Tuesday, March 4, 2014

RARE FILM FROM 1932

Subject: RARE FILM FROM 1932


You would like to think this couldn't happen again, but it could.  History, has a way of repeating itself.
How many of you were aware of the march on  Washington in 1932?
Would US troops attack its own people if ordered? You bet, see what they do to WW1 veterans, tanks tear gas, bayonets, fire.
An interesting slice of history that I wanted to share.
An eye opening Video, that few today, have ever seen. 


 http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?feature=player_embedded&v=sNOsIB5VMSQ 

U.S. Intelligence Adopts Russian Tactics

Tomorrow In Review Masthead
ARCHIVESCONTACTWHITELISTUNSUBSCRIBE
Tomorrow In ReviewMarch 4, 2014
 
U.S. Intelligence Adopts Russian Tactics
 
  • Big brother's tech of choice -- from the Sochi Olympics to your home team's stadium
  • Investing in the "security state" until the world regains its sanity
  • Ethical minefields on the path to social perdition… a company with 103% gains in the last 2 years (and growing)… and more!
Secrets of an Ex-IRS Hit Man Revealed

There’s one simple tax form that could put $2,600 in your pocket by April 15.

A form only three out of 100 taxpaying Americans file every year.

It’s so little-known your accountant probably doesn’t even know it exists.

You won’t believe how easy it is. And it’s all 100% legal.

TAKE A LOOK AT THIS
Byron King
Byron King
Dear Tomorrow in Review Reader,

Over six months ago, a highly placed member of the Russian government contacted a global military contractor called the Artec Group.

This company holds a small affiliate named Artec ID, a provider of cutting-edge biometric scanning equipment programmed with the latest identification software and database.

In an effort to better secure the border against known terrorists in advance of the Olympic Games, President Putin quietly had a new security system installed at Russia's Sochi International Airport. If you happened to stay in a hotel room in Sochi during the games, you went through it.

The entire airport is within the new system, which is comprised of at least 550 high-definition cameras, all pushing terabytes of biometric data into a central computer located in a command center staffed around-the-clock.

The computers in the system can identify passersby at a glance, using software that instantly scans your face and compares it with a global database. That, and it looks for suspicious body language and then immediately alerts security personnel of potential threats.

But what is biometric scanning technology? And what does it do, exactly?

You might know it another name: facial recognition technology, or FRT.

If you're unfamiliar with FRT, it's a system of cameras and other sensors that feed precise data about a person's physical characteristics — facial structure and, in more advanced systems, height, build, maybe even heart rate and body temperature — into a computer, which then cross-references those characteristics with known descriptions of criminals. Or in some cases, like in Sochi, those of known and suspected terrorists and their associates.

This futuristic face-scanning tech is also tied into a network of physical checkpoints that include fingerprint scanners and other electronic and biometric defenses. The whole system is designed to eliminate human error by automating more of the security work, leaving more personnel ready to respond. It's a marvel. And that's only what Artec ID has leaked about the system. Who knows what they haven't told us?
The Wildest Healthcare Story of 2014

Warning.

The beginning of this video may make you a bit uncomfortable. In fact, the first 51 words could make you visibly wince.

But it may be the strangest and most important healthcare story you will ever see.

Click here to see a device that may take care of a big chunk of your future healthcare… and maybe even make you wealthy at the same time.
From its humble beginnings decades ago, facial recognition technology has become increasingly fast and accurate. Today's FRT, which analyses facial structure from as many as 40,000 variables, can make a positive identification in under a minute with a high rate of accuracy.

Facial Recognition SoftwareOver the past decade in particular, developers have made great strides, allowing identification of people farther and farther from the camera, with greater accuracy and speed. In fact, systems currently under development are said to be able to identify people from behind and even flag a person of interest based on suspicious biometric readings.

And the Russians aren't the only ones working with this up-and-coming tech.

FRT systems have been tested in the U.S., mostly at major sporting events. The first known test was carried out on unknowing subjects nearly a decade ago at a major league football game. Over the course of the game, it identified 19 known ticket scalpers in a crowd numbering tens of thousands.

Again in September 2013, an FRT system was tested at a hockey game at the Toyota Center in Kennewick, Wash., to look for 20 volunteers dispersed among the crowd in the nearly 8,000-seat arena. Expect more of the same as U.S. intelligence agencies add more FRT to their arsenals.

As I mentioned above, the FRT system Russia's government installed at Sochi airport is a product of Artec installed by Elektronika LLC. It's called Broadway 3D, and it's said it can make a positive identification in under one second, even if a person is in motion or obscuring his face, say, with sunglasses or a hat. Designers even claim it can distinguish identical twins.

Clearly, Russia wasn't going to let a terror suspect get through if they could help it. Looks like they were successful, too.

Facial recognition technology, a product of military design, is becoming a staple in the civilian world too. There's a lot of upside to go. Expect to see (well, actually you won't see it, because it will be very well hidden) this technology cropping up in banks, stadiums — even on ordinary street corners across major cities! — in an effort to… umm… deter crime.

Who's against deterring crime, right?

The anti-terror applications of FRT are big. I wouldn't be surprised to see this kind of tech coming soon to airports across the world, as well as to government buildings, banks, corporate sites, critical infrastructure and more. Maybe even to gated communities, to keep those gates safe.
Obama's Sinister Plan to Grab Americans’ Retirement Accounts?

The IRS scandal. Benghazi. Obamacare.

What's next? Maybe your IRA, 401(k) and pension plan?

All could be in Obama's "cross hairs" in the next 12 months. Few know it, but there's a special “retirement plan” that Obama can't touch.

Go here for the details.
As a matter of fact, the company I'm going to share with you today just contracted to install a cutting-edge FRT system at Mecca, Saudi Arabia, where Muslims from around the world all hope to go on pilgrimage at least once in their lifetime. Gee, why would the Saudis want to scan faces of religious pilgrims? Need I say more?
Soldier Taking a PhotographWell, yes… I have more to say. FRT will find other ways into our world. It'll be everywhere — all the places you would expect and many places you'd not suspect — and that's why it'll be there, too.
I have to confess that this is very much "Big Brother," in my view. I'm not entirely comfortable with somebody somewhere having the ability to know when I turn every corner. Still, this is a trend that's happening because modern society is in a battle against terrorism across the world, wherever it raises its ugly head.
Societies everywhere are defaulting toward the so-called "security state." But at least you can invest in it and make some money, until the world starts regaining its sanity.
Now, consider that governments across the world are buying into FRT in a big way. Sure, it was a new and improved way of helping maintain security at the Olympics, to be sure. But FRT is also another form of state control over your life. We're walking into an ethical minefield, and it's as if no one can get away from the problem because this is exactly where tech is heading.
In other words, there's momentum behind FRT, and nobody is going to stop this train. A vast new marketplace is opening for FRT. Perhaps we're moving down the pathway to social perdition, as we can plainly see in developments — not too far from Sochi — in Ukraine.
Along the way, with all of these new developments, there's A LOT of incredible technology on display. Much like the other areas we cover in these pages, there's plenty of money to be made following this new wave of tech.
Regards,
Byron King
for Tomorrow in Review
PS The bad news is that Artec ID isn't investable here in the West. But I've found a very similar company for my readers, one that's seen a 103% gain in just the last two years. And I think there's more of that to come. See here:
Top Secret
 
Additional articles and commentary from 
Tomorrow In Review
 on:
TwitterTwitterFacebookFacebook
Agora Financial.comTo end your Tomorrow In Review e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent fromTomorrow In Reviewclick here to unsubscribe.

If you are you having trouble receiving your Tomorrow In Review subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by whitelisting Tomorrow In Review.

© 2014 Agora Financial, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. This newsletter may only be used pursuant to the subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the World Wide Web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Agora Financial, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. Nothing in this e-mail should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice.We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication o r 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Government agrees to ratify the agreement between Iraq and Kuwait and frank's comment

Government agrees to ratify the agreement between Iraq and Kuwait
03/04/2014
 
 

BAGHDAD / obelisk: Council of Ministers decided, on Tuesday, approved a draft law on ratification of an agreement between the Government of the Republic of Iraq and the Government of the State of Kuwait.

The council said in a press statement received "obelisk" a copy of which, "The Council of Ministers decided in its regular, today, approved a draft law on ratification of an agreement between the Government of the Republic of Iraq and the Government of the State of Kuwait for the encouragement and reciprocal protection of investments, signed on 16.12.2013 , and referred to the House of Representatives, according to the provisions of Articles (61 / item first) and (80 / item II) of the Constitution. "

The Council added that "The approval comes the sake of the Iraqi government on the ratification of the Convention and its Protocol, to encourage investment and provide protection contractual her between the two countries through the creation of better conditions for investments and investors from both countries, and to be a catalyst to push the initiatives of individual investment forward and increase the prosperity of both peoples."

He pointed out that "the subject had already been presented to the Council of Ministers' decisions (31) held on July 21, 2008 and issued a decision of the Council No. (268) for the year 2008, containing the delegation and Minister of Industry and Minerals authority to sign the draft agreement, assigning the State Council audit and review of the draft Convention and preparation The draft law on ratification of it, where the agreement was signed in Baghdad on December 4, 2010 during the visit of Minister of Foreign Affairs of Federal Republic of Germany to Iraq. "

He explained that "the Convention and its Protocol has a provision on the protection of investments and revenue and lack of confiscation or nationalization of those investments, either directly or indirectly, or make them vulnerable to the actions reward in its implications the process of expropriation or nationalization by the Contracting States, and may not impede or disrupt the management process maintenance or use or enjoyment of investments investors other Contracting State or dispose of them in their territories through arbitrary or discriminatory, as well as not permissible for them to subject investments or investors of the other Contracting State for the treatment of less differentiated than that accorded to investments or investors or local investments or investors of a third country " .

 
http://almasalah.com/ar/news/25792/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AD%D9%83%D9%88%D9%85%D8%A9-%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%81%D9%82-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%89-%D8%AA%D8%B5%D8%AF%D9%8A%D9%82-%D8%A7%D8%AA%D9%81%D8%A7%D9%82%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%86

Subject: Frank26 we are dangerously close to seeing the reate of the IQD go up in value   Today at 3:21 pm

3-4-2014 Intel Guru Frank26 [via Anonymous] “in his opinion” we are “dangerously close” to seeing the rate of the IQD go up in value! ...if all goes as evidence points, to article 8 compliance and approval from the IMF in the article 7 review this month, it looks like this is coming to an end. Russia and Ukraine is a separate issue and will NOT affect the RV...all we want is to see the bonds and the rate.

There are lots of meetings and lots of travel between Iraq and the US this week…Would they waste precious time and travel to talk about nothing of significance? ...they are talking about moving IQD to other banks and other countries, and that requires a new rate. Meetings to conclude at the end of this week, and we hope Iraq is to be congratulated on their compliance to article 8, and they are prepared for the IMF article review sometime between Mar.14th-17th!

INTEL RUMORS

FlPatriot59: March 4, 2014: Federal agencies in the Washington, DC, area are OPEN under 2 hours DELAYED ARRIVAL and employees have the OPTION FOR UNSCHEDULED LEAVE OR UNSCHEDULED TELEWORK. Employees should plan to arrive for work no more than 2 hours later than they would be expected to arrive. 

WILDDUCK : putin pulled his troops back to barracks this is a non issue, check the drop in the ruble and stock market and breathe . then spell out BRIC Brazil Russia india, China These countrys are bringing you the GCR. 

Gatorguy: The dates WRITTEN in ink for deadlines are March 7th (Budget) and March 14-17(WTO MEETING) Just relax and know that these dates are in INK 

Takenbythewind: I heard March 15-16th yesterday could be the RV from a banking contact. That meeting would add confirmation if that is the case, WTO.

GatorGuy:  Today (March 4th) was the ABSOLUTE earliest I was even looking at it happening.. 20% chance. The real deadline dates (Written in INK) are Friday March 7th and the 14-17th

PUTIN ORDERS RUSSIAN TROOPS AND MINISTRIES TO ATOMIC SHELTERS OVER NATO THREAT OF WAR

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

PUTIN ORDERS RUSSIAN TROOPS AND MINISTRIES TO ATOMIC SHELTERS OVER NATO THREAT OF WAR
Posted By: Seawitch [Send E-Mail]
Date: Tuesday, 4-Mar-2014 13:08:01

