H E A D L I N E S
November 23, 2013
ObamaCare Medical Codes Confirm: Execution by Beheading To Be Implemented in America...
November 23, 2013/ RedFlag
(by Lorri Anderson, FREEDOM OUTPOST) -- A faithful reader sent me a code and asked me to investigate how it ties into the larger scale of things. The specific code sent to me will make any American’s hair stand up on the back of their neck. The code is ICD 9 E 978. After reading this code I decided that it was my duty to investigate further and get to the bottom of why we have a medical code in the United States for “Legal Execution.” Below are my results.
These codes were not created by Obamacare, however Obamacare is trying to implement every American citizen under international codes to link us to the “international” system. These codes were actually created by the WHO (World Health Organization) . The WHO is a specialized agency of the United Nations.
[...]
The questions that need to be asked and answered are:
ICD 9 E 978 "Legal ExecutionAccording to reports, more than 68,105 new medical codes are being added due to the Obamacare monstrosity. Doctors all across the nation have been complaining due to the overwhelming burden it places upon them. Just the time consumption alone, making sure these codes are accurate, will inevitably take time away from the doctor/patient relationship creating a barrier of paperwork while destroying the personal experience with your doctor. While these doctors are correct to state it will be even more of a burden, they are not correct to state this has come out of Obamacare itself. Let me explain.
All executions performed at the behest of the judiciary or ruling authority [whether permanent or temporary] as:
- asphyxiation by gas
- beheading, decapitation (by guillotine)
- capital punishment
- electrocution
- hanging
- poisoning
- shooting
- other specified means
- INJURY UNDETERMINED WHETHER ACCIDENTALLY OR PURPOSELY
- INFLICTED
These codes were not created by Obamacare, however Obamacare is trying to implement every American citizen under international codes to link us to the “international” system. These codes were actually created by the WHO (World Health Organization) . The WHO is a specialized agency of the United Nations.
[...]
The questions that need to be asked and answered are:
- Why has the United States been subjected to “International Medical Coding” without our knowledge?
- Why are we allowing “coding” that goes against our principles and constitution?
- Why do we have a code for "Legal Execution" which is illegal in America? With the exception of those given the death penalty after trial by jury.
- When did the Department of Homeland Security find out about this coding? Why haven’t they addressed this (since they are supposed to protect the people)?
- Why is DHS sending any kind of “Medical Coding” to the states?
- Why haven’t the doctors spoken out to make Americans and Medicare recipients aware that their information has been given to an “International body”?
- Why haven’t they made people aware that the WHO is a specialized agency of the United Nations and directly linked to the “League of Nations under the guise of collecting data?
- Why would we allow forced medical coding through congressional bills to come from an organization that supports UN Agenda 21, Millennium Development Goals, and supports the eradication of “sprawl” (which is average people like you and I)?
- Is law enforcement aware of this specific code? If so why haven’t they brought this to the attention of the American people?
6 comments:
BUT BUT BUT .. haven't you heard .. Obozo is on our side .. he is one of the good guys.
I heard that Obozo took 10 million doctors to Hawaii with him .. all expenses paid .. and told them that he would give them $1,000,000 for each head they FedEx to the White House.
The Morgenthau Plan (AKA The Jewish plan to rid the world of Germans.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buUAJc-6-AI&list=FLX3dqnjFFyuDtrSGjEPDClQ&index=7
OK, folks. Don't panic. I used to work in a medical clinic. The ICD9 codes are for insurance filing purposes. "They" have come up with all kinds of minutiae type codes to describe every possible problem and situation a patient can get themselves in. They even have codes to describe injuries from running into lamp posts for pity's sake. If a doctor sees a patient in a clinic/hospital for any problem, his/her medical records and charges for service have to be reflected in these codes in order to get appropriate reimbursement. People do die as the result of the above while under incarceration, or while commiting criminal acts. The codes do not mean that there are legally planned mass executions.
Recall stories you have heard in the news (I believe one happened in England) where someone was beheaded in the street by Muslims. Well, some hospital or medical facility needed a medical code for reporting that.
The folks higher up in medical reporting companies have been working on standardizing medical records and medical coding everywhere for years now. The doctors for whom I used to transcribe records have all had their own way of doing their medical recording; they are all different. Now they have to follow a standard form. Codes are shorter and easier for computers to interpret than long medical records.
I recommend everyone get a copy of their medical records and check them for accuracy. You have no idea how many errors are being reported due to the change over to electronic medical records. You no longer have smart,well-trained medical transcriptionists (AKA medical language specialist) to correct doctors' dictation. Yes, doctors do get things wrong and can enter wrong codes now that they are doing their own medical records and insurance filing.
In addition, consider that your medical records will no longer be private. They will be easily accessible to law enforcement, researchers and statistical groups, etc. The only way to avoid invasion of privacy of your medical records is to go to a doctor who has a closed records system (i.e. not shared with an outside party without your specific, signed consent), accepts cash and does not file your insurance for you.
Oh, and just because a code for a beheading is submitted to an insurance company does not mean that the charge will be paid by the insurance company----they may decide it's not a covered benefit under the plan.
"Disgraceful slander" posted in very poor taste. John Machaffie.
You've had some some pretty "despicable" posts relating to the President, this may be the "worst"
Why don't you rename the blog, "The Anti President Blog?"
Please read Marbury vs Madison 5 US 137 @
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=5&page=137
I found this from the opinion to be enlightening:
The question, whether an act, repugnant to the constitution, can become the law of the land, is a question deeply interesting to the United States; but, happily, not of an intricacy proportioned to its interest. It seems only necessary to recognise certain principles, supposed to have been long and well established, to decide it.
That the people have an original right to establish, for their future government, such principles as, in their opinion, shall most conduce to their own happiness, is the basis on which the whole American fabric has been erected. The exercise of this original right is a very great exertion; nor can it nor ought it to be frequently repeated. The principles, therefore, so established are deemed fundamental. And as the authority, from which they proceed, is supreme, and can seldom act, they are designed to be permanent.
This original and supreme will organizes the government, and assigns to different departments their respective powers. It may either stop here; or establish certain limits not to be transcended by those departments.
The government of the United States is of the latter description. The powers of the legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken or forgotten, the constitution is written. To what purpose are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing; if these limits may, at any time, be passed by those intended to be restrained? The distinction between a government with limited and unlimited powers is abolished, if those limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed, and if acts pro- [5 U.S. 137, 177] hibited and acts allowed are of equal obligation. It is a proposition too plain to be contested, that the constitution controls any legislative act repugnant to it; or, that the legislature may alter the constitution by an ordinary act.
Between these alternatives there is no middle ground. The constitution is either a superior, paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it.
Huh? Slander??? Where is Obama even mentioned in this?? ...
"Me thinks he doth protest too much." Shakespeare
Post a Comment