Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Mountain Man Arrested In Courtroom, Gets the Last Word Again

Mountain Man Arrested In Courtroom, Gets the Last Word Again

truther November 27, 2013
Heather Callaghan
Mountain natural living man, Ernie Wayne Tertelgte, of Manhattan, Montana made a lasting impression on the Internet with his stalwart defense of sovereignty in an epic courtroom appearance we wrote about here.
In this November 22nd courtroom appearance he’s acting as his own defender again and is back to schooling the room on the Constitution. Please see more below for the background.
              Man Arrested In Courtroom, Gets the Last Word Again
Tertelgte was found guilty by a jury on two charges that stem from fishing without a license; mainly, obstructing a peace officer and resisting arrest. Before a jury was selected, Ernie objects from the beginning when the charges are read and continues until he is removed from the room in handcuffs and made to watch the rest of the hearing in another room, still cuffed.
He again emphasizes that he is the natural living man. Why? The Ernie Wayne Tertelgte referred to in the charges appears in all capital letters, which many researchers suggest, refers to a corporate entity, not the actual person.
He points to the American legal system’s ties to the British Crown when he asks:
Why, please, give me an honorable answer, is a British recognized esquire asking questions in an American courtroom?
Why is title of nobility applied behind this gentleman’s name that is recognized as being banned from our country in the 1789 Constitution? Is nobody going to stand for our Constitution?
When the bailiffs finally come by to handcuff him, they tell him to stand up. He remains seated so as not to give them recognition and forces them to lift him. He continues to school the courtroom until removed.
The modern day court system is so far removed from its original intent that it is unlikely the majority of people in the room that day understood any of his references. But when in doubt and frustration they simply silence, threaten arrest, leave the courtroom, handcuff him or end the session.
KBZK News provided some background about the original event that triggered the continued hearings:
The charges against him stem from an Aug. 31 incident which a state game warden attempted to cite Tertelgte for fishing without a license at the Three Forks Pond, which is a state-managed area.
In court, FWP warden Adam Pankratz said Tertelgte refused to give him his name when approached. He was fishing with his 11-year-old son that day and the warden told the court he and a Three Forks police officer repeatedly tried to stop the situation from escalating, but Tertelgte refused to comply.
If you watch KBZK’s report, you might get the impression they are painting him as the one who unnecessarily escalated the situation – again, over fishing without a license.
Tertelgte, who did not get a chance to cross examine witnesses, was fined $150.
Previous Story:
Heather Callaghan is a natural health blogger and food freedom activist. You can see her work at


Anonymous said...

Allow me to correct some typo errors/
Den of corruption, not court.
Kidnap,not arrest
Panel of brain dead fools, not jury
Rogue corporate criminal nazi, not peace officer
Use force and assault him, not lift him

Validation and proof of Bible prophecy that there would be no real justice in the end of times.

Anonymous said...

That other video link is already broken.
I don't know how long this video will be available.
Truth seeking videos, such as this, have a tendency to keep disappearing.

These kinds of cases really interest me.
Cases in which people operating from a higher jurisdiction, such as Natural Law or a Supreme Law of the land such as a Constitutional Law, end up in a lower jurisdiction court.
These lower courts are simply not prepared to deal with such situations and, in this case, the Judge* actually walked out or, otherwise, ABANDONED her Office!

At which point, in my opinion, the living man, operating from a higher jurisdiction, could have occupied her Office by walking up to the bar, without actually entering her court space, pound his own gavel, or his knuckles on the bar, face the clerk recorder, and declare: For and on the record of THIS court; I occupy the highest Office, and authority, in this room. And as the highest authority in this room, and by THIS Law; this court finds Judgement in favor of the defendant and this case is settled and closed! He could also ask: "Are there any objections or challenges to my authority?" Then, if no objections, leave as he did do after declaring: "This court is adjourned.".

*She, the Judge, cannot acknowledge that the legal persona or PERSON is not a creation of the living man.
To do so would spill the beans and break the entire system and she could be hung for treason.
To ask a judge to acknowledge this is to ask him to violate his legal position of authority over his own subject citizens.
It's simply not going to happen.