Friday, March 28, 2014

AMERICAN JUDICIARY ACT OF 1789: Law of Admirality SUPREMECY CLAUSE 1-9 CL. 2 (scans)

To: "V. K. Durham"  
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 6:09:42 PM
Subject: AMERICAN JUDICIARY ACT OF 1789:  Law of Admirality SUPREMECY CLAUSE 1-9 CL. 2  (scans)


 Law of Admirality SUPREMECY CLAUSE 1-9 CL. 2  (scans)

The Judiciary Act of 1789
September 24, 1789.
1 Stat. 73.

CHAP. XX. – An Act to establish the Judicial Courts of the United States.

SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the supreme court of the United States shall consist of a chief justice and five associate justices, any four of whom shall be a quorum, and shall hold annually at the seat of government two sessions, the one commencing the first Monday of February, and the other the first Monday of August. That the associate justices shall have precedence according to the date of their commissions, or when the commissions of two or more of them bear date on the same day, according to their respective ages.

SEC. 2. And be it further enacted, That the United States shall be, and they hereby are divided into thirteen districts, to be limited and called as follows, to wit: one to consist of that part of the State of Massachusetts which lies easterly of the State of New Hampshire, and to be called Maine District; one to consist of the State of New Hampshire, and to be called New Hampshire District; one to consist of the remaining part of the State of Massachusetts, and to be called Massachusetts district; one to consist of the State of Connecticut, and to be called Connecticut District; one to consist of the State of New York, and to be called New York District; one to consist of the State of New Jersey, and to be called New Jersey District; one to consist of the State of Pennsylvania, and to be called Pennsylvania District; one to consist of the State of Delaware, and to be called Delaware District; one to consist of the State of Maryland, and to be called Maryland District; one to consist of the State of Virginia, except that part called the District of Kentucky, and to be called Virginia District; one to consist of the remaining part of the State of Virginia, and to be called Kentucky District; one to consist of the State of South Carolina, and to be called South Carolina District; and one to consist of the State of Georgia, and to be called Georgia District.

SEC. 3. And be it further enacted, That there be a court called a District Court, in each of the afore mentioned districts, to consist of one judge, who shall reside in the district for which he is appointed, and shall be called a District Judge, and shall hold annually four sessions, the first of which to commence as follows, to wit: in the districts of New York and of New Jersey on the first, in the district of Pennsylvania on the second, in the district of Connecticut on the third, and in the district of Delaware on the fourth, Tuesdays of November next; in the districts of Massachusetts, of Maine, and of Maryland, on the first, in the district of Georgia on the second, and in the districts of New Hampshire, of Virginia, and of Kentucky, on the third Tuesdays of December next; and the other three sessions progressively in the respective districts on the like Tuesdays of every third calendar month afterwards, and in the district of South Carolina, on the third Monday in March and September, the first Monday in July, and the second Monday in December of each and every year, commencing in December next; and that the District Judge shall have power to hold special courts at his discretion. That the stated District Court shall be held at the places following, to wit: in the district of Maine, at Portland and Pownalsborough alternately, beginning at the first; in the district of New Hampshire, at Exeter and Portsmouth alternately, beginning at the first; in the district of Massachusetts, at Boston and Salem alternately, beginning at the first; in the district of Connecticut, alternately at Hartford and New Haven, beginning at the first; in the district of New York, at New York; in the district of New Jersey, alternately at New Brunswick and Burlington, beginning at the first; in the district of Pennsylvania, at Philadelphia and York Town alternately, beginning at the first; in the district of Delaware, alternately at Newcastle and Dover, beginning at the first; in the district of Maryland, alternately at Baltimore and Easton, beginning at the first; in the district of Virginia, alternately at Richmond and Williamsburgh, beginning at the first; in the district of Kentucky, at Harrodsburgh; in the district of South Carolina, at Charleston; and in the district of Georgia, alternately at Savannah and Augusta, beginning at the first; and that the special courts shall be held at the same place in each district as the stated courts, or in districts that have two, at either of them, in the discretion of the judge, or at such other place in the district, as the nature of the business and his discretion shall direct. And that in the districts that have but one place for holding the District Court, the records thereof shall be kept at that place; and in districts that have two, at that place in each district which the judge shall appoint.

SEC. 4. And be it further enacted, That the before mentioned districts, except those of Maine and Kentucky, shall be divided into three circuits, and be called the eastern, the middle, and the southern circuit. That the eastern circuit shall consist of the districts of New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut and New York; that the middle circuit shall consist of the districts of New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland and Virginia; and that the southern circuit shall consist of the districts of South Carolina and Georgia, and that there shall be held annually in each district of said circuits, two courts, which shall be called Circuit Courts, and shall consist of any two justices of the Supreme Court, and the district judge of such districts, any two of whom shall constitute a quorum: Provided, That no district judge shall give a vote in any case of appeal or error from his own decision; but may assign the reasons of such his decision.

SEC. 5. And be it further enacted, That the first session of the said circuit court in the several districts shall commence at the times following, to wit: in New Jersey on the second, in New York on the fourth, in Pennsylvania on the eleventh, in Connecticut on the twenty-second, and in Delaware on the twenty-seventh, days of April next; in Massachusetts on the third, in Maryland on the seventh, in South Carolina on the twelfth, in New Hampshire on the twentieth, in Virginia on the twenty-second, and in Georgia on the twenty-eighth, days of May next, and the subsequent sessions in the respective districts on the like days of every sixth calendar month afterwards, except in South Carolina, where the session of the said court shall commence on the first, and in Georgia where it shall commence on the seventeenth day of October, and except when any of those days shall happen on a Sunday, and then the session shall commence on the next day following. And the sessions of the said circuit court shall be held in the district of New Hampshire, at Portsmouth and Exeter alternately, beginning at the first; in the district of Massachusetts, at Boston; in the district of Connecticut, alternately at Hartford and New Haven, beginning at the last; in the district of New York, alternately at New York and Albany, beginning at the first; in the district of New Jersey, at Trenton; in the district of Pennsylvania, alternately at Philadelphia and Yorktown, beginning at the first; in the district of Delaware, alternately at New Castle and Dover, beginning at the first; in the district of Maryland, alternately at Annapolis and Easton, beginning at the first; in the district of Virginia, alternately at Charlottesville and Williamsburgh, beginning at the first; in the district of South Carolina, alternately at Columbia and Charleston, beginning at the first; and in the district of Georgia, alternately at Savannah and Augusta, beginning at the first. And the circuit courts shall have power to hold special sessions for the trial of criminal causes at any other time at their discretion, or at the discretion of the Supreme Court.

SEC. 6. And be it further enacted, That the Supreme Court may, by any one or more of its justices being present, be adjourned from day to day until a quorum be convened; and that a circuit court may also be adjourned from day to day by any one of its judges, or if none are present, by the marshal of the district until a quorum be convened; and that a district court, in case of the inability of the judge to attend at the commencement of a session, may by virtue of a written order from the said judge, directed to the marshal of the district, be adjourned by the said marshal to such day, antecedent to the next stated session of the said court, as in the said order shall be appointed; and in case of the death of the said judge, and his vacancy not being supplied, all process, pleadings and proceedings of what nature soever, pending before the said court, shall be continued of course until the next stated session after the appointment and acceptance of the office by his successor.

SEC. 7. And be it [further] enacted, That the Supreme Court, and the district courts shall have power to appoint clerks for their respective courts, and that the clerk for each district court shall be clerk also of the circuit court in such district, and each of the said clerks shall, before he enters upon the execution of his office, take the following oath or affirmation, to wit: "I, A. B., being appointed clerk of , do solemnly swear, or affirm, that I will truly and faithfully enter and record all the orders, decrees, judgments and proceedings of the said court, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties of my said office, according to the best of my abilities and understanding. So help me God." Which words, so help me God, shall be omitted in all cases where an affirmation is admitted instead of an oath. And the said clerks shall also severally give bond, with sufficient sureties, (to be approved of by the Supreme and district courts respectively) to the United States, in the sum of two thousand dollars, faithfully to discharge the duties of his office, and seasonably to record the decrees, judgments and determinations of the court of which he is clerk.

SEC. 8. And be it further enacted, That the justices of the Supreme Court, and the district judges, before they proceed to execute the duties of their respective offices, shall take the following oath or affirmation, to wit: "I, A. B., do solemnly swear or affirm, that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent on me as , according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the constitution, and laws of the United States. So help me God."

SEC. 9. And be it further enacted, That the district courts shall have, exclusively of the courts of the several States, cognizance of all crimes and offences that shall be cognizable under the authority of the United States, committed within their respective districts, or upon the high seas; where no other punishment than whipping, not exceeding thirty stripes, a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars, or a term of imprisonment not exceeding six months, is to be inflicted; and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, including all seizures under laws of impost, navigation or trade of the United States, where the seizures are made, on waters which are navigable from the sea by vessels of ten or more tons burthen, within their respective districts as well as upon the high seas; saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it; and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all seizures on land, or other waters than as aforesaid, made, and of all suits for penalties and forfeitures incurred, under the laws of the United States. And shall also have cognizance, concurrent with the courts of the several States, or the circuit courts, as the case may be, of all causes where an alien sues for a tort only in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. And shall also have cognizance, concurrent as last mentioned, of all suits at common law where the United States sue, and the matter in dispute amounts, exclusive of costs, to the sum or value of one hundred dollars. And shall also have jurisdiction exclusively of the courts of the several States, of all suits against consuls or vice-consuls, except for offences above the description aforesaid. And the trial of issues in fact, in the district courts, in all causes except civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, shall be by jury.

