Obama wants more than $18,113,000,000,000.00 debt

Obama wants more than $18,113,000,000,000.00 debt

Treasury secretary warns Congress to raise borrowing limit

Published: 18 hours ago

Bob Unruh

The Obama administration this week is warning Congress that it needs to raise the nation’s debt ceiling – the maximum the government can legally borrow – beyond its current $18,113,000,000,000.00 because officials already are having to juggle the books to keep the balance in the black.

The issue repeatedly has been the source of conflict in Washington, with a standoff in 2011 leading to a downgrade in the nation’s credit rating by one rating agency and another in 2013 developing into a two-week shutdown of some portions of government when Barack Obama refused to negotiate with Congress.
Now, according to CNN, Treasure Secretary Jack Lew has dispatched to leaders of the legislative bodies a letter telling them they need to raise the ceiling and soon.
Or lawmakers could, according to another plan, from the Government Accountability Office, simply eliminate the ceiling entirely.
To give the president virtually unlimited borrowing authority.
The recent GAO report said such a move would eliminate the possibility there would be no money available to pay interest on the nation’s debt when it comes due.
Reported CNN, “This scenario would also reduce the potential for disruptions to financial markets well before a deadline that approaches for defaulting on the debt.”
Tired of more borrowing by Washington? Want to do something about it? Join the No More Red Ink campaign now.
The current debt ceiling of $18,113,000,000,000.00 was reached in mid-March, but administration officials say they are operating the government on “extraordinary measures” for now – essentially transferring funds around, utilizing those accounts with balances and delaying scheduled payments for things like retirement benefit accounts.
Estimates are now that those mechanisms will expire sometime probably in October.
Lew told members of Congress, “We believe that the measures will not be exhausted before late October, and it is likely that they will last for at least a brief additional period of time.
According to AP, the current national debt stands only pocket change – $25 million – below the limit.
Lew told Congress he wants to get his way “without controversy or brinksmanship.”
And he warned that because of the the variables in the economy, “Treasury is not able to provide a specific estimate of how long the extraordinary measures will last.”
The debt ceiling already has been raised 74 times in the last five decades, including five times so far under Obama.
Congress had passed the Temporary Debt Limit Extension Act in February 2014 and that simply suspended the debt limit for Obama. But that expired in March of this year, and the new limit of $18,113,000,000,000.00 was set.
The national debt clock recently (the numbers change constantly) estimated that the debt liabilities per person totaled $57,026. But because there are many who do not pay taxes, the per taxpayer liability is $154,433.
The routine of borrowing and spending more and more is being targeted, too, by a special No More Red Ink campaign.
It points out that because of the GOP majority in the U.S. House, there are 246 members, they could simply refuse to authorize additional borrowing, and trigger one of the biggest cutbacks in federal spending ever.
It also would tell the world members of Congress are addressing the “debt time bomb” that America is facing.
Launched by WND CEO Joseph Farah, the programs notes the debt limit issue is the “greatest opportunity to return American to constitutionally limited government.”
“Do you want to stop passing on debt to our children and grandchildren – money that is frittered away on useless, wasteful and unconstitutional departments, agencies and bureaucracies that benefit no one except the power brokers in Washington?” he asks. “The only option – the only game in town – is this ‘No More Red Ink’ campaign. It’s the only way for you to reach every single member of the House Republican caucus inexpensively, securely and with an investment of about one minute of your time.”
He points out it doesn’t taken any Democratic cooperation – 218 GOP members alone can halt more borrowing.
Tired of more borrowing by Washington? Want to do something about it? Join the No More Red Ink campaign now.

http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/obama-admin-wants-more-than-18113000000000-00-debt/

CASHLESS SOCIETY: Once cash is banned .....

THE NEW WORLD ORDER MOVING SPEEDILY FORWARD AGAINST THE PEOPLE:

Once cash is banned they will be able to force you to buy products: “Just tax their excess account balance”

  May 19, 2015 3:47 am EDT

By Mac Slavo | SHTFPlan.com

In recent weeks we’ve seen numerous reports of how banks are actively working with governments to restrict cash usage. JP Morgan Chase, one of the world’s largest banks, has advised their customers that storing cash in their safe deposit boxes is no longer allowed – for your safety, of course.

