ATHEISTS PUSH (AGAIN) TO REMOVE "IN GOD WE TRUST" FROM NATION'S CURRENCY - THIS TIME WILL THEY GET THEIR WISH?!
A group of atheists wants the courts to declare the phrase "In God We Trust" unconstitutional and removed from our nation’s currency. These atheists are the secular version of the Islamic State who go about destroying anything related to competing religions, and atheism is a religion. “Satellite images confirm that the oldest Christian monastery in Iraq has been destroyed by the jihadist group Islamic State (IS).”
The group of 41 plaintiffs is led by Sacramento attorney Michael Newdow who is no stranger to suing the government over issues related to religion. They filed a federal lawsuit in Akron, Ohio, “arguing the expression violates the separation of church and state.”
"The phrase 'In God We Trust' was made the official U.S. motto in 1956, one year after the phrase 'under God' was incorporated into the Pledge of Allegiance." (H/T: CrisisBoom)
Let’s get some preliminaries out of the way. First, this is not a “church/state” issue. The church is not involved, and even if it were involved there is no constitutional provision that mandates that it can’t be involved.
Second, the First Amendment forbids Congress from establishing a religion or prohibiting the free exercise of religion. Declaring that the nation trusts in God is not an establishment of religion. It’s an acknowledgment that God is the ultimate sovereign. If God is not the ultimate sovereign, then who or what is? The State?
Third, the existence and acknowledgment of God protects atheists because it stops the State from becoming a law unto itself. If that happens, there is nothing to stop the State from becoming a tyrant and enforcing its own mandates on everyone regardless of creed or lack thereof. While the Bible declares an atheist to be a “fool,” there is no negative civil sanction imposed on atheists.
Do we have any proof that the founders espoused a view of “nonreligion” as Justice Scalia described what Europe has adopted? Look how that’s working out that Islam will soon be the majority religion that will wipe out all dissenters.
Fourth, there is a large body of evidence that our founders – even the most skeptical – did not adopt a “nonreligion” worldview:
- On September 25, 1789, the day that Congress approved the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, Congress resolved to direct a committee to “wait upon the President to request that he recommend to the people a day of public thanksgiving and prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many and signal favors of All Mighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a constitutional government for their safety and happiness.” Washington issued the proclamation on October 3, 1789.
- A paid chaplain system was instituted by Congress in 1789. The first Congress declared that “two Chaplains of different denominations . . . shall interchange weekly.” The House chose William Lynn, a Presbyterian minister from Philadelphia, as its first chaplain, and the Senate picked Samuel Provoost, Episcopal bishop from New York. The chaplain system is still in effect.
- Constitutional scholar and Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story (1779-1845) wrote the following in his Commentaries on the Constitution: “[T]he real object of the [First] amendment was not to countenance, much less to advance Mahometanism [Islam], or Judaism, or infidelity by prostrating Christianity; but to exclude all rivalry among Christian sects [denominations] and to prevent any national ecclesiastical establishment which should give to a hierarchy the exclusive patronage of the national government.”
America trusts its own version of god, and in most cases it’s the State. Even people who believe in God have become willing wards of the State: “Where your treasure is, there your heart will be also” (Matt. 6:21.)
The majority of Americans prefer free stuff from the State, money that has been stolen from some citizens and given to others.
Recently, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled 4-3 supporting the “firing of an Ohio science teacher for insubordination because he refused to remove ‘religious materials’ from his classroom, including posters of President George Bush and Colin Powell praying” even though the Constitution states that it was drafted “in the Year of our Lord” 1787. Is the Constitution unconstitutional?
How does the Ohio Supreme Court decision square with the Congressional Prayer Room’s stained glass window that shows George Washington kneeling in prayer? “Surrounding him are the words from Psalm 16:1, ‘Preserve me, O God, for in thee do I put my trust.’ Above him are the words from Lincoln’s Gettysburg address: ‘This Nation Under God.’”
