Friday, October 21, 2011

The Truth behind Gaddafi's murder

The Truth behind Gaddafi's murder

You all know better by now than to believe The U.S. News Media, the U.S. State Department, The CIA, The Pentagon, and The President of the U.S.

Libya was not a "dictatorship" in the traditional sense, and Momar Gaddafi was not the evil rogue portrayed by Western propaganda.

If fact, he was a hero. Gaddafi’s Gold Dinar Plan and Libya’s Public Central Bank would have changed the monetary system and freed all of Africa from the Private Central Bank System. Ultimately, it might possibly have freed the NATO host nations from their own parasites – Vampire Private Central Banks.

Gaddafi’s courage and pioneering efforts in trying to restore national sovereignty and making the government responsible to the people instead of to the Global Banking Elites is the reason why he was targeted and killed.

NATO terrorist attacks will not get the Western nations out of debt – only an honest Public Central Bank – like the attempted Bank of Libya – would.

But guess what? With Gaddafi now out-of-the-way, the IMF and The World Bank have moved in to Libya, and have reestablished their control and dominance there. And (black man) Obama was the ringleader in the effort to reassert the impoverishment of Africa.

There will be no independence, and there will be no freedom.

The only way for a Country to be Sovereign is to have sovereign control of its money.

The Bankers (and their corruption) won again!


Anonymous said...

This needs to go viral.

Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

I guess you guys don't watch RT... ***** ... - RT is the first Russian 24/7 English-language news channel .. .... ... ... ...*****
Submitted by Katsuo on Thu, 10/20/2011 - 23:03.
I'm not going to say Gaddafi was a hero or anything, but the Libyan conflict was probably most recent demonstration of NATO war propaganda we've seen.
1. There was no evidence that Gaddafi was killing civilians - the reason why NATO intervened was because there was speculation that there Gaddafi was using planes to airstrike protestors which no evidence was presented. 2. Under UN mandate, NATO was only supposed to maintain air superiority and takeout anti-aircraft emplacement to protect civilians. Instead, they went further than that and actually sought full regime change by secretly arming the rebels, targeting and destroying civilian infrastructure and establishing a central bank and a puppet council of unelected individual who may have ties to Al qaeda. Without NATO paving the way by leveling the country and creating civilians casualties( which they were supposed to protect), the rebels would have never gained ground. 3. Lastly, who really won here? The people of Libya? Will Democracy prevail? Hardly... Though the media painted it as a fight for democracy, what we were really watching was tribal warfare. Libya will never be the same again. Gaddafi may have been a dictator but he kept the 100s of tribes in check. He did have some social programs that benefited the people, but it's not a model for civilized society like ours. Now the NTC may not be able to control the rebel fighters so it might degrade into another Somalia.But the winners here are the oil companies. As soon as NATO got control of the oil fields, a lot of oil deals were made and much of the money frozen that belonged to the Libyan people were handed to the the rebel leadership. What the people of Libya got was no food, no water, lost homes and a lot of dead bodies. So just believe me when I say there is more to this conflict then what they are telling you.
... for more comments: