Wednesday, January 3, 2018

The Constitution Con (A Sad Tale of Parchment Idolatry) by Michael Tsarion

The first function of the founders of nations, after the founding itself, is to devise a set of true falsehoods about origins - a mythology - that will make it desirable for nationals to continue to live under common authority, and, indeed, make it impossible for them to entertain contrary thoughts - Forrest McDonald (E Pluribus Unum)
The US Constitution was created on September 17, 1787, and ratified behind closed doors on June 21, 1788. Thirty nine of the fifty five delegates attending the Philadelphia Convention signed the document. Their con job is evident from the very first line penned. Legally, the "People" mentioned are not sovereign beings, but willing slaves who have been granted the illusion of freedom.

From an occult point of view the Constitution was ratified on an Atonist festival day. It is, therefore, a patently Solar Cult document. This is because the date of ratification - June 21st - is the day the sun ascends to its highest point in the zodiac.

Washington presided on a low rostrum in the Assembly Hall (where the Declaration of Independence had been approved) from his “rising sun chair.” The top of the chair showed half a sun with two eyes and a nose and thirteen rays like hair. Above it on a stem hung a pyramid-shaped plant. The whole is a Templar image. As the delegates sign the new Constitution, Benjamin Franklin told them that the sun on Washington’s chair was rising, not setting on the new union - Nicholas Hagger (The Secret History of the West)
Benjamin Franklin, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton were three of the men who framed the infernal Constitution and pushed for its ratification. Their document served the American aristocracy, not the people. In fact the document was never put before the people for ratification, and was openly opposed by the majority of men and women in the original thirteen states, who resisted coming together to form any kind of unified nation. Facts of this sort have been deliberately concealed through the decades, but are now openly accepted by some mainstream American historians, such as Joseph Ellis, Thomas DiLorenzo, and others.

The Constitutionalists were guileful traitors whose attendance at the Philadelphia Convention was kept secret for an entire generation. Their document served to leave the "door" of America unlocked and ajar, so the country's foreign enemies could surreptitiously re-enter in the days and years following the supposed War of Independence. 
Benjamin Franklin, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton - architects of monarchy in disguise
The hypocrisy and duplicity of the Federalists is responsible for modern neo-imperialism and advent of the so-called New World Order. In our opinion these men were little more than British agents, because King George himself - who declared eternal war on America - could not have done as much damage to America as their actions wrought.

Such a tyrannical future where property rights would be ignored, where a massive standing army would lurk unchallengeable, where Congressmen would hold office for life, where ruinous treaties would be commonplace, where Presidential powers would make Nero jealous, where gold and silver would vanish from circulation to be replaced by the worthless "notes" of a private banking conglomeration, where the States would be reduced to mere administrative departments of the feds, and where the grasp of taxation would actually reach into the common laborer's paycheck - all this was too fantastic to be even theoretically contemplated during the ratification debates - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)
When the duplicitous Hamilton was asked why he helped draft the Constitution, he guardedly replied:
       My motives must remain in the depository of my own breast.
He was but one member of the Philadelphia Convention who secretly resented the independence of America. One perceptive dissenter realized this and wrote:
The Continental convention...was composed of some men of excellent characters; of others who were more remarkable for their ambition and cunning, than their patriotism; and of some who have been opponents to the independence of the United States - (Dissenting Address of the Pennsylvanian Convention, 18 December 1787)
Hamilton was a member of the traitorous Society of the Cincinnati, named after the Roman dictator. This elitist order included George Washington as head and Major General Henry Knox as secretary. Both men were card-carrying Freemasons and Federalists. They and their cohorts planned to subvert and destroy the American Republic, replacing it with an oligarchy.
...this Constitution was a strange occurrence. Before that time, there was no such thing as a nation being ruled by a constitution. Countries were ruled by kings who granted some rights to the people. Yet governance by constitution had existed in Masonic lodges for hundreds of years - Sanford Holst (Sworn in Secret: Freemasonry and the Knights Templar)
James Madison is considered the "father" of the US Constitution. He was heavily influenced, as were many American politicians, by the philosophy of French aristocrat Baron de Montesquieu who believed in monarchy. Madison was also influenced by the writings of British empiricist philosopher John Locke, himself "a major investor in the English slave trade through the Royal Africa Company." Madison was vehemently opposed to state independence and pushed the Constitution to keep power out of the hands of ordinary Americans. He openly advocated an anti-Republican ideology and commented on how illiterate masses should be divided and controlled:
Where a majority are united by a common sentiment, and have an opportunity, the rights of the minor party become insecure. In a republican government the majority, if united, have always an opportunity. The only remedy is to enlarge the sphere and thereby divide the community into so great a number of interests and parties that, in the first place, a majority will not be likely, at the same moment, to have a common interest separate from that of the whole, or of the minority; and, in the second place, that, in case they should have such an interest, they may not be so apt to unite in the pursuit of it - (Elliot's Debates, Vol. 5)
Madison was the only delegate to keep records of proceedings at the Convention. However, his notes were not made public until four years after his death. Prior to their public release the notes had been thoroughly edited.

The con is evident from the Constitution's Preamble, as we said. In fact the "People" referred to are not citizens of America, No! They are the elites who rule from within a legally separate precinct known as the District of Columbia. This district is under federal control and the government operating from within it is, legally speaking, a foreign institution. The term "We the People"  denotes this separate ruling elite. It refers to the imperious overlords who have granted the Constitution to the masses within the "United States of America" - the non-sovereign nation under their control. Therefore, the entity mentioned in the first line of the Preamble is not the same entity mentioned in the last line. Let's read it again and uncover the cunning artifice of its authors:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
This is what the Preamble subtextually infers:

WE THE RULING ARISTOCRACY, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution FOR THE SLAVES WITHOUT RIGHTS, UNDER OUR FEDERAL CONTROL.

Because "People" is capitalized it is a proper noun referring to a specific body of people - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)
These facts explain why the word "for" is found in the last line, not the word "of." Legally, there is a big difference between:
   ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
   ordain and establish this Constitution of the United States of America.
The first rendering implies the Constitution has been granted to one body by another. Ergo the Constitution is nothing more than a totalitarian document, ratifying aristocratic control over the "United States of America" and its inhabitants. The elites are literally saying: "This document and its articles are for you." The point being that it is not of you, meaning, it is not yours by natural right. The word "for" indicates that the matter of the document is bestowed or imposed by others. And of course when a person gives someone something, they presumably want something in return. This was certainly the case for the cunning Federalists who conceived the Constitution.

Suggestively, the word "of" does appear in a meaningful legal declaration. It appears in the text of the Presidential Oath:
I solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
In this instance, the word "of" designates the President as a member of the aristocratic elite - denoted by the words "United States." He is, therefore, a ruler separate from the citizens in the various states. The "for" does not apply to the President because, unlike the masses, he is not an outsider. He is part of the inner sovereign cadre referenced by the word "of." The Constitution is "of" the ruling elite, but is "for" the masses. In effect the Constitution is a schizophrenic document. There are two Constitutions; one for the serving masses, and one for the served oligarchs ruling from within the legally sacrosanct District of Columbia. This is why the Preamble contains two different terms: the "United States" (denoting the oligarchy and their authority), and "United States of America" (denoting the non-sovereign masses on the receiving end).

If the Presidential Oath read as follows, there would be less cause for concern:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States of America, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.
Then again, pigs might fly. Alarmingly, before it was dropped, the President's original title was "His Excellency."

Many critics and authors have pointed out these disturbing facts and rightly insist that the so-called "United States" is not the same thing as the so-called "United States of America." Nevertheless, due to deliberate misinformation and conditioning, most people do believe the terms refer to one and the same entity. They are certainly not inclined to think of the "United States" (or U.S.) as a foreign corporation. Furthermore, the drafters of the Constitution intentionally saw to it that the term "United States" had more than one meaning. Specifically, they knew the term did not refer to citizens of a state. Once-upon-a-time an American could have been a citizen of a state without being a citizen of the nation. This political idiosyncrasy did not suit the Federalists who ingeniously manipulated the words and terms we are familiar with. It is a old trick that serves the cause of totalitarians everywhere.
...not only were the poly meanings of "United States" intentionally and expressly used within the Constitution, but often in ways as to actually invite confusion. For such brilliant men to explain three jurisdictional concepts would, on its face, pose a great mystery - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)
When members of the police or military swear to serve, uphold and protect the Constitution and "United States," they probably imagine their oath is sworn to the American people. Nothing could be further from the truth. They are in fact swearing to give their labor, and possibly their lives, for the diabolical corporate executives of Washington D.C.
 Oaths of allegiance are fine, as long as you know
who or what your swearing them to.
In short, the U.S. and the U.S.A., are not the same entity. The alleged "People" are not, therefore, free and sovereign members of a country, as they would have been under the Articles of Confederation drawn up after the War of Independence. No, they were and still are merely employees of a privately run corporation. They do not have rights, they have provisionally granted privileges. They have liberty, but do not have permanent and inviolable sovereignty or freedom.
The Constitution, as currently interpreted, now resembles what the Founding Lawyers truly desired in their aristocratic heart of hearts. Two centuries of history have lifted the veil from that picture of Dorian Gray, leaving us with the Hag of Hegemony - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)

The State...both in its genesis and by its primary intention, is purely anti-social. It is not based on the
idea of natural rights, but on the idea that the individual has no rights except those that the State may provisionally grant him -
Albert Jay Nock (Our Enemy: the State)
Hologram of Liberty, by
K. W. Royce. Probably the best book dealing with the con of the Constitution.
The duplicity served to strengthen Federal power. Because of the Constitution, the populace have been intentionally stripped of their sovereign rights. It is also because of this particular chicanery that Americans presently find themselves politically and economically undermined. The Federalist plan was nothing less than an act of war. It was the plan of agent provocateurs and fifth columnists. Only a very few authors have stated this in so many words. However, we are convinced that the early Federalists were ministers of the Crown. They accomplished with their pens what armed legions failed to do by open war.

We believe that after the Constitution was ratified, Americans became, in effect, subjects of an American-based aristocracy. Their boss, King George, did not resend his physical army to attack with force of arms. He and his advisers knew that America could be conquered and brought under their control by more subtle means:
The phrase "direct and immediate allegiance" is something right out of feudal law...Americans who became "U.S. citizens" have transposed themselves from one system into another fundamentally different from the first...Americans have unknowingly joined a modern feudal system in which they must render a percentage of their toil to their federal master - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)

The non-federal state Citizenship became virtually unknown as millions of state Americans were tricked out of their sovereignty and into federal citizenship - and thus into federal jurisdiction. Today, the states have been all but replaced by corporate, federal overlays...There's probably not enough left of the original states for Americans to resume state Citizenship - ibid
These facts show that the Constitution was not a progressive document. On the contrary, its cunning drafters concocted it knowing that it would help to usher in the kind of Merchant State system that flourished earlier in America, before the War of Independence, and shortly after the first settlers arrived, with their British systems of law. As Albert Jay Nock explains:
The fundamental fact to be observed in any survey of the American State's initial development is the one whose importance was first remarked, I believe, by Mr. Beard; that the trading-company - the commercial corporation for colonization - was actually an autonomous State. "Like the State," says Mr. Beard, "it had a constitution, a charter issued by the had a territorial basis, a grant of land often greater in area than a score of European principalities...every essential element long afterward found in the government of the American State appeared in the chartered corporation that started English civilization in America" - (Our Enemy: the State)
Nock goes on to emphasize the connections between the "Old World" system of control and so-called "New World" system:
...the system of civil order established in America was the State-system of the "mother countries"...the
only thing that distinguished it was that the exploited and dependent class was situated at an unusual distance from the owning and exploiting class. The headquarters of the autonomous State were on one side of the Atlantic, and its subjects on the other.
The elites of Britain and Europe knew that remote control was only feasible for a short time. They knew they had to have their agents on site in order for the engines of exploitation to work efficiently. Consequently, in 1628, during the reign of Charles I, the oligarchs established the Massachusetts Bay Company in America. Many of the Constitution's most illustrious signers became wealthy from their memberships of corporations such as the Massachusetts Bay Company which overflowed with agents of the British Crown. Business the American way is, it seems, business the British way.
While it is not surprising that America's Founding Fathers were mostly slave owners, a legal activity,
it may be surprising to discover that they were often smugglers as well. Profits from drug running, smuggling, slave trading, and even piracy are directly responsible for the founding of several of the country's most important banks, which are still in operation today. New England's staunch insurance business was born and prospered through profits earned from insuring opium and slave ships. The large railroad system that was built throughout the continental United States in the nineteenth century was funded with profits from illegal drug smuggling. And one of the greatest opium fortunes would provide seed money for the telephone and communications industry
- Steven Sora (Secret Societies of America's Elite)
Left: The flag of the British East India Company. Right: The Flag of the "United States"
Corporation. Red, White and Blue are known as the Colors of the King. Does this
mean that the "States" are in fact "Estates" of the Crown?
Of course there were clever men who knew what was going on. Even before the Constitution - the document of servitude - was signed and ratified, the warnings went out:
That investigation into the nature and construction of the new constitution, which the conspirators
have so long and zealously struggled against, has, notwithstanding their partial success, so far taken place as to ascertain the enormity of their criminality. That system which was pompously displayed as
the perfection of government, proves upon examination to be the most odious system of tyranny that was ever projected, a many headed hydra of despotism, whose complicated and various evils would be infinitely more oppressive and afflictive than the scourge of any tyrant
- "Centinel" (Essay 12, 23 January 1788)
The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union was America's true constitution before it was unnecessarily derided and overruled by cunning self-serving traitors desperate to create an American monarchy in disguise. Today these men would be referred to as Globalists or Internationalists.
The anonymous author of this diatribe would not be in the least surprised to see the present state of decay, and neither would Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson or Andrew Jackson. They would simply realize that their worst fears were justified.

