Obama Ignores Nullification, Says Federal Agents Will
Enforce Obamacare
In a move that reminiscent of the tyrannical
actions of Abraham Lincoln that led to the War of Northern Aggression, Barack
Obama says that he will not wait on states to enforce Obamacare. Instead his
administration has announced its intent is to completely disregard the
state’s Tenth Amendment rights to nullification of the Obamacare law, via
their passed legislation and state constitutions. In fact, his administration
has said that in states where they refuse to comply with federal healthcare
mandates that agents from the Department of Health and Human Services will
assume absolute control over the state’s health insurance industry. Politico reports, Insurance regulation is a huge responsibility that’s been closely guarded by the states. That’s why the Obama administration and those closely watching the rollout of Obamacare believe that even states that have sworn off the law’s coverage expansions will still enforce its new measures — including new benefit mandates, cost-sharing guidelines and rules on how insurers rate customers — to retain control over their health insurance markets. But the feds will be overseeing the health care law in Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas and Wyoming after those states told HHS they couldn’t or wouldn’t implement the new rules. “We are enforcing because Oklahoma notified … that it has not enacted legislation to enforce or that it is otherwise not enforcing the Affordable Care Act market reform provisions,” Gary Cohen, director of the federal Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, wrote to the Oklahoma Insurance Department on Friday. Officials in Missouri, Texas and Wyoming received similar letters, an agency spokeswoman said. The enforcement letters come a little more than a month after a Commonwealth Fund report found just 11 states and Washington had started to adjust state laws to prepare for seven major ACA insurance reforms taking effect in 2014. In a statement by Oklahoma Insurance Commissioner John Doak he said, “It is unfortunate that health insurers are being forced into a system of dual regulation by the overreaching Obama administration. My position on this has never wavered, and I welcome every opportunity to try to overturn Obamacare.” In a letter sent to Cohen, it was clearly stated that the Oklahoma Insurance Department does not have the authority to enforce federal law. “The Oklahoma Insurance Department regulates the health insurance policies sold in the state and responds to consumer questions and complaints. Our consumer assistance team receives over 30,000 phone calls and our website receives over 1,000,000 visits each year,” the letter said. “We will continue to serve these consumers by adhering to our duties under the State Constitution and Statutes. The consumers are the ones who are going to bear the costs of these unnecessary federal regulatory burdens.” The Tulsa World reports: Meanwhile, health insurance companies doing business in Oklahoma are receiving letters from Cohen telling them that enforcement of the law’s requirements will be handled by the federal agency. A state health insurance trade group said the additional level of regulation is troubling. “The Oklahoma Association of Health Plans’ members are very concerned about the impact dual regulations will have on administrative expenses and premiums paid by our consumers,” said Executive Director Laura Brookins. Essentially, health coverage that will be sold through a federally run health insurance exchange starting next year will be regulated by the federal government, but coverage outside the exchange — sold by the same companies — will face different rules, forms and officials. “Unfortunately for everyone, this dual oversight process will result in increased costs for all Oklahoma health plans,” Brookins said. Doaks warns that this additional level of regulation, or duplicate regulatory scheme will result in increased costs to the consumer. “Oklahomans should be alarmed,” he said. Deputy insurance Commissioner Mike Rhoads says the two regulatory structures will simply make things needlessly confusing. “Since statehood we’ve been doing this and frankly we’re the … experts in the regulatory matters,” Rhoads said. “I’m not going to say that they can’t do it, but they damned sure can’t do it as efficiently as we can.” Joe Wolverton at The New American writes, (more on link) |
3 comments:
How can a criminal with forged documents enforce anything?? We don't even know what his real name is. I WON'T DO IT!!!!! i DO NOT CONSENT!!!
And quite a few believed he is a lightworker. Put in office by cabal bankers know full well his birth record in question authorized countless criminal activities attacked on Libya and so on. Jesus came as servant went face to face with the dark Jewish leadership in Jerusalem appointed by the Romans like speaking at the state of the union address, got everybody's attention speaking forth the truth which non couldn't handle except the meek the poor etc. He was crucify without any iota of crime committed. Obama is no match.
Obama ignores Nullification at his own legal risk. When his agents are languishing in jail and he has to argue with the 14th Amendment against the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of `98, the Courts will be forced to rein him in. The Supremacy Clause has absolutely nothing to do with Obamacare or gun control or marijauna criminalization.The Tenth Amendment Center would love the opportunity to file briefs with courts in these respects. Unfortunately for the Feds, the 14th Amendment is at serious risk for working Corruption of Blood and multigenerational Forfeiture for Treason. These are specifically prohibited by the Constitutional Convention itself. Too bad, let the fight begin! As Moses said, "Let my people go!"
Post a Comment