KTFA's
Memphis "Can We Go Even Higher?"
03/27/2014
Post From KTFA By Memphis » March 27th,
2014 Can we go even higher?
It has been a frustration, a mental stretch, for me to convey that which I see clearly in such a manner that many others can view things as I do. Try it sometime!
The discussion always goes back to a fundamental need for us to think bigger, from a higher plane and this is NOT me "talking down" to anyone as we are all learning here.
Today I will yet again take us higher in attempt to express how I can have such confidence in the ways things are to play out. The news is saying one thing and yet I am yelling another? Climb up here with me for a few minutes and allow me to show you something....
To begin, I am stubborn and I propose that this attribute serves us well in such affairs. You can re-frame the discussion and convince me to move my position but once I am planted in a line of thinking it requires sound argument to overcome my stubbornness as I ALWAYS stay in the bar for the fight.
~~~
It has been a frustration, a mental stretch, for me to convey that which I see clearly in such a manner that many others can view things as I do. Try it sometime!
The discussion always goes back to a fundamental need for us to think bigger, from a higher plane and this is NOT me "talking down" to anyone as we are all learning here.
Today I will yet again take us higher in attempt to express how I can have such confidence in the ways things are to play out. The news is saying one thing and yet I am yelling another? Climb up here with me for a few minutes and allow me to show you something....
To begin, I am stubborn and I propose that this attribute serves us well in such affairs. You can re-frame the discussion and convince me to move my position but once I am planted in a line of thinking it requires sound argument to overcome my stubbornness as I ALWAYS stay in the bar for the fight.
~~~
As you read in yesterday's post, the news is attempting to
alter the debate, to convince us that there is "nothing to see here".
I just received more such talk in email, here is an excerpt that will
illuminate what I am about to share:
"...Senate Democrats backed down and stripped International Monetary Fund reform language from the bill. The move signaled a retreat for Democrats and the Obama administration, which had promoted the IMF provisions."
Let's be clear, I am not disputing this statement but am suggesting that we can read it from a higher ELEVATED perspective and then (and only then) walk away with confidence in our thinking.
After this post, you will read the above quote with a fresh (imo, properly focused) perspective. With clarity as to it's value to us.
I have spoken often that the actions of all governments to hunt down capital is extremely deflationary. Capital all across the globe is seeking the one thing that is required above all...a place of safety. Smart money is not presently seeking high risk, high return.
The cycle for such things will return but it is not now. FATCA's final date has been set to July01, 2014 and it too is driving capital underground!
The world's shifting (evidence of many cycles converging) requires that we preserve capital thru avoiding the pitfalls, the low hanging fruit that gov't and banks have their eyes on and this requires us to L@@K at their playbook.
Nova (strongly) hinted to this Tuesday. The following blog from Martin Armstrong came to me just hours ago and it's message (the surface text) is all about our insane gov't attempts to get our "stuff".
What I am asking here is that you take all that you have learned in recent weeks and read the article from this higher vantage point, knowing that everything is connected. In doing so? you will find EVIDENCE that we often can support one position by reading material speaking to a totally unrelated matter such as the hunt for money. Please get this. :-)
Being specific now, this article's message to me is FULLY supportive that our president is joined at the hip with the director of the IMF Christine Lagarde in the context of their THINKING for THAT is the key here!
Again, PLEASE recognize the value, the importance in this fact. Do not presume that any of these players has resigned themselves to defeat folks. They have not. :thug:
As I have been saying all week, we just need to let things play out. As we wait, I propose that you carefully study this short blog as I have framed it and then go re-read the above quote in red asking yourself this question:
Are these guys truly in "retreat"?
And see if you agree/disagree with my conclusion(s) for it is my solid position that in the end these people always...............get their way.... Blessings, Memphis
Obama & Lagarde – Destroying the World Economy- A Lethal Combination
Posted on March 27, 2014 by Martin Armstrong
Image
"...Senate Democrats backed down and stripped International Monetary Fund reform language from the bill. The move signaled a retreat for Democrats and the Obama administration, which had promoted the IMF provisions."
Let's be clear, I am not disputing this statement but am suggesting that we can read it from a higher ELEVATED perspective and then (and only then) walk away with confidence in our thinking.
After this post, you will read the above quote with a fresh (imo, properly focused) perspective. With clarity as to it's value to us.
I have spoken often that the actions of all governments to hunt down capital is extremely deflationary. Capital all across the globe is seeking the one thing that is required above all...a place of safety. Smart money is not presently seeking high risk, high return.
The cycle for such things will return but it is not now. FATCA's final date has been set to July01, 2014 and it too is driving capital underground!
The world's shifting (evidence of many cycles converging) requires that we preserve capital thru avoiding the pitfalls, the low hanging fruit that gov't and banks have their eyes on and this requires us to L@@K at their playbook.
Nova (strongly) hinted to this Tuesday. The following blog from Martin Armstrong came to me just hours ago and it's message (the surface text) is all about our insane gov't attempts to get our "stuff".
What I am asking here is that you take all that you have learned in recent weeks and read the article from this higher vantage point, knowing that everything is connected. In doing so? you will find EVIDENCE that we often can support one position by reading material speaking to a totally unrelated matter such as the hunt for money. Please get this. :-)
Being specific now, this article's message to me is FULLY supportive that our president is joined at the hip with the director of the IMF Christine Lagarde in the context of their THINKING for THAT is the key here!
Again, PLEASE recognize the value, the importance in this fact. Do not presume that any of these players has resigned themselves to defeat folks. They have not. :thug:
As I have been saying all week, we just need to let things play out. As we wait, I propose that you carefully study this short blog as I have framed it and then go re-read the above quote in red asking yourself this question:
Are these guys truly in "retreat"?
And see if you agree/disagree with my conclusion(s) for it is my solid position that in the end these people always...............get their way.... Blessings, Memphis
Obama & Lagarde – Destroying the World Economy- A Lethal Combination
Posted on March 27, 2014 by Martin Armstrong
Image
Christine Lagarde is a
french lawyer who became chairman of the Chicago firm Baker & McKenzie.
Obama endorsed Lagarde ahead of the vote claiming a woman would be proper after
Dominique Strauss-Kahn, had to resign after being charged with attempted rape
in New York.
However, the maid was found to be anything but credible and there is a dark cloud that hangs over this entire ordeal. Strauss-Kahn was against some of the corruption he saw and to get Lagarde in that position made it perfect to turn Strauss-Kahn into an alleged rapist. Very curious.
Lagarde has been a notorious French socialist to say the least. In an interview with The Guardian in May 2012, Lagarde was asked about economic crisis in Greece.
Her response gave a deep glimpse into how the French elite view people with any money and her endorsement by Obama is no coincidence.
“Do you know what? As far as Athens is concerned, I also think about all those people who are trying to escape tax all the time. All these people in Greece who are trying to escape tax.”
reporter: Even more than you think about all those now struggling to survive without jobs or public services?
"I think of them equally. And I think they should also help themselves collectively.”
reporter: How?
"By all paying their tax. Yeah.”
reporter: It sounds as if you essentially are saying to the Greeks and others in Europe, you’ve had a nice time and now it’s payback time.
"That’s right.” She nods calmly. “Yeah.”
Obama is of the same mindset and views anyone who even tries to hide money as a criminal. Sources have been warning all along that Obama would like to see the tax rate restored to where it was before Reagan – 70%. With the new technology to track money and with Lagarde, the two have been pushing to try to shut down every possible avenue to store wealth they cannot get their hands on.
Lagarde and Obama are actually pushing the rest of the G20 into destroying the world economy. They think they actually have a right to whatever you earn and it is their decision how that should be spent and they should decide what you “need” to sustain life.
This is a very serious issue for these two are responsible for the inability of the world to recover and this is why the emerging markets have declined so sharply because these people are wiping out the ability to expand investment globally for anyone who has money outside their reach is assumed to be criminal,
The failure of government and their inability to pay pensions will be blamed on anyone who has money, which is the real definition of the “rich”. If you earn any income, it belongs to them to decide what to do with it.
They tell themselves that their intentions justify their actions, but they are still violating the Ten Commandments by coveting their neighbor’s goods.
However, the maid was found to be anything but credible and there is a dark cloud that hangs over this entire ordeal. Strauss-Kahn was against some of the corruption he saw and to get Lagarde in that position made it perfect to turn Strauss-Kahn into an alleged rapist. Very curious.
Lagarde has been a notorious French socialist to say the least. In an interview with The Guardian in May 2012, Lagarde was asked about economic crisis in Greece.
Her response gave a deep glimpse into how the French elite view people with any money and her endorsement by Obama is no coincidence.
“Do you know what? As far as Athens is concerned, I also think about all those people who are trying to escape tax all the time. All these people in Greece who are trying to escape tax.”
reporter: Even more than you think about all those now struggling to survive without jobs or public services?
"I think of them equally. And I think they should also help themselves collectively.”
reporter: How?
"By all paying their tax. Yeah.”
reporter: It sounds as if you essentially are saying to the Greeks and others in Europe, you’ve had a nice time and now it’s payback time.
"That’s right.” She nods calmly. “Yeah.”
Obama is of the same mindset and views anyone who even tries to hide money as a criminal. Sources have been warning all along that Obama would like to see the tax rate restored to where it was before Reagan – 70%. With the new technology to track money and with Lagarde, the two have been pushing to try to shut down every possible avenue to store wealth they cannot get their hands on.
Lagarde and Obama are actually pushing the rest of the G20 into destroying the world economy. They think they actually have a right to whatever you earn and it is their decision how that should be spent and they should decide what you “need” to sustain life.
This is a very serious issue for these two are responsible for the inability of the world to recover and this is why the emerging markets have declined so sharply because these people are wiping out the ability to expand investment globally for anyone who has money outside their reach is assumed to be criminal,
The failure of government and their inability to pay pensions will be blamed on anyone who has money, which is the real definition of the “rich”. If you earn any income, it belongs to them to decide what to do with it.
They tell themselves that their intentions justify their actions, but they are still violating the Ten Commandments by coveting their neighbor’s goods.
No comments:
Post a Comment