As we said, the rise of imperialism in America is the result of the "door" being deliberately left ajar, so to speak. The enemies of America were able to creep in whenever they chose. And creep in they did, confident the country would eventually fall into their unworthy hands. They knew their agents were ensconced within the country to misuse their positions of authority within government and big business to gradually undermine the Articles of Confederation that guaranteed each and every American the rights they deserved. They knew they simply had to continue employing the "divide and rule" tactic to further globalist interests.

During his reign King George III adamantly proclaimed his utter hatred for the American rebels and American experiment. He openly declared "eternal" war on America, and his word was law to his many loyal and industrious lieutenants. True to form, agents of the British Crown have been waging eternal war on the country ever since the day of their lunatic master.
The men who undermined the Articles of the Confederation and hustled the Constitution have had statues and portraits raised in their honor. Volumes have been written about their deeds, but rarely has the truth been told, except in alternative circles. Throughout America and the world the traitors are lauded as great revolutionaries, reformers and humanitarians. Their ideological descendants openly and unashamedly work hand in hand with British and European oligarchs, using fear and panic to further their agendas. They continue to erode whatever is left of the privileges once bestowed upon their slaves.
We have "federal sheriffs" beyond imagination. There are forty six civilian agencies of the Federal Government whose agents carry guns and have the power to make arrests. These "great insults on the people" have been allowed because there is little we can do about them, short of armed rebellion. And by the way, no laws authorizing "civil forfeiture" or other related measures of tyranny have been struck down by the federal courts - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)

We have plenty of rights in this country, provided you don't get caught exercising them - Terry Mitchell (Editor of The Revolutionary Toker)
Patrick Henry was one patriot who understood what was going on. He did not attend the Convention in Philadelphia, and said: "I smell a rat." He was dead right. But there was more than one stinking human rat loose at the Convention. The traitors referred to themselves as "Federalists" because they knew the people would think of them as servants of America. And they were right. Their smokescreen worked wonderfully. Today the misuse of words and terms continues. George Bush's "Patriot Acts" dupe the uninformed masses and give them the impression it is patriotic to give up hard won rights in turn for government protection.
For centuries, pillage by invading armies was a normal part of warfare…Nowadays, at least in more civilized countries, we do not let armies rampage for booty. We leave the pillaging to men in suits,
and we don’t call it pillaging anymore. We call it economic development
- Brian Whitaker (The Guardian)
The Bushes did as their predecessors had done two hundred years ago. The Federalist traitors hurried the ratification process along and gave the Convention delegates and American people little time to scrutinize the Constitution's articles. George W. Bush did likewise when it came to his scurrilous Patriot Acts. Moreover, he personally saw to it that the investigations into the causes of the September Eleventh tragedy were hampered and limited:
President Bush personally asked Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle…to limit the Congressional investigation into the events of September 11, Congressional and White House sources told CNN…The request was made at a private meeting with Congressional leaders - Gore Vidal (Dreaming War)
George W. Bush's lack of regard for the Constitution is not unique. As a Globalist he does not serve America or the interests of American people. He is one of many men who have used the Constitution as a stepping stone toward what might be described as an world super state. Nowadays the conspirators who labor toward this utopian wet-dream appear to be less inclined to conceal the reasons for their intrigue. As George W. Bush himself put it:
It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance - (Address to the UN General Assembly, February 1 1992)

The world can therefore seize the opportunity (the Persian Gulf crisis) to fulfill the long held promise
of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind
- (State of the Union Address, January 29 1991)
Author Forrest MacDonald clarified the issue concerning the undermining of the Articles of Confederation. In his book entitled Alexander Hamilton: A Biography, he wrote:
What did determine the outcome were the rules of the contest, which Hamilton played an important part in formulating. The convention decided to disregard the amendment procedures prescribed in the Articles of Confederation and instead provided that each state should hold a special election for delegates to a ratifying convention...Had the rules of the Articles of Confederation been adhered to, the Constitution would never have been adopted.
The dissenters knew what lay in store and were worried. Their warnings went largely unheard and the ratification of the Constitution hurriedly commenced regardless of the warnings of perceptive critics:
It is insisted, indeed, that this constitution must be received, be it ever so imperfect. But remember, when the people once part with power, they can seldom or never resume it again by by force. Many instances can be produced in which the people have voluntarily increased the powers of their rulers; but few, if any, in which rulers have willingly abridged their authority - "Brutus" (Essay 1, 18 October 1787)

Consider what you are about to do before your part with this Government. Take longer time in reckoning things: Revolutions like this have happened in almost every country in Europe: Similar examples are...ancient Greece and ancient Rome: Instances of the people losing their liberty by their own carelessness and the ambition of a few - Patrick Henry (Speech of 5 June 1778)

Does it not insult your judgment to tell you, Adopt first, and then amend?...Is your rage for novelty so great, that you are first to sign and seal, and then retract?...agree to bind yourself hand and foot - for the sake of what? of being unbound? go into a dungeon - for what? To get out? Is there no danger, when you go in, that the bolts of federal authority shall shut you in? - Patrick Henry (Speech to the Virginia ratifying assembly 1788)

I look upon the Constitution as the most fatal plan that could possibly be conceived to enslave a free people - ibid
No sooner was the Constitution ratified than the oligarchs began acting tyrannically toward the American people. British agent President George Washington - who presided over the signing of the Constitution and who was a member of the Ohio Company of Virginia, the Mississippi Company, and the Potomac Company - sent thirteen thousand armed troops to violently stamp out the so-called Whiskey Rebellion of 1794. This rebellion was against heavy taxation.

The victims of government oppression soon discovered they could not use the Constitution to receive justice. It contained little provision for the underclasses. It gave complete suzerainty to the courts and judges, not to the people or states. To all intents and purposes it was as if the War of Independence had never been fought.

The Constitution merely made it possible for agents of the British Crown to operate as if they served the citizens of America. In this regard, nothing has changed.

The facts about the American Revolution show that in the early days, in the mid 1770's, the colonialists suffered a series of defeats. Strategic secrets were being passed to the British. The facts also show that an American army general, Benedict Arnold, was a traitor who plotted to surrender the fort at West Point to the British and turn the tide of war against his own side. The facts link Washington with Arnold when it comes to Freemasonry and the facts show that the day the plot was discovered, Washington was due to meet Arnold at West Point...Washington has been working with Arnold and passing secrets to the British - Robert Cooper (Interview on Dan Brown's The Lost Symbol)
The tyranny continued in 1798 with the Alien and Sedition Acts. These Acts made criticism of federal officials a punishable offense. The Constitution served to strengthen the powers of the wealthy aristocratic class in America. It possessed few benefits for the average citizen and ultimately legalized widespread acts of confiscation and extortion. As Thomas Jefferson once remarked: "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." The point is emphasized by Constitutional scholar and author Kenneth W. Royce:
If analyzed in contrast to history since 1787, it appears that the Constitution was purposely laden
with several components designed to nearly guarantee the gradual expansion of the Federal Government - at the expense of the States and the people -
(Hologram of Liberty)
The Founding Fathers may have referred to themselves as Federalists. But this was, as we said, yet one more cunning play on words. Master propagandists such as Vladimir Lenin probably learned tactics from America's faux Federalists.
Patrick Henry is known for his "Give me Liberty or give me Death!" speech. Along with Samuel Adams and Thomas Paine, he is remembered as one of the most influential and radical advocates of the American Revolution and of Republicanism, especially in his denunciations of corruption of government officials - (Wikipedia Online Encyclopedia)
The original Federalists demanded a government of limited powers and were for State power. Their needs were ably met by the Articles of Confederation ratified in 1781. After the War of Independence (1775 to 1783), Americans had the Constitution forced upon them. Ever since then Americans have been duped about the prestige of the document. The people and representatives of the original thirteen states were not allowed enough time to decide whether the document was sound or not. Patrick Henry questioned the haste and warned of the consequences of accepting the Constitution without due consideration and debate. He knew that State representatives needed at least a year to mull over the articles of the Constitution. He spoke out and said:
Why then tell us of dangers to terrify us into an adoption of this new Government? And yet who knows the dangers that this new system may produce; they are out of sight of the common people: They cannot foresee latent consequences: I dread the operation of it on the middling and lower class of people: It is for them I fear the adoption of this system...I see jeopardy in this new Government. I see none from our present one.
As we said, the Constitution's articles scandalously allowed the Supreme Court to possess almost unlimited legal powers:
No country has given its courts such extraordinary power. Not Britain, where an act of Parliament binds the courts. Not India...Not even West Germany or Ireland, where the power of judicial review is established but exercised on a narrower scale. The President is elected. State legislators and Governors are elected. Supreme Court Justices are not elected: they are appointed for life - Archibald Cox (The Court and the Constitution)
Despite widespread resistance and a spirit of animosity toward the Constitution's articles, its cheerleaders Madison, Hamilton, Franklin and Washington relentlessly pressed on. They ensured that resistance to their will was summarily suppressed.
Most troublesome to the framers of the Constitution was the increasing insurgent spirit evidenced among the people. Fearing the popular takeover of state governments, the wealthy class looked to a national government as a means of protecting their interests. Even in states where they were inclined to avoid strong federation, the rich, once faced with the threat of popular rule and realizing that a political alliance with conservatives from other states would be a safeguard if the radicals could capture the state government...gave up 'state rights' for 'nationalism' without hesitation - Michael Parenti (Democracy for the Few)

Within a month after the 17 September signing, a torrent of anti-constitution essays appeared in the newspapers, pleasing for prudent wisdom. This horrified three particular federalists, who quickly went
on the editorial offensive in what was to be a staggering 85 essays totaling some 175,000 words. The Federalist Papers were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay to defend the proposed Constitution...Hamilton, Madison, and Jay hid for years behind the pseudonym "Publius" conceal from the public their true identities, and Convention attendance
- Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)
George Washington addressing the delegates during the signing of the US Constitution. Benjamin Franklin (a member of the English Hell Fire Club) is shown in the center of the canvas. His design for the Seal of the United States depicted Moses leading the Children of Israel across the Red Sea. Franklin's nickname among his elite secret society chums was "Moses." Like his many Masonic associates in America, England and France, he was an Atonist or in conventional parlance a Luciferian. His backers were powerful royal figures such as Charles de Lorraine and the Duke d'Orleans. The last thing on his mind was freedom for the American people. He was a wealthy speculator in land, and a member of the Vandalia Company, whose land grant happened (coincidentally of course) to have been awarded by the British Crown.
The secretiveness of the proceedings at the Convention reinforced the suspicions of many critics of the Constitution. Kenneth W. Royce tell us:
Little wonder why the Constitution operated under such extraordinary secrecy. Held on the second floor, windows shut, with sentries posted below, the delegates were sworn to strict silence. Not until 32 years later (a generation, you see) were the proceeding's Journals published. Madison's notes (thoroughly edited) weren't published until 53 years later, in 1840. 
Royce also comments on the measures taken by the Federalists to conceal the infighting that took place among delegates at the Convention:
Great propaganda measures were employed to conceal the Convention's true atmosphere of acrimonious dissent.
The state of affairs was noted by a journalist, who wrote:
So great is the unanimity, we hear, that prevails in the Convention, upon all great federal subjects, that it has been proposed to call the room in which they assemble - Unanimity Hall - (Pennsylvania Packet and Daily Advertiser, 19 July 1787)
Fifty five delegates attended the Philadelphia Convention - forty one politicians and thirty four lawyers. Not a single person from the working class was present. Those men who attempted to delay proceedings by boycotting the Convention were sought out by troops and forcibly dragged to the Convention hall.
Electing the respected General George Washington as Convention president, with the added presence of Benjamin Franklin, was responsible for much of the public's "false confidences." Of the 55 delegates, 41 were politicians and 34 were lawyers...According to delegate James McHenry, at least 21 of the 55 delegates favored some form of monarchy - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)