SEC. 10.  And be it further enacted, That the district court in Kentucky district shall, besides the jurisdiction aforesaid, have jurisdiction of all other causes, except of appeals and writs of error, hereinafter made cognizable in a circuit court, and shall proceed therein in the same manner as a circuit court, and writs of error and appeals shall lie from decisions therein to the Supreme Court in the same causes, as from a circuit court to the Supreme Court, and under the same regulations. And the district court in Maine district shall, besides the jurisdiction herein before granted, have jurisdiction of all causes, except of appeals and writs of error herein after made cognizable in a circuit court, and shall proceed therein in the same manner as a circuit court: And writs of error shall lie from decisions therein to the circuit court in the district of Massachusetts in the same manner as from other district courts to their respective circuit courts.

SEC. 11.  And be it further enacted, That the circuit courts shall have original cognizance, concurrent with the courts of the several States, of all suits of a civil nature at common law or in equity, where the matter in dispute exceeds, exclusive of costs, the sum or value of five hundred dollars, and the United States are plaintiffs, or petitioners; or an alien is a party, or the suit is between a citizen of the State where the suit is brought, and a citizen of another State. And shall have exclusive cognizance of all crimes and offences cognizable under the authority of the United States, except where this act otherwise provides, or the laws of the United States shall otherwise direct, and concurrent jurisdiction with the district courts of the crimes and offences cognizable therein. But no person shall be arrested in one district for trial in another, in any civil action before a circuit or district court. And no civil suit shall be brought before either of said courts against an inhabitant of the United States, by any original process in any other district than that whereof he is an inhabitant, or in which he shall be found at the time of serving the writ, nor shall any district or circuit court have cognizance of any suit to recover the contents of any promissory note or other chose in action in favour of an assignee, unless a suit might have been prosecuted in such court to recover the said contents if no assignment had been made, except in cases of foreign bills of exchange. And the circuit courts shall also have appellate jurisdiction from the district courts under the regulations and restrictions herein after provided.

SEC. 12. And be it further enacted, That if a suit be commenced in any state court against an alien, or by a citizen of the state in which the suit is brought against a citizen of another state, and the matter in dispute exceeds the aforesaid sum or value of five hundred dollars, exclusive of costs, to be made to appear to the satisfaction of the court; and the defendant shall, at the time of entering his appearance in such state court, file a petition for the removal of the cause for trial into the next circuit court, to be held in the district where the suit is pending, or if in the district of Maine to the district court next to be holden therein, or if in Kentucky district to the district court next to be holden therein, and offer good and sufficient surety for his entering in such court, on the first day of its session, copies of said process against him, and also for his there appearing and entering special bail in the cause, if special bail was originally requisite therein, it shall then be the duty of the state court to accept the surety, and proceed no further in the cause, and any bail that may have been originally taken shall be discharged, and the said copies being entered as aforesaid, in such court of the United States, the cause shall there proceed in the same manner as if it had been brought there by original process. And any attachment of the goods or estate of the defendant by the original process, shall hold the goods or estate so attached, to answer the final judgment in the same manner as by the laws of such state they would have been holden to answer final judgment, had it been rendered by the court in which the suit commenced. And if in any action commenced in a state court, the title of land be concerned, and the parties are citizens of the same state, and the matter in dispute exceeds the sum or value of five hundred dollars, exclusive of costs, the sum or value being made to appear to the satisfaction of the court, either party, before the trial, shall state to the court and make affidavit if they require it, that he claims and shall rely upon a right or title to the land, under a grant from a state other than that in which the suit is pending, and produce the original grant or an exemplification of it, except where the loss of public records shall put it out of his power, and shall move that the adverse party inform the court, whether he claims a right or title to the land under a grant from the state in which the suit is pending; the said adverse [party] shall give such information, or otherwise not be allowed to plead such grant, or give it in evidence upon the trial, and if he informs that he does claim under such grant, the party claiming under the grant first mentioned may then, on motion, remove the cause for trial to the next circuit court to be holden in such district, or if in the district of Maine, to the court next to be holden therein; or if in Kentucky district, to the district court next to be holden therein; but if he is the defendant, shall do it under the same regulations as in the before-mentioned case of the removal of a cause into such court by an alien; and neither party removing the cause, shall be allowed to plead or give evidence of any other title than that by him stated as aforesaid, as the ground of his claim; and the trial of issues in fact in the circuit courts shall, in all suits, except those of equity, and of admiralty, and maritime jurisdiction, be by jury.

SEC. 13. And be it further enacted, That the Supreme Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction of all controversies of a civil nature, where a state is a party, except between a state and its citizens; and except also between a state and citizens of other states, or aliens, in which latter case it shall have original but not exclusive jurisdiction. And shall have exclusively all such jurisdiction of suits or proceedings against ambassadors, or other public ministers, or their domestics, or domestic servants, as a court of law can have or exercise consistently with the law of nations; and original, but not exclusive jurisdiction of all suits brought by ambassadors, or other public ministers, or in which a consul, or vice consul, shall be a party. And the trial of issues in fact in the Supreme Court, in all actions at law against citizens of the United States, shall be by jury. The Supreme Court shall also have appellate jurisdiction from the circuit courts and courts of the several states, in the cases herein after specially provided for; and shall have power to issue writs of prohibition to the district courts, when proceeding as courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, and writs of mandamus, in cases warranted by the principles and usages of law, to any courts appointed, or persons holding office, under the authority of the United States.

SEC. 14. And be it further enacted, That all the before-mentioned courts of the United States, shall have power to issue writs of scire facias, habeas corpus, and all other writs not specially provided for by statute, which may be necessary for the exercise of their respective jurisdictions, and agreeable to the principles and usages of law. And that either of the justices of the supreme court, as well as judges of the district courts, shall have power to grant writs of habeas corpus for the purpose of an inquiry into the cause of commitment.——Provided, That writs of habeas corpus shall in no case extend to prisoners in gaol, unless where they are in custody, under or by colour of the authority of the United States, or are committed for trial before some court of the same, or are necessary to be brought into court to testify.

SEC. 15. And be it further enacted, That all the said courts of the United States, shall have power in the trial of actions at law, on motion and due notice thereof being given, to require the parties to produce books or writings in their possession or power, which contain evidence pertinent to the issue, in cases and under circumstances where they might be compelled to produce the same by the ordinary rules of proceeding in chancery; and if a plaintiff shall fail to comply with such order, to produce books or writings, it shall be lawful for the courts respectively, on motion, to give the like judgment for the defendant as in cases of nonsuit; and if a defendant shall fail to comply with such order, to produce books or writings, it shall be lawful for the courts respectively on motion as aforesaid, to give judgment against him or her by default.

SEC. 16. And be it further enacted, That suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States, in any case where plain, adequate and complete remedy may be had at law.

SEC. 17. And be it further enacted, That all the said courts of the United States shall have power to grant new trials, in cases where there has been a trial by jury for reasons for which new trials have usually been granted in the courts of law; and shall have power to impose and administer all necessary oaths or affirmations, and to punish by fine or imprisonment, at the discretion of said courts, all contempts of authority in any cause or hearing before the same; and to make and establish all necessary rules for the orderly conducting business in the said courts, provided such rules are not repugnant to the laws of the United States.

SEC. 18. And be it further enacted, That when in a circuit court, judgment upon a verdict in a civil action shall be entered, execution may on motion of either party, at the discretion of the court, and on such conditions for the security of the adverse party as they may judge proper, be stayed forty-two days from the time of entering judgment, to give time to file in the clerk’s office of said court, a petition for a new trial. And if such petition be there filed within said term of forty-two days, with a certificate thereon from either of the judges of such court, that he allows the same to be filed, which certificate he may make or refuse at his discretion, execution shall of course be further stayed to the next session of said court. And if a new trial be granted, the former judgment shall be thereby rendered void.

SEC. 19. And be it further enacted, That it shall be the duty of circuit courts, in causes in equity and of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, to cause the facts on which they found their sentence or decree, fully to appear upon the record either from the pleadings and decree itself, or a state of the case agreed by the parties, or their counsel, or if they disagree by a stating of the case by the court.

SEC. 20. And be it further enacted, That where in a circuit court, a plaintiff in an action, originally brought there, or a petitioner in equity, other than the United States, recovers less than the sum or value of five hundred dollars, or a libellant, upon his own appeal, less than the sum or value of three hundred dollars, he shall not be allowed, but at the discretion of the court, may be adjudged to pay costs.

SEC. 21. And be it further enacted, That from final decrees in a district court in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, where the matter in dispute exceeds the sum or value of three hundred dollars, exclusive of costs, an appeal shall be allowed to the next circuit court, to be held in such district. Provided nevertheless, That all such appeals from final decrees as aforesaid, from the district court of Maine, shall be made to the circuit court, next to be holden after each appeal in the district of Massachusetts.

SEC. 22. And be it further enacted, That final decrees and judgments in civil actions in a district court, where the matter in dispute exceeds the sum or value of fifty dollars, exclusive of costs, may be reexamined, and reversed or affirmed in a circuit court, holden in the same district, upon a writ of error, whereto shall be annexed and returned therewith at the day and place therein mentioned, an authenticated transcript of the record, an assignment of errors, and prayer for reversal, with a citation to the adverse party, signed by the judge of such district court, or a justice of the Supreme Court, the adverse party having at least twenty days’ notice. And upon a like process, may final judgments and decrees in civil actions, and suits in equity in a circuit court, brought there by original process, or removed there from courts of the several States, or removed there by appeal from a district court where the matter in dispute exceeds the sum or value of two thousand dollars, exclusive of costs, be re-examined and reversed or affirmed in the Supreme Court, the citation being in such case signed by a judge of such circuit court, or justice of the Supreme Court, and the adverse party having at least thirty days’ notice. But there shall be no reversal in either court on such writ of error for error in ruling any plea in abatement, other than a plea to the jurisdiction of the court, or such plea to a petition or bill in equity, as is in the nature of a demurrer, or for any error in fact. And writs of error shall not be brought but within five years after rendering or passing the judgment or decree complained of, or in case the person entitled to such writ of error be an infant, feme covert, non compos mentis, or imprisoned, then within five years as aforesaid, exclusive of the time of such disability. And every justice or judge signing a citation on any writ of error as aforesaid, shall take good and sufficient security, that the plaintiff in error shall prosecute his writ to effect, and answer all damages and costs if he fail to make his plea good.