Putin Orders Russian Troops And Ministries To Atomic Shelters Over NATO Threat Of War
By: Sorcha Faal
A grim report prepared by the Ministry of Defense (MoD) circulating in the Kremlin today says that President Putin has ordered an abrupt end to the surprise military drills of Russian forces launched on 26 February to counter the West’s aggression in Ukraine and ordered them, along with key ministries, to report to their assigned atomic-proof bomb shelters as war fears with NATO are now approaching its deadliest level since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis.
According to this report, Putin was forced to take this action due to NATO’s “illegal” using of its provisions contained in Article 4 which was requested by Poland and which will be discussed in an emergency meeting of this Western military bloc later today.
NATO’s Article 4 explicitly states “The Parties will consult together whenever, in the opinion of any of them, the territorial integrity, political independence or security of any of the Parties is threatened,” and which, this report continues, does not include the Ukrainian crisis as it is neither a member or party to NATO and neither Poland, nor any other member of this military bloc is being threatened, in any manner whatsoever, by Russia.
NATO meetings under Article 4 are rare, this report says, with only Turkey having used the option before, calling for consultations three times, once during the 2003 war in Iraq and twice, two years ago, over the Syrian conflict.
Important to note, MoD experts in this report say, is that invocation of Article 4 is the prelude step to Article 5 which authorizes all NATO countries to prepare for war, which the Obama regime had attempted, but failed to achieve last year in the Syrian crisis when its own citizens, and those of it allies, revolted against a war that would have brought the West into direct conflict with Russia.
The current crisis in Ukraine, this report further explains, was an Obama regime engineered coup against its democratically elected constitutional government by nationalist fascist mob forces that was confirmed by US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland who publicly stated that key organizations in Ukraine including the neo-Nazi party Svoboda were generously supported by Washington. And to quote Nuland directly: “We have invested more than $5 billion to help Ukraine to achieve this and other goals.”
“Any doubts about the Obama administration’s real intentions in Ukraine,” writes New York University scholar Stephen F. Cohen, “should have been dispelled by the recently revealed taped conversation between a top State Department official, Victoria Nuland, and the US ambassador in Kiev. The media predictably focused on the source of the “leak” and on Nuland’s verbal “gaffe”—“##### the EU.” But the essential revelation was that high-level US officials were plotting to “midwife” a new, anti-Russian Ukrainian government by ousting or neutralizing its democratically elected president—that is, a coup.”
As to what the “other goals” of the Obama regime towards Russia are in their fomenting this latest Ukrainian crisis, this report continues, can be found in the sobering report recently prepared by top Putin Presidential advisor Academician Sergei Glazyev and retired General Leonid Ivashov of the highly influential Izborsk Club think tank which warned:
1. Washington, acting through its embassy and through high-ranking European figures, is behind all the opposition’s moves and the very phenomenon of the “Maidan.” The goal of this political “game,” over the past few years and particularly during the organization of the Maidan itself, is to transform Ukraine into an anti-Russian state. This cannot be viewed other than as civilizational aggression by the West, headed by the US, against Russia.
2. The US has some disagreements with the EU, especially with Germany regarding the future promotion to the top position of either Klitschko (the EU choice) or Yatsenyuk, who would then be replaced by Tymoshenko upon her release. At the same time, Washington views with contempt the efforts of Brussels and Berlin to play an independent role in Kiev. But their main goals coincide.
3. Washington is most worried of all that Moscow, which has enormous reserves among the Ukrainian population, will suddenly wake up and become more active, wrecking the almost completed plan of establishing a totally anti-Russian government, up to and including the broad use of the fascistized followers of Bandera.
4. The U.S. leadership group on top of Operation Ukraine is comprised of high-ranking intelligence and diplomatic operatives, who are skillfully pulling into these “actions” senior political leaders, including Congressmen from both parties, Vice-President Biden, and even President Obama. Thus we see a consolidated U.S. strategy, which will not change in any way whatsoever without active counteraction by Russia.
Even more grimly, this Izborsk Club report warns Putin, the “full scenario” being implemented by the Obama regime against Russia includes:
1. Rejection of the presence of the Russian Armed Forces in Crimea, including at Sevastopol as the base of the Russian Federation’s Black Sea Fleet. The time frame will be set at six to ten months, which is insufficient for an orderly relocation of the military facilities to Russian territory in the vicinity of Novorossiysk.
2. Purges of pro-Russian forces in eastern and southern Ukraine, leading to a flood of refugees into the Russian Federation.
3. Annihilation of manufacturing capacities that do contract work for the Russian military-industrial complex, in Kiev, Dnepropetrovsk, Kharkov, and other Ukrainian cities.
4. Stepped-up forcible Ukrainianization of the population on the left bank of the Dnieper.
5. Expanded partnership of Ukraine with NATO and the appearance of U.S. and NATO bases in Ukraine, including Crimea.
6. Establishment in eastern Ukraine of bases for training terrorists, who will begin to operate both in the Caucasus and in the Volga Basin, and possibly also Siberia.
7. Extension of “Euromaidan” techniques into major Russian cities, especially in ethnically defined constituent territories of the Russian Federation.
8. Expulsion of the Russian Orthodox Church from Ukraine, accompanied by forcible seizure of churches and monasteries, resulting in a further decline of the authority of both the ROC and the executive branch of government within Russian society.
9. Launching of prosecutions against Gazprom, Rosneft, and their executives, with the new Ukrainian government also suing Russia in Western-sponsored international courts under various pretexts.
This MoD report further notes that the strategies employ the United States considerable instruments of national power include measures to: 1) actively destabilize “elected” governments (Ukraine, Venezuela, etc.) through the use of NGO's, intelligence agencies and proxy groups; 2) prop up brutal regimes (Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Egypt) through a US congressionally approved program, executed by the US military, called Foreign Internal Defense; 3) information operations conducted via the printed press, social media, radio, television and film that seek to shape the cognitive local to global environment in favor of US national interests.; and 4) existentially destroy foreign governments through direct military action in conjunction with the weaponry of finance capitalism to create new markets.
To fully understand the Obama regimes criminality in regards to Ukraine, this MoD report says, can be seen in their installing as Ukraine’s acting President Oleksandr Turchynov, who aside from being one of the top henchmen of Semyon Mogilevich (described as The World’s Most Powerful Mobster That You Probably Never Heard Of and currently on the FBI’s 10 Most Wanted List), was the former head of the Ukrainian Secret Service (SBU), and the only time he garnered any votes was when he stood for Mayor of Kiev in 2008, and got less than 20 per cent of the vote.
As to how Turchynov was exactly “elected” by the Ukrainian Parliament as President, this report continues, was “beyond farce” as the only members allowed to vote were those of the far-right, Neo-Nazi and nationalist parties who were illegally allowed to vote for the overthrow of their legitimate government using the vote cards of the absent majority members kept out of chamber by mob violence and in violation of both Ukraine’s constitution and international law. [Note: The Party of Regions (ousted President Yanukovych’s Party) holds 134 seats. 117 are non-affiliated, many of these voting with the Party of regions; the Communists have 32 seats, often voting with the Party of Regions. On the other side is the Fatherland Party (Timoshenko) with 88 seats and UDAR (Klitschko) with 42, then the Freedom Party with 36.]
After the Obama regimes takeover of the Ukrainian government, this report says, the Neo-Nazi forces aligned with their new President Turchynov began a reign of terror against Russian speakers, Orthodox churches and their Jewish population, attacks so horrific they led one of Ukraine's chief rabbis, Moshe Reuven Asman, to urge Jews to leave the capital city Kiev and state: “I told my community to get out of the city and if possible out of the state... there are many warnings about planned attacks against Jewish institutions, and we have been told by the Israeli Embassy to not go outside.”
The flight of Russian speaking and Jewish Ukrainian’s from Ukraine into Russia, this report further notes, is nearing 1 million and is a situation the Border Guards are now calling a “humanitarian disaster.”
As to why the American people aren’t rising up against the Obama regime to prevent a NATO-Russia war, this report explains, is, perhaps, best summarized by the highly esteemed aforementioned American academic Cohen, and who wrote this week in his article titled Distorting Russia: How the American media misrepresent Putin, Sochi and Ukraine:
“The degradation of mainstream American press coverage of Russia, a country still vital to US national security, has been under way for many years. If the recent tsunami of shamefully unprofessional and politically inflammatory articles in leading newspapers and magazines—particularly about the Sochi Olympics, Ukraine and, unfailingly, President Vladimir Putin—is an indication, this media malpractice is now pervasive and the new norm.”
And, most shockingly, this MoD grimly notes that the reason the Obama regime wants this “new norm” with Russia can be found in the 1 March 2013 report of the Strategic Studies Quarterly, a journal published by the US Air Force's Air University, warning that “US strategic policy under the Obama Administration is seeking to create the capability to launch a first strike against Russia and/or China, without fear of nuclear retaliation, and that this is making nuclear war more, not less, likely.”
As Putin in his press conference earlier today likened the Obama regime to “scientists in a lab experimenting with rats” in regards to their continued destabilization of nations like Ukraine, it should be noted that Russia’s leader in anticipating this aggression, in 2010, ordered 5,000 additional atomic bomb shelters to be built in Moscow, and which were completed in 2012.
And with Russian military forces and ministry officials now heading to them by Putin’s order today…one can only wonder where the American people will shelter as Obama nears completion of this new experiment of his?
Note: Additional articles to read explaining the Crisis In Ukraine include: 800,000 Ukrainian Refugees Flood Into Russia As Nazi Forces Continue Eastern March, Putin Sends Feared Shock Troops, Division Into Ukraine, Warns Obama Is “Unstable”, Putin Orders Military Alert To Defend Ukraine Against Western-Backed Fascists, Ukrainian Mob Call To “Kill All Jews” Horrifies Russia, Putin Orders Troops To Crimea Passes, Warns NATO Of War, Russian Threat Of War Over Ukraine Stuns Obama Regime, US In “Shock And Turmoil” After Snowden Info Lets Russia Tap Top Obama Officials
March 4, 2014 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.
[Ed. Note: Western governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagrees with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth. Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ against us has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit and which is addressed in the report “Who Is Sorcha Faal?”.]
LINK: http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1748.htm

