Official Declaration
of
Contempt of Constitution
by
The People of the United States of America
With this Document, Filed, Presented or Posted with any
agency, department, representative or body politic of government in any
form which such government shall take, shall be construed by force
majeure as the same shall be duly gathered by We THE People, and the
same shall at any time be required or necessary, to be an official and
undeniable Declaration of CONTEMPT OF CONSTITUTION for the People of the
United States of America, and sets forth the following information and
Declaration in support thereof.
The inherent authority and power to charge one with
contempt of court has long been recognized within the courts and the
legal structure of the governments of the United States of America. It
has been well understood, and is accepted, that such authority and power
belongs to common law courts as a result of the nature of what contempt
of court is, an inherent authority and power being undeniable and
un-separable to the courts because of the nature of what that authority
and power is. It is further recognized by We THE People, as claimed by
the courts themselves, that contempt of court is the highest authority
and power as being true and correct on its face accordingly.
Likewise, it is recognized that such authority and power
arose first from an acknowledgement and allowance of the King of England
in the early Eighteenth century, or early 1700’s, as revealed by the
U.S. Supreme Court case of In Re Green v. U.S., N.Y., 78 S. Ct. 632,
356 U.S. 165, 2L. Ed. 2d 672. This revelation being thus shown to
illustrate the fact that the power of contempt of court itself actually
comes under the sovereignty of a country just as it did in England at
that time centuries ago, proves to the People and establishes by like
principle that the power of contempt of court in the United States also
belongs under the ultimate Sovereignty of the United States of America
the republic thereof, or the People, as was expressly embodied in the
Preamble as “We the People.”
Proclaiming and explaining the inherent right of the
courts themselves to simply declare the right to contempt of court, it
is stated at Corpus Juris Secundun, Volume 17, Section 43, Page 108 that
“In order that any human agency may accomplish its purpose, it is
necessary that it possess power." The executive must have power to
direct or control his business. The Superintendent must have power to
direct his men. In order to accomplish the purposes for which they were
created, courts must also possess powers. … these powers are called
inherent powers. Among these powers is the power to punish for
contempt.”
We THE People of the United States of America, having come
together in peaceful assembly to return to Original Jurisdiction and
Venue and return the formation of a republic, being noted in the
Preamble as “We the People,” likewise have, and hereby reveal and
prescribe, an Inherent Authority and Power, and for the same or similar
reasons, in their own fashion, do so reason and Declare:
In order that any human body of people forming a
constitution representing them directly by prescribed or written agency
may accomplish their purposes, in order to keep their constitution
secure, safe and sound in its integrity, clean, pure, inviolable (not
being violated), it is necessary that that body of people possess all
inherent authority and power. The business owner must have authority and
power to direct or control his business or punish or fire bad employees
who refuse to be directed or controlled as required. The Superintendent
must have authority and power to direct his men. In order to accomplish
the purpose for which they created a Constitution, a People organized
in a republic, or even recognized between themselves as bearing or
having a constitution, whether or not written, must also possess
Authority and Powers. …these authorities and powers are called Inherent
Authorities and Powers. These Authorities and Powers are undeniable,
irrevocable, irreversible, indisputable, and unalienable, by any
elements of government. Among these authorities and powers is the
authority and power to punish for Contempt of Constitution. Contempt of
Constitution belongs and is inherent to We THE People alone. No part of
authority or power of government may attach it, detract from it, taint
it, or approach it.
Furthermore, not only does the Inherent Authority and
Power of Contempt of Constitution belong to the People alone, wherefore
no body of government may approach it without committing Contempt of
Constitution at its highest level, but the principle of Contempt of
Constitution was embodied by the Constitution’s Founding Fathers or
Framers, at Article I, Section 6, Clause 1, perceived and understood
therein as “breach of Peace” being understood so to be, to wit:
Treason and Felony are referred to in Article I, Section
6, Clause 1, but Misdemeanor is not. Thus, mere Misdemeanors, even if
seemingly causing a breach of peace by today’s standards, would not be
sufficient to prevent a Congressman or Senator from attending Congress
in session. Reviewing all forms of Misdemeanors and recognizing that
none of them apply to such a breach as described in the Constitution, by
process of elimination, the only kind of breach that could be so
serious as to be thought by the Founding Fathers as being worthy to stop
an attendance of Congress in session was that kind of an offense
serious enough to be regarded as equal or greater than the commitment of
either a treason of felony.
