Monday, March 3, 2014
Breach
of Trust (Fee Schedule)
“It is the responsibility of those who exercise
power to show that it is legitimate.” Noam Chomsky
It is not possible
to charge or arrest people for statutory offenses under the common
law. The U.S. Corp. is operating under presumed Admiralty –
Maritime (pirate) jurisdiction when they arrest “persons” (within
2-letter code followed by 5 number code “pirate jurisdiction”) for statutory
offenses. This is considered an “in rem” action against a vessel (action
against the thing).
In “Economic Analysis of Property Rights”,
Cambridge University Press, 2nd Edition, Barzel observed that, what really
matters for an individual is his ability to “use” a given commodity. Under
these considerations, it can be seen that the extent to which an individual can
enjoy the attributes of his or her property actually defines his rights over
that good. To make his point, Barzel stated that “anyone who expects to benefit
from an asset, be it a legal owner or a thief, is (at least) a partial owner”.
To include this real but informal dimension, Barzel defines property rights to
include legal (formal) property rights and economic (informal) property rights.
In the case of human bodies – ideas, labor,
tissues, etc. – one can observe that the owners of these “commodities,” have
exclusive prerogatives over the benefits that they can provide:
• They can derive income from them in the form
of capture at transaction time.
• They can exclude others from using them.
• They can also grant similar advantages to
selected others.
Therefore, until such time as a
statute-enforcing police officer, magistrate, attorney, judge, sheriff,
real estate agent, other public officer or any other agent and other
so-called public officers all employees actually legitimize their actions by
proving their case in a court of law that a man or woman is guilty of an
alleged crime, that man or woman has every Right to “keep the meter running,” so
to speak, by putting these people on notice that they have liability pursuant
to a Fee Schedule.
If the man or woman has
put those impersonating govt. on notice to the effect that
a Fee
Schedule is in place, and the people acting in their capacities as
police, attorneys, etc., fail to challenge this notice within a specified time, then the man or woman
is entitled to recovery of remedy for damages in spite of the outcome of any
criminal proceeding that the public officers may initiate as a separate action.
Most fundamentally, these rights to own our
bodies as “property” and to engage in voluntary exchange are also basic
common-law rights, and the two basic principles of voluntary capitalism. These
principles are in accordance with the U.S. Constitution as intended by our
Founding Fathers. The 5th Amendment states that no one may be deprived of life,
liberty or property without due process of law.
“Where rights as secured by the Constitution are
involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which will abrogate
them.” Miranda v. Ariz., 384 U.S. 436 at 491 (1966).
The spirit of voluntary capitalism was expressed
in this famous Supreme Court case, which reads:
“The individual may stand upon his
constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private
business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such
duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the State, since he
receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His
rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent
to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process
of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal
to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from
arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the
public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.” Hale v. Henkel,
201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1906).
Very few Americans (including lawyers) know that
federal legislative and territorial jurisdiction is very limited. It is limited
to the ten square miles of Washington District of Columbia, certain military
bases where States have ceded jurisdiction, certain territories such as
Puerto Rico and Guam, and certain Guano islands.
Therefore, as soon as a man or woman can show
that a police officer, magistrate, judge, sheriff, real estate
agent, other public officer or any other agent, magistrate, etc., is
working for the corporation d/b/a/ the Govt. of the U.S. incorporated in
1871, they have shown that those people do not have jurisdiction
over the man or woman on the land in the various states of the union.
John MacHaffie
2 comments:
Reply
Yes there is Common Law
Remedy. In Section 9 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, Congress implemented the
constitutional grant:
". . . the district courts . . . shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction . . . saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it . . . see 53. 53 1 Stat. 76-77, The provision has been carried over in somwhat altered language, into 28 U.S.C.A. Stat. 1333; see infra at note 125.
You will find it in Law of Admiralty under Admiralty Jurisdiction in the United States. The Jurisdiction and Procedure of Courts Sec. 1-9. Cl.
Some of us kept our old Original Jurisdiction law books. V.K.D. http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2014/03/breach-of-trust-fee-schedule.html#comment-form
". . . the district courts . . . shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction . . . saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it . . . see 53. 53 1 Stat. 76-77, The provision has been carried over in somwhat altered language, into 28 U.S.C.A. Stat. 1333; see infra at note 125.
You will find it in Law of Admiralty under Admiralty Jurisdiction in the United States. The Jurisdiction and Procedure of Courts Sec. 1-9. Cl.
Some of us kept our old Original Jurisdiction law books. V.K.D. http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2014/03/breach-of-trust-fee-schedule.html#comment-form
- U.S.
Code › Title 28 › Part IV › Chapter 85
› § 1333
28 U.S. Code § 1333 -
Admiralty, maritime and prize cases http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1333
- Reply
If the government of your country is Registered as a Corporation in the Securities Exchange Commission SEC and Head Office in Washington DC (Crown - City of London) this fact renders any Contract between your Person and the said government Null and Void as there was never any Public Consultation and you were never presented with the Terms and Conditions for such Fraudulent Contract/s, therefore your Citizenship is now Revoked with Immediate Effect and…
As Consequence of this you are No Longer a Citizen, Subject, Vessel, Person, Ens Legis, Artificial Entity, Procedural Phantom, Legal Fiction or Juristic Personality within the said corporation posing as government and you Consciously Waiver any Benefits and/or Privileges attached to such Status. Your status changes to one that will Stand now as a Free and Unlimited Man/Woman On The Land with your Sovereignty and Inalienable Rights Fully Restored.
You may also wish to deregister from any government voting / election process when and if you realize that all along you have been voting yourself into subservience of the corporations. Of course there is much more to consider but this is just the start to a better world.