Not only are we not a nation under God’s favor, but we are a nation that has made it a point to disavow the religious past that made America great. We’re doing this to our own peril. “Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap” (Gal. 6:7).
http://godfatherpolitics.com/28031/atheists-push-again-to-remove-in-god-we-trust-from-nations-currency/
15 comments:
THIS GARBAGE ATHEISM HAS GEORGE SEROS MOVEMENT ALL OVER.
I'd bet that a lot of these 'atheists' are really muslims or jews wanting to destroy the Christian values this coutnry was founded on. They, and past and present WH and Congress, are pissing on the graves of all our fathers and uncles and brother and fore-fathers and all the women who fought and died for this country's principles. They need to be outed and sent back to their own countries.
SAVE OUR TROOPS - BRING THEM HOME!!
In God We Trust is good. Just don't make it In Christianity or any other "Religion" we trust!
they could have shit on stick on the fiat currency we will write what we want on the real money
No, no, NO!!!!
They have NO power. Many counties are now using treasury dollars. Toss the aethiests back into Babylon immediately.
Honestly I just don't give zhit, if there, or Not. I know is all a farce.
Why do people get all bent out of shape over a title.. God is a title .. there are many gods mentioned so which god is it that In God We Trust is really referring to ? The money God maybe? I would think that our creator would have a name and that name would not be God .. as I said God is a title and it could mean any number of God's .. is it God the money , God the government , God of the evil .. Don't we first need to find out what God that refers too before getting all bent out of shape over it?
Does it matter.
I make this opinion, protected form of speech.
Do your own research. I'm no predictor of the times, nor a orator of facts.
The face of the man on the bill, would that be the God they trust?
The dead president?
In what religion would an all powerful, omnipotent being/deity/esoteric entity care what 'It' is called, and worry whether that one word that people want to call it, is on some pieces of paper that have no value what so ever!
What people should pay attention to, is they are getting your focus on fiat.
There are people who supposedly have freed us from this paradigm, and those that locked us into the paradigm need to get us back.
They owe us for the theft of our credit and property, and forcing us to use their paper currency of no value.
They are smarter.
They have made it public their paper has no value.
They have made it public they owe us money for what they have stolen from us.
They will offer all of you payment at the same time, of their worthless currency.
Since you know it's worthless, once you accept it, you have received final settlement, and who knows, may be reentered back into their paradigm of debt slavery.
But to top it off, when they do this issuance, They are hinting at it all the time, the words helicopter money, that's giving it to everyone at the same time.
When you accept it, and most of you will, they have also by the Baltic Dry Index, reduced the amount of things you can use it on.
So while you 'think' you are rich, with the purported free money they gave you, and we all know no one gives you something for nothing....people will cash and spend.
Cashing it is final settlement for all the shite they did to you.
And as all that money chase a few items, the price of the items will increase.
Then you will have your inflation, and everything you buy will be overpriced cheap shi[f]t. Then they will raise interest rates, and have locked most of you back into their slavery system, because you'll scream you are part of the republic and free, and you will have accepted the deal from the devil himself without even thinking of the consequences of the action.
There is never full disclosure.
There wasn't for entering social security.
There wasn't for entering into IRS 1040.
And there won't be for accepting the helicopter money that is coming your way.
As you watch everyone else purchase the things you want, will you be out there with them too?
Will all the work of Judge Anna, and the OPPT, and Neil Keenan, and white dragons, and all these other people who have done things, will all their actions be in vain?
Giving that money will be equiv to the devil offering the son of the high one, the offer to jump from the mountain and all the kingdoms he see will be his.
Stupid offer, all the kingdoms already belonged to him, no need to jump to prove he can claim them.
All that belongs to us, is not offered by men who own nothing.
We may find that those that case, have no access to the gold that is supposed to be returned to us, because they accepted final settlement from the helicopter fiat, that will be sent to everyone for 'free'.
