Saturday, January 28, 2017



U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets...

“The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horsedrawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.”
Thompson v.Smith, 154 SE 579, 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135 “The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, is a common right which he has under the right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business.” –
Thompson vs. Smith, supra.; Teche Lines vs. Danforth, Miss., 12 S.2d 784 “… the right of the citizen to drive on a public street with freedom from police interference… is a fundamental constitutional right” -White, 97 Cal.App.3d.141, 158 Cal.Rptr. 562, 566-67 (1979) “citizens have a right to drive upon the public streets of the District of Columbia or any other city absent a constitutionally sound reason for limiting their access.”

Subject: supreme court;
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 18:03:30 -0800



Anonymous said...

Thanks for the news & it seems a good start. I add, PLEASE use discernment. The terms Citizen, Person, Public, Normal, Usual, District of Columbia, etc are NOT terms we think they mean and definitions may be changed. The Supremes are still jew majority, representing far far more than their 2% population.
Our rights are not given, but are to be protected, so these talmudic finks in black satanic ceremonial robes are not giving us anything, but redefining what their paymasters have long pre-planned.
Until the Noahide, Talmudic jew & jesuit monopoly is destroyed, our minds de-jew'ed, our Earth de-jesuit'ed, we are being spun within a whole new web of psychopathic controls. Take them OUT, destroy IT, distribute the TRUTHs about exactly Who & What IT & THEY really are.
Consider also their us of unlicensed drivers for their neferious purposes, allowing immigrants legal & illegal to jump ahead on their platform of "citizenry". We Are NOT Citizens unless we became "citizens". As Anna Von Reitz has endeavored to teach us We Are Nationals, NOT corporate citizens. Those who became citizens are!
They are giving the right of unlicensed travel to the very bunch We are NOT. We are Nationals NOT Citizens.
Do you see what I mean?
Thanks for posting this, its important that we have free exchange of ideas. Note also WeAReChange is doing a lot of good work, but it IS jew. Never never trust a jew to dig deep enough to expose & call out jews, unless it benefits the jew to do so.

Jews did 9/11
Jonathan Elinoff - This WeAreChange Colorado activist is the creator of a series of films called Core ..... This company is owned and run by Ben Venzke, a Jew.

Anonymous said...

Before any of you get into trouble trying to utilize this, consider the following: Your automobile has a VIN. It is registered as a commercial motor vehicle. When you registered it you gave it to the State as their property which they let you use and you have to abide by their regulations or they take it back. "Registration" is a synonym for "Reification", which means to ruleify or kingify your property; to give to the King what is rightfully his; to forfeit your property to the King. You must have the original certificate of origin for the automobile and show no contractual nexus to the State such as a SSN or vehicle registration. You must have a bond showing yourself to be self insured as normal insurance requires an SSN and grants them jurisdiction. You can be an American National with God given rights or a statutory citizen with government granted privileges. Remember that if you take the American National stance, the courts and the governing body have instructed the police to treat you as a terrorist and an enemy of the State. I have written many legal briefs and motions defending the right to travel over the years and if you admit to "Driving" (a commercial act that the State has the right to regulate) you have blown your case. If your automobile was ever titled, you have no standing to claim you were not driving a motor vehicle. If your automobile has a VIN (Vehicle identification number) it is prima-facia evidence you are operating a motor vehicle. On top of that; all property is held in trust in chapter 11 bankruptcy. In order to use the property of the trust you must have permission from the trustees of the trust (corporate service providers) and pay some sort of colorable consideration into the trust to become a beneficiary. This is trust law. Otherwise you are using someone else's property for your personal gain and that is called "Unjust Enrichment" and there are laws making you liable for damages, which is why people who go off half cocked on this issue go to jail. There is one man in Florida who did get a Constitutional attorney to explain this to the Sheriff and he is able to travel around town with his automobile without repercussions as he is a resident there. As soon as you cross into another jurisdiction or State, the Interstate commerce clause comes into effect and things can get nasty real quick. I just wrote the legal brief to defend one such case last year. I am not a BAR attorney so do not take this as legal advice. I have legal briefs to defend your right to travel in the Carolina's but the Courts ignore the law as a habit and do whatever they want to increase their revenue. I have been ticketed for driving in GA and NC with a TN license and plates and the Court did not care if I was not a NC resident and could not obtain their driver's license, I still had to pay the Court $347.00 and I no longer travel to NC or GA unless it is an emergency and someone else is driving. Like I said, when you cross State lines things change, and your driver's licence from your home State may not be recognized by a neighboring State. I found out the hard way. You may have the law on your side, but the law is irrelevant in today's Courtroom. Be safe, stay off the roads!!!

Popeye said...


Anonymous said...

Then, just maybe this should go 'viral' to all 50 states, and sent to ALL law enforcement officials nationwide- All a driver's license does is allow something that is illegal, to be done as long as anyone is licensed-BUT, notice how illegal it is IF you don't have one- It's all about control, AND, the almighty dollar-

Anonymous said...

Who says?

