Monday, December 31, 2012

Understanding the U.S. Constitution - The Preamble

Understanding the U.S. Constitution - The Preamble
Uploaded on Jun 19, 2010

"We The People" is a Capitonym: A capitonym is a word that changes its meaning (and sometimes pronunciation) when it is capitalized... Definition - Homonyms that have the same spelling, but which have different meanings and, perhaps, different pronunciations when capitalized. [The Online Dictionary of Language Terminology]
Example - (1) The proper noun Polish (as in 'someone from Poland') is pronounced 'poh - lish, whereas (2) the verb polish (as in 'making something shiny') is pronounced 'pah - lish.

"The People" does not include you and me. "The Constitution was ordained and established by the people of the United States for themselves, for their own government, and not for the government of the individual States. Each State established a constitution for itself, and in that constitution provided such limitations and restrictions on the powers of its particular government as its judgment dictated. The people of the United States framed such a government for the United States as they supposed best adapted to their situation and best calculated to promote their interests." [Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore. 32 U.S. 243]

"But indeed, no person has a right to complain, by suit in Court, on the ground of a breech of the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact (contract), but he is not a party to it. The States are a party to it..." (emphasis added). [Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah, 14 Ga. 438 (1854) just do a google search for Padelford Case 1854 on scribed.]

I often wonder whether we do not rest our hopes too much upon constitutions, upon laws and courts. These are false hopes, believe me; these are false hopes. "Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no Constitution, no law, no court can save it." Spirit of Liberty 189 Judge learned Hand.


Anonymous said...

"But indeed, no person has a right to complain, by suit in Court, on the ground of a breech of the Constitution.

Do you know why no person has a right to complain?

A person is not a people.

The truth is there. Always. We see it or we don't.

Apparently the standing of the one in court was as a 'person' and the court did not render justice on that.

Now was that 'person' represented, such that there was a representative for the fiction government and a representative for the One who had the complaint but would not stand on their own and litigate the issue.

See God cannot represent God, so a man with God in him cannot represent the God in another man.

Thus a man can represent a fiction, a person and a court doesn't have to listen to the argument.

We'll really wake up and stop all this sleep walking saying we are awake.

Everything above is opinion. What it's worth to you is based on your own research and discernment.

Love you.

Anonymous said...

Amen to that