Whenever any person of We THE People, or the People as a
Whole, shall have their rights subsequent to mandated rights and
requirements usurped by government, and shall further have as to such
abuse, contempt, or usurpation by government their:
Rights that any person or People not be assaulted in their fundamental
or constitutional rights or their rights of due process in connection
with Life, Liberty and Property are abused or denied (5th Amendment);
Rights to be or feel secure in their houses, not just house, as to all
their communications, even with modern technology, the advent of modern
technology not amending the Constitution in any part thereof (4th
Amendment);
Rights to feel secure while traveling abroad by not being forced under
penalty of fine or imprisonment (being in duress, by the conduct of
government agents) or violation of other rights to show or produce their
papers (4th & 5th Amendment);
Rights of speech, religion, assembly, the press, and petition, not
polluted with false concepts of expression leading to gross depravity.
Perversion, and leading to all forms of social self-destruction,
including children murdering children (1st & 9th Amendments);
Rights to exist peacefully in their homes during times of peace (3rd Amendment);
Rights not to have the State’s militia suppressed, oppressed, or done
away with under pretense or disguise of being a national guard, or
military assaults committed against private homes for constitutionally
violation purposes (Article I, Section 8, Clause 16 & 2nd, 8th and
10th Amendments);
Rights of justice by an impartial jury, under control (trial, try – to
control) of a Jury, not under control of a judge, thus representing the
People directly (Article III, Section 2, Clause 3 and the 6th
Amendment);
Rights to not have judges wearing the (black) robes of England or any
other country, to not be required to “all rise” for, to not be required
to speak, say or lavish the title of honor where no constitutional law
can be required of the People to do so, and to have government of the
United States and of the several States to not support, either by law or
by practice, a title of such as, but not limited to “esquire,” or any
association or organization, foreign or domestic, in support thereof
(Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 and Article I, Section 10, Clause 1);
Rights to be fully informed of all material facts that transpire in the
courts, not to have judges or attorneys take “silent judicial notice” of
elements of proceedings thereby impairing the obligation of contract
with the court (Article I, Section 10, Clause 6);
Rights to have the separation of powers between the several States and
the United States in cases of criminal offense alleged and recognized
(Article III, Section 2, Clause 3);
Rights to have all commerce not crossing or else no longer crossing a
State’s borders recognized as intrastate commerce, not interstate
commerce, and therefore not under the power and authority of the United
States government (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3);
Rights to not have Congress have the right to regulate (make regular or
uniform) commerce among the States (or interstate commerce) to be
extended to mean “to regulate or control interstate society” where such
wording is not plainly stated (not being found in Article I, Section 8,
Clause 3);
Rights to assistance of counsel (not necessarily attorney or lawyers),
assistance not being forced, controlled or limited by any organization
what-so-ever (6th Amendment);
Rights against governmental and other encroachments to have civil
matters in cases of determined value tried by jury, also not under the
control of a lawyer judge (7th Amendment);
Rights of reasonable bail set, but not by prosecution and trial, and no cruel and unusual punishment (8th Amendment);
Rights to not be forced to use an unlawfull form of money, consideration
or value received on export (or income from an accounting standpoint)
be taxable by the United States Corporation or Government, weather
alleged to be to any foreign country or to any local county or State or
nation, or no tax on the export side of interstate commerce in any form
(Article I, Section 9, Clause 5);
Rights to the Inherent Right to have the language of the People, in all
aspects to which it applies to them, belong to the People alone and
under their control, and to not belong to or be controlled by any form
of government thereof to any degree whatsoever, and rights to the common
law thereunder (9th, 5th and 7th Amendments);
Rights to have all rights, through not specifically numbered
(enumerated) within the Constitution but retained without Article V
required amendment, retained by the First Generation, or that generation
which came under the wording “retained by the people” (9th Amendment);
Rights to have certain powers considered forever and distinctly separate
between bodies of government, United States, States, and People (10th
Amendment);
Rights to bear arms in order to secure against the loss of the condition
of a free state, whether by overt or covert means, being the loss of
right to Life, Liberty and Property without due process of the law (2nd
Amendment combined with the 5th Amendment);
Rights of all other things as they exist within the main body of the
Constitution itself as well as other parts of the Constitution not
named;
Then they, the People, are NOT at peace by any of these
breaches, either as individuals, or as a People, and Peace clearly has
been breached thereby. Article I, Section 6, Clause 1- the minimal
embodiment of Contempt of Constitution.
THEREFORE, by these unalienable and mutual understandings
beheld now by We THE People, whether or not previously spoken, written,
or declared by any knowledge of fact or law, and by mutual covenants of
the People, by the People, and between the People unspoken and unwritten
yet existent, thus giving their heart-felt, undeniable, and solemn
consent to this proceeding, without regard to any expressed numeration
of the People so represented hereby but being all inclusive for all of
the People United, the People of the United States of America and of the
Several States do file and Declare CONTEMPT OF CONSTITUTION to belong
as an inherent Power to them, the People, alone, AND THAT by each and
every filing and declaration of this Inherent Power throughout the land,
this Unalienable Power of Contempt of Constitution shall, for the
People alone, GROW EXPOENTIALLY accordingly.
