CHEMTRAILS......
THE STANDARD GOV COMMIE NAZI RESPONSE ....
'THE CHEMTRAILS ARE THERE TO REFLECT THE SUN' AND
'ALL THE TOXIC INGREDIENTS HAVE
BEEN REMOVED'...... AND
'THERE ARE ONLY GOOD INGREDIENTS
IN THE CHEMTRAILS NOW' .....
'ALL THE TOXIC INGREDIENTS HAVE
BEEN REMOVED'...... AND
'THERE ARE ONLY GOOD INGREDIENTS
IN THE CHEMTRAILS NOW' .....
REALLY?!!
CHEMTRAILS ARE THE CAUSE OF AUTISM...AND MANY OTHER NEURO-(MAN MADE) DISEASES AND DISABILITIES, INCLUDING MORGELLONS ...
THERE ARE CURES FOR AUTISM AND FOR OTHER HEALTH ISSUES...BUT NOT FROM THE FDA, CDC OR
THE AMA
THE AMA
BEFORE YOU LOOK AT THE BELOW INFORMATION .... FIRST WATCH THIS VIDEO.... FROM RUSS TANNER....
CHECK OUT THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE:http://globalskywatch.com/stories/my-chemtrail-story/#.WLnJ-sYiy00
THEN ..... LOOK AT THE VIDEOS BELOW AND QUIZ YOUR 'ADVISORS'... SOMEONE IS CONNING YOU.... GUESS WHAT IS ONE OF THE BIGGEST CAUSES OF AUTISM....(CHEMTRAILS)
2 comments:
we do know and want it to stop. The gov has it where they can do it. Who is going to stop it. California sued and won but it still goes on.
Great piece on Chemtrails! The term we need to focus on is "body of water." The 'air' is a less dense body of water, but is still a body of water. Therefore, the act of unlawful discharge of pollutants, as prohibited by law, is subject to prosecution for damages.
Our 'body' is a more dense body of water, consisting of approximately 80%. Likewise, the act of unlawful discharge of pollutants, as prohibited by law, is subject to prosecution for damages. Discharging poison (vaccines) from a syringe is an unlawful discharge of pollutants into a body of water according to law.
QUESTION???
What is "unlawful,"
CLUE... "except as in compliance with this section and sections
302, 306, 307, 318, 402, and 404 of this Act [Public Law 92-500, Sec. 2.], the discharge of any
pollutant by any person shall be unlawful." [Emphasis added]
ANSWER!!! "discharge of any pollutant by any person"
OK - there may be a couple of terms in the answer that a patriot may not comprehend to the fullest extent necessary to truly benefit from having known the "answer." That education is for another time...or, just download a pdf of the Public Law 92-500 and do your own 'word search'...WHAT!? To lazy to do all that work....! OK, let me point out something that may,...just may motivate you enough to do this research.
To gain knowledge on how to redress your grievances for all these wrongs being talked about all the time...without any answer on HOW TO GAIN REMEDY...more specifically, remedy in the form of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$, is not worth the effort...? Is there REALLY a method to gain remedy and relief....?
There is. We all know we are drinking toxic water at our "taps"...don't we?
(if you don't, you can go to www.ewg.org/tap-water/whatsinyourwater/ you should be able to enter your ZIP CODE to identify the toxic pollutants causing (or will cause) you physical harm.)
Sec. 505. CITIZEN SUITS of the Act provides for citizens to claim monetary damages for "imminent injury" resulting from negligence. (imminent injury means that if you have evidence of ever being exposed to a pollutant, you are entitled to claim damages to the same degree as if you could prove physical harm. The logic is, that you will eventually suffer injury)
The Justifiable Claim is based on "each day of violation" of non-compliance with the international public health and welfare public policy adopted by Congress on October 18th, 1972.
"Person." For the purposes of this subsection, the term 'person' shall
mean, in addition to the definition contained in section 502(5) of this
Act, any responsible corporate officer."
(502(5) "The term'person' means an individual, corporation, partnership, association, State, municipality, commission, or political subdivision of a State, or any interstate body.) See also Sec. 510
"(d) Any person who violates section 301, 302, 306, 307, or 308 of
this Act, or any permit condition or limitation implementing any of
such sections in a permit issued under section 402 of this Act..., shall
be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $60,000 per day of such
violation." [Emphasis added - CPI adjustment from 1972 to 2017)
WOW!!! "$60,000 per day"....and they do it every day of the year...!!!! Who needs a "PROSPERITY PACKAGE"???????
What court is competent to render a judgment in favor of the real party of interest in this matter? Well, you will have to answer that yourself. Clue: Sec. 9. Public Law 92-500.
For more information on Truth and Law regarding discharges of pollution go to www.nsea.us.
Post a Comment