Pass this information out to everybody as far and wide as you can.... DNC/Liberals/ Voter Fraud...

Will the Clinton/Liberals/DNC Criminals STEAL the election by voter Fraud? For that matter when did the people of America authorize the Government to take control of the voting out of the hands of the people? Originally Vote counting was done by the people and then the government was informed of the results, today the Government (in biased and honest right?) tells the people who they elected… With all the proof of the built in voter fraud by the Government, we the people need to rise up and take back our vote! Articles below tell you how you can do that… and By the Way, the DNC/Liberals are doing everything they can to stop an honest election… What will you do? Sit back and wait for somebody else to do the work, or will you take Action yourself by doing something?

Do you want criminals to continue to control the Country while they steal your rights away from you? Now is the chance to change that… but what will YOU do?

San Pedro, California: A man discovered two large packages at his mailbox that contained 83 unused 2016 ballots, each addressed to different people, all supposedly living in a neighbor’s two-bedroom apartment. The county Registrar who oversees elections passed it off as an isolated systems error. [A systems error. Yeah, that’s it.] Fox News 2016 Nov 3 (Story) (Cached)

US: Bev Harris of Black Box Voting gives step-by-step instructions for how to get an accurate vote count from voting machines. All it requires is that you tale a blank USB flash drive to the Election Registrar’s office on the day after the election and ask that it be loaded with digital files called ‘ballot images’. The law requires that your request be honored. What you do with those files is not complicated, but the process will be feasible only for those with fair computer skills. Fortunately, this does not have to be done by everyone to put honesty back into the system. If only 3% of the voters (our estimate) did this, vote fraud could be exposed, which is the first step toward eliminating it. Black Box Voting 2016 Nov 2 (Story) (Cached)

US: Bev Harris, an expert on vote-machine fraud, says that almost all ballot-counting machines in the US now are programmed to rig elections by changing vote counts and that they can be remotely activated at any time by a very small cadre of technicians. These machines are manufactured by companies financially linked to George Soros. Harris says that citizens can fight against fraud by requesting ballot images on a USB stick on the day after elections. [See the following story for instructions on how to do that.] InfoWars 2016 Nov 1 (Story) (Cached)

Roger Stone’s ‘Stop the Steal’ is a volunteer program to perform exit polls on election day. The goal is to establish whether the officially reported vote is fair or rigged. The international standard for elections is that there can be no more than a 2% deviance if the votes are fairly counted. A wider discrepancy can be the basis for a legal challenge and re-count. [You can volunteer for this program at: StopTheSteal.org. InfoWars posted 2016 Oct 31 (Story)
 
Democratic Party officials are suing Donald Trump to shut down a poll-monitoring effort they claim is designed to harass minority voters. They are trying to stop any semblance of a fair and honest election or in having their voter fraud efforts being documented. They also are suing Roger Stone, a Trump ally, who is organizing exit-polls, a project called ‘Stop the Steal’. Reuters 2016 Oct 31 (Story) (Cached)

Texas: Here is video proof from an earlier election that vote machines can (and do) flip the votes. InfoWars 2016 Oct 29 (Story)

Julian Assange says that a newly released Wikileaks cable is the most damning of all in the Podesta collection. It shows that Hillary and the Democrat Party leadership knows that ISIS is funded by the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar who also gave millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary headed the State Department. Hillary, in turn, approved the sale of massive amounts of weapons to the Saudis who ultimately armed ISIS. Assange now believes that Trump will not be permitted to win the election, because Hillary is supported by the media, banks, weapons dealers, intelligence agencies, and many foreign countries. Russia Insider 2016 Nov 4 (Story)

Wikileaks revealed another Clinton Foundation pay-to-play scheme, this one with Victor Pinchuk, a Ukrainian oligarch who paid the Clinton Foundation $29 million in return for political favors from the Clintons. The Duran 2016 Nov 2 (Story) (Cached)

Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Dr. Steve Pieczenik, says that the Wikileaks emails exposing the crimes of Hillary Clinton did not come from Russia but from intelligence officers in the FBI and CIA. He calls this a ‘counter-coup’ against the Clintons who are incredibly corrupt. Steve Pieczenik 2016 Nov 1 (Story)
              ▼
Dr. Steve Pieczenik says that Hillary and Bill Clinton often were guests on the ‘Lolita Express’, a plane owned by Jeff Epstein, a billionaire developer and convicted sex offender. The flights were made to a private island-retreat in the Bahamas used for sex orgies with underage minors. He says the Clintons are pedophiles, that the NYPD has records of their activities, and that Hillary will be charged with pedophilia and obstruction of justice. [Normally, we would not publish a report of this kind without independent confirmation that it is true, but it is certain that Pieezenic knows he would face serious legal consequences if he could not prove his charges in court.]  Steve Pieczenik 2016 Nov 1 (Story)