THAT because Contempt by its own nature is a Quasi-Crime,
or has many different appearances and aspects, and not a civil offense,
and because there are different classes of Contempt, re: Corpus Juris
Secundum, Volume 17, Section 43, Page 115, it is necessary to set forth
what appears to be the different classes of Contempt of Constitution
herein.
Definitions
The definition(s) of Contempt of Constitution is as
follows: Contempt of Constitution is a Sovereign Crime, committed
against the sovereign person(s) = People whom such Constitution
represents. For the purposes of defining Contempt of Constitution as
applicable to the Constitution for the United States of America, the
classification of and degrees of types of Contempt of Constitution and
like crimes shall be, and hereby are:
General Contempt. Where Contempt has been committed or asserted, but may
have been done ignorantly or unknowingly. (Not a defense) This shall
include Attempted Contempt.
Malicious Contempt. Where General Contempt has been repeated, so that
ignorance of the law is clearly no excuse, or contempt deliberately
committed with afore knowledge, or where the results of the contempt is
severe against one or more of the person(s) = People victimized by it so
that a distinct harm has befallen or inevitably will befall such
person(s) = People.
Tyrannical Malicious Contempt. Contempt so strong that it is apparent
that the author(s) of tyranny work(s) act of Malicious Contempt, on a
similar or dissimilar basis, in an effort, no matter how small, to gain a
destructive power over any person=People within the United States of
America or any of its territories, or where a corrupt use, or corrupt
taking-part in such use, of power, whether or not, by any manner
delegated, whereby such power may be used maliciously toward any citizen
or any person=People under the protection of the Constitution and Bill
of Rights of the United States of America.
Noble Contempt. Noble Contempt of Constitution occurs when a person or
business is recognized and=or treated differently, either greater or
lesser, under any operation of law (even though a special fee {which
shall be unlawfull} might have been paid to a government for such
special recognition) that is recognized for other common or ordinary
People, as well as for businesses. Noble Contempt also exists wherein
private People or businesses are elevated in status above other common
People or businesses by either what they are provided as rights to be
entitled, above other People of equal merit, to do or by where they are
regarded by some sense of fame already in existence as to be given
advantage(s) that other ordinary or common People or businesses under
the same circumstances would not be provided. Noble Contempt shall also
include Noble Contempt by De-nobilization, which is an act of subjecting
an individual or even a specific populous to a condition of degradation
or reduction in status of importance under the law, whether by statute,
code, regulation or common law, in favor of not reducing all People
equally, to be affected thereby. This jurisdictional charge and all
penalties hereunder, shall apply to both People and non-nationals of the
United States of America and of any State. This is an Inherent Power
expressed by the Constitution at Article I, Section 9 Clause 8, and
Article I, Section 10, Clause 1.
Noble Malicious Contempt. Is the establishment of Noble Contempt where
the party or parties involved in such contemptuous activity refuse to
vacate such Contempt and such Contempt can be shown to work a hardship
or deprivation of common rights upon any other United States of America
native born national or native born in a state of the union. This
jurisdictional charge and all penalties hereunder, shall apply to both
native born People and non-nationals of the United States of America and
of any State. This is an Inherent Authority and Power expressed by the
Constitution at article I, Section 9, Clause 8 and Article I, Section
10, Clause 1.
Noble Tyrannical Malicious Contempt. Is the establishment of Noble
Contempt on a harsh and repetitive basis where the party or parties
involved in such contemptuous activity effectuate such Contempt to the
degree that it represents a blatant disregard for basic human rights,
rights embraced by the Constitution, where gross insensitivity toward
the suffering of any United States of America native born Freeman or
Free-Woman is the result, and it is reasonably believed that the party
or parties knew of the unconstitutionality of their acts but proceeded
with obvious Contempt to continue them at any cost, or where there shall
be a corrupt use of power in conjunction with such Noble Tyrannical
Malicious Contempt, whether or not, by any manner, delegated, that may
be used maliciously as toward any native born Freeman or Free-Woman of,
or any person=People under the protection of the United States of
America nor any of its territories. Furthermore, Noble Tyrannical
Malicious Contempt may be recognized as having been committed in any
event where the wanton disregard for the rights, safety and secureness
of the common native born Freeman or free-Woman, whether or not the same
shall be considered sovereign, is enacted, as represented by the
scientific formula written as " ∑(#1) = F∞" (Total Humanity),” putting
all or a great portion of humanity at risk of life and=or liberty for
the benefit of one, which may be representatively defined in analogical
format, put in antiquated-like, but not clearly expressive terms as,
“The Sum of Me is Equal To All of Thee.”
