PHOENIX — A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction Monday
blocking Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Maricopa County Attorney
Bill Montgomery from enforcing two state laws that make it a felony for undocumented immigrants to use stolen identities to obtain work.
The
injunction essentially prevents Arpaio from continuing to conduct his
controversial worksite raids to arrest undocumented workers and
Montgomery from prosecuting them.
However, Arpaio had already
announced in December that he planned to disband his worksite unit at
the end of January or in early February once they completed an ongoing
investigation.
Since 2008, the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
has conducted more than 80 worksite raids, which have resulted in the
arrests of more than 700 undocumented workers.
The
workers typically agreed to plead guilty to felony charges after being
held behind bars for weeks under another state law that made
undocumented immigrants charged with serious crimes ineligible to be
released on bond. That law also has been thrown out in federal court.
Many
of the arrested immigrants were turned over to federal immigration
officials and deported. Their felony convictions virtually destroyed any
chance of ever being able to return to the U.S. legally.
In
Monday's ruling, U.S. District Court Judge David Campbell said that the
two state laws that criminalize the act of identify theft for the
purpose of obtaining employment are likely unconstitutional because they
are pre-empted by federal law.
"We are thrilled that the ruling
recognizes that the Maricopa County sheriff and Maricopa County attorney
are not above the law," said Jessica Bansal, litigation director for
the National Day Labor Organizing Network, one of several groups that
filed a federal lawsuit challenging the ID theft laws.
"And we are
very happy that the court has recognized the harm the raids were
causing to the migrant community and offers them some protection" until
the case is concluded, Bansal said.
In a statement, Montgomery
said "today's ruling underscores yet again the consequences of federal
inaction and the Obama Administration's indifference to the effects of
unlawful immigration practices. While pretending to address the concerns
of people admittedly violating the law, the victims of identity theft
are deprived of the State of Arizona's protection."
He said his office is reviewing an appeal of the preliminary injunction
Attorneys
representing immigrant-rights group Puente, the American Civil
Liberties Union and several other plaintiffs filed the motion for a
preliminary injunction shortly after filing a class-action lawsuit in
June, which seeks to eliminate the last legal footing Arpaio has to
conduct his own brand of immigration enforcement using workplace raids.
The
motion sought to preclude the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and
County Attorney's Office from enforcing two state provisions in
identity-theft laws that critics say are intended to target undocumented
immigrants.
The two state laws in question, "taking identity of
another person or entity" and "aggravated taking identity of another
person or entity," were frequently cited as the legal backing behind
Arpaio's workplace raids.
The suit alleges that the statutes,
while purporting to enforce all varieties of identity theft, are thinly
veiled mechanisms used to promote a broader, anti-immigration agenda.
Arpaio defended his practices and said that his investigations target identity thieves regardless of their immigration status.
But
last month, Arpaio voluntarily disbanded the controversial criminal
employment unit — a decision that plaintiffs hailed as a direct result
of the lawsuit.
Earlier, Arpaio's office said the sheriff will disband the unit in early 2015 after "careful consideration" with command staff.
"The
grant money issued to his office from the state of Arizona will be
returned to the state, and the deputies assigned to the unit will be
reassigned to other duties," the statement said. "Sheriff Arpaio
stresses that ID theft and ID fraud remain criminal offenses under
Arizona Revised Statutes. Deputies and detectives will continue to
investigate these crimes."
Contributing: Michael Kiefer, The Arizona Republic.
Monday, January 5, 2015
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
This so called judgey wudgey is not even a real judge he is a corporation employee and has no authority for doing any thing outside of D.C......and further more the corporate charter is caput.....send him to the end of the food stamp line....IT IS TIME FOR ARPAIO TO KICK THE AHOS OUT.....JOE NEEDS TO LEARN WHAT THE HELL POWER HE HAS AS SHERIFF......AND FURTHER.....FURTHER MORE THE STUPID.AHO JUDGE IS UNEMPLOYED....
To me, (my opinion), he has an unusual way of pointing up one finger.
I was watching the photo and put up a finger and realized I had to modify my action to position my thumb in an unnatural way (unless I was doing sign language for the letter b, but still when I was teaching myself the letters, I still didn't hold my hand like that.
States rights, which should nearly always usurp federal powers, seem to have few advocates, and even fewer with the balls to tell the Feds to eat shit. This country resembles a garden with and increasing number of invasive gophers. At some point, no carrots or cabbage will remain for anyone to take. TYJM frj
Post a Comment