US: Peter Kadzik is the Justice Department official who is supervising the re-opened investigation of Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information after 650,000 emails were found on Anthony Weiner’s computer. Kadzik is a long-time Clinton-camp ally and represented Podesta during Bill Clinton’s scandal with Monica Lewisnky. Kadzik lobbied Bill Clinton to grant a pardon to tax-evading billionaire, Marc Rich, who then made hefty donations to the Clintons. [In our editorial last week, we expressed the view that re-opening the investigation likely was merely a political distraction without substance. The appointment of Kadzik to investigate Hillary’s misconduct confirms that view.] The Hayride 2016 Nov 1 (Story) (Cached)

US: Donna Brazile, who was a CNN contributor at the same time she was the vice-chair of the Democratic National Committee, was forced to resign from CNN when it was learned that she gave Hillary Clinton advance knowledge of questions to be asked of her during the candidate debates with Bernie Saunders. The DNC is now facing a class action lawsuit for fraud and other charges related to violating the DNC’s own bylaws which require total neutrality in such matters. [In the photo attached to this article. Brazile is shown giving the classic Communist closed-fist salute.] Heavy 2016 Oct 31 (Story) (Cached)

Wikileaks revealed that Tom Nides, who was Deputy Secretary of State under Hillary, sent an email to John Podesta, stating, “Every God damn cabinet officer and White House staff uses [their] gmail account.” The motive for using private email is to avoid Freedom-of-Information-Act requests that, otherwise, could force government officials to disclose their messages. Nides also suggested to Podesta that the Clinton campaign get a State Department lawyer to go through Hillary’s emails and delete the official ones. Daily Caller 2016 Oct 31 (Story) (Cached)

Hillary’s political favors for the king of Morocco while she was Secretary-of-State led to $28-million in ‘donations’ to the Clinton Foundation. One of those favors was having the EPA shut down the largest phosphate-mining company in the US, which just happened to be the major competitor with Morocco’s state-owned phosphate-mining company. Daily Caller 2016 Oct 31 (Story) (Cached)

ANALYSIS

News and commentaries that reveal historical facts and trends that place current events into perspective and make it possible to anticipate future events.

Stefan Molyneux offers eye-opening statistics to confirm what we already know instinctively, which is that leaders of the Democrat party are trying to overwhelm the US population of European descent with welfare dependents from Third-World countries. The reason is simple. Third-World migrants on welfare have no affinity to traditional American concepts of independence, free enterprise, and personal liberty. They are happy to be obedient servants of government leaders who are seen as providers and protectors. In short, they are expected to vote the nation into the New World Order. The population of European-descent will decline to less than half of the total by 2050. Stefan Molyneux 2016 Oct 29 (Story)

There are cities in the US that have been overtaken by Muslim migrant refugees who are shifting the culture away from traditional American values. Dearborn, Michigan, which is now 40% Muslim, is an example. Almost all of the signs in storefronts are in Arabic, and women are dressed in full-length burquas. The US government is secretly moving in refugees who have no intention of assimilating. This is done through private charities that are funded by government grants. The so-called charities that are planting these immigrants in southeast Michigan are Lutheran Services/Samaritas, Catholic Charities of Southeast Michigan, USRI, and Episcopal Migration Services. WND posted 2016 Oct 29 (Story) (Cached)

Hillary Clinton : WHAT ELSE are we going to find out????

Hillary  Clinton :   WHAT  ELSE  are  we  going  to  find  out  about  Hillary  Clinton,  the  U.S.A.  'government' and military,  the  politicians and  business  leaders  ????

And the "Spirit Cooking" has been going on behind our backs along with worldwide pedophelia, money laundering, murders and lies????

Hillary Tied to Bizarre Occult

"Spirit Cooking" Ritual

Hillary Clinton "Spirit Cooking" Satanic Ritual

Spirit Cooking Only The Start 

To Hillary Clinton's Dark Satanic Magic

Spirit Cooking? Politics & Satanic Rituals

David Icke

Skousen: BOGUS CLAIMS OF AN INTERNET COUP TO SAVE THE REPUBLIC

Here is Joel Skousen’s analysis and take on the “Internet Coup”.  Another PsyOp on the American People?

World Affairs Brief, November 4, 2016 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen's World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com).

CAUSE AND EFFECT OF HILLARY’S CONTINUING EMAIL SCANDAL
FBI Director James Comey sent an open email to legislators this week indicating that the FBI had found new evidence on Huma Abedin’s (Hillary’s close aide) personal laptop and that they were reopening the investigation into Hillary’s use of an unsecured private server with sensitive State Department emails. Comey did not elaborate about the evidence so there are many rumors flying about what might be found this time. I don’t have time to cover all the rumors, but I will say I don’t expect the FBI to reveal anything further until after the election—and then only selectively, omitting the worst offenses. Also, there are plenty of dissatisfied FBI agents and NY Police investigators involved in this big case that may leak the rest. It is looking like there is more than the misuse of classified emails at stake here. Since Huma Abedin was Hillary’s top aide, her email stash is rumored to contain a treasure trove of “pay to play” comments for donors to the Clinton Foundation as well as details of collusion between the Clinton campaign and Hillary to hide illegal activities. This week I’ll discuss FBI director Comey’s motives behind the politically sensitive reopening of the investigation plus the bogus claim by Steve Pieczenik that a silent, bloodless coup has taken over the US government to block the election of Hillary Clinton. . . . .

BOGUS CLAIMS OF AN INTERNET COUP TO SAVE THE REPUBLIC

The entire right wing of the internet is ablaze with the claims of Steve Pieczenik that he and others in the intelligence community have staged a silent, bloodless coup against the government in order to stop the highly corrupt Hillary Clinton from becoming president. Here’s the link to his video.

I’ve always been suspicious of Pieczenik ever since he started appearing on the Alex Jones show. He simply claims too much. He claims to be an insider within the deepest regions of government military operations, and yet on the side of Alex Jones and those who believe in the globalist conspiracy. You can be a former insider and come to a belief in the conspiracy (maybe) but you can’t be both at the same time—unless you are a disinformation agent and someone who makes things up. His latest claims seem to prove the latter.

His official bio says he is an MD and a PhD psychologist who has worked for the government as a hostage negotiator. He has apparently inflated his resume to the Alex Jones team who attribute too-good-to-be-true mythic status to Pieczenik that can’t be true—like his claim to have started the secretive Delta Force, even though the formal story says that Colonels Charlie Beckwith and Thomas Henry started it in the mid 1970's. His latest claim of a secret coup is pure fabrication in my opinion. I don’t agree with a single part of it:

1.a) He claims that on Nov. 1 the Clintons and their entourage affected a civilian coup against the government. Nonsense. The Clintons get away with what they do because they are protected insider-puppets. They don’t run the government and don’t have any power except what the insiders (the dark side of law enforcement and their killers) provide them.

1.b) He says this is done through two methods: corruption and co-opting, implying that they have corrupted (bought off) and co-opted high government officials in order to get away with what they do. He claims they have been co-opting the “White House, Judiciary, CIA, the FBI and our Attorney General” for some time now to make sure that they were “part and parcel of the group of people connected through political cronyism.”

This is total BS and shows that Pieczenik either hasn’t got a clue about how the government is controlled or he’s inventing something plausible to cover for what he really knows. I actually suspect the former. I’ve never agreed with any of his claims in his Alex Jones interviews.
                        
2.a) The Claimed Counter-coup. “Those of us in the intelligence community have informally gotten together and, with their permission, I’m beginning to announce that we’ve initiated a counter-coup, through Julian Assange and Wikileaks.” Later in the video he claims that “we gave him” the stolen emails in order to affect this coup.

An internet coup through information leaked to a person in exile in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London? Only a fool would believe such a weak claim. If Pieczenik was really part of current US intelligence, he would know that the NSA has every email in the country, including Hillary’s. So if they gave incriminating evidence to Assange, why didn’t they give him the much more damaging emails from Hillary? Why use Julian Assange, who only has the Podesta emails?

2.b) He is claiming they have told “the administration” (whoever that is), “we have your number” and “we’re going to stop you from making Hillary the president of the US.” And at the same time “we will convict and indict the President of the US, Loretta Lynch, and many others who are involved in the cover-up of the massive corruption that occurred under the Clinton Foundation.”

Wow, that’s a whopper of a claim! He doesn’t address the fact that the conspiracy controls the DOJ and the courts so how are you going to get a controlled judiciary to prosecute?

2.c) He claims “Their coup was silent, and our coup was silent” (inferring it has already occurred) and “happened on the internet.” Then he claims that the Clinton coup occurred through the internet and the counter coup occurred through the internet”

What planet does he live on? You can’t take down the powerful dark side of government just by leaking the mild type of emails Wikileaks has done so far. Even real blockbuster emails might not do it. Remember, the American public is powerless to prosecute. They have to rely on controlled entities in government to do so, and that’s not going to happen. This guy has just made a fool of all the AJ listeners—who have responded with euphoric comments like “God is giving us back our country.” They really believe this brand of wishful thinking. Wake up, people!

2.d) He feigns humility by claiming he is just a small part of a movement including agents in the FBI, CIA, the Director of National Intelligence, military intelligence, and men and women of “15 other intelligence organizations.” How’s that for name dropping, without names?

The mention of the DNI being part of their group of patriots is proof Pieczenik doesn’t have a clue. The DNI is none other than James R. Clapper, who lied to Congress about NSA spying. Clapper is a dark side operator if there ever was one, and not on our side.

3) The Second American Revolution. He claims his team has started a Second American Revolution, but he is quick to add (in order to avoid legal prosecution for “threatening”), “We do not have guns, we do not have weapons,... we do not intend to kill anybody, we do not intend to harm anybody. But those of us who are veterans in the intelligence service will stop the Clintons.” We will ensure that Obama leaves without any pardon (of Clinton).

