UN TROOPS TO KILL AMERICANS WHO WON'T GIVE UP THEIR GUNS
There is a crisis coming. A false flag of epic proportions. Trump will provide the background and the pretext. Gun confiscation, by the UN, will be taking place on US soil. It was practiced in New Orleans in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. They will show up at 3AM, kick in your door, seize your gun and kill you if you offer any kind of resistance. Follow the progression.
The UN will be the enforcement agency. Why do you think that Quayle, Hagmann and Hodges have talking to you about foreign troops training on our soil?
Don’t let this man take your gun.
He wants a third term.
We have been down this road before.
TROOPS ORDERED TO KILL ALL AMERICANS
WHO DO NOT TURN IN THEIR GUNS
Published on Jul 16, 2012
http://www.infowars.com/un-gun-grab-f...
http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/fr...
http://www.infowars.com/army-manual-o...
http://www.prisonplanet.com/army-cour...
"Complete disarmament" of the American people
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.comMonday, July 16, 2012
http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/fr...
http://www.infowars.com/army-manual-o...
http://www.prisonplanet.com/army-cour...
"Complete disarmament" of the American people
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.comMonday, July 16, 2012
The UN Arms Trade Treaty that has been
identified by observers as a flagrant threat to the second amendment and which
Barack Obama is determined to sign has its roots in a 1961 State Department
memorandum which explains how the United Nations will oversee "complete
disarmament" of the American people under the ruse of preventing war. The
UN Arms Treaty has caused so much controversy because it outlines a plan to
target "all types of conventional weapons, notably including small arms
and light weapons," according to Forbes' Larry Bell. Former
US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton also warns that the agreement "is
trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms
trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real agenda here is
domestic firearms control."
A letter sent last month by 130 Republican House members to President Obama argued that the treaty should be rejected because it infringes on the "fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms". The letter adds that "...the U.N.'s actions to date indicate that the ATT is likely to pose significant threats to our national security, foreign policy, and economic interests as well as our constitutional rights." Using the rhetoric of the threat post by terrorists, insurgents and "international crime syndicates," the UN is busy trying to imply that all weapons are somehow involved in illegal activity on a global scale and should therefore be controlled and regulated by a global authority. This is precisely the same language used in a 1961 U.S. State Department briefing which outlined a long term agenda to carry out a "Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World." Invoking the threat of nuclear warfare, the document spells out a plan to create a "United Nations Peace Force" that would "enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds." While the document initially focuses on scrapping nuclear weapons, it later makes it clear that the only groups allowed to own weapons of any kind would be governing authorities, "for the purpose of maintaining internal order," and the UN "peacekeeping" force itself, which would require "agreed manpower." "The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes," states the document. While the memorandum outlines a broader mandate to destroy national sovereignty, eviscerate national armies and institute the UN as the planet's supreme authority with a world army, the document serves as a stark reminder that the plan for the United Nations to oversee the abolition of the second amendment has been in the works for decades.
As Bell points out in his Forbes article, the threat of the Obama administration relying on a UN treaty to do what successive administrations have tried but failed to accomplish -- taking a huge bite out of the second amendment -- is by no means far fetched. After all, a plethora of UN treaties and international agreements have already stripped the United States of its sovereignty and its power to decide its own laws. The power to authorize U.S. involvement in wars and conflicts has now been almost completely stripped from Congress and handed to the United Nations.
A letter sent last month by 130 Republican House members to President Obama argued that the treaty should be rejected because it infringes on the "fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms". The letter adds that "...the U.N.'s actions to date indicate that the ATT is likely to pose significant threats to our national security, foreign policy, and economic interests as well as our constitutional rights." Using the rhetoric of the threat post by terrorists, insurgents and "international crime syndicates," the UN is busy trying to imply that all weapons are somehow involved in illegal activity on a global scale and should therefore be controlled and regulated by a global authority. This is precisely the same language used in a 1961 U.S. State Department briefing which outlined a long term agenda to carry out a "Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World." Invoking the threat of nuclear warfare, the document spells out a plan to create a "United Nations Peace Force" that would "enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds." While the document initially focuses on scrapping nuclear weapons, it later makes it clear that the only groups allowed to own weapons of any kind would be governing authorities, "for the purpose of maintaining internal order," and the UN "peacekeeping" force itself, which would require "agreed manpower." "The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes," states the document. While the memorandum outlines a broader mandate to destroy national sovereignty, eviscerate national armies and institute the UN as the planet's supreme authority with a world army, the document serves as a stark reminder that the plan for the United Nations to oversee the abolition of the second amendment has been in the works for decades.
As Bell points out in his Forbes article, the threat of the Obama administration relying on a UN treaty to do what successive administrations have tried but failed to accomplish -- taking a huge bite out of the second amendment -- is by no means far fetched. After all, a plethora of UN treaties and international agreements have already stripped the United States of its sovereignty and its power to decide its own laws. The power to authorize U.S. involvement in wars and conflicts has now been almost completely stripped from Congress and handed to the United Nations.
************************
US State Department Memo validates all claims in this article.
This is where millions of you could spend your last days.
http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2016/03/13/un-troops-to-kill-americans-who-wont-give-up-their-guns/
AMERICA - GET THE HE*L OUT OF THE UNITED NATIONS AND NATO - GET THE UNITED NATIONS OFF OUR SOIL PERMANENTLY. THEY ARE NOT OUR ALLIES NOR ARE THEY OUR FRIENDS. THE U.S.A. MILITARY WAS TURNED OVER TO NATO - IT IS NOT 'OUR' MILITARY AND IS WORKING AGAINST AMERICANS. THIS ARRANGEMENT IS THANKS TO THE CRIMINAL CABAL HEADQUARTERED IN WASHINGTON DC, RUN BY ENEMIES OF AMERICANS - EITHER ARREST THESE
TRAITORS, KILL THEM OR RUN THEM OUT OF AMERICA ONCE AND FOR ALL. THEIR PLAN IS TO KILL ALL OF US - NOTE THE TOXIC CHEMTRAILS, WATER, GMOD'D CROPS, VACCINES, MOBILE CREMATORIUMS, FEMA CAMPS AND A MASSIVE INFLUX OF MUSLIM JIHADISTS. WHAT MORE PROOF DO YOU NEED TO TAKE ACTION BEFORE WE ARE BEYOND THE POINT OF OUR ABILITY TO DEFEND OURSELVES?
6 comments:
Molon Labe.
Yes! NATO TROOPS, YOU HAD BETTER PUT YOUR BIG BOY BRITCHES ON!!!
Dido… Molon Labe. A treaty is a contract between two parties. Can you say pirates to the self destructive? They might as well stamp idiot on their foreheads.
Marie and Slaveman: Popeye and I love you two patriots and warriors!!!! Consider yourselves duly appointed partners with this website!!!!
Put this on FACEBOOK for all the entertainers to see how this country is really being "pacified" by their inactivity to speak louder and louder for those deaf persons will become aware that the end of their compliance is now. All the social medias need this one to get the point: we are the Enemy by the Trading with the Enemy Act of March 9, 1933 by FDR et al.
Well...thank you Olive Oyl. I am honored.
Post a Comment