Only
18 confirmed US flu deaths in 2001. What?! by Jon Rappoport, June 20, 2014
It’s always
interesting when official agencies’ statistics come back to bite them. Hard.
In December of
2005, the British Medical Journal (BMJ online) published a shocking report by
Peter Dosh, which created tremors through the halls of the Centers for Disease
Control (CDC), where “the experts” used to tell the press that 36,000 people in
the US die every year from the flu.
Here is a quote
from Doshi’s report:
“[According to CDC
statistics], ‘influenza and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001-61,777 of
which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was
the flu virus positively identified.”
You might want to
chew on that sentence for a while.
You see, the CDC
has created one overall category that combines both flu and pneumonia deaths.
Why do they do this? Because they disingenuously assume that the pneumonia
deaths are complications stemming from the flu.
This is an absurd
assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes.
But even worse, in
all the 2001 flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of an
influenza virus.
Therefore, the CDC
could not say, with assurance, that more than 18 people died of influenza in
2001. Not 36,000 deaths, the PR statistic. 18 deaths.
Doshi continued his
assessment of published CDC flu-death statistics: “Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC]
data show an average of 1348 [flu] deaths per year (range 257 to 3006).” These
figures refer to flu separated out from pneumonia.
This death toll is
obviously far lower than the parroted 36,000 figure. But it would drop much
lower, if you added the obvious need to confirm the presence of a flu virus in those
cases.
People say, “But
how could this be? How could this be?”
People in official
positions lie. That’s how. They lie, and then they lie again. They think
they’re immune from scrutiny and consequences.
People say, “There
must be a mistake here. A confusion. They wouldn’t tell a lie that big.”
There’s no mistake,
no confusion. They do tell lies that big.
Why? For many
reasons. For example, in this case, to sell flu vaccines. I could cite a number
of reasons, but I want to stay focused on the lie itself.
It’s instructive.
Look at the lie, look at the truth. Back and forth, back and forth. The false
reality-egg cracks. Hear it?
Jon Rappoport
No comments:
Post a Comment