DISARMED FORCES
U.S. general: Obama paralyzed by fear
Exclusive: Gen. Patrick Brady explains why president abandoned Americans in Benghazi
By Maj. Gen. Patrick Brady, U.S. Army
(ret.)
Now I understand! For years, many veterans and active military
have been alarmed about the idiocy of the changes in battlefield aero-medical
evacuation known as ‘Dust Off’. For reasons having nothing to do with patient
care, ‘Dust Off’ has been removed from the control of the professionals,
the medics, and put under the control of amateurs, aviation staff officers, or
ASOs. This is the first such change since the Civil War.
I
document the unparalleled excellence of ‘Dust Off’, and the effects of
the changes, in my book, “Dead
Men Flying.” Needless to say, it was the most outstanding battlefield
operating system of that war – some one million souls saved and unprecedented
survival rates. No warrior of Vietnam is more revered than the ‘Dust Off’
crews.
In the words of Gen. Creighton Abrams, former U.S. Army chief of
staff and former supreme commander in Vietnam: “A special word about the Dust
Offs … Courage above and beyond the call of duty was sort of routine to them.
It was a daily thing, part of the way they lived. That’s the great part, and it
meant so much to every last man who served there. Whether he ever got hurt or
not, he knew Dust Off was there. It was a great thing for our people.”
Fast forward to current battlefields. We hear horror stories
about patients waiting and dying because Dust Off didn’t launch or came too
late. The launch standard in my unit in Vietnam was two minutes; today it is 15
minutes! Can anyone imagine a fire truck taking 15 minutes to get under way? I
could go on and on, but one has to ask, why? Why the changes to an
excellent, proven system?
The answer is the Obama-Panetta Doctrine. In response to the horrible
abandonment of dying Americans in Benghazi, Defense Secretary Panetta said:
“(The) basic principle is that you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without
knowing what’s going on; without having some real-time information about what’s
taking place.”
On its face, that is a remarkable, indeed incomprehensible,
change from America’s doctrine in past wars. By that standard, there would have
been no Normandy or Inchon. In fact, I can’t think of a war we fought in which
we didn’t go into harm’s way without real-time information or to save lives –
something the president refused to do in Benghazi. Dust Off would never launch
in Vietnam under that doctrine.
To fully understand the doctrinal change, one has to understand
President Obama. He has a dearth of understanding of our military and military
matters. We hear he is uncomfortable in the presence of ranking military and
seldom meets with them. He is not a person who can make decisions, and he takes
an extraordinary amount of time to do so, leading to such unseemly labels for a
commander in chief as “ditherer in chief.”
President Obama may have set records for voting “present” on
important issues. He cowers from crisis decisions. He is a politician
who thinks only in terms of votes and his image. Although I was a psychology
major back in the day (I’d love to hear a professional analyze risk and Obama),
I won’t try to define his insides, but I believe he is risk-averse – fearful of
risk – and that is the basis of the Obama-Panetta doctrine.
This aversion for risk dominates Dust Off rescue operations
where, in addition to an unconscionable reaction time, risk assessment is the
primary consideration for mission launch – not patient care. In two years flying
Dust Off in Vietnam, I never heard that term, nor did any Dust pilot I know.
The ASOs, remote from the battle, have developed time-consuming algorithms to
analyze risk while the patient bleeds, something that’s impossible to do by
anyone other than the pilot and the ground forces at the scene.
And Obama’s terror of risk contributed to the massacre of
Americans by terrorists in Benghazi. We hear that the president did not even
convene the Counterterrorism Security
Group while the Benghazi terrorist massacre was visually and
verbally available in real time. That is like ignoring FEMA during Hurricane
Sandy. But once you bring in a group labeled anti-terrorist, you have to
acknowledge terror exists, something the president is loath to do.
My veteran friends are horrified by the Obama-Panetta doctrine. At
least 359 retired flag officers support Mitt Romney – only five that I know of
support Obama. Some 150 former prisoners of war also support Romney; I know of
none who support Obama.
America needs to listen to these veterans. They
understand leadership. They know how to deal with risk in war. They would
not want this man with them in combat or crisis. They never left a needy
comrade behind. Obama did.
Maj. Gen. Patrick Brady, retired from the U.S. Army, is a
recipient of the United States military’s highest decoration, the Medal of
Honor.
No comments:
Post a Comment