…in 1782 (Washington) received a letter from Colonel Lewis Nicola urging him to use the army to make himself King. He rejected the proposal with great indignation. Washington, it seems felt that America would eventually become a monarchy; indeed, he admitted the necessity of the principle of monarchy. But it seems he could not reconcile this view with his Templar philosophy, which demanded a republic - Nicholas Hagger (The Secret History of the West)
Prime mover in the conspiracy to undermine the Articles of Confederation was the traitor Alexander Hamilton. In The Federalist Papers, Douglas Adair comments on Hamilton's dilemma:
Hamilton's disillusion with the workings of the Confederation and his fear of democracy, especially after Shay's Rebellion, had convinced him that it would be almost impossible to set up a stable republic in a country as large as the United States. As he informed the Convention, any society in which political power was vested in the hands of all the people would be continually torn by the class struggles of the rich and poor. Hamilton's remedy for this class war the Hobbesian expedient of setting up a leviathan state to impose order upon the American People from above, Hamilton was sure that the only alternative to social anarchy was the establishment of a consolidated government capable of maintaining itself independently of the people's will.
Hamilton's tactics worked. He knew the mindset of the men he represented. He knew all he had to do was instill enough fear into the delegates to achieve the desired result. Federalists and Globalists continue to employ this ruse to further agendas. It is little more than conflict control.
That was the genius of the Constitution: To 1. utterly transform political reality without the people understanding it; 2. destroy the States without sound or smoke and 3. foist a government destined to become, over the distant horizon, fully national in scope and authority. By the time the States and the people would realize they'd been trumped, it would be too late - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)
Hamilton, Madison and their Federalist gang of conspirators were ecstatic over the success of their "divide and rule" tactics. After the damage was done Madison bragged about the debacle he had deliberately helped foment:
One anti-federalist opinion tell us that the proposed constitution ought to be rejected because it is not a confederation of the States, but a government over individuals. Another admits that it ought to be a government over individuals to a certain extent but by no means to extent proposed. A third does not object to a government over individuals but to the want of a bill of rights. A fourth concurs in the absolute necessity of a bill of rights but contends that it ought to be declaratory, not for the personal rights of individuals, but of the rights reserved to the States in their political capacity. A fifth is of the opinion that a bill of rights of any sort would be superfluous and misplaced and that the plan would be unexceptional except for the fatal power of regulating the times and place of elections.
Thomas Jefferson (principle author of the Declaration of Independence) was appalled at the liberties taken by Hamilton and those he continued taking in the years following the Constitution's ratification. He noticed Hamilton was contemptuous of the Constitution he himself cheerled, and as ambitiously attempting to obtain broader powers for central government. Hamilton soon proposed changes well outside the scope of the Constitution's precepts. Obviously, the Constitution was merely one means to many ends for Hamilton and his self-serving aristocratic cronies. Incensed by Hamilton's scheming Jefferson wrote:
I will not suffer...the slanders of Hamilton whose history, from the moment at which history can stoop to notice him, is a tissue of machinations against the liberty of the country which has not only received and given him bread, but heaped honors on his head - (Jefferson to Washington, 1792)
Eventually even Hamilton's colleague James Madison began to chafe at his obvious disdain for the people and Constitutional provisos:
As Madison watched Hamilton's program develop, he became disillusioned and bitter. In the Convention he had fought to create a Constitution under which 'the interests and rights of every class of citizen should be duly represented and understood.' Now he saw the machinery of his new government being used to exploit the mass of the people in the interest of a small minority - Douglas Adair (The Federalist Papers)
Among Hamilton's most insidious programs was the creation of the first private bank. He pushed for the establishment of this scurrilously extortionist organization. His co-conspirator, arch-traitor Robert Morris, was undoubtedly an agent of European aristocracy.
Financial genius Robert Morris organized the first bank. He and his associates believed that the bank should be modeled after the Bank of England…Secret investors put up $400,000 to start this bank. This attempt failed after two short years…Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton, submitted a proposal to Congress in 1790 for a central bank. Interestingly enough, Hamilton had been an aide of Robert Morris in the initial experience of central banking in North America - Bill Hughes (The Secret Terrorists)

Financier Nicholas Biddle was president of the Second National Bank of the United States, established in 1817. He was a servant of the Jesuits, and may have been in contact with the Rothschilds or their predecessors, the Hahns, themselves directed by powerful European royals
(see references below).

Jewish financier Haym Solomon. A precursor to the Rothschilds, he was a close colleague of Robert Morris. The intrigue of affluent Jewish financier families has been tracked and detailed by several authors (see references below).

The insidious pirate, slave-trader and arch-traitor Robert Morris was the buddy of Alexander Hamilton and Haym Solomon. In 1791 he was appointed U.S. Superintendent of Finance.
Arch-traitor Aaron Burr. Relatively unknown to most Americans, Burr was a prime mover within the cabal that worked to undermine American sovereignty. This truly insidious character's plotting is revealed in Anton Chaitkin's masterly work Treason in America.
Norman Dodd, Research Director of the 1950s Reese Commission - which investigated America's tax-exempt foundations - finally uncovered the dirt on Morris:
Robert Morris (signer of the Declaration of Independence) was the personality in this country who used his fortune to finance the Continental army and at the end of the revolution, Mr. Morris found himself diluted of his fortune. So after the revolution was over he then turned his attention to, as an individual, of rebuilding a fortune and his area of activity was in land speculation. At that time he was contacted by an agent of wealth lodged abroad and this wealth was represented by an entity which is historically referred to as the “House of Orange.” However, we did know the agent of the House of Orange who contacted Robert Morris after he began to rebuild his fortune, and that personality was a man by the name of Haym Saloman, and he was an agent of the House of Orange in this country, and it was through him that Mr. Morris was offered considerable financial accommodation, which would enable him to, working capital, you might say, to rebuild his fortune.
Haym Soloman was, of course, a servant of the Jewish Kahal and Jesuit Order. Like the Rothschilds who rose to power shortly after his time, Solomon was a lackey of European royalty - the Hanoverians, Hapsburgs, Stuarts, and related houses. King George III (America's arch-enemy) was a senior member of the Dutch House of Orange or Hanover.
The royals maintain control over their disposable lieutenants by way of Masonic societies such as the Skull and Bones and Bohemian Club. The double-headed eagle (emblem of Scottish Rite Masonry) is identical to the royal arms of European dynasties such as the Hapsburgs.
These royal dynasties own corporations and businesses all over the world and have the power and skill to purchase and use men as easily as they do companies. Of course they do not openly display their colors. They are discreet and prefer to exercise control by way of devious but disposable agents, faceless companies and shadowy banking houses. One of the most important aristocratically controlled engines is the Société Générale de Belgique (Society General of Belgium). From 1840 to 1870 (before the Rothschilds were handed the wheel), this financial consortium was directly controlled by Belgium's King Leopold II, grandson of Queen Victoria and member of the powerful Saxe-Coburg-Gotha dynasty. The Society was founded in 1822, by none other than King William I of the House of Orange. America's number one enemy, King George III, was of the same royal line as William I. Their ancestor, Duchess Sophia of Hanover was heir to the English throne. Her son became George I of Great Britain. His grandson was infamous King George III. These monarchs were members of the so-called "Black Nobility" of Venice and Holland. By way of their financial consortiums they and their relatives maintained control remotely over colonies that included America.
The corporate name that is assigned to that entity, as the 18th turned into the 19th century, is called Societie Genearale de Belgique, which is the largest accumulation of privately controlled tangible
wealth in the world
- Andrew Power (Ireland: Land of the Pharaohs)

William of Orange it was...who established the original SGDB which was to finance the growth of a great part of Belgian industry and which today remains by far the most important single force in the country’s economic life. La Generale list the Belgian royal family as well as the Vatican among its shareholders in addition to that all-powerful family alliance behind Belgian finances – the Solvays, the Boels and the Janssens…In 1838 the rival Banque de Belgique succumbed to the general crisis in Europe and closed its doors but the SGDB, supported by the Rothschilds, remained open, paying out coin against the notes issued by its competitor - ibid

Prince Bernhard is known to be an influential member of the SGDB, a mysterious organization that seems to be an association of large corporate interests from many countries. American firms associated with this society are said to be among the large corporations whose officers are members of the Council on Foreign Relations and related organizations - Dan Smoot (The Invisible Government)
Because of the intervention of men such as Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson, the Federalist program to socially and economically undermine America temporarily failed. But time was on the side of the conspiring Nationalists. The second Federal Bank was established six years later, in 1816. President Monroe appointed Jesuit agent Nicholas Biddle as its first president.
Nicholas Biddle, another one of their agents, carried out phase two of the Jesuit attack. Biddle was a brilliant financier, having graduated from the University of Pennsylvania at the age of thirteen. He was
a master of the science of money. By the time that Jackson had come to the Presidency in 1828, Biddle was in full control of the Federal government’s central bank. This was not the first time that a central bank had been established. Twice before, first under Robert Morris, and then under Alexander Hamilton, had a central bank been tried, but in both cases it had failed because of fraudulent actions on the part of the bankers who were in control. After the war of 1812, a central bank was tried again, and it was in this third attempt that we find Mr. Biddle -
Bill Hughes (The Secret Terrorists)
The scandalous intrigue of affluent, influential Jewish financier families, such as Rothschild, Oppenheimer, Lazard, Warburg, Schiff, Kuhn, Loeb, Goldman, Sachs, and so on, has been tracked and delineated by several authors. 
Under the surface, the Rothschilds long had a powerful influence in dictating American financial laws. The law records show that they were powers in the old Bank of the United States - Gustavus Meyers (History of the Great American Fortunes)
The evidence clearly shows these families were no friends of America. The Rothschilds in particular received prestigious awards from America's deadliest enemies. For services rendered leading members of the Rothschild family have been endowed with elite status by royals and popes. Amschel Mayer Rothschild, for example, was a Knight of Malta.
The Holy Roman Emperors from the House of Habsburg kept a considerable number of court Jews. Among those of Emperor Ferdinand II are mentioned the following: Solomon and Ber Mayer...Joseph Pincherle of Görz; Moses and Joseph Marburger (Morpurgo) of Gradisca; Ventura Pariente of Trieste;
the physician Elijah Chalfon of Vienna; Samuel zum Drachen, Samuel zum Straussen, and Samuel zum Weissen Drachen of Frankfort-on-the-Main; and Mordecai Meisel, of Prague. A specially favored court
Jew was Jacob Bassevi, the first Jew to be ennobled, with the title "von Treuenberg"
- (Wikipedia Online Encyclopedia. Entry on Court Jews)
Wilhelm IX, Elector of Hesse-Kassel. He employed Mayer Amschel Rothschild. We must inquire why a royal personage, occupying the highest strata of society, would employ and promote a Jewish ghetto-dweller.