SEC. 23. And be it further enacted, That a writ of error as aforesaid shall be a supersedeas and stay execution in cases only where the writ of error is served, by a copy thereof being lodged for the adverse party in the clerk’s office where the record remains, within ten days, Sundays exclusive, after rendering the judgment or passing the decree complained of. Until the expiration of which term of ten days, executions shall not issue in any case where a writ of error may be a supersedeas; and whereupon such writ of error the Supreme or a circuit court shall affirm a judgment or decree, they shall adjudge or decree to the respondent in error just damages for his delay, and single or double costs at their discretion.

SEC. 24. And be it further enacted, That when a judgment or decree shall be reversed in a circuit court, such court shall proceed to render such judgment or pass such decree as the district court should have rendered or passed; and the Supreme Court shall do the same on reversals therein, except where the reversal is in favour of the plaintiff, or petitioner in the original suit, and the damages to be assessed, or matter to be decreed, are uncertain, in which case they shall remand the cause for a final decision. And the Supreme Court shall not issue execution in causes that are removed before them by writs of error, but shall send a special mandate to the circuit court to award execution thereupon.

SEC. 25. And be it further enacted, That a final judgment or decree in any suit, in the highest court of law or equity of a State in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under the United States, and the decision is against their validity; or where is drawn in question the validity of a statute of, or an authority exercised under any State, on the ground of their being repugnant to the constitution, treaties or laws of the United States, and the decision is in favour of such their validity, or where is drawn in question the construction of any clause of the constitution, or of a treaty, or statute of, or commission held under the United States, and the decision is against the title, right, privilege or exemption specially set up or claimed by either party, under such clause of the said Constitution, treaty, statute or commission, may be re-examined and reversed or affirmed in the Supreme Court of the United States upon a writ of error, the citation being signed by the chief justice, or judge or chancellor of the court rendering or passing the judgment or decree complained of, or by a justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, in the same manner and under the same regulations, and the writ shall have the same effect, as if the judgment or decree complained of had been rendered or passed in a circuit court, and the proceeding upon the reversal shall also be the same, except that the Supreme Court, instead of remanding the cause for a final decision as before provided, may at their discretion, if the cause shall have been once remanded before, proceed to a final decision of the same, and award execution. But no other error shall be assigned or regarded as a ground of reversal in any such case as aforesaid, than such as appears on the face of the record, and immediately respects the before mentioned questions of validity or construction of the said constitution, treaties, statutes, commissions, or authorities in dispute.

SEC. 26. And be it further enacted, That in all causes brought before either of the courts of the United States to recover the forfeiture annexed to any articles of agreement, covenant, bond, or other speciality, where the forfeiture, breach or non-performance shall appear, by the default or confession of the defendant, or upon demurrer, the court before whom the action is, shall render judgment therein for the plaintiff to recover so much as is due according to equity. And when the sum for which judgment should be rendered is uncertain, the same shall, if either of the parties request it, be assessed by a jury.

SEC. 27. And be it further enacted, That a marshal shall be appointed in and for each district for the term of four years, but shall be removable from office at pleasure, whose duty it shall be to attend the district and circuit courts when sitting therein, and also the Supreme Court in the District in which that court shall sit. And to execute throughout the district, all lawful precepts directed to him, and issued under the authority of the United States, and he shall have power to command all necessary assistance in the execution of his duty, and to appoint as there shall be occasion, one or more deputies, who shall be removable from office by the judge of the district court, or the circuit court sitting within the district, at the pleasure of either; and before he enters on the duties of his office, he shall become bound for the faithful performance of the same, by himself and by his deputies before the judge of the district court to the United States, jointly and severally, with two good and sufficient sureties, inhabitants and freeholders of such district, to be approved by the district judge, in the sum of twenty thousand dollars, and shall take before said judge, as shall also his deputies, before they enter on the duties of their appointment, the following oath of office: "I, A. B., do solemnly swear or affirm, that I will faithfully execute all lawful precepts directed to the marshal of the district of ____________ under the authority of the United States, and true returns make, and in all things well and truly, and without malice or partiality, perform the duties of the office of marshal (or marshal’s deputy, as the case may be) of the district of , during my continuance in said office, and take only my lawful fees. So help me God."

SEC. 28. And be it further enacted, That in all causes wherein the marshal or his deputy shall be a party, the writs and precepts therein shall be directed to such disinterested person as the court, or any justice or judge thereof may appoint, and the person so appointed, is hereby authorized to execute and return the same. And in case of the death of any marshal, his deputy or deputies shall continue in office, unless otherwise specially removed; and shall execute the same in the name of the deceased, until another marshal shall be appointed and sworn: And the defaults or misfeasances in office of such deputy or deputies in the mean time, as well as before, shall be adjudged a breach of the condition of the bond given, as before directed, by the marshal who appointed them; and the executor or administrator of the deceased marshal shall have like remedy for the defaults and misfeasances in office of such deputy or deputies during such interval, as they would be entitled to if the marshal had continued in life and in the exercise of his said office, until his successor was appointed, and sworn or affirmed: And every marshal or his deputy when removed from office, or when the term for which the marshal is appointed shall expire, shall have power notwithstanding to execute all such precepts as may be in their hands respectively at the time of such removal or expiration of office; and the marshal shall be held answerable for the delivery to his successor of all prisoners which may be in his custody at the time of his removal, or when the term for which he is appointed shall expire, and for that purpose may retain such prisoners in his custody until his successor shall be appointed and qualified as the law directs.

SEC. 29. And be it further enacted, That in cases punishable with death, the trial shall be had in the county where the offence was committed, or where that cannot be done without great inconvenience, twelve petit jurors at least shall be summoned from thence. And jurors in all cases to serve in the courts of the United States shall be designated by lot or otherwise in each State respectively according to the mode of forming juries therein now practised, so far as the laws of the same shall render such designation practicable by the courts or marshals of the United States; and the jurors shall have the same qualifications as are requisite for jurors by the laws of the State of which they are citizens, to serve in the highest courts of law of such State, and shall be returned as there shall be occasion for them, from such parts of the district from time to time as the court shall direct, so as shall be most favourable to an impartial trial, and so as not to incur an unnecessary expense, or unduly to burthen the citizens of any part of the district with such services. And writs of venire facias when directed by the court shall issue from the clerk’s office, and shall be served and returned by the marshal in his proper person, or by his deputy, or in case the marshal or his deputy is not an indifferent person, or is interested in the event of the cause, by such fit person as the court shall specially appoint for that purpose, to whom they shall administer an oath or affirmation that he will truly and impartially serve and return such writ. And when from challenges or otherwise there shall not be a jury to determine any civil or criminal cause, the marshal or his deputy shall, by order of the court where such defect of jurors shall happen, return jurymen de talibus circumstantibus sufficient to complete the pannel; and when the marshal or his deputy are disqualified as aforesaid, jurors may be returned by such disinterested person as the court shall appoint.

SEC. 30. And be it further enacted, That the mode of proof by oral testimony and examination of witnesses in open court shall be the same in all the courts of the United States, as well in the trial of causes in equity and of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, as of actions at common law. And when the testimony of any person shall be necessary in any civil cause depending in any district in any court of the United States, who shall live at a greater distance from the place of trial than one hundred miles, or is bound on a voyage to sea, or is about to go out of the United States, or out of such district, and to a greater distance from the place of trial than as aforesaid, before the time of trial, or is ancient or very infirm, the deposition of such person may be taken de bene esse before any justice or judge of any of the courts of the United States, or before any chancellor, justice or judge of a supreme or superior court, mayor or chief magistrate of a city, or judge of a county court or court of common pleas of any of the United States, not being of counsel or attorney to either of the parties, or interested in the event of the cause, provided that a notification from the magistrate before whom the deposition is to be taken to the adverse party, to be present at the taking of the same, and to put interrogatories, if he think fit, be first made out and served on the adverse party or his attorney as either may be nearest, if either is within one hundred miles of the place of such caption, allowing time for their attendance after notified, not less than at the rate of one day, Sundays exclusive, for every twenty miles travel. And in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, or other cases of seizure when a libel shall be filed, in which an adverse party is not named, and depositions of persons circumstanced as aforesaid shall be taken before a claim be put in, the like notification as aforesaid shall be given to the person having the agency or possession of the property libelled at the time of the capture or seizure of the same, if known to the libellant. And every person deposing as aforesaid shall be carefully examined and cautioned, and sworn or affirmed to testify the whole truth, and shall subscribe the testimony by him or her given after the same shall be reduced to writing, which shall be done only by the magistrate taking the deposition, or by the deponent in his presence. And the depositions so taken shall be retained by such magistrate until he deliver the same with his own hand into the court for which they are taken, or shall , together with a certificate of the reasons as aforesaid of their being taken, and of the notice if any given to the adverse party, be by him the said magistrate sealed up and directed to such court, and remain under his seal until opened in court. And any person may be compelled to appear and depose as aforesaid in the same manner as to appear and testify in court. And in the trial of any cause of admiralty or maritime jurisdiction in a district court, the decree in which may be appealed from, if either party shall suggest to and satisfy the court that probably it will not be in his power to produce the witnesses there testifying before the circuit court should an appeal be had, and shall move that their testimony be taken down in writing, it shall be so done by the clerk of the court. And if an appeal be had, such testimony may be used on the trial of the same, if it shall appear to the satisfaction of the court which shall try the appeal, that the witnesses are then dead or gone out of the United States, or to a greater distance than as aforesaid from the place where the court is sitting, or that by reason of age, sickness, bodily infirmity or imprisonment, they are unable to travel and appear at court, but not otherwise. And unless the same shall be made to appear on the trial of any cause, with respect to witnesses whose depositions may have been taken therein, such depositions shall not be admitted or used in the cause. Provided, That nothing herein shall be construed to prevent any court of the United States from granting a dedimus potestatem to take depositions according to common usage, when it may be necessary to prevent a failure or delay of justice, which power they shall severally possess, nor to extend to depositions taken in perpetuam rei memoriam, which if they relate to matters that may be cognizable in any court of the United States, a circuit court on application thereto made as a court of equity, may, according to the usages in chancery direct to be taken.

SEC. 31. And be it [further] enacted, That where any suit shall be depending in any court of the United States, and either of the parties shall die before final judgment, the executor or administrator of such deceased party who was plaintiff, petitioner, or defendant, in case the cause of action doth by law survive, shall have full power to prosecute or defend any such suit or action until final judgment; and the defendant or defendants are hereby obliged to answer thereto accordingly; and the court before whom such cause may be depending, is hereby empowered and directed to hear and determine the same, and to render judgment for or against the executor or administrator, as the case may require. And if such executor or administrator having been duly served with a scire facias from the office of the clerk of the court where such suit is depending, twenty days beforehand, shall neglect or refuse to become a party to the suit, the court may render judgment against the estate of the deceased party, in the same manner as if the executor or administrator had voluntarily made himself a party to the suit. And the executor or administrator who shall become a party as aforesaid, shall, upon motion to the court where the suit is depending, be entitled to a continuance of the same until the next term of the said court. And if there be two or more plaintiffs or defendants, and one or more of them shall die, if the cause of action shall survive to the surviving plaintiff or plaintiffs, or against the surviving defendant or defendants, the writ or action shall not be thereby abated; but such death being suggested upon the record, the action shall proceed at the suit of the surviving plaintiff or plaintiffs against the surviving defendant or defendants.

SEC. 32. And be it further enacted, That no summons, writ, declaration, return, process, judgment, or other proceedings in civil causes in any of the courts of the United States, shall be abated, arrested, quashed or reversed, for any defect or want of form, but the said courts respectively shall proceed and give judgment according as the right of the cause and matter in law shall appear unto them, without regarding any imperfections, defects, or want of form in such writ, declaration, or other pleading, return, process, judgment, or course of proceeding whatsoever, except those only in cases of demurrer, which the party demurring shall specially sit down and express together with his demurrer as the cause thereof. And the said courts respectively shall and may, by virtue of this act, from time to time, amend all and every such imperfections, defects and wants of form, other than those only which the party demurring shall express as aforesaid, and may at any time permit either of the parties to amend any defect in the process or pleadings, upon such conditions as the said courts respectively shall in their discretion, and by their rules prescribe.

SEC. 33. And be it further enacted, That for any crime or offence against the United States, the offender may, by any justice or judge of the United States, or by any justice of the peace, or other magistrate of any of the United States where he may be found agreeably to the usual mode of process against offenders in such state, and at the expense of the United States, be arrested, and imprisoned or bailed, as the case may be, for trial before such court of the United States as by this act has cognizance of the offence. And copies of the process shall be returned as speedily as may be into the clerk’s office of such court, together with the recognizances of the witnesses for their appearance to testify in the case; which recognizances the magistrate before whom the examination shall be, may require on pain of imprisonment. And if such commitment of the offender, or the witnesses shall be in a district other than that in which the offence is to be tried, it shall be the duty of the judge of that district where the delinquent is imprisoned, seasonably to issue, and of the marshal of the same district to execute, a warrant for the removal of the offender, and the witnesses, or either of them, as the case may be, to the district in which the trial is to be had. And upon all arrests in criminal cases, bail shall be admitted, except where the punishment may be death, in which cases it shall not be admitted but by the supreme or a circuit court, or by a justice of the supreme court, or a judge of a district court, who shall exercise their discretion therein, regarding the nature and circumstances of the offence, and of the evidence, and the usages of law. And if a person committed by a justice of the supreme or a judge of a district court for an offence not punishable with death, shall afterwards procure bail, and there be no judge of the United States in the district to take the same, it may be taken by any judge of the supreme or superior court of law of such state.

SEC. 34. And be it further enacted, That the laws of the several states, except where the constitution, treaties or statutes of the United States shall otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in trials at common law in the courts of the United States in cases where they apply.

SEC. 35. And be it further enacted, That in all courts of the United States, the parties may plead and manage their own causes personally or by assistance of such counsel or attorneys at law as by the rules of the said courts respectively shall be permitted to manage and conduct causes therein. And there shall be appointed in each district a meet person learned in the law to act as attorney for the United States in such district, who shall be sworn or affirmed to the faithful execution of his office, whose duty it shall be to prosecute in such district all delinquents for crimes and offences, cognizable under the authority of the United States, and all civil actions in which the United States shall be concerned, except before the supreme court in the district in which that court shall be holden. And he shall receive as compensation for his services such fees as shall be taxed therefor in the respective courts before which the suits or prosecutions shall be. And there shall also be appointed a meet person, learned in the law, to act as attorney-general for the United States, who shall be sworn or affirmed to a faithful execution of his office; whose duty it shall be to prosecute and conduct all suits in the Supreme Court in which the United States shall be concerned, and to give his advice and opinion upon questions of law when required by the President of the United States, or when requested by the heads of any of the departments, touching any matters that may concern their departments, and shall receive such compensation for his services as shall by law be provided.

APPROVED , September 24, 1789.

==============================================================================================================


Admiralty Jurisdiction and Maritime Law Agencies:
Federal departments, agencies, and other instrumentalities responsible for
administering relevant laws.
Citation: U.S. Const., art. III, § 2 Enacted as: Judiciary Act of 1789 Where Law Applies:
U.S. admiralty law applies to any waters navigable subject to interstate or
foreign commerce.

Summary of the Law:
Although the terms “admiralty law” and “maritime law” are often used synonymously in the United States, they are in fact distinct from one another. The Framers of the U.S. Constitution used both words in Article III, Section 2: “The Judicial Power shall extend . . . to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction . . . .” (U.S. Const., art. III, § 2).

Admiralty law is comprised of rules that define the scope of the court’s admiralty jurisdiction, while maritime law is the
substantive law applied by a court exercising admiralty jurisdiction. Maritime law consists of substantive rules created by federal courts, referred to as “general maritime law”, which do not arise from the Constitution or legislation of the U.S. However, the federal courts’ power to create these rules does arise from the Constitution’s grant of admiralty jurisdiction, as does Congress’s limited power to supplement admiralty law. General maritime law may apply rules that are customarily applied in other countries or those which are purely domestic.

The federal courts have also occasionally looked to state law in resolving maritime disputes. American admiralty and maritime law originally developed from British admiralty courts present in American colonies which operated separate from courts of law and equity.

Through the Judiciary Act of 1789, the U.S. Congress placed admiralty and maritime law under the jurisdiction of the federal district courts. Parties may not contract out of admiralty jurisdiction and states may not infringe on admiralty jurisdiction, either judicially or legislatively. However, admiralty courts are those of limited jurisdiction and do not extend to non-maritime matters.
The “saving to suitors” clause provides for concurrent state jurisdiction to allow for non-admiralty remedies, as well. (28 U.S.C. § 1333(1)).

Source: Martin J. Davies, Teaching Admiralty Law Requires Dismissing Important Subjects, 55 St. Louis U. L.J. 483 (2011); Cornell University Law School, Legal Information Institute, Admiralty: An Overview; and Federal Judicial Center publication, Robert Force, Admiralty and Maritime Law
(2004).
Maritime Law as it Relates to Salvagehttp://csc.noaa.gov/data/Documents/OceanLawSearch/Summary%20of%20Law%20-%20Admiralty%20Law.pdf

(28 U.S.C. § 1333(1)).

§ 1333. Admiralty, maritime and prize cases
The district courts shall have original juris
-
diction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of:
(1) Any civil case of admiralty or maritime
jurisdiction, saving to suitors in all cases all
other remedies to which they are otherwise
entitled.