Update On The Elongated Skull Analysis & The Nephilim Connection -audio

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Update On The Elongated Skull Analysis & The Nephilim Connection -audio
Posted By: Jordon [Send E-Mail]
Date: Tuesday, 4-Mar-2014 10:05:10

.
Brien Foerster & L.A. Marzulli - Hour 1 - Paracas Elongated Skull DNA Analysis & The Nephilim Connection

March 3, 2014
Brien Foerster is the author of more than 10 books and has appeared several times on the History Channel’s Ancient Aliens. He is also the assistant director of the Paracas History Museum in Paracas, south of Lima and runs Hidden Inca Tours, exploring ancient Peru and beyond.
Lynn Marzulli is the author of Nephilim, The Unholy Deception, and The Revealing. He possesses an in-depth knowledge on the topic of UFO cults, and is a musician and composer who has recorded a number of albums. He received an honorary Doctorate degree from Pacific International University for his work on Nephilim. L.A. and Brien return to discuss the mysterious elongated Parakus skulls of Peru.
We’ll hear about the skull sample test results and how the DNA mutations are unknown in any human, primate, or animal known so far. We are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans. Brien talks about what is known of the Paracus culture, while Lynn explains why he believes the skulls are remnants of the Nephilim. In the second hour, we’ll go deeper into the Parakus culture. Is it possible they fled to North America? L.A. and Brien also discuss interesting genetic remnants of other ancient peoples. They’ll talk about how information that challenges the mainstream record is silenced and covered up while the Darwinian model rules science. Later, Marzulli shares more information on the Nephilim.
 New  0  0  0  0

THE DICK ACT OF 1909 !! - This is legit and not a joke..

Subject: Fwd: FW: THE DICK ACT OF 1909 !! - This is legit and not a joke..

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Joe



Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 12:10 PM
Subject: FW: THE DICK ACT OF 1909 !! - This is legit and not a joke..

> Wonder who in Washington is supposed to keep up with all the
> laws that have been passed (and ignored) throughout the years?
>
> THE BILL was passed back in 1902 and grants full rights to
> anyone who wants to own as many guns as they can afford. Any movement
> to limit guns or magazines will be in direct violation of this law.
> Pass it around.
>
> THE DICK ACT OF 1902! (BY CHARLES WILLIAM FREDERICK DICK) ARE
> YOU AWARE OF THIS LAW?
>
> DICK ACT OF 1902 - CAN'T BE REPEALED (GUN CONTROL FORBIDDEN) -
> PROTECTION AGAINST TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT .
>
> IT WOULD APPEAR THAT THE ADMINISTRATION IS COUNTING ON THE
> FACT THAT THE AMERICAN CITIZENS DON'T KNOW THIS, THEIR RIGHTS AND THE
> CONSTITUTION. DON'T PROVE THEM RIGHT.
>
> THE DICK ACT OF 1902 ALSO KNOWN AS THE EFFICIENCY OF MILITIA
> BILL H.R. 11654 OF JUNE 28, 1902 and INVALIDATES ALL SO-CALLED
> GUN-CONTROL LAWS.
>
> It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
>
> The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized
> militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State,
> Territory and District of Columbia; the unorganized militia; and the
> regular army.
>
> The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the
> ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the
> absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms
> of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.
>
>
>
>
>
> The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate
> bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another
> gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
>
> The President of the United States has zero authority without
> violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside
> of their State borders.
>
> The National Guard Militia can only be required by the
> National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution
> (to uphold the laws of the Union ; to suppress insurrection and repel
> invasion). These are the only purposes for which the General
> Government can call upon the National Guard.
>
> Source...
> http://www.civilrightstaskforce.info/gun_control_forbidden.htm
>
> Get this message out to all your email contacts. It's time to
> learn about your rights.
>
> (Thus making all California ( Colorado & others) gun &
> magazine limiting laws illegal !!!)
>
> I'm not so sure the current administration KNOWS, nor even
> cares, what the laws, Constitution, Bill of Rights, Declaration of
> Independence say.
>
> But it doesn't matter to them anyway. He and his minions
> certainly don't have any respect for them or us and will continue to
> do whatever they can get away with to further their cause of gaining
> complete control.
>
> Charles William Frederick Dick (November 3, 1858 - March 13,
> 1945) was a Republican politician from Ohio. He served in the United
> States House of Representatives and U.S. Senate.
>
> I was curious as to who was the Dick in the DICK act of 1909
> and found out little about him, but I found out a little more about
> the Dick Act.
>
>
> http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/gun_control/news.php?q=1237163642
>
>
> www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/gun_control/news.php?q=1237163642
>
> Attorney General Wickersham advised President Taft, "the
> Organized Militia (the National Guard) cannot be employed for
> offensive warfare outside the limits of the United States."
>
> The Honorable William Gordon, in a speech to the House on
> Thursday, October 4, 1917, proved that the action of President Wilson
> in ordering the Organized Militia (the National Guard) to fight a war
> in Europe was so blatantly unconstitutional that he felt Wilson ought
> to have been impeached.
>
> During the war with England an attempt was made by Congress to
> pass a bill authorizing the president to draft 100,000 men between the
> ages of 18 and 45 to invade enemy territory, Canada. The bill was
> defeated in the House by Daniel Webster on the precise point that
> Congress had no such power over the militia as to authorize it to
> empower the President to draft them into the regular army and send
> them out of the country.
>
> The fact is that the President has no constitutional right,
> under any circumstances, to draft men from the militia to fight
> outside the borders of the USA , and not even beyond the borders of
> their respective states. Today, we have a constitutional LAW which
> still stands in waiting for the legislators to obey the Constitution
> which they swore an oath to uphold.
>
> Charles Hughes of the American Bar Association (ABA) made a
> speech which is contained in the Appendix to Congressional Record,
> House, September 10, 1917, pages 6836-6840 which states: "The
> militia, within the meaning of these provisions of the Constitution is
> distinct from the Army of the United States ." In these pages we also
> find a statement made by Daniel Webster, "that the great principle of
> the Constitution on that subject is that the militia is the militia of
> the States and of the General Government; and thus being the militia
> of the States, there is no part of the Constitution worded with
> greater care and with more scrupulous jealousy than that which grants
> and limits the power of Congress over it."
>
> "This limitation upon the power to raise and support armies
> clearly establishes the intent and purpose of the framers of the
> Constitution to limit the power to raise and maintain a standing army
> to voluntary enlistment, because if the unlimited power to draft and
> conscript was intended to be conferred, it would have been a useless
> and puerile thing to limit the use of money for that purpose.
> Conscripted armies can be paid, but they are not required to be, and
> if it had been intended to confer the extraordinary power to draft the
> bodies of citizens and send them out of the country in direct conflict
> with the limitation upon the use of the militia imposed by the same
> section and article, certainly some restriction or limitation would
> have been imposed to restrain the unlimited use of such power."
>
> The Honorable William Gordon Congressional Record, House, Page
> 640 -1917.
>
>
>
>
>
> PASS THIS AROUND TO ALL OF AMERICA!!!!

TO: All the Sheople in Dinarland

TO: All the Sheople in Dinarland

We're being “played” like a badly tuned fiddle. I'll use some common “euphemisms” to make my point. First, the ID ten T syndrome. The ID ten T (ID10T) is someone who dances to the conductor after the orchestra has gone home. This example is my first “real” euphemism.
Euphemism Number 2. How do you keep a ID10T in suspense? I'll tell you tomorrow.
Euphemism Number 3. For the proper “Answer” see other side. Other side says, “See Other Side.”
Euphemism Number 4. If you want to “express yourself” do so in a “Private” Chat-Room. Paste a dozen Emotocons to show everyone that you're a good little “YES” Man and have no opinion different from the private “Mod-Masters.”
Euphemism Number 5. Keep all the Sheople in a “medicated” state of mind by repeating specific words over and over in the same monotone voice showing no excitement; except for:
Euphemism Number 6. “It's ALL GOOD NEWS. Go back to sleep. Soft kitty, warm kitttt...”
Euphemism Number 7. Kumbaya, everybody show your attendance cards with little Gold Stars and little Blue Birds and Red Birds all going “Tweet, Tweet, Tweet.” THAT'LL REALLY SHOW 'EM.
Euphemism Number 8. Keep your voice down and your words (baaa, baaa) sweet, none of this “bur ur urn th th the hou hou house dow dow down” sheep-sh1t.
Euphemism Number 9. Hey, I'm no “Judas-Goat.” I'm just another Sheople like you all. “Hey, every body, this way. Those nice men are not “slaughter-men” - I promise, they're here to feed you.” (Yeah, feed you to the Babylonian Whore.)

Euphemism Number 10. REMEMBER, this was NOT for us. No, we voted those jerk-wads in so they could take ALL the cream for themselves. After all, we don't deserve any of this. We're just along for the ride so, don't set fire to the “life-boat.”

BRIEF FROM PUTIN PRESS CONFERENCE THIS MORNING THAT FINISHED FEW MINUTES AGO

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

BRIEF FROM PUTIN PRESS CONFERENCE THIS MORNING THAT FINISHED FEW MINUTES AGO
Posted By: IZAKOVIC [Send E-Mail]
Date: Tuesday, 4-Mar-2014 06:45:13

Putin: Deploying military force is last resort, but we reserve right
Published time: March 04, 2014 10:49
Edited time: March 04, 2014 11:32
http://rt.com/news/putin-statement-ukraine-russia-743/

Russian President Vladimir Putin (RIA Novosti / Alexey Nokolskiy)
There was an unconstitutional coup and an armed takeover of power in Kiev, Russian President Vladimir Putin stated. Russia is puzzled why there was a need for it at a time when Viktor Yanukovich had conceded to all opposition demands.
The assessment was voiced at a media conference in Moscow.
Putin stressed that the Ukrainian people had a legitimate reason to protest against Yanukovich’s power, considering the overwhelming corruption and other faults of his presidency.
But he objected to the illegitimate way his ouster took place, because it undermined the political stability in the country.
He said that while he personally was not fond of months-long streets protests as a means to pressure the government, he sympathized with the Maidan demonstration members, who were genuinely outraged with the situation in Ukraine.
But at the same time he warned that what happens in Ukraine now may be a replacement of one group of crooks with another, citing the appointments of certain wealthy businessmen with questionable reputations.
Yanukovich is certainly powerless in Ukraine, but legally speaking he is the legitimate president of the country, Putin said. The way the new authorities in Kiev replaced him did not enhance their credibility.
Putin, who was given a mandate by the Russian senate to use military force to protect civilians in Ukraine, said there is no need for such an action yet.
He assured that the surprise military drills in Russia’s west which ended on Tuesday had nothing to do with the Ukrainian situation.
Putin cited the actions of radical activists in Ukraine, including the chaining of an official to a stage as public humiliation and the killing of a technician during an opposition siege of a parliamentary building, as justification for Russia to be concerned for the lives and well-being of people in eastern and southern Ukraine.
(Reuters / David Mdzinarishvili)
Incidents like those are why Russia reserves the option of troop deployment on the table.
The Russian president stressed that Russia wants to see equal participation of all citizens of Ukraine in defining the future of the country. The resistance to the authorities in Kiev, which is evident currently in the eastern and southern Ukraine, shows clearly that currently Kiev does not have a nationwide mandate to govern the country.
Asked about criticism of Russia over its stance on Ukraine, Putin dismissed the accusations that Russia is acting illegitimately. He stated that even if Russia does use force in Ukraine, it would not violate international law.
At the same time he accused the United States and its allies of having no regard to legitimacy, when they use military force in pursuit of their own national interests. He cited the campaigns in Iraq and in Libya as examples of such behavior.
As for the sanctions Russia faces over Ukraine, Putin said those threatening them should think of the consequences to themselves if they follow that path. In an interconnected world a country may hurt another country if it wishes, but it would be damaged too.
Threats are counterproductive in this situation, Putin warned. He added that if G8 members choose not to go to Sochi for a planned G8 summit, that would be up to them.
Putin dismissed the notion that the uniformed armed people without insignia who are currently present in Crimea are Russian soldiers. He said they are members of the Crimean self-defense forces and that they are no better equipped and trained than some radical fighters who took part in the ousting of Yanukovich.
Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych arrives for his press-conference in southern Russian city of Rostov-on-Don, on February 28, 2014. (AFP Photo / Andrey Kronberg)
Russia is not planning to go to war with the Ukrainian people, Putin stressed, when a journalist asked if he was afraid of war. But Russian troops would prevent any attempts to target Ukrainian civilians, should they be deployed.
Asked about the presence of snipers during the violent confrontation in Kiev last month, Putin said he was not aware of any order from the Yanukovich government to use firearms against the protesters. He alleged that the shooters could have been provocateurs from one of the opposition forces. He added that what he was sure of is the fact that police officers were shot at with lethal arms during the confrontation.
Putin does not see any political future for Yanukovich, which he told the ousted Ukrainian president himself. He added that Russia allowed him to come to its territory for humanitarian reasons, because if he remained in Ukraine he could have been summarily executed.
Russia will be watching the planned presidential election in Ukraine, Putin said. If it is conducted in an atmosphere of terror, Russia will consider it unfair and will not recognize its results, he warned.
The Russian government is currently engaging with the self-proclaimed govern of Ukraine with the goal of preserving economic ties between the two countries. However, any normal relations would only be possible after Ukraine has fully legitimate branches of government, Putin said. He considers that he has no counterpart in Kiev now, so he personally has no partner to communicate with.
Putin commented on the issue of Ukraine’s territorial integrity, which Russia committed to preserve. He said that Western powers reject Russia’s assessment of the events in Ukraine as a coup and insist on calling it a revolution.
Some Russian experts, Putin warned that if Ukraine had undergone a revolution, then the nation that came out of it is not the same that it was before, similarly to how Russia transformed after the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917.
If this is the case, Moscow may consider itself no longer bound by any treaties it has with Ukraine, Putin warned.
---
IZAKOVIC
http://www.deepspace4.com

Monday, March 3, 2014

MUST READ! Breach of Trust (Fee Schedule) “It is the responsibility of those who exercise power to show that it is legitimate.” Noam Chomsky It is not possible to charge or arrest people for statutory offenses under the common law.

Monday, March 3, 2014

Breach of Trust (Fee Schedule)

“It is the responsibility of those who exercise power to show that it is legitimate.” Noam Chomsky

It is not possible to charge or arrest people for statutory offenses under the common law. The U.S. Corp. is operating under presumed Admiralty – Maritime (pirate) jurisdiction when they arrest “persons” (within 2-letter code followed by 5 number code “pirate jurisdiction”) for statutory offenses. This is considered an “in rem” action against a vessel (action against the thing).

In “Economic Analysis of Property Rights”, Cambridge University Press, 2nd Edition, Barzel observed that, what really matters for an individual is his ability to “use” a given commodity. Under these considerations, it can be seen that the extent to which an individual can enjoy the attributes of his or her property actually defines his rights over that good. To make his point, Barzel stated that “anyone who expects to benefit from an asset, be it a legal owner or a thief, is (at least) a partial owner”. To include this real but informal dimension, Barzel defines property rights to include legal (formal) property rights and economic (informal) property rights.

In the case of human bodies – ideas, labor, tissues, etc. – one can observe that the owners of these “commodities,” have exclusive prerogatives over the benefits that they can provide:
• They can derive income from them in the form of capture at transaction time.
• They can exclude others from using them.
• They can also grant similar advantages to selected others.

Therefore, until such time as a statute-enforcing police officer, magistrate, attorney, judge, sheriff, real estate agent, other public officer or any other agent and other so-called public officers all employees actually legitimize their actions by proving their case in a court of law that a man or woman is guilty of an alleged crime, that man or woman has every Right to “keep the meter running,” so to speak, by putting these people on notice that they have liability pursuant to a Fee Schedule.

If the man or woman has put those impersonating govt. on notice to the effect that a Fee Schedule is in place, and the people acting in their capacities as police, attorneys, etc., fail to challenge this notice within a specified time, then the man or woman is entitled to recovery of remedy for damages in spite of the outcome of any criminal proceeding that the public officers may initiate as a separate action.

Most fundamentally, these rights to own our bodies as “property” and to engage in voluntary exchange are also basic common-law rights, and the two basic principles of voluntary capitalism. These principles are in accordance with the U.S. Constitution as intended by our Founding Fathers. The 5th Amendment states that no one may be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.

“Where rights as secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which will abrogate them.” Miranda v. Ariz., 384 U.S. 436 at 491 (1966).

The spirit of voluntary capitalism was expressed in this famous Supreme Court case, which reads:

“The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.” Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1906).

Very few Americans (including lawyers) know that federal legislative and territorial jurisdiction is very limited. It is limited to the ten square miles of Washington District of Columbia, certain military bases where States have ceded jurisdiction, certain territories such as Puerto Rico and Guam, and certain Guano islands.

Therefore, as soon as a man or woman can show that a police officer, magistrate, judge, sheriff, real estate agent, other public officer or any other agent, magistrate, etc., is working for the corporation d/b/a/ the Govt. of the U.S. incorporated in 1871,  they have shown that those people do not have jurisdiction over the man or woman on the land in the various states of the union.


John MacHaffie

2 comments:

Join the Republic of Good Hope (International). Their website is http://www.republicofgoodhope.org All the information you require is available from it, just email and feel free to ask. See also their facebook link for more information and discussions.

If the government of your country is Registered as a Corporation in the Securities Exchange Commission SEC and Head Office in Washington DC (Crown - City of London) this fact renders any Contract between your Person and the said government Null and Void as there was never any Public Consultation and you were never presented with the Terms and Conditions for such Fraudulent Contract/s, therefore your Citizenship is now Revoked with Immediate Effect and…

As Consequence of this you are No Longer a Citizen, Subject, Vessel, Person, Ens Legis, Artificial Entity, Procedural Phantom, Legal Fiction or Juristic Personality within the said corporation posing as government and you Consciously Waiver any Benefits and/or Privileges attached to such Status. Your status changes to one that will Stand now as a Free and Unlimited Man/Woman On The Land with your Sovereignty and Inalienable Rights Fully Restored.

You may also wish to deregister from any government voting / election process when and if you realize that all along you have been voting yourself into subservience of the corporations. Of course there is much more to consider but this is just the start to a better world.
Reply
  1.  
  2. March 3, 2014 at 3:53 PM
Yes there is Common Law Remedy. In Section 9 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, Congress implemented the constitutional grant:
". . . the district courts . . . shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction . . . saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it . . . see 53. 53 1 Stat. 76-77, The provision has been carried over in somwhat altered language, into 28 U.S.C.A. Stat. 1333; see infra at note 125.

You will find it in Law of Admiralty under Admiralty Jurisdiction in the United States. The Jurisdiction and Procedure of Courts Sec. 1-9. Cl.
Some of us kept our old Original Jurisdiction law books.  V.K.D.   http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2014/03/breach-of-trust-fee-schedule.html#comment-form
  1. U.S. CodeTitle 28Part IVChapter 85 › § 1333

28 U.S. Code § 1333 - Admiralty, maritime and prize cases http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1333


  1.  
  2. Reply