Tuesday, May 28, 2013


Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 10:49 PM


Finally, the Washington Post speaks out on Obama! This is very brutal, timely though. As I'm sure you know, the Washington Post newspaper has a reputation for being extremely liberal . So the fact that its editor saw fit to print the following article about Obama in its newspaper makes this a truly amazing event and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President and his obvious socialist agenda are starting to trickle through the “protective wall” built around him by our liberal media.


By Matt Patterson (columnist - Washington Post, New York Post, San Francisco Examiner)

Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world's largest economy, direct the world's most powerful military, execute the world's most consequential job? Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer"; a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did he vote "present"); and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.

He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual mentor"; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?

Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass - held to a lower standard - because of the color of his skin.

Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?

Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon - affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.

Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if these minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin - that's affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is.

And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois ; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.

What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people - conservatives included - ought now to be deeply embarrassed.

The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clich├ęs, and that's when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth - it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.

And what about his character?

Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?

In short: our president is a small and small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office.


Anonymous said...

Provide a link to this article otherwise its just an eRumor

Anonymous said...

Damn..maybe we are waking up after all

Anonymous said...

May the dam continue to burst wide open....

Lance said...

Interesting, but still BS. If his job is to take America down, he is succeeding.

Anonymous said...

Let's not forget that G.W. Bush was illegally elected too. Just sayin and LORD HOWDY if you only knew what G.W. has been up to all these years.....why it would make the tears in your eyes leak out into your pants!! But very soon it will all come out...it will all come into the LIGHT! And you will know, everyone will know.

Anonymous said...

Not an e-rumor. Check the author/Washington Post. Apparently you are not familar with the Washington Post. For you information it is a newspaper in Washington, DC.

Anonymous said...

You are right - he is succeeding...................The article was written by a liberal reporter and published in a liberal newspaper - not BS

Anonymous said...

I've been a Obama hater too but what I have learned is nothing is what it seems...I guess we will see soon..

Anonymous said...

Here is the link to the article:


Matt Patterson did write an article against Obama, but it was never printed as an article in the Washington Post. It was instead published on the American Thinker website under the title, 'Obama: The Affirmative Action President'.

Anonymous said...

A link? Are you helpless? Go to the website of the newspapers he is affiliated with and do some research. Or, google it! Do you have to be spoon fed?

Anonymous said...

Oh my gosh, two clicks and I have the link... http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/03/washington-post-hits-obama-2582140.html

Hope this helps to ease your eRumor!!!

Anonymous said...

I think this article is BS, it was posted here before and someone said this writer does not work for any of this newspapers, it was a few weeks ago.

Anonymous said...

Sorry peeps, the author is just another disgruntled writer blaming the office of the president, not understanding that the president does not run the country.

The illuminati do. The president is simply in acting as a place holder for someone to blame while the illuminati trash the planet so you will stay focused on a face you recognize rather than faces you don't get to know.

Shallow minded intellectuals who cannot understand the very dire circumstances in which they are under so they could even have a chance at coming out of what they find themselves in.

When you blame other people for your circumstances you do not understand that it is YOU that is the problem. You have been tricked and hoodwinked beyond your conscious ability to see how it is being done in order to make you do things to punish yourself because your thoughts and mind has been taken over by another entity through counterfeiting your identity to steal your very precious life.

And you don't understand it to explain it to yourselves let alone anyone else, so you are only left with bitching whining and complaining about your crummy government, just like the illuminati planed it.

Problem, reaction solution. You lose because of your own incompetency so understand you are living in the matrix of illusion that is compelling you to perform fiction contracting schemes under a threat that is keeping you afraid so you lash out as if you are being attacked in your own defense since you do not know how to solve the great dilemma you find yourselves in.

You are illuminati toast for the breakfast of champions, because your free will say so has been hijacked and stolen taking you into another realm you think is real, when it really isn't. But you keep answering to fiction things and objects as if they were real, when they really aren't.

Anonymous said...

Wake Up People,YES Obama is not good & Has Not done much of anything he said he would, but "He's To Blame"??? hahahahahahahaha

No Dummies, LORD ROTHSCHILD'S TO BLAME .......for centuries!

