Rob Dew Interview With Former IRS Criminal Investigation Division Special Agent Joe Banister
Home Page
Home Page
Joe has been fighting the treason and fraud of the IRS for many years Wikipedia you can listen to his interviews here.
The Agent For Truth Interview
To continue reading this article, Supreme Court proofs and interviews click the READ MORE link on the left below this post.
PROCLAMATION
NOTICE
AND DEMAND
All Originals held for Litigation
Held Under Private Registered Indemnity Bond
Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents, Notice to Agents is Notice to
Principals
Two Maxims of
Law
• A piratis et latronibus capta
dominium non mutant.
Things captured
by pirates or robbers do not change their ownership.
• A piratis aut latronibus capti liberi
permanent.
Those captured
by pirates or robbers remain free.
“BY DECREE
YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED TO CEASE AND DESIST ALL FRAUDS, INLAND PIRACY AND
CRIMINAL ACTIONS AGAINST US! TO CEASE AND DESIST ALL ACTIONS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO
OUR SOVEREIGN LIVES, LIBERTIES, FREEDOMS, RIGHTS, MOVEMENTS AND
OWNERSHIPS.
TO RETURN
EXPEDIENTLY ALL THAT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ITS AGENCIES, THE
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE AND ITS AGENCIES AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND ITS
AGENCIES, THAT WHICH THEY HAVE EXTORTED FROM OUR WAGES, OUR LANDS, OUR TITLES,
OUR REAL, PRIVATE AND PERSONAL PROPERTIES, INCLUDING THIS LATEST EXTORTION OF
OUR WAGES OF $6,070.66, WHICH IS ALL AN EXCHANGE OF OUR LABOR, AND IS OVER AND
ABOVE THE THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS WHICH ARE EXTORTED FROM OUR PAY CHECKS EVERY
YEAR BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE AND STATE OF
CALIFORNIA.
TO RESTORE
US WHOLE FROM ALL THE FRAUDULENT MORTGAGES AND THE FRAUDULENT FORECLOSURE OF
OUR REAL PROPERTY AT STREET, CALIFORNIA BY GMAC AND THE BANKS, ON ALL TRUSTS, BONDS AND SO
FORTH THAT THESE CORPORATIONS AND THEIR AGENCIES AND AGENTS HAVE CREATED
WITHOUT OUR CONCENT. I.E. BIRTH REGESTRY, SOCIAL SECURITY, INSURANCE BONDS,
LICENSES, TRUSTS, BONDS AND ALL OTHER CREATIONS USING OUR IDENTITIES AS FICTIOUS
NAMES AGAINST OUR WILL AND KNOWLEDGE.
ALL OTHER SYMBOLISM, GRAMMER, LANGUAGE, REQUIREMENTS, DEMANDS,
STATUTES, CODES, CLAIMS OF ENFORCEMENTS, ETC., TO DECEIVE, OR FORCE PERFORMANCE UPON US BY ALL AGENCIES AND AGENTS OF THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE AND THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA ARE IRRELEVANT TOWARD WE THE PEOPLE. THERE IS NO JURISDICTION OR
AUTHORITY OF THESE CORPORATIONS, AGENCIES AND AGENTS, TO CREATE OR ENFORCE ANY
ACTIONS AGAINST WE THE PEOPLE. THE POWER AND AUTHORITY IS IN THE POSSESSION OF
WE THE PEOPLE. WE ARE LIVING SOULS, ALIVE ON THE LAND AND SOIL OF AMERICA, NOT
VESSELS, NOT DEAD AT SEA.
YOU WILL
HONOR THIS NOTICE AND DEMAND, OUR NOTICE OF PARAMOUNT CLAIM, OUR POA, OUR FEE SCHEDULE, OUR REVOCATIONS OF ELECTION AND OUR
MANDATORY NOTICES. WE ARE OWED THE LAW OF PEACE, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
PAMPHLET 27-161-1, FROM ALL TERRITORIAL AND MUNICIPAL OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
WHO OTHER WISE HAVE NO PERMISSION TO APPROACH OR ADDRESS US.
YOU ARE ALL
PART OF THE SAME WEB OF CORRUPTION, YOUR CONTINUED ACTIONS ESTABLISHES PROOF.
YOU ARE TO DISCONTINUE YOUR DISHONOR WITH UNCLEAN HANDS UPON US.”
RE: California
Franchise Tax Board: Notice Number: 01-3146071-083018, Improper Venue, fictious
name:
RE: California
Franchise Tax Board: Order Number 625269059114214533,
Improper Venue, fictious name:
RE: Notice Number: 01-3146071-083018; To respond to, line 3: PROOF
By this Edict: PROOF has been established,
there is no jurisdiction or requirement to file a tax return to STATE or
FEDERAL corporations, de facto assumed governments or their agencies or agents.
There are no laws, jurisdiction or requirements to force performance upon We
The People. This is but a drop in the bucket of the mounting evidence piling up
exposing the truth of the atrocities committed not just against America and her
people, but the entire World.
Citizenship cannot be forced upon
anyone without their consent. Since the living souls in America are not
citizens of your foreign corporations and have no voice through the voting
franchise in the adoption of the 14th amendment of your private
corporate constitution, no consent has been given. Thus, there is no evidence
that citizenship was accepted or even wanted by all Americans in this country
to the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA corporations.
Non-citizens of your foreign corporations are not subject to your domestic laws
known as statutes, codes, procedures, etc., civil or criminal, of this country,
thus all non-citizens of the foreign corporations calling themselves “THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” and “STATE OF CALIFORNIA”, being in and of themselves
de-facto forms of assumed government services and all of its franchises,
subsidiaries, agents, including but not limited to: “STATE OF”, departments,
courts, etc., no power has been given them by the people for the people that
are born on the land and soil of this country known as AMERICA. i.e. no staff
of a corporation or subsidiaries’ has any power given to them by We the People
to create or enforce laws or any codes, statues procedures, etc., and have not been
given to them by the fully informed We the People, and We the People are not
subject to the domestic laws known as statutes, codes, etc., thereby we enjoy immunity from all
corporations fraudulently calling themselves a government and their agents, and
are afforded the same immunity as those of visiting foreign diplomats and their
families.
As American Nationals born on the
land and soil of America we are not 14th amendment citizen slaves of
the foreign for profit private corporations calling themselves “THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA” and “STATE OF CALIFORNIA”. Case in point all corporations
and franchises, courts etc. use all upper-case letters in their titles. i.e. All
assumed government office’s, courts, departments, agents, actors, principals and
departments of their franchises, use an all upper-case word, name and/or title which
are dead things, i.e. an all upper-case block work on a piece of paper, etc.,
such as a birth registration, a bond, a negotiable instrument, licenses,
fictitious names, and so on are a fraud and fraud vitiates all.
It is the locus of the offense
which determines jurisdiction, not the offense committed. People v. Godfrey
(Cir.1880), 17 Johns, 225, 223 (N.Y. 1819)
Definition: lo·cus (l½“k…s) n.,
1. A locality; a place.
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 8thed.,
pg. 2287 – “The omission of the Christian name by either plaintiff or defendant
in a legal process prevents the court from
acquiring jurisdiction, …”
Gregg’s Manual of English: “A
name spelled in all capital letters or a name initialed, is not a proper noun
denoting a specific person, but is a fictitious
name, or a name of a dead person,
or a nom de guerre.”
“Complaint must identify at least
one plaintiff by true name; otherwise no action has been commenced.”
Roe v New York (1970, SD NY) 49 FRD 279, 14 FR Serv 2d 437, 8 ALR Fed 670.
(The reasoning behind a true name
is that neither a State, nor the United States, can pick up a pencil or sneeze,
being nothing more than a “piece of
paper”. They cannot, therefore,
assume the liability of actions nor write a complaint. All activities
carried on by governmental agencies are carried out by its agents and actors.)
The Supreme Court case, Monroe
Cattle Co. v. Becker, 147 U.S. 47 (1893) says: Defendant was impleaded by the
name of A. W. Becker. Initials are no legal part of a name, the authorities
holding the full Christian name to be essential. Wilson v. Shannon, 6 Ark. 196;
Norris v. Graves, 4 Strob. 32; Seely v. Boon, 1 N. J. Law, 138; Chappell v.
Proctor, Harp. 49; Kinnersley v. Knott, 7 C. B. 980; Turner v. Fitt, 3 C. B.
701; Oakley v. Pegler, (Neb .) 46 N. W. Rep. 920; Knox v. Starks, 4 Minn. 20,
(Gil. 7 Kenyon v. Semon, (Minn.) 45 N. W. Rep. 10; Beggs v. Wellman, 82 Ala.
391, 2 South. Rep. 877; Nash v. Collier, 5 Dowl. & L. 341; Fewlass v.
Abbott, 28 Mich. 270.
The United States Government
Printing Office Style Manual clearly defines the rules of grammar for recording
of a proper noun in Chapter 3.2, Capitalization. “Proper nouns are capitalized [examples
given] Rome, Brussels, John Macadam, Macadam family, Italy, and
Anglo-Saxon.” It further defines, in
Chapter 11.7, that “Names of vessels
are quoted in matter printed in other than lower case roman…[examples given
are] LUSITANIA [or] Lusitania.”
Black’s Law Dictionary “Fictitious Name“: “A counterfeit,
alias, feigned, or pretended name taken by a person, differing in some
essential particular from his true name (consisting of Christian name and
patronymic), with the implication that it is meant to deceive or mislead.”
Oxford Dictionary:
“nom“: Used in expressions
denoting a pseudonym, a false or assumed name.
“Nom de guerre“: War name. A name
assumed by or assigned to a person engaged in some action or enterprise.
