This is a developing story. Check back in for updates.
AUSTIN — Gov. Greg Abbott has signed the state's sanctuary city ban into law, achieving one of his major goals for the legislative session and enacting a bill that is almost certainly headed for legal challenges from opponents.
"Texans expect us to keep them safe, and that is exactly what we are going to do by me signing this law," Abbott said before inking his signature during a Facebook Live video Sunday night - the first time a Texas governor signs a bill through an Internet live stream.
Abbott, who designated the ban as an emergency item in January, signed the bill just four days after both chambers of the Legislature gave it final approval. Its passage is a major victory for Abbott and Republicans who advocate for stricter enforcement of immigration law. The Legislature has tried to pass a ban every session since 2011.
The law will go into effect Sept. 1.
Opponents of the law were quick to condemn the signing. Thomas Saenz, president of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, said that the law was a "colossal blunder" and that the lawmakers who championed it were small-hearted.
"MALDEF will do its level best, in court and out, to restore Texas, the state where MALDEF was founded, to its greater glory, and to help Texas to overcome 'Abbott's Folly,' " he said in a written statement.
Saenz said the law would alienate "nearly half the state population" and make people subject to widespread racial profiling. He said the law undermines voters' rights to choose elected officials who set local policy, makes the job of local law enforcement more difficult by straining relationships with immigrant communities and would cost Texas incalculable losses in trade and tourism as well as in legal challenges.
"This racist and wrongheaded piece of legislation ignores our values, imperils our communities and sullies our reputation as a free and welcoming state," said Terri Burke, executive director of the ACLU of Texas. "Our immigrant communities need to know that we stand with you; we will fight this assault in the courts, at the ballot box, and in the streets if we have to. This is an assault on humanity. It will not stand."
The law will ban cities, counties and universities from prohibiting their local law enforcement officers from asking about immigration status and enforcing immigration law. It will create a criminal charge for police chiefs, county sheriffs and constables who violate the ban and will charge local jurisdictions up to $25,000 for each day they are in violation.
The law will also allow police officers to ask about a person's immigration status during any legal detention, which could include a routine traffic stop. Opponents have likened the law to Arizona's "papers, please" legislation, parts of which were struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court.
It would also allow for the removal from office of elected or appointed officials who violate the ban -- another portion of the law that is likely to face legal challenges.
Abbott addressed possible challenges in his roughly five-minute Facebook Live signing, saying the key provisions in the bill have been tested at the U.S. Supreme Court and approved.
"It simply makes sense," he said. "Citizens expect law enforcement officers to enforce the law, and citizens deserve lawbreakers to face legal consequences."
Proponents of the ban say it is necessary to keep criminal immigrants off Texas streets. If local law enforcement officials don't turn over unauthorized immigrants to federal authorities, they argue, those people could go on to commit more serious crimes.
During the signing, Abbott criticized the policies of Travis County Sheriff Sally Hernandez, who earlier this year changed policies to limit the unauthorized immigrants her office would turn over to federal immigration authorities under requests called "detainers."
"Those policies are sanctuary city policies and won't be tolerated in Texas," Abbott said."Elected officials and law enforcement agencies, they don't get to pick and choose which laws they will obey."
Abbott said ignoring requests for cooperation from federal immigration authorities had "deadly consequences" and pointed to the death of Katie Steinle in San Francisco as an example. Steinle was killed in 2015 by an unauthorized immigrant who had a criminal record.
After signing the bill, Abbott proclaimed: "Texas has now banned sanctuary cities in the Lone Star State. ... The reason why so many people come to America is because we are a nation of laws, and Texas is doing its part to keep it that way."
By 7 p.m., protesters had started gathering at the Governor's Mansion to object to Abbott signing the bill.
"With SB 4, Texas Republicans have cemented their reputation among generations of young Latinos and people of color to come," Sheridan Aguirre, a member of the immigrant youth network United We Dream said in a written statement. "We've made up our minds -- we will not be silenced and we will remember who terrorized our families."
Opponents of the law took Abbott to task for signing the bill on a Sunday and away from press scrutiny.
"It seems fitting that Greg Abbott would sign this disgraceful bill on the Internet on a Sunday night, far from the press and the public," Bob Libal, executive director of Grassroots Leadership, said in a written statement.
Rep. Rafael Anchia, D-Dallas, said in a tweet in Spanish that Abbott had "no shame" signing the bill on a Sunday, the day of worship for a majority of Latinos who are Christian.
"He's Catholic but after mass he signed an anti-immigrant law, SB 4, which has been criticized by the Texas Conference of Catholic Bishops" he said in his tweet.
AUSTIN — Gov. Greg Abbott has signed the state's sanctuary city ban into law, achieving one of his major goals for the legislative session and enacting a bill that is almost certainly headed for legal challenges from opponents.
"Texans expect us to keep them safe, and that is exactly what we are going to do by me signing this law," Abbott said before inking his signature during a Facebook Live video Sunday night - the first time a Texas governor signs a bill through an Internet live stream.
Abbott, who designated the ban as an emergency item in January, signed the bill just four days after both chambers of the Legislature gave it final approval. Its passage is a major victory for Abbott and Republicans who advocate for stricter enforcement of immigration law. The Legislature has tried to pass a ban every session since 2011.
The law will go into effect Sept. 1.
Opponents of the law were quick to condemn the signing. Thomas Saenz, president of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, said that the law was a "colossal blunder" and that the lawmakers who championed it were small-hearted.
"MALDEF will do its level best, in court and out, to restore Texas, the state where MALDEF was founded, to its greater glory, and to help Texas to overcome 'Abbott's Folly,' " he said in a written statement.
Saenz said the law would alienate "nearly half the state population" and make people subject to widespread racial profiling. He said the law undermines voters' rights to choose elected officials who set local policy, makes the job of local law enforcement more difficult by straining relationships with immigrant communities and would cost Texas incalculable losses in trade and tourism as well as in legal challenges.
"This racist and wrongheaded piece of legislation ignores our values, imperils our communities and sullies our reputation as a free and welcoming state," said Terri Burke, executive director of the ACLU of Texas. "Our immigrant communities need to know that we stand with you; we will fight this assault in the courts, at the ballot box, and in the streets if we have to. This is an assault on humanity. It will not stand."
The law will ban cities, counties and universities from prohibiting their local law enforcement officers from asking about immigration status and enforcing immigration law. It will create a criminal charge for police chiefs, county sheriffs and constables who violate the ban and will charge local jurisdictions up to $25,000 for each day they are in violation.
The law will also allow police officers to ask about a person's immigration status during any legal detention, which could include a routine traffic stop. Opponents have likened the law to Arizona's "papers, please" legislation, parts of which were struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court.
It would also allow for the removal from office of elected or appointed officials who violate the ban -- another portion of the law that is likely to face legal challenges.
Abbott addressed possible challenges in his roughly five-minute Facebook Live signing, saying the key provisions in the bill have been tested at the U.S. Supreme Court and approved.
"It simply makes sense," he said. "Citizens expect law enforcement officers to enforce the law, and citizens deserve lawbreakers to face legal consequences."
Proponents of the ban say it is necessary to keep criminal immigrants off Texas streets. If local law enforcement officials don't turn over unauthorized immigrants to federal authorities, they argue, those people could go on to commit more serious crimes.
During the signing, Abbott criticized the policies of Travis County Sheriff Sally Hernandez, who earlier this year changed policies to limit the unauthorized immigrants her office would turn over to federal immigration authorities under requests called "detainers."
"Those policies are sanctuary city policies and won't be tolerated in Texas," Abbott said."Elected officials and law enforcement agencies, they don't get to pick and choose which laws they will obey."
Abbott said ignoring requests for cooperation from federal immigration authorities had "deadly consequences" and pointed to the death of Katie Steinle in San Francisco as an example. Steinle was killed in 2015 by an unauthorized immigrant who had a criminal record.
After signing the bill, Abbott proclaimed: "Texas has now banned sanctuary cities in the Lone Star State. ... The reason why so many people come to America is because we are a nation of laws, and Texas is doing its part to keep it that way."
By 7 p.m., protesters had started gathering at the Governor's Mansion to object to Abbott signing the bill.
"With SB 4, Texas Republicans have cemented their reputation among generations of young Latinos and people of color to come," Sheridan Aguirre, a member of the immigrant youth network United We Dream said in a written statement. "We've made up our minds -- we will not be silenced and we will remember who terrorized our families."
Opponents of the law took Abbott to task for signing the bill on a Sunday and away from press scrutiny.
"It seems fitting that Greg Abbott would sign this disgraceful bill on the Internet on a Sunday night, far from the press and the public," Bob Libal, executive director of Grassroots Leadership, said in a written statement.
Rep. Rafael Anchia, D-Dallas, said in a tweet in Spanish that Abbott had "no shame" signing the bill on a Sunday, the day of worship for a majority of Latinos who are Christian.
"He's Catholic but after mass he signed an anti-immigrant law, SB 4, which has been criticized by the Texas Conference of Catholic Bishops" he said in his tweet.
The Texas Conference of Catholic Bishops, whose support
Abbott often cites on issues like abortion, had strongly opposed the
law. On Friday, the bishops had called on Abbott to veto the bill.
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/texas-politics/2017/05/07/abbott-signs-sanctuary-cities-ban-law
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/texas-politics/2017/05/07/abbott-signs-sanctuary-cities-ban-law
1 comment:
Each one who immigrates here AND gets a social security number, add to the national debt.
Each baby born of one who immigrates is automatically issued a social security number and add to the national debt. The courts get the social security number and bill the government for the debt created from victimless crimes, the hospitals bill the government for the birth and care of those they allow in, including those they allow in who are already ill and need medical treatement.
I have nothing against immigrants.
It's the financial system and how it can access the credit of the people that encourages people to come here, bus here, train here, smuggle here, traffic here, to give them the social security number and to bill the rest of us for the services, bondage, imprisonment, etc of these people.
There is no sanctuary, if they are not counted among the rest of us who are held captive in prisons and the social security numbers used to complete exhaustion of the accounts.
l c
Homeless people, they have already taken every dime out of their accounts. Veterans, they have cleaned out their accounts, and the emptier the account is, the less medical care they receive. Petty criminals, when the account is empty, they won't even pick them up and jail them any more.
I have nothing against immigrants.
People must see beyond what they are being shown, and maybe the non narcissists can at least learn something and stop being co-dependents needing the rest of us to carry their wisdom and tell them what to see in their world.
I'm asking too much, because people want to feel safe, and want someone to give them that feeling. Co-dependency is greatest among those who like their comfort at any cost.
I'll help the energy vampire.
I am an idiot. I will not engage with you. You do not get my energy.
Post a Comment