By Anna Von Reitz
This from Robert S:
"How
can it be that an unincorporated vessel located in Alaska can use a
rule of the State of Washington for a basis in the name claim?"
It's
actually a Washington State Session Law, not a State of Washington
rule, but the fundamental answer is that there is a difference between
unincorporated, corporate, and incorporated.
Names in the form: John Mark Doe have to function both on the land and at sea.
On
the land they are Trade Names. At sea they are Foreign Situs
Trusts. You can't tell the difference between land jurisdiction Trade
Names and sea jurisdiction Foreign Situs Trusts just by looking at
them. They appear to be identical.
That's why FDR's fraud scheme worked so very well.
So
what the Certificate of Assumed Name does is establish the "permanent
domicile" of the Name on the land and soil of whichever state, and then
goes on to claim the Name in Maritime and Admiralty jurisdictions, too.
In those jurisdictions the Name (Admiralty) and the NAME (Maritime)
represent corporate and incorporated entities, respectively.
On the land the Name is unincorporated, in Admiralty it is corporate, and in Maritime it is incorporated.
This
is the difference between Anna (unincorporated being/ "natural
person"), The Anna Company (private company), and Anna, Inc.
(corporation).
Visually
it looks like this: Anna Maria Riezinger (Trade Name on the land), Anna
Maria Riezinger (Foreign Situs Trust on the High Seas), and ANNA MARIA
RIEZINGER (incorporated Cestui Que Vie Trust in commerce).
So,
getting back to your question how can Washington State Session Law be
used to make a claim related to an unincorporated entity in Alaska?
Because the claim is being made in Admiralty jurisdiction and all
franchise organizations subject to federal territorial law have to be in
compliance and have to respect the "corollary" laws of their sister
States.
This is why Minnesota Rule 222 applies nationwide.
This
is why Regulation Z of the Federal Motor Vehicle Code which provides
for the exemption of private autos and trucks from registration has to
be provided for by all the territorial franchise corporations operated
as "States of States" and you can reference the state laws from any
sister state related to this subject to compel obedience.
This
is the same reason that you can walk into a McDonald's franchise
anywhere on Earth and order a Big Mac. If it applies to one, it applies
to all.
It
will be well-worth your while to study this little discussion and
discern the necessity of figuring out the jurisdiction at any given
time---and clearly stating the jurisdiction. It's easy to tell the
difference between "Anna Maria Riezinger" and "ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER"
---- but you have to define whether that "Anna Maria Riezinger" is
standing on the land or floating on the High Seas, because in that case,
we could be referencing the Trade Name of a living woman standing on
dry land, or we could be referencing a Foreign Situs Trust belonging to a
private company operating on the High Seas.
In
the Certificate of Assumed Name we are specifically and purposefully
addressing the latter case---the Foreign Situs Trust(s) named after the
original land jurisdiction Trade Name, and then we go on to address the
derivative Municipal corporation franchises dba ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER,
ANNA M. RIEZINGER, RIEZINGER, ANNA M. and so on. If you don't put in
your claim for "The Anna Company" version Name and claim the Foreign
Situs Trust on the High Seas, you have no standing in their courts and
they can "administer" your "Foreign Situs Trust" however they please.
Preventing that and retaining control over your name and placing it in
proper ownership and character as belonging to an American civilian is
the whole reason behind the Certificate of Assumed Name.
The
Foreign Situs Trusts operate under federal territorial jurisdiction and
so, fall under federal code and statutes that apply to every
territorial franchise "State"--- with the result that the Alaska and
Washington State Session Laws and resulting Statutes have to be in
compliance with federal territorial law and any one of the resulting
corollary laws can be invoked to provide enforcement in any sister State
within that system.
Read
that--- there SHOULD be a California State Session Law and a State of
California Statute that guarantees your right to claim and issue Common
Law Copyright to your own Given Name for use as an Assumed Name in
Admiralty and MARITIME jurisdictions, but even if there is not such a
law on the books in California, the laws already standing in Alaska and
Washington will suffice. This is the "up" side of having established
"uniform" laws and standards for all the state of state franchises.
----------------------------
See this article and over 800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
No comments:
Post a Comment