The new policy sounds ridiculous but makes complete sense when you consider that you would then be left with no other choice than to hold your money exclusively in your bank account, where the bank will simply charge you for the privilege of depositing your funds in their fine financial institution.

Any normal working class individual would have the same reaction you’re problem having right now to this news: take your cash out of the bank.

While that may sound like a great plan, it turns out that bank employees have been told by the 'government' (CRIMINAL CABAL CORPORATION POSING AS YOUR GOVERNMENT) that they should be reporting to law enforcement officials any suspicious looking cash transactions, especially withdrawals, even if they are for just a couple of thousand dollars so that enforcement agents can then seize those funds.

They want to ensure total control and by controlling your cash flow, they control you. 

It’s as simple as that. As noted below, the ideal situation for the world’s central bankers and governments is a total ban on cash transactions. It is, after all, the 21st century. Who needs cash when you have a debit card or phone payment systems?

Plus, there’s 'terrorism' to contend with and we all know that only 'terrorists', 'criminals' and 'shady underworld types' use cash. (FOLKS, THAT'S THEIR DEFINITIOIN OF YOU AND ME - NOT THEM - THE TRUE CRIMINALS.)

Moreover, in the event the 'President' or other bureaucrat declares a financial crisis, the 'government' can move with unprecedented speed to stabilize the system by simply compelling you to spend money to boost economic activity. And by “compelling” we mean forcing you through direct taxation and withdrawal of your funds.

If their intentions are not yet obvious, then the following report from Zero Hedge should make it perfectly clear.

At this stage, a sane person might be tempted to call it a day on the monetary experiments, especially considering that, at this point, the limits have been reached. That is, there are literally no more assets to buy and rates have hit the effective lower bound where rational actors will eschew bank deposits in favor of the mattress.

But not so fast, say folks like Citi’s Willem Buiter and economist Ken Rogoff: the world could always ban cash because if you eliminate physical currency and force people to use a debit card linked to a government controlled bank account for all transactions, you can effectively centrally plan everything. Consumers not spending? No problem. Just tax their excess account balance. Economy overheating? Again, no problem. Raise the interest paid on account holdings to encourage people to stop spending.

So with Citi, Harvard, and Denmark all onboard, we bring you the latest call for a cashless society, this time from German economist and member of the German Council Of Economic Experts Peter Bofinger.  Via Spiegel (Google translated):

Coins and bills are obsolete and only reduce the influence of central banks. This position represents the economy Peter Bofinger. The federal government should stand up for the abolition of cash, he calls in the mirror…

The economy Peter Bofinger campaigns for the abolition of cash. “With today’s technical possibilities coins and notes are in fact an anachronism,” Bofinger told SPIEGEL.
If these away, the markets for undeclared work and drugs could be dried out. In addition, it would have the central banks easier to enforce its monetary policy.The teaching in Würzburg economics professor called on the federal government to promote at the international level for the abolition of cash. “That would certainly be a good topic for the agenda of the G-7 summit in Elmau,” he said. (Click here to read the full interview in the new mirror .)
Even the former US Treasury Secretary Larry Summers and economist pleaded for an end to the already cash . Likewise, the US economist Kenneth Rogoff . He also argued that the interest rates of central banks have less clout when banks or consumer credit rather than hoard cash.
Critics warn, however , such debates would only distract from the real problems of the current monetary policy.

The idea is that either you start spending your money like a good Patriotic American according to the rules and regulations, or the 'government' would just take it from you and reappropriate it as they see fit. ('START'??  THIS IS ALREADY BEING DONE!)

But such a thing could never happen in America – that the 'government' could force a private citizen to purchase a product or service, or face financial penalties and even jail time – right?'

To answer this question we direct you to the Patient Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare.

Besides, you don’t own that money you’re depositing at the bank anyway, because once you deposit those funds, according to new banking rules, you become a creditor to your financial institution and they can pretty much do whatever they want with what was formerly your money.

We can see that governments around the world are feverishly working to marginalize cash and criminalize those who use it.  Naturally, that will force those who prefer to keep their spending habits outside of the purview of prying 'government' eyes to go underground. 