Anyone who claims you can overturn the dark side of government with all its powerful groups of well-armed hit men and control of all federal enforcement agencies, plus the courts—with a simple threat of exposure from a few hundred emails is either a naive fool or a disinformation expert playing up to the movement’s fervor against Hillary Clinton. It can’t be done.

To summarize, this entire claim is bogus. This is not a coup by Clintons we are fighting against. What’s happening in America has been going on well before the Clintons. The Clintons don't control Lynch or Comey. All of these key government players are controlled by globalists, who are protecting Obama and the Clintons for being good puppet leaders. Each of the key players in government has his own dark history that allows the conspiracy to use them, or blackmail them.

In conjunction with this phony coup claim, other people are saying that all Clinton’s supporters in high places have cancelled all appearances with her, which is untrue. They also say that Julian Assange has disappeared and may be dead, which is also untrue, as Fortune.com points out:

Assange gave an interview to Russia’s state-run television and says his group did not get emails related to Hillary Clinton’s campaign from a “state actor.”

U.S. intelligence has publicly blamed Russia for the hacked emails from campaign chairman John Podesta. In a statement Thursday, Assange said Wikileaks’ sources of the emails “are not state parties.” It does not say how it obtained the documents, noting only that the original sources are Podesta “and his correspondents.”

-So much for the continual disinformation on the mainstream media and the Clinton campaign that Russia is interfering with the election. Finally, I think there are two possibilities for what we will see of Pieczenik in the future:

1. If Hillary wins: One would hope that Pieczenik is deservedly discredited and his disinformation claims go away. However, that isn’t likely, anymore than Hal Turner went away after being exposed as an FBI plant within the movement (he’s back with Superstation 95). In order to avoid being totally discredited, Pieczenik will come up with yet another story to explain why the coup failed to do what he claimed, or why the effect is delayed. He might also claim that she’ll be impeached or prosecuted soon, leading everyone into believing the election results will soon be overturned. I’m hoping Alex Jones won’t continue to buy into this fraud.

2. If Hillary loses. In this case, Pieczenik will appear to have been right. He’ll be praised as a hero, and will be able to lead the movement astray many more times with his disinformation. If the PTB decide to dump Hillary, it’s not because of some silent coup of internet information that Pieczenik is claiming. It may be because of her health as well as her corruption baggage, but they won’t do it unless they feel like they can control Trump, so we still lose.

The bottom line is that there is no way that Hillary is going to lose unless the establishment decides to let her lose. They have the power to rig the election, and probably have enough votes from benefit-corrupted voters and liberals to win without rigging. But they have rigged the computers to make sure. I’m betting they are still going with Hillary, rather than deal with an unpredictable Trump.

U.S. intel warning of possible al Qaeda attacks in U.S. Monday

SOURCES  :  U.S.  INTEL   WARNING  OF  POSSIBLE  'AL  QAEDA'  ATTACKS  IN  U.S.  MONDAY
 

And  WHO  in  the  US  funds  and  directs  these  jihadis  groups?  Do  you  find  it  interesting  on  the  timing  of  their  activating  them - right  before  the  fraudulent  'elections'?  And  what  else  are  they  planning  to  do  in  the  other  direction  while  we  are  looking  at  the  direction  they  are  pointing  us  to?


Last Updated Nov 4, 2016 6:14 PM EDT

 

NEW YORK -- CBS News has learned about a potential terror threat for the day before the election.

Sources told CBS News senior investigative producer Pat Milton that U.S. intelligence has alerted joint terrorism task forces that Al Qaeda could be planning attacks in three states for Monday.

It is believed New York, Texas and Virginia are all possible targets, though no specific locations are mentioned. A U.S. law enforcement source briefed on the threat information told CBS News’ Milton that the threat is possibly legitimate and concerning. The source said the threat may be aspirational and hence the lack of specificity. 

The source said there has been pressure on Al Qaeda and its affiliates AQAP and AQIS (Al Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent) to regain relevance with its mission. 

U.S. authorities are taking the threat seriously, though the sources stress the intelligence is still being assessed and its credibility hasn’t been confirmed. Counter terrorism officials were alerted to the threat out of abundance of caution.

“While we do not comment on intelligence matters, we will say the counter terrorism and homeland security communities remain vigilant and well-postured to defend against attacks here in the United States,” a U.S. intelligence official told CBS News. 

“The FBI and DHS, working with our federal, state and local counterparts, share and assess intelligence on a daily basis and will continue to work closely with law enforcement and intelligence community partners to identify and disrupt any potential threat to public safety.

“As we have long said, in this environment, home grown violent extremists could strike with little or no notice. 

Our concern that violent extremists could be inspired to conduct attacks inside the U.S. have not diminished.

“The public should expect to continue to observe an increased law enforcement and security presence across communities in public places. Our law enforcement community also continues to take action against those who attempt to engage in activities that could put Americans at risk. 