I'm just bringing to light what most have not even thought of, as we point fingers at each other and get angry that a few words are not on a worthless piece of paper.
Would God be trustworthy to put his name on an IOU?
Why even argue about it, is all I'm saying. It's a form of lack of knowledge that is a waste of time.
Does the Federal Reserve even own the rights to say God trusts their worthless piece of paper, that costs them less than 6 cents to print, no matter what number they put on the obverse and reverse of the bill.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_one-dollar_bill
Helicopter money anyone!
This is a Christian nation. If you do not like that step on over the border.
Anyone else notice how the letter s is only correct when it's at the end of the sentence, all the others are replaced with an f.
Why is Thursday and sincere allowed to have the letter s, when by all purposes, all words in that document have f to replace s when it's not at the end of the word, and it's not a capital letter.
Also notice how George is not a corporation, he makes sure everyone knows by indicating he has hand.
Given under my hand. -- he makes sure he's not corporatized back then.
Also, when sheriffs deliver summonses, I've seen one before.
It specifically states
Delivered by my hand, or delivered this day by hand, or something with the word hand on it to remove the corporate faction of the body.
Corporate bodies do not have hands or feet.
Corporate bodies have a head, arms, and body but no hands and no feet.
Just noticing the distortion of the document as posted.
Exactly. The proper phrase for using the Fed's fiat money is "In Satan we trust." Why insult God by wanting a reference to him on the devil' currency?
The above commentators should be heeded carefully!!!!
Fools and their foolish trinkets are soon parted. If you accept the indebted slavery notes as a gift you will all soon be sucked back into Babylon and could lose everything....even your life itself!!!
Just as Niel Keenan even spoke on the radio...the republic is never coming back to dc. There was never any republic in dc to begin with.
It exists in the states where it belongs!! Do not be so vain that you don't notice the terms in of the contract, when they offer to contract with you. YOU are no longer docile, foolish, weak sheep.
Oregon is returning to the republic, the republic exists in the states only!! Stand tall, stand up for you!
Think about it - GOD is all 'religions' all 'faiths'. Just because someone called the Divine Source by another name, does not make "God" incorrect. We are all sons and daughter of God. Any religion which negates women over men, is false. All are equal. Science confirms that there was one original source ( tho they do not call it as most folks do.)
Spot on, 5:04 PM ! 'Christ' is an office, not a person / human. Mary Magdalene did not wash his feet, she ANOINTED him with a sacred unguent, crocodile fat as per tradition. Why would a god, a real god, need to be 'approved?' You god people are as jumpy as a cat in a hornet nest. Don't you have your faith ? Can't you focus on a real problem ? Don't we have separation of church & state ? In god we trust belongs in your church, not on a stinking piece of paper. Are you so insecure you have to rant and rave over a stupid piece of paper ? GROW UP ! It's a bill, not the Holy Grail! If the Vatican is the center of 'Christianity,' why not take your wasted energy & try to stop the rampant pedophilia in the priesthood ? There's a real cause, and unlikely that the lazy assed god people will bother with it, you might have to do something besides whining. fw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NiBU5sdTPE
In this video he says the Fed will give the money to us.
Then he says whether its a tax refund or check doesn't matter
then he says run not walk and buy anything you possibly can with it.
That's the last trick in their hat, and many will take that supposedly free money and walk right back into the system we are being freed from.
If you watch, when he speaks of gold or silver, the words :I think: pops up a lot, and that's similar to those interviews where people are selling stuff with unbelievable product performance and they seed their pitch with 'In my opinion' so smoothly, you don't even know the things he's sounding so absolute about are "just their opinion"
A lot of the gold pushers on these interviews pepper or salt their dialogue with I think or I believe and if you wrote down how many times they said it, you'd be surprised how you thought they were giving you hard facts, and they aren't. They are selling a product.
The plan is to give the money to the streets, according to the man in this interview after 8 minutes into it.
Post a Comment