OBAMA
ADMINISTRATION AND UNITED NATIONS ANNOUNCE GLOBAL POLICE FORCE TO
FIGHT ‘EXTREMISM’ IN U.S.
Holy
Crap... Now we know why G.I. Joe was turned into a UN PeaceKeeper.. To
get the next Generation used to the Idea of UN Troops on American soil..
Susoni
On Wednesday, Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced at the United Nations that her office would be working in several American cities to form what she called the Strong Cities Network (SCN), a law enforcement initiative that would encompass the globe.
This amounts to nothing less than the overriding
of American laws, up to and including the United States Constitution,
in favor of United Nations laws that would henceforth be implemented in
the United States itself – without any consultation of Congress at all.
The United Nations is a sharia-compliant world
body, and Obama, speaking there just days ago, insisted that “violent
extremism” is not exclusive to Islam (which it is). Obama is redefining
jihad terror to include everyone but the jihadists. So will the UN,
driven largely by the sharia-enforcing Organization of Islamic
Cooperation (OIC) and the pro-Islamic post-American President Obama, use
a “global police force” to crush counter-jihad forces?
So if the local and municipal effort to counter
the euphemistic and disingenuous “violent extremism” is inadequate and
hasn’t developed “systematic efforts are in place to share experiences,
pool resources and build a community of cities to inspire local action
on a global scale,” the feds – and the UN – have to step in. Thus the
groundwork is being laid for federal and international interference down
to the local level. “The Strong Cities Network,” Lynch declared, “will
serve as a vital tool to strengthen capacity-building and improve
collaboration” – i.e., local dependence on federal and international
authorities.
Lynch made the global (that is, United Nations)
involvement clear when she added: “As we continue to counter a range of
domestic and global terror threats, this innovative platform will enable
cities to learn from one another, to develop best practices and to
build social cohesion and community resilience here at home and around
the world.”
This internationalist character was brought to
the fore by the fact that the Strong Cities Network was launched on
September 29 not at the White House or the Department of Homeland
Security, or at the FBI headquarters or anywhere else that might be
fitting for a national project, but at the United Nations.
Even more ominously, the DoJ press release says
that the Strong Cities Network “will strengthen strategic planning and
practices to address violent extremism in all its forms by fostering
collaboration among cities, municipalities and other sub-national
authorities.” Sub-national and international: the press release then
quotes Governing Mayor Stian Berger Røsland of Oslo, Norway, a
participant in the Strong Cities Network, saying: “To counter violent
extremism we need determined action at all levels of governance. To
succeed, we must coordinate our efforts and cooperate across borders.
The Strong Cities Network will enable cities across the globe pool our
resources, knowledge and best practices together and thus leave us
standing stronger in the fight against one of the greatest threats to
modern society.”
But what is that greatest threat, exactly?
Remember, the DoJ presser says that the SCN will “address violent
extremism in all its forms.” It also says that it will aid initiatives
that are working toward “building social cohesion and resilience to
violent extremism.” “Building social cohesion” is a euphemism for
keeping peace between non-Muslim and Muslim communities – mostly by
making sure that non-Muslims don’t complain too loudly about, much less
work against, rapidly expanding Muslim populations and the Islamization
of their communities.
The DoJ presser noted that at the launch of the
Strong Cities Network, “welcoming remarks” would be offered by the
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Prince Zeid Ra’ad Al
Hussein and Mayor Bill de Blasio of New York City. The involvement of
New York City’s Marxist internationalist mayor is yet another warning
sign.
3 comments:
Who's funding it if Congress is not involved?
WHISKEY TANGO FOXTROT?
What say US CONgress? US House of Representatives? US Senate? Governors of ALL 50 States & DC?
Inquiring minds would like to know, por favor!
whiskey... tango... foxtrot... as in W...T...F... see?
Post a Comment