By Anna Von Reitz
1. I have had people saying, "Oh,
no! You don't want to have anything to do with the STRAWMAN!" --- but
just like in the Wizard of Oz, the STRAWMAN is your friend. I also have
people running off and registering their NAMES with State of State
organizations. Does it make sense to pay pirates for the use of your own
name, however it is styled? Hello?
There is a logic to everything and you must follow the logic of things to the end conclusion.
When you claim and re-convey your
Trade Name (also known as your Given Name) which is your Upper and Lower
Case First Middle Last name just like you were taught in Grade
School----that is, your name in this form: "John Mark Doe" and
re-convey it back to the "land and soil" of the state where you were
born, you in the same breath claim "all styles, orderings, permutations,
variations, spellings, and punctuation(s)" of that name and establish
their "permanent domicile" on the "land and soil" of the state where you
were born. You bring the STRAWMEN -- JOHN DOE, JOHN MARK DOE, and JOHN
M. DOE -- right along with you and put them back on the land
jurisdiction, too.
But, but, but....I hear some people
saying, you don't want the STRAWMAN! The STRAWMAN is a public slave and
owes tons of debt! Why would you ever want to claim the STRAWMAN?
To control the STRAWMAN, first and
foremost. Does it make sense that you would leave any version of your
name under the control of faceless bureaucrats? And as I secondarily
explained, while the STRAWMAN is a debtor and a public trust when it is
operating in the international jurisdiction of the sea, it is a creditor
and a private trust when operating on the international jurisdiction of
the land. When you bring HIM/HER back ashore, a little magic
happens--- the debtor becomes the creditor.
Think of it this way: so long as the
STRAWMAN is defined as a sea-going British chattel, HE is a debtor, a
criminal, a slave, and a public trust. The instant HE is redefined as an
American land asset, HE is a free and honorable creditor and a private
trust that the rats can't mess with. So in which condition do you want
your NAME to be in?
Yes, you do want to claim all the
variations of your name at the same time you claim and re-convey your
Trade Name, and you want to record their permanent domicile on the land
and soil of the state where you were born. Not only do you re-convey the
STRAWMEN to a permanent domicile on the land and soil jurisdiction, you
issue Certificates of Assumed Name for them and record those, too. You
want to claim back the proper use and identity of absolutely everything
associated with you and your estate, including whatever other new
"names" they dream up for you.
And please be aware that even now
they are scrambling around trying to keep their old schtick going by
dreaming up new variations of NAMES and Names for you. If you watch
your mail and your bank statements, you will see all sorts of peculiar
things appearing: JOHN Mark DOE, J. Mark Doe, JOHAN M. DOE,
JOHN-MARK:DOE, Doe: John Mark, and so on.
But your claim of all variations and
permutations and spellings and punctuation and orderings will already
be on the public record and they will all be predefined with a permanent
domicile on the land and soil of the state where you were born, so no
matter what, when the rats come to charge their newest "derivative" --
you will be ready to say, "Sorry, that's not a British prize. That's an
American vessel. And here is my Certified Copies of the Public Records
proving that I am the controller and owner of that name and trademark."
The paperwork also shows the
recorded permanent domicile of these "vessels" on the land and soil of a
sovereign state. End of story.
2. How to deal with THEIR courts?
Once you have your own paperwork
together and recorded, the only responsibility you have with respect to
their courts in most situations is: (1) presentation of the Mandatory
Notice required under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act; (2) proper
rebuttal to any summons; (3) duty to inform.
The FSIA Notice is required so that
they are given fair warning that you are claiming your status. The
reply to summons is to keep you out of trouble via any claim that you
evaded them or showed them contempt. You are not obligated to respond
to any summons other than rebutting it in a timely manner, which
basically means "returning service to the court" with a registered mail
letter saying, "Sorry, I am not obligated to appear and decline to do
so." You will want to include a brief signed "Testimony in Fulfillment
of Duty to Inform". This is just a brief statement of numbered facts in
which you say whatever is true about the referenced issues you were
summoned about. If you know nothing about them, you just say--- By
Special Limited Appearance I testify from without the United States on
my honor that: (1) It is a fact that I know nothing about the people or
issues referenced in the summons dated_________. And if you do know
anything that would be helpful to the court, you enumerate the facts in a
similar manner. You sign that Testimony using a by-line, meaning you
claim authorship like in a newspaper article--- by:________ and
thumbprint it in red ink, so that the thumbprint touches but does not
obscure your name. And send it in with the Mandatory Notice and your
Summons Rebuttal.
For 9/10th of the supposed
infractions people are summoned to appear for, this all that is
necessary to avoid any further contact from the court or any possible
claim that you showed them contempt or evaded anything. The key is to
be polite and remember that these people are supposed to be working for
you, so you do have a reasonable cause to assist them in the discharge
of their duties and a duty under the Public Law to inform them regarding
crimes that you may have witnessed.
For the other 1/10th, you have to
recall that while they do not have any nexus of authority related to you
most of the time, they do have a general law enforcement duty related
to the delegated powers and their governing constitution. If you stray
into their jurisdiction, you become subject to their administration.
For example, the federales have delegated authority over sales of
alcohol, tobacco and firearms across state lines. If you are a gun shop
owner engaged in selling guns across state lines, you come under
federal jurisdiction for those activities and have to hop through their
hoops and pay any applicable sales and manufacturing taxes related to
those activities--- and if you fail to do so, their courts can
legitimately call you to account for that.
Similarly, if you are directly
involved in any event on actual federal land, such as a fistfight on a
Naval Base, you can be legitimately summoned as a Witness, even though
you are a Foreign Sovereign with respect to them. If you participated
in the fight, you can be held for 72 hours and then released to the
local Sheriff.