“Guerre“: War, and as a verb, to
wage war.
The U.S. Government Style Manual,
Chapter 3 requires only the names of corporate
and other fictional entities, or
those serving in corporate capacities to be in all capitalized letters. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-STYLEMANUAL-2008/content-detail.html
Fictitious names exist for a
purpose. Fictions are invented to give court’s
jurisdiction. Snider v. Newell 44 SE 354.
This nation was not set up as a
democracy and was never intended to become one. It was established as a
constitutional republic, a constitution is created to limit a governing body,
not to enslave the people of a country and the intent was clear that it would remain
a limited republic form of governance. All of the Republican form of governments
and the offices thereof are still enforceable, but are not being utilized due
to the deliberate intent to deceive by “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” and “THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA”, by not disclosing the truth of what the federal and state
corporations have done to this country and her people. “Fraud vitiates ALL”
When someone has something for
which they’ve worked and which they’ve earned, they have an inherent Right to
keep it and dispose of it as they may choose. When someone else comes along and
just takes it by any means what so ever, that is called theft! When someone
else comes along and obtains it by threats, fraud, intimidation, etc., that’s
called extortion. And when someone else claiming to be an agent of a
government, well the labels don’t change. Here we will add a few more labels
such as inland piracy, treason, terrorism, fraud, RICO, securities fraud, etc.
Government is a fiction, it is an
artificial mechanism or device created and employed by living souls to
facilitate social, commercial intercourse. Government, being a fictional
entity, has nothing of its own. That reality must be supplied by real people.
When government gives something to someone, it must first take that something
from someone else.
color of law https://law.academic.ru/629/color_of_law
The conduct of a police officer,
judge, or another person clothed with governmental authority that, although it
superficially appears to be within the individual's lawful power, is actually
in contravention of the law. For example, a police officer who makes a false
arrest while on duty, or while off duty but when they are wearing a uniform or
badge, is acting under color of law. In some circumstances, the phrase also
applies to the conduct of private individuals that is specifically authorized
or approved by a statute. Depriving a person of his or her federal civil rights
under color of law is, in and of itself, a federal crime and a ground for a
cause of action. Also called under color of law.
If the conduct violates a federal
civil right or criminal law, it is also called state action.
See also color of title.
Color of Law and Legal
Definition https://definitions.uslegal.com/c/color-of-law/
Color of law refers to an act
done under the appearance of legal authorization, when in fact, no such right
existed. It applies when a person is acting under real or apparent government
authority. The term is used in the federal Civil Rights Act, which gives
citizens the right to sue government officials and their agents who use their
authority to violate rights guaranteed by federal law.
The following is from the Civil Rights Act:
"Every person who, under
color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or
Territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United
States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of
any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws,
shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or
other proper proceeding for redress."
Acting under color of [state] law
is misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only
because the wrongdoer is clothed with the authority of state law Thompson v.
Zirkle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77654 (N.D. Ind. Oct. 17, 2007)
McCain
minority staff director Henry Kerner to IRS official Lois Lerner and other IRS
officials: “the solution is to audit so many that it becomes financially
ruinous”
RIGHTS THAT
CANNOT BE TAKEN AWAY.
We are NOT U.S. CITIZENS
STATUTES ARE
NOT LAW – TO BE CONVICTED UNDER A STATUTE YOU MUST HAVE MY CONSENT.
We do NOT GIVE OUR CONSENT EVER. We are NOT U.S. CITIZENS, i.e. We are
living Souls and not a dead entity written in all upper-case letters on a piece
of paper or bond paper being claimed as a vessel owned by another living or
dead entity.
A “STATUTE” is NOT a law! Flournoy v. First National Bank of
Shreveport, 197 LA 1057. 3 So.2d 244, 248.
A “CODE” is NOT a law! In Re Self v. Rhay, Wn 2d 261, in point
of fact in law.
A concurrent or “joint resolution
of legislature is NOT “Law”. Koenig v.
Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N.E. 705, 707;
Ward v. State, 176 OKL. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash. 2d 43, 110, P.2d 162, 165).
STATUTE. Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition. The
written will of the legislature, solemnly expressed according to the forms
prescribed in the constitution; an act of the legislature.
U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION – The
common law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land, the codes, rules,
regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law”. Self v.
Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261.
U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION – ALL codes, rules, and regulations are for
government authorities ONLY, not human/Creators in accordance with God’s Laws.
All codes, rules and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due
process…” Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d, 1344,
1348 (1985).
Supreme Court 1796- This decision has never been overturned:
United States Supreme Court Decision from 1796- [Cruden v. Neale, 2
N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E.] "There, every man is independent of all laws,
except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed
by his fellowman without his consent."
“There are NO Judicial Courts in America and have not been since 1789.