You're not getting out of it at any time unless you prove jurisdiction yourself. Jurisdiction, is you prove under 26 U.S.C. that you aren't a citizen and are just a foreigner period. They are the only ones that don't need insurance, private insured not included.

It doesn't matter what type of foreigner that is, because one can only be from either a foreign country or the union states. All that matters is you prove you aren't each time, any nexus with SSN/IDs or otherwise be damned. You should know by now you always have to prove this. It is nothing they can ignore and you're out of there.

Anonymous said...

P.S and no not everyone will ever have allodial titles....that is up to people to prove themselves.

Anonymous said...

You just made all that up and this article is MISINFORMATION.
Our lawyers have proven in all courts up to and including the arrest of the judge....the only thing you must PROVE every time is that you were not born in the UNITED STATES.

Understand it, read it and verify it. Technically every AMERICAN citizen is not a real U.S. Citizen and was not born in the UNITED STATES. As a foreigner, some do claim they were either born in another country, Puerto Rico or the States of the Union. Yet there is no other definition that can apply so you must prove one.

They will then be forced to back off and treat you as if you were not born inside the USA, which you probably weren't.

Anonymous said...

It starts with the right to travel, whether that includes driving to get somewhere, you are 'traveling', and the police who are not your equal, and could not match IQ with you will say, you are behind the wheel of the car [ technically, I'm in front of a steering apparatus, not behind it in my perspective ] then you are operating the motor vehicle, and it matters to him no difference, he just wants to say the 'key' words for his mini recorder and/or dashboard camera so it can be put in as evidence that he told you what you were doing and you denied it.

It's official oppression, but when they get away with it for so long, and you find their founding documents, the City Clerk can find them, and it tells who who created the police department and what they are given permission to do, and who created the municipal court, and what they are given permission to do, and you call them out on it, they get stagnant.

They've been doing it all this time.
To recognize the fact that they have been doing it wrong, illegally, and using public funding inappropriately, and maliciously prosecuting the people, they get stagnant.

To recognize it for one, recognizes it for their entire records on file in the public viewable for anyone to see the reason for the stop and the lack of probable cause, and that the only reason you were stopped is because the police lied and said you violated some code.

But the city has their own codes, and traffic is left to the state.
If you look, the municipal court creation papers does not let them do anything for the state, unless they are asked by the state to do it.

So no City police should be collecting fines for the state unless the state asked them to do it. Because a city mayor who creates the municipal court only has city powers, the city mayor does not have power to give the police anything over the state.

The legislature gave the state the powers and the state has their own state troopers, so no city yahoo should be stopping anyone claiming to be collecting funds for the state, because they never pass the funds up to the state, they keep it in their coffers, and all of them are benefiting from it, and no one will acknowledge any part of it.

I am glad Rod found the North Carolina Worker's Compensation court, to claim an injury from the city employees in the course of doing their supposed job, caused him injury, whether financially and otherwise in stolen time and loss of liberty.

I look forward to hearing the results of his case from Monday July 30, 2017.

Anonymous said...


What will ever be done for them? Can they even escape?

Anonymous said...

Beware this stuff here I did background research on and it depends soley on whether you are in a city or not!
If you are driving a motor vehicle in a city in public, they will cite you. Does not matter the time or place at all. Look up who owns the courthouse and who employs them as they are wage enforcers.

In towns or rural zones your mileage may vary better. I have never heard of any citizens traveling freely without being harassed. That might be another thing that varies depending on where you live, since for the most part I hear it only works for non citizens.

Anonymous said...

I hear the City is allowed to do it because it's considered a separate jurisdiction unto itself.

Like a private army, these people are legally allowed to make up the rules as they go. A city is a fortress estate.

But other places you may be right, the state has to hire the actors and observe how they enforce codes.
I have never heard of this working in Milawaukee however!

Anonymous said...

You're all correct.
They run the major cities like Military courts, and the health inspectors are all assigned Military seargents. So there's no cracking that brick wall...

Anonymous said...

When you claim or state "You are not a U.S. citizen" that puts the burden on you to prove, and you can never prove a negative. Instead, say something like " I have no knowledge or evidence in my possession that I am a U.S. citizen" (or resident) That will put the burden on them. Always put the burden on them and keep it off of you. I do not care if you have a declaration of status filed in their system. Just shut up and make them prove, you can always rebut them if necessary, but chances are they will never prove it.
by: kingdolan

Anonymous said...

All licenses today are tied to the TRADING WITH THE ENEMY ACT of 1917 when it was amended in 1933 to include the people.
by: kingdolan

Anonymous said...

Also none of that you folks are saying will work in new hard as it is to believe there are a lot of sovereigns there as well.
You have to be very careful with your words and state "As far as that goes, I have no evidence or insignia in my possession that shows I'm a U.S. citizen"

Freewill said...

If Lee Wanta pays off the U.S. Corporation's national debt, then the STRAWMAN evaporates!

Anonymous said...

No it would still exist, the administrators must default on ALL the debt entirely and than strawmen won't be as powerful