Undoubtedly the Rothschild brothers financially backed the Federalists in a similar manner as they backed the Duke of Wellington, Cecil Rhodes, Vladimir Lenin, Leon Trotsky, Adolf Hitler, and many other fascists and megalomaniacs. But they were not the first to do so. Agents of the Jesuit Order and Jewish Kahal, such as Haym Solomon, had clearly been active in Federalist circles before the Rothschild dynasty were given the reins of financial control. In any case, the Rothschilds and their agents - the Schiffs, Bauers, Oppenheimers and Warburgs - were unquestionably instrumental in formulating the so-called Jekyll Island Agreement which was the basis for the creation of the private Federal Reserve Bank. The Federal Reserve Act was passed on December 22, 1913. Interestingly, this is the time of the Winter Solstice, an important day on the Luciferian calendar.
In 1781, Congress established the Office of Finance to save the United States from fiscal ruin. Salomon allied himself with Superintendent of Finance William Morris and became one of the most effective brokers
of bills of exchange to meet federal government expenses. Salomon also personally advanced funds to members of the Continental Congress and other federal officers, charging interest and commissions well below the market rates -
Michael Feldberg (Haym Salomon: The Rest of the Story)
James Madison confessed that "I have for some time...been a pensioner on the favor of Haym Salomon, a Jew broker" - ibid

Solomon supposedly wrote the first draft of the United States Constitution according to some historians. Some claim that he designed the Great Seal of the United States, which is why it has what some believe resembles a Jewish Star above the eagle's head design, and it is also on the back of every American one dollar bill. He believed the United States would become a world power - (Hyam Solomon Bio, website)

The blunt reality is that the Rothschild banking dynasty in Europe was the dominant force, both financially and politically, in the formation of the Bank of the United States - G. Edward Griffin (The Creature from Jekyll Island)

The Rothschilds were Jesuits who used their Jewish background as a façade to cover their sinister activities. The Jesuits, working through Rothschild and Biddle, sought to gain control of the banking
system of the United States -
Bill Hughes (The Secret Terrorists)

Over the years since N. M. Rothschild...had been, for a time, the official European banker for the U.S., government and was a pledged supporter of the Bank of the United States - Derek Wilson (Rothschild:
The Wealth and Power of a Dynasty

He was lord and master of the money-market of the world, and of course virtually lord and master of everything else…He literally held the revenues of Southern Italy in pawn, and monarchs and ministers of all countries courted his advice and were guided by his suggestions - Benjamin Disraeli (Prime Minister of England writing on Lord Rothschild)

Aware that the Rothschilds are an important Jewish family, I looked them up in Encyclopedia Judaica
and discovered that they bear the title “Guardians of the Vatican Treasury”…The appointment of Rothschild gave the black papacy absolute financial power and secrecy. Who would ever search a family of orthodox Jews for the key to the wealth of the Roman Catholic Church? - 
F. Tupper Saussy (Rulers of Evil)
The Hofjuden (Court Jews)

Amschel Mayer Rothschild fathered five sons who jointly formed one of the most powerful banking families in history. Amschel died in 1812, which means he may have actively conspired with the Federalists who attempted to found the first US federal bank in 1791. By 1789, Amschel was assisting the House of Hesse and British Crown with their attempts to undermine Napoleon.


Mayer Amschel Rothschild took over the reigns from his father. He was a Knight of Malta. Elite Masonic Jews have long worked as money men and advisers to Turks, Huns, and Church of Rome. Mayer died in 1855, which means he was in a position to involve himself in the conspiracy to open the second US Federal bank.


Nathan Mayer Rothschild was in charge of the London branch of his family's banking cartel. He was already working in the Stock Exchange from 1804. He established his London bank in 1811. He died in 1836. Of course, long before Nathan's time, Jewish financiers had been active in England. For example, during the Civil War (1642–1651), Manasseh Ben Israel, funded the tyrant Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell personally overturned the legislation banning Jews from England. (Here for more.)

James Mayer Rothschild was adviser to two French kings. Highly decorated, he and his four brothers were bestowed the hereditary title of Baron by Austria's Francis II (the Holy Roman Emperor). James was also appointed consul-general of the Austrian Empire and, in 1823, he was awarded the French Legion of Honor. The predecessors of the Rothschilds were the Hahn family. The Rothschilds are related to the Bauers, Oppenheimers, Warburgs and Schiffs. These Khazarian crime-families were able lieutenants of royalty, not the architects of control, as many misinformed authors believe. They exercise enormous influence over the American government by way of Masonic lodges and Federal orgs such as the Federal Reserve Banks.

The facts show that traitorous Nationalists (or should we say Internationalists), such as Hamilton, Morris, Solomon, Burr and Biddle did not have the best interests of ordinary Americans at heart. On the contrary, by way of their Constitution, and later by way of their banks and credit houses, they sought to subjugate and impoverish the citizens of America. In his excellent books The Secret Terrorists and Enemy Unmasked, Bill Hughes details the strong-arm methods used by Biddle to force wary President Andrew Jackson into commissioning the founding of the Federal Bank:
Biddle responded to Jackson refusing to allow him to re-establish the central bank by shrinking the nation’s money supply. He did this by refusing to make loans. By so doing, he upended the economy and money disappeared. Unemployment ran high. Companies  went bankrupt because they could not pay their loans…So confident was he that he publicly boasted that he had caused the economic wars in America.

Is there no danger to our liberty and independence in a bank that in its nature has so little to bind it to
our country? Is there not cause to tremble for the purity of our elections in peace and for the independence of our country in war? Controlling our currency, receiving our public monies, and holding themselves in dependence, it would be more formidable and dangerous than a naval and military power of the enemy
- President Andrew Jackson
Because Andrew Jackson persistently resisted the threats and devices of the bankers, he was the victim of an attempted assassination. The gunman was a certain Richard Lawrence. G. Edward Griffin wrote:
…Lawrence...boasted to friends that he had been in touch with powerful people in Europe who had promised to protect him from punishment should he be caught - (The Creature from Jekyll Island)
The Federal bankers caused the Depression of 1929, and saw to it that thousands of American businesses were ruined. They funded Adolf Hitler, and financed Lenin's murderous Bolsheviks. Avaricious financial organizations that plague the planet, such as the World Bank and IMF (International Monetary Fund), are merely tentacles of the Federal System.
Immense sums belonging to our national depositors have been given to Germany on no collateral security whatsoever…Billions upon billions of our money has been pumped into Germany by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks - H. S. Kenan (The Federal Reserve Bank)
Sir Joseph Stamp was director of the Bank of England from 1928 to 1941. He openly addressed the colossal power of the Bankers:
The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in iniquity and born in sin. Bankers own the Earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of a pen they will create enough money to buy it back again...Take this great power away from them and all great fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to disappear, for then this would be a better and happier world to live in. But if you want to continue to be slaves of the banks and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let the bankers continue to create money and control credit.
President Thomas Jefferson was not a Freemason, and not the least bit interested in amassing personal wealth. He had no love for the Federal bank and made his position clear:
A private central bank issuing the public currency is a greater menace to the liberties of the people than a standing army...We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt.

I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then
by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people
of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.
Nevertheless Jefferson's reputation is marred on several accounts, not least by his appointment of British agent Albert Gallatin as Secretary of the Treasury in 1801. In the same year Gallatin was also appointed Vice President. Regrettably, a statue of the duplicitous Geneva-born Gallatin stands to this day outside the United States Treasury building in Washington DC.

It is interesting and suggestive to note that Alexander Hamilton's banking system precisely paralleled that used by British bankers. He favored what is known as the tontine capitalist system:
His tontine scheme, fashioned after the British tontine of 1789, involved a system of rights of annual payments to survivors, the annuities therefrom becoming the means of creating a permanent investment class - Frank Bourgin (The Great Challenge: The Myth of Laissez-Faire in the Early Republic)
Political figures of intelligence and cunning knew the real reason for the War of Independence. They knew it had to do with money and usury, and with nationwide colonization, confiscation, and extortion. They knew the conflict was fomented by British and European banks, eager to establish control over America, as they had throughout the world. This fact is admitted by British agent Benjamin Franklin whose comment takes us to the heart of the matter:
The inability of the Colonists to get power to issue their own money permanently out of the hands of
King George III and the international bankers, was the prime reason for the revolutionary war
The Colonists were not able to free themselves from the clutches of the international bankers and royal overlords. The War of Independence was not a victory for the citizens of America. On the contrary, it was yet one more victory for the aristocracy that has controlled America from the beginning.
As with the real first bank, the government had been the only depositor to put up any real money, with the remainder being raised from loans the investors made to each other, using the magic of fractional reserve banking. When time came for renewal of the charter, the bankers were warning of bad times ahead if they didn't get what they wanted. The charter was not renewed. Five month later Britain had attacked America and started the war of 1812 - (Money as History)

Few people are aware today that the history of the United States, since the Revolution in 1776, has
been, in large part, the story of an epic struggle to get free, and stay free, of control by the European international banks. This struggle was finally lost in 1913, when President Woodrow Wilson signed the into effect the Federal Reserve Act, putting the International Banking Cartel in charge of creating America's money -
Paul Grignon (Money as Debt)
Thomas Jefferson mentioned the nefarious power of the bankers directly, saying desperately:
I wish it were possible to obtain a single amendment to our Constitution - taking from the federal government their power of borrowing.
After Alexander Hamilton's gang had established the Federal Bank, and the Judiciary with its unlimited power, Jefferson's illusions concerning America's fate were gone. In 1821, five years before he died, he recorded his misgivings and foreboding:
It has long...been my opinion...that the germ of dissolution of our federal judiciary is in the constitution of the federal judiciary; an irresponsible body working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped from the states, and the government of all be consolidated into one. To this I am opposed, because when all government...shall be drawn to Washington as the center of all power, it will render powerless the checks provided of one government on another, and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated.

Our government is now taking so steady a course as to show by what road it will pass to destruction,
to wit, by consolidation first, and then corruption, its necessary consequences.
The following year Jefferson's insight sharpened all the more. His words reveal the accuracy of his foresight:
If ever this vast country is brought under a single government, it will be one of the most extensive corruption...
In fact Jefferson had misgivings about the state of affairs in America many years before he wrote these words.  Between 1784 and 1789 he had been living in France as minister to that country. Upon his return to America he was horrified to see how little effect the grand precepts and provisos of the Declaration of Independence, which he had chiefly formulated, had made. Alfred Jay Knock explains:
On arriving in New York and resuming his place in the social life of the country, he was greatly depressed by the discovery that the principles of the Declaration had gone wholly by the board. No one spoke of natural rights and popular sovereignty, it would seem actually that no one had ever heard of them. On the contrary, everyone was talking about the pressing need of a strong central coercive authority, able to check the incursions which the "democratic spirit" was likely to incite upon "the men of principle and property"...Clearly, though the Declaration might have been the charter of American independence, it was in no sense the charter of the new American State - (Our Enemy: the State)
Thomas Jefferson. Along with William Paterson, Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry and Samuel Adams, he put state rights before the demands of insatiable tyrannous Federalists. He understood that the Constitution works on a state level, but does not work when it is interpreted and implemented on the Federal level, by men who can not only force states to submit to the Federal will, but who print money to thereby cover up their failures and perpetuate their unsustainable policies that would be shot down on the state level.

Patrick Henry, long time critic of the Constitution's drafters, also clearly foresaw the totalitarianism of the Federalists:
My great objection to this Government is, that it does not leave us the means of defending our rights; or of waging war against tyrants...Have we the means of resisting disciplined armies, when our only defense, the militia, is put into the hands of Congress? - (Speech of 5 June, 1788)

Did you ever read of any revolution in any nation, brought about by the punishment of those in
power, inflicted by those who had no power at all?...Will your Mace-bearer be a match for a disciplined regiment?...Will the oppressor ever let go of the oppressed? Was there ever an instance? Can the annals of mankind exhibit one single example, where rulers, overcharged with power, willingly let go of the oppressed?
- ibid

A standing army we shall have also, to execute the execrable commands of tyranny - ibid
Alfred Jay Nock summarizes the travesty and the tragedy in these words:
Nowhere in the history of the constitutional period do we find the faintest suggestion of the Declaration's doctrine of natural rights, and we find its doctrine of popular sovereignty not only continuing in abeyance, but constitutionally estopped from ever reappearing. Nowhere do we find
a trace of the Declaration's theory of government, on the contrary, we find it expressly repudiated.
The new political mechanism was a faithful replica of the old disestablished British model, but so far improved and strengthened as to be incomparably more close-working and efficient...presenting more attractive possibilities of capture and control -
(Our Enemy: the State)
Nothing that governments do is new. Despots within government operate according to plans that are repeated in various ways over generations. Their control is aided and abetted by their co-conspirators in the media. The politicians and media spin doctors are instructed by overlords who control the private banks and "philanthropic" foundations.
Public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment nothing can fail. Without it nothing can succeed. He who molds opinion is greater than he who enacts laws - Abraham Lincoln
In many cases the politicians, media men and bankers are themselves under the tutelage and direction of British and European aristocracy who have made the "board," so to speak, on which the great geopolitical games are played.

The conspirators who organize the geopolitical game are cautious and do not want their true allegiances or diabolical schemes to be publicly exposed. Each group and individual conspirator knows how vulnerable they are. They know the facts about their true allegiances and agendas must never leak out to the masses at large. Their success depends upon human apathy and ignorance.
In "Red Dusk and the Morrow" Sir Paul Dukes, formerly Chief of the British Secret Service in Russia, we read that a Lithuanian asked a prominent Bolshevik how the regime was maintained. The answer was: "Our power is based on three things: first, on Jewish brains; secondly, on Lettish and Chinese bayonets; and thirdly, on the crass stupidity of the Russian people - Denis Fahey (The Rulers of Russia)
The elitist conspirators also know that should civil unrest occur, the masses can be forced back into line by threats to their material and emotional security. The strategy is tried and true, and usually works wonders. As Ernest Hemingway explained:
The first panacea for a mismanaged nation is inflation of the currency; the second is war. Both bring
a temporary prosperity and both bring a permanent ruin. But both are the refuge of political and economic opportunists
The Trinity of Slavery. This basic diagram delineates how Atonist royals maintain world control. By way of theology and politics are human hearts and minds enslaved. Through secret societies the hierarchy of control is perpetuated and monitored. As French poet Charles Peguy wrote: "Tyranny is always better organized that freedom."

Because of the confessions and evidence provided by intelligent, informed whistle-blowers from within religion, politics, royalty and masonry, we know a great deal about how the engines of world and mind control operate. However there are pitfalls when insiders with myopic insight and inflexible allegiances and prejudices attempt to instruct the masses as to the intricacies of oligarchic control. When it comes to exposing the dirty little secrets, and dirty big secrets of those occupying the highest levels of the Atonist power-pyramid, objectivity is essential. Photographs of their hideous visages, taken from a rickety platform constructed by their agents, will be “blurred” and inadequate, to say the least
An alternative schemata of the pyramid of enslavement shows that sociopolitical power descends from the highest unseen level to operatives making up the elusive College of Cardinals situated in Rome and elsewhere. This level of Solar Cult agents includes the infamous Jesuit Order and so-called Illuminati. Next, a measure of power flows down to the level of the many secret societies that plague the world. Although these denominations may have a Protestant or Catholic, liberal or conservative coloring, they are all controlled by the same nefarious Luciferian cadre. From here, when necessary, sociopolitical power is loaned to the world's ardent psychotic Kabalists, better known to the world as "Zionists." The highest echelon within this branch know that their ideology has little to do with official Judaism, as it has been put before us. They know they are the privileged descendents of ancestors who long served ancient imperial concerns, such as the Merovingians and Hapsburgs, etc. When necessary, this group lends a modicum of sociopolitical power to the lowest level of ill-informed but violent extremists of all persuasions to run amok with their fanatical ideologies, deliberately wreaking havoc and unrest, so higher agendas are not uncovered and thwarted.
Philosopher Ayn Rand frequently warned readers about the evils of big government:
Instead of being a protector of man’s rights, the government is becoming their most dangerous violator; instead of guarding freedom the government is establishing slavery; instead of protecting men from the initiators of physical force, the government is initiating physical force and coercion in any manner and issue it pleases; instead of serving as the instrument of objectivity in human relationships, the government is creating a deadly subterranean reign of uncertainty and fear…instead of protecting men from injury by whim, the government is arrogating to itself the power of unlimited whim, so that we are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force.
Rand laid it on the line when addressing the crimes of government:
Criminals are a small minority in any age or community. And the harm they have dome to mankind is infinitesimal when compared to the horrors - the bloodshed, the wars, the persecution, the famines, the enslavements, the wholesale destruction - perpetrated by mankind’s governments. Potentially, a government is the most dangerous threat to man’s rights - When unlimited and unrestricted by individual rights, a government is men’s deadliest enemy.
Before her perceptive words were written, French philosopher Pierre Joseph Proudhon addressed the "people versus government" problem:
To be Governed is to be watched, inspected, spied upon, directed, law-driven, numbered, regulated, enrolled, indoctrinated, preached at, controlled, checked, estimated, valued, censured, commanded, by creatures who have neither the right nor the wisdom nor the virtue to do so. To be Governed is to be at every operation, at every transaction noted, registered, counted, taxed, stamped, measured, numbered, assessed, licensed, authorized, admonished, prevented, forbidden, reformed, corrected, punished. It is, under pretext of public utility, and in the name of the general interest, to be placed under contribution, drilled, fleeced, exploited, monopolized, extorted from, squeezed, hoaxed, robbed; then, at the slightest resistance, the first word of complaint, to be repressed, fined, vilified, harassed, hunted down, abused, clubbed, disarmed, bound, choked, imprisoned, judged, condemned, shot, deported, sacrificed, sold, betrayed; and to crown all, mocked, ridiculed, derided, outraged, dishonored. That is government; that is its justice; that is its morality - (General Idea of the Revolution in the Nineteenth Century)
Victorian philosopher Herbert Spencer pondered whether man requires governments at all:
What, then, do they (Humans) want a government for? Not to regulate commerce; not to educate the people; not to teach religion; not to administer charity; not to make roads and railways; but simply to defend the natural rights of man - to protect person and property - to prevent the aggressions of the powerful upon the weak - in a word, to administer justice. This is the natural, the original, office of a government. It was not intended to do less: it ought not to be allowed to do more - (The Man Versus the State)
He also wrote:
The great political superstition of the past was the divine right of kings. The great political superstition of the present is the divine right of parliaments.
Father of the Anarchist movement, Mikhail Bakunin - who spent many years imprisoned in dungeons - knew all about government oppression. For him governments were unnecessary institutions that darkened the world:
The liberty of man consists solely in this, that he obeys the laws of nature, because he has himself recognized them as such, and not because they have been imposed upon him externally by any foreign will whatsoever, human or divine, collective or individual - (God and the State, 1882)
German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche understood why governments exist, and how they maintain their malignant dominion:
...a fullness of state power such as only despotism had enjoyed...surpassed all the past because it strove for the formal annihilation of the individual...Once the earth is brought under all-embracing economic control, then mankind will find it has been reduced to machinery in its service, as a monstrous clockwork system of ever smaller, more finely adjusted wheels.
Spanish philosopher Jose Ortega Y Gasset explained State corruption in these words:
This is the gravest danger that today threatens civilization: State intervention, the absorption of all spontaneous social effort by the State, that is to say, of spontaneous historical action, which in the long-run sustains, nourishes and impels human destinies.
His sentiments were shared by the American critic Henry L. Menken, who said the Federal State:
...has spread out its powers until they penetrate to every act of the citizen, however secret, it has begun to throw around its operations the high dignity and impeccability of a State religion, its agents become a separate and superior caste, with authority to bind and loose...But it still remains, as it was in the beginning, the common enemy of all well-disposed industrious and decent men.
In his important book on State totalitarianism, Our Enemy: the State, Albert Jay Nock explained the motives of State officials:
It is unfortunately none too well understood that, just as the State has no money of its own, so it has no power of its own. All power it has is what society gives it, plus what it confiscates from time to time on one pretext or another; there is no other source from which State power can be drawn. Therefore every assumption of State power, whether by gift or seizure, leaves society with so much less power; there is never, nor can be, any strengthening of State power without a corresponding and roughly equivalent depletion of social power.
Nock understands that there is not a jot of difference between American Federalists and the diabolical Socialists who have plagued the world. He put the matter plainly:
The superficial distinctions of Fascism, Bolshevism, Hitlerism, are the concern of journalists and publicists, the serious student sees in them only one root-idea of a complete conversion of social power to State power...The positive testimony of history is that the State invariably had its origin in conquest and confiscation. No known State known to history originated in any other manner.
Freedom can go to hell, but apparently silly belief systems and fanatical prejudices are welcome to stay.
The men who profited from the Constitution's acceptance, expertly used fear to further their interests and to goad delegates into compliance with their will. They manipulated the fact that Americans were traumatized and exhausted by war. They stage-managed the Conventions and controlled media reportage of events in Virginia and Philadelphia.

If the people had the time to relax and educate themselves, if they had paid attention to the warnings of Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry, and the other critics who suspected what the conspirators were planning, the Constitution would never have been ratified.   
The best the people belatedly received was the Bill of Rights drafted in 1791. It was expressly created to protect people against potential abuses of the ill-received Constitution. It was conceded to the American people by Madison, who by then had secured all that he and his Federalist colleagues demanded.   
A number of states had accepted the Constitution with urgent recommendations for changes. At first, it seemed that Congress would pay no attention to these suggestions. Patrick Henry and other then set up a clamor which had to be heeded, and Congress referred the proposals to a committee - Nevins and Commanger (Pocket History of the U.S.)

The federalists delayed ratification of the Bill of Rights for over two years while they organized the new federal courts and armed the judges with powers to counter individual rights - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)
The Federalists instigated virtual panic, and made sure the people were not able to take time to repair and think. Their representatives and delegates were harried into accepting and signing the Constitution. The same methods of "conflict control" have been used throughout the generations. They are still being put to good use by politicians and parties. In the 1960s, Ex-Communist Jerry Kirk discovered how the great game is played. He eloquently explained the process in these words:
The idea is to create a situation where the people are so frightened of the chaos all around them, that they will throw their arms up in the air and shout “Federal Government, do something!” And the only choice open will be Martial Law…The Communists, black militants and revolutionaries will never succeed in overthrowing the government of the United States, but unless they are stopped, they will scare the American people into accepting Socialism from Washington, and status rule from the Establishment. This is what it is really all about.
Expert on the British takeover of America, G. Edward Griffin, explains the mechanics of conflict-control in these words:
…deliberately create problems, and then offer only those solutions which result in the expansion of government. Create conditions so frightful at home and abroad that the abandonment of personal liberties and national sovereignty will appear as a reasonable price for a return to domestic tranquility and world peace - (The Capitalist Conspiracy)
Student Socialist agitator James S. Kunen also discovered how the upper echelon conspires to foment social unrest, so the true enemies of freedom remain undetected:
In the evening we went up to the University to check out a strategy meeting. A kid was giving a report on the SDS Convention. He said the Convention men from Business International Round Tables...tried to buy up a few radicals...These men are the world's leading industrialists and they convene to decide how our lives are going to go. These are the guys who wrote the Alliance for Progress. They are the left wing of the ruling class...They offered to finance our demonstrations in Chicago (l968). We were offered Esso (Rockefeller) money. They want us to make a lot of radical commotion so they can look more in the center as they move to the left - (The Strawberry Statement: Notes of a College Revolutionary)
The scrapping of the US Constitution is essential. Americans must revise and update the Articles of Confederation and abolish the corrupt totalitarian Federal apparatus of control. Americans must wake up from their delirium and find out what kind of conspiracy has been occurring in their land. They must contemplate the words of Bertrand de Jouvenal, who said "A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves," and remember that it was mutineers and not conformists who founded America.

The traitors are still with us. Indeed their treachery is greater than ever. Hiding behind the Constitution and political process they see to it America's ports are sold and that schools are swamped and under-funded. Because of their scandalous policies America's heavy industry operates at a minimum. American businesses are throttled by legality and taxation, while foreign-made products fill the shelves. Companies and jobs are perpetually outsourced, prisons supersize and innocent men and women languish behind bars to be raped and tortured. Poisons fall from the sky in the form of chemtrails, and illegal aliens occupy like invading armies, enjoying the "fruits" they did nothing to cultivate or harvest. It all occurs in a country that came out of World War II richer than it went in.

