By Anna Von Reitz
I recently got a "complaint" letter
from a reader who apparently got in trouble himself or had friends who
were "thrown in jail" as a result of using a Notice of Liability---- and
he wanted to let me know that a process I had recommended wasn't
working, etc.
There are two kinds of courts
typically at work in America. Both are foreign to us. American courts
have to be staffed and run by us, so until more people take up their
responsibility to self-govern, they are relatively rare.
There is the Territorial Court
System, meaning British Territorial United States Court System that
shouldn't even be addressing us, which uses British "Equity" Law and
there is the MUNICIPAL COURT SYSTEM that uses COMMERCIAL LAW, which is
used by the equally foreign MUNICIPAL UNITED STATES.
A Notice of Liability is a
commercial document to be used in commercial processes and commercial
courts recognize it the same way they would recognize a Bill of Lading
or an Invoice. It's a normal part of doing business in the commercial
realm and is in fact part of your DUTY to fully disclose and properly
inform. The reason you do Notices of Liability is not to threaten
anyone. It is to fully inform them of their liability in a matter that
is either harming you or likely to harm you.
No doubt you have all encountered
the concept of "plausible deniability" wherein terrible acts are
committed, but the person responsible says, "I didn't know!" ---? So a
Notice of Liability lets such people know and thereby holds them
accountable in advance for their actions. That is the value of a Notice
of Liability when going into a commercial court action.
In a commercial court setting,
properly composed and entered Notices of Liability can't be interpreted
as a "threat" and the examples that were posted on www.InPowerMovement.com --- at least at the time I wrote my article, were all properly executed and could not possibly get anyone in trouble.
You will note that the entire
discussion about Notices of Liability came up in the context of
addressing Smart Meters being installed by Public Utility companies,
which really should be a big clue to everyone that we are talking about
commercial operations and commercial courts and commercial processes
that are run through the MUNICIPAL COURTS.
Notices of Liability in the Territorial Court System are a completely different matter and NOT ADVISED.
British Equity Law is a supremely
evil thing, because it empowers the judge to act--- literally---- as the
King. This form of law came about as a result of polluting English
Common Law with Admiralty Law back in the 1750's. It gives the judges
vast "powers of discretion" to do whatever they want with little or no
reference to the written law or facts. They are able under "Equity Law"
to dispose of you and your assets as possessions of the King, with them
playing King.
This is convenient for the actual
King, because these sycophants rule in "his" favor and the favor of the
elites and the "government" over 97% of the time and if by chance they
do something that is unpopular enough to cause riots, the King can wash
his dainty hands and appear as the Peacemaker, when in fact this system
was created as an instrument of brutal despotism and arbitrary abuse of
power.
That's what you are dealing with in
the Territorial State of State Courts, and the best advice is to stay
out of them entirely. If you have your BC and your Certificate of
Assumed Name and Act of State claiming your birthright political status
on the public record and you bring that information forward, the
Territorial Courts aren't supposed to address you at all.
The Territorial Courts are operating
as "pirate vessels" dry-docked on our "shores" and they are
"press-ganging" American assets for British pockets, so it is paramount
for you to realize that if they can find a means of charging you they
will--- but they can only do so if you are acting in some capacity
within their jurisdiction.
They pull you into their
jurisdiction by "presuming" (mostly from the fact that you actually
showed up in their court) that you are a (Territorial) United States
Citizen and acting in that capacity. If so, they can throw the book at
you, and they do so with gusto. That's why it is so important to
properly identify yourself as a non-citizen non-combatant civilian owed
the Law of Peace and that you were not acting in the capacity of a
Territorial Citizen at the time whatever you are charged with took place
and aren't acting in that capacity in coming to the court.
These courts have a strictly defined
12 mile radius of operations, so if you stay outside that area they are
technically not able to arrest you and I generally advise people to
conduct all business that may be necessary with these courts via the
mail. They have no right to address you, but you do have a duty to
properly identify yourself and your activities as not being subject to
their court.
That these foreign courts have been
allowed to run rampant on American soil is a terrible travesty that you
can hold the politicians responsible for--- being careful not to let
them misidentify you as a "citizen" either. I went so far as to send a
Registered Letter to the entire Alaska Congressional Delegation making
it clear that I am not acting in the capacity of a municipal or
territorial citizen and they are not authorized to presume upon or
represent me, but are instead obligated to do my bidding.
And then of course I told them
exactly what I required. None of them ever replied and I did not expect
them to. They aren't supposed to address us. That's why they fall
silent. When you properly identify yourself they know you are not "one
of them" and they shuffle off because you are not one of their
Territorial or Municipal constituents. You are, however, one of their
employers and it is when you act in that capacity that they are obliged
to obey.
Once you start paying attention and
noticing these things the logic of it all clicks into place. Until
then, be aware that commercial documents belong only in commercial court
actions and be aware that the British Equity judges and prosecutors are
from the Territorial United States (think Puerto Rico and Guam) and
shouldn't even be addressing you at all.
----------------------------
See this article and over 800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
1 comment:
They all asked for a process. And then when you tell them that there is no process they get mad and act like you are keeping a secret. But if you tell them a process works the first time or that it works until it doesn't they still act like you lied.
None of them have done the homework they don't have a Black's Law Dictionary they haven't been to court they don't know what words mean they know nothing about personal jurisdiction of subject matter jurisdiction and when they get in trouble they want to run to a piece of paper and think that it will save them.
The piece of paper get you attention. Once you get their attention then comes the test. There is no process to help you pass the test. And the last fact is when they put a contract in front of you you easily sign it. So all of these folks that went to jail ask them what their signature look like on the contract they were given that they would totally unaware they were accepting an offer to sit in jail. There's no process for the way the Mind thinks
Post a Comment