There are more than 100 Joint Terrorism Task Forces at work across the country in partnership with state and local law enforcement to prevent attacks in the homeland.”

The New York Police Department said it was working with intelligence agencies and the Joint Terrorism Task Force, according to the Reuters news agency.

Intelligence about potential threats always increases during holiday seasons and when big events are approaching.

As Election Day nears, federal law enforcement is planning for several worst-case scenarios.

Earlier this week, an alert warned local police of “polling places” being seen as “attractive targets” for “lone wolf” type attacks by individuals motivated by *violent 'extremist ideologies', 'sovereign citizen' or other 'extremist' activity.  (*Did you note those categories?  WHOM do you suppose they could be referring to?  muslims?  Or Americans?  So you believe we have our Republic restored, and common sense versus the former communist/ marxist idealogies in place?)

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sources-us-intel-warning-of-possible-al-qaeda-attacks-in-us-monday/

Terrorism in the U.S.
 

Paris Agreement - Status of Ratification

Paris Agreement - Status of Ratification
http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9444.php
97 97 Parties have ratified of 197 Parties to the Convention On 5 October 2016, the threshold for entry into force of the Paris Agreement was achieved. The Paris Agreement entered into force on 4 November 2016. The first session of the Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement (CMA1) will take place in Marrakech in conjunction with COP 22 and CMP 12. More information available soon. The Paris Agreement  entered into force on 4 November 2016, thirty days after the date on which at least 55 Parties to the Convention accounting in total for at least an estimated 55 % of the total global greenhouse gas emissions have deposited their instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession with the Depositary. The list below contains the latest information concerning dates of signature and receipt of instruments of ratification by the Secretary-General of the United Nations, as Depositary of the Kyoto Protocol. The dates in the third column are those of the receipt of the instrument of ratification, acceptance (A) or approval (AA). Authoritative information on the status of the Paris Agreement, including information on signatories to the Agreement, ratification and entry into force, is provided by the Depositary, through the United Nations Treaty Collection website, which can be accessed here, and the Depositary Notifications which are available here. Background information related to the ratification, acceptance, approval or accession of the Paris Agremeent, as well as its entry into force can be found here.
Paris Agreement
Paris, 12 December 2015
Entry into force: 4 November 2016 Status: Signatories: 193. Parties: 97 Note: The Paris Agreement was adopted on 12 December 2015 at the twenty-first session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015. In accordance with its article 20, the Agreement shall be open for signature at the United Nations Headquarters in New York from 22 April 2016 until 21 April 2017 by States and regional economic integration organizations that are Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Participant Signature Ratification Acceptance (A) Approval (AA) AFGHANISTAN 22 Apr 2016 ALBANIA 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 ALGERIA 22 Apr 2016 20 Oct 2016 ANDORRA 22 Apr 2016 ANGOLA 22 Apr 2016 ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 ARGENTINA 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 ARMENIA 20 Sep 2016 AUSTRALIA 22 Apr 2016 AUSTRIA 22 Apr 2016 5 Oct 2016 AZERBAIJAN 22 Apr 2016 BAHAMAS 22 Apr 2016 22 Aug 2016 BAHRAIN 22 Apr 2016 BANGLADESH 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 BARBADOS 22 Apr 2016 22 Apr 2016 BELARUS 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 A BELGIUM* 22 Apr 2016 BELIZE 22 Apr 2016 22 Apr 2016 BENIN 22 Apr 2016 31 Oct 2016 BHUTAN 22 Apr 2016 BOLIVIA (PLURINATIONAL  STATE OF) 22 Apr 2016 5 Oct 2016 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 22 Apr 2016 BOTSWANA 22 Apr 2016 BRAZIL 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 BRUNEI DARUSSALAM 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 BULGARIA 22 Apr 2016 BURKINA FASO 22 Apr 2016 BURUNDI 22 Apr 2016 CABO VERDE 22 Apr 2016 CAMBODIA 22 Apr 2016 CAMEROON 22 Apr 2016 29 Jul 2016 CANADA 22 Apr 2016 5 Oct 2016 CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC 22 Apr 2016 11 Oct 2016 CHAD 22 Apr 2016 CHILE 20 Sep 2016 CHINA* 22 Apr 2016 3 Sep 2016 COLOMBIA 22 Apr 2016 COMOROS 22 Apr 2016 CONGO 22 Apr 2016 COOK ISLANDS* 24 Jun 2016 1 Sep 2016 COSTA RICA 22 Apr 2016 13 Oct 2016 COTE D'IVOIRE 22 Apr 2016 25 Oct 2016 CROATIA 22 Apr 2016 CUBA 22 Apr 2016 CYPRUS 22 Apr 2016 CZECH REPUBLIC 22 Apr 2016 DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA 22 Apr 2016 1 Aug 2016 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO 22 Apr 2016 DENMARK (1) 22 Apr 2016 1 Nov 2016 (A) DJIBOUTI 22 Apr 2016 DOMINICA 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 22 Apr 2016 ECUADOR 26 July 2016 EGYPT 22 Apr 2016 EL SALVADOR 22 Apr 2016 EQUATORIAL GUINEA 22 Apr 2016 ERITREA 22 Apr 2016 ESTONIA 22 Apr 2016 ETHIOPIA 