arnie
DMV Commits the crime of conversion – Violates the Fith Amendment?
Two Maxims of Law
• A
piratis et latronibus capta dominium non mutant.
Things captured by pirates or robbers do not change their
ownership.
• A
piratis aut latronibus capti liberi permanent.
Those captured by pirates or robbers remain free.
RIGHTS THAT
CANNOT BE TAKEN AWAY.
We are NOT U.S. CITIZENS
STATUTES ARE
NOT LAW – TO BE CONVICTED UNDER A STATUTE YOU MUST HAVE MY CONSENT.
We do NOT GIVE OUR CONSENT EVER. We are NOT U.S. CITIZENS, i.e. We are
living Souls and not a dead entity written in all upper-case letters on a piece
of paper or bond paper being claimed as a vessel owned by another living or
dead entity.
A “STATUTE” is NOT a law! Flournoy v. First National Bank of
Shreveport, 197 LA 1057. 3 So.2d 244, 248.
A “CODE” is NOT a law! In Re Self v. Rhay, Wn 2d 261, in point
of fact in law.
A concurrent or “joint resolution
of legislature is NOT “Law”. Koenig v.
Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N.E. 705, 707;
Ward v. State, 176 OKL. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash. 2d 43, 110, P.2d 162, 165).
STATUTE. Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition. The
written will of the legislature, solemnly expressed according to the forms
prescribed in the constitution; an act of the legislature.
U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION – The
common law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land, the codes, rules,
regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law”. Self v.
Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261.
U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION – ALL codes, rules, and regulations are for
government authorities ONLY, not human/Creators in accordance with God’s Laws.
All codes, rules and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due
process…” Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d, 1344,
1348 (1985).
Supreme Court 1796- This decision has never been overturned:
United States Supreme Court Decision from 1796- [Cruden v. Neale, 2
N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E.] "There, every man is independent of all laws,
except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed
by his fellowman without his consent."
“There are NO Judicial Courts in America and have not been since 1789.
“Judges” do NOT enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce
Statutes and Codes. FRC v. GE, 281 U.S. 464 Keller v. Potomac Elec. Co., 261
U.S. 428 1 Stat. 138-178”
“There have NOT been any “Judges” in America since 1789. There have
only been Administrators. FRC v. GE, 281 U.S. 464 Keller v. Potomac Elec. Co.,
261 U.S. 428 1 Stat. 138-178”
“The Supreme Court has warned, “Because of what appears to be Lawful
commands [Statutory Rules, Regulations and -codes–ordinances- and Restrictions]
on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be
law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance…
[deceptive practices, constructive fraud, barratry, legal plunder, conversion,
and malicious prosecution in inferior administrative State courts].” (United
States v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187, 76 S.Ct. 281, 100 L.Ed. 185 (1956);”
“The Common Law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land. The
codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law.” (Self v.
Rhay, 61 Wn 2d 261), They are the law of government for internal regulation,
not the law of man, in his separate but equal station and natural state, a
sovereign foreign with respect to government generally.
“A concurrent or ‘joint resolution’ of legislature is not “Law,”
(Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N. E. 705, 707; Ward v State, 176 Okl. 368,
56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162,
165).
All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only,
not human/Creators in accord with God’s Laws. “All codes, rules, and
regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process of Law..”(Rodriques v.
Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)); …lacking
due process of law, in that they are ‘void for ambiguity’ in their failure to
specify the statutes’ applicability to ‘natural persons,’ otherwise depriving
the same of fair notice, as their construction by definition of terms aptly
identifies the applicability of such statutes to “artificial or fictional
corporate entities or ‘persons’, creatures of statute, or those by contract
employed as agents or representatives, departmental subdivisions, offices,
officers, and property of the government, but not the ‘Natural Person’ or
American citizen Immune from such jurisdiction of legalism.”
“A “Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport,
197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248),
A “Code’ or Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of
Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248),”
“A
“Code’ is not a Law,” (In Re Self v Rhay Wn 2d 261), in point of fact in Law).”
There is no warrant in law for such a holding. Gould v. Gould, 245 U.S.
151, at p. 153, 38 S.Ct. 53, 62 L.Ed. 211. In 51 American Jurisprudence,
"Taxation", Sec. 316, "Strict or Liberal Construction",
supported by a great wealth of authority, it is said:
'Although it is sometimes broadly stated either that tax laws are to be
strictly construed or, on the other hand, that such enactments are to be
liberally construed, this apparent conflict of opinion can be reconciled if it
is borne in mind that the correct rule appears to be that where the intent of
meaning of tax statutes, or statutes levying taxes, is doubtful, they are,
unless a contrary legislative intention appears, to be construed most strongly
against the government and in favor of the taxpayer or citizen. Any doubts as
to their meaning are to be resolved against the taxing authority and in favor
of the taxpayer. * * *'
WHERE IS YOUR MANDATORY FOREIGN AGENTS REGISTRATION ACT OF 1938?
https://www.justice.gov/nsd-fara
“THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA” is a franchise of the foreign corporation
calling its self: “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” both thereby being liable to
the international laws. You are all in violation of the International Covenants
on Civil and Political Rights:
Article 1
1. All peoples have the right of
self-determination, "By virtue of that right they freely determine their
political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural
development.
2. All peoples may, for their own
ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to
any obligations arising out of international economic co-operation, based upon
the principle of mutual benefit, and
international law. In no case may a
people be deprived of its own means of subsistence.
3. The States Parties to the
present Covenant, including those having responsibility for the administration
of Non-Self-Governing and Trust Territories, shall promote the realization of
the right of self-determination, and shall respect that right, in conformity
with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.
Article 2
1. Each State Party to the
present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within
its territory and subject to its Jurisdiction the rights recognized in the
present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex,
language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin,
property, birth or other status.
2. Where not already provided for
by existing legislative or other measures, each State Party to the present
Covenant undertakes to take the necessary steps, in accordance with its
constitutional processes and with the provisions of the present Covenant, to
adopt such legislative or other measures as may be necessary to give effect to
the rights recognized in the present Covenant.
3. Each State Party to the
present Covenant undertakes:
(a) To ensure that any person
whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an
effective remedy, notwithstanding that
the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity;
Article 5
1. Nothing in the present
Covenant may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any
right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of
any of the rights and freedoms recognized herein or at their limitation to a
greater extent than is provided for in the present Covenant.
2. There shall be no restriction
upon or derogation from any of the fundamental human rights recognized or
existing in any State Party to the present Covenant pursuant to law,
conventions, regulations or custom on the pretext that the present Covenant
does not recognize such rights or that it recognizes them to a lesser extent.
Article 7
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his
free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.
Article 8
1. No one shall be held in slavery; slavery and the slave-trade in all
their forms shall be prohibited.
2. No one shall be held in servitude.
3. (a) No one shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labour;
Article 9
1. Everyone has the right to
liberty and security of person. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or
detention. No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and
in accordance with such procedure as are established by law.
Article 17
1. No one shall be subjected to
arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or
correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation.
2. Everyone has the right to the protection of
the law against such interference or attacks.
THE BILL OF RIGHTS
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise
thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress
of grievances.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the
United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are
reserved to the States respectively, or
to the people.
These facts remove all
controversy from the matter at hand, thus meaning there is no longer any
recourse to a court of law since this NOTICE CEASE AND DESIST, is a PRIMA FACIE
CASE. This Notice to Cease and Desist addresses the crimes and violation of
OATHS of all subordinate public servants acting under your supervision and
includes specifically, all identified in This Notice to Cease and Desist by
their ignoring their moral and fiduciary duty. The following stare decisis
apply; Hafer v. Melo, 502 US 21 (1991): “US Supreme Court held that state
officials acting by ”color of law” may be held
personally liable for the injuries or torts they cause and that official or
sovereign immunity may not be asserted.”; Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 US 232 (1974),
94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974), “When a state officer acts under a state law in a
manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he comes into conflict with the
superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or
representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of
his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity
from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States.”; Warnock v
Pecos County, Texas, 116 F. 3d 776 – No.96-50869 Summary Calendar. July 3,
1997.
In the Western world and many
Eastern countries, each of us was born into the world with a bounty on our
heads. This is due to the fact that our federal government considers us as
enemies of the state. According to Judge Dale, author of The Great American
Adventure: The Secrets of America, if you live in the United States, the act
that makes you an enemy of the U.S. federal government is “The Trading with the
Enemy Act.” This act was amended by Franklin D. Roosevelt in March 1933.
Even though you are considered an
enemy of the corporate government, it actually has no jurisdiction over you as a living man or woman. However, if you
agree to be a citizen of your corporate government, then it has jurisdiction
over you. For example, to be a United States citizen means that you are an
“employee” of the United States which is a corporation. If you want evidence of
this, look at subsection 14 & 15 in Title 28 U.S. Code § 3002 and you
should see this phrase “”(14) “State”
means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth
of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or
possession of the United States.
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the
United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States””
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002
No comments:
Post a Comment