The rules are similar for the
"federated" State of State and County corporate franchise
organizations. Their General Sessions laws may arguably apply to (and
for) you via administration of the Public Trust established for the
actual state in the wake of the Civil War, but none of their statutory
laws do.
The thing to remember is that nobody
wants a bunch of violent criminals ramrodding around the country doing
what they please. We are all obligated in our own small sphere to keep
the peace and avoid harming other people and their property. Its a very
simple and common sense standard when you get down to it and once you
know who you are, who they are, and what is supposed to be happening.
The other thing I want everyone to
remember is that the American Common Law is very straight-forward and
often Draconian. You rustle cattle, you get hung. Period. You get
drunk and drive and run over and kill a teenager walking home from
school, you get tried for murder no ifs, ands, or buts.
I say this to point out that while
the American Common Law offers people a lot more freedom, it also
requires a lot more social responsibility. There is no moddle-coddling
of criminals and no discretion for judges. What the jury decides, the
jury decides. And that's that. Any other mitigating circumstances,
your bad childhood, your fear of dogs--- doesn't count.
So when you put your Trade Name back
on the land and soil and place yourself under the American Common
Law--- be aware that true freedom requires the responsible exercise of
that freedom.
3. What about people born in the District of Columbia or to members of the military serving overseas?
If either one or both of your
parents was born on the land and soil of an American state, you can
claim your nationality through either one them.
If neither parent was born on the
land and soil of an American state, you are stuck being a Federal
Citizen, and have to claim Equal Civil Rights as your remedy, until you
establish your own permanent domicile within an actual state of the
Union.
A similar situation pertains to
first generation immigrants. They are naturalized as United States
Citizens and retain that public status until and unless they meet the
requirements (varies from state to state) to become state nationals--
what the Federales call "United States Nationals".
Generally speaking you have to live
in a state for a specified period of time, have to declare your
intention, have to establish a permanent home, have to avoid any felony
convictions, and demonstrate that you are self-supporting, of age, of
sound mind, and generally good character. Its a rigorous but reasonable
standard established in the General Session Laws of each state, and if
you meet the standard and follow the instructions established by the
law, you can claim to be a Floridian, Vermonter, or Wisconsinite like
everyone else there.
4. What about Social Security and other federal programs? Won't I lose all that I paid for if I do this?
See Item 1. You don't lose
anything. You gain control of what is rightfully yours and cease to be
treated as a mentally incompetent ward of the State of State.
For people already getting payments
from Social Security the key word is "retired". The "federal
government" is nothing more or less than corporations in the business of
providing stipulated governmental services, just like GM is in the
business of building and selling cars, and Dell is in the business of
building and selling computers. If you are like most Americans, you
have never been employed by the federal government at all and have been
misidentified as a federal worker and "taxpayer" most of your life. You
paid into their social welfare/retirement fund, called the Public
Charitable Trust, by mistake, as the result of disinformation and
coercion telling you that you were required to get a Social Security
Number and required to pay federal income taxes and required to act as a
federal citizen.
It's still the same situation as if
you had worked for GM or Dell and vested in their retirement program.
Once you are retired, you no longer have to wear a GM uniform or name
tag or carry a Dell Employee ID. Same thing with the federal
government. You are retired from any and all such obligations of their
"citizenship" and are free to return to your birthright status without
it impacting any iota of what you are owed.
But, but, but.... OMG! What happens if these federal corporations go bankrupt and I lose my pension?
Not to worry. You are actually
their Priority Creditors. The Veterans and the Pensioners get first
dibs. Just claim up your Name/NAMES and remove their permanent domicile
to the land and soil of your birth state. We have already set up the
Indemnity Bond for your State and an Equal Protection Claim for you, and
since your whole problem has been caused by fraud and Breach of Trust
in the first place, you are triply indemnified.
The Social Security program
established by the Federales was a cheapskate program that was
mismanaged---a bureaucratic nightmare, and on top of everything else,
anything you got back from it was taxed. This makes more sense when you
realize that Social Security was twisted around and redefined as part
of the Public Charitable Trust that was established in the wake of the
Civil War as a welfare trust to take care of displaced plantation
slaves--converting the pension payments you are owed into welfare
benefits that are a non-obligatory debt of a bankrupt corporation.
There can be little to no doubt
that the rats in Congress intended to bankrupt their governmental
services corporations and stiff the American Veterans and Retirees.
However, this was observed and
objected to twenty years ago, and doggedly pursued all this time, to
prevent that from ever happening. Instead of you all suddenly facing
old age without a penny and no medical care and all the other
nightmarish possibilities that present themselves to your imaginations,
you will be in receipt of far better care, far better payments, and far
less red-tape.
The new system will be far better
than anything currently available and provide a much broader spectrum of
care and higher retirement payments for both Veterans and Retirees in
general, whether public or private sector. It will also provide
services that are currently unavailable-- counseling and physical
therapy options that don't exist now, in-house treatment programs for
alcoholism and drug addiction, nutritional and natural healing options
that aren't currently covered, hospice and caretaker respite services
and much, much more.
So, instead of fear-mongering and
spreading rumors and sitting around on your duffs feeling helpless and
scared, get up on your hind legs and start walking with your heads up
and your shoulders back. You have worked hard all your lives and paid
your dues in Good Faith. You have nothing to be ashamed of. Those who
have defrauded you and abused your trust are the ones who need to
re-think their values and blush.
----------------------------
See this article and over 800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
No comments:
Post a Comment