7.14 Corruption of Law
Article 325 - Settlement (Birth) Certificate
A
Settlement Certificate, also known as a “
Birth Certificate” since the formation of Central Records and Registers in 1836 (
6&7Will.4 c.86) is an official
document,
possessing multiple legal functions and "states" under the central
presumption that those against whom such instruments are issued are a
form of “
property” and bonded servant (slave), to Western-Roman and private Banking interests, regardless of status of family or history.
Under Statutes and Policies promulgated from Westminster and other bodies, a Birth
Certificate,
fulfills multiple and distinct functions and states, depending upon its
recognition and activity at hand, including but not limited to:
(i)
Certificate of Title to Cestui Que Use of Person being recognition that the
State claims
ownership by virtue of the
Certificate itself and all the information contained on it, therefore proving a Cestui Que Vie
Trust in place and that the man or woman or new born to whom the
Certificate applies only has “beneficial use” of the name; and
(iii)
Certificate of Deposit and Bailment (Custody) being the recognition through the
terms used
to describe the father and mother that a transaction has taken place
and the new born is no longer “owned” by the parents but is in the
custody of the
State, with the new born now a
Thing, subject to the
Jurisdiction of the Courts, having being registered (enrolled); and
(iv)
Certificate of Second Class Citizenship under Cestui Que Use of Person being that the
Certificaterecognizes a new born not being a
Citizen, but a “second class”
citizen not having full control over their
body, or
mind, or name, or spirit all claimed through the morally repugnant, profane, sacrilegious and deceptive conduct of
public officials; and
(v)
Certificate of Bondage as Slave being the
certificate as
recognition of a man or woman or new born as a member of the poor, the
paupers, the infants, the idiots and lunatics, the “horned cattle”, the
beasts, the creatures, the humans, the dispossessed, the
insolvent debtors
and criminals and enemies of those who have created wholly mythical
religious and legal texts to justify their exclusive positions as
masters of a “planet of slaves”.
The term
Birth is a synonym of the Admiralty term
Berth from the late early 1600’s
meaning “a fixed address; or position on a ship; or room in which the ship’s
company mess resides; or a space for a
vessel to moor (
settle)”.
In
terms of the history of Birth Certificates,
Settlement Certi
ficates
and diminishing, tricking, deceiving, lying, seizing, condemning and
cursing free people as slaves, wards, infants, cattle, poor and
commodities:
(i) In 1535 (
27Hen.8 c.28) King Henry VIII of England and his Venetian/Magyar banking advisers seized the
property of the poor and
common farmers under the pretext they were “small religious estates”. By 1539 (
31Hen.8 c.13) he did the same for large religious estates. By 1540, (
32Hen.8 c.1), all
property was to be owned through “Estates” effectively being Welfare Funds granted by the
Crown to the
Benefit of use of Subjects with the most
common being Estates for the non wealthy now considered “Wards of the
Estate”. Then in 1545 (
37Hen.8 c.1) King Henry VIII reintroduced a title directly and solely connected to the slave
trade of Rome, abolished by emperors and forbidden under Christian law called the “Custos Rotulorum”
meaning literally
“Keeper of the Slave Rolls” into every county, to maintain records of
the Poor now as slaves. The same sacrilegious, immoral, ecclesiastically
unlawful positions continued into the 21st Century as connected with
Birth Certificates; and
(ii) In 1547 (
1Ed.6 c.3)
, Edward VI issued a new statute that did forbid people considered poor
from travelling, except for work, or from claiming their own time and
activities and whether or not to work. All people (except those members
of the ruling elite, particularly those non-Christian sects from Pisa,
Venice and parts of Spain responsible for wholly false religious and
legal texts) now declared slaves were either to be gainfully employed in
the service of some lord or master, to work to death, or if they were
found to be idle, or enjoying
life then
they were to be seized and permanently branded with a “V” and either
sold as a slave or exterminated. The only exception to the rule, were
those men who chose to dedicate themselves to support the status quo and
become educated and knowledgeable in the false texts and false
scriptures of the slave masters. This act was supposed to have been
repealed in 1549 (
3&4Ed.6 c.16). However, the act was then restored to full effect in 1572 (
14El. c.5) and through subsequent repeals of repeals, remains in force; and
(iii)
Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, a set of measures were introduced
which had the effect of accelerating the disenfranchisement of land
peasants into landless paupers. In 1589 (
31El c. 7)
peasants then required local parish permission to erect dwellings
whereas before the erection of a dwelling by a land peasant on their
lord's land was considered a "right". As a result, the ranks of the
landless poor, or "paupers" swelled as available to be press-ganged into
work; and
(iv)
To placate the overwhelming hostility against England as a hellhole of
slavery, exploitation and superstition, a new act was introduced in 1601
(
43El. c.2 and “secret version” as
43 El. c.3)
to begin to industrialize, hide and franchise slavery with the
introduction of “overseers” of the poor as the foremen over the slaves,
under a “cleric” of the parish and the renaming of children sold as sex
slaves and workers to be called “Apprentices”. Thus the Apprentiship
system was invented not to improve conditions, but to “rebrand” slavery
under the Non-Christian English-Venetian-Pisan model of commerce. The
act also introduced a new levy, collected by Parishes was called the
"Poor Rates" (now called "council taxes") against wealthy
property owners for their “rent” of use of the poor as slaves. This is the financial origin of Annuities 100 years later; and
(v) Under Charles II of England, the
concept of “Settlements” as plantations of working poor controlled by the Church of England was further refined in 1662 (
14Car.2 c.12) including for the first time the issuance of “
Settlement Certificates” equivalent to a “birth
certificate, passport and social
security” rolled into one
document. A
child's birthplace was its place of
settlement, unless its mother had a
settlement certificate from some other parish stating that the unborn
child was included on the
certificate. However from the age of 7 upward the
childcould
have been apprenticed and therefore “sold into servitude” for some rent
paid back to the church as “poor taxes”. The act also made it easier
for the “clearing of
common houses
of the poor” and for the first time made the definition of poor the
value of tenancy being a taxable value of less than £10 per year. The
act also modified the age of “emancipation” from
child slavery to adult slavery as the age of 16; and
(vi) Under the draconian and morally repugnant dictates of 1662 (
14Car.2 c.12), no one was allowed to move from town to town without the appropriate “
Settlement Certificate”. If a
person entered a parish in which he or she did not have official
settlement,
and seemed likely to become chargeable to the new parish, then an
examination would be made by the justices (or parish overseers). From
this examination on
oath, the justices would determine if that
person had
the means to sustain himself. The results of the examination were
documented in an Examination Paper. As a result of the examination the
intruder would then either be allowed to stay, or would be removed by
means of what was known as a Removal
Order, the origin of the modern equivalent of an “Eviction and Removal
Notice” when a
sheriff removes people from their home; and
(vii) In 1667 (
19Car.2 c.4) the
concept of
“workhouses” were formalized and licensed as being effectively the very
worst and hellish places where people considered “prisoners” could be
“legally” and effectively worked to death for the profit of the elite
pirates and thieves, under the full endorsement by the Church of
England. This is the act that invented the
concept of
“Employment” and an expansion of the highly profitable white slavery
business models of English aristocracy. Thus, people who were taken into
custody by virtue of being poor, were expected to work as well as live
in conditions as traumatic and evil as any in civilized history; and
(viii)
The abuse of poor prisoners through the “workhouses” employment model
was extremely profitable and a new act was required in 1670 (
22Car.2 c.18) to regulate the corporations “renting” of prisoners as “employees” for profit, particularly in the paying of their
accounts to the
Crown; and
(ix) Previous acts were continued and some made perpetual such as the controls over paperwork and “
Settlement Certificates” as the origin and
ancestor of Birth Certificates by James II in 1685 (
1J.2. c. 17) as one of the few acts that the ruling elite permitted to remain as an active Statute of Westminster under his reign; and
(x) Under William and Mary of Orange in 1691 (
3W&M c.11),
the acts of workhouses and abuse of the poor were continued and further
refined, with greater oversight on paperwork and accounting for poor
entering and leaving parishes, to prevent fraud by overseers and
corporations; and
(xi) In 1697 (
3W&M. c.11),
one of the more horrific of the wicked and morally repugnant acts of
Westminster was the introduction (in §2) of the “badge” of the poor with
the
letter “P” to be worn at
all times on the shoulder of the right sleeve. Furthermore, all
evidence as to “Jewish Badges” being introduced in Europe as early as
the 13th Century is wholly and completely false, as the term “jew” was
not revived until the 16th Century. Instead, the first examples of
badges as a stigma to status is most likely this act and subsequent acts
against the poor by banking and ruling elite who chose to identify
themselves as members of the same non-Christian
religioninvented in the 16th Century that claimed to be victims of the same barbarity. The use of the “P” as a
form of curse and stigma is the same model of modern passports for citizens listed as "P" (Paupers, Poor, Peasant, Prisoners,
Property, Peon) used today; and
(xii) In 1698 (
9&10W3 c.11) an act reinforced the measurement of the poor being one who does not have an annual
lease taxable
at ten pounds or more, making at the time more than 95% of the
population of England, Wales, Ireland and Scotland “poor”; and
(xiii) In 1713 (
12Ann. S.2 c.18), the extension of
Settlement Certificates as a
form of negotiable
Security was
introduced for the first time (and continues with Birth Certificates
today) whereby (§2) those born in a place but without a
Settlement Certificate (incl
uding
women and children), could be moved to a different location, such as a
commercial workhouse when the “cost” of such certificates were purchased
by a
corporation; and
(xiv) Due to the increase in the number of “poor”, in 1722 a new law was passed (
9Geo.1 c.7)
in which those who had been thrown out of their homes or had their land
seized by pirates and thieves operating with endorsement of Westminster
and who sought
relief from the Church to stay alive now had to “compete” to enter into a workhouse to
survive. Furthermore, the act expanded the ability for a wide variety of business owners to
contract with churchwardens for the rent and use of the poor as “indentured servants” and “apprentices”.
(xv) In 1733 (
6Geo.2 c.32),
one of the most inhumane and barbaric edicts in history was issued by
Westminster (and remains an underlying pillar of the slave system
today), whereby poor people who could not
purchase a
“license” to be considered married, would have their children deemed
“bastards” and such children could then be seized by Churchwardens and
“sold”. Thus the baby slave
trade was born and fully endorsed by the Church of England and British
Society; and
(xvi) In 1761 (
2Geo.3 c.22),
Westminster declared that all poor as mental “infants” and too stupid
to realize the underlying system of slavery and complicity of the
Christian Churches, were now to be cursed and doomed as “dead in law” by
their registration in the Bills of Mortality and the creation of the
“civil birth” rituals being rituals of death that continue today within
modern hospitals and registration of new born babies. This was further
reinforced with the act in 1767 (
7Geo.3 c.39) that poor children were to be registered and considered “dead in law”; and
(xvii) Beginning in 1773 with the Inclosure Act 1773 (
13Geo.3 c.81), followed by the Inclosure Consolidation Act 1801 (
41Geo.3 c.109), English Parliament effectively "privatized" massive amounts of
common land for the
benefit of
a few, causing huge numbers of land peasants to become "landless
paupers" and therefore in need of parish assistance. In America, this
caused massive rebellion as well as in Ireland and Scotland and
contributed to forming a Patriot militia leading to the "War of
Independence". Almost the entire Patriot milita were deceived, captured
and executed in New York (in 1777) under a deal between George
Washington of the United
Companyof Merchants Blue Army and General Cornwalis of the East India
Company Red Army. The Inclosure Acts are the foundation of Land Title as it is known today; and
(xviii) Because of the deliberate "legal" theft of land under parliamentary Inclosure
laws of the late 18th and early 19th Century, the number of paupers dramatically increased. This led to the most awful and cruel
laws being
introduced to deliver to an elite few, the slave labor force needed for
the industrial revolution through the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) (
5&6Will.4 c.76) which effectively stated that the poor could not receive any
benefitunless
they were constantly "employed" in a workhouse prison. Most
importantly, much of the inhuman, barbaric and wholly immoral and
sacriligeous framework of dictates and edicts of Westminster remained in
force and were not repealed by this act). Thus, despite international
treaties against slavery, the very worst slavery being "wage slavery" or
"lawful slavery" was born whereby men, women and children lived in
terrible conditions and were continued to be worked "to death"; and
(xix) In 1836, the Births and Deaths Registration Act (1836) (
6&7Will.4 c.86)
was introduced which for the first time created the General Register
Office and the requirement for uniform records of births, deaths and
marriages across the Empire by Municipal Councils and Unions of
Parishes. Thus on 1, July 1837, the Birth
Certificate was formed as the
successor of the
Settlement Certificate for
all "paupers" disenfranchised of their land birthright to be considered
lawful ("voluntary") slaves with benefits provided by the local parish /
region underwritten by the
Society of Lloyds as it is still today; and
(xx)
Beginning from 1871, further historic changes in the administration of
“vital statistics” such as birth certificates and death certificates
with the introduction of health districts or “sanitary districts”. The
Local Government Act of 1871 (
34&35Vict. c.70),
Public Health Act 1872 (
35&36Vict. c.79) and in 1874 (
37&38Vict. c.89) and the
Public Health Act 1875 (
38&39Vict. c.55) created a system of “districts” called Sanitary Districts governed by a Sanitary Authority responsible for various
public health
matters including mental health legally known as “sanity”. Two types of
Sanitary Districts were created being Urban and Rural. While the
sanitary districts were “abolished” in 1894 with the Local Government
Act of 1894 (
57&58Vict. c.73), the administration of the “poor” is still maintained in part under the
concept of district health boards of Guardians including magistrates and other “Justices of the Peace”; and
(xxi) In 1948, the National Assistance Act (
11&12Geo.6 c.29) was introduced and supposed to abolish the Poor
Laws.
However, many of the most draconian poor law acts were not repealed or
abolished as evidenced by the tables of repealed acts that miss key
acts, otherwise remaining with full force and effect.
Since 1990 under the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (WHO) by the Convention on the Rights of the
Child, the system of issuing birth certificates as
proof of a man or woman being a permanent member of the underclass has become an international system.
In respect of the adoption of the multiple functions of the use of the information and generic
form of a Birth
Certificatewithin present Western Roman Systems:
(ii)
There is no evidence that Bonds using the same information derived from
the birth register information uses the title “Birth
Certificate” (when it is most likely the term
Bond is used). Therefore, any presumptions that precisely the same
certificate is used for creating bonds is a gross error, when in
fact the real question is the use of the information; and
(iii) Ignorance in presuming the precise same
form of a Birth
Certificate is
used in all cases of applying the information is a major contributor to
permitting “plausible deniability” as to the use or misuse of such
information by governments.
In respect of the adoption of the Admiralty term “Birth” in relation to newborns:
(i) The historic
record of
Statutes of Westminster are a highly unreliable indicator as to the
origin of use of the word “Birth” in substitute for historic more
ancient and more
common terms in the English language such as nascence (from Latin
nasci being “born”), or filial, or kin or born. In
fact, the majority of European languages with poignant exception to English continue the tradition of using words descended from
nasci to indicate the arrival of a new born; and
(ii)
Westminster statutes indicate the term Birth being used to describe
newborns by the early 1700’s. However, this should be discounted as
almost certainly examples of deliberate fraud and corruption. Instead,
the most likely introduction of the term Birth, to distinguish from
Berth is by early 1800’s such as (
6&7Will.4 c.86) following the transfer of control of the registration of all “vessels” to Admiralty in 1795 (
35Geo.3 c.58) and reinforced in 1813 (
54Geo.3 c.151) and 1823 with (
4Geo.4 c.41).
In respect of Birth Certificates clearly being derived and dependent upon the history of acts concerning
SettlementCertifica
tes of the Poor and the commercial control of Admiralty:
(i) Any argument,
claim, judgment, edict, statement,
affidavit that denies the overwhelming
prima facie evidence that Birth Certificates are descended from and a variation of
Settlement Certificates is therefore irrational, unreasonable and in error and null and void from the beginning; and
(ii) Any
public official, or occupant of
public office that denies Birth Certificates are derived from
SettlementCertificates and the Poor
Laws therein is culpable of gross deceptive and misleading conduct.
The
surrender, return, rejection of a Birth
Certificate by definition of the Poor
Laws that remain in effect and including the law of Admiralty and
Settlement Certificates actually places the individual in greater moral danger, without any sensible advantage:
(i) A man or woman who has perfected their own
Will and Testament through the prescribed model of Voluntatem Et Testamentum is able to demonstrate a far
superior claim and position than any official or enforcement
officer under the Birth
Certificate Regime; and
(ii) Under the model of Voluntatem Et Testamentum, the Birth
Certificate is irrelevant as all persons are registered within the proper Rolls of the
Estate as
property of the
Estate; and
(iii) It could be reasonably argued that a man or woman who surrenders their Birth
Certificate,
demonstrates an act of complete stupidity and incompetence and
therefore subjects themselves to greater control as wards, idiots and
lunatics.
Under the limited
terms of
relief of those who possess
Settlement Certificate
s, the
holder of a Birth
Certificate in past periods was able, in limited circumstances, to use the Birth
Certificate as evidence of a right to maintenance and direction to discharge debts against the Cestui Que Vie
accounts, otherwise denied. In other words, the extremely limited circumstances by which a Birth
Certificate is converted into a
bond by the authorised
holder in Cestui Que Use:
(iii) The words to be included with the signature and the word Endorsement or Endorsed are “
Pay to the holderwithout recourse for all debts, duties, fines and legacies concerning account number (account number being the account listing the
debt)”; and
(iv) No amount is ever listed as part of the set-off and effective discharge. If an amount of
money is listed, then such an endorsement is void and may be construed as a deliberately false act with deeper consequences; and
(v) The
acceptance of such a
bond was extremely limited to certain cases in relation to
public debts (such as hospitals, taxes and
court fines). However, it is unclear in the collapse of any resemblance of law if any such
remedy remains permitted by the wholly
corporate model of broken government.
The existence of a Birth
Certificate is
prima facie evidence of the existence of one or more Cestui Que Vie
Trust. Therefore, any argument, or denial of such
fact is gross deceptive and misleading conduct at best, or incompetence and stupidity at worst.
The existence of Birth Certificates and the statutes that created them from
Settlement Certificates
to Admiralty based Birth Certificates is overwhelming and irrefutable
evidence of organized and systematic slavery, in complete contradiction
to all
laws claiming the abolition of slavery and servitude.
A fundamental flaw that remains within the
Settlement (Birth)
Certificate System for the
Roman Cult and its agents remains the
fact that a
Settlement Certificate is
proof that a man or woman must have been born on the land for the
certificate to have effect, regardless of convoluted subsequent presumptions of what the
certificate actually represents. If a man or woman was not born on the land somewhere a
certificate could not be issued. Therefore any rejection, or return of a Birth
Certificate serves as perfected evidence that a man or woman was born on the land and support to any
Affidavit of
Truth concern
ing their immutable rights from the
Divine Creator.
As
Settlement Certificates
and later Birth Certificates are solely and purposefully designed to
disenfranchise men and woman from their rightful inheritance through
voluntary enslavement and admission to being "paupers", the system of
Birth Certificates is wholly without legitimacy, a global system of
organized fraud and crime and without lawful effect.
As Birth Certificates and their use are a deliberate corruption of all forms of law, philosophy of law and
application of law, the system is reprobate, forbidden and never permitted to be revived.
The system of Live Borne Records which recognize the full rights of all men and women as equal and higher
order beings possessing sacred and immutable rights which can never be abrogated is a
superior system to Birth Certificates and can never be compared to the slavery system of Birth Certificates and
Settlement Certificates.
DO YOU 'GET' THE PICTURE HERE? ARE YOU READY TO PRESERVE YOUR 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS?