Soros,gates etc etc Obama, ghwb GWB, ALL Rothschild's/Satan's PUPPETS

ANY Fool That Thinks This Economy has ANYTHING TO DO With Bank-Friendly OBAMA


Anonymous said...

Finally, those gutless MSM are printing the truth about that usurper traitor!!
They also need to start printing the truth about AG Eric Holdeer, the lying piece of scum. He needs to be jailed for lying to the investigating committee
while under oath.

McCroft said...

AnonymousMay 28, 2013 at 11:51 PM
Well said.. interesting how fast people tend to blame others. I'm managing 3 websites to wake up people and I talk about it all over.

This game of Monopoly has the rules spread all over, yes they pointed at the rules even when we were infants and could not read but still they are all there for all to see.
- Numerous Holloywood productions have shown us what is happening.
- All wars have been started with fals flags.
- The war on drugs has never been a war.
- The Banksters have tricked us since the beginning of time
- They spray chemtrails all over.
- They feed us GMO food.
- They give us flouride water.
- They give us medicins for profit not for health
- The educations system stinks cause we are led to believe that we need to achieve this and that in order to stay in our box.

And it goes on and on.. money is just energy. Energy is neutral lets take the energy and make something positive out of it. Pointing fingers never did the job.


Anonymous said...

a few click too little ;)

that article actually has nesara news from march as its source:
" 2013-03-03 13:33:46
Source: http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2013/03/washington-post-hits-obama.html"

Jay Werner and proud of it said...

Calm down peeps, liberals never change, ever, remember that going forward , this guy is simply a Hillary supporter , nothing more nothing less , it seems that bho is just starting to bring their house of cards down and they all are looking for life preservers on a sinking ship...........read between the lines (rbtl) with Liberty and Justice for All.........

Anonymous said...

Let us not forget that Obama was seen as the antidote to the totally incompetent GWBush who invaded a sovereign country on the basis of rumor, wasting 8 billion dollars and ruining countless lives in Iraq and America. That would not have happened if Al Gore had been allowed to be president. Bush couldn't put 2 words together to make a sentence and yet Americans voted for him TWICE!!!!! So, Obama is not the problem, American voters are. Look at the current Congress - WHO elected them?????

Anonymous said...

how many times will people like you tell us the "tire is flat" before the same people like you fix the SOB?

Anonymous said...

What planet do you live on? Some democrats are so ignorant.

Anonymous said...

Hahahahaha!!! The topic is BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and we still have people bringing up George Bush! George Bush? GHW Bush? Yes, it was Bush's fault. Someone said it was Bush's fault so it must be true. Even Obama said it, so it must be true. You have heard it over and over and over and over so now you are positively convinced that it was Bush's fault...whatever IT was, it was Bush's fault. It couldn't ever be a diversionary tactic aka propaganda to deceive you, could it. Even if it is true instead of purposeful brainwashing, wake up and deal with the freaking MONSTERS at hand. You know, the corrupt liars, communists, tyrannical treasonous tyrants sitting in Congress, the White House, the military, IRS, DHS and all other govt. agencies before it's too late.

Anonymous said...

See, this is precisely why it's so hard to come here and believe anything that I read. The headline makes my mind want to think that this actually appeared IN the Washington Post as in, PUBLISHED...but the lack of a link bringing me there quickly makes me realize this is just WISHFUL THINKING. Like, if we just 'manifest it happening in our minds, then maybe it will...?'. MORE BS again doesn't help us, John.

Anonymous said...

Sorry. eRumor. Article never appered in the Washington Post.

Anonymous said...

No he needs to be the recipient of the business end of a rope flung over the brach of a tree Mississippi style.

Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

The Truth:
This is a real article called " The Affirmative Action President" written by Matt Patterson, which appeared on the conservative opinion web site American Thinker on August 18, 2011.

This article did not appear in the Washington Post and according to a November 4, 2011 opinion in the Washington Post Patterson is not employed at the newspaper although he has had some articles published there in the past, but this article was not one of them.
The Newsweek cover is real but Patterson's article did not appear in in this edition of Newsweek.

Updated 10/28/12

A real example of the eRumor as it has appeared on the Internet:

Continue reading here....