22 Apr 2016 EUROPEAN UNION* 22 Apr 2016 5 Oct 2016 FIJI 22 Apr 2016 22 Apr 2016 FINLAND 22 Apr 2016 FRANCE 22 Apr 2016 5 Oct 2016 GABON 22 Apr 2016 2 Nov 2016 GAMBIA 26 Apr 2016 GEORGIA 22 Apr 2016 GERMANY 22 Apr 2016 5 Oct 2016 GHANA 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 GREECE 22 Apr 2016 14 Oct 2016 GRENADA 22 Apr 2016 22 Apr 2016 GUATEMALA 22 Apr 2016 GUINEA 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 GUINEA-BISSAU 22 Apr 2016 GUYANA 22 Apr 2016 20 May 2016 HAITI 22 Apr 2016 HONDURAS 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 HUNGARY 22 Apr 2016 5 Oct 2016 ICELAND 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 A INDIA* 22 Apr 2016 2 Oct 2016 INDONESIA 22 Apr 2016 31 Oct 2016 IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF) 22 Apr 2016 IRELAND 22 Apr 2016 ISRAEL 22 Apr 2016 ITALY 22 Apr 2016 JAMAICA 22 Apr 2016 JAPAN 22 Apr 2016 JORDAN 22 Apr 2016 KAZAKHASTAN 2 Aug 2016 KENYA 22 Apr 2016 KIRIBATI 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 KUWAIT 22 Apr 2016 KYRGYZSTAN 21 Sep 2016 LAO PEOPLE'S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC 22 Apr 2016 7 Sep 2016 LATVIA 22 Apr 2016 LEBANON 22 Apr 2016 LESOTHO 22 Apr 2016 LIBERIA 22 Apr 2016 LIBYA 22 Apr 2016 LIECHTENSTEIN 22 Apr 2016 LITHUANIA 22 Apr 2016 LUXEMBOURG 22 Apr 2016 MADAGASCAR 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 MALAWI 20 Sep 2016 MALAYSIA 22 Apr 2016 MALDIVES 22 Apr 2016 22 Apr 2016 MALI 22 Apr 2016 23 Sep 2016 MALTA 22 Apr 2016 5 Oct 2016 MARSHALL ISLANDS* 22 Apr 2016 22 Apr 2016 MAURITANIA 22 Apr 2016 MAURITIUS 22 Apr 2016 22 Apr 2016 MEXICO* 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 MICRONESIA* (FEDERATED STATES OF) 22 Apr 2016 15 Sep 2016 MONACO 22 Apr 2016 24 Oct 2016 MONGOLIA 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 MONTENEGRO 22 Apr 2016 MOROCCO 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 MOZAMBIQUE 22 Apr 2016 MYANMAR 22 Apr 2016 NAMIBIA 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 NAURU* 22 Apr 2016 22 Apr 2016 NEPAL 22 Apr 2016 5 Oct 2016 NETHERLANDS 22 Apr 2016 NEW ZEALAND (2) 22 Apr 2016 4 Oct 2016 NIGER 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 NIGERIA 22 Sep 2016 NIUE* 28 Oct 2016 28 Oct 2016 NORWAY 22 Apr 2016 20 June 2016 OMAN 22 Apr 2016 PAKISTAN 22 Apr 2016 PALAU 22 Apr 2016 22 April 2016 PANAMA 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 PAPUA NEW GUINEA 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 PARAGUAY 22 Apr 2016 14 Oct 2016 PERU 22 Apr 2016 25 Jul 2016 PHILIPPINES 22 Apr 2016 POLAND* 22 Apr 2016 7 Oct 2016 PORTUGAL 22 Apr 2016 5 Oct 2016 QATAR 22 Apr 2016 REPUBLIC OF KOREA 22 Apr 2016 3 Nov 2016 REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA 21 Sep 2016 ROMANIA 22 Apr 2016 RUSSIAN FEDERATION 22 Apr 2016 RWANDA 22 Apr 2016 6 Oct 2016 SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS 22 Apr 2016 22 April 2016 SAINT LUCIA 22 Apr 2016 22 April 2016 SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES 22 Apr 2016 29 Jun 2016 SAMOA 22 Apr 2016 22 Apr 2016 SAN MARINO 22 Apr 2016 SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE 22 Apr 2016 2 Nov 2016 SAUDI ARABIA  3 Nov 2016  3 Nov 2016   SENEGAL 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 SERBIA 22 Apr 2016 SEYCHELLES 25 Apr 2016 29 Apr 2016 SIERRA LEONE 22 Sep 2016 1 Nov 2016 SINGAPORE 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 SLOVAKIA 22 Apr 2016 5 Oct 2016 SLOVENIA 22 Apr 2016 SOLOMON ISLANDS* 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 SOMALIA 22 Apr 2016 22 Apr 2016 SOUTH AFRICA 22 Apr 2016 1 Nov 2016 SOUTH SUDAN 22 Apr 2016 SPAIN 22 Apr 2016 SRI LANKA 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 STATE OF PALESTINE 22 Apr 2016 22 Apr 2016 SUDAN 22 Apr 2016 SURINAME 22 Apr 2016 SWAZILAND 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 SWEDEN 22 Apr 2016 13 Oct 2016 SWITZERLAND 22 Apr 2016 TAJIKISTAN 22 Apr 2016 THAILAND 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA 22 Apr 2016 TIMOR-LESTE 22 Apr 2016 TOGO 19 Sep 2016 TONGA 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO 22 Apr 2016 TUNISIA 22 Apr 2016 TURKEY 22 Apr 2016 TURKMENISTAN 23 Sep 2016 21 Oct 2016 TUVALU* 22 Apr 2016 22 April 2016 UGANDA 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 UKRAINE 22 Apr 2016 19 Sep 2016 UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 A UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND 22 Apr 2016 UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA 22 Apr 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 22 Apr 2016 3 Sep 2016 A URUGUAY 22 Apr 2016 19 Oct 2016 VANUATU* 22 Apr 2016 21 Sep 2016 VENEZUELA (BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF) 22 Apr 2016 VIET NAM 22 Apr 2016 3 Nov 2016 AA YEMEN 23 Sep 2016 ZAMBIA 20 Sep 2016 ZIMBABWE 22 Apr 2016 (1) With territorial exclusion in respect of Greenland. See C.N.819.2016.TREATIES-XXVII.7.d of 1 November 2016. (2) With a territorial exclusion. See C.N.723.2016.TREATIES-XXVII.7.d of 4 October 2016.6. *Declarations (Unless otherwise indicated, the declarations were made upon ratification, acceptance, approval or accession.) Belgium Declaration made upon signature: “This signature engages also the Walloon Region, the Flemish Region and the Brussels-Capital Region.” China Declaration: In accordance with the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China