Currency mechanisms like gold, silver, food, medicine, Bitcoin blockchains and other bartererable trade goods may become the cash du jour should the trend continue.
****************************
AMERICANS NEED TO GET CREATIVE - GET OUTSIDE THE NWO CRIMINAL SYSTEM - STATES DISSOLVE THEIR CORPORATION FEDERAL STATUS AND IMMEDIATELY REVERT TO THEIR TRUE REPUBLIC - INDIVIDUAL NATION STATUS FREE OF CORPORATE WASHINGTON DC - AND PROVIDE A BANKING SYSTEM FOR THE PEOPLE OF THEIR REPUBLIC NATION THAT CAN BE USED INTER-REPUBLIC NATIONS 
THERE IS NO NEED FOR ANY TIES TO THE CRIMINAL PHONY FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

https://www.intellihub.com/once-cash-is-banned-they-will-be-able-to-force-you-to-buy-products-just-tax-their-excess-account-balance/

 

IN PROCESS NOW! Larry Summers and the coming cashless society - learn about it

Negative Interest Rates & Eliminating Cash – The Summers’ Solution

 

AMERICA - YOU ARE ONCE AGAIN BEING SCREWED BY YOUR CRIMINAL CABAL PHONY 'GOVERNMENT' AND THE BANKSTERS - IT IS GOING TO HURT YOU BIG TIME

 

A speech delivered by Larry Summers at the IMF Research Conference on Nov. 8 (2014) has caused a real stir and is being hailed as brilliant, succinct, and a ground-breaking presentation that explained what many say is the most pressing economic matter of our time. The speech is being widely praised of course by Paul Krugman who never saw other people’s money as their property but really just a toy of the state for their manipulating pleasure.

As it is being now argued, over the past 50 years the Federal Reserve has cut short-term interest rates during recessions to spur economic growth. However, the new problem has arisen where the government (Fed) has lost its power to control society. Summers has now argued that if another recession were to hit in the next couple of years, the Fed will have even less power to combat such a decline since rates are already at zero. This is what Summers warned of in his speech at the IMF that the “real” interest rate should be NEGATIVE.

Summers is trapped in this idea that the 'Fed/ Government' can even play a roll in this Marxist/ Keynesian world manipulating society like mice in a maze. He claims the problem is that the natural interest rate — where investment and savings bring about full employment — is now NEGATIVE! He grasps the problem that the Fed cannot cut the nominal rate BELOW zero because people will choose to hoard money instead of putting it in the bank. 

This he calls the zero lower boundary and has reduced the power of Fed policy. To offset this zero lower boundary, the Fed has employed unconventional programs such as quantitative easing (QE) to push long-term rates down to try to bring about greater investment. However, QE at the Fed buying billions of dollars of Treasuries failed to stimulate because of the international money supply that did not take into account that buying in 30 year bonds did not offset the deflation when the seller was foreign. Insofar as the buying the mortgage-backed securities, the Fed again is only praying the banks will lower rates and lend and has no direct control over any stimulating policy.

According to Summer, the natural interest rate remains BELOW zero even with the QE measures sterilizing any action of the Fed. Reducing short-term interest rates is the Fed’s greatest power according to Summers under Monetarism to bring about full employment during recessions. However, the Fed has been hamstrung by this zero-lower boundary resulting in a weaker recovery thus far. Consequently, Summer sees the larger problem is that this is not a short-term issue but systemic. He argues that should another recession hit right now, the Fed will be impudent. This is what Summers warned of in his speech at the IMF.

“Imagine a situation where natural and equilibrium interest rates have fallen significantly below zero,” Summers said. “Then conventional macroeconomic thinking leaves us in a very serious problem because we all seem to agree that whereas you can keep the federal funds rate at a low level forever, it’s much harder to do extraordinary measures beyond that forever, but the underlying problem may be there forever.”

Now, here is where Summers is dead wrong because quite frankly people like him are career government people and lack the experience of really seeing how the world functions from both sides. Summers, like everyone else in government, has completely ignored what Keynes also said was a vital tool to manipulate society – taxes.  

Interest rates are only the Monetarist side of the coin where as Keynes was concerned about the fiscal side – government spending. Keynes argued that it was DEMAND that declined during a depression and that could be overcome by government moving into a deficit. But deficits are now systemic and politicians have turned to the Fed to sterilize their fiscal mismanagement using Monetarism since the Fed is incapable of controlling fiscal spending – Keynesianism.

Summers now assumes that the problem is systemic, but not that the deficits are chronic, just that the Fed now needs to go NEGATIVE to stop people from “hoarding” and that will force them to spend. But this is ignoring the rising tax burden that REDUCES disposable income assuming people are just hoarding cash. 

His solution is to now eliminate cash, forcing everyone to use electronic money and that will stop hoarding by penalizing people for saving.



All of this is perfectly logical for the 'elites' who see themselves as manipulating society like a mouse in a maze searching for the cheese. They ignore TAXES entirely, and do not see that their own chronic systemic deficits have eliminated Keynesianism for they never pay anything back and borrow year-after-year competing with the private sector for cash that would otherwise create employment. Now they see the solution as eliminating all cash and then penalizing savers with NEGATIVE interest rates. Ah ha! Brilliant! That will force the bastards to spend money and stop saving for a rainy day. Gee – it’s just genius. So simple any moron (that's you and me America) could have figure that one out.

   Unfortunately, this will merely fail on a grand scale for then the giant 800 pound gorilla in the corner of the room will be national debts. Who will buy government bonds with a NEGATIVE return? How will the Pension funds even survive? What happened to Andrew Mellon’s famous quote – Gentlemen Prefer Bonds?

Summers’ speech is being hailed in government circles as absolutely brilliant. Why? Because it still leaves the reins of power vested in the hands of government. In no way does it suggest that government is the problem. It ignores the entire pension fund crisis and assumes that bankers will now get to charge people for using their money. Brilliant! Absolutely brilliant! The bankers make more money and do not have to lend anything – just trade with your money keeping the profits themselves as always. The government retains the reins of power and both are happy. And the people get penalized for having any savings at all. Gosh – this is so amazing, it beats at last Charles Ponzi’s scheme that was used for Social Security.

The problem is cash, according to Summers. We need a cashless society is his solution. Now government gets all its taxes and can charge you to think you even have money. The die-hard people indoctrinated by the gold promoters cannot see that we are in a MASSIVE deflationary cycle? Come on. Forget hyperinflation. These people are economic strip-miners. There will be nothing standing by the time they are finished. It is not he who has the gold makes the rules – it is he who makes the rules confiscates all the gold.

Cheer up – it can only get worse. You are living the good life right now. Enjoy it while you can! It will not last much longer. When the economy turns down after 2015.75, Summers is right on point about one thing. The Fed has NO power under Monetarism left in its bags of tricks.
Sorry Larry! Negative rates will not work, either and then what do you do with the pension funds and national debts? Oh ya – that is Phase II after the Safe Act. Sorry, I forget. You then just confiscate the pension funds (Social Security Disability, retirement plans, etc.) and retire the national debt so you can invade whoever you desire. Gee. How stupid of me to forget the real agenda here.

  (see Deutsche-Wrtschafts-Nachrichten)

http://www.armstrongeconomics.com/archives/15764 

 

Your action needed urgently!

 

SENATE TO VOTE TO 

DEFUND PLANNED 

PARENTHOOD

 

MURDER OF THE INNOCENT AND

DEFENSELESS FOR PROFIT

 

Friday, July 31, 2015

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has said the U.S. Senate will vote next week on a bill to completely defund Planned Parenthood Federation of America, following four shocking videos showing the abortion provider actively engages in the harvesting and selling of the body parts of aborted babies. See earlier alert here.

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) quickly garnered at least 32 co-sponsors for S. 1881: A bill to prohibit Federal funding of Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

The key language of the bill reads, "...no Federal funds may be made available to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, or to any of its affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, or clinics."

Now is the best opportunity we've ever had to finally defund Planned Parenthood the $540 million dollars they receive from taxpayers! The bill will instead direct that money to organizations that provide for women's health – but don't abort unborn children.

As barbaric as Planned Parenthood's actions are, there are some senators who want to continue funding it with YOUR tax dollars.

It is critical that you contact your senators today and urge them as strongly as possible to vote in favor of S. 1881, to protect women's health and defund Planned Parenthood!

TAKE ACTION

CALL your senators now! 

A phone call is the strongest, most effective action you can take. You can quickly and easily find your senator's phone number here. Simple enter your zip code under "Find Officials."

At the very least, send an email to your senators. We have provided a pre-written message for you to automatically send to both of them. You can also add a personal message.
Urge your senators to vote in favor of S. 1881, to protect women's health and defund Planned Parenthood!

Call or email your Senators NOW!



Tim Wildmon, President
American Family Association

Battle Over Banking: A Public Bank for the Republic of Vermont by Jim Hogue

Battle Over Banking: A Public Bank for the Republic of Vermont by Jim Hogue

This article was first published in Green Mountain Noise, 2VR’s E-zine publication

Introduction
In 1694, British Financiers formed the Bank of England and changed the world. Public money in the form of tally sticks ended. Villains had been practicing usury for centuries, “as loan oft loses both itself and friend, and borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.” But “banking” made for the best of all possible worlds.
The English crown needed money to prosecute its wars. The owners of the Bank of England had it. From their reserves in gold, they created and then lent to the crown, at interest, whatever amount the crown wanted. The changed world would henceforth be on a “war footing.” The devastations, waste, and tragedies of war were eventually spun into “good for the economy.”
Usury was bad. Banking was good.
But many did not fall for it:  Franklin, Jefferson and Paine to name three. The refusal of the founding patriots to pay tribute to the institution that extracted money from the colonies was the primary cause of the War of Independence. Their continued refusal helped cause the War of 1812.
Enter Vermont. A state since 1791, Vermont had minted her own coins during her 14 years of independence. From that time until 1806, the people of Vermont used a potpourri of currencies, many issued by private banks from neighboring states. The problems of usury, fraud, discounted notes, counterfeiting, bad debt, along with inefficient and unreliable means of buying and selling seemed unsolvable. Vermont did not have a bank, either public or private, and thereby hangs a tale.

Part I: The Vermont State Bank
In 1803 the Vermont legislature, Governor Tichenor, and his council took up the banking question. Though the legislature passed a bill 98-93 in favor of bank charters for Windsor and Burlington, the governor and council “non-concurred” and published arguments against banking and submitted them to the legislature. Read the story of the bank’s formation as described by George B. Reed in “Sketch of the Early History of Banking in Vermont.”[1]
Among the 8 reasons for disallowing banks in Vermont, were
#3  “Banks, by facilitating enterprises both hazardous and unjustifiable, are a natural source of all that class of vices which arise from the gambling system and which cannot fail to act as sure and fatal, though slow, poisons to the republic in which they exist.”
#5  “Banks have a violent tendency, in their natural operation, to draw into the hands of the few a large proportion of the property at present fortunately diffused among the many. The tendency of banks seems to be to weaken the great pillars of a republican government, and at the same time to increase the forces employed for its overthrow.”
#6  “As banks will credit none but persons of affluence, those who are in greatest need of help cannot expect to be directly accommodated by them.”
In 1804, the Vermont legislature recommended that the arguments regarding banking be put before the people, and that a vote on a banking bill be held in 1805. This was done, and the proponents of banking made a good case that banks would solve the many problems that Vermonters faced, including counterfeiting, inefficiency, and the draining of capital by out-of-state (“foreign”) banks.
In 1805, supporters presented petitions for banks in Windsor and Burlington, and Titus Hutchinson backed a bill “establishing a State (public) Bank.”  Though the legislature passed it, the governor and council did not concur. It was agreed “that the General Assembly should go into such a consideration of the subject as shall lead to a thorough investigation of its principles, practicability and policy.”  This was done and sent to a committee of five, and then dismissed.
1806 proved the year. “Petitions to the legislature for bank charters were numerous.”  The legislature voted on petitions for private banks, which lost by two votes, after which a bill was introduced to establish “The Vermont State Bank.” This bill “passed by a large majority, the governor and council concurring.”  Branches were established in Woodstock and Middlebury. Section six of the bill insured a 100% reserve in specie up to “twenty five thousand dollars, after which they may put in circulation bills to three times that amount of such deposit, provided said deposit shall not exceed three hundred thousand dollars.” The charter insured that the officers of the bank adhere to sound and prudent policy, monitored by a committee from the legislature.
In 1807, the directors’ report concluded “The obstacles that were inseparable from an institution established on principles hitherto unattempted in the banking system  (emphasis mine) have been happily surmounted and the practicability of those principles established. The high credit and extensive circulation of our bills, we trust, are sufficient to inspire the public confidence, and to insure a continuance of their patronage. Under the fostering care of the legislature, we are induced to believe that this institution may become highly conducive to the convenience of the citizens, and a productive source of revenue to the state.”
Two more branches were added:  Burlington and Westminster.
Profits of the Bank:
1808 – $11,171.44
1809 – $22,412.48
1810 – $33.066.19
1811 – $44,769.11
The banks proved successful despite the many impediments thrown at Vermont by neighboring states and their private banks.
In the words of Governor Galusha in 1809 in his message to the House:
It will deserve your attention. The failure of several private banks in the vicinity of this state, the rejecting our bills by the law of one state and the policy and caprice of others, has embarrassed our mercantile intercourse with the adjoining states. . . .The manner to be pursued to meet or remove these impediments I leave to your consideration. It will be remembered by many that I was not amongst those that favoured the institution of country banks; but it is apparent that the establishment of a public bank in this state has saved many of our citizens from great losses, and probably some from total ruin – for it is obvious that but for this establishment, in lieu of our own Vermont bank bills, our citizens would on the late bankruptcies have been possessed of large sums of depreciated paper of the failing private banks. . . .”
The House reciprocated the Governor’s sentiments, and so it seemed that the state was well committed to the continuation of the bank and the well being of her citizens. The bank enriched the state of Vermont and her people for several years, but the pressures from outside influences caused the legislature eventually to cave in. In 1812, they took steps to dissolve the bank. The “Sketch” by George B Read, from which I have quoted thus far, leaves the rest to speculation, implying that a majority of the legislators had lost both their backbones and their senses. Further research from other sources, in particular History of Woodstock Vermont 1761-1886 by Henry Swan Dana, provided a comprehensible account of the bank’s end, summarized in the paragraphs below.
Titus Hutchinson, representative from Woodstock and one of the originators of the idea of a Vermont Public Bank, valued the experiment thus:
No monarch lurked beneath the folds of such a institution as the one proposed; for it would be in the hands not of a corporation of soulless individuals, but of the true friends of the people, who, moreover . . .  would have the means at command to make more friends to themselves for the protection of the commonwealth. Then, as a further and more important consideration, the bank in its operations would be limited only by law. Out of reasons like these, to adduce no additional motives, grew The Vermont State Bank.
Gold, copper and silver were deposited in exchange for the bills printed by the bank. Still, there was great fear that the bills were not backed up by a responsible entity. The private banks did not give this new invention “a welcome, feel a common interest in it and afford to the circulation of its paper that facility which they impart to the notes of one another.”  Furthermore, “The moneyed of Boston, who ruled the whole of Massachusetts, waged uncommon war against the country banks, and especially against the Vermont State Bank.”
Counterfeiters re-emerged, like Stephen Burroughs in Canada who flooded the state with “Burroughs shags.” Private banks that failed owed them money. There was a lack of local produce on which to spend the money in state, so the bills were spent afar and then redeemed for specie at the bank by representatives (runners) of the “foreign” banks. Federal lawyers and merchants, it seems, borrowed large sums of money from the bank, conspired to discredit the bills, and, when the bills were discredited, they bought them at a large discount and then paid their debts, pocketing the extra money that they had bought up cheep. It’s possible, however, that the bank’s demise was due to excessive amounts of bills in circulation as a ratio to the reserves in the bank. So their value fell below par. People feared that the president and directors of the bank could be sued for breach of contract, and any judgment rendered against them would be paid by the state treasurer.
I would like to be able to point to a definitive event, such as the assassinations of Lincoln and Kennedy (ending government issuance of Green Backs and Silver Certificates, respectively) or the wars against Iraq and Libya (ending their independent state currencies), or the great fire in Parliament burning the tally sticks. But one can see from the events surrounding the demise of the Vermont State Bank that any of the several events cited in this article could have been the reason. If Titus Hutchinson had been clairvoyant, he might have predicted the extent of corruption involved in the control of the money supply. The struggle involved in money creation and the profits thereof (seigniorage) raged at the time and remained in open debate from colonial times through the early 1800s through Presidents Madison, Jackson, Lincoln, Wilson, and Kennedy. They all knew that money creation was a serious, deadly game. “The money powers prey upon the nation in times of peace and conspire against it in times of adversity,” Lincoln noted. “They are more despotic than monarchy, more insolent than autocracy.”[2]
Today, we see clearly the results of the victory of the money powers over all, and the arrogant corruption that is its essence.  Rolling Stone journalist Matt Taibbi is the most recent of many observers – G. Edward Griffin, Smedley Butler, John Perkins, Greg Palast and Ellen Brown – to expose the collusion among the money powers and congress, the judiciary, and the presidency. It is neither quaint nor curious that the press at large cannot bring itself to follow the lead of those who have laid out these uncomfortable truths. It is treasonous. Woodrow Wilson said it after he signed the unconstitutional Federal Reserve Act of 1913 into law.[3] With the signing into law of that act, the money powers gained control of the three branches of government. JFK trumped them when he issued Silver Certificates; but this development, for the money powers, was a mere bump in the road. The utter failure of congress, the judiciary, the executive, the constabulary, and the press to investigate and prosecute those responsible for the murder of JFK proved that the United States was ruled by an untouchable, unspeakable, higher power, as Presidents Lincoln and Wilson described.

More to Read:
http://2vr.org/2014/05/26/battle-over-banking-a-public-bank-for-the-republic-of-vermont-by-jim-hogue/

Asset Forfeiture is the New Shakedown

Asset Forfeiture is the New Shakedown

Civil asset forfeiture reform gains momentum country wide

by Jakari Jackson | Infowars.com | July 30, 2015

Jakari Jackson breaks down one of the most uncivilized and preposterous loopholes in America, which allows law enforcement to steal citizens’ assets.

http://www.infowars.com/asset-forfeiture-is-the-new-shakedown/ 

Remains of Nazi doctor’s horror ‘human collection’ recovered in France

REMAINS  OF  NAZI  DOCTOR’S  HORROR   ‘HUMAN  COLLECTION’  RECOVERED  IN  FRANCE  

 

Published time: 20 Jul, 2015 14:21

 

August Hirt © Wikipedia

 

 

Several pieces of the horrible collection of human parts collected by Nazi anatomy professor August Hirt have been discovered in France. They were apparently forgotten when most were buried in the wake of World War II. 

 

Hirt, an SS captain serving as head of the Institute of Forensic Medicine of Strasbourg during the occupation of the eastern French city by the Nazis, harvested remains of 86 victims of gassed in August 1943 in Natzweiler-Struthof Concentration Camp.

The macabre collection of corpses was meant to serve proof of Nazi’s racial theory as taught by the Ahnenerbe organization, demonstrating the anatomy of Jewish people. Jews were the majority of the anatomist’s victims, although there were a handful of Poles and Asians of disputed origin.

After Strasbourg was liberated by the Allies in November 1944, the bodies preserved in bins filled with distilled alcohol were found in Hirt’s lab. They were autopsied and eventually buried in a common grave at a local Jewish cemetery in 1946.

But on July 9, historian Raphael Toledano found that some of the remains were still at the institute, AFP reported on Saturday. He discovered several body parts, including a jar containing several skin fragments and test tubes containing the intestine and stomach of a victim.

"The labels identify each piece with precision and

mention the register 107969, which matches the number tattooed at the Auschwitz camp on the forearm of Menachem Taffel, one of the 86 victims," said the statement announcing the bodies' discovery.

Ironically, the body parts were preserved not by Hirt, but by a forensic professor from Strasbourg's medicine faculty, Camille Simonin, who was investigating the Nazi scientist’s crimes. They were taken during the autopsies of the collection as the medic was establishing the cause of the victim’s deaths for the military administration.

Toledano, who co-authored a documentary film on Hirt’s crimes, was given a clue to the location of the remains by one of Simonin’s letters written in 1952.

The newly-discovered remains are to be returned to the Jewish community of Strasbourg, where they will be interred along with the rest of the victims at the Cronenbourg cemetery.

In addition to the 86 people slaughtered to become Hirt’s exhibits, the Nazi professor harmed other prisoners, whom he used as test subjects in his chemical weapons experiments.  

 

Some 150 people became his victims in that way, with seven or eight recorded killed during the tests.
Hirt escaped the advancing Allied forces to southern Germany until June 1945, when he killed himself to avoid arrest and trial for war crimes.

http://www.rt.com/news/310271-nazi-professor-human-collection/ 

READ MORE: Google ‘Nazi death camps’ game incurs furious backlash from Holocaust survivor groups