections and money laundering implicating hundreds of high-level people,” according to an anonymous insider who revealed why the FBI stopped short of indicting Hillary Clinton.

Before FBI Director James Comey announced the FBI wouldn’t recommend pressing charges against Clinton, an insider with “intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case” hosted a little-publicized AMA session on 4Chan, and the statements he made on July 2 corroborate with later developments of the scandal.

“There is enough for her and the entire government to be brought down,” he revealed. “People do not realize how enormous this whole situation actually is.”

“Whether she will be [indicted] or not depends on how much info others involved gets out, and there are a lot of people involved.”

Since then, both the FBI and the DOJ declined to press charges against Clinton, and other sources revealed the Clinton Foundation is now under scrutiny.

“The problem is with the Clinton Foundation as I mentioned, which you should just imagine as a massive spider web of connections and money laundering implicating hundreds of high-level people,” the source said. “Though I do not have a high opinion of Hillary, she is just a piece – albeit a big piece – of this massive sh*tstorm.” 

Those implicated extends to the Justice Dept. “The DOJ is most likely looking to save itself,” he continued.  “Find everyone involved in the Clinton Foundation, from its donors to its Board of Directors, and imagine they are all implicated.”

This would explain why Bill Clinton forced himself on Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s plane at the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport last week.  Clinton insider Larry Nichols said blackmail was likely involved.

“Bill Clinton met with Lynch, and he was there to assure her that, when Hillary gets to be president, she’ll be able to keep her job,” said Nichols on the Alex Jones Show Friday. “I would imagine he gave Lynch a slip of paper that had on it a couple of things about the career prosecutors that are working the case. What was on that? The things they have on them. The drugs, women, men, whatever.”

The source indicated the Clinton Foundation is likely a nexus of blackmail material keeping everyone in D.C. in line behind the Clintons – even those with tremendous influence.  “The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the email server,” he said. “We  received the server from Benghazi, then from the server we found data on the Clinton Foundation.” “Then we realized the situation is much worse than previously thought.”

The server was in Benghazi? Was that one of the reasons why the embassy was attacked, to destroy evidence on the Clinton Foundation?

Interestingly, the insider spoke more about Clinton’s relationship with President Obama, which seems frosty at times despite Obama currently campaigning for his former Secretary of State. “Obama and Hillary do hate each other,” he said. “Hillary hates black people and Obama dislikes recklessness.”

On Thursday, Breitbart reported the FBI is “is still investigating Hillary Clinton in connection with possible corruption related to the Clinton Foundation.”

http://www.infowars.com/fbi-source-clinton-foundation-can-bring-down-entire-government/