A stunning challenge has been issued in the argument over Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president, and it comes from a lead investigator for Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Maricopa County, Ariz.
Arpaio’s team of volunteer professional law enforcement officers and attorneys concluded after a six-month investigation that there is probable cause that forgery and fraud were committed in the process through which Obama released a “Certificate of Live Birth” image at the White House last year.
Arpaio has assured those interested that the investigation is continuing and earlier suggested that the appropriate avenue might be for Congress to begin an investigation.
The challenge came from lead investigator Mike Zullo, who was interviewed by the CBS Channel 5 affiliate in Phoenix. Reporter Heather Moore pointed out that it was Zullo’s name and face that was being attached to the investigative report, and she asked how comfortable was he making the allegations.
“Very comfortable,” he said, citing experts the investigators consulted during their 2,200 hours of work. “You can build the document. You can’t do that if you scan [a document],”
NOTE: In case you missed the news conference of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s “Cold Case Posse,” you can view it here.
Then she asks what he would say to “naysayers” who claim the allegations are just a bunch of “B.S.”
“Prove it,” he said. “We did.”
He added, “We proved our point. That document’s created.”
Specifically, he said the image that was released by Obama never was an original hard copy that was scanned, as the White House described. It was instead, he said, an idea created in a computer.
The CBS affiliate report already has had more than half a million views, meaning that the response the station got from the White House on the issue, a reference to a year-old statement by Obama that such issues are “side shows,” may not be sufficient much longer.
Arpaio, at his original news conference announcing the results, said he was not accusing Obama of any crime.
But he said the evidence uncovered shows “violations of the law. We’re investigating those crimes.”
At that time, the posse confirmed it has identified at least one person of interest in the alleged forgery of Obama’s birth certificate.
In fact, Zullo reported, “We have identified the computer manufacturer, [and] where that document resided 20 minutes before it was uploaded onto the White House website.”
The issue of Obama’s birth certificate centers on his eligibility to be president, since the Constitution requires that a president be a “natural-born citizen.”
The term is not defined in the Constitution, but at the time the document was written, many experts believe it referred to the offspring of two citizens of the country. Some critics say the place of birth is irrelevant, since Obama has written that Barack Obama Sr., his father, never was a U.S. citizen.
The posse also said evidence suggests the Hawaii Department of Health has engaged in a systematic effort to hide from public inspection any original 1961 birth records it may have in its possession.
Arpaio launched the investigation at the request of 250 of his constituents. He assigned it to independent volunteers so that taxpayers would bear none of the costs of the investigation.
Previous stories:
1 comment:
Sheriff Joe's posse has said that a physical copy of Obama's longf-rm birth certificate does not exist. It has said that the paper documents that Obama had handed around in the White House press room were not the actual official physical copies of the document itself but forgeries made from the software version of the long-form, apparently with a forged seal attached. That is what they claim.
Is there a way to determine whether or not this is true? Yes, of course there is.
It is to go to the White House, say that you are a law officer and ask to see the document that was passed around in the White House press room and examine it.
Obviously, the White House can refuse to show it to you. And in fact, if the physical document was in fact forged, they would do exactly that.
But, asking to see the document and getting turned down tells you something. It indicates that the White House might have something to hide.
So, a very important question to ask is why the posse did not ask to see the physical document that they claim is forged. The fact that the White House might turn down the request is not a valid explanation. The fact that if the White House indeed turned down the request would be suspicious in itself. So either the posse was too stupid to ask or did not know that asking to see a document that you claim is forged is standard practice in a forgery investigation. Or, it had a real reason for not asking.
What could the real reason be?
One answer could be that they want to keep on demanding the original birth certificate from Hawaii's files. But, if so, that is just part of their ruse because they KNOW that the regulations in Hawaii do not permit the DOH to show copies of it to anyone other than those on the state's list of eligible relatives and others, and the regulations do not allow the original in the files to be removed or shown to anyone outside of the Hawaii government (and probably not to all of them either). Focusing your demands on something that you cannot get keeps the story alive. Focusing attention on a document that you could get if you asked for it doesn't keep the story alive. In fact, if they do give you the document, and you take it to really impartial document forensic specialists, the story ends right there.
So, the question still nags: Why didn't they ask to see the physical copy that they say was forged? And the answer comes back: Because they are not being honest about really investigating. IF they were really investigating they would have asked to see the document that was passed around. Since they did not do this, they are not really investigating. And, if they are not really investigating, what are they doing?
Post a Comment