n a 6-3 decision issued today in the case of Rodriguez v. United States,
the U.S. Supreme Court held that Nebraska police violated the Fourth
Amendment by extending an otherwise lawful traffic stop in order to let a
drug-sniffing dog investigate the outside of the vehicle.
According to the majority opinion of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, which
was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia,
Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan, “a police stop
exceeding the time needed to handle the matter for which the stop was
made violates the Constitution’s shield against unreasonable seizures.”
While “an officer...may conduct certain unrelated checks during an
otherwise lawful traffic stop,” Ginsburg held, “a dog sniff, unlike the
routine measures just mentioned, is not an ordinary incident of a
traffic stop.”
At issue was a 2012 traffic stop conducted by a Nebraska police officer
who happened to have his K-9 dog in the cruiser with him. When the
stopped driver, Dennys Rodriguez, refused to consent to letting the drug
dog walk around the outside of his vehicle, the Nebraska officer called
for back-up, thereby prolonging the stop by an additional eight
minutes. According to the Court’s ruling today, those extra minutes
violated Rodriguez’s constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment.
During the January 2015 oral argument in the case, Justice Sonia Sotomayor previewed
the Court’s skepticism towards the police officer’s approach. “We can't
keep bending the Fourth Amendment to the resources of law enforcement,”
Sotomayor declared. “Particularly when this stop is not incidental to
the purpose of the stop. It's purely to help the police get more
criminals, yes. But then the Fourth Amendment becomes a useless piece of
paper.”
The Supreme Court’s opinion in Rodriguez v. United States is available here.
http://reason.com/blog/2015/04/21/supreme-court-says-police-violated-4th-a#.drapl9:VCac
Wednesday, April 22, 2015
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Well, these "judges" seem to be coming around. . . I wonder if it is the fact that they have received a copy of the Quo Warranto as was served to them by http://nationallibertyalliance.com. Not too long ago, these same judges would have just sided with the fuzz and had that guy cuffed-n-stuffed. Particularly Sotomayor. That one is a case, now for sure!
Go to that site and scroll down a bit and find the PDF of the Quo Warranto and read it. Kinda puts them in their place.
DS
Post a Comment