Emails Reveal White House & State Dept. Worked Together to “Crush” Clinton Email Scandal

Newly released emails show that the State Department and the White House coordinated efforts to protect Secretary of State John Kerry from being asked questions in an interview on CBS News' "Face the Nation" about Hillary Clinton's emails.
"Think we can get this done so [Kerry] is not asked about email," Jennifer Palmieri, then the White House's communications director, wrote to then-State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki on March 12, 2015.
The Republican National Committee sued to obtain the emails and in one of the emails Ben Rhodes, Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah's deputy national security advisor for strategic communications whose brother is also the president of CBS News, was involved in discussing Kerry's appearance on CBS. Anyone sense a conflict of interest here?
However, in a March 13, 2015 email titled "Good to go on killing CBS idea, Psaki told Palmieri, "…we are going to hold on any other TV options just given the swirl of crap out there."

On the day before, March 12, Palmeri, in an email with the subject line "between us on shows" wrote to Psaki, "Think we can get this done so he is not asked about email."
"Agree completely and working to crush on my end," she added.

We're not told just how Palmeri would perform this "crush," but on March 10 she, Psaki and Ben Rhodes discussed the issue in an email with the subject line "Face the Nation – Kerry."

Of course, a CBS News spokeswoman told The Wall Street Journal that no agreement was made with either the White House or the State Department to withhold questions concerning the Clinton emails.
"No subject was off-limits when this interview was arranged, as is the CBS News standard," Caitlin Conant said. "CBS News' State Department correspondent was in Egypt with Secretary John Kerry in the home stretch of the Iran nuclear deal negotiations and discussed policy issues of the day with him on this official trip."
If you recall, Ben Rhodes was at the center of changing the talking points on Benghazi. He was also behind the infamous Cairo speech in which Obama distorted the Qur'an to put it in a good light and attempted to make out like Islam had made great contributions to both America and the world.
Yeah, seems like the White House, the State Department and CBS can deny this took place all they want, but in the end do either of these have any credibility at this point?

LATEST FROM JIM STONE (WARNING --- ADULT THEMES/LANGUAGE)

October 8 2016

CLINTONS NUKED.

Ok, this is big. It is a story with several facets.

 

1. The U.S. government issued an accusation against Russia (with no proof whatsoever) that Russia did the latest hacks, which netted over a million documents that prove massive corruption within the democrat party.

2. This was done after the democrats said the documents were not real. PROBLEM: IF THEY WERE NOT REAL, THEN THE HACK WOULD NOT BE REAL, AND RUSSIA WOULD NOT BE THE SOURCE, AUTOMATICALLY. Problem. BIG problem. The U.S. government, from the highest levels, just told the entire American public that these documents now being released ARE REAL by accusing Russia of releasing them.

3. The documents are more than spicy. Already one of them proves that Bill Clinton, as President, accepted a million dollar bribe for approving the Keystone pipeline. That's huge. And there is lots more.

4. So what did the Clinton team do? It released a recording of Donald Trump "talking lewd" about women. In the recording, trump said "I just start kissing them..Just kiss. I don’t even wait,' "Grab them by the pussy" "And when you’re a star they let you do it." So Trump fired back with some of the things Bill has said on the golf course. One that stands out is "Hillary has eaten more pussy than I have". Ouch. That stings. I'd like confirmation on that, but apparently Bill really did say that.

So this is backfiring badly on Hillary, and she's having her troll team - "Correct the Record" - go online with a blaze of comments saying the Republican party is going to cancel Trump's nomination, that Trump is dropping out, and that this is all so horrible, all the while Hillary and Bill are guilty of so much worse it's laughable.

5. All of this is happening against the awful back drop of what is going on in Syria, and Hillary's desperate need to start a huge war with Russia. They were hoping that releasing this against Trump would destroy him. It backfired. And when war is the only other option, that's spooky. -so-

Keep your ear to the rail, something huge might be coming soon.

The biggest free .pdf conspiracy theory ebook library on the internet!

Loads of interesting free pdf books available at: http://www.vrijewereld.org/pdf-bibliotheek/


Enjoy!

"THE BATTLING BOYS OF BENGHAZI"

"THE BATTLING BOYS OF BENGHAZI"

A short poem you won't forget.

Do you recall the President referring to the Benghazi incident as "a bump in the road?"

Today I heard an ex-Navy Seal being interviewed on Fox News regarding a book he has

Written about how to handle crisis situations in our lives.

At the end of the interview he asked if he could make a comment on Benghazi and, of course,

The anchor said "yes."

He then thanked Fox News for keeping the Benghazi story in the news, since other news organizations are not.

He said the Seals who died deserve the public knowing the truth about the whole Affair.

The poem was written by an anonymous Marine Corps officer:
"THE BATTLING BOYS OF BENGHAZI"


We're the battling boys of Benghazi

No fame, no glory, no paparazzi.

Just a fiery death in a blazing hell

Defending our country we loved so well.

It wasn't our job, but we answered the call

Fought to the Consulate and scaled the wall.

We pulled twenty countrymen from the jaws of fate

Led them to safety and stood at the gate.

Just the two of us and foes by the score

But we stood fast to bar the door.

Three calls for reinforcement, but all were denied,

So we fought and we fought and we fought 'til we died.

We gave our all for our Uncle Sam

But Barack and Hillary didn't give a damn.

Just two dead Seals who carried the load

No thanks to us...we were just

"Bumps In The Road".

----00----


So, will this reach every American with a computer? Or do we act like the press and give a pass to the people who literally sat there in the White House and watched the Seals' execution on live streaming video and did absolutely nothing?

"What difference does it make?" would say Hillary Clinton!" 

And she wants to be the next President!?

 

Hillary Clinton 9-11 memorial

A message from the messengers  

 

 
Published on Sep 28, 2016

FBI agents are ready to revolt over the cozy Clinton probe

Hillary Clinton and FBI Director James Comey Photo: Getty Images

Veteran FBI agents say FBI Director James Comey has permanently damaged the bureau’s reputation for uncompromising investigations with his “cowardly” whitewash of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information using an unauthorized private email server.

Feeling the heat from congressional critics, Comey last week argued that the case was investigated by career FBI agents, “So if I blew it, they blew it, too.”
But agents say Comey tied investigators’ hands by agreeing to unheard-of ground rules and other demands by the lawyers for Clinton and her aides that limited their investigation.

“In my 25 years with the bureau, I never had any ground rules in my interviews,” said retired agent Dennis V. Hughes, the first chief of the FBI’s computer investigations unit.

Instead of going to prosecutors and insisting on using grand jury leverage to compel testimony and seize evidence, Comey allowed immunity for several key witnesses, including potential targets.

The immunity agreements came with outrageous side deals, including preventing agents from searching for any documents on a Dell laptop owned by former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills generated after Jan. 31, 2015, when she communicated with the server administrator who destroyed subpoenaed emails.
Comey also agreed to have Mills’ laptop destroyed after the restricted search, denying Congress the chance to look at it and making the FBI an accomplice to the destruction of evidence.

Comey’s immunized witnesses nonetheless suffered chronic lapses in memory, made unsubstantiated claims of attorney-client privilege upon tougher questioning and at least two gave demonstrably false statements. And yet Comey indulged it all.

What’s more, Comey cut a deal to give Clinton a “voluntary” witness interview on a major holiday, and even let her ex-chief of staff sit in on the interview as a lawyer, even though she, too, was under investigation.

Clinton’s interview, the culmination of a yearlong investigation, lasted just 3½ hours. Despite some 40 bouts of amnesia, she wasn’t called back for questioning; and three days later, Comey cleared her of criminal wrongdoing.
“The FBI has politicized itself, and its reputation will suffer for a long time,” Hughes said. “I hold Director Comey responsible.”

Agreed retired FBI agent Michael M. Biasello: “Comey has singlehandedly ruined the reputation of the organization.”

The accommodations afforded Clinton and her aides are “unprecedented,” Biasello added, “which is another way of saying this outcome was by design.” He called Comey’s decision not to seek charges “cowardly.”

“Each month for 27 years, I received oral and computer admonishments concerning the proper protocol for handling top secret and other classified material, and was informed of the harsh penalties, to include prosecution and incarceration,” for mishandling such material, he pointed out. “Had myself or my colleagues engaged in behavior of the magnitude of Hillary Clinton, as described by Comey, we would be serving time in Leavenworth.”

Former FBI official I.C. Smith knows a thing or two about Clinton corruption. After working at FBI headquarters as a section chief in the National Security Division, he retired as special agent in charge of the Little Rock, Ark., field office, where he investigated top Clinton fundraisers for public corruption and even Chinese espionage.

“FBI agents upset with Comey’s decision have every reason to feel that way,” Smith said. “Clearly there was a different standard applied to Clinton.”

“I have no doubt resourceful prosecutors and FBI agents could have come up with some charge that she would have been subject to prosecution,” the 25-year veteran added. “What she did is absolutely abhorrent for anyone who has access to classified information.”

Smith said Congress should subpoena the case’s agents to testify about the direction they received from Comey and their supervisors: “It would be interesting to see what the results would be if those involved with the investigation were questioned under oath.”

Comey made the 25 agents who worked on the case sign nondisclosure agreements. But others say morale has sunk inside the bureau.

“The director is giving the bureau a bad rap with all the gaps in the investigation,” one agent in the Washington field office said. “There’s a perception that the FBI has been politicized and let down the country.”

Comey has turned a once-proud institution known for its independence into one that bows to election pressure, hands out political immunity to candidates and effectively pardons their co-conspirators. He’s turned the FBI into the Federal Bureau of Immunity and lost the trust and respect of not only his agents but the country at large. He ought to step down.

217

FEDERAL BANK OF RICHMOND_NOTICE OF DEFAULT_MAY 2006

NOTICE OF DEFAULT

FEDERAL BANK OF RICHMOND

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.

Office of the Chairman / Chief Executive Officer

Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta

Telefon : 202.379.2904

Telefax : 703.552.3159

S.D.R. Diplomatic Passport No. 04362, 12535

4001 North 9 th Street, Suite No. 227

Arlington, Virginia, USA  22203-1954

Commonwealth of Virginia

_________________________________________________

White House INTEL Files Received and Acknowledged -

 http://eagleonetowanta.com/?page_id=12

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_3jgv6fRzM

http://nesara.news/index.php

https://twitter.com/eagleonetowanta

https://twitter.com/diplomate418

http://eagleonetowanta.com

https://vimeo.com/158213524

http://eagleonetowanta.com/?page_id=10

https://vimeo.com/user16311094/review/160965789/b57fb62f43

Attachments:

• federal_reserve_bank_of_richmond_may_2006.pdf (2.1 MB)
•  
•  

This Was the Week the World Got Really Anxious About Globalization's Future

Markets might never be the same again.

Donald Trump, 2016 Republican presidential nominee, exits the stage after speaking at a campaign event in Des Moines, Iowa, U.S., on Tuesday, Sept. 13, 2016.

Photographer: Daniel Acker/Bloomberg

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Share on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on Google+E-mail

Weak global trade, fears that the U.K. is marching towards a hard Brexit, and polls indicating that the U.S. election remains a tighter call than markets are pricing in have led a bevy of analysts to redouble their warnings that a backlash over globalization is poised to roil global financial markets—with profound consequences for the real economy and investment strategies.
From the economists and politicians at the annual IMF meeting in Washington to strategists on Wall Street trying to advise clients, everyone seems to be pondering a future in which cooperation and global trade may look much different than they do now.

Brexit

Suggestions that the U.K. will prioritize control over its migration policy at the expense of open access to Europe's single market in negotiations to leave the European Union—a strategy that's being dubbed a "hard Brexit"—loomed large over global markets. The U.K. government is “strongly supportive of open markets, free markets, open economies, free trade,” said Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Hammond during a Bloomberg Television interview in New York on Thursday. “But we have a problem—and it’s not just a British problem, it’s a developed-world problem—in keeping our populations engaged and supportive of our market capitalism, our economic model."

Trade

Citing the rising anti-trade sentiment, analysts from Bank of America Merrill Lynch warned that "events show nations are becoming less willing to cooperate, more willing to contest," and a backlash against inequality is likely to trigger more activist fiscal policies. Looser government spending in developed countries—combined with trade protectionism and wealth redistribution—could reshape global investment strategies, unleashing a wave of inflation, the bank argued, amid a looming war against inequality.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew did his part to push for more openness. During an interview in Washington on Thursday, he said that efforts to boost trade, combined with a more equitable distribution of the fruits of economic growth, are key to ensuring U.S. prosperity. Rolling back on globalization would be counterproductive to any attempt to boost median incomes, he added.

Trump

Without mentioning him by name, Lew's comments appeared to nod to Donald Trump, who some believe could take the U.S. down a more isolationist trading path should he be elected president in November. "The emergence of Donald Trump as a political force reflects a mood of growing discontent about immigration, globalization and the distribution of wealth," write analysts at Fathom Consulting, a London-based research firm. Their central scenario is that a Trump administration might be benign for the U.S. economy. "However, in our downside scenario, Donald Dark, global trade falls sharply and a global recession looms. In this world, isolationism wins, not just in the U.S., but globally," they caution.
Analysts at Standard Chartered Plc agree that the tail risks of a Trump presidency could be significant. "The main risk with potentially tough negotiating tactics is that trade partners could panic, especially if global coordination evaporates." They add that business confidence could take a big hit in this context. "The global trade system could descend into a spiral of trade tariffs, reminiscent of what happened after the Smoot-Hawley tariff of 1930, and ultimately a trade war, possibly accompanied by foreign-exchange devaluations; this would be a ‘lose-lose’ deal for all."
Market participants are also concerned that populism could take root under a Hillary Clinton administration. "We believe the liberal base’s demands on a Clinton Administration could lead to an overly expansive federal government with aggressive regulators," write analysts at Barclays Plc. "If the GOP does not unify, Clinton may expand President Obama’s use of executive authority to accomplish her goals."

Managing Risks

No matter who wins in November, Citigroup Inc. Head FX Strategist Steven Englander warns that investors are failing to hedge against rising event risks, with the U.S. election serving as a possible stress test for global markets. "If everyone is positioning to pull the trigger on positioning as soon as they know the outcome, the repressed volatility may emerge in a very sharp burst," he points out.
Amid political attacks on the apparent inequities generated by monetary policy in the U.K., sluggish trade challenging Chinese growth, and the rise of populist movements in Europe, there are plenty of reasons why market players should snap up volatility hedges, analysts say.
"In our view, volatility is going to heat up in the coming months given the U.S. election, China's potential response against a stronger currency, and Italian political risks," concluded Martin Enlund, chief currency strategist at Nordea Markets.

 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-08/this-was-the-week-the-world-got-really-anxious-about-globalization-s-future

Antonio Guterres is set to become the next United Nations secretary-general

THE UNITED NATIONS REVEALS ITS NEXT ELECTED 'LEADER' AS South Korea’s Ban Ki-moon, whose second five-year term ends on December 31st


AMERICANS - BETTER TAKE NOTE AND BEGIN PUSHING BACK RIGHT NOW!!!

October 5, 2016 9:48 pm 

• Global Insecurity

(CNN) – Former Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio Guterres is set to become the next United Nations secretary-general, after the 15 Security Council members agreed to put his name forward to a formal vote.

Guterres, who was head of the UN’s 'refugee' agency for 10 years until 2015, emerged as the Security Council’s runaway favorite after the latest in a series of straw polls on Wednesday.

Vitaly Churkin, the Russian ambassador to the UN and current Security Council president, told reporters that Guterres would face a vote in the Security Council on Thursday.

“Today, after our sixth straw poll we have a clear favorite, and his name is Antonio Guterres,” he said.

Antonio Guterres speaks to reporters at the UN headquarters in New York in April.

Sixth straw poll

The secretary-general of the UN is appointed in a two-stage process. A candidate is first recommended by the Security Council, and must then be approved by the 193-member General Assembly.

Thirteen candidates entered the race, necessitating a series of straw polls held by the Security Council to encourage a thinning of the field and to help to settle on a single candidate.

In every ballot, the 15 Security Council members assessed each candidate by voting either “encourage,” “discourage” or “no opinion.”

In the latest vote, Guterres received 13 “encourage” votes, no “discourage” votes and two votes of “no opinion.”
 

The next closest candidates, Vuk Jeremic of Serbia and Miroslav Lajcak of the Slovak Republic, each received seven “encourage” votes and six “discourage” votes, while Bulgaria’s Irina Bokova received seven “encourage” votes and seven “discourage” votes.

Guterres, 67, will replace the incumbent secretary-general, South Korea’s Ban Ki-moon, whose second five-year term ends on December 31.

While there is technically no limit to the number of terms a secretary-general may serve, none has held office for more than two terms.
 
Former Portuguese PM

Guterres, a trained engineer who worked as an assistant professor before entering politics in 1974, led his country from 1995 to 2002 as head of the Socialist Party.

From 2005 to 2015, he served as the United Nations High Commissioner for 'Refugees'. He is credited with cutting costs at the agency during his tenure, as well as lifting its performance as it grappled with the 'migrant' crisis.

A practicing Catholic, Guterres remarried after his first wife died of cancer, and has two children.  (Note: can anyone find out if Guterres IS A JESUIT??)

In Guterres’ vision statement in applying for the position, he wrote of the challenges facing the world in terms of rising inequality, terrorism and organized crime, climate change and the proliferation of armed actors internationally.

He wrote that the UN was “uniquely placed to connect the dots to overcome these challenges,” but that change and reform was needed.

“People in need of protection are not getting enough. The most vulnerable, such as women and children, are an absolute priority. We must make sure that when someone sees the Blue Flag, she or he can say: ‘I am protected’.” (This policy, of course, does NOT INCLUDE Christians - only muslims, in particular men between 15 and 50, and bringing them in to the united States by the thousands.)

Speaking to reporters in Lisbon, Portuguese President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa said he had congratulated Guterres.

“It is great for the United Nations because the best one was elected, and we many times have the feeling internationally that because of imbalances, weights and counterweights, not always the best is chosen. Here the best one was chosen,” he said.

“This is very good for the world, very good for the United Nations, and it is very good for Portugal.”

US, UK ambassadors praise choice

The ambassadors to the UN for the US and the UK — both veto-wielding permanent members of the Security Council, along with Russia, China and France — welcomed the result.

Samantha Power, US ambassador to the UN, said that “in the end there was just a candidate whose experience, vision and versatility across a range of areas proved compelling. People united around a person who has impressed throughout the process and has impressed across multiple axes in his service in Portuguese politics and at the helm of UNHCR.”

Matthew Rycroft, the UK’s ambassador to the UN, paid tribute to the seven women who had run for the role.

While it was “high time” for a woman secretary-general, he said, “it’s fair to say that Antonio Guterres has come through this new and improved and more transparent process at the top of the league of the thirteen who competed.”

He said the world needed a strong secretary-general who would “provide a convening power and a moral authority at a time when the world is divided on issues, above all like Syria.”

“And I think that Antonio Guterres has demonstrated at the hearings and throughout this process that he is the person to do that.”

Human Rights Watch welcomed the selection of Guterres, with the group’s UN director, Louis Charbonneau, describing him as “an outspoken and effective advocate for 'refugees' with the potential to strike a radically new tone on human rights at a time of great challenges.”

Eastern European nations felt it was their turn
Bulgaria’s Kristalina Georgieva was considered Guterres’ closest rival.

Guterres has long been the front-runner for the role.
Prior to Wednesday’s vote, the candidate considered his closest potential rival was Bulgaria’s Kristalina Georgieva, who only entered the race last month after that government said its other candidate, Bokova, had failed to win enough support in earlier straw polls.

Despite Guterres’ clear lead, it was thought he could potentially face a veto from Russia, which had said it wanted a woman candidate, and would back an Eastern European nominee.

But Georgieva, currently serving as European Commissioner for Budget and Human Resources, ended up back in the field, with five “encourage” votes, eight “discourage” votes and two votes of “no opinion.”

There was a strong sentiment among Eastern European nations that it was their region’s turn to produce the next secretary-general, based on an informal notion of a rotation system — although this is not provided for in the UN charter.

Many of the 13 candidates for the role hailed from Eastern Europe.

http://www.teaparty.org/un-reveals-next-leader-190616/ 

NOW we will wait and see what the ramifications are for our nation as this man, a clear candidate for the 'anti-christ' in this increasing forward movement of the one world government, financial system (via a digital chip which will be required to be injected in to each human body in order to buy or sell), and 'religion' continues with an ever increasing rate of speed. Clearly the Book of Revelation and the Lord God's prophetic warnings of the last days given to the Apostle John are coming forth.


SPECIAL: Fight back against the Establishment Elites! Blast all 535 members of Congress with a red hot “Citizen Declaration of Independence” letter today! Together we can stop the globalist agenda and preserve American values!

Obama  request  just  got  DENIED  by  the  Supreme  Court!

 
Oct. 3, 2016 10:26 am by The Right Scoop

 
Obama was hoping to get a do-over on his illegal amnesty that the Supreme Court split on earlier this year after the death of Justice Scalia. 

When the court split on the decision earlier this year, it thus upheld the lower court decision that Obama didn’t have the constitutional power to execute this illegal amnesty. 

Now Obama’s attempt to get a do-over just failed, as the Supreme Court denied his request to rehear the case.

REUTERS – The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to rehear a bid by President Barack Obama’s administration to revive his plan to spare from deportation millions of immigrants in the country illegally, a case in which the justices split 4-4 in June.

In a brief order, the court rejected the administration’s long-shot request, meaning the justices’ June 23 decision is final. That ruling left in place a lower court decision that had blocked the plan, which Obama announced in 2014 but never went into effect. The court remains one justice short following the February death of Antonin Scalia.

Obama’s plan was designed to let roughly 4 million people – those who have lived illegally in the United States at least since 2010, have no criminal record and have children who are U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents – get into a program that shields them from deportation and supplies work permits.

In a July 18 filing, Obama’s Justice Department had asked the court to take a second look at the case once it had a full complement of nine justices.

Obama slapped down by the court again. Can’t say I don’t enjoy this. 

http://therightscoop.com/obama-request-just-got-denied-by-the-supreme-court/ 

Only problem with this:  WHY is this criminal 'administration' continuing to bring into this nation thousands of wrongly labeled 'migrants' and 'refugees' who the Justice Department claims cannot be properly vetted, and thus those coming in are of military age, between 15 and 50, and are muslim only and training in CIA sponsored camps throughout the nation to fight Americans.

Super Soldier James Michael Casbolt

Super Soldier James Michael Casbolt

talks about the 

MONSTERS ON PLANET EARTH

Ever wondered about the child sacrifices,

blood drinking,  canalbalism

or about the Super Soldier program?

There are numerous interviews of 

James Michael Casbolt - look him up on YouTube

You will find out who the 'elite' are

and their modus operandi and why

Major Updates on Putin’s War Ultimatum

Major  Updates  on  Putin’s  War  Ultimatum  for  Eastern  Europe  and  Now  Syria

 

Friday, October 7, 2016 5:18

YESTERDAY, I REPORTED THE FOLLOWING:INFORMATION WHICH STATED THAT RUSSIA HAD ISSUED A WAR ULTIMATUM AGAINST NATO - THE UNITED STATES TO WITHDRAW FROM EASTERN EUROPE. THAT ULTIMATUM HAS BEEN UPDATED WITH NEW INFORMATION. FURTHER, THERE IS A BREAKING DEVELOPMENT THAT A NEW ULTIMATUM HAS BEEN ISSUED.  HERE IS THE LATEST AS WE HAVE IT AT THE COMMON SENSE SHOW:

DEVELOPMENTS:

1. THE US IS INSTALLING TACTICAL NUKES A MISSILE SHIELD IN IRAQ IN PREPARATION FOR A FIRST STRIKE

2. THE RUSSIAN EMBASSY IN WASHINGTON DC HAS ISSUED A THINLY VEILED THREAT TO BACK DOWN IN SYRIA/IRAN.

______________________________

I have consulted with my best military source.  We will call him my “Benghazi source” because he provided information to me during this event that very few people had access to. I have also had conversations with other sources and what I was originally told is being confirmed, and more details from what was reported last night are appearing. Here is  a compilation of what is known from both old and new information:  

NATO moved troops into Eastern European countries in the aftermath of the Ukraine fiasco. The show of force by NATO was designed to discourage the Russians from overrunning Kiev, militarily, like they did in Crimea.

Two years ago Putin, through back-channels, threatened to cut off natural gas and oil to both Eastern and Western Europe if the CIA did not abandon its operations in Ukraine. NATO promptly engaged in a series of offensive drill maneuvers near Russian interests. in defiance to Putin’s threats. I reported on this in detail as it was unfolding two years ago. This was an intimidation move which sent the message that if Russia made good on its threats to cut off oil and natural gas to Europe. (US/NATO has NO business interfering with Russia's oil/gas interests. This situation is all about manipulation and control by the worldwide crime syndicate in its efforts to seize control of ALL oil/gas and pipelines.)

At issue with Putin’s demands is the removal of a series of missile shields installed in Eastern Europe. Missile shields in Germany have been a point of contention for Russia in the past. The presence of a missile shield removes some of the elements of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) because it appears to Russia that NATO would believe that they can deliver a first strike and survive the retaliatory strike because of the shield. However, Russia does have some basis for concern. The US is back in Iraq with military personnel. It is not well-publicized but it is happening. I was told by this source that a missile shield along with tactical nuclear weapons are being/have been installed in Iraq. All the signals are there that the US plans for a first strike into Syria and/or Iran. Is this what Ashton Carter, Defense Secretary, meant when he said our children would be living in an incinerated world?

(NOTE: to those idiots who have been publishing in the dinar guru reports - the cabal is NOT dead! The cabal has NOT left this planet!  The cabal has NOT surrendered!  Tell your boogymen 'intel' sources to take a much needed permanent vacation!  The cabal is very much alive, and working feverously to create death and destruction of the entire planet, this time to include D and D of the united States.  Russia and other nations have had ENOUGH of the Wash DC crime syndicate.  WHEN ARE THE AMERICANS GOING TO HAVE ENOUGH?)

Later, Russia’s demands emanating from Eastern Europe in the aftermath of the Ukraine crisis, were expanded to Syria when Putin demanded that the US/CIA stop supplying ISIS/CIA with material support to use against the Syrian Army. Putin has now issued orders to his planes and troops that if they are threatened, they may respond with lethal force. That threat includes US military personnel. (NOTE: The US/CIA fabricated the claims about Asaad using gas on his population - it was the US/CIA that gassed the people. Hodges is giving you only a PART of the WHOLE story, and therefore not the TRUTH.)

As we already know, Putin terminated the plutonium processing agreement with the US for hostile action by Washington against Russia. This deal cannot be restarted until NATO forces are out of Eastern Europe. Thisi is important because this is tantamount to breaking off diplomatic relations with the US. This is often viewed as a precursor to war.

There are no shortage of places that World War III could commence. Is this why the German government told its citizens to get prepared for tough times ahead? The stark warning offered by the German government may have as much to do with World War III than it does with Deutsche Bank’s failure.

Conclusion

It is concerning that nobody is talking about the root cause of this entire conflict. It has to do with the Petrodollar and the fact that Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa (BRICS) are purchasing Iranian oil with gold. The BRICS are leading a movement away from the dollar being the World’s reserve currency. This is an act of war based upon past practice. This is a banker’s war, a war that will be fought on behalf of the Federal Reserve. 

I would love to see the Federal Reserve fail. However, if the BRICS are successful, this will mean the end of the dollar. Do you want to be able to drive to work next Monday and be able to afford to pay your rent or mortgage? The American people are in a catch – 22 and we are damned if we support the coming war and we are damned if we do not. (This has already been taken care of - the new US Treasury  currency, referred to as TRNs,  is supposedly in circulation and backed by gold. Of course, as is customary here in the US, no announcements have yet been made to inform the Americans.  Everything is always a secret, withheld from the

people. )

The timing of this report is very circumstantial in light of the fact that Russia has 40 million citizens underground at this moment practicing to survive a nuclear attack from the United States. Does anyone else believe that it is suspicious that Putin issues threat and ultimatums at this time? Some people close to me believe that if Russia is going to attack, it will be before civil defense drill is completed on October 7th (today).

This is a fluid report that will, undoubtedly, go through several revisions. However, the threat is real and should be taken seriously. Almost as important, do you have your preparations completed?

I will have updates as they occur. But to conclude, Putin has issued an ultimatum to withdraw military forces and equipment from Eastern Europe or risk being attacked.

Third Update: I have received word that the Russian embassy in Washington DC  has tweeted out a thinly veiled threat. I will be reporting on this later today on the website and on Youtube.

(NOTE: our 'intel' sources state that Putin does NOT want war; however, if the Wash DC / U.S.A. crime syndicate and NATO continue with their criminal actions, the war may well take place. It is NOT the Americans that Putin has issues with, but the U.S.A. crime syndicate and its allies  - NATO.  The united States will be annihilated and will NOT recover from this war.  The bear has had enough of the arrogance, thievery and untrustworthy actions/agreements of the cabal, and they are about to attempt to put a permanent end to them.)