Why is this the case? What has happened? Why have so few taken so much from so many for so long?
As of 2000, USA Today reports on its front page that 6.6 million adults (three percent of the adult population) are in prison or “correction.” No other society as ever done so deadly a thing to its people and on such a scale - Gore Vidal (Imperial America)

We have two million people in jail. Our country doesn't build hospitals, doesn't build schools and doesn't build day-care centers. It builds prisons. This is not the hallmark of a free society, but of a police state - Steven Hager (High Times Editor-in-Chief)
Oriental countries prosper and rise economically. The Third World is fast becoming the First World, while the First World nose-dives into ruin. This was the plan from the outset. It is the result of tyranny not democracy. It is also the result of apathy. No truer words on the subject were stated than those by President Abraham Lincoln:
These United States of America can never be destroyed from forces outside its borders. If America falls, it will fall from within. Brought down by apathy. When good people do nothing, Anarchy reigns - (Letter to Congress, 1854)
Lincoln also emphasized the despotism of wealthy oligarchs who prosper from the ignorance and apathy of the masses.
The money power preys upon the nation in times of peace and conspires against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than a monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy.
Robert Maynard Hutchins also commented on the apathetic state brought on by over-stimulation and trauma:
The death of democracy is not likely to be an assassination from ambush. It will be a slow extinction from apathy, indifference, and undernourishment.
Senator from Nevada, George W. Malone, made the following statement before Congress in 1957:
I believe that if the people of this nation fully understood what Congress has done to them over the last 49 years, they would move on Washington; they would not wait for an election...It adds up to a preconceived plan to destroy the economic and social independence of the United States!
Ironically, during and after the War of Independence the eyes of the world were on America. The Czar of Russia, Nicholas Romanov II, admired what he saw taking place and, before his brutal assassination, was ready to emulate the scintillating American experiment. During the War of Independence he sent ships, money and troops to assist American rebels. Russia and many other countries would have changed for the better had Americans not been cajoled into adopting the Constitution.
The good news is that even the most oppressive tyranny cannot last forever. Once the tyrant and his heinous industry is exposed, the game is up. At that point they can be overthrown, and things can be put aright. It has happened in Ireland and the Congo, in Cuba and Nicaragua, and many other lands. But the enemy knows this only too well. He understands that he is vulnerable, and is aware of how he could be undermined. As a result, he is constantly on guard. He knows that his activities and methods must not be properly scrutinized. Consequently, he makes a point of keeping his subjects in fear for their lives. He prefers them to be limbic creatures unable to reason and discern good from bad and right from wrong. He makes sure their attention is focused elsewhere, and that strange, demented, and frightening "enemies" are always rattling the gates. Through his obedient agents, he funds and controls the supposed enemies, and instructs them how to operate.

In this manner is the great game of geopolitics and mass control played. It is simply chess on a global level. Should a pawn fall off the board or be sacrificed, the kings, queens and bishops do not turn a hair. The comfortably placed misleaders bang the drums of war and send dedicated men and women to fight and die for the "United States" corporation.

The U.S. is a business, and those who have given their lives for it died uselessly. Tragically they have been sacrificed at the behest of their country's true enemies. As Count Leo Tolstoy wisely said "Government is an association of men who do violence to the rest of us."

George William Frederick (George III), King of Great Britain and Hanover. He was a member of the Hanover dynasty - the so-called House of Orange. Like numerous royals, he was a demented maniac who suffered from mental disease. According to author George Trevelyan, he vowed "never to acknowledge the independence of the Americans, and to punish their contumacy by the indefinite prolongation of a war which promised to be eternal." He wanted to "keep the rebels harassed, anxious and poor, until the day when, by a natural and inevitable process, discontent and disappointment were converted into penitence and remorse."

Military men are dumb, stupid animals, to be used as pawns for foreign policy - Henry Kissinger (January-February 2003 edition of Eagle Newsletter)

It's not a number I’m terribly interested in - Colin Powell (reply when asked about the Iraqi casualties)

The men who committed this atrocity in New York, on September Eleventh 2001, mass murdered more people than the combined killings of every serial killer in the 228 year history of the United States - Anthony J. Hilder (The Greatest Lie Ever Sold)

President Andrew Jackson suffered terribly at under the British Crown. During the war he and his brother were captured, held prisoner and nearly starved to death. When Andrew refused to clean the boots of a Red Coat, he was slashed with a sword which left him with scars on his head and left hand. His brother Robert died from smallpox contracted while a captive. Jackson's immediate family died from wartime hardships. As a result of these horrific experiences Jackson never forgave the British oppressors.

Our point is simple. We insist that the predators and parasites who have vampirized America and the world must be closely studied. Understanding how and why they function as they do provides us with the keys of worldly salvation.

Moreover, we must understand that the elite despots of the world are creatures of habit. The enjoy repetition and their nefarious strategies are tried and true. Additionally, we must understand that these demagogues bank on one human weakness, forgetfulness. Historical amnesia hands them the power they covet. As Milan Kundera so appropriately said: "The struggle of man against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting."

The answer to humankind's future lies in remembering what has transpired in history. It lies in not repeating past mistakes, and not falling for the same tired political fallacies. Furthermore, we must end our psychological dependence on the fiends who have established despotic forms of government and who benefit from our allegiance. As long as we consciously or unconsciously identify with the predator, we will never see the demise of tyranny, regardless of the political action taken. It will raise its ugly head time after time. Ultimately we must judge our misleaders by their deeds rather than their words.

We must be on guard against their rhetoric and sophistry, and not hesitate to use existing laws to prevent them doing their worst. We must not be afraid to seek justice when degenerate, self-serving politicians - supposedly acting in our name - seek to lead us astray.
Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is that numbers of people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions have been killed because of this obedience...Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war, and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem - Howard Zinn

Americans don't care about politics, only about politicians - Anthony Wedgwood Benn
The Articles of Confederation worked to bring security to all Americans. They restored order after the chaos of the War of Independence. Unlike the US Constitution, the Articles of Confederation honored the rights of individual States.

The Articles did not distinguish between rich and poor. They were meant for Citizens, not "People," and did not permit an oligarchy to assume totalitarian control. The men who drafted and ratified the US Constitution were hungry for power over human beings. They adamantly wanted to protect their own prestige and wealth. Despite their megalomania they knew what they wanted and how to go about getting it. They acted like proverbial wolves in sheep's clothing.

Their Constitution is deceptive in form and substance. It allowed an aristocracy to preside in America. The American-based aristocrats may not wear crowns or sit upon thrones, but they are in many cases directly related or connected to royal dynasties of Britain and Europe.
George W. Bush is for example a distant cousin of John Kerry, the presidential nominee who ran against him in 2004. Kerry's parents are not Irish but Jewish. On the matter of his aristocratic ancestry we read:
Senator John Kerry has blue blood from all the royal houses of Europe, with even more titled relations than President Bush…Burke’s Peerage, which researches the genealogy, said the Democratic presidential candidate traces descent through his mother, Rosemary Forbes, to the royal houses of Albania, England, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Russia, Byzantium, Persia (Iran) and France. Forbes was descended from William Forbes, the Laird of Newe, and extended family that included many baronets…It is via this family that the Democratic candidate is descended from Henry II, the king of England and father of Richard the Lionheart, who was the leader of the third Crusade in 1189…By contrast, Bush is related to Queen Elizabeth II, twenty British dukes and many European princes…President Bush, Princess Diana and Winston Churchill are distantly related - (Union Jack Newspaper; September 2000 Edition)
George H. W. Bush and wife Barbara are related to the same British oligarchs. Additionally, George is:

...closely related to every European monarch on and off the throne – and has kinship with every member of Britain’s royal family, the House of Windsor. He is the 13th cousin of Britain’s Queen Mother, and of her daughter Queen Elizabeth, and is the 13th cousin once removed of the heir to the throne, Prince Charles. Bush’s family tree can be documented as far back as the early 15th century. He has a direct descent from Henry III and from Henry VIII’s sister Mary Tudor who was also the wife of Louis XI of France. He is also descended from Charles II of England - David Icke (Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster)

Father George and wife Barbara are both descendants of Godfroi de Bouillon who, in 1099, led European noblemen in the successful Crusade to recapture Jerusalem from the Islamic faith and moved into the King’s palace at Temple Mount…Godfroi de Bouillon was the first king of Jerusalem and the Duke of Lower Lorraine, a major region for the Illuminati bloodline - ibid
The time has come for the veils of mystique to be torn away from the so-called "Fathers" of the Constitution. They were not champions of a free, sovereign nation, and their legacy is neither auspicious nor grand. They chose to subvert the Articles that guaranteed freedom to every American. They coveted power and made themselves fabulously rich by exploiting the gullibility and ignorance of the moral but illiterate, masses. In our time their villainous counterparts in government have shifted into overdrive. Their heinous acts of conquest, extortion and confiscation know no bounds. As long as ignorance of the enemy's nature persists, nothing will change, and the pirates of Capitol Hill will continue to ply their insidious trade. As King George once demanded, the war against America was to be waged eternally. His desire is being fulfilled as every day passes. Unless the Machiavellian intrigues of his biological and ideological descendants are exposed and overcome, America's ruin is certain. The task is, however, impossible without knowledge of the adversary. Knowledge is the weapon we must use to eradicate the imperious predators that lurk behind the long grass. of history.
“Conspiracy!” One of the darkest words in the language of man. Yet there is hardly a single page of History that does not partially reveal the deadly eye of Conspiracy at work. It was a conspiracy that lead Brutus against Caesar in the Roman senate on the Ides of March...that plotted the betrayal of West Point by Benedict Arnold, during the American Revolution…that led John Wilkes Booth to the assassination of President Lincoln on Good Friday 1865. The past record of man is burdened with accounts of assassinations, secret combines, palace plots and betrayals in war. But in spite of this clear record, an amazing number of people have begun to scoff at the possibility of conspiracy at work today. They dismiss such an idea merely as a conspiratorial view - G. Edward Griffin (The Capitalist Conspiracy)
Knowledge of the enemy is the golden key that opens the gate to a future free of tyranny and slavery. We not only owe our children a freer future - we owe it to our forebears. Those who fought and labored to create the elements of civilization we enjoy, but who were treacherously undermined and robbed, must be remembered and reverently toasted. It is their memory we honor, not that of their destroyers.
Where other men have skimmed the surface, Beard has gone through to the core. He stayed months in Washington to get to the core. In his search for ancient papers and documents in the Treasury Department, he went into vaults that were so filled with dust that it was necessary to excavate the papers with a vacuum cleaner. But when he came back to the surface he had damning evidence against a good many of the "patriot fathers." He then knew why they were so anxious, not only for a new constitution, but for the particular kind of a constitution that was afterward adopted - Allan L. Benson (The Dishonest Constitution)
Primary References
The Declatory Act
Society of the Cincinnati
The Constitution That Never Was

The Articles of Confederation
The Articles of Confederation
The Articles of Confederation

