If this was in place ---- WOW!
http://www.4shared.com/office/JbaZBeH0/Missing_13th_report.html
"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."
5 comments:
http://www.amendment-13.org/ This is a good website on this information. TONA Research Committee - The Original Thirteenth Article of Amendments
So what would happens to those American citizens lucky enough to actually hold noble titles either because of dual citizenship or by right of inhertance? Are you proposing to force them to choose either their US citizenship or or their noble titles? I would venture to say that most of them don't hold public office. Stripping of of their titles is no different than the dark cabal stealing their money and gold which is rightfully theirs. Case in point, would you force the Kennedy clan to give up their Vatican Prince/Princess titles? It's one thing to require those with noble titles to not be holding public office or work in any branch/ department of the government. It's quite another thing to force people in this country to give up part of their hertiage in cause of retribution. I would really like to hear your response to this.....
The fact is that that many attroneys are in office from the attorneys themselves as officers of the court to judges all the way up to senators, they are called esquires and just a little looking will tell you that esquire is a title given by the crown. My belief is that the war of 1812 was at least in part started to destroy the evidence held in the US capitol of ratification of the 13th Ammendment. This ammendment is crucial to the our countries survival, these peple sign an oath of alegeiance to the crown. I have personally seem one of these for the governor of my state, it was found in an office in Canada
The amendment is clear. ....Allegiance to one country and only one. .....If allegiance is an issue, they should seek refuge elsewhere!
Without the amendment, people will pledge allegiance to a flag rather than to a country.
Flag never did anything for the people, just sit on a pole, at least a country has many people that can join in that allegiance.
Folks don't know what they want or believe anymore. When we learn the legal definitions of these things, then it will matter, AND the 13th Amendment existed before US Citizens existed, so what's the use of all these US Citizens wanting access to something that is out of their reach? A US Citizen, ie person under statute, has no rights like the free People did when ther was Common Law and the Rule of Law. Yet again, Trusts did exist back then but weren't as prevalent where they would create one for us in infancy and use our footprint as the 'seal' the Trust. Courts won't let you in barefoot, 'Do not suffer my feet to be moved'. Their 'legal fiction' person, has no feed nor hands, nor soul. Man is that Creator of the legal fiction.
You have rights before they were written.
That's what hold most of us back. We think a piece of paper will give us what we have by Divine right, and as long as you fuss over that paper, be it the Constitution or the UCC, they know you don't know.
Post a Comment