IN THE FURTHERANCE of this DECLARATION of CONTEMPT OF CONSTITUTION,
where there shall be any attempt to refute, deny, or twist the same so
as to be made of alleged non-effect, while holding that the authority
and power of contempt of court exists at all, it is further hereby
NOTED, UNDERSTOOD, and DECLARED THAT if there be at any time any claim
that CONTEMPT OF CONSTITUTION does not exist or that the We THE People
have no right thereto, that contempt of court does not exist or that the
We THE People have no right thereto, then contempt of court does not
exist either, nor contempt of legislature, nor contempt of the
executive; the lower cannot supersede the higher, nor set it aside.
Therefore, any attempt to declare that Contempt of Constitution does not
exist for or belong to We THE People alone in favor of contempt of
court or any other authority or power of government, represents a
Contempt of Constitution to the Tyrannical Malicious Degree, and is
inherently prosecutable there under.
Other forms of Contempt of Constitution may exist as We THE People alone discern or duly proclaim them to be hereafter.
NOTED NOW, and DESCERNED. There is no statute of limitations of Contempt
of Constitution, and there can be none, except it be declared by We THE
People themselves, which they shall not, except it be by Amendment by
Pure Convention, (shall) do.
Contempt of Constitution
Has been formally and officially Declared by this proceeding to the same
extent as contempt of court was first declared many ages ago, and has
the same lawfull intent and purpose as does contempt of court, the
keeping and securing of the Constitution in a safe and sound condition,
maintaining its integrity in its rights established solely for the
benefit of We THE People of the United States of America.
A tribunal representing a lawfull force recognized by and under the
Constitution of the United States of America (Article I, Section 8,
Clause 9), also by the power of the tribunals long known and existing
under common law, by the power of separate and third party existence as
established under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United
States of America, Circa 1778 as amended at 1791, the Tribunal of We THE
People undersigned, representing the People in law and in sovereign
law, whether by direct representation or by those solemn and sovereign
authority and powers in spirit and in fact as embodied and held, being
retained by the First Generation as set forth and required by the Ninth
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, now
hereby below subscribe their appellations, giving force, authority and
power to this proceeding and Declaration, by use by proxy of the
appellations of those Founding Fathers whose historical appellations now
are entered below upon this Extraordinary Writ of Sovereign
Declaration, joined by others thereafter in spirit and=or in fact, this
Declaration of Contempt of Constitution is and has been put into
Perpetual and Sovereign Effect and Power by the Power and Effect of
these Three appellations so autographed, real People=Citizens standing
in Symbolic Proxy for the Same, and is therefore,
{Place your statement of facts and=or your issue by verified Affidavit}
It is Ordered, Sentenced and Decreed by the Lawfull Authority and Power
by the Political Will of We THE People of the United States of America
the date of the Declaration of this Inherent Authority and Power of
Contempt of Constitution being Timeless, extending to all times when the
offense(s) shall have been committed, by
Autograph:
(Seal)
Autograph:
(Seal)
Autograph:
(Seal)
Former law: See sections 1 and 2 of Act 322 of 1919, being CL 1929, §§ 8520 and 8521.
750.352 Molesting and disturbing persons in pursuit of occupation, vocation or avocation.
Sec., 352. Any person or persons who shall, by threats, intimidations, or otherwise, and without authority
(of) law, interfere with, or in any way molest, or attempt to interfere
with, or in any way molest or disturb, without such authority, any
person, in the quiet and peaceable pursuit of his lawful occupation,
vocation or avocation, or on the way to and from such occupation,
vocation or avocation, or who shall aid or abet in any such unlawful
acts, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931; - Am. 1947, Act 297, Eff. Oct. 11, 1947; - CL 1948, 750.352.
Former law: See section 1 of Act 163 of 1867, being CL 1871, § 7690; How., § 9273; CL 1897, § 11343; CL 1915, § 15010; and
1929, § 8612.
750.505 Punishment for indictable common law offenses.
Sec. 505. Any person who shall commit any indictable offense at the common law, for the punishment of
which no provision is expressly made by any statute of this state, shall be guilty of a felony, punishable by
imprisonment in the state prison not more than 5 years or by a fine of
not more than $10,000.00, or both in the discretion of the court.
History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931; - CL 1948, 750.505; - Am. 1954, Act 66, Eff. Aug. 13, 1954.
Former law: See section 15 of Ch. IX of Act 175 of 1927, being CL 1929, § 17343.
Each State should have similar laws on their books.
