By Anna Von Reitz
Re-flagging Your "Vessels"
The
way that the vermin in DC have established control over you and your
assets is via the presumption that you are "voluntarily" operating as a
franchisee of their corporation----and therefore, are operating in
"international commerce" as opposed to operating in "international
trade".
As
you know, if you have been following along, the Founding Fathers split
the international jurisdiction owed to the sovereign states into
"delegated" and "un-delegated" functions.
The
delegated functions they granted to the federal government are all in
the international jurisdiction, and all but one, the so-called
"International commerce clause" are absolutely restricted to the actual
domain of the "High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways".
Please
note the word "commerce". Commerce is business conducted between
corporations. If you are not a corporation and not voluntarily
functioning as a franchisee of any corporation, you are instead involved
in private international trade----which is not among the delegated
"powers" of the federal government to regulate.
If
you are functioning as an independent American state trading vessel on
the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways, you are owed the absolute
protection of the Roman Pontiff, British Government and the British
Crown.
If
you are functioning as a Territorial or Municipal Government franchisee
of the United States, you are either (1) an employee obligated to obey
their every whim, or (2) chattel property backing their debts ---- and
you are owed no protection under the actual Constitution at all.
As
you can see, the distinction of whether you are operating as an
American conducting international trade, or as a United States citizen
involved in international commerce, is of vital importance to you in the
conduct of your business affairs and also of vital importance to your
safety, your tax status, and everything else.
With
that as background information, you are now prepared to absorb the
actual subject matter of this post---- the flag you are flying.
The
Stars and Stripes, aka, "Star-Spangled Banner", is the war flag of the
United States. They have been flying it continually since 1860.
The
rats have been involved in commercial "war" for 150 years --- and they
have made war upon us along with everyone else and have abused their
delegated authorities to do so.
Thus,
they have promoted a constant ongoing conflict in the jurisdiction of
international commerce--- a jurisdiction where you and your "vessels"---
that is, your names/NAMES, don't naturally belong.
They've
colluded to create this deliberate mis-identification to expedite
pillaging your estate and gain control over you and your assets. They
have also done it in order to avoid their obligations to you under the
actual Constitution.
To
make it all easier and more convenient for them to act as predators
against their actual employers, they have created the "legal
presumption" that you are all "citizens" obligated to serve their
governmental services corporations---- and that you are all franchisees
of theirs operating in international commerce.
A
few days ago, I issued the "Final Deed of Re-Conveyance and Re - Venue"
which up-ends those presumptions and re-flags your "vessels" --- that
is, your Names/NAMES--- as "vessels in trade".
I
quote in part, "We hereby accept and acknowledge the re-conveyance of
these property assets and material interests to the land jurisdiction of
each one of the actual states now doing business as the Alaska State,
Tennessee State, Virginia Commonwealth, Florida State, et alia, and
confirm to each organic state and to each living property holder their
public and private property, respectively, to be held and enjoyed as
free holds in fee simple upon the land jurisdiction of each state
forever and never again to be mis-characterized as property belonging to
nor standing as surety for the debts of any government services
corporation."
Basically,
this gives Notice to the world that anyone operating under the
Peacetime flag of the United States is engaged in international trade,
not commerce, and is a vessel functioning under the un-delegated powers
retained by the states and people in international jurisdiction.
If
the "Stars and Stripes" is the war flag of the United States (delegated
powers) ---what is the peacetime flag of the actual United States
(undelegated powers)?
It
is known as the "Civil Flag". It has vertical red and white stripes and
blue stars on a white background. This is your peacetime flag in
international jurisdiction.
As
you return to the "land of your birth" and correct your political
status, you need to re-flag your trading vessels---that is, your
Names/NAMES--- as unincorporated entities engaged in peaceful
international trade, not corporate franchisees engaged in international
commerce.
To obtain and start flying your correct flag go to: USCivilflags.org and send your inquiries to USCivilflags@gmail.com or call 307-200-4503 or write to: U.S. Civil Flags, in care of: 441 East 20th Street, Apartment 2A, New York, New York 10010.
A
large variety of flags and flag-related products are available--- lapel
pins, embroidered patches, etc. which enable you to silently give
notice of your political status in an unequivocal and positive way.
Be
sure to take the steps necessary to actually change your own political
status as described In "How to Change Your Political Status and Why"
before you begin flying the civil flag.
Remember that the actual states and people are at peace and engaged in international trade.
Until
the citizenry of the Territorial United States and the Municipal United
States likewise "return home" and embrace peace, they will continue to
fly the war flag and be engaged in international commerce.
8 comments:
Nut job here with the regular post of nonsense and idiocy.
See how much I care what people say, when I know they don't know?
To reveal me, leaves me open to the things that people who do not know, do to the people who do know.
So, nut job here, coming to you directly from the basement (if I can find one)
Anna, why don't you disclose the meaning of a vessel that you took it upon yourself to claim for us. Hmm?
It's because people should be able to look up words in this time of information and disclosure, but nope...they'd just soon as call someone stupid than to gain a bit of wisdom from stupidness.
You can learn from an infant if you paid attention enough. Now that's unconditional love, until they are trained by the masses to do otherwise.
Anna I looked up vessel.
Around 2009 or 2010 and insider of the illuminated posted on a site.
They do that every now and again, and half the people discount them as nut jobs, and the other half humor them to see where they are coming from.
This illuminated one said, to take anything and compare it to you.
I am like a tree because I have limbs and a tree has limbs. I am connected to the ground and a tree is connected to the ground. I need sunlight, I consume water, I need oxygen and a tree produces oxygen, I produce carbon dioxide and a tree needs carbon dioxide, so on and so forth.
So how am I like a vessel. Let's look at the definition shall we?
------------- Definition of vessel ---------------------
1
a : a container (such as a cask, bottle, kettle, cup, or bowl) for holding something
b : a person into whom some quality (such as grace) is infused
a child of light, a true vessel of the Lord — H. J. Laski
2
: a watercraft bigger than a rowboat; especially : ship 1
3
a : a tube or canal (such as an artery) in which a body fluid is contained and conveyed or circulated
b : a conducting tube in the xylem of a vascular plant formed by the fusion and loss of end walls of a series of cells
----------- I am like a vessel because ---------------
My body is a container for holding something, holds my soul and conscience
I'm not a person (not statutory), but I have infused quality of tolerance, patience, empathy
My body is like a watercraft, it can float on water, it can take on water, it uses water for movement (internally, the water has many uses for our organs that are fluid and move and twist and turn and jiggle and shift)
my blood vessels are like a tube or canal for which bodily fluid is contained or conveyed
A conducting tube, for which my heart pumps fluid to the series of cells.
You'll awake to a whole lot of things if you knew what they knew, but only nut jobs share just a little so we can be demeaned and criticized.
Anna said:
I issued the "Final Deed of Re-Conveyance and Re - Venue" which up-ends those presumptions and re-flags your "vessels" --- that is, your Names/NAMES--- as "vessels in trade".
Now the exercise I did above with the real meaning of vessel, does it really mean your Names/NAMES and is a NAME (you can look it up like the adults you are) is a NAME a "vessel in trade" or will it have to be attached to a "container"?
Ever hear of word crafting? Legalease v. English?
In shipping language, the chartered vessel (United States) took on cargo (the people), mortgaged that cargo to the hilt to pay for the voyage (used the credit of the people), then dumped that cargo (the people) over the railing and into the seas (commerce) to collect on the insurance (social security). Then, came back to the point of dumping for a salvage operation….(admiralty / maritime lien)
First, one is “welcomed” into a foreign jurisdiction by the "host nation" of whom, though its "occupying army", extended its hospitality to a foreigner upon registration of the birth event and, per the custom of the host nation, provided a vessel (NAME) whose cargo is destined for the Treasury and an indemnity receipt guaranteeing care and maintenance of the vessel by the host nation in order “his burden be light”. (Read Law of Nations Book II Section 99 and on for the ramifications of this action)
Until, that is, the host nation decided to grant an entrance and extend hospitality for the purpose of drawing foreigners into a snare. For once the snare was engaged, one’s duty as a foreigner is now towards defense of the host nation against pirates or robbers, against the ravages of an inundation, or the devastations of fire, for how can one pretend to live under the protection of a state, to participate in a variety of advantages that it affords, and yet make no exertion for its defense, but remain an unconcerned spectator of the dangers to which the citizens are exposed?
