Monday, January 11, 2016

Third Round with Karen Hudes



Third Round with Karen Hudes
in Three Parts
--- Judge Anna


January 10 2016

This document is of critical and international importance to the people of America!

I received this thread from Judge Anna this morning Jan. 10th 2016 with the following request.

Please see attached document.  It is in three parts so people can see the whole discussion. 

1. Part One of Third Round:  Karen would not answer straight questions and went running after a brief sparring match, so we just sent our Final Notice of Commercial Obligation Lien directly to her bosses. 

2. Part Two of Third Round: Karen replied to our Final Notice of Commercial Obligation Lien without actually replying--- just making several specious claims, to which we responded and also pointed out that she didn't answer the five points of our lien and if she doesn't it goes into effect as of January 17 as International Law. 

3. Part Three of Third Round:  Karen has been sending out a lot of gratuitous false claims and hate mail, so I took one and replied to it.  

Please help this information get out to as many people as humanly possible.  It clearly shows the way these rats misrepresent documents, identities, everything.  

Anna

The document is article # 130 at www.annavonreitz.com

130. Three part document on Karen Hudes by Judge Anna    http://annavonreitz.com/thirdround2.pdf

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

This Anna is only a judge in her own mind, and this blog needs to make that clear. She shows her ignorance by continuing to mix admiralty/maritime and corporate law. They are not the same. She has too ignorant to speak intelligently about law, much less judge it in any way. While I agree that Karen Hudes is nothing more than a cabal shill, the gobbledy gook this "judge" raves about should be totally ignored.

Anonymous said...

I agree. Neither "Judge" Anna nor Karen Hudes can be taken seriously.

Anonymous said...

The remarks of Anonymous 10:21 AM, are a good example of the brain dead who are stuck in cognitive dissonance. Judge Anna is indeed a judge in common law; which trumps (no pun intended) all other so called laws. The, so called, judges in admiralty/maritime are not judges at all; they are administrators of the bankruptcy of the UNITED STATES federal government, Inc. Corporate law is copyrighted (private) law which is used in conjunction with the UCC (Uniform Commercial Code) in admiralty/maritime tribunals (not courts) regarding matters of commerce; which includes virtually everything. So admiralty/maritime and corporate law are the same and are not, law they are an abrogation of law (color of law). Also all Federal, State, County, City, Municipal Courts are corporations just like the government corporations they support through revenue generation by fraud. As for Karen Hudes; she's an attorney (member of the BAR) enough said!

Anonymous said...

well stated, agree with you 100%.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous at 12:40. Please list all of "Judge" Anna's successes such as her "commercial liens" and similar stuff she supposedly files against various people or groups.

I doubt any of the people she rants about have ever heard of "Judge" Anna, much less given her as much as a nickel.

Anonymous said...

10:21 if is she was only a judge in her own mind then without question the federal government would have already arrested her for impersonating an officer of the court because she is a royal pain in the establishment's @$$. As for not taking her seriously like 12:21 said. You don't think you can take her seriously because if what she says is in fact accurate, your life, what you classify as reality has been a blatant lie. When forced to confront any truth, especially that if proven accurate will destroy a person's reality, the immediate reaction is to jump to denial and name calling. Just because it doesn't mesh with your perception of reality doesnt make her serious and credible.

Anonymous said...

Really? Who elected her or appointed her, other than her self anointing? There is no republic and no common law in effect or anyone to enforce it, so you can scream common law from the mountaintops, and see where it gets you. I don't have cognitive dissonance, I have actual knowledge of reality and law. You are the one with cognitive dissonance, but in your case it is better known as wishful thinking. I have proven here several times this maritime/admiralty is nonsense, and nobody has been able to show any difference. Until you come up with a valid argument showing I am wrong, it is you who is living in a fantasy land.

Anonymous said...

They don't care as long as she is not issuing orders as if she is a corporate administrative judge within their system. As I said before, nothing she has said or done has any backing or enforcement, so she has not made any progress with her nonsense. However, she needs to be very careful because they can come after her if they so choose, whether they are right or wrong. There is no court in existence today where true grievances can be heard. They are all kangaroo courts to be used as tools for the cabal when/if they so choose. So far, her rants are totally meaningless.

Anonymous said...

They are meaningless to you and a few others, to be exact. However now that all of Oregon is kicking the feds off the land acreage they have indeed had some significant legal impact.

Even if that means the federales never returns to Oregon after getting their butt kicked, that is a victory. It may have no force of law in any other courts, it may not mean anything until the brute force comes in and cracks down on the entire organization of d.c. corruption that's correct...

But it succeeded in Oregon for now. And it made more than history for now, because the full effect of those laws is now enforced in various states.

And that three turn circus rat Karen Hudes knows this which is why she's not attempting to send more foot soldiers in.....Why do you figure that slimy Hudes rat does on physical fighting and is all talk? She's caught, the entire BAR is behind her and there's no room.