S.C.R.
1795, Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3
Dall. 54
Government
Is Foreclosed from Parity with Real People
– Supreme Court of the United States 1795
"Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of
the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary,
having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity
with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any
law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate,
artificial persons and the contracts between them."
Supreme Court of the United States 1795
[--Not the "United States Supreme Court" –ed.]
– Supreme Court of the United States 1795
"Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of
the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary,
having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity
with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any
law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate,
artificial persons and the contracts between them."
Supreme Court of the United States 1795
[--Not the "United States Supreme Court" –ed.]
3 comments:
This quotation has been floating around the internet for years. It does not exist in that case. I challenge anyone, as I gave done here before, to read that case and find it. Also read the case, see what it is about, and learn what context it must be read in. You just can't take any quotation from any case and apply it anywhere that suits you.
Also, there is no such court as the "United States Supreme Court". I also challenge anyone to find this court defined any where in law. The highest court is still The Supreme Court of the United States, always has been. The problem is that there have been walls built around it so you cannot access it.
Yes the CASE is not the "notes," mentioned above, of the case.
So the "notes" will not be located "in" the case in and of itself.
Maybe we can use the wordage other than "NOTES" such as "annotated" instead of just "notes," added to the case that "annotate" explain the case in fact.
Also, if the programming had not been so well done, had not been so deep and complete, than the actual "fiction" over the volunteered governed without (out-sided) their consent, would not want to deny the facts stated above! And no one would dis-belive the above NOTES on that case.
BUT since an artificial creation is just that, artificial, and than anyone that has an IQ above their shoe size, would agree whole-hartedly with the above "notes" rather than the rule of "government"
Logical fact is, again, government "can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them."
That is the bottom line, and IF the pretended "governed" would or could ever became FREE enough to under-stand that "government" can ONLY govern what it creates, or contracts with, and government did NOT CREATE US, than the above "NOTES" of that case would become more clear, and factual truth, than the nose on your face.
Learn the words... "consent of the governed," means that I have to concent / "contract" directly with the government for the government to have any say or ruling, or laws that pertain to me.
That is factual contractual LAW.
NO contact that I SIGNED, than no contract with me. And since no one "fully disclosed" anything that I did sign than the contract was fraud, and "fraud" stops all contracts.
Enjoy freedom... er ha free-from-doom!
You need to learn the difference between THEN and THAN. You wrote THAN where you should have wrote THEN. Other than that, I agree with everything you said.
Post a Comment