George Washington Exposed
Masonic Presidents

American War of Independence
Declaration of Independence
The United States Constitution
The Philadelphia Convention
United States Bill of Rights
Aaron Burr
Federalist Party
Alien and Sedition Acts
Benjamin Franklin: Mason and Jew
Benjamin Franklin
Patrick Henry
Thomas Paine
Thomas Jefferson
William Paterson
Abraham Yates
Samuel Adams
Andrew Jackson
James Madison
Alexander Hamilton
Robert Morris
Nicholas Biddle
Benedict Arnold
Albert Gallatin
Second Bank of the United States
First Bank of the United States
The Federal Reserve Banks
Bank of Manhattan
History of Money
Gouverneur Morris
Jewish Merchant Bankers
Haym Soloman
The Rothschilds
Rothschilds & their Awards
Jews in the Bush Administration
History of the Jews in England
Menasseh Ben Israel
Israel Jacobson
The Hofjuden (Palace Jews)
The Hofjuden (Palace Jews)
James Wilson
Richard Lawrence
The Whiskey Rebellion
Shay's Rebellion
Tontine Capitalism
Baron de Montesquieu
John Locke
The Hellfire Club
Philolexian Society
King George III
King William I (of the Netherlands)
House of Wettin
Saxe-Coburg-Gotha dynasty 1
Saxe-Coburg-Gotha dynasy 2
The Hesse-Kassel dynasty 1
The Hesse-Kassel dynasty 2
House of Hanover
House of Windsor
Duchy of Brunswick-Lüneburg
The State of Hesse
The State of Thuringia
Society General of Belgium
Direct Representation
Additional References
Recommended Reading (Selected List):
Dope Inc - L. Larouche, W. Tarpley (& Co)
Treason in America - Anton Chaitkin
The Quartet - Joseph J. Ellis
Hamilton's Curse - Thomas DiLorenzo
The Syndicate - Nicholas Hagger
The Secret History of the West - Nicolas Hagger
The Secret Founding of America - NIcholas Hagger
The Empire of the City - E. C. Knuth
Hologram of Liberty - Kenneth. W. Royce
Our Enemy: the State - Albert Jay Nock
An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution - Charles A. Beard
The Constitution That Never Was - Ralph Boryszewski
The Federalist Papers - Douglas Adair
Secret Societies of America's Elite - Steven Stora
The Secret Terrorists - Bill Hughes
The Enemy Unmasked - Bill Hughes
The Real Lincoln - Thomas DiLorenzo
Blacklisted by History - M. Stanton Evans
The Ruling Elite - Deanna Springola
America's Secret Establishment - Anthony Sutton
Trilaterals Over America - Anthony Sutton
The Creature from Jekyll Island - G. Edward Griffin
The Capitalist Conspiracy - G. Edward Griffin
The World Order - Eustace Mullins
Secrets of the Federal Reserve - Eustace Mullins
Tragedy and Hope - Dr. Carroll Quigley
The Anglo-American Establishment - Dr. Carroll Quigley
Bloodlines of the Illuminati - Fritz Springmeier
Our Invisible Government - Myron Fagan
CFR Unmasked - Myron Fagan
The Illuminati - Myron Fagan
The Invisible Government - Dan Smoot
The Unseen Hand - Ralph Epperson
Conspirator's Hierarchy: The Committee of 300
- J. Coleman
The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations - John Coleman
Diplomacy By Deception - John Coleman
None Dare Call It Treason - John Stormer
The Rockefeller File - Sen. Gary Allen
None Dare Call It Conspiracy - Sen. Gary Allen
Kissinger: The Secret Side of the Secretary of State - Sen. Gary Allen
In the Beginning: Story of the International Trade Cartel - R. K. Hoskins
The True History of the Bilderberg Group - Daniel Estulin
Secret Societies & Subversive Movements - Nesta Webster
The French Revolution - Nesta Webster
World Revolution - Nesta Webster
Illuminsim - Nesta Webster
Occult Theocracy - Edith Star Mille (Lady Queensborough)
Architects of Deception - Juri Lina
Under the Sign of the Scorpion - Juri Lina
My Awakening - David Duke
Controversy of Zion - Douglas Reed
The Power of Israel in the United States - James Petras
War is a Racket - Gen. Smedley D. Butler
Death by Government - R. J. Rummell
Fifty Years in the Church of Rome - Father Chiniquy
The Secret History of the Jesuits - Edmund Paris
Vatican Billions - Avro Manhattan
The Vatican Moscow Washington Alliance - Avro Manhattan
Catholic Imperialism & World Freedom - Avro Manhattan
The Vatican Holocaust - Avro Manhattan
Vatican Assassins - Eric Jon Phelps

 Click here for more legal empowerment vids and sources
     Click here for additional threads on Empire of Death, War on You, Important Teachers, etc

Tuesday, January 2, 2018

Utah man finds a 4-year-old alone in the snow after her mother died

Marcus King was on his way to play basketball when he heard a little girl's voice coming from a playground nearby. King told Fox13 in Salt Lake City, he was shocked to see her out in the cold without shoes or a jacket.

"She didn’t have any jacket, no shoes, no parental supervision, and just took action then and took her inside,” King said.

King took her into a community center and called police. It took nearly three hours to find where the little girl lived, and when police got there, the door was standing open and the girl's mother was found dead.

Lt. Tim Scott of the Ogden Police told Fox13, "Officers went inside and found a 41-year-old mother dead. She was living alone with her mother. There is no sign of foul play. There are some pre-existing medical conditions that may have played a role."

Police say the mother had been dead for about 24 hours. The Division of Child and Family Services are taking care of the child while they contact her relatives.
King told Fox13 he was glad to have found the child. He said, "This is not a good part of Ogden -there's a lot of weirdos around here, and I'm really, really fortunate and happy that I got to her, and nobody else did."

US weather latest: Cold snap expected to last as 90% of country fails to make it above freezing

The United States is ushering in 2018 with a cold snap so severe it nearly froze Niagara Falls – and it isn’t expected to warm up soon.

On New Years Day, 90 per cent of the country failed to make it above freezing, according to CNN. Temperatures reached lower than 10 degrees Fahrenheit (-12C) at the famous Times Square ball drop in New York. The city's weather is only supposed to get worse from there, with highs of 14(-10C) and 10 and a low of 2(-17C) degrees on Friday and Saturday.

The situation is not much better in the rest of the country. Even in the southern US, where temperatures are usually higher, some areas reached lows of minus 6(-21C) with wind chill. In the Southeast, meanwhile, temperatures are expected to stay 10 to 15 degrees colder than usual for the rest of the week.

Temperatures were expected to increase slightly over the weekend – before another, less brutal cold snap hit on Monday, according to weather service meteorologist Greg Gallina.

The National Weather Service (NWS) issued a wind chill warning from Texas all the way up to Canada, with wind chill warnings in states like Indianapolis and Missouri. More than 100 million people from Canada to Mexico were under wind chill warnings and advisories on Tuesday.

China Cut Tax Rate To 0% To Counter American Recovery And Pedophile Move...

Corporate UNITED STATES Report: Global Warming Driving Chocolate To Extinction By 2050

Climate change will force chocolate-producing plants into extinction by 2050, according to a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association report.

The NOAA report claims that changing temperatures around the world will making growing cacao plants nearly impossible within the next thirty years.
“More than 90 percent of the global cocoa crop is produced by smallholders on subsistence farms with unimproved planting material,” British researcher Doug Hawkins said.

Cacao plants only grow in specific regions within 20 degrees of the equator, mostly in rainforests and areas with high humidity and rich soil.

The NOAA claims climate change will negatively impact these areas by making them less humid, in turn making it more difficult for the cocoa crop to thrive.
The agency says gene editing is the key to saving chocolate by producing cacao plants more resilient to less suitable conditions.

“One adaptation strategy could be providing cacao growers with selectively bred seeds that have superior drought resistance,” says the report. “Another strategy involves a traditional cacao cultivation method that takes advantage of the conditions under which cacao naturally grows.”

Climate change alarmism has been used to justify government intervention before.
For example, the National Science Foundation spent $3 million on a study seeking to find ways to make Americans eat less and use less energy over global warming fears.

“Changes in household-level actions in the U.S. have the potential to reduce rates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate change by reducing consumption of food, energy and water (FEW),” according to the grant for the study.

“This project will identify potential interventions for reducing household FEW consumption, test options in participating households in two communities, and collect data to develop new environmental impact models.”

Additionally, European governments in the UK and France have already announced phase-out plans for diesel and petrol vehicles within the coming decades to combat climate change.

“Our aim is for new petrol and diesel cars and vans to be phased out in Scotland by 2032 – the end of the period covered by our new climate change plan and eight years ahead of the target set by the UK government,” first minister Nicola Sturgeon said last May.

California lawmakers are also keen on banning gasoline-fueled vehicles on a similar timeline.

“If you had told me five years ago that we might have autonomous vehicles on the road soon, I would have laughed,” said Assemblyman Phil Ting. “The technology is moving so quickly, I don’t know if by 2040 we’ll be owning our own cars.”

And California’s governor Jerry Brown says you need to be “put in the ground” if you don’t agree.

The globalists hope “clean” self-driving cars will become the primary method of transportation, because its a social engineering tool that will phase out vehicle ownership and put the movements of society into the hands of government controllers.

The Morning after the New Years Party at the Zoo

The Morning after theNew Years Party at the Zoo


‘We Are in Your Home’: ‘ISIS Terrorist’ Poses For Chilling Selfie in Front of New York’s Met Museum

Also comes amid ISIS calls for bomb and knife attacks over the holidays

A man wearing an ISIS face scarf has uploaded a chilling selfie outside New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art with the caption: ‘We are in your home.’
The image, uploaded to a pro-ISIS channel on messaging app Telegram on December 30, shows the man standing on a snowy 5th Avenue as people walk past.
It comes after ISIS issued a video featuring shots of New York while calling for more bomb and knife attacks across the festive period.
The poster that accompanies the chilling call to arms shows an ISIS soldier holding a knife with the words ‘It’s cheaper than a chainsaw’.
Read More

YouTube is a Sewer Pipe of Total Degeneracy

Helps video of idiot celebrity laughing at suicide victim go viral




Deletes Jordan Peterson video in which he defends himself against racism charges.
Helps video in which Logan Paul laughs at a dead suicide victim go viral.
Total degeneracy.

California Welcome Sign

Anna is right, and You Can't Eat Gold and Silver, but read this!

Who is Paul Stramer
By Paul Stramer

Anna's last article is right on target. We need a complete overhaul of the entire monetary system of the whole world, and we need it yesterday.  Lot's of people are in real trouble with their finances. The kind of trouble that puts people out on the street homeless.

Most of the time, the best way to predict the future is to go back into the past, and see what worked back then, and upgrade those ideas, methods and tools with the newest technology and the newest tools we have today.

For over 5000 years Gold and Silver have done something that nothing else has been able to do, and that is HOLD THEIR BUYING POWER.  Stamp that on your forehead. It's not just because people believe they will hold their purchasing power. Both have intrinsic value in industry, silver more than gold.

In 1913 you could walk into a fine clothing store in downtown New York City and with just one $20 Gold piece, you could buy a brand new suit, a new tie, and a fine pair of shoes.

Right now today, over 100 years later, you can walk into a good clothing store, and for the same one ounce of Gold, you can get a fine new suit, a new tie, and a fine pair of new shoes, and perhaps a great hat.

The only thing that has changed is the value of the paper currency ratio with Gold.

Why is that?  You can't eat Gold and Silver, but people value it far more highly than paper. They always have for over 5000 years.  Paper currency can be made for about 3 cents per bill, and today it's only digits on someone's computer, probably the bank's computer where it was entered from nothing or someone's signature, as a credit. Every fiat paper currency has gone to ZERO and all the while gold and silver have maintained their buying power.  So if you consider a 5000 year history temporary, then what would you replace gold and silver with.

Silver is still the lawful currency of the United States. The silver Eagle still has $1 stamped on it.
I don't see that changing very soon. Even if it does, one ounce of silver, regardless of what is stamped on it, still has some intrinsic value. Industry uses silver by the boatload, in relays, electronic devices like computers and phones, in medicine and many other uses.  That is why the above ground supply of silver is far less than gold right now.  Really, if the prices of these two metals were not so manipulated by the cabal, and if supply and demand were the yardstick, the prices would be reversed.

So regardless of the ideal valuation of labor exchanged for money, it is what it is at this point.

The point is WHO ASSIGNS THE VALUE.  If it's government, watch out. If it's the open market, then we have a chance to correct all this.  Unfortunately right now it's the banking cabal in cahoots with all the criminals in governments. The only thing that can solve all of that is for all of us to stop participating in their fraud fiat currencies, and start using lawful money. Silver is lawful money.

So until we can get all that sorted out, what do you trust more, paper or silver?  I will take the metals any day. Not because I think that is the ideal way to trade. Barter is still at the top of my list for tough times, but until we get the real changes we want, I will take silver and stash it for a rainy day, far quicker than most anything else including digital currencies like Bitcoin.  They are all a means to and end, and that is to trade for what we really need to sustain life. Things like food, water, dry goods, shelter, transportation, energy, etc.

So considering all of the above, I have lead quite a few of you to the Mint Builder company, and I want to give you a progress report to start the new year.

If you don't know what I am writing about follow this link. 

Since November 3rd, when I found out about this new company, we have brought in 525 members.
Many of those have brought in members as well, so that we have 680 members to start the new year within our downline.  We intend to make that thousands of members this year.  Why?

Because the benefits are real gold and silver, or cash, or Bitcoin, YOUR choice, when you get paid.

Because we are bringing all the newest tech of the Internet to bear on the 5000 year history of precious metals and using it to grow your wealth. We want to grow the wealth of the ordinary people who know the truth, and who read the truth.