Now, the same foreigner is shanghaied at birth into that foreign jurisdiction (origination to image-nation), conscripted into citizenship (United States or whatever “nation”) as one can only become a Citizen “and not otherwise” via 2 Stat 153, given a “christened vessel” (NAME), then sent to battle across the seas (capitalism: war-shipper of a re-legion), and left for dead (collateral damage and casualty of war). (See Law of Nations Book III Section 15 for the ramifications of this action)
Then a “presumption of death” exists because the “infant” (foreigner) is “missing from beyond the seas” under International Maritime Law via Cestui Que Vie Acts 1540, 1666, and 1707. Now comes the “enforcement of a maritime lien” under “Admiralty Law” ... the IRS or any maritime lien is ONLY VAILD if one is “dead” (dead have no power over the living)
26 USC 6903
“(a) Rights and obligations of fiduciary
Upon notice to the Secretary that any person is acting for another person in a fiduciary capacity, such fiduciary shall assume the powers, rights, duties, and privileges of such other person in respect of a tax imposed by this title…” (Form 56)
(d) Definition of fiduciary. The term “fiduciary” is defined in section 7701(a)(6) to mean a guardian, trustee, executor, administrator, receiver, conservator, or any person acting in any fiduciary capacity for any person.
26 USC 1040 – Transfers of “real property” (issuance of securities under UCC 8-308 as the “appropriate person” is the “accommodation party”)
(a) executor of estate (Name) (resident) you are master of “your” dominion, correct?
(b) trustee of a trust (any portion of which is included in the gross estate of the decedent) (NAME) (14th Amendment Citizen) you are here to fulfill divine providence and self-determination (God’s will) for the benefit of all, thus are trustee.
IRS manual 21.7.13.3.2.2 - An infant is the decedent of an estate or grantor, owner or trustor of a trust, guardianship, receivership or custodianship that has yet to receive an SSN.
How can one be an executor of an estate of a decedent when the SSN has been issued?
Exactly what estate of what decedent is one “administrating”?
26 USC 2032A
(a) (1)(A) decedent was a citizen/resident of the United States to time of death
(a)(1)(B) an “election” made on behalf of the executor
(d) election : agreement (remember “accommodation party”….this is where you come in)
(2) The agreement referred to in this paragraph is a written agreement signed by each person in being who has an interest. (could be anything from a court case to a utility bill)
Now check out 26 USC 674 and Treas. Reg. § 1.674(b)... “the back door”
26 USC 2001
(a) imposes tax on the decedents estate for the transfer
26 USC 2002
executor of estate liable for the tax
So there is a claim in a nutshell. If one does not provide “proof of life” (infant still using the estate and trust) then the one before the court/corporation is presumed to be an “executor” of a decedent’s estate and trustee of the “citizen trust”. The “claim” is nothing more than a ruse to get one to be an accommodating party via UCC 3-419 for the agreement under 2032A(d)(2) for one is presumed to be an executor of a decedent’s estate and the 14th amendment citizen. NAME, is just a trust ANYONE can operate under 26 USC 674 and Treas. Reg. § 1.674(b), but you are trustee as the “presumed citizen” and thus liable under 26 USC 1040(b) for the tax imposed under 26 USC 2001(a) via 26 USC 2002 as if one were executor.
Now this is also the basis for the operation of the “exemption”, so do not go out and try to destroy this, you will not succeed, “they” will not allow it …. Once “proof of life” has been established, NAME now is the “security entitlement holder” and NAME now has whatever credit it needs as the IRS and all these other corporations are now bound to service the securities account (SS#) under UCC 8 as “securities intermediary” and usufructuary.
So, in reality "they" are actively engaged in infanticide and genocide in violation of international law and agreements under the Law of Nations and Lieber Code (Presidential Admiralty Law) for the purposes of accessing the estates of presumed decedents and while these apparent acts of genocide and infanticide may only be on paper, the results of these shenanigans crosses and carries over into the real world and real people suffer because of it each and every time one of their agents come to the door and identifies one through both name and number because one is the infant, now age of majority.
...committing all the oldest sins in all the newest ways
Now ask one of these guys something like:
Do I have a name? Do I have a SS number? Are you aware of IRS manual 21.7.13.3.2.2? Then why am I being held liable as the executor of a decedent’s estate and as trustee of the resulting trust when it appears the infant has a SS number? Would you like production of the footprints of the infant to verify and validate this interest?
The insanity has to stop.
Now, before you guys got out and start running these guys down in the streets, one must also remember, this is also the operation of a peace treaty under Article 2 of the Lieber Code thru Article 43 of the Hague (restoration of public order and safety) of which the 1st essential task is to ensure the inhabitants can live their day to day lives, 2nd essential task is to establish an agreement which maximizes the benefits of both inhabitants and occupying army, and, in keeping with the provision of Article 2 of the Lieber Code that the occupying army remain as a condition of the peace, the 3rd essential task is that government administrates the agreement of which is laid out in Article 31 and 38 of the Lieber Code and Article 55 of the Hague, of which the occupying army is administrator and usufructuary of all public buildings, real estate, agricultural estates, etc… and must administrate them in accordance with the rules of usufruct. The “live birth certificate” is an “indemnity receipt” issued to the “spoliated owner”.
So, when these guys approach you and identify you by both name and number, whatever “lien right” they think they have has just been invalidated by the very fact the name and number was used to identify you. The infant now has a SS number and is no longer a decedent, thus no lien, trusteeship, or executorship to enforce and it is actually a breach of the International Peace Agreement between the “living” and the “dead”.
So, there you have it … the presumption of death is the only thing wrong with “the system” but since it all operates on paper and translates into the real world with real ramifications, then that is a big problem. But a problem we can fix literally overnight.
Just have to accept one has a “NAME” and one has a “NUMBER” but owns neither, then since both NAME and NUMBER have vested within the one, the estate also re-vests within the one as the infant is no longer dead or “missing from beyond the seas”, which automatically “invalidates all maritime liens” as those are just “salvage rights”, and is “of age of majority” and now you operate in pure equity and they are now the usufruct and you are the “naked owner” with disposal rights over all of the estate of the Earth, just like the peace treaty demands.
Just be a good steward.
Thank you. I am the Anonymous May 3, 2017 at 12:41 AM.
I appreciate the time you took to add to the discussion and provide your wisdom and insight.
maybe the infant has never truly "received" the SS#.
maybe the Trust/Estate may be recognized as abandoned, the Grantor has not yet finished the acceptance of delivery of the original Estate as Grantee, and as a result of that mistake in addition to the mistake of failure to express a Will for the PERSONA in the public, it is correctly deemed that the Estate and the SSN shall still be, “…held in abeyance,” by the giving of information of an informant upon an SS-5 Form(ing) an implied trust without an Expressed Will and Intent of the Grantor, which would remain in effect until these things are finished and the Grantee appear to accept the Original Deed of the Estate; The Grantee, having now appeared, returned to competency, reached the age of majority, has accepted the duties, responsibilities, obligations as the joint Heir(s) and Beneficiary(s), with God as my witness, as Grantee, Surety, Peacemaker for the Estate, I put full Faith and Trust in God, Thy will be done
I am the Anonymous May 3, 2017 at 12:41 AM. And the estate exists.
When we look for a needle in a haystack, we have to start with knowing what a haystack looks like. Sometimes we are looking at a needlestack and trying to find something different - the needle. If you knew you were looking at a needlestack, then you'd start working with what you see and not trying to find something different in it.
Freewill is on to it -
So, there you have it … the presumption of death is the only thing wrong with “the system” but since it all operates on paper and translates into the real world with real ramifications, then that is a big problem.
Because they act like the estate is abandoned, they act like they have to control the accounting for it, as there is no claimant, they made sure of that, by assigning it at birth.
Patrick Devine realized the birth certificate was not signed until the infant was viable/alive for three days. He noticed it was signed by an office that is in the probate courts.
I looked into probate to find out what he was chasing down, and what he was looking for makes sense. In some of the probate things I saw, the estate can be claimed by the beneficiary on the death of the decedent. But you have to ask yourself, if the estate is for you as beneficiary, why can't you use it? Why does someone who follows you have to claim your estate in probate? Why would they set it up that beneficiaries have to claim the estate of the dead parent or sibling to have access to an estate, and not claim their own when they are age of majority?
The legislature wrote the statute clear for when the estate is for a decedent, but not for when the estate is for the living. It's as if they know they can't control the estate of the living, or they can't tell the living what to do with their estate.
I read a long time ago in a blog, where someone said they met an elite beneficiary, like a young rockerfeller (yeah I spelled it like that), and they asked them if they were rich and how do they do it, (or something like that) and the young rocker told them, when they are 25 years of age they are given access to their estate and they use the money to make more money. This rocker used his money to purchase movie theaters to fund his estate and support his lifestyle.
So it's accessible to those that know how to get to it, into it.
Patrick Devine was on to something. I read in the probate code that someone had to be 25 years old to take over the estate of a decedent, and that triggered the hearsay of the rockerfeller saying he had to wait until 25 years age to get access.
There's a lot we aren't told, of course, and trying to find things when we don't know what it looks like, makes the discovery even harder.
Thanks again for the dialogue Freewill - you touched on it when you wrote:
" So, there you have it … the presumption of death is the only thing wrong with “the system” but since it all operates on paper and translates into the real world with real ramifications, then that is a big problem. "
Death and paper is in probate - we don't know a needlestack when we see one, is my guess.
If they can take the living property and move it into the dead (probate), then the living should be able to go into the dead (probate) and pull it back out. That's my nut job opinion.
Post a Comment