Saturday, June 25, 2016

Brexit - What does it mean?

Brexit - What does it mean?
Special Report

In December, 2012, the United States National Intelligence Council (NIC) published their latest 5-year report that forecasts long-term implications and is titled Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds:
The purpose of this document, the NIC says, is: “We are at a critical juncture in human history, which could lead to widely contrasting futures.  It is our contention that the future is not set in stone, but is malleable, the result of an interplay among mega trends, game-changers and, above all, human agency. Our effort is to encourage decision makers—whether in government or outside—to think and plan for the long term so that negative futures do not occur and positive ones have a better chance of unfolding.”

In planning for a future the NIC says is “not set in stone” and is “malleable”, they pose the question: “Will the US be able to work with new partners to reinvent the international system?

This question leads one to then ask what kind of future does the NIC envision?  And they answer this question by positing these 4 scenarios:  

- Stalled Engines: In the most plausible worst-case scenario, the risks of interstate conflict increase. The US draws inward and globalization stalls.

- Fusion: In the most plausible best-case outcome, China and the US collaborate on a range of issues, leading to broader global cooperation.

- Gini-Out-of-the-Bottle: Inequalities explode as some countries become big winners and others fail. Inequalities within countries increase social tensions. Without completely disengaging, the US is no longer the “global policeman.”

- Nonstate World: Driven by new technologies, nonstate actors take the lead in confronting global challenges.

By these 4 scenarios posited by the NIC, and as anyone can plainly see, the US in its attempt to “reinvent the international system” clearly prefers the Fusion option where it joins with China to create a bi-polar world where these two powers reign supreme with the rest of the world being divided up into more manageable Nonstate Actors that would pose no threat to either of them.

For anyone to fully understand what the NIC, and hence US global policy, is trying to achieve one must also know who they are against—and in its most simplistic term is called the Nation State.

A state is specifically a political and geopolitical entity, while a nation is a cultural and ethnic one, and we know them today as countries—like the United States, United Kingdom, Japan, Germany, etc., and that have only been in existence since 1648

In the aftermath of the 20th Century “total war” concept that decimated entire empires and nations, and killed hundreds-of-millions of people the world over, and spurred on by instant global communications and fast, cheap travel, the nation state was viewed by the Western ruling 'elites' as a quaint, even dangerous anachronism—and in the late 1990’s two critical and very important international policy papers titled The Demise of the Nation State and The Demise of the Nation-State: Towards a New Theory of the State under International Law began providing the intellectual road map on how to destroy them. 

Only by understanding the hatred the Western 'elites' have against nation states can one then begin to fathom the truest meaning of Brexit where the United Kingdom voted to exit the European Union—and which has very predictably led to Scotland saying they might leave the UK, London might become its own nation, five other nations might leave the EU, and even the State of Texas saying, once again, they might become a separate nation, too.  

From your propaganda Western 'elitist' media, all you’re going to hear about Brexit (and the rise of Donald Trump, too) and its deeper meaning is that it was fueled by a right-wing nationalist movement fueled by anger toward political 'elites' and mistrust of immigration — and primarily backed by white voters — who are gaining more and more momentum in both Europe and the United States. 

Even worse, the propaganda from these 'elites' are also reaching near hysterical levels, too—such as the former US Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan warning yesterday: “This is the worst period, I recall since I've been in public service. There's nothing like it, including the crisis — remember October 19th, 1987, when the Dow went down by a record amount 23 percent? That I thought was the bottom of all potential problems. This has a corrosive effect that will not go away. I'd love to find something positive to say.”

Now with this entire tutorial of sorts being explained to you by me, please allow me to give you an analogy of what is REALLY happening:

Brexit is nothing more than a package that was delivered to our collective door yesterday and still has to be unpacked, the instructions for assembly found, and then once it is put together in its totality can it even begin to be understood. 

From the initial pieces of Brexit we can see, however, is that it is nothing more than a “show” of sorts and is meant as a prelude to the even greater chaos to come—and remember this FACT:Fourth Turnings never peter out. They intensify to a crescendo of turmoil, chaos, violence, war, and bloodshed. This Fourth Turning intensification just got turned up dramatically. It will eventually be turned up to 11.

Also, and please don’t forget this, EVERY SINGLE mainstream news article and poll about Brexit were 100% wrong, just like they are about Donald Trump, and many other issues critical to your knowing, too—after all, and don’t forget this either, these mainstream news sources are nothing more than propaganda designed to tell you how to think and act, so they weren’t actually wrong, they just failed to influence you because you weren’t listening!

And if millions of people the world over are failing to listen to their “media masters”, who then are they listening to?

Well, and you know this already, that’s why you’re reading this!

And just ask yourself:  how important is it to you to ALWAYS the know the truth the 'elites' try to keep hidden from you?


Anonymous said...

And what pray tell is a 'Nation State' you ask?

A nation state is a territory. It is not a collective.

A territory can be a nation unto itself, with proper defense.

Texas is one example: After they beat back the Jade Helms and other similar federal government follies, you really don't think they are planning to secede!??

I would guarantee that some of these nation states such as Texas and even more predictably such as Australia, already have it on their ballots to secede and seek divestiture.

The remaining question is this: Can they do it in such a legal manner that they don't receive blow-back and can they protect their territories, in the case of common defense.

And the answer to those questions is the most important of all. After all, a contested state like Texas or Brazil has a far higher chance of success going independent...then a liberal utopia or NWO bastion like California does.

Although the latter such as CA would inevitably try to secede, it's far more likely they would fail and end up as part of someone else's territory. Whereas a nation like Australia or even the Alamo of TX, would proffer new emboldened meaning to the phrase "don't mess with the south."

Anonymous said...

TEXAS is gonna secede next there can be no doubt about it.
All they're waiting for is their state bank to be ready.
They gonna disavow the failed project and after another war which is more like a skirmish, state of Texas will be out.

It's like my brother always said...
What else are they gonna do, wait 'til technology gets so advanced the texans can never leave...??

Anonymous said...

For many years there has been a group of Texans who have been working to secede from this criminal system. Story is that Sam Houston is one of the ones responsible for dragging the unknowing Texas people into the corporation state system. Also that Texas is involved in a treaty with the corporate system that has to be renewed on a regular basis to keep Texas in the criminal DC system. Most Texans have no clue about what seceding would be all about. There will be the ignorant who will fight against the change. Let them leave - let them cross the northern border - the Red River - and head up in to their new found prisonland. If they are that ignorant, they deserve what is waiting for them north of the border. On the other hand, there is laraza - a bunch of communist mexican crazies who will fight to take Texas back - to what? The frick'n stone age? They can't get their own land of Mexico free to prosper. And now they want to make Texas and its people prisoners of the mexican dictator system, its police and the drug cartels, and remain in absolute poverty, too. Stupid is as stupid does. The mexicans working north of the Rio Grande never had it so good. Here they live in homes and apartments. In Mexico they live in cardboard boxes and shacks, yet they want to destroy the jobs and living conditions that they have acquired with their jobs here in Texas? Stupid is as stupid does. Texas has oil, gas, farmland, grazing land for the cattle, and industry. It has a seaport for trade. Texas has good schools and people who use their brains. Soon we will be free from the tyranny of the criminals in DC. AND WE GOT GUNS AND KNOW HOW TO USE THEM.