See Original contained in attachment

Origins of Salvage Law
The collection of maritime laws created around 900 BCE in Athens, specifically the city state of
Rhodes,
first codified the principle of offering a reward for the saving of imperiled maritime
property.
One
-
fifth of any property saved from an imperiled vessel was awarded to the salvor.
If the vessel was already lost to the sea, either one
-
third or one
-
half w
as awarded to the salvor,
depending on the danger taken to retrieve the items.
Further, Rhodian law punished those who
took anything from a wreck by violence by requiring the looter to return the property fourfold.
As Rhodes became part of the Roman Empi
re, Roman law adopted Rhodian maritime law.
The
roman
-
Byzantine Code and Digest of Justinian, compiled around 500 AD, contained edicts and
opinions which reflected Mediterranean maritime law practices, including the doctrine of the
salvor’s right to be re
warded for his voluntary services, even if the services were rendered
without the owner’s request or knowledge.
This doctrine was known as
negotiorum gestio
and
was based on the theory of preventing unjust enrichment of one at the expense of another.
Wit
h
the decline of the Roman Empire, salvage law principles were passed on, as found in the Marine
Ordinances of the Italian City of Trani in 1063 AD.
Less than two hundred years later, the Laws
of Oleron (or Rolls d’Oleron) from a port city of France, whic
h contained provisions related to
the law of salvage and finds, were introduced into the English legal system by King Richard I
during his reign from 1189 to 1199.
These laws were strikingly similar to the maritime rules in
Spain and to those developed in
Sweden in 1505, known as the Rules of Visby.
Surviving the transfer of laws from civilization to civilization over the centuries were three main
concepts of salvage law: (1) the property right in the wrecked vessel may escheat (revert) to the
state; (2)
a wrecked vessel may be claimed by whoever first locates and obtains possession of it;
and (3) that the title of the wrecked vessel remains with the owner, but the owner may be
required to pay a salvage award to whoever saves the property and return it to
the owner.
Generally, the efforts and expenses undertaken by one man to preserve the property of another
do not create a lien upon the property benefited or an obligation to repay the expenditure.
However, the exception to this rule is the maritime law
concept of salvage.
The reasoning
underlying this policy arising out of the importance of trade, the peril of the sea, and that the
property saved was in exceptional circumstances.
The public policy differences between


rewarding for salvage at sea versu


s on land still persist in today’s modern world.
Modern Salvage Law
A lawsuit for a salvage award may be brought against either the vessel owner or the vessel itself
in rem
.
In an
in rem
proceeding, the
res
(e.g., an object from the wreck) must be pres
ent in the
district when the suit is filed or during the pendency of the action.
To claim a salvage award,
there must be a nexus between the item salvaged and traditional maritime activities, although this
has been liberally interpreted.
A person may pro
vide salvage service to a vessel and its cargo
without first receiving a request from the owner or agent of the vessel if it appears that a
reasonable owner would have agreed to the services if he was present to do so.
However,
services which are rendered
despite the objection of the person in authority over the vessel will

THE NEW T.R.N.'S ARE ABOUT TO LAND!!

THE NEW T.R.N.'S ARE ABOUT TO LAND!!! 
Posted by FORO DINAR GURUS at 12:40 PM

REGARDING THE REPORT ABOUT MILITARY VISITING HOMES IN OHIO WITH STORIES OF $2,000 VOUCHERS COMING

REGARDING THE REPORT ABOUT MILITARY VISITING HOMES IN OHIO WITH STORIES OF $2,000 VOUCHERS COMING

Report from a well connected American .................................
Date: Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:50 AM
I have NOW been in contact with 5 sheriffs and over 2 dozen former US Marines  .. these men / women live in over 22 different Counties in Ohio

NO ONE has confirmed  and all started out with open minds... THEY ARE NOT LAUGHING.  They are just saddened to believe such misrepresentations are being spread.  WE all believe such distractions will in the future be used to disunite many who would rather fight than surrender...

Just OUR 2 cents...   and IF you have a more definite county,  WE have men/women willing to drive to it within 30 min of notice.

Semper Fi
***************************************************************************

(*) Intel coming in from Boots on the Ground in Ohio - March 27, 2014                               
"Report coming in that "good" military are going house to house in areas of Ohio getting names, phone #, and address.  Military personnel said that they would be coming back to give $2,000 vouchers to citizens to use when things start to "it's about to break", "it can come right now". "There's going to be a big change coming" said the military person who was going door to door in rural area of Ohio.  Military are saying that orders came from Washington D.C. Military is saying to stock up on items of importance.  Military personnel mentioned that we "were going back to common law".  

Is this a true story?  You listen and decide.

CALL THIS TELEPHONE NUMBER AND LISTEN..............
(805)-399-1299
PIN: 776046#
"



Nine Air Force commanders lost their jobs in the wake of a cheating scandal involving systemic cheating on tests by officers in the U.S. nuclear missile program

video on this page

Washington (CNN) -- Nine Air Force commanders lost their jobs in the wake of a cheating scandal involving systemic cheating on tests by officers in the U.S. nuclear missile program, officials from that military branch said Thursday.
The fired officers were in "leadership positions" at Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana, Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James said. Though not directly involved in cheating, "they failed to provide adequate oversight of their crew force," according to James.
In addition, Col. Robert Stanley -- head of the 341st Missile Wing and a 25-year veteran -- "relinquished command" and submitted his resignation Thursday morning, said Lt. Gen. Stephen Wilson, the commander of the Air Force's Global Strike Command.
"Leadership's focus on perfection led commanders to micromanage their people," said Wilson, pointing to pressure to get 100% scores on monthly proficiency exams when only 90% was necessary to pass. "... Leaders lost sight of the fact that execution in the field is more important than what happens in the classroom."
James said Thursday that 100 lower-level officers were at one point implicated in the ordeal -- having either been accused directly of cheating or having looked the other way. Nine of those have been cleared and will be allowed to return to duty, while others could face punishments ranging from letters of counseling to courts-martial on various charges.
These disciplinary measures are only part of the response, however. James and Wilson both referred to a number of changes to address this incident as well as far-reaching issues with morale, micromanagement and more among those in the Air Force's intercontinental ballistic missile program.
"The issues that we have before us today are tough, and they didn't come overnight," said James. "... While we have progress in certain areas in recent years, there is more work to be done."
Military investigators stumbled into the cheating scandal while looking into alleged drug activity involving airmen. Three of their targets in the drug probe happened to work as missile crew members at Malmstrom, which is how investigators got access to their cell phones -- and "found test material on them," according to Wilson.
Authorities previously said the cheating took place last August and September at the Montana base, with officers using texts and pictures to cheat on their proficiency exams.
But Wilson said Thursday that such behavior actually went well beyond that, having occurred as far back as November 2011 and as recently as November 2013.
The whole Malmstrom scheme centered on four individuals, three of whom were being investigated in the drug probe, according to Wilson.
"If we would have removed those, then this incident probably would never have happened," he added.
About 190 officers oversee the readiness of nuclear weapons systems at the Montana base, meaning the episode tainted a large percentage of that force in some way. James said she found worrisome not just that airmen cheated directly, but that no one -- whether or not they were directly involved -- spoke up.
The Air Force officials said investigators didn't find any indication of similar cheating on other bases tied to the missile program, though they pointed to common issues elsewhere when it comes to the program's management.
To that end, Wilson said he has a list of "400 action items" to possible address those issues. Some are simple, like grading the monthly proficiency on a simple pass/fail metric. Others are more complicated, though all have a common aim of ensuring the nuclear weapons program is run smartly and effectively by satisfied, capable military personnel with high integrity.
"Our nation demands and deserves the higher standards of accountability from the force entrusted with the most powerful weapon on the planet," Wilson said. "We are committed to living up to those standards."
CNN's Shirley Henry and Barbara Starr contributed to this report.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/27/us/air-force-cheating-investigation/index.html?hpt=hp_t3

“PAPER MONEY” Obligations of the United States Corporation (U.S.)

“PAPER MONEY” Obligations of the United States Corporation (U.S.)


Congressional Record, March 9, 1933 on HR 1491 p. 83. "Under the new law the money is issued to the banks in return for government obligations, bills of exchange, drafts, notes, trade acceptances, and bankers acceptances. The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the credit of the nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes, and other property of all the people of the nation."

Whereas defined pursuant to titles eighteen sections eight: The term "obligation or other security of the United States" includes all bonds, certificates of indebtedness, national bank currency, Federal Reserve notes, Federal Reserve bank notes, coupons, United States notes, Treasury notes, gold certificates, silver certificates, fractional notes, certificates of deposit, bills, checks, or drafts for money, drawn by or upon authorized officers of the United States, stamps and other representatives of value, of whatever denomination, issued under any Act of Congress, and canceled United States stamps. 

Whereas defined pursuant to: 18 U.S.C. §8, frns are “obligation[s]…of the United States.” Whereas defined pursuant to: 31 U.S.C. 31§742…”obligations of the United States, shall be exempt from taxation by or under state or municipal or local authority.”

The exemption applies to each form of taxation that would require the obligation, the interest on the obligation, or both, to be considered in computing a tax, except - (1) a nondiscriminatory franchise tax or another nonproperty tax instead of a franchise tax, imposed on a corporation; and (2) an estate or inheritance tax. (emphasis added)

Federal reserve notes are not money until they are monetized and issued by a Federal reserve bank. That those “Federal reserve notes” could be issued by the “Federal Reserve Board,” not by any Bank per se; for a one singular purpose, namely, “for the purpose of making advances to Federal reserve banks and for no other purpose.” To obtain notes, a Federal reserve bank must pledge collateral equal to the face value of the note. Collateral must consist of the following assets, alone or in any combination:
1) Gold certificates,
2) Special drawing right certificates,
3) U.S. government securities, and
4) “Eligible paper,” as described by statue. Federal Reserve notes are obligations of the United States, and have a first lien on assets of the issuing Federal Reserve Bank. Money without backing is worthless. Federal reserve notes are legal tender currency whereas defined pursuant to: (31 U.S.C. 5103).

They are issued by the twelve reserve banks defined pursuant to section 16 of the federal reserve act of 1913 (12 U.S.C. 411) a commercial bank which belongs to the Federal Reserve System can obtain Federal reserve notes from the Federal reserve bank in its district whenever it wishes, but it must pay for them in full, dollar for dollar, by drawing down its account with its district Federal reserve bank. The Federal reserve bank in turn obtains the notes from the bureau of engraving and printing in the United States Treasury Department. It pays to the bureau the cost of producing the notes. The Federal reserve notes then become liabilities of the twelve Federal reserve banks. Because the notes are Federal reserve liabilities, the issuing banks records both a liability and an asset when it receives the notes from the bureau of engraving and printing, and therefore does not show any earnings as a result of the transaction (double entry bookkeeping). In addition to being liabilities of the Federal reserve banks, Federal reserve notes are obligations of the United States government whereas defined pursuant to: (12 U.S.C. 411).

Congress has specified that a Federal reserve bank must hold collateral (chiefly gold certificates and United States securities) equal in value to the Federal reserve notes which that bank receives whereas defined pursuant to: (12 U.S.C. 412). The purpose of this section, initially enacted in 1913, was to provide backing for the note issue. The idea was that if the Federal Reserve System were ever dissolved, the United States would take over the notes (liabilities) thus meeting the requirements of [12 U.S.C.] 411, but would also take over the assets, which would be of equal value. The notes are a first lien on all the assets of the Federal reserve banks, as well as on the collateral specifically held against them whereas defined pursuant to: (12 U.S.C. 412). Federal reserve notes are not redeemable in gold or silver or in any other commodity. They have not been redeemable since 1933. Thus, after 1933, a Federal reserve note did not represent a promise to pay gold or anything else, even though the term “note” was retained as part of the name of the currency. In the sense that they are not redeemable, Federal reserve notes have not been backed by anything since 1933.

They are valued not for themselves, but for what they will buy. In another sense, because they are a legal tender, Federal reserve notes are “backed” by all goods and services in the economy. Frns are both “liabilities” and “assets,” so what are they? Accounting units (double entry bookkeeping). What else could they be? “The issuing bank records both a liability and asset when it receives the notes from the bureau of engraving and printing, and therefore does not show any earnings as a result of the transaction.” This implies that the liabilities and assets inherent in each frn are equal, and therefore the value of any frn is zero. i.e., I have a $100 frn that represents $100 in assets and $100 in liabilities – what is my frn worth? Subtract the liabilities from the assets. If they’re equal ($100 - $100), the answer is zero. So what is my frn? It’s a unit of measure, no different from inches, feet, pounds, tons, and centigrams. It’s an accounting unit. A number. What is the tax on a number? Is the tax on 100,000 more than the tax on $1,000? It depends. 100,000 what? 1,000 what? The tax on 100,000 dollars is clearly more than the tax on 1,000 pennies. The tax on 1,000 dollars and 100,000 pennies is identical. And a tax on 1,000 pennies is greater than the tax on 100,000 grains of sand. The taxable item is not the unit of measurement, but the commodity it describes. Therefore, is the tax on $100 in gold-backed money the same as the tax on $100 frn?

Can people be taxed on the basis of an income denominated in units of measurement that the issuing Federal reserve bank implicitly says are worth zero? If the Federal reserve bank can count a frn as both an asset and liability, can I do the same and also have no earnings to be taxed? There is some supporting law. Defined pursuant to: 31 U.S.C. §742 (which deals with “public debt”): “exemption from taxation. Except as otherwise provided by law, all stocks, bonds, treasury notes, and other obligations of the United States, shall be exempt from taxation by or under state or municipal or local authority. This exemption extends to every form of taxation that would require that either the obligations or the interest thereon, or both, be considered, directly or indirectly, in the computation of the tax, except nondiscriminatory franchise or other non-property taxes in lieu thereof imposed on corporations and except estate taxes or inheritance taxes.”  (R.S. & 3701; Sept. 22, 1959, Pub. L. 86-346, Title I, § 105(a), 73 Stat. 622.) [emph. add.] Now consider, whereas defined pursuant to: 18 U.S.C. §8: “obligation or other security of the United States (Inc) defined. “the term obligation or other security of the United States includes all bonds, certificates of indebtedness, national bank currency, federal reserve notes, federal reserve bank notes, coupons, gold certificates, silver certificates, fractional notes, certificates of deposit, bills, checks, or drafts for money, drawn by or upon authorized officers of the United States, stamps and other representatives of value, of whatever denomination, issued under any act of congress, and canceled united states stamps.” [emph. add.] 


THE DERIVATIVE PONZI MORTGAGE BANKING SCHEMES ARE INCESSANT , PERPETUATED, FRAUD

THE DERIVATIVE PONZI MORTGAGE  BANKING SCHEMES ARE INCESSANT , PERPETUATED, FRAUD

SOME GOVERNMENT BIG BANK FAIL: JUDGE RULES FORECLOSURE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
Big Bank FAIL: Judge Rules Foreclosure Unconstitutional
Posted about 14 hours ago | 1 comment

Susanne Posel ,Chief Editor Occupy Corporatism | The US IndependentFebruary 3, 2014

Judge George N. Bowden of the Superior Court in Washington State ruled against Bank of America (BoA) in a foreclosure battle that ended with the nonjudicial foreclosure sale under the Deed of Trust Act (DTA). The sale was deemed void, and the court setting the foreclosure aside.
In this case defended by StafneTrumbull law firm in Washington State, the homeowner won his house from BoA which is another major victory against the unethical and illegal foreclosures industry that has left millions of Americans homeless.


http://www.occupycorporatism.com/big-bank-fail-judge-rules-foreclosure-unconstitutional/

GCR -GLOBAL CURRENCY RESET - INTERVIEW WITH CHRISTINE LAGARDE, IMF

Subject: Fwd: GCR -GLOBAL CURRENCY RESET - INTERVIEW WITH CHRISTINE LAGARDE, IMF


Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:
From: June Reyno <june.reyno@gmail.com>
Date: March 28, 2014, 9:24:47 AM PDT
To: stage3Alpha@gmail.com, TNT stage2 Omega <mail@stage2omega.com>
Subject: Fwd: GCR -GLOBAL CURRENCY RESET - INTERVIEW WITH CHRISTINE LAGARDE, IMF


Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:
From: "1Heart1Glory1Spirit" <auto329508@hushmail.com>
Date: March 28, 2014, 9:21:32 AM PDT
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Subject: GCR -GLOBAL CURRENCY RESET - INTERVIEW WITH CHRISTINE LAGARDE, IMF

FYI.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVsGzIYmquc

http://globalcurrencyreset.net/

Full 29:20 minutes interview
http://www.bloomberg.com/video/an-insight-an-idea-with-christine-lagarde-heKSl1aiRam4JbkkuGEGeg.html

http://newdimension2012.blogspot.com/2014/01/christine-lagarde-of-imf-talks-about.html

http://www.ascensionwithearth.com/2014/01/imf-director-christine-lagarde.html



How acid reflux becomes Barrett’s Esophagus

   Holistic Blends Inc.
Ph.:US/CANADA 1-888-724-4366
Ph: INTERNATIONAL 315-295-1236
Watch us, Tweet us, Like us, Pin us:     