“Judges” do NOT enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce
Statutes and Codes. FRC v. GE, 281 U.S. 464 Keller v. Potomac Elec. Co., 261
U.S. 428 1 Stat. 138-178”
“There have NOT been any “Judges” in America since 1789. There have
only been Administrators. FRC v. GE, 281 U.S. 464 Keller v. Potomac Elec. Co.,
261 U.S. 428 1 Stat. 138-178”
“The Supreme Court has warned, “Because of what appears to be Lawful
commands [Statutory Rules, Regulations and -codes–ordinances- and Restrictions]
on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be
law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance…
[deceptive practices, constructive fraud, barratry, legal plunder, conversion,
and malicious prosecution in inferior administrative State courts].” (United
States v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187, 76 S.Ct. 281, 100 L.Ed. 185 (1956);”
“The Common Law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land. The
codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law.” (Self v.
Rhay, 61 Wn 2d 261), They are the law of government for internal regulation,
not the law of man, in his separate but equal station and natural state, a
sovereign foreign with respect to government generally.
“A concurrent or ‘joint resolution’ of legislature is not “Law,”
(Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N. E. 705, 707; Ward v State, 176 Okl. 368,
56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162,
165).
All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only,
not human/Creators in accord with God’s Laws. “All codes, rules, and
regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process of Law..”(Rodriques v.
Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)); …lacking
due process of law, in that they are ‘void for ambiguity’ in their failure to
specify the statutes’ applicability to ‘natural persons,’ otherwise depriving
the same of fair notice, as their construction by definition of terms aptly
identifies the applicability of such statutes to “artificial or fictional
corporate entities or ‘persons’, creatures of statute, or those by contract
employed as agents or representatives, departmental subdivisions, offices,
officers, and property of the government, but not the ‘Natural Person’ or
American citizen Immune from such jurisdiction of legalism.”
“A “Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport,
197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248),
A “Code’ or Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of
Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248),”
“A “Code’ is not a Law,” (In Re Self v Rhay Wn 2d 261), in point of
fact in Law).”
The added and revised California constitution use by THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA and its agents, are using codes to force extortion levies on all
Californians see this link:
As stated above all statutes, codes,
procedures etc., by any corporations are not the laws of the land and are not
enforceable upon the people of this nation. Only We the People have the power
to create and enforce law and We the People have not given over our rights or
power to foreign agents or entities.
There is no warrant in law for such a holding. Gould v. Gould, 245 U.S.
151, at p. 153, 38 S.Ct. 53, 62 L.Ed. 211. In 51 American Jurisprudence,
"Taxation", Sec. 316, "Strict or Liberal Construction",
supported by a great wealth of authority, it is said:
'Although it is sometimes broadly stated either that tax laws are to be
strictly construed or, on the other hand, that such enactments are to be
liberally construed, this apparent conflict of opinion can be reconciled if it
is borne in mind that the correct rule appears to be that where the intent of
meaning of tax statutes, or statutes levying taxes, is doubtful, they are,
unless a contrary legislative intention appears, to be construed most strongly
against the government and in favor of the taxpayer or citizen. Any doubts as
to their meaning are to be resolved against the taxing authority and in favor
of the taxpayer. * * *'
In the 1040 IRS instruction booklet of 1992/1993, page 3, Margaret
Richardson wrote a disclaimer stating income taxes are voluntary. We do not nor
ever have volunteered to give our wealth away.
WHERE IS YOUR MANDATORY FOREIGN AGENTS REGISTRATION ACT OF 1938?
https://www.justice.gov/nsd-fara
“THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA” is a franchise of the foreign corporation
calling its self: “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” both thereby being liable to
the international laws. You are all in violation of the International Covenants
on Civil and Political Rights:
Article 1
1. All peoples have the right of
self-determination, "By virtue of that right they freely determine their
political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural
development.
2. All peoples may, for their own
ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to
any obligations arising out of international economic co-operation, based upon
the principle of mutual benefit, and
international law. In no case may a
people be deprived of its own means of subsistence.
3. The States Parties to the
present Covenant, including those having responsibility for the administration
of Non-Self-Governing and Trust Territories, shall promote the realization of
the right of self-determination, and shall respect that right, in conformity
with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.
Article 2
1. Each State Party to the
present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within
its territory and subject to its Jurisdiction the rights recognized in the
present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex,
language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin,
property, birth or other status.
2. Where not already provided for
by existing legislative or other measures, each State Party to the present
Covenant undertakes to take the necessary steps, in accordance with its
constitutional processes and with the provisions of the present Covenant, to
adopt such legislative or other measures as may be necessary to give effect to
the rights recognized in the present Covenant.
3. Each State Party to the
present Covenant undertakes:
(a) To ensure that any person
whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an
effective remedy, notwithstanding that
the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity;
Article 5
1. Nothing in the present
Covenant may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any
right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of
any of the rights and freedoms recognized herein or at their limitation to a
greater extent than is provided for in the present Covenant.
2. There shall be no restriction
upon or derogation from any of the fundamental human rights recognized or
existing in any State Party to the present Covenant pursuant to law,
conventions, regulations or custom on the pretext that the present Covenant
does not recognize such rights or that it recognizes them to a lesser extent.
Article 7
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his
free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.
Article 8
1. No one shall be held in slavery; slavery and the slave-trade in all
their forms shall be prohibited.
2. No one shall be held in servitude.
3. (a) No one shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labour;
Article 9
1. Everyone has the right to
liberty and security of person. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or
detention. No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and
in accordance with such procedure as are established by law.
Article 17
1. No one shall be subjected to
arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or
correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation.
2. Everyone has the right to the
protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
Proclamation to the people of California. Year: 1849,
We, the people of California,
grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, in order to secure its blessings, do
establish this Constitution.
Article 1,
sec. 1. All men [living souls]
are by nature free and independent, and have certain inalienable rights, among
which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring,
possessing and protection of property: and pursuing and obtaining safety and
happiness.
Sec. 2. All political power is inherent in the people, government is
instituted for the protection, security
and benefit of the people: and they have the right to alter or reform the
same, whenever the public good may require it.
Sec. 9. Every citizen, [living
soul] may freely speak, write and publish his [their] sentiments on all
subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right; and no law shall be
passed to restrain of abridge the liberty of speech or of the press.
Sec. 15. No person shall be
imprisoned for debt, in any civil action on mesne or final process, unless in
cases of fraud: and no person shall
be imprisoned for a militia fine in time of peace.
Sec. 16. No bill of attainder, ex
post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be
passed.
What is a contract?
A contract is an agreement
between two or more persons (e.g., individuals, corporations, partnerships,
limited liability companies or government agencies) to do, or to refrain from
doing, a particular thing in exchange for something of equal value. No enforceable contract would come into existence if
obtained by force, fraud or
deception/non-disclosure. The consent or assent of a party to an agreement
must be genuine, clearly defined and
voluntary. This assent will not be genuine or voluntary in certain cases of
duress, mistake, deception or undue pressure. In these cases, any contract real
or assumed are null and void, i.e. fraud vitiates all.
You must produce the contract that you are
claiming to have made with these living souls, whereby both parties are
mutually benefited. No such contract
exists. Therefore, your Demand for a Tax Return where you claim “We believe you
need to file a 2016 California Income tax return.”, and other statements made
by you on your Notice Number: 01-3146071-083018, and Order Number:
625269059114214533, which are computer-generated pieces of paper sent to a dead
entity without a living soul acknowledging their creation, are irrelevant and
of no effect.
Sec 17. Foreigners who are, or
who may hereafter become bona fide residents of this State, shall enjoy the
same rights in respect to the possession, enjoyment and inheritance of
property, as native-born citizens. [i.e. wages, income and all other forms of property, are the
real, personal and private property of living souls and are not subjected to
your claims of ownership under your criminal frauds against WE THE PEOPLE.
Re-read the two maxims of law]
Sec 18. Neither slavery, nor involuntary servitude, unless for the
punishment of crimes, shall ever be
tolerated in this State.
Sec 19. The right of the people
to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable
seizures and searches, shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue but on
probable cause, supported by oath or
affirmation, particularly describing the place to be searched, and the
persons and things to be seized.
THE BILL OF RIGHTS
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise
thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress
of grievances.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the
United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are
reserved to the States respectively, or
to the people.
These facts remove all
controversy from the matter at hand, thus meaning there is no longer any
recourse to a court of law since this NOTICE CEASE AND DESIST, is a PRIMA FACIE
CASE. This Notice to Cease and Desist addresses the crimes and violation of
OATHS of all subordinate public servants acting under your supervision and
includes specifically, all identified in This Notice to Cease and Desist by
their ignoring their moral and fiduciary duty. The following stare decisis
apply; Hafer v. Melo, 502 US 21 (1991): “US Supreme Court held that state
officials acting by ”color of law” may be held
personally liable for the injuries or torts they cause and that official or
sovereign immunity may not be asserted.”; Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 US 232 (1974),
94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974), “When a state officer acts under a state law in a
manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he comes into conflict with the
superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or
representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of
his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity
from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States.”; Warnock v
Pecos County, Texas, 116 F. 3d 776 – No.96-50869 Summary Calendar. July 3,
1997.
In the Western world and many
Eastern countries, each of us was born into the world with a bounty on our
heads. This is due to the fact that our federal government considers us as
enemies of the state. According to Judge Dale, author of The Great American
Adventure: The Secrets of America, if you live in the United States, the act
that makes you an enemy of the U.S. federal government is “The Trading with the
Enemy Act.” This act was amended by Franklin D. Roosevelt in March 1933.
Even though you are considered an
enemy of the corporate government, it actually has no jurisdiction over you as a living man or woman. However, if you
agree to be a citizen of your corporate government, then it has jurisdiction
over you. For example, to be a United States citizen means that you are an
“employee” of the United States which is a corporation. If you want evidence of
this, look at subsection 14 & 15 in Title 28 U.S. Code § 3002 and you
should see this phrase “”(14) “State”
means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth
of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or
possession of the United States.
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the
United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States””
In regards to the living man or woman
including identities, titles, real, personal and private property, flesh, body,
blood, fluids and dna, cannot be patented transferred or sold nor be collateral
for any sureties. Re-read the two maxims of law.
These criminal corporations are under new management, controlled by the
military and are being completely restructured, removing all the criminals that
have committed extreme atrocities against We The People. There are currently
over 63,000 sealed indictments, some of which have already begun tribunals. Out
of that 63,000 sealed indictments, over 10,000 nearing 11,000, are for
California alone. The second largest being held is in Texas.
51,000 Indictments:
Sealed,Indictments:
http://www.rumormillnews.com/pix9/Sealed_Indictments_August_2018_Update_rev_2.png
Tony Gambino confirms the JFK kill shot and more:
Keys to the Kingdom: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zWWJ1BzKgI
As promised by the current administration, the swamp is being drained
and it is only a short mater of time, all the crimes and evil that has been
done for decades to the people of this country will be exposed and the
criminals brought to true justice.
The Conspiracy Project: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sDSv5WQ1m0&app=desktop
Vaccines are designed to kill us:
Outlaw vaccines: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ir8k18GP_3Y&feature=youtu.be
Num exposes damage by nano tech and
more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boBdrbODm3s
STATE OF CALIFORNIA CAFR ACCOUNT: https://www.sco.ca.gov/Files-ARD/CAFR/cafr17web.pdf
TO RETURN EXPEDIENTLY ALL THAT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND
ITS AGENCIES, THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE AND ITS AGENCIES AND THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA AND ITS AGENCIES, THAT WHICH THEY HAVE EXTORTED FROM OUR WAGES, OUR
LANDS, OUR TITLES, OUR REAL, PRIVATE AND PERSONAL PROPERTIES, INCLUDING THIS
LATEST EXTORTION OF OUR WAGES OF $6,070.66, WHICH IS ALL AN EXCHANGE OF OUR
LABOR, AND IS OVER AND ABOVE THE THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS WHICH ARE EXTORTED FROM
OUR PAY CHECKS EVERY YEAR BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE INTERNAL REVENUE
SERVICE AND STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
TO RESTORE US WHOLE FROM ALL THE FRAUDULENT MORTGAGES AND THE
FRAUDULENT FORECLOSURE OF OUR REAL PROPERTY AT STREET, CALIFORNIA BY GMAC AND
THE BANKS, ON ALL TRUSTS, BONDS AND SO FORTH THAT THESE CORPORATIONS AND THEIR
AGENCIES AND AGENTS HAVE CREATED WITHOUT OUR CONCENT. I.E. BIRTH REGESTRY,
SOCIAL SECURITY, INSURANCE BONDS, LICENSES, TRUSTS, BONDS AND ALL OTHER
CREATIONS USING OUR IDENTITIES AS FICTIOUS NAMES AGAINST OUR WILL AND KNOWLEDGE.
TO CEASE AND DESIST ALL TOXINS AND POISONOUS SUBTENANTS BEING
ADDED TO VACCINES, OUR WATER, AIR, FOOD, ETC.
TO REMOVE ALL BLOCKS WHICH IMPEED OUR LAWFUL RIGHT TO REDEEM AND
EXCHANGE CURRENCY WITH ALL OTHER COUNTRIES, FOR OUR CURRENCY.
ALL OTHER SYMBOLISM, GRAMMER, LANGUAGE, REQUIREMENTS, DEMANDS,
STATUTES, CODES, CLAIMS OF ENFORCEMENTS, ETC., TO DECEIVE, OR FORCE PERFORMANCE
UPON US BY ALL AGENCIES AND AGENTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARE IRRELEVANT TOWARD WE
THE PEOPLE. THERE IS NO JURISDICTION OR AUTHORITY OF THESE CORPORATIONS,
AGENCIES AND AGENTS, TO CREATE OR ENFORCE ANY ACTIONS AGAINST WE THE PEOPLE.
THE POWER AND AUTHORITY IS IN THE POSSESSION OF WE THE PEOPLE. WE ARE LIVING
SOULS, ALIVE ON THE LAND AND SOIL OF AMERICA, NOT VESSELS, NOT DEAD AT SEA.
YOU WILL HONOR THIS NOTICE AND DEMAND, OUR NOTICE OF PARAMOUNT
CLAIM, OUR POA, OUR FEE SCHEDULE, OUR REVOCATIONS OF ELECTION AND OUR MANDATORY
NOTICES. WE ARE OWED THE LAW OF PEACE, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PAMPHLET
27-161-1, FROM ALL TERRITORIAL AND MUNICIPAL OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES WHO OTHER
WISE HAVE NO PERMISSION TO APPROACH OR ADDRESS US.
YOU ARE ALL
PART OF THE SAME WEB OF CORRUPTION, YOUR CONTINUED ACTIONS ESTABLISHES PROOF.
YOU ARE TO DISCONTINUE YOUR DISHONOR WITH UNCLEAN HANDS UPON US.”
Credit where Credit is Due
Let’s give credit where credit is
due. Hundreds of thousands of souls that live only by reality, truth, honor and
integrity, suffering great hardships to the extreme of losing their lives have
gone before us to ensure we have stored in posterity the truth of what has and
continues to occur in our world.
It has become my great honor
through my own great suffering and loss, to pass on a small portion of what
they brought forward for us to find.
It is my hope that all who find
my voice speaking out, will pick up the torch and assist in this fight to save
lives, our world and the next generations to follow our lead.
Facing the truth should not be a
hard thing and yet it is the only thing that stops so many of us from living a
life of honor and integrity. A shallow life lived is an empty life indeed.
May we all wake up and expose the
terrors and corruption that has and continues to destroy the beauty this life
should’ve been, in the hopes we can destroy the evil and bring into reality
that which this planet and all her inhabitants truly have to offer.
It is stipulated that all
exhibits attached are to be understood as being incorporated herein as if
written within this Notice and Demand, verbatim.
So
said, so signed, so it is done and sealed by my living hand this _17th
_ day of ___September_____,
2018:
|
EXHIBITS
http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/03/trump-prepares-to-declare-california-in.htmlhttp://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm
First Middle Last
c/o address
City, State [zip-9999]
date
Dave Horton
Director of
International Operations
1111 Constitution
Avenue NW
International
Division
Washington, DC 20224
1111 Constitution Avenue, Northwest, MS F180
Washington, District of Puerto Rico, DC, 20224
COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
1111 Constitution Avenue, Northwest,
Washington, DC, 20224
COMMISSIONER OF THE IRS TREASURY
1111 Constitution Avenue, Northwest,
Washington, DC, 20224
Subject: Statement of Revocation of Election, Request
for Concurrence, Update To My Taxpayer Status and Estate
Ref: 26 U.S.C.
6013(G)(4)(A)
THE ORIGINAL OF THIS STATEMENT IS
BEING KEPT FOR LITIGATION PURPOSES
Statement of Revocation
of Election
In accordance with the provisions of 26 C.F.R.
1.6013-6(b)(1)(ii), the undersigned, First Middle Last (the
“Undersigned”), Social Security Account Number your number with dashes, hereby submits for filing
this Statement of Revocation of Election in respect of the Undersigned’s
(apparent) 26 U.S.C. 6013(g)(1) general election to be treated as a resident of
the United States – as Congress define the term “United States” in a
geographical sense in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(9) – as authorized by Congress in 26
U.S.C. 6013(g)(4)(A).
"I am a free sovereign and independent people of the
United States" I accept your oath of office for the commonwealth of your state and the united
States of America. I am guaranteed your loyalty, Good Faith, and Service by the
Treaty of Peace, 1783, The Constitution for the united States of America
Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2, the Expatriation Act of 1868, the Lieber Code,
the Geneva Convention Protocols of 1949 - Laws of War Volume II, Article 3, the
United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Universal Right
of Self-Declaration.
I expect a prompt correction of all records related to me and
my estate including the "infant decedent estate" that was improperly
created "in my given name", the return of title to my property owed
to me free and clear, the copyright to my given name, and the unblocking of all
my accounts immediately.
I demand a forensic audit of all the accounts of my estate to
be performed immediately and my estate to be restored whole and returned to my
possession with full disclosure.
I live outside the foreign jurisdiction to which the Internal
Revenue Code (IRC) operates, which are the District of Columbia and federal
territories:
“The United States government is a foreign corporation with
respect to a state.” N.Y. re: Merriam, 36 N.E. 505, 141 N.Y. 479, Affirmed 16
S.Ct. 1973, 41 L.Ed. 287
“In the United States of America, there are two (2) separated
and distinct jurisdictions, such being the jurisdiction of the states within
their own state boundaries, and the other being federal jurisdiction (United
States), which is limited to the District of Columbia, the U.S. Territories,
and federal enclaves within the states, under Article I, Section 8, Clause
17." Bevans v. United States, 16 U.S. 336 (1818).
“A canon of construction which teaches that of Congress,
unless a contrary intent appears is meant to apply only within the territorial
jurisdiction of the United States.” U.S. v. Spelar, 338 U.S. 217 at 222 (1949)
“The term 'United States' may be used in any one of several
senses. It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position
analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations. It may
designate the territory over which the sovereignty of the United States ex-
[324 U.S. 652, 672] tends, or it may be
the collective name of the states which are united by and under the
Constitution.” Hooven & Allison Co.
v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652, 1945.
Foreign government:
“The government of the United States of America, as distinguished from
the government of the several states.” (Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Edition)
Foreign Laws: “The
laws of a foreign country or sister state.” (Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th
Edition)
Foreign States:
“Nations outside of the United States…Term may also refer to another
state; i.e. a sister state. The term
‘foreign nations’, …should be construed to mean all nations and states other
than that in which the action is brought; and hence, one state of the Union is
foreign to another, in that sense.”
(Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition)
“Almost a century ago, Congress declared that "the right
of expatriation [including expatriation from the District of Columbia or “U.S.
Inc”, the corporation] is a natural and inherent right of all people,
indispensable to the enjoyment of the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit
of happiness," and decreed that "any declaration, instruction,
opinion, order, or decision of any officers of this government which denies,
restricts, impairs, or questions the right of expatriation, is hereby declared
inconsistent with the fundamental principles of this government." 15 Stat.
223-224 (1868), R.S. § 1999, 8 U.S.C. § 800 (1940).[1]
Although designed to apply especially to the rights of
immigrants to shed their foreign nationalities, that Act of Congress "is
also broad enough to cover, and does cover, the corresponding natural and
inherent right of American citizens to expatriate themselves." Savorgnan
v. United States, 1950, 338 U.S. 491, 498 note 11, 70 S. Ct. 292, 296, 94 L.
Ed. 287.[2] The Supreme Court has held that the Citizenship Act of 1907 and the
Nationality Act of 1940 "are to be read in the light of the declaration of
policy favoring freedom of expatriation which stands unrepealed." Id., 338
U.S. at pages 498-499, 70 S. Ct. at page 296. That same light, I think,
illuminates 22 U.S.C.A. § 211a and 8 U.S.C.A.§ 1185.” Walter Briehl v. John Foster Dulles, 284 F2d
561, 583 (1957).
Thank you for your prompt and expeditious processing of this Statement
of Revocation of Election, Request for Concurrence, Update To My Taxpayer
Status and Estate. Please forward your
certification and response to my address above.
I respectfully request that you give a detailed explanation and Lawful
justification of any determination or basis you might make regarding the
disposition of this notification. This includes citing any authority you are
exercising and the regulation or statute from which it derives, as well as any
court cites, Treasury Decisions, etc. that may be relevant to the foundation of
your delegated authority for making a determination of disposition. This letter shall serve as formal Lawful
notice that if you DO NOT respond within 45 days, then by your default and
silence, the Statement of Revocation of Election, Request for Concurrence,
Update To My Taxpayer Status and Estate is proven by Law and is granted.
I affirm, under penalty of perjury, under the Common Law of
America, without the "United States", that the foregoing is true and
correct, to the best of my current information, knowledge, and belief, per 28
U.S.C. 1746(1);
I now affix my own non-negotiable signature to all of the
above affirmations WITH EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF ALL MY RIGHTS AND WITHOUT
PREJUDICE UCC 1-207 (UCCA 1207)
Very Respectfully,
By: ______________________________________________________© Seal LS Non-negotiable Signature, All rights
reserved
Your first middle last name
AFFIRMATION OF MAILING
The undersigned, Witness’ name (the
“Undersigned”), is over 18 years of age and not a party to the within action.
The Undersigned’s mailing address is:
Witness’ name
c/oWitness’ address
Witness’ city, state,
[zip-9999]
On this _________ day of ___________________________, the Undersigned mailed one copy of the
following:
• Statement of Revocation of Election,
dated ________________ signed by Your Last, First, Middle one (2) page’s in length,
A total of (2) page’s mailed herewith, (not including this
Affidavit of Mailing) by USPS Certified Mail with Return Receipt Number [7013 1090
0001 6293 5427] in a sealed envelope with postage pre-paid, properly addressed
to:
Director of
International Operations
Internal Revenue
Service
Washington, D.C.
(20225)
INTERNAL REVENUE
SERVICE CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS
1111 Constitution
Avenue, Northwest, MS F180
Washington, District
of Puerto Rico, DC, 20224
COMMISSIONER OF THE
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
1111 Constitution
Avenue, Northwest,
Washington, DC,
20224
COMMISSIONER OF THE
IRS TREASURY
1111 Constitution
Avenue, Northwest,
Washington, DC,
20224
The Undersigned hereby solemnly swears, declares, and states
that the Undersigned executes this Affidavit of Mailing on the Undersigned’s
unlimited liability, that the Undersigned is competent to state the matters set
forth herein, that the facts stated herein are true, correct, and complete in
accordance with the Undersigned’s best firsthand personal knowledge and belief,
and that this Affidavit of Mailing is signed, sworn to, and executed on:
_______________________________________________ in City, county, State.
By: __________________________________________________________________________© Seal
LS
Non-negotiable Autograph, All rights
reserved
Matthew 18:16 ….that at the mouth of two or three witnesses
every word may be established.
Date: ___________ By: ________________________________________________© Seal
LS
Witness, non-negotiable Signature, All rights reserved
Date: ___________ By: ________________________________________________© Seal
LS
Witness, non-negotiable Signature, All rights reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment