Buried evidence proves fighter escort shoot down of MH17/370

The Dutch web site Anderweltonline managed to get a great photo of the actual part of the plane attacked, and it proves the fighter jet escorts shot Mh17/370 down.

They released a very clear photo in PDF form, which I have ripped to Jpeg and linked HERE. This opens 4,000 pixels wide, make sure you view it full size for the details you need to see that indeed, the cockpit was shot at from both sides and then destroyed with a tank killing round.

Short explanation for now: If this was a missile shoot down:

1. The cockpit would not have fragmented and landed far from the crash, because missiles target the center mass which would be far enough away from the cockpit to not significantly damage it.

2. All shrapnel punctures would be inward.
3. The cockpit would have likely remained intact.
What happened here? There was crossfire targeting only the cockpit, the cockpit of the plane was shot at from both sides which caused punctures both inward and outward as proven by this piece of the aircraft. This 100 percent proves the fighter jets did it, and at least one explosive round was used which blew the cockpit apart. The large body panel sections were blown off the aircraft when the 550 plus MPH wind of flight rammed itself straight into the gaping hole where the cockpit was, which badly overpressured the aircraft. That is why there are so many big pieces scattered across a distance. The plane would coast down to the ground with no smoke trail if only the front of the plane was targeted and explode on impact. THIS IS THE SCENARIO THAT ANSWERS ALL QUESTIONS and it is proven true by just looking at this wreckage piece.

Click the picture below, though it appears large it is nothing compared to the original which will come in if you click for it, and it is important because it is so clear it provides absolute proof this cockpit was in fact shot at with regular guns.

I was going to spend the morning translating the article on Anderwelt to Dutch, but when I hit that web site this morning, they had an English translation there already. For extra perspective, read it there

Excerpt:

"The facts speak clear and loud and are beyond the realm of speculation: The cockpit shows traces of shelling! You can see the entry and exit holes. The edge of a portion of the holes is bent inwards. These are the smaller holes, round and clean, showing the entry points most likeley that of a 30 millimeter caliber projectile. The edge of the other, the larger and slightly frayed exit holes showing shreds of metal pointing produced by the same caliber projectiles. Moreover, it is evident that at these exit holes of the outer layer of the double aluminum reinforced structure are shredded or bent – outwardly! Furthermore, minor cuts can be seen, all bent outward, which indicate that shrapnel had forcefully exited through the outer skin from the inside of the cockpit. The open rivets are are also bent outward.

In sifting through the available images one thing stands out: All wreckage of the sections behind the cockpit are largely intact, except for the fact that only fragments of the aircraft remained . Only the cockpit part shows these peculiar marks of destruction. This leaves the examiner with an important clue. This aircraft was not hit by a missile in the central portion."

And now my analysis:

IF you were going to load dead bodies and dead pilots or no pilots onto an aircraft and dead fly it, and then do a false flag with it, the best rational method would be to destroy the cockpit, and there is a very good reason for this, which is:

The cockpit is the strongest part of the aircraft, and often remains intact after a crash. If you were going to false flag a plane down, you would not want an intact and empty cockpit, or an intact cockpit with pilots that had been "dead for days and smelling of decay" would you? Targeting the cockpit would be key to keeping a lid on a remote controlled flight that had no pilot interaction at all.
The fact the cockpit only was targeted once again confirms flight 370, because even if it was a 777 with a body identical to MH17, 15 years of technology advancement would make the cockpit very different and THAT could not be permitted to show up in any wreckage photos. Better to blow it completely to smithereens. To ensure this, they used fighter jets to do the job rather than take a random chance of a missile leaving obvious evidence that could end up on Youtube.

And if they were not playing filthy with all of this, WHY BOTHER WITH A MISSILE STORY? Why say center mass was targeted, and produce cute graphics of a center hit? The public would have accepted targeting of the cockpit bringing the plane down, why would the perpetrators HAVE TO spawn a lie about a missile?

Summary of inconsistencies from the beginning of all this:

1. The bodies were rotting and dead for days on DAY ONE, no one living boarded the shot down plane.

2. The cockpit was targeted, had entry and exit holes proving guns took the plane down and a lie about a BUK missile was spawned, WHY?
3. In all original photos, the flag on the plane matched flight 370, yet the photos were all subsequently hacked to put all flags on all Malaysia airlines planes in exactly the same position. After this, subsequent photo hacks were done to show all kinds of different versions of the same wreckage pieces, issued directly from Mainstream news sources which allowed cross comparison to prove tampering and hard proof the mainstream media was muddying the waters, and I would like to ask WHY? Why not just show us the wreckage AS IT WAS?
4. Initially the mainstream media reported 108 aids researchers were on the plane "according to the boarding log" and then that same media was forced to redact that and reduce the number to six, which is another lie because IF A BOARDING LOG REALLY EXISTED, THE ORIGINAL 108 AIDS DOCTORS STORY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN REDACTED. Fact? ZERO aids doctors boarded the shot down plane already dead for days and smelling of rot.
5. The shoot down corresponded with the ground assault on Gaza within a provable time frame of 10 minutes, and probably to the exact minute. This would be lottery style luck if Israel did not order the shoot down or have the Mossad set it all up to get double use out of the shoot down by having it distract the news from dirty business elsewhere.
6. The flight was 200 KM off course and over a war zone for the first time EVER. Modern avionics do not allow for such errors, even late 70's avionics would not. HOW DID THAT ERROR HAPPEN other than willful intent and WHY? Well, the frame up of Russia for all of this right when Russia was making a big push for the BRICS alliance that threatened the dollar's reserve status might give you a clue, a huge war on Russia would certainly cause problems for that.
7. Flight 370 had to be gotten rid of, and people disposed of, and it looks like the perpetrators of the shoot down wanted NO WITNESSES so they made sure EVERYONE was smelling of rot to make good and sure they were dead and would not survive any crash and then speak about what happened to flight 370.
8. Media glitches proved this was a psy op being prepared days in advance, which is why an RC showed up in the wheel well of the plane "to show people what it looked like if it crashed" when MH17 had an RD and flight 370 had an RO. And the D on MH17 had a perfectly flat back, the C is a dead giveaway, this was in the works for at least a week and probably longer, RC had not flown for a week and was still on the ground in Malaysia after this shoot down. How did a picture of it supposedly being boarded by a "crash victim" end up in the news?
9. Route MH17 stayed PERFECTLY ON SCHEDULE after this shoot down, yet route 370 was canceled for weeks. How could this be, if flight MH17 really lost an aircraft to an unexpected situation? This difference in behavior is fairly easy to explain: Malaysia airlines was ambushed by the theft of flight 370, but probably went along with the story about the shoot down of MH17 under threat of blackmail, and since all questions were already answered they had no reason to cancel the normal schedule for route MH17.

Ebola outbreak getting spooky

Obviously I think it is intentional, and that this new variant is genetically modified. Whatever the story on this is, if it does end up going on a global rampage you should not go to any authorities for help, because though at the local level they are probably well meaning, the main control at the top is evil and we all know about agenda 21.

lots of people are giving advice about how to treat ebola, and it is mostly pure B.S.

FIRST AND FOREMOST, colloidal silver has ZERO effect on viruses. Colloidal silver is for bacteria. Bacteria have metabolic processes that are interfered with by colloidal silver, which blocks the ability of bacteria to take up oxygen. That is how colloidal silver works. But viruses have no metabolic processes that colloidal silver will affect, they are technically not even alive and are more like machines which deliver commands to cells to produce more viruses until the cells die from overexertion from producing viruses.

The active component of Noni stops many viruses

But do not just run out to buy Noni juice, there are a zillion Noni scams out there and an easy way to get around them - Pineapple. Pineapple contains the same active ingredient found in Noni, at 1/10th the concentration. Since most Noni providers tell you to take it an ounce at a time, you can either go with an ounce of Noni juice or just drink 10 ounces of pineapple juice. The Noni component survives canning, pasteurizing, and all other processing for pineapple.

Though there are obviously no studies about how effective Noni or Pineapple will be against ebola, it is a LOT BETTER CHANCE than colloidal silver, which will give you NO CHANCE. And obviously adding vitiamin C to the mix helps against any virus. Though different viruses act differently to various dietary habits (feed a flu and starve a cold) there is not much information regarding Ebola about this,

And I must state that I am not any sort of expert with Ebola, but I certainly know what I would try and WHO I WOULD AVOID. The disease itself could easily be in the shot claimed to be protection from it.