In the first two months we have generated $2000 in commissions. We have purchased advertising for Anna's website, and this blog to the tune of $651.20 and have sent Anna $250 and when the final cycle comes in later this week will send another $187.50 to Anna.  That will leave 911.50 for our work here in Montana for the two months. I am glad I have a little income from my business to make up the difference and some donations from you all.  I would like to get Mint Builder built up so I never have to ask anyone for a donation ever again, but we aren't there yet.

So this is working so far, and I have sent Anna a letter  outlining what this is. If you want to know more visit the website at and if you are a member already we have lots of training to send your way, so make sure you are subscribed to our Mint Builder training system by filling out the form here:  If you are already subscribed the system will tell you that.

Thanks and make it a very Prosperous and Happy New Year.

Paul Stramer

Trump Invites Supporters on Surprise Mar-a-Lago Tour

‘Deplorables’ treated to once-in-a-lifetime visit of Winter White House


Several Trump supporters got to meet the president Saturday after his motorcade passed them on the way to Mar-a-Lago.

The 16 members of “The Trump Squad” were surprised when 20 minutes later two white vans returned to pick them up with an offer to meet Trump at his Winter White House in Palm Beach.

“It stunned me,” Florida resident Mike Sims told the Palm Beach Post. “I didn’t know what to think.”

The flag-waving backers boarded the vans and were whisked away to the president’s private country club.

Following a Secret Service screening, they met with the president for 90 minutes, shaking his hand and taking photos with him.

The group was expectedly joyful to meet the most powerful man in the world.
“It was such an honor — a day to all us deplorables we will never forget,” Donald Tarca noted. “We the people do matter.”

“He couldn’t have been more down to earth,” another Trump Squad member, Mary Tulko, told The Post. “He was just really nice.”

The meet-and-greet culminated in a partial tour of the resort, including a visit to Trump’s living room and a look at Marine One.

Afterwards, guests were escorted to the ballroom where they had “meatballs, watermelon, pigs in a blanket, spring rolls, thick chocolate chip cookies, iced tea and water,” the Post reports.

The group routinely meets at the Southern Boulevard bridge to hail the president’s arrival and was previously invited to Mar-a-Lago in March.

Why Neither Gold Nor Silver Hold Any Answers

By Anna Von Reitz

For the last several months people have been wanting to argue over the pros and cons of silver versus gold standards to base monetary values on and so far as that goes, silver is the obvious choice.  It's our traditional form of money and it is the least subject to manipulation.  I have said that from Day One when the whole issue of precious metals-backed forms of money came up, and I still say so. 

However, as I attempted to make clear in my discussion about The Goat Standard, nearly anything that has actual value can serve as a standard for exchange: a sin, a female goat, and $200 have the same value in the current system of things, and it doesn't much matter how you cut it. 

The ridiculousness of the whole concept should be apparent given that example, but judging from some of the responses I've gotten, there are still those who just don't get the joke.  

They know that the present monetary system is bogus and can cite chapter and verse for why it is bogus.  The "secret" of the Federal Reserve is now well-known: check kiting is what the rest of us call it.  And insurance is revealed to be nothing but legalized gambling.  In fact, the entirety of the banking industry is now known to be a criminal enterprise aimed at theft of various kinds, fraud of various kinds, and enslavement of various kinds. 

So--- now you think that "going back to the gold and/or silver standard" is the answer?

Think again. 

First, there is vastly more gold already mined than the rats are admitting.  Tons of it.  Miles of tunnels filled with it.  Huge, vast, mindless quantities of gold.  You haven't seen it, but I have. 

Second, there are now means to extract endless additional quantities of gold from common materials.  Gold can be extracted from sand, from crushed glass, from sea water--- you name it, and gold can be extracted from it.  There is an endless supply of gold available now, just as there is an endless supply of paper money.  And again, you haven't seen that, but I have.

The rats in charge are all ready to spring this new twist on gold and have you buying in at over a thousand dollars per ounce.  They will try to make you believe that gold is very scarce and valuable.  They won't tell you how much of it they already have stored up.  They won't reveal how easily they can extract more on demand.  This is all designed to make you think that gold has value because it is supposedly rare and in finite supply, when its not.

It's just a slightly different version of the same old schtick.  And, the same kinds of processes can be applied to producing silver.  So there is no long term cure to be had from precious metals.  Or from paper.  Or from goats.

The take home point is that we need to totally rethink the concept of money and the way we symbolize value and what we value. 

When we value external things, we make ourselves slaves of those things.  We have all seen this, we have all been victimized by it, and yet hardly anyone seems able or willing to look it squarely in the face.  We have been living as slaves to pieces of paper and numbers in bank ledgers.  Will we now live as slaves to little pieces of metal and more numbers in bank ledgers?  Ah......duh?

The essence of idolatry is that you take something in the external world and raise it up to be a god over you, whether it is a coin, a piece of paper, a goat,  a religious relic or a dictator.  It hardly matters what form the idol takes.

Somehow, we have to grow beyond this infantile condition of self-enslavement and delusion, this kink in our logic circuits.  In order to do that, we must become aware of the problem and of the truth. 

The problem is that we very easily lose track of the difference between the symbol of value and the value itself.  The truth is that until we can come to a more sane and mature basis of symbolizing value, we will be prey to criminals who operate as middlemen controlling the perceived value of these symbols and limiting our access to them.

How many here want to spend the rest of your days bowing and scraping to criminals?  Doing their bidding because they control the supply of "genuine" pieces of paper or pieces of metal, either one?

This is why I have said for a long time that we need to have a world standard coinage or currency or both, which is based on the value of all natural resources, all commodities in trade, and all labor on Earth.  This is the only way to have "honest" money that is immune to hoarding and speculation and manipulation. 

Imagine what would happen if we made goats the standard of value?  Everyone would suddenly be raising goats and turning out goats as fast as possible, and as the market became saturated with the "value" of goats, the price of goats would go down.
It's the same with any commodity you can name including gold and silver. 

The only answer that avoids all of this craziness is the answer I have given you--- base the value of your money on all goods and all services (labor) worldwide.  Then the only way for such money to gain value is for us to take better care of the Earth and better care of ourselves and the plants and animals that share the Earth with us.  Such money ceases to be an idol and an end unto itself, and becomes a motivation for good. 

And that is what we sorely need on this planet--- motivation to do what is right and good.

See this article and over 800 others on Anna's website here:


Part 1




Just because it is not announced on CNN doesn't mean that this is not happening!

Monday, January 1, 2018

Color Code the Judges

By Anna Von Reitz

I have served as a "Justice" for the Alaska State Superior Court and as a "Judge" for the Postal District Court, so I have some basis in practical knowledge of what courts are and what the jurisdictions are and how things are supposed to work----and don't. 

Technically, all land jurisdiction judges are called "Justices" as in "Justice of the Peace" and as "Supreme Court Justice".  

All sea jurisdiction judges are called "Judge" or "Magistrate".  

In the weird world of privatized corporate government the judicial system is as messed up as any other, and it rapidly gets difficult to tell who is acting in what capacity and in what jurisdiction.  There is also a nasty practice of overlapping and deliberately operating multiple jurisdictions at once in the same courtroom that needs to stop. 

So how about this suggestion?  

Require the justices to wear green robes --- dark green for the Postal District Court serving the international land jurisdiction, and medium green for the County and State Superior and Supreme Courts.  Green adequately symbolizes the land jurisdiction, so that courts set aside to serve the living people can be readily and surely identified and operated without any questions. 

Require the judges to wear blue robes --- dark blue with gold braid for martial courts, dark blue without braid for Admiralty courts, and light blue for Maritime court officials.  The gold braid is an adequate symbol of military authority and the dark blue and light blue both adequately symbolize sea/water jurisdictions.  

Adopting such conventions would put an end to confusion and provide an explicit external sign of the jurisdiction and nature of the court.  It will also prevent judges from usurping into or pretending to serve other jurisdictions, so that people can instantly identify the presumptions under which they are being addressed.  

See this article and over 800 others on Anna's website here:

The REAL Scandal of the Hammond and Bundy Trials....

By Anna Von Reitz

The REAL Scandal of the Bundy and Hammond Trials.....

Everyone is missing the point. These corporations are self-interested. Both the BLM, Inc. and the FBI, Inc. are owned and operated by the same parent corporation, dba, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT (INC.) They are all private for-profit entities in the business of providing "governmental services". They are in business for themselves.

So if BLM sees an opportunity to steal some prime land or a good mineral claim or a chance to steal water or grazing rights for re-sale, etc., etc., to sweeten its own pot, of course it is going to run to its sibling company, the FBI, to assist and to defend its theft and over-reach.

The FBI hasn't ever been acting as a dispassionate third party law enforcement agency in these matters. It has been called in to assist its sister company.

Both are federal subcontractors owned and operated by the same parent company, so of course the FBI is going to be supremely prejudiced in favor of the BLM.

This is what happens when you "privatize" public functions and don't even tell people what you did.

Everyone including a lot of the judges and lawyers assume that the BLM and FBI are legitimate disinterested government agencies, when in fact they are private, for-profit subcontractors with their own axes to grind and their own prejudicial relationships.

The real scandal is that both the FBI and the BLM are controlled by the same parent corporation and directed by the same Board of Directors with nobody being the wiser. Any appearance that the FBI has been disinterested in its actions and prosecutions needs to be debunked.

And the names of the Board of Directors and the corporate officers in charge of the so-called UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT (INC.) need to be published so that everyone can see and understand who is really behind all this nastiness, because the same group of cretins have been directing the actions of both the BLM and the FBI from the beginning.

Now, who would be surprised, if Harry Reid and/or his sons or cousins or BFFs or stockholders in his enterprises were on the Board or serving as officers of the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, INC.? Who would be surprised if some major land developers and government contractors show up on the list? People who stand to gain if the Bundys lose their ranch? People who gain some kind of advantage from prosecuting the Hammonds?

We need some good Private Investigators and Auditors to blow this scandal wide open and bring forward the evidence that the FBI acted in self-interested collusion with the BLM and that both these "agencies" were compromised and acting in self-interest under the direction of their parent corporation--- which has sat anonymously in the background, never being recognized for its role and exactly what it is and exactly who runs it.

There's a reason, folks, that the BLM and FBI and the Prosecutors didn't do their jobs for the Public Good and didn't disclose vital information to the Defense in these trials --- and the reason is simple: they are under contract to provide us with Good Faith service, but they are owned and operated by self-interested private parties intent on making profits and garnering advantages for themselves.

If anyone wants to take on the research job, contact me privately 

To Major General Kenneth A. Nava and Donald J. Trump

By Anna Von Reitz

President Donald J. Trump
c/o The White House

Major General Kenneth A. Nava, Adjutant General
District Commander
New Mexico National Guard/Dept. of Military Affairs

We have a problem here in Otero County, New Mexico. Local police have detained and charged a man named Steven Duane Curry, age 64, a native of Colorado, with forty felony counts addressed to Stephen Duane Curry, age 58, a native of New Mexico, and the idiot local authorities--- all steamed up thinking that they made a Big Arrest--- won't admit their mistake.

Steven Curry, an innocent by-stander who is under the protection of the Federal Whistle-blower codes, was arrested by these lunk heads September 17. He was unarmed and offered no resistance while six deputies beat him unconscious. They have left him, a civilian non-combatant, without needed medical care and assistance for three months.

Steven Curry corrected his political status records in 2014, retiring from any obligation as a "federal citizen" and returned to his birthright status. Your office, General Nava, is responsible for maintaining accurate records and more generally speaking, the District Commander is responsible for supervising the courts and their deputies.

This is a clear-cut case of mistaken identity and false arrest and brutal mistreatment of a civilian. The Public Defender was notified of these facts and also given Notice of Liability.
There is one other odd twist--- both Steven Curry and Stephen Curry are Federal Whistle-blowers and should be under federal protection.

Steven Curry is a Junior Woodchuck geologist who blew the whistle on a scam in Colorado wherein common rocks were being sold as meteorites.

Stephen Curry has blown the whistle on 911 and on Uranium One, and is active in several major exposes of criminal activity.

Steven Curry is rotting in the Otero County Detention Center, when he should be fully protected as a civilian and as a Federal Whistle-blower in favor of the Federal Government.
Stephen Curry has also brought forward information vital to the National Security.

NEITHER of these men deserve the mistreatment that Steven Curry has suffered at the hands of the local New Mexican police.

I am asking your office to get on the stick and straighten this mess out.

Anna Maria Riezinger