Administration
is engaged in a massive cover-up
Benghazi
explained: Interview with an “Intelligence Insider”
“The Obama administration is playing the
role of Saudi Arabia’s private army. If Americans knew this, they would
be outraged… The people behind this are laughing at us.”
 |
-
Doug Hagmann
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
|
This is part one
of a multi-part interview with a government insider intimately familiar with
the events that took place in Benghazi. In this part, he provides important
background, and explains this administration is engaged in a massive cover-up.
DH: It’s been a
while since we’ve discussed Benghazi. What have you heard lately?
II: Before I
answer that, I want to get a few things off my chest. Every politician,
whether it’s a congressman senator, diplomat, or their spokespeople and the
media are lying to the American public every time they call the location of the
attack a consulate. It was not. There was absolutely no diplomatic consulate
in Benghazi. None. Words are important here. They can create a wrong
image, an incorrect picture of what was really going on. The property where our
Ambassador and other Americans were murdered was a rented villa consisting of a
primary residence with a couple of outbuildings behind the actual house. The reason they’re still calling it a consulate is to
subtly divert any questions about our activities there.
DH: Let’s go
over this again; exactly what was taking place at Benghazi?
II: As I said, the
place where the attack happened is one of the largest, one of the most active
CIA operation centers in North Africa, if not in the entire Middle East. It
was not a diplomatic station. It was a planning and operations center, a
logistics hub for weapons and arms being funneled out of Libya. Unlike the
embassy in Tripoli, there was limited security in Benghazi. Why? So the
operation did not draw attention to what was going on there.
DH: So in
reality there were no actual security issues?
II: Oh yes,
there were, in Tripoli. Diplomatic cables show that. But it was for the embassy
in Tripoli, the Ambassador and the diplomatic staff in general, not specifically
for the Benghazi location for two reasons. First, the Benghazi location was a
CIA operation, not a diplomatic one. Visible security at that location would
draw unwanted attention there. They had to blend in. Remember, the villa was
located in a somewhat residential area, sort of like the suburbs. Secondly,
additional manpower was not needed there, at this CIA center, as the operation
was already winding down.
DH: I know
you’ve gone over this before, but let’s get into the specifics of the operation
at Benghazi.
II: Good, I want
to be clear. After Gaddafi was taken out, there was the matter of his weapons
and arms that were hidden all over Libya, including chemical weapons - gas
weapons. According to Obama and Hillary Clinton, we were in Libya to collect
and destroy these weapons to make for a ‘safer’ Libya. That’s what they were
telling the American public. That’s not really what was going on,
though, and it seems like all of the other nations except the average American
knew it. Anyway, you can find pictures and videos of weapons caches being
destroyed, but that is strictly for the public’s consumption.
What was really
happening, before Gaddafi’s body was even cold, is that we had people locating
caches of weapons, separating the working from those that weren’t, and making a
big show of destroying the weapons, but only the weapons that were useless. The
working weapons were being given to Islamic terrorists. They were being
funneled through Libya, crisscrossing Libya on a Muslim Brotherhood managed
strategic supply route. In fact, Michael Reagan called it the modern day
equivalent of the Ho Chi Minh Trail in a recent
article he wrote, and he is correct.
The entire arms
and weapons running operation was headquartered in Benghazi, The weapons
were actually being shipped out of Libya from the port city of Dernah, located
about a hundred miles east of Benghazi. That was the ‘choke point’ of the
weapons being shipped out. Remember the Lusitania? Think in those terms, ships
carrying weapons hid among ‘humanitarian aid.’ By the time of the attacks, an
estimated 30-40 million pounds of arms were already transported out of Libya.
From there, the
weapons were being sent to staging areas in Turkey near the Syrian border, for
use by the Free Syrian Army and other ragtag terrorist groups to fight against
Assad. The objective was and still is to destabilize the Assad government.
Why Syria, why
not Iran?
II: It’s both,
but Syria is the primary target here for this operation. First, look at the
bigger picture, look at the so-called “Arab Spring.” Who benefits and by
default, who doesn’t? Who is the architect for what’s going on throughout the Middle
East and North Africa? Whose agenda is being implemented? To specifically
address Benghazi, though, look at the bigger picture here and what is trying to
be accomplished.
The Obama
administration is playing the role of Saudi Arabia’s private army. I think if
Americans knew this, they would be outraged. Our service men and women are
being sold out as mercenaries for the wants and desires of the Royal family,
for the Saudi’s interests. It’s about religious dominance and oil. Who is
really benefitting from, say, what’s going on in Egypt? Mubarak is out, and
the Muslim Brotherhood is in. Who does that benefit? Saudi Arabia.
Look at what we
see happening in Egypt. Destabilization. Do you think the Russians want that?