How acid reflux becomes Barrett’s Esophagus
Hi John
If you’re one of the 25 million or so people in the US with acid reflux, you know all too well the misery it can cause.
This can go WAY beyond a 5-alarm heartburn fire in your chest and can include other symptoms that you might not necessarily attribute to acid reflux like bloating and gas, chronic cough, angina-like chest pain and even laryngitis.
But there’s another consequence of acid reflux that is far scarier than an acidy burp or having to sleep propped up on pillows.
It’s called Barrett’s esophagus.
Let’s take a look at this sneaky, scary and possibly deadly condition, as well as explore some ways that you can help keep it far away from you, or keep it quiet if you’ve got it.
What is Barrett's esophagus?
Barrett's esophagus is a condition where the color and the type of cells lining your lower esophagus change, becoming more like the inside of your stomach or intestines instead.
This process is called intestinal metaplasia and is most often the result of repeated exposure to stomach acid -- in other words, acid reflux or GERD (and also sometimes hiatal hernia). Obesity (especially around the abdominal area) can also be a risk factor.
It is three times more common in men than in women, and 55 is the average age at diagnosis.  Approximately 1 in 10 acid reflux/GERD sufferers will develop it. 
Although Barrett's esophagus symptoms are usually the same as acid reflux/GERD, it's also possible to have NO symptoms at all...
This can be especially dangerous because people with Barrett's esophagus have an increased risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma – one of the most rapidly increasing cancers in the United States.
So to not even know you have Barrett's esophagus means it can quietly exist and manifest into cancer.
Barrett's esophagus and cancer
Once cancer occurs, depending on the degree of severity it can result in losing your esophagus.
The surgery is called an esophagectomy. This involves removing your esophagus and the top part of your stomach. A portion of your stomach is then pulled up into your chest and connected to the remaining un-diseased portion of your esophagus.
To say this is traumatic is a vast understatement.
The procedure has a very high mortality rate (I.e.: death risk) and even if you do survive, possible complications of esophagectomy include:
  •           Breathing problems
  •           Increased risk of dangerous infection
  •           Lowered immune system
  •           Permanent damage to your larynx (voice box)
  •           Difficulty swallowing
  •           Frequent vomiting
Clearly, Barrett's is something to take seriously-a diagnosis of it is a loud clanging warning bell.
So understandably, many people with Barrett’s have gotten the you-know-what frightened out of them and are desperate to do whatever they must to avoid its worst consequences. 
Now, the typical suggestions for Barrett’s are the same as acid reflux/GERD--avoid spicy foods and tomatoes, and take acid reducing drugs for life.
Well, let’s talk about that for a moment. 
If avoiding spicy foods and tomatoes and taking acid reducers works SO well, then tell me, why did the acid reflux progress into Barrett’s in the first place?
And how in heaven’s name will those measures do anything to address the Barrett’s once it has occurred?
Answer: They won’t.  As a matter of fact, they can make things even WORSE. 
Here’s why:
Why acid reducers can worsen Barrett’s esophagus
The most common "treatment" for acid reflux/GERD and Barrett's is acid reducing drugs -- PPIs (like Nexium "the purple pill," Prilosec or Prevacid), or H2 Blockers (like Zantac, Pepcid or Tagamet).
Now these drugs work by interfering with your stomach's acid secretions.  PPIs shut down the acid “pumps” in your stomach, and H2 blockers suppress the hormones that signal your stomach to create and secrete acid.
But acid digestive enzymes are CRUCIAL for your body to properly digest proteins!
So when your stomach secretes acid when you eat protein, it's doing its job and should not be interfered with.
But that's precisely what the drugs do.
As a result, your digestion can be greatly slowed and even halted.
Now, your stomach is smart—it senses when this is happening and tries to secrete more acid to kick-start digestion again, but it's eventually stopped again by the drugs.
This cycle can go on for 8-10 hours or more and result in a blob of badly digested, putrefied (rotting) food sloshing around with the acids in your stomach.
Now, guess what happens later, especially as soon as you lie down?
Up, up, up it comes into your throat.
This can create the perfect environment for Barrett's esophagus to flourish.
But your misery won’t necessarily end there, by the way.
Because this poor digestion can also lead to trouble "down south."  When your foods are not broken down like they should be, it creates a big mess for your intestines to handle once everything moves down.  As a result, you can also experience gas, bloating, constipation and diarrhea. 
Those are common side effects of many acid reducing drugs and now you know why that is so.
Now let’s take a look at a safer, natural approach…in other words:
What DOES work for acid reflux/GERD and Barrett’s
If you want to help minimize your chances of developing Barrett's esophagus (or help prevent it from worsening if you already have it), the key is to...
Make sure your digestion is efficient!
When your digestion is accomplished thoroughly and completely, there is no putrefying mass of food or acid to rise into your throat.
In other words, you can help eliminate a primary source of Barrett's (and acid reflux/GERD too!).
This can be accomplished in two easy steps:
1- Through your diet
This means eliminating some acid-creating foods and meals that are causing digestive disaster and replacing them with some alkalinizing foods and food combinations that can be digested more easily.
Note that alkalinizing foods include spices and tomatoes -- they can actually be GOOD for you and your system!
And here’s an important point--even the best, most nutritious foods can be acid-creating to your body IF they are eaten with the wrong other foods. It's not just the foods you eat that counts -- it's what you eat TOGETHER that can be an even bigger issue.
The Great Taste No Pain system will show you step by easy step exactly what to do. 
- http://www.greattastenopain.com/great.asp
The GTNP manuals spell right out which foods are acid-forming vs. alkaline.  They also show you exactly what foods can digest better together and what combinations to avoid. 
Nice and easy!
Once you start making these few modifications to your diet chances are excellent you’ll start seeing a difference in how you feel very quickly. Overproduction of acid can ease as fast as within the first few days.
And that's great news to people with acid reflux/GERD and especially Barrett's!
Now, if you have gluten issues, I’ve got you covered too.  Great Taste No Gluten is for you instead.
- http://www.greattastenogluten.com/great.asp
Great Taste No Gluten gives you the same food-pairing advice as Great Taste No Pain, plus guides for gluten free living and a collection of tasty gluten free recipes.
2- With enzyme supplementation
If you've eaten typical acid-forming, hard to digest meals for a long time (or your whole life), chances are excellent that your body's ability to produce adequate enzymes for digestion is reduced, impaired or even non-existent.
This is especially true if you've been on acid reducing medications (like the purple pill), and heaven knows that includes millions of people!
That’s why supplementation with an enzyme formula like Digestizol Max can be so helpful to so many people. 
- http://www.bluerockholistics.com/product/dmax.asp
Digestizol Max contains enzymes that target any kind of food you can eat—proteins, carbs, fats, dairy, fiber, etc., plus 5 herbs to help soothe an inflamed GI tract.
Digestizol Max can help give your body a much-needed boost to keep your digestion nice and smooth -- and help make acid reflux, GERD and Barrett's a thing of the past for you.
Other helpful suggestions
Other safe, natural measures to help soothe an inflamed GI tract and enhance digestion can include:
  •           Chiropractic treatment
  •           Meditation/prayer
  •           Yoga
  •           Acupuncture
  •           Antioxidants like Vitamin C (500 – 3,000 mg. per day is the typical recommended dose)
  •           Chewing deglycyrrhizinated licorice (DGL)—available at health food stores
  •           Omega-3 essential fatty acid supplements like VitalMega-3.  - http://www.bluerockholistics.com/product/vitalmega3.asp
Omega-3 EFAs are Nature’s anti-inflammatory, and that includes helping to soothe inflammation in your digestive tract.
VitalMega-3 can help with this very important task, as well as help encourage lower blood pressure and fewer aches and pains too! 
(Always remember to let you doctor know what supplements you are taking.)
You CAN fight and WIN
If you have Barrett’s esophagus, or if you have acid reflux/GERD that you want to help PREVENT from progressing into Barrett’s, see what a HUGE difference it can make when you take safe, natural measures to help encourage sound digestion and ease the inflammation in your GI tract.
To your health,
Sherry Brescia

PS: Cindy’s been feeling much better since 2009!

Hi Sherry:
I have been on your Great Taste No Pain plan since 2009 and it is a God sent plan for me. 
I was diagnosed with gastritis in early 2009 after having a horrible stomach virus that landed me in hospital.  I took meds for a few months but would still have times of extreme pain.  After much prayer, I found your website, ordered the books, and have been passing your message along ever since. 
At the last trip (and it was the very last trip) to the gastro doctor I mentioned that I was better because I was doing food combining.  He looked at me like I was crazy and told me he had never heard of that.  I told him maybe he should look it up!
Thank you for sharing your story and knowledge.  I give the website address to anyone I think will benefit.  I'm sure most forget about it right away and continue to take pills and more pills.  But I'll never forget the first week back in 2009 and what a difference it made in my life.  No pills, just good, healthy food combined correctly.
Thanks again and I love all your newsletters.  They are right on the money.
Sincerely,
Cindy in Georgia


Want the best probiotic on the market today? Then learn why Super Shield outshines all the rest here.

Got low energy? Brain fog? CRS disease? You just may be low in in just one vitamin. One out of four people are. Read more about this deficiency and how you can help turn that around FAST.

Years of junk foods, meats, alcohol and soft drinks results in a decrease in your body's ability to produce digestive enzymes. This can result in daily painful gas, bloating, heartburn and constipation no matter how otherwise healthy your diet is!  Digestizol Max can help turn that around for you fast. Its effective blend of 14 plant-derived enzymes and soothing herbs will help carry out the job of digestion and keep you feeling great! Learn more about Digestizol Max here.

Gluten has been linked to hundreds of health problems, including autoimmune diseases. If you are gluten sensitive or have an autoimmune disease, see what avoiding gluten can do for you.  Great Taste No Gluten will make gluten avoidance easy, while giving you 160 of the world's tastiest gluten-free recipes to make you love every bite of your gluten-free life.  Learn more about Great Taste No Gluten here.


 Haven't taken the Great Taste No Pain test drive?  Why not?  Get over to
- http://www.greattastenopain.com/freereports/ and feel the power of Great Taste No Pain.

Orders: 1-888-724-4366

Want to read past articles? Here they are.

* Forward this email to the people you care about the most!

- http://www.greattastenopain.com/great.asp
- http://www.greattastenogluten.com/great.asp
- http://www.bluerockholistics.com

(c) copyright 2013 Holistic Blends

**The FDA has not evaluated all of these statements. The contents of this email are not to be considered medical advice and are for educational purposes only. If you are experiencing health challenges, always consult your doctor for medical advice and follow it even if it contradicts the contents of this email.**

Pain-Free Living is a permission-based newsletter. The only way to receive it is to request it here  To stop getting this letter, simply use the link below and it will end automatically and immediately.


Holistic Blends Inc.
- http://www.greattastenopain.com/great.asp
PO Box 359 Syracuse, NY 13209
Ph.: 1-888-724-4366 FAX: 315-468-5818

US Gestapo to Disarm Legal Gun Owners with Nighttime No-Knock SWAT Raids

to me
Godfather Politics

We have our "Republic" back - right???

http://godfatherpolitics.com/14946/us-gestapo-disarm-legal-gun-owners-nighttime-knock-swat-raids/

US Gestapo to Disarm Legal Gun Owners with Nighttime No-Knock SWAT Raids


Hundreds of thousands, probably millions of Americans have said that they will not willingly give up their guns.  They vow to protect their Second Amendment rights to bear arms.  If necessary, patriotic Americans have promised that there will be a bloodbath before they relinquish their guns.
Our socialist president has tried to pass restrictive gun control laws, but his efforts have been thwarted by Republicans and even some Democrats.  Obama and other liberals have pushed hard for universal gun registration that would include every gun in existence in the US.  Hitler did the same thing just before his Gestapo and other forces systematically confiscated most of the firearms owned by German citizens.
So what does a socialist tyrant do when he can’t obtain a list of who owns what guns?  He turns to liberal judges and law enforcement to do his dirty work for him in the form of no-knock SWAT raids.
Last summer I reported on such a raid that happened to John Gerald Quinn of Texas.  The police had obtained information that suggested that Quinn’s son was involved with illegal drugs.  They followed the law in obtaining a search warrant for Quinn’s home.  When the SWAT team arrived, they did not knock on the door or announce their presence when they forcibly burst through the door to conduct their search.  Against normal police protocol, they executed a no-knock raid on the home.
The reason police gave for the no-knock raid was that they suspected that there might have been an AK-47 in the house.  Quinn believes that the police violated his Fourth Amendment rights by executing the no-knock raid based solely on suspicion that there was a gun in the house.
If law enforcement suspects that you or someone in your house may have committed a crime and if they suspect that there might be a firearm in the house, they are carrying out no-knock raids, generally in the middle of night when you are asleep.  If you react like I probably would and think that someone is breaking into your house and you reach for a gun to defend yourself, you will be shot.  And if they find any firearms or ammunition in the house during the raid, they will be confiscated and your chances of ever getting them back are next to none.
Back in 2008, Tracey Ingle was shot over nine times with bean bag rounds at close range when law enforcement carried out a midnight no-knock raid on his house.  Without any announcement, they burst through the front door and bedroom and entered through the bedroom window.  When Ingle reached for a gun, that turned out to be a non-working gun, they opened fire him.  He was hit in the chest, calf, arm and hip.  He suffered a shattered leg bone.  Only then did the SWAT team discover that he was Tracey and not Michael.  They raided the wrong home and violated Ingle’s 2nd Amendment right to self-defense, his 4th Amendment right of private property and his right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty which involved his 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendment rights.
If you think no-knock raids are rare, Cato Institute place the number at 40,000 a yearback in 2006 and they have steadily increased in frequency.  Every year, thousands of law abiding Americans are having their constitutional rights violated and weapons confiscated by SWAT teams executing no-knock raids.  All they need is the suspicion of a crime and suspicion of a weapon and you too may be the host of a violent nighttime raid.  This all sounds eerily similar to Nazi Germany in the 1930s and early 1940s.  Back then they were called Gestapo or SS.  Today we call them SWAT.

Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/14946/us-gestapo-disarm-legal-gun-owners-nighttime-knock-swat-raids/#4x6dmD5L7dsqlMyO.99

IS THIS A SECRETLY TAKEN PHOTO OF THE PLANE STORED IN TEL AVIV?

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

IS THIS A SECRETLY TAKEN PHOTO OF THE PLANE STORED IN TEL AVIV?
Posted By: The_Fox [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 28-Mar-2014 13:24:50

The Malaysia Air 777 with Boeing serial number 28416 and registered as 9M-MRI was sold to GA Telesis, LLC of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on October 21, 2013, and is now registered as N105GT. The aircraft was stored at Tarbes Lourdes Pyrenees on October 4, 2013, and then on November 4, 2013, it was re-registered as N105GT and stored at Tel Aviv.
http://www.bollyn.com/home/#article_14613
Taking off to its new home, -picture (taken from several others) and text taken from link.
Note the date in relation to above info.

Aéroport Tarbes-Lourdes-Pyrénées
GA Telesis: Boeing 777-2H6(ER): N105GT: MSN 28416/155.
189
November 4, 2013
link
----------
Posted 07 February 2014 - 06:31 PM
Formerly Malaysia Airlines B777-2H6ER 9M-MRI cn 28416/155. Now GA Telesis N105GT
Withdrawn from use 08-04-2013.
Stored at Aéroport Tarbes-Lourdes-Pyrénées -10-2013.
to Tel Aviv for storage 04-11-2013
link
----------
The following I found at ;
http://www.tapuz.co.il/forums2008/viewmsg.aspx?forumid=1151&messageid=172742624
and the relevant parts are translated from Hebrew using Google Translate
The picture shown is linked to this page, but wouldn't show.
It can be found at;
link
Is this pictured near its hangar? Note the identical blank tail scheme as pictured in the above photo.

Translated;
N105GT was 9M - MRI .
From: Lightning under a cloud
02.12.13 20:15
777 of Malay, ended his life and came to dismantle examined the
Lightning under a cloud
02.12.13 15:15
229 Views
º
N105GT was 9M - MRI .
Lightning under a cloud
Current message <<
02.12.13 20:15
173 Views

Ended his life ? ? He was 15 ...
idooriane
02.12.13 23:03
272 Views
777 converted cargo plane at Ben Gurion did not do IAI
Lightning under a cloud
04.12.13 22:43
146 Views
º
First you took photography forbidden territory . Secondly the 777
Noam S.
12.05.13 08:24
175 Views

Members of IAI teacher told me that this aircraft dismantling
Lightning under a cloud
12.05.13 08:42
140 Views
http://www.tapuz.co.il/forums2008/viewmsg.aspx?forumid=1151&messageid=172742624
-----------
Fox.

the Onion White House Report, 3-26-14… “White House Sends Obama To 3-Day Management Seminar”

the Onion White House Report, 3-26-14… “White House Sends Obama To 3-Day Management Seminar”

Posted on by kauilapele
This was also too good to pass up (“Time for some Lightness, baby!!”).
“The course… reportedly focused on the four C’s of management—communicate, collaborate, coordinate, and create—a framework the president described as “an easy way to remember some pretty important stuff.”
“Barack did quite well for a first-time participant,” said Davies, recalling the president’s performance during Deduction, a game in which conference-goers had to guess one another’s favorite month, animal, food, TV show, and color. “He was really earnest about his ideas, but he wasn’t afraid to use humor, either. When we asked attendees to name their biggest weakness, he said, ‘Cooking for my wife,’ which got a pretty big laugh.
“…Obama stressed that some of the best moments of the conference came when he got the opportunity to network and trade business cards with fellow attendees… when he and a few fellow attendees would head out to lunch at a nearby Panera Bread.
“I definitely picked up a few strategies that might help me out in cabinet meetings. Even if I don’t end up using that stuff every day, it’s not a big deal, because the whole thing was paid for by work.
“And at least I got three days away from the office… Hopefully I don’t have too much piled up on my desk when I get back.”
—————————————————-
White House Sends Obama To 3-Day Management Seminar At Washington Marriott
WASHINGTON—Armed with newly acquired strategies on team leadership, effective communication, and workplace sensitivity, President Barack Obama returned to the Oval Office this morning after spending the past three days at a management seminar, White House sources confirmed.
The professional-development conference reportedly took place at the Marriott Marquis in downtown Washington, where the president joined dozens of business managers from across the mid-Atlantic region for a series of presentations, workshops, and team-building activities aimed at enhancing supervisory skills and fostering confident decision-making.
“This wasn’t exactly something I wanted to do, but I figured if I was going to be there for three days I might as well make the most of it,” said Obama, noting that the seminar kicked off in the hotel’s Ballroom 2A, where he registered at the check-in table, wrote “Barack” on his name tag, and then began the first day’s session by playing the ice-breaking game Two Truths And A Lie with other attendees. “As it turns out, I got to talking to some of the other attendees, and we found out we’re faced with a lot of the same kinds of challenges, like organization and budgeting. So we bonded a little bit over that.”
“I hit it off right away with this guy Tom [Hanley, co-owner of Hanley Comprehensive Payroll Services] from Reston,” the president continued. “He runs the third-largest payroll processor in the region. We ended up sitting next to each other for most of the presentations and even grabbing a beer Tuesday in the hotel bar. Great guy.”

Obama said the seminar, called “Essentials of Effective Management: Engagement, Performance, and Execution,” used hands-on workshops to develop the creative and analytical skills of the program’s 80 attendees who represented companies from six local states and the District of Columbia, ranging from Johnson Bros. Vending to PrimeMark Commercial Real Estate. The course also reportedly focused on the four C’s of management—communicate, collaborate, coordinate, and create—a framework the president described as “an easy way to remember some pretty important stuff.”

The commander-in-chief stated that, to his surprise, he even found himself enjoying some of the seminar’s activities. In particular, Obama cited an afternoon “brain-building” exercise on day two, during which he and his teammates Don Worley and Jim Meredith, both from Baxter Tour & Travel Motorcoach Lines, were handed three seemingly random objects—a roll of tape, a tube of toothpaste, and an egg carton—and then given 30 minutes to come up with a new product and create a business model for marketing it to consumers.
In the role-playing session “Tough Scenarios,” sources said Obama was paired up with Wilmington-based PR director Mary Westgerdes and presented with a series of management predicaments to act out in front of the group, such as how to confront an employee about dressing professionally and what not to say when addressing a subordinate of the opposite gender.
OnPoint Marketing Solutions, LLC founder Ron Davies, who taught the 44th president in the workshops “Critical Thinking, Analytical Thinking” and “Managing at the Speed of Trust,” said he enjoyed watching Obama’s progress over the course of three days.
“Barack did quite well for a first-time participant,” said Davies, recalling the president’s performance during Deduction, a game in which conference-goers had to guess one another’s favorite month, animal, food, TV show, and color. “He was really earnest about his ideas, but he wasn’t afraid to use humor, either. When we asked attendees to name their biggest weakness, he said, ‘Cooking for my wife,’ which got a pretty big laugh.”
“He worked very well under Dale [Garver], his team leader,” Davies continued. “Dale’s team really stood out during our time management challenges.”
The president remarked that he particularly enjoyed the seminar’s keynote address from Pitney Bowes regional vice president Beth Meeks, saying that she “made some good points” and “seemed to reach a lot of people” with her speech, titled “Don’t Tell Your Brand’s Story: Sell Your Brand’s Story.”
But Obama stressed that some of the best moments of the conference came when he got the opportunity to network and trade business cards with fellow attendees when he bumped into them in the Marriott hallway or during their scheduled hour-long break between morning and afternoon sessions when he and a few fellow attendees would head out to lunch at a nearby Panera Bread.
“I’d say that the seminar was a good experience overall,” said the president of the United States, who received a certificate of administrative excellence for completing the three-day, $1,900 seminar. “I definitely picked up a few strategies that might help me out in cabinet meetings. Even if I don’t end up using that stuff every day, it’s not a big deal, because the whole thing was paid for by work.”
“And at least I got three days away from the office, which was nice,” he added. “Hopefully I don’t have too much piled up on my desk when I get back.”

Share: