Monday, October 26, 2015

Putin's advice to all Americans


PUTIN'S ADVICE TO ALL AMERICANS
             
            [Vladimir Putin]                            [Putin attending a Russian Orthodox Church]


Vladimir Putin's speech - SHORTEST SPEECH EVER

On August 04, 2015, Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, addressed the Duma (Russian Parliament) and gave a speech about the tensions with minorities in Russia as follows:


"In Russia, live like Russians.  Any minority, from anywhere, if it wants to live in Russia, to work and eat in Russia, it should speak Russian, and should respect the Russian laws.  If they prefer Sharia Law, and live the life of Muslim's then we advise them to go to those places where that's the state law.

"Russia does not need Muslim minorities.  Minorities need Russia and we will not grant them special privileges, or try to change our laws to fit their desires, no matter how loud they yell 'discrimination.'  We will not tolerate disrespect of our Russian culture.  


We better learn from the suicides of America, England, Holland and France, if we are to survive as a nation.  

The Muslims are taking over those countries and they will not take over Russia.  The Russian customs and traditions are not compatible with the lack of culture or the primitive ways of Sharia Law and Muslims. 

"When this honorable legislative body thinks of creating new laws, it should have in mind the Russian national interest first, observing that the Muslims Minorities Are Not Russians."  

The politicians in the Duma gave Putin a five minute standing ovation.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

I have seen this "quote" a couple times before, on this site and others. When you check for it's authenticity you find it to be false:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/putinduma.asp
Nesaranews is an interesting site to visit but keep in mind it simply re-posts articles from elsewhere and it does not vet out any of the information. It is up to the reader to take responsibility for what they read and what they believe. Since much of what this website posts falls under the "don't trust the authorities", I suggest similar attitude should prevail for their material as well. Don't just trust, verify from multiple sources.

Anonymous said...

Well, if you are so interested in this or any other information as to its authenticity, you DO know how to do searches on the net - right? If articles or quotes or 'info' is so important to you, do your own homework. As for this quote, whether it is true or not - it is definitely 'right on' in my opinion. Nuff said. Got other things to do besides 'debate' over trivia.

Anonymous said...

So what exactly are you objecting to?

My comment that "... It is up to the reader to take responsibility for ... what they believe" ?

Are you arguing for the opposite point of view?

Popeye said...

ANYONE THAT USES SNOPES IS A TOTALLY LOST IN SPACE....THESE FOLKS HAVE BEEN ARRESTED FOR BEING GOV. DISINFORMATION AGENTS.. CHECK IT OUT.... http://drrichswier.com/2015/08/06/snopes-com-ceo-arrested-on-charges-of-fraud-and-corruption/

Anonymous said...

ah yes - the diversion of attention technique, I thought the topic here was Putin's speech, whether it was true or just fiction or propaganda. I did do research from multiple sources before making my comments. I didn't report all of the research to keep my comments short, but for the record I checked other sites like truthorfiction.com hoax-slayer.com etc. I disagree this is "trivia". If it's a public speech by a leader of a nuclear nation made in in highest legislative body, then it's a statement of official government policy and very significant. And I reminder the readers the lead line in the article here was "Putin's advice to all Americans". If an official speech it would be published as a transcript by the Russian government here: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts and a search provides no results.The truth here is that the origin of the comments are a variation of statements made by Australian Finance Minister Peter Costello in a speech to the Sydney Institute on February 23, 2006 (many internet sources verify this). My overall point here is that Nesarnews is up front about their focus and how they publish (re-post but do not do investigate and vet the information from other sources, Hence an occasional reminder to the readership about that is appropriate. In an age where we have terrorists, political spin doctors, nuclear weapons, etc. examination and a healthy skepticism of truth, fiction, and propaganda is necessary and healthy. Just because something is published on "theabsolutetruth.com" does not mean we need to believe and walk the line like lemmings. The sad truth is that truther movement also has it's share of people with an agenda. Enough said, thanks for allowing me to express my views.

Olive Oyl said...

Would agree with you on most points; however, don't you think perhaps you are being a bit negative, even biased against Nesara News? There are hundreds if not thousands of alternative news blogs on the web, and it takes time to operate each one. Articles are passed around from one to another - why? Because most of the blogs are 'alternative' news sites, publishing information that is NOT readily available via the CONTROLLED BY THE CABAL media. It is because of these alternative news sites that Americans, patriots, etc receive alerts and actual news they would NEVER receive if depending upon CNN, FOX or MSNBC, etc. If you want your articles researched prior to publication, perhaps you should VOLUNTEER your services to some blog and do the research for them, as most don't charge for their publishing services and most do not have the financial strength to pay staff to do the job for them. If you are so concerned about what you read, do your own research and discard the reports you decide are not worthy to retain. Most readers are fairly savvy and intelligent and make their own decisions as to what they read and/or care to believe or not. It is not your place to continually criticize a blog - this one or any one of them. If you aren't happy with this blog and its publications, you are more than welcome to move on to another blog which perhaps will care to debate you on all the negative issues you want to bring up, but we are not one of those. No one cares about your criticisms, and no one here is going to take the time to work through them with you. Those who work on this blog work long hours and give of their time to great lengths as VOLUNTEERS to provide the information, and they do not deserve your attempts to negate what they do. Our advice to you is to move on, as future such comments will simply be deleted.