Hell no. Syria is Russia’s red line in the sand, as you earlier wrote. If Syria
is lost to the Muslim Brotherhood by the actions of Obama, Hillary Clinton and
others in this administration, what happens? Well, it will have an adverse
impact on Russia from a military standpoint. They will likely lose access to
their Mediterranean deep water port in Syria, which is Tartus.
But think
further - three dimensionally. Russia is still the world’s largest oil
producer, and that’s Russia’s primary source of income. Then there’s Turkey,
adjacent to Syria. A large amount of Russian oil and gas, consumed by the West,
flows through Turkey, which is also a player in this operation.
So, the
destabilization of Syria which is exactly what Obama and Clinton are trying to
do, presents a direct military and economic threat to Russia. Assad at least
has kept things in check in Syria. Can you imagine Assad being replaced by
someone like Morsi? That would strike at the very heart of Russia’s economic
health and military capabilities. Think of what’s at stake here. Do Americans
want a regional war? World War III? Has Obama or Clinton asked the American
people if this is what they want?
Make
no mistake, we are doing the bidding for Saudi Arabia. The U.S., NATO
and other allies are engaged in a proxy war with Iran and Russia.
What about
Assad’s war crimes?
Assad is no
angel, but don’t be fooled by the death toll attributed to him. Now this is
important. Remember the first Gulf War? In the run up to Desert Storm, a young
woman testified before the Human Rights Caucus - she only testified under her
first name, which was Nayirah. Remember that she testified that Iraqi soldiers
were taking infants from incubators in Kuwait, leaving them to die? Her testimony
was supposedly confirmed by Amnesty International. Her testimony went viral,
and every war hawk in the U.S. government cited her testimony, saying we needed
to right the wrongs, the inhumanity. It was all one big lie!
After Desert
Storm, it was revealed that Nayirah’s last name was Al-Sabah, and she was
the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States. Her testimony
was part of a publicity campaign organized by Citizens for a Free Kuwait, which
was run by Hill & Knowlton, a PR firm out of New York. People must learn
the back story.
So we see a body
count attributed to Assad. Who’s doing the killing, Assad’s people? Maybe at
times, but the Free Syrian Army and other groups are doing most of the
slaughter.
It’s one huge
‘false flag’ operation and the media is selling it hard. And Americans are
buying it, just like the testimony of the girl from Kuwait.
It’s
one big lie being told by Obama, Clinton, Rice, and others. Many Americans
are buying the lie, and the media is selling the lie. The people behind this
are laughing at us. Don’t you get it? They’re laughing at us.
And do you want
to know what’s at stake? Four Americans were killed in Benghazi. Forty thousand
have been killed so far in Syria. Tens of thousands of Syrian people have
become refugees. Why? For what? To advance the agenda of Saudi Arabia. For
oil.
You know, the
so-called right wing establishment were all up in arms about Obama’s submissive
bow to the Saudi King. Where are they now? Where’s the outrage that the body
count will be much greater than Forty thousand? It is anticipated that if the
Obama plan succeeds, not only will America be committed to yet another war, but
the body count could be as high as FOUR
MILLION. Christians, among others, will be slaughtered. This could trigger
a third world war, it’s that serious.
What are Russia
and Iran doing? Certainly, they must be fighting back.
Benghazi was a
strike against us, the Obama-Clinton agenda. A visible strike, and I’ll explain
more about this shortly, because there are events I will point out that will
put it all into perspective. But think of it this way. How did we successfully
collapse the Soviet Union? I mean, what was the last straw? We attacked their
currency - the Ruble. They’re still stinging from that, and Putin was in the
KGB at the time. Do you think he forgot about that?
So, how do, or will
Russia and Iran strike back if Obama and Clinton continue this insanity?
Militarily? Possibly in regional conflicts, but to take us out, to stop us,
what is the one area where we are very vulnerable? It’s our economy - our
dollar. What’s our dollar tied to? Not gold or silver anymore, and some say
it’s not tied to anything. Well, that’s not quite correct. It’s tied to OIL.
The free-flow of oil.
Oil transactions
everywhere in the world, including Russia and China, are made with U.S.
dollars. We buy their oil with our dollars, and they return with those same
paper dollars and employ Americans by buying our goods and services. As Michael
Reagan wrote:
“[t]his system is also crucial to the security of our diplomatic and legal
infrastructure, which is ultimately backed by our military. It’s the core of
our foreign policy.” He also wrote that “any attack on the free flow of oil is
an attack on the dollar. Any attack on the dollar is an attack on our
ability to project power and protect Western democracies, economies, and
ideals. God have mercy on us all if that attack is successful!”
Tomorrow Part II
Douglas
Hagmann, founder & director of the Northeast Intelligence Network,
and a multi-state licensed private investigative agency. Doug began using his
investigative skills and training to fight terrorism and increase public
awareness through his website.
Doug
can be reached at: director@homelandsecurityus.com
No comments:
Post a Comment