and the Basic Law of the Macao Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China, the Government of the People’s Republic of China decides that the Agreement applies to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and the Macao Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. Cook Islands Declaration: The Government of the Cook Islands declares its understanding that acceptance of the Paris Agreement and its application shall in no way constitute a renunciation of any rights under international law concerning State responsibility for the adverse effects of climate change and that no provision in the Paris Agreement can be interpreted as derogating from principles of general international law or any claims or rights concerning compensation due to the impacts of climate change. The Government of the Cook Islands further declares that, in light of the best available scientific information and assessment on climate change and its impacts, it considers the emissions reduction obligations in the aforesaid Paris Agreement to be inadequate to prevent a global temperature stabilisation level at or above 1.5 degrees Celsius relative to pre-industrial levels and as a consequence, such emissions will have severe implications for our national interests. European Union Declaration: “Declaration by the Union made in accordance with Article 20(3) of the Paris Agreement The following States are at present Members of the European Union: the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Republic of Croatia, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The European Union declares that, in accordance with the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 191 and Article 192(1) thereof, it is competent to enter into international agreements, and to implement the obligations resulting therefrom, which contribute to the pursuit of the following objectives: - preserving, protecting and improving the quality of the environment; - protecting human health; - prudent and rational utilisation of natural resources; - promoting measures at international level to deal with regional or worldwide environmental problems, and in particular combating climate change. … The European Union will continue to provide information, on a regular basis on any substantial modifications in the extent of its competence, in accordance with Article 20(3) of the Agreement.” India Declaration: “The Government of India declares its understanding that, as per its national laws; keeping in view its development agenda, particularly the eradication of poverty and provision of basic needs for all its citizens, coupled with its commitment to following the low carbon path to progress, and on the assumption of unencumbered availability of cleaner sources of energy and technologies and financial resources from around the world; and based on a fair and ambitious assessment of global commitment to combating climate change, it is ratifying the Paris Agreement.” Marshall Islands Declaration: “…the Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands declares its understanding that ratification of the Paris Agreement shall in no way constitute a renunciation of any rights under any other laws, including international law, and the communication depositing the Republic's instrument of ratification shall include a declaration to this effect for international record; FURTHERMORE, the Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands declares that, in light of best scientific information and assessment on climate change and its impacts, it considers the emission reduction obligations in Article 3 of the Kyoto Protocol, the Doha Amendment and the aforesaid Paris Agreement to be inadequate to prevent global temperature increase of 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-Industrial levels and as a consequence, will have severe implications for our national interests…” Mexico Interpretative declaration: … in accordance with their national legal framework, and in consideration of the best and most up-to-date scientific information available and incorporated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the United Mexican States understands greenhouse gas emissions to mean the release into the atmosphere of greenhouse gases and/or their precursors and aerosols into the atmosphere, including, where applicable, greenhouse compounds, within a specific area and during a specific period of time. Micronesia (Federated States of) Declaration: “The Government of the Federated States of Micronesia declares its understanding that its ratification of the Paris Agreement does not constitute a renunciation of any rights of the Government of the Federated States of Micronesia under international law concerning State responsibility for the adverse effects of climate change, and that no provision in the Paris Agreement can be interpreted as derogating from principles of general international law or any claims or rights concerning compensation and liability due to the adverse effects of climate change; and The Government of the Federated States of Micronesia further declares that, in light of the best available scientific information and assessments on climate change and its impacts, it considers the emission reduction obligations in the Paris Agreement to be inadequate to prevent a global temperature increase above 1.5 degrees Celsius relative to pre-industrial levels, and as a consequence, such emissions will have severe implications for the national interests of the Government of the Federated States of Micronesia.” Nauru Declaration: “… the Government, of Nauru declares its understanding that the ratification of the Agreement shall in no way constitute a renunciation of any rights under international law concerning State responsibility [for] the adverse effects of climate change. FURTHER, the Government of Nauru declares that no provisions in the Agreement can be interpreted as derogating from the principles of general international law. AND FURTHER, the Government of Nauru declares its understanding that Article 8 and decision 1/CP.21, paragraph 51 in no way limits the ability of Parties to UNFCCC or the Agreement to raise, discuss, or address any present or future concerns regarding the issues of liability and compensation. The Republic of Nauru put forth its concern intended to recognize and acknowledge its national interest...” Niue Declaration: “The Government of Niue declares its understanding that acceptance of the Paris Agreement and its application shall in no way constitute a renunciation of any rights under international law concerning State responsibility for the adverse effects of climate change and that no provision in the Paris Agreement can be interpreted as derogating from principles of general international law or any claims or rights concerning compensation due to the impacts of climate change. The Government of Niue further declares that, in light of the best available scientific information and assessment on climate change and its impacts, it considers the emissions reduction obligations in the aforesaid Paris Agreement to be inadequate to prevent a global temperature stabilisation level at or above 1.5 degrees Celsius relative to pre-industrial levels and as a consequence, such emissions will have severe implications for our national interests.” Poland Declaration made upon signature: “The Government of the Republic of Poland recognizes that under Article 9 paragraph 1 of the Paris Agreement developed country Parties shall provide financial resources to assist developing country Parties with respect to both mitigation and adaptation in continuation of their existing obligations under the Convention. In this context the Government of the Republic of Poland notes that Poland is a Party to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change not included in Annex II.” Solomon Islands Declaration: “… the Government of Solomon Islands declares its understanding that acceptance of the aforesaid Paris Agreement shall in no way constitute a renunciation of any rights under international law concerning State responsibility for the adverse effects of climate change; FURTHER, that the Government of Solomon Islands declares that no provision in this Paris Agreement can be interpreted as derogating from principles of general international law or any claims or rights concerning compensation due to impacts of climate change; AND that the Government of Solomon Islands declares that the low ambition of the Paris Agreement and its adequacy to stabilize global temperature to safe level of below 1.5 degree Celsius, such emissions will have severe impacts and undermining our sustainable development efforts…” Tuvalu Declaration: “The Government of Tuvalu hereby notifies that it will apply the Paris Agreement provisionally as provided for in paragraph 4 of Decision 1/CP.21. […] The Government of Tuvalu further declares its understanding that acceptance of the aforesaid Paris Agreement and its provisional application shall in no way constitute a renunciation of any rights under international law concerning State responsibility for the adverse effects of climate change and that no provision in the Paris Agreement can be interpreted as derogating from principles of general international law or any claims or rights concerning compensation due to the impacts of climate change. The Government of Tuvalu further declares that, in light of the best available scientific information and assessment on climate change and its impacts, it considers the emissions reduction obligations in the aforesaid Paris Agreement to be inadequate to prevent a global temperature stabilisation level at or above 1.5 degrees Celsius relative to pre-industrial levels and as a consequence, such emissions will have severe implications for our national interests.” Vanuatu Declaration: “WHEREAS the Government of the Republic of Vanuatu declares its understanding that ratification of the Paris Agreement shall in no way constitute a renunciation of any rights under any other laws, including international law, and the communication depositing the Republic’s instrument of ratification shall include a declaration to this effect for international record; FURTHERMORE, that the Government of the Republic of Vanuatu declares that, in light of best scientific information and assessment on climate change and its impacts, it considers the emission reduction obligations in Article 3 of the Kyoto Protocol, the Doha Amendment and the aforesaid Paris Agreement to be inadequate to prevent global temperature increase of 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-Industrial levels and as